<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Exynos 2200 GPU Archives - Gizmochina</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/exynos-2200-gpu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/exynos-2200-gpu/</link>
	<description>Latest Tech News, Product Reviews and Deals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:31:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Samsung&#8217;s Exynos 2200 only 5% faster than Exynos 2100, GPU uninspiring too</title>
		<link>https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/02/10/exynos-2200-5-faster-than-2100/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zohaib Ahmed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exynos 2200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exynos 2200 CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exynos 2200 GPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exynos 2200 NPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exynos 2200 performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Exynos 2200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Exynos 2200 benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Exynos 2200 vs 2100]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gizmochina.com/?p=442624</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-300x169.jpg?x44794" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Samsung Exynos 2200" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-696x392.jpg 696w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-1068x601.jpg 1068w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-747x420.jpg 747w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-1920x1080.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p>Samsung&#8217;s Exynos 2200 flagship processor has been the subject of much discussion lately, mostly due to its GPU that has been developed jointly with AMD. With raytracing promos making rounds, significant performance boosts were expected at least in the GPU department. However, new numbers from analyst TechAltar will push Exynos fans into a world of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/02/10/exynos-2200-5-faster-than-2100/">Samsung&#8217;s Exynos 2200 only 5% faster than Exynos 2100, GPU uninspiring too</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-300x169.jpg?x44794" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Samsung Exynos 2200" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-696x392.jpg 696w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-1068x601.jpg 1068w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-747x420.jpg 747w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-Featured-A-1920x1080.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p>Samsung&#8217;s Exynos 2200 flagship processor has been the subject of much discussion lately, mostly due to its GPU that has been developed jointly with AMD. With raytracing promos making rounds, significant performance boosts were expected at least in the GPU department. However, new numbers from analyst TechAltar will push Exynos fans into a world of disappointment. They reveal not only that the Exynos 2200 GPU is only marginally better than its predecessor, but the CPU is barely any faster either.</p>
<p>According to TechAltar (via <a href="https://wccftech.com/exynos-2200-abysmal-cpu-gpu-performance-vs-exynos-2100/?&amp;beta=1">Wccftech</a>), the octa-core CPU belonging to the latest SoC from <a href="http://gizmochina.com/tag/Samsung">Samsung</a> is only 5% faster compared to the cores in the Exynos 2100. This is obviously way below expectations &#8212; new-gen flagship SoCs typically bring about at least 15-20% improved performance and the Exynos 2200 is not even close to such figures.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
<p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Exynos 2200 numbers we got yesterday (vs. 2100) :<br /><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/72x72/1f53c.png" alt="🔼" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> 5% for CPU<br /><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/72x72/1f53c.png" alt="🔼" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> 17% for GPU <br /><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/72x72/1f53c.png" alt="🔼" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> 115% for NPU </p>
<p>No wonder they tried to cancel the dedicated Exynos launch event</p>
<p>&mdash; TechAltar (@TechAltar) <a href="https://twitter.com/TechAltar/status/1491454363923279873?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 9, 2022</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>Still, the blunder could have been forgivable had the chip made up for the shortcoming in its CPU through the AMD RDNA2-based Xclipse 920 GPU. When one mentions AMD, the company&#8217;s extensive and powerful desktop GPU lineup comes to mind. Surely, the Samsung-AMD partnership must&#8217;ve reaped great benefits?</p>
<p>Nope, because the same numbers claim that the GPU on the Exynos 2200 is only 17% faster compared to the one on the Exynos 2100.</p>
<p>This leaves nothing but the NPU, and thankfully, this unit has proven to be a true upgrade unlike the other two. A boost of <span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-poiln3 r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0">115% over the previous generation means that the NPU should result in faster processing times when it comes to operations like image processing.</span></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-438160 aligncenter" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-2.jpeg?x44794" alt="Samsung Exynos 2200 Chipset" width="1000" height="980" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-2.jpeg 1000w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-2-300x294.jpeg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-2-768x753.jpeg 768w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-2-696x682.jpeg 696w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Samsung-Exynos-2200-2-429x420.jpeg 429w" sizes="(max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px" /></p>
<p>But the question remains if this will translate to real-world performance improvements. TechAltar has pointed out that Samsung has kept performance metrics in the dark and even tried to cancel the dedicated Exynos launch event. This obviously means nothing good and Samsung could just be trying to hide its latest chip&#8217;s shortcomings.</p>
<p>All in all, Exynos looks to have been beaten by Snapdragon once again. &#8220;Qualcomm already had a better GPU and they made 50% improvements vs last gen, so they actually widened their lead, it seems,&#8221; says TechAltar.</p>
<p><strong>RELATED:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/02/10/samsung-promises-four-android-updates/">Samsung promises to offer four generations of Android OS updates for its devices</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/02/09/samsung-galaxy-s22-galaxy-s22-unveiled-with-120hz-display-30x-space-zoom-and-sd-8-gen-1/">Samsung Galaxy S22, Galaxy S22+ unveiled with 120Hz display, 30X Space Zoom, and SD 8 Gen 1</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/02/09/samsung-galaxy-s22-ultra-launch-s-pen-note-series/">Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra with S Pen deals a death blow to the Note series</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/02/09/samsung-galaxy-s22-s22-s22-ultra-variants-color-options-availability-leaked-before-launch/">Samsung Galaxy S22, S22+, S22 Ultra: India variants, color options, availability leaked before launch</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/02/09/samsung-galaxy-a51-demoted-to-biannual-updates/">Samsung Galaxy A51 demoted to biannual updates before Android 12 rollout</a></li>
</ul>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="Which Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Flagship Has The Best Performance And Gaming Experience?" width="696" height="392" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7tOzWcaffLQ?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/02/10/exynos-2200-5-faster-than-2100/">Samsung&#8217;s Exynos 2200 only 5% faster than Exynos 2100, GPU uninspiring too</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 36/45 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Content Delivery Network Full Site Delivery via cloudflare
Database Caching 16/25 queries in 0.005 seconds using Redis
Fragment Caching 2/3 fragments using Redis

Served from: www.gizmochina.com @ 2026-06-23 12:52:09 by W3 Total Cache
-->