<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Exynos 9810 vs Snapdragon 845 vs Kirin 970: Comparison Between The Best Smartphone SoCs - Gizmochina</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2018/01/08/exynos-9810-vs-snapdragon-845-vs-kirin-970-comparison-between-the-best-smartphone-socs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gizmochina.com/2018/01/08/exynos-9810-vs-snapdragon-845-vs-kirin-970-comparison-between-the-best-smartphone-socs/</link>
	<description>Latest Tech News, Product Reviews and Deals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:06:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Exynos 9810 vs Snapdragon 845 vs Kirin 970: Comparison Between The Best Smartphone SoCs</title>
		<link>https://www.gizmochina.com/2018/01/08/exynos-9810-vs-snapdragon-845-vs-kirin-970-comparison-between-the-best-smartphone-socs/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gizmochina.com/2018/01/08/exynos-9810-vs-snapdragon-845-vs-kirin-970-comparison-between-the-best-smartphone-socs/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michele Ingelido]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huawei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exynos 9810 vs Snapdragon 845 vs Kirin 970]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kirin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirin 970]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung exynos 9810]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snapdragon 845]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gizmochina.com/?p=165339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/qualcomm_snapdragon_845_vs-300x169.png?x10805" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="qualcomm_snapdragon_845" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/qualcomm_snapdragon_845_vs-300x169.png 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/qualcomm_snapdragon_845_vs-768x432.png 768w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/qualcomm_snapdragon_845_vs.png 800w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p>If we take into consideration the Android smartphones market, Samsung Exynos 9810, Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 and Kirin 970 are the best processors ever announced in the past few months. Exynos 9810 will power the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 in its European version, Kirin 970 is aboard Huawei Mate 10 and 10 Pro and it will [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2018/01/08/exynos-9810-vs-snapdragon-845-vs-kirin-970-comparison-between-the-best-smartphone-socs/">Exynos 9810 vs Snapdragon 845 vs Kirin 970: Comparison Between The Best Smartphone SoCs</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/qualcomm_snapdragon_845_vs-300x169.png?x10805" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="qualcomm_snapdragon_845" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/qualcomm_snapdragon_845_vs-300x169.png 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/qualcomm_snapdragon_845_vs-768x432.png 768w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/qualcomm_snapdragon_845_vs.png 800w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p>If we take into consideration the Android smartphones market, <strong>Samsung Exynos 9810, Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 and Kirin 970</strong> are the best processors ever announced in the past few months. Exynos 9810 will power the upcoming<a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/product/samsung-galaxy-s9/"> Samsung Galaxy S9</a> in its European version, Kirin 970 is aboard <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/product/huawei-mate-10/">Huawei Mate 10</a> and <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/product/huawei-mate-10-pro/">10 Pro</a> and it will also be aboard the Huawei P20, while Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 will power the other most important flagship phones of 2018. Which one is the best SoC? Here you can see a <strong>Exynos 9810 vs Snapdragon 845 vs Kirin 970 comparison</strong> between their specs.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-165369" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/exynos.jpg?x10805" alt="exynos 9810" width="740" height="384" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/exynos.jpg 740w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/exynos-300x156.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 740px) 100vw, 740px" /></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3></h3>
<h3 style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Exynos 9810 vs Snapdragon 845 vs Kirin 970</strong></span></h3>
<table class="tablepress tablepress-id-43">
<thead>
<tr class="row-1 odd">
<th class="column-1" width="10%"></th>
<th class="column-2" width="33%">Exynos 9810</th>
<th class="column-3" width="33%">Qualcomm Snapdragon 845</th>
<th class="column-4" width="33%">Kirin 970</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody class="row-hover">
<tr class="row-2 even">
<td class="column-1">CPU</td>
<td class="column-2">octa-core</p>
<p>4x Exynos M3 2.9 GHz, 4x Exynos M3 1.9 GHz</p>
<p>2nd Gen 10 nm FinFET LPP, 64 bit</td>
<td class="column-3">octa-core</p>
<p>8x Kryo 385, Clock frequency: Up to 2.8 GHz</p>
<p>2nd Gen 10 nm FinFET LPP, 64 bit</td>
<td class="column-4"> octa-core</p>
<p>4x Cortex A73 2.4 GHz, 4x Cortex-A53 1.8 Ghz</p>
<p>10 nm, 64 bit</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-3 odd">
<td class="column-1">GPU</td>
<td class="column-2">ARM Mali G72 MP18</td>
<td class="column-3">Adreno 630</td>
<td class="column-4"> ARM Mali G72 MP12</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-4 even">
<td class="column-1">Camera</td>
<td class="column-2">Up to 24 MP Single</p>
<p>16 + 16 MP Dual</td>
<td class="column-3">Up to 32 MP single camera</p>
<p>Up to 16 MP dual camera</td>
<td class="column-4">Dual camera support</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-5 odd">
<td class="column-1">Video</td>
<td class="column-2">Up to 4K Ultra HD at 120 fps (video recording)</p>
<p>Up to 4K Ultra HD at 120 fps (video playback)</td>
<td class="column-3">Up to 4K Ultra HD at 60 fps (video recording)</p>
<p>Up to 4K Ultra HD at 60 fps (video playback)</td>
<td class="column-4"> Up to 4K Ultra HD at 30 fps (video recording)</p>
<p>Up to 4K Ultra HD at 60 fps (video playback)</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-6 even">
<td class="column-1">Display</td>
<td class="column-2">Up to 4K UHD 4096 x 2160 pixels</p>
<p>WQUXGA 3840 x 2400 pixels at 60 fps</td>
<td class="column-3">Up to 4K UHD</td>
<td class="column-4"> Up to 4K Ultra HD</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-7 odd">
<td class="column-1">Connectivity</td>
<td class="column-2">Dual Band Wi-Fi b/g/n/ac with MU-MIMO.</p>
<p>Bluetooth 5.0, NFC</p>
<p>Cellular Modem: LTE Cat. 18 6CA up to 1.2 Gbps (download), LTE Cat. 18 2CA up to 200 Mbps (upload)</td>
<td class="column-3">Dual Band Wi-Fi 2&#215;2 802.11ad Multi-Gigabit with MU-MIMO.</p>
<p>Bluetooth 5.0, NFC</p>
<p>Cellular Modem: Snapdragon X20 LTE, up to 1.2 Gbps Mbps download speed, up to 150 Mbps upload speed</td>
<td class="column-4"> Dual Band Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac with 4&#215;4 MIMO</p>
<p>Bluetooth 4.2, NFC</p>
<p>Cellular Modem: LTE Cat. 18 up to 1.2 Gbps download speed</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-8 even">
<td class="column-1">Audio</td>
<td class="column-2">32 bit/384 kHz quality</td>
<td class="column-3">Qualcomm Aqstic audio technology</p>
<p>Qualcomm aptX</td>
<td class="column-4">32 bit/384 kHz quality</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-9 odd">
<td class="column-1">Location</td>
<td class="column-2">GPS, GLONASS, Beidou</td>
<td class="column-3"> GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS</p>
<p>Low Power Geofencing and Tracking, Sensor-assisted navigation</td>
<td class="column-4"> GPS, GLONASS, BDS</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-10 even">
<td class="column-1">Battery Charging</td>
<td class="column-2">Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge, Fast Wireless Charging (Qi and PMA)</td>
<td class="column-3">Qualcomm Quick Charge 4/4+</td>
<td class="column-4"> Fast battery charging</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Each of these SoCs have octa-core architecture and has a dedicated chip for artificial intelligence and deep learning. The first difference that is possible to notice is the clock frequency. Exynos 8910 has the highest max frequency, but Snapdragon 845 has a max frequency of 2.8 GHz for each of its cores, while Exynos 9810 has a 2.9 GHz frequency only for 4 cores. Kirin 970 has the lowest frequency with 2.4 GHz. Each SoC has a modem that can reach a download speed of 1.2 Gbps, but Exynos 9810 has the highest upload speed with 200 Mbps.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the Snapdragon 845 has a GPU that&#8217;s likely better: the Adreno 630. Further, Snapdragon 845 will probably provide more modding options. If I had to pick one, I would personally choose the Snapdragon 845 by Qualcomm, but that is mostly for personal tasks, as Samsung Exynos 9810 is as excellent as its opponent. I define Kirin 970 slightly inferior to both its opponents, but note that <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/huawei">Huawei </a>devices with this processor are more affordable.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Exynos 9810 vs Snapdragon 845 vs Kirin 970: Summary<br />
</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Samsung Exynos 9810</strong></p>
<p>PRO</p>
<ul>
<li>Powerful</li>
<li>High speed modem</li>
<li>Good connectivity</li>
</ul>
<p>CONS</p>
<ul>
<li>Limited availability (Samsung Galaxy S9/S9+ only)</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Snapdragon 845</strong></p>
<p>PRO</p>
<ul>
<li>Incredible performances</li>
<li>Soon available on many flagships</li>
<li>Great GPU</li>
</ul>
<p>CONS</p>
<ul>
<li>Nothing special</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Kirin 970</strong></p>
<p>PRO</p>
<ul>
<li>Good power</li>
<li>Already available</li>
<li>Affordable price</li>
</ul>
<p>CONS</p>
<ul>
<li>Less powerful than its opponents</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
[yop_poll id=&#8221;6&#8243;]

    <div class="openweb-comments-container" style="margin-top: 40px; border-top: 1px solid #eee; padding-top: 20px;">
        <h3>Comments</h3>
        <div data-spotim-module="conversation" data-post-id="165339" data-post-url="https://www.gizmochina.com/2018/01/08/exynos-9810-vs-snapdragon-845-vs-kirin-970-comparison-between-the-best-smartphone-socs/"></div>
    </div><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2018/01/08/exynos-9810-vs-snapdragon-845-vs-kirin-970-comparison-between-the-best-smartphone-socs/">Exynos 9810 vs Snapdragon 845 vs Kirin 970: Comparison Between The Best Smartphone SoCs</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gizmochina.com/2018/01/08/exynos-9810-vs-snapdragon-845-vs-kirin-970-comparison-between-the-best-smartphone-socs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 41/65 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Content Delivery Network Full Site Delivery via cloudflare
Database Caching 15/27 queries in 0.006 seconds using Redis
Fragment Caching 4/5 fragments using Redis

Served from: www.gizmochina.com @ 2026-04-17 07:57:13 by W3 Total Cache
-->