<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>exynos 1000 vs snapdragon 875 Archives - Gizmochina</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/exynos-1000-vs-snapdragon-875/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/exynos-1000-vs-snapdragon-875/</link>
	<description>Latest Tech News, Product Reviews and Deals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 14:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Samsung&#8217;s Exynos 1000 SoC might outperform the upcoming Qualcomm Snapdragon 875</title>
		<link>https://www.gizmochina.com/2020/09/21/samsungs-exynos-1000-soc-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-875-benchmark/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Balaji S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 14:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exynos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exynos 1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exynos 1000 vs snapdragon 875]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snapdragon 875]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gizmochina.com/?p=343473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="201" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Samsung-Exynos-logo-e1528781791809-300x201.png?x96852" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Samsung Exynos 9710" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Samsung-Exynos-logo-e1528781791809-300x201.png 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Samsung-Exynos-logo-e1528781791809.png 674w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p>Samsung faced a lot of criticism with the Exynos 990 SoC. The chipset was underwhelming compared to the Qualcomm&#8217;s counterpart. However, that could change now as an alleged report on the Korean forum says the Exynos 1000(Tentative) SoC on the next flagship could perform better than the upcoming Snapdragon 875. &#160; Exynos 1000 vs Snapdragon [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2020/09/21/samsungs-exynos-1000-soc-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-875-benchmark/">Samsung&#8217;s Exynos 1000 SoC might outperform the upcoming Qualcomm Snapdragon 875</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="201" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Samsung-Exynos-logo-e1528781791809-300x201.png?x96852" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Samsung Exynos 9710" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Samsung-Exynos-logo-e1528781791809-300x201.png 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Samsung-Exynos-logo-e1528781791809.png 674w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p>Samsung faced a lot of criticism with the <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2020/04/13/galaxy-s20-ultra-users-are-facing-autofocus-performance-heating-and-battery-issues/">Exynos 990 SoC</a>. The chipset was underwhelming compared to the Qualcomm&#8217;s counterpart. However, that could change now as an alleged report on the Korean forum says the Exynos 1000(Tentative) SoC on the next flagship could perform better than the upcoming Snapdragon 875.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-195914" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Samsung-Exynos-logo-e1528781791809.png?x96852" alt="Samsung Exynos 9710" width="674" height="452" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Samsung-Exynos-logo-e1528781791809.png 674w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Samsung-Exynos-logo-e1528781791809-300x201.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 674px) 100vw, 674px" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3><strong>Exynos 1000 vs Snapdragon 875 Leaked Geekbench Scores</strong></h3>
<p>The report leads us to two sets of Geekbench scores on the Korean forum. One with <a href="https://www.clien.net/service/board/park/15384053">Snapdragon 875</a> and the other with the <a href="https://www.clien.net/service/board/park/15389434">Exynos</a> SoC. The devices used are Xiaomi Mi 11, and Samsung Galaxy S21. Of course, both the SoCs are unannounced and hence, these are tentative namings without confirmation on their existence.</p>
<p>Moving on, the Galaxy S21 seems to be tested with Exynos 1000 and Snapdragon 875.  Both the single and multi-core scores of the Exynos are 1302 and 4250 points. This is significantly higher than Snapdragon&#8217;s 1159 and 4090 points. Also, Xiaomi&#8217;s Mi 11 allegedly recorded 1102 and 4113 points.</p>
<p>That said, the post doesn&#8217;t present any visual evidence like a screenshot to us. This poses a great doubt on its legitimacy and hence, we will have to wait for more info. Further, one of the posts also says that Samsung had to overclock the ARM&#8217;s top-performing core which is the recently launched <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2020/05/27/arm-cortex-a78-mali-g78-announced/">ARM Cortex-X1</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Editor&#8217;s Pick: <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2020/09/18/samsung-wireless-charging-trio-listing-reveals-more-details/">Samsung Wireless Charging Trio listing reveals more details</a></strong></p>
<h3>Overclocking ARM&#8217;s Cortex-X1 core</h3>
<p>The report adds that there is an issue on the ARM&#8217;s side and to get the desired performance, Samsung has overclocked the SoC to land scores higher than the Snapdragon 875. While we need more information on this, it also suggests that the newer Core-X1 might be present on both the upcoming flagship SoCs as expected before.</p>
<p>Anyway, this is a significant bump up for both Snapdragon and Exynos SoCs. This is because the older ones had single and multi-core scores below 1000 and 4000 points. If we recall, Samsung is <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2020/06/22/qualcomm-snapdragon-875-goes-into-production/">manufacturing </a>Snapdragon 875 SoC for Qualcomm using the 5nm EUV process. Also, with reports saying Samsung could share <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2020/09/18/samsung-exynos-to-share-sd875-cluster-design/">cluster design</a> from Snapdragon 875 on its Exynos, the above scores could be true as well.</p>
<p>This is rather exciting news and Samsung could finally match Qualcomm after years of struggle. However, since both the SoCs won&#8217;t be out for at least the next couple of months, so let&#8217;s play the waiting game.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Up Next: <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2020/09/21/samsung-teases-galaxy-f-smartphones-india/">Samsung teases new Galaxy F series of smartphones in India</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2020/09/21/samsungs-exynos-1000-soc-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-875-benchmark/">Samsung&#8217;s Exynos 1000 SoC might outperform the upcoming Qualcomm Snapdragon 875</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 29/57 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Content Delivery Network Full Site Delivery via cloudflare
Database Caching 15/27 queries in 0.006 seconds using Redis
Fragment Caching 2/3 fragments using Redis

Served from: www.gizmochina.com @ 2026-09-26 14:21:41 by W3 Total Cache
-->