<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Exynos 2100 vs Snapdragon 888 Archives - Gizmochina</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/exynos-2100-vs-snapdragon-888/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/exynos-2100-vs-snapdragon-888/</link>
	<description>Latest Tech News, Product Reviews and Deals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:30:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Exynos 2100 &#038; Snapdragon 888 benchmark tests show the Exynos 2100 still lags behind</title>
		<link>https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/02/11/exynos-2100-snapdragon-888-benchmark-tests/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jed John Ikoba]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exynos 2100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exynos 2100 vs Snapdragon 888]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snapdragon 888]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gizmochina.com/?p=370620</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="180" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Exynos-2100-vs-Snapdragon-888-300x180.jpg?x96852" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Exynos 2100 vs Snapdragon 888" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Exynos-2100-vs-Snapdragon-888-300x180.jpg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Exynos-2100-vs-Snapdragon-888-696x419.jpg 696w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Exynos-2100-vs-Snapdragon-888-698x420.jpg 698w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Exynos-2100-vs-Snapdragon-888.jpg 720w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p>Samsung&#8216;s in-house chipset utilised on the Galaxy S20 series, the Exynos 990 was a disappointing chipset sort of, as it failed to match the Snapdragon 865. The Exynos 2100 was released as an improvement over the Exynos 990 and to take on the Snapdragon 888 with an improved power efficiency when compared to the previous [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/02/11/exynos-2100-snapdragon-888-benchmark-tests/">Exynos 2100 &amp; Snapdragon 888 benchmark tests show the Exynos 2100 still lags behind</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="180" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Exynos-2100-vs-Snapdragon-888-300x180.jpg?x96852" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Exynos 2100 vs Snapdragon 888" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Exynos-2100-vs-Snapdragon-888-300x180.jpg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Exynos-2100-vs-Snapdragon-888-696x419.jpg 696w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Exynos-2100-vs-Snapdragon-888-698x420.jpg 698w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Exynos-2100-vs-Snapdragon-888.jpg 720w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p><a href="http://gizmochina.com/tag/samsung">Samsung</a>&#8216;s in-house chipset utilised on the <a href="http://gizmochina.com/product/samsung-galaxy--s20">Galaxy S20 series</a>, the Exynos 990 was a disappointing chipset sort of, as it failed to match the Snapdragon 865. The Exynos 2100 was released as <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/02/02/benchmark-report-shows-the-exynos-2100-is-far-more-power-efficient-than-the-exynos-990/">an improvement over the Exynos 990</a> and to take on the Snapdragon 888 with an improved power efficiency when compared to the previous model. However, the chipset doesn&#8217;t seem to match up the capabilities of the Snapdragon 888.<a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark.png?x96852"><img loading="lazy" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-370647" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark.png?x96852" alt="" width="520" height="549" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark.png 520w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark-284x300.png 284w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark-398x420.png 398w" sizes="(max-width: 520px) 100vw, 520px" /></a></p>
<p>A holistic test result of the Exynos 2100 in comparison to the Snapdragon 888 in terms of the performance and power efficiency has now been published by the guys at <a href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/16463/snapdragon-888-vs-exynos-2100-galaxy-s21-ultra/4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">AnandTech</a>. The test was carried out using the two variants of the <a href="http://gizmochina.com/product/samsung-galaxy-s21-ultra">Galaxy S21 Ultra</a> running Exynos 2100 and Snapdragon 888 processors. The team performed several tests on both devices which suggest that Samsung’s 5nm (5LPE) fabrication process brings some improvements to the Exynos 2100 in terms of power efficiency compared to their predecessors.</p>
<p>However, the Exynos 2100 is on par with TSMC&#8217;s 7nm process (N7P) and doesn&#8217;t measure up to the more advanced 5nm process. As a result, Qualcomm&#8217;s SD888 fared better in many of the tasks than the Exynos 2100 and also consumes less power. The exynos 2100 throttles earlier than the Snapdragon 888 counterpart which then slows down the performance when the load is sustained.</p>

<a href='https://www.gizmochina.com/samsung-galaxy-s21-series-benchmark-2/'><img width="396" height="1024" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark-2-396x1024.png?x96852" class="attachment-large size-large" alt="" loading="lazy" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark-2-396x1024.png 396w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark-2-116x300.png 116w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark-2-163x420.png 163w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark-2.png 678w" sizes="(max-width: 396px) 100vw, 396px" /></a>
<a href='https://www.gizmochina.com/samsung-galaxy-s21-series-benchmark-3/'><img width="567" height="1024" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark-3-567x1024.png?x96852" class="attachment-large size-large" alt="" loading="lazy" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark-3-567x1024.png 567w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark-3-166x300.png 166w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark-3-232x420.png 232w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Samsung-Galaxy-S21-Series-benchmark-3.png 678w" sizes="(max-width: 567px) 100vw, 567px" /></a>

<p>The reviewer even kept the Galaxy S21 Ultra with an Exynos 2100 chip in a freezer and kept the Snapdragon 888 version in front of a fan while performing benchmark tests. Surprising, the two devices still output almost similar results. What this portends is that the Exynos 2100 will most likely throttle under real-world scenarios.</p>
<p>The benchmark tests also show that the Exynos 2100 has a higher power consumption of up to 18-35% compared to the Snapdragon 888. The battery life will bear the brunt of this high power consumption. Both PCMark Work 2.0 and web browsing battery life test confirm that the Galaxy S21 Ultra Snapdragon 888 version lasts longer on a single charge compared to the Exynos 2100 version of the same flagship phone.</p>
<p><strong>RELATED;</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/02/09/asus-rog-phone-5-with-snapdragon-888-and-16gb-ram-spotted-at-geekbench/">ASUS ROG Phone 5 with Snapdragon 888 and 16GB RAM spotted at Geekbench</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/02/09/samsung-galaxy-s21-gets-put-through-an-extreme-water-resistance-test-thats-lasted-more-than-a-week/">Samsung Galaxy S21 gets put through an extreme water resistance test that&#8217;s lasted more than a week</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/01/13/chip-battle-the-exynos-2100-challenges-the-snapdragon-888/">Chip Battle: The Exynos 2100 challenges the Snapdragon 888</a></li>
</ul>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="XIAOMI FAST LCD 144Hz Gaming Monitor Review: One of the best starter gaming display" width="696" height="392" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/35pENXIBSug?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/02/11/exynos-2100-snapdragon-888-benchmark-tests/">Exynos 2100 &amp; Snapdragon 888 benchmark tests show the Exynos 2100 still lags behind</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 33/75 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Content Delivery Network Full Site Delivery via cloudflare
Database Caching 6/31 queries in 0.011 seconds using Redis
Fragment Caching 2/3 fragments using Redis

Served from: www.gizmochina.com @ 2026-09-06 02:02:41 by W3 Total Cache
-->