Meta Platforms, the parent company of social media giants Facebook and Instagram, has been accused of copyright infringement, leading to a consolidated lawsuit from notable authors such as Sarah Silverman and Michael Chabon. The crux of the accusation lies in Meta’s purported use of thousands of copyrighted books without proper authorization to train its artificial intelligence language model, Llama.

Despite stern warnings from Meta’s legal team about the potential legal risks associated with using pirated books for AI training, the company allegedly proceeded with the contentious dataset. The legal confusion gained further complexity as evidence from chat logs surfaced, featuring Meta-affiliated researcher Tim Dettmers discussing the procurement of the dataset in a Discord server.

According to the chat logs, Dettmers engaged in conversations with Meta’s legal department, highlighting concerns about the legality of employing book files for training data. The legal team reportedly cautioned against immediate use, citing issues related to “books with active copyrights.” Participants in the chat debated whether training on such data could be justified under the fair use doctrine, a U.S. legal principle protecting certain unlicensed uses of copyrighted works.

Originally initiated over the summer, the lawsuit was recently consolidated, combining two separate legal actions against Meta. Recent developments in the case include a California judge dismissing part of the Silverman lawsuit last month, prompting authors to seek amendments to their claims, indicating an evolving legal situation.

The implications of this legal battle extend beyond Meta, with potential repercussions throughout the AI industry. Success in these lawsuits could increase the cost of developing data-hungry AI models, as companies may face heightened scrutiny and compensation demands from content creators. Furthermore, new regulatory rules in Europe could compel AI companies, including Meta, to disclose the data used to train their models, exposing them to additional legal risks.

Meta’s Llama models, particularly the latest version, Llama 2, released in the summer, are at the center of the controversy. While the first version was trained using the “Books3 section of ThePile,” details about the training data for Llama 2, a potential disruptor in the market for generative AI software, were not disclosed by Meta.

Related:

• Meta’s new AI Image Generator Trained on Your 1.1 Billion Social Media Photos
• Meta exposes massive China-based networks on Social Media
• Ex Twitter employee accused of helping Saudi Arabia Spy

(via)

The post Meta faces Copyright Infringement allegations over AI training dataset appeared first on Gizmochina.

In a significant legal development, 33 U.S. states, including California and New York, have filed a lawsuit against Meta Platforms, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook. The lawsuit accuses Meta of fueling a youth mental health crisis by creating addictive social media platforms. According to the complaint filed in a federal court in California, Meta allegedly misled the public about the dangers of its platforms, knowingly inducing young children and teenagers into addictive and compulsive social media use.

This development follows a series of lawsuits against social media giants, including Meta, ByteDance’s TikTok, and Google’s YouTube, concerning the addictive nature of their platforms. Meta, the parent company of Instagram, faces civil penalties ranging from $1,000 to $50,000 for each violation of state laws, potentially amounting to significant financial repercussions due to the millions of young users on Instagram.

At the core of these accusations is the allegation that Meta prioritizes profit over the safety and well-being of its users, particularly young individuals. The lawsuits highlight Meta’s alleged knowledge that social media engagement, particularly through features like “likes,” triggers addictive responses in young users due to dopamine-related pleasure. 

Additionally, Meta’s attempts to expand these harmful practices into virtual reality, including platforms like Horizon Worlds, WhatsApp, and Messenger, have come under scrutiny. The legal action by these states aims to address the regulatory gaps left by the U.S. Congress, emphasizing the urgent need to address the mental and physical health risks posed by social media platforms.

The lawsuit contends that Meta has profoundly impacted the psychological and social realities of young Americans by employing technologies designed to entice and ensnare youth for profit. The platforms are accused of maximizing children’s and teenagers’ screen time through psychologically manipulative features, leading to detrimental outcomes such as depression, anxiety, insomnia, and interference with education and daily life.

Instagram, the third-most-popular social media platform among teenagers, with 62% of teenagers aged 13 to 17 reportedly using it, has come under intense scrutiny. Meta is alleged to have used deceptive tactics, claiming their products were safe while engaging in practices that encouraged addictive behavior in young users. Meta responded to the lawsuit expressing disappointment, stating that instead of collaborating with the industry to establish clear, age-appropriate standards, the attorney general had chosen legal action.

This lawsuit follows a trend of legal challenges against social media companies regarding the harm their platforms may inflict on younger users. As the case unfolds, it raises questions about the ethical responsibility of tech giants in safeguarding the well-being of their youngest users amid the digital age’s growing influence.

Related:

• Meta is Finally Updating Instagram and Facebook with Android’s Themed Icons
• TikTok Addresses Misleading & Violent Content from Israel-Hamas Conflict
• Meta considering ad-free versions of Instagram and Facebook in Europe

(via)

The post Instagram contributes to Youth Mental Health issues like Depression and Anxiety, alleges Lawsuit appeared first on Gizmochina.