<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>No Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, Redmi 5 Plus Takes It Place - Gizmochina</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2017/12/20/no-xiaomi-redmi-note-5-redmi-5-plus-takes-place/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gizmochina.com/2017/12/20/no-xiaomi-redmi-note-5-redmi-5-plus-takes-place/</link>
	<description>Latest Tech News, Product Reviews and Deals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 06:40:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>No Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, Redmi 5 Plus Takes It Place</title>
		<link>https://www.gizmochina.com/2017/12/20/no-xiaomi-redmi-note-5-redmi-5-plus-takes-place/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gizmochina.com/2017/12/20/no-xiaomi-redmi-note-5-redmi-5-plus-takes-place/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Habeeb Onawole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xiaomi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redmi 5 Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redmi Note 5]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gizmochina.com/?p=163060</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/r-300x169.jpg?x10805" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="xiaomi redmi 5 plus" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/r-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/r-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/r-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/r.jpg 1280w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p>In 2014, Xiaomi released the Redmi Note &#8211; a bigger and more powerful version of the original Redmi released in 2013. In the following years, each Redmi version has always launched with a “Note” variant.  However, that will not be the case for the Redmi 5. According to a super moderator (mitch002) on the MIUI [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2017/12/20/no-xiaomi-redmi-note-5-redmi-5-plus-takes-place/">No Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, Redmi 5 Plus Takes It Place</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/r-300x169.jpg?x10805" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="xiaomi redmi 5 plus" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/r-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/r-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/r-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/r.jpg 1280w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p>In 2014, Xiaomi released the Redmi Note &#8211; a bigger and more powerful version of the original Redmi released in 2013. In the following years, each Redmi version has always launched with a “Note” variant.  However, that will not be the case for the Redmi 5.</p>
<figure id="attachment_161078" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-161078" style="width: 600px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-161078 size-full" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Redmi-5-Plus-Color-Variants.jpg?x10805" alt="Redmi 5 Plus" width="600" height="600" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Redmi-5-Plus-Color-Variants.jpg 600w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Redmi-5-Plus-Color-Variants-150x150.jpg 150w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Redmi-5-Plus-Color-Variants-300x300.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-161078" class="wp-caption-text">Redmi 5 Plus will replace Redmi Note 5</figcaption></figure>
<p>According to a super moderator (mitch002) on the MIUI Forum, Xiaomi will not be releasing a Redmi Note 5. Instead the Redmi Note 4&#8217;s successor will be the full-screen Redmi 5 Plus which already launched earlier this month.</p>
<p>Fans have been looking forward to a Redmi Note 5 which is expected to come with the same 5.99-inch FHD+ display as the Redmi 5 Plus but a Snapdragon 660 or at least Snapdragon 630 chipset.</p>
<figure id="attachment_163061" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-163061" style="width: 703px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-163061" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Xiaomi-Redmi-Note-5.png?x10805" alt="Xiaomi Redmi Note 5" width="703" height="392" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Xiaomi-Redmi-Note-5.png 703w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Xiaomi-Redmi-Note-5-300x167.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 703px) 100vw, 703px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-163061" class="wp-caption-text">Excerpt of Mitch002&#8217;s Post on the MIUI Forum</figcaption></figure>
<p>Unfortunately, they will be disappointed to learn that it is the Redmi 5 Plus with the same Snapdragon 625 processor as the Redmi Note 4 (Redmi Note 4X).</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;">READ MORE:</span> <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2017/12/18/xiaomi-mi-a1-special-edition-red-india-launch/">Xiaomi Mi A1 Special Edition Red Launched In India For Rs. 13,999</a><span id="more-163060"></span></p>
<p>There have been complaints over Xiaomi&#8217;s continuous use of the Snapdragon 625 processor for its mid-range phones. It didn&#8217;t make use of the Snapdragon 652 and 653 chips, it also seems to not find the Snapdragon 626 interesting. Now it appears the Snapdragon 630 and 636 will not power any of the 5th generation Redmi phones too.</p>
<p>Xiaomi has not released an official statement yet on the matter, so this may turn out to be false after all.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://en.miui.com/thread-1321835-1-1.html">Source</a>, <a href="https://www.gsmarena.com/xiaomi_redmi_note_5_new_name_xiaomi_redmi_5_plus-news-28799.php">Via</a>)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>

    <div class="openweb-comments-container" style="margin-top: 40px; border-top: 1px solid #eee; padding-top: 20px;">
        <h3>Comments</h3>
        <div data-spotim-module="conversation" data-post-id="163060" data-post-url="https://www.gizmochina.com/2017/12/20/no-xiaomi-redmi-note-5-redmi-5-plus-takes-place/"></div>
    </div><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2017/12/20/no-xiaomi-redmi-note-5-redmi-5-plus-takes-place/">No Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, Redmi 5 Plus Takes It Place</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gizmochina.com/2017/12/20/no-xiaomi-redmi-note-5-redmi-5-plus-takes-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 34/38 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Content Delivery Network Full Site Delivery via cloudflare
Database Caching 13/22 queries in 0.008 seconds using Redis
Fragment Caching 4/5 fragments using Redis

Served from: www.gizmochina.com @ 2026-04-19 08:55:17 by W3 Total Cache
-->