Samsung Display has scored a significant victory in its legal dispute with Chinese display maker BOE. The US International Trade Commission (ITC) ruled in favor of Samsung, finding that BOE had infringed on three of its OLED-related patents.

The ruling comes after Samsung accused BOE and other companies of patent infringement in December 2022. While the ITC has yet to impose a ban on BOE’s products, the preliminary decision gives Samsung a strong advantage as the case moves towards a final verdict in March 2025.

This legal battle is part of a broader strategic move by Samsung to maintain its dominance in the display technology market. Earlier this year, Samsung severed its business ties with BOE, a major supplier of LCD panels. This decision not only impacts BOE’s revenue but also signals Samsung’s commitment to protecting its intellectual property.

The impact of this case extends beyond Samsung and BOE. For Samsung, the ITC ruling solidifies its position as a leader in OLED technology and serves as a warning to competitors. BOE, on the other hand, faces potential financial challenges due to the loss of Samsung as a customer.

The broader display industry is also affected. Companies like LG Display, Sharp, and AUO stand to benefit from Samsung’s shift away from BOE. LG Display, in particular, is ramping up production to capitalize on the increased demand.

The outcome of the ITC’s final decision in 2025 will have far-reaching consequences. For Samsung, a favorable ruling could further strengthen its market position. For BOE, the challenge lies in mitigating the impact of the legal case and the loss of a major customer.

(via)

The post ITC Ruling Favors Samsung in OLED Patent Battle with BOE, US Import Ban Still in Play appeared first on Gizmochina.

Apple, known for its cutting-edge technology, recently faced a significant hurdle with its smartwatch line, the Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2. The US International Trade Commission (ITC) had imposed a ban on the sale of these products, citing patent infringement. This decision, based on a lawsuit by medical device maker Masimo, threatened Apple’s $17 billion smartwatch business. However, an appellate court in Washington has now provided a temporary respite, lifting the ban and allowing Apple to resume sales.

Masimo is filing a lawsuit against Apple citing a patent infringement

The conflict began when Masimo accused Apple of infringing patents related to blood-oxygen saturation measurement technology. This led to the ITC’s decision to ban the import and sale of certain Apple Watch models. The move was significant, as it forced Apple to halt sales just before Christmas, a peak shopping season. Despite the White House’s 60-day review period, the ban was not vetoed, adding to Apple’s challenges.

Apple’s response has been multifaceted. While challenging the ITC’s decision, the company also developed a software update, potentially mitigating the patent infringement issue. This update is under review, with a decision expected soon. Meanwhile, the appellate court’s temporary lift of the ban is a welcome development for Apple. The company’s statement highlights its commitment to developing industry-leading health and wellness technologies.

This situation underscores the complex interplay between innovation, patent rights, and market competition. Apple’s struggle to defend its product and intellectual property rights against Masimo’s claims highlights the challenges tech companies face in a highly competitive and legally intricate environment. The outcome of this legal battle will be closely watched, as it could have significant implications for how tech companies innovate and protect their inventions in the future.

For now, Apple fans can rejoice as the coveted smartwatches return to shelves, but the overarching story is far from over. The final decision on the appeal and the impact of the software update will determine the future course for Apple’s smartwatch line and perhaps set a precedent in the tech industry’s ongoing patent disputes.

RELATED:

• Apple may launch a new Vision Pro featuring RGB OLEDoS in 2027
• Apple Watch import ban takes effect in U.S. following regulatory decision
• Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro Genshin Impact Special Edition up for sale
• Best iPhone 15 Pro cases for 2023: Dbrand, Spigen, RhinoShield & More

(Via)

The post Apple’s Smartwatches Return to the Shelves – Temporarily appeared first on Gizmochina.

When it comes to intellectual property rights, theft is a much more complex issue than the physical theft of an object. Therefore, courts have often become a battlefield where seemingly simple cases can turn into years-long struggles. Nevertheless, many companies find themselves frequently in the position of either defendant or plaintiff in court.

Currently, a similar development is unfolding between Xiaomi and Huawei. The two companies are engaged in a legal battle, appearing before a judge in a copyright infringement case, with Xiaomi accusing a Huawei executive of misrepresenting facts in their smartphone patent dispute. Here are the details….

Huawei Takes Legal Action Against Xiaomi Over Foldable Smartphone Patents

Huawei recently filed a lawsuit against Xiaomi, claiming that the patents related to foldable smartphone hinges had been violated. However, Xiaomi denied the allegations, instead accusing the plaintiff’s representative of misrepresenting facts and politely making false accusations. The patent in question, known as the “dragon bone” technology in foldable phones, is claimed by the defendant to have been independently developed and patented.

In its defense, Xiaomi emphasized significant differences between the two patents, stating that there are substantial distinctions. They even went on to say, “We urge Yu to follow ‘basic scientific and rigorous standards’ and stop unfairly criticizing competitors or misleading the public in the future.” This technology made its debut in the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 model, with its hinge mechanism particularly drawing attention. It seems that this innovation caught Huawei’s attention.

Unfortunately, the outcome of the patent dispute between the two companies remains uncertain for now. While it’s challenging to determine the truth and who is right in such cases, as mentioned earlier, patent lawsuits are complex processes. Especially in situations like these, they can drag on for years and lead to significant legal expenses. Hence, parties involved often prefer to reach an agreement in such cases. This could also be the case for Xiaomi and Huawei, but without following developments, it’s impossible to say anything definitive.

RELATED:

• Best smart luggage of 2023: Modobag, Weego, Incase & More
• Alldocube iWork GT 12: AMD 2-in-1 laptop, $100 off and free keyboard
• Aoostar R1 N100:  Intel N100 NAS / Mini PC with Windows 11 for $219
• Lenovo Legion Y700 2023: Save $100 on this 8-inch gaming Android tablet

(via)

The post Xiaomi Accuses Huawei Executive of Lying and Misrepresenting Facts appeared first on Gizmochina.

Patent cases are an essential foundation of the technology industry. Today, almost 100% of the companies we mention on Gizmochina have been involved in a patent case in one way or another. The latest example of this is a legal dispute between Lenovo and Asus. The Chinese tech giant has filed a lawsuit against its Taiwanese rival for patent infringement. The filed documents in court include allegations related to software, hardware, and connectivity in multiple products. Here are the details…

Lenovo Seeks US Ban on Asus ZenBook Laptops

Lenovo claims that Asus has been using its patented technologies without permission. These technologies include a method for reducing data transmission steps, a wireless wake-on LAN power management technique, a two finger diagonal scrolling feature, and a hinge design that allows a laptop to convert into a tablet.

In response, Lenovo has filed a lawsuit against Asus in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, seeking damages for lost profits and an injunction preventing Asus from further using its patented technologies. Lenovo has also requested the US International Trade Commission (ITC) to issue a limited exclusion order barring the import of Asus products that infringe on its patents into the United States.

Asus has not yet responded to Lenovo’s lawsuit, but Lenovo has stated that it is willing to negotiate a cross-licensing agreement with Asus to resolve the dispute. However, Asus has so far declined this offer. The outcome of this legal battle will have significant implications for both companies. If Lenovo prevails, Asus will be forced to either stop using the disputed technologies or pay Lenovo royalties for their use. This could potentially damage Asus’s reputation and market position.

On the other hand, if Asus wins, it will be able to continue using the technologies without any restrictions. Unfortunately, we have no choice but to wait to see who will win.

RELATED:

• Download the best GCam APK for Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
• Get $100 Discount on Alldocube iWork GT 12 at Geekwills (Coupon)
• Get the latest Xiaomi 14 smartphone for $599 at Geekwills
• Get $100 OFF on Lenovo Legion Y700 2023 Gamin Tablet at Giztop

(via)

The post Lenovo’s Patent War with Asus Could Lead to Ban on ZenBook Laptops appeared first on Gizmochina.

ASUS has just filed a new lawsuit against Samsung. The company is alleging that the South Korean tech giant has infringed on its wireless communication technology patents that are based on 4G and 5G networking.

ASUS lawsuit targets 4G/5G smartphones like the Galaxy Z Flip 5

The news arrives from a DigiTimes report. ASUS is apparently suing Samsung because it violated its wireless communications technology on smartphones like the Galaxy Z Flip 5. The Taiwanese electronics maker filed the lawsuit after it failed to reach an agreement regarding the licensing fees for its patent with Samsung. The patent was filed by the ASUS Technology Licensing and Innovative Sonic Limited, which owns all of the brand’s patents. This lawsuit was filed against Samsung Electronics in the Eastern District of Texas (U.S. Patent No. 10,187,878).

The patent describes a “method and apparatus for improving a transmission using a configured resource in a wireless communication system” and even mentions Samsung’s 4G and 5G smartphones. According to RPX Insight, the patent is a standard essential patent and the patent will usually take years before the lawsuit gets settled. It remains to be seen what actions both companies will take now. So stick around for more as we will be providing updates when additional information is available regarding this matter.

RELATED:

• Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Leaked 360 Degree Video Reveals A Boxy Design
• Galaxy Wearable app seemingly confirms Galaxy Ring name, slated to launch in 2024
• Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 surfaces on GeekBench with Helio G99 & 4GB RAM
• Samsung Inadvertently Confirms the Galaxy S23 FE, appears in Samsung Pay Support List
• Samsung Galaxy S24 series spotted on 3C certification with fast charging details
• iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: Specs Comparison
• Best Smart Shoes of 2023 – Adidas, Under Armour & More

(Via)

The post Samsung sued by ASUS over 4G & 5G patent infringement appeared first on Gizmochina.

A while ago Huawei sued Xiaomi for alleged infringement of four of its patents related to wireless communication technology, smartphone photography, and screen lock technology. The two companies were locked in a patent dispute for several years, and now, the case was finally settled in 2022. As part of the settlement, Huawei and Xiaomi agreed to a global patent cross-licensing deal. Here are the details…

Huawei and Xiaomi Not to Sue Each Other for Patent Infringement for 10 Years

Huawei and Xiaomi announced on Wednesday that they have reached a global patent cross-licensing deal. The deal covers multiple communications technologies, including 5G. The deal is a significant development for both companies. Huawei is the world’s leading telecom equipment maker and a major player in the smartphone market. And as you know, Xiaomi is the world’s third-largest smartphone maker.

The terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it is likely that both companies will benefit from the agreement. Huawei will gain access to Xiaomi’s patents, which will help it to develop new products and services. Xiaomi will also benefit from the deal, as it will no longer have to pay patent licensing fees to Huawei.

The deal is also will help both companies to develop 5G products and services. The deal is expected to take effect in early 2024. This means that the deal will not be finalized until then. However, it is likely that the deal will be finalized as planned, as both companies have expressed their commitment to the agreement. The agreement will be in effect for 10 years. After that, the two companies may choose to renew the agreement or negotiate a new one.

RELATED:

• Vivo X Flip vs OPPO Find N3 Flip: Specs Comparison
• China’s emerging middle class shows preference for Huawei over Apple and Vivo
• Huawei expected to launch another smartwatch alongside Watch GT 4 series on Sept 14
• Huawei Nova 12 series with this new Kirin chip could be in works
• Top Tech News From Last Week: Huawei’s Success, iPhone 15 leaks, Pixel 8 Leaks &…

(via)

The post Huawei and Xiaomi Resolve Patent Dispute with Global Cross-Licensing Deal appeared first on Gizmochina.

In a recent legal battle, Alphabet’s Google has been found guilty of violating a software developer’s patent rights related to remote-streaming technology. A federal jury in Waco, Texas, handed down the verdict on Friday, ordering Google to pay $338.7 million in damages to Touchstream Technologies, a New York-based software company also known as Shodogg.

The lawsuit was filed by Touchstream Technologies from New York, which is now $338.7 million richer

The lawsuit, filed in 2021, alleged that Google’s popular Chromecast and other devices infringed upon Touchstream’s patents, which pertain to the technology that allows users to stream videos from one screen to another. The technology was reportedly invented by Touchstream’s founder, David Strober, in 2010, with the goal of seamlessly “moving” videos from small devices like smartphones to larger screens like televisions.

According to Touchstream’s complaint, Google had a meeting with the company in December 2011 to discuss their technology but later showed no interest. Surprisingly, Google introduced its Chromecast media-streaming devices in 2013, which Touchstream claimed were copied from their innovations and infringed upon three of their patents. Additionally, Touchstream alleged that Google’s Home and Nest smart speakers, as well as third-party televisions and speakers with Chromecast capabilities, also infringed upon their patents.

Google’s spokesperson, Jose Castaneda, responded to the verdict, stating that the company will appeal and firmly asserting that Google has always developed its technology independently and competed based on the merits of its ideas. On the other side, Touchstream’s attorney, Ryan Dykal, expressed satisfaction with the verdict, affirming that they believe in the strength of their case.

This legal battle is not an isolated incident for Touchstream, as earlier this year, they filed similar complaints against major cable providers, including Comcast, Charter, and Altice, also in Texas. Those cases are still pending resolution.

As the legal drama unfolds, industry experts and technology enthusiasts alike are keeping a close eye on the outcome. The ruling may have significant implications for the tech giant, potentially affecting the development and release of future products, and could also set a precedent for future patent infringement cases in the technology sector.

The appeal process will undoubtedly be closely monitored, and both companies will prepare to defend their positions vigorously. In the end, the final verdict may shape the landscape of intellectual property rights in the sector of digital streaming.

RELATED:

• Google Pixel Watch 2 could be lighter but less durable with an aluminum case
• Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI Unite for Responsible AI Development
• Best Lenovo Ideapad Slim 3 alternatives in 2023

(Via)

The post Google Found Guilty of Patent Infringement, Faces $338.7 Million in Damages appeared first on Gizmochina.

In a legal clash, Sonos has dealt a decisive blow to tech giant Google, resulting in a whopping $32.5 million penalty for infringing on Sonos’ patent. The case was built around Sonos’ patent that enables synchronized audio playback across multiple speakers, a core feature of Sonos’ technology for years.

The court, however, dismissed four other Patent Infringement Claims against Google

US District Judge William Alsup had previously ruled against Google, stating that early versions of their products, such as Chromecast Audio and Google Home, violated Sonos’ patent. However, the recent trial assessed whether Google’s later products continued to infringe on Sonos’ patent. To Sonos’ delight, the jury sided firmly with the audio technology company. Nevertheless, the jury found no violation regarding a second patent concerning device control via smartphones or other devices, as Sonos failed to convincingly establish that the Google Home app infringed upon it. Notably, the court dismissed four other patent infringement claims filed by Sonos.

Google responded by highlighting that the dispute focused on specific features with limited usage. The tech giant clarified that out of the six patents initially asserted by Sonos, only one was deemed infringed, while the remaining patents were either invalidated or found non-infringing. Google reiterated its commitment to independent technological development and fair competition based on idea merit. The company is currently evaluating its options and considering the next steps to take.

Sonos expressed profound gratitude for the jury’s decision, recognizing their dedication in upholding the validity of Sonos’ patents and acknowledging the value of Sonos’ pioneering invention of zone scenes. Sonos portrayed Google as a serial infringer of their patent portfolio, citing a previous ruling by the International Trade Commission that found Google in violation of five other Sonos patents. Sonos contends that Google infringes on over 200 of their patents, with the damages awarded in this case emphasizing the value of their intellectual property. Sonos remains resolute in seeking a fair royalty from Google for the use of their inventions.

The outcome of the Sonos vs. Google lawsuit represents a significant victory for Sonos. The ongoing legal battle between the two companies is likely to continue, with unresolved lawsuits and potential appeals on the horizon. This case serves as a reminder of the complexities and high stakes involved in intellectual property disputes within the tech industry. Earlier this month, Google had to pay $39.9 million for a location-tracking lawsuit as well.

RELATED:

• Google is Killing the Feature from Instagram That It Stole from Snapchat
• Google already ran out of 512GB Pixel Fold in the US
• Best Play Store Deals – Apps and Games on Sale this Week

(Via)

The post Google Slapped with $32.5 Million Fine for Patent Infringement against Sonos appeared first on Gizmochina.

Earlier this week, Google managed to convince a US court for an appeal worth multi million over a patent infringement dispute regarding the technology on its Chrome browser. The company managed to cancel three anti malware patents infringement case that were worth 20 million US Dollars.

For those unaware, Cioffi and the late Rozman’s daughters filed a lawsuit against the Search Engine giant over anti malware technology that it employed on its popular web browser, Google Chrome. The claimed that the technology that prevents malware from accessing critical files on your computer in the browser infringed on their patents. Thus, a jury decided that Google had infringed on the patents and awarded the plaintiffs a 20 million US Dollar along with ongoing royalties back in 2017.

Their attorney had revealed back then that this expected amount would total to about 7 million US Dollars per year for the next nine years. However, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit stated that Alfonso Cioffi and Allen Rozman’s patents are invalid since they contained technologies that were not originally included in an earlier version of the patent.

The Federal Circuit also added that the all of the patents were invalid since the three patents that were reissued were based on a previous anti malware patent. In other words, federal law required the new patents to cover the same invention. Furthermore, the appeals court added that the new patents were specifically related to the browser technology, which were details not included in the first patent.

RELATED:

• Google Pixel 7A Leaked Pricing Suggests It Might Cost More Than The Pixel 6A
• Google removes 36 malicious android apps from Play Store with over 100 million downloads
• Google reportedly working on a new AI powered search engine
• Here’s Probably Why You Should Avoid Buying Samsung ACs in India
• Redmi Note 12s vs Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G: Specs Comparison

(Source)

The post Google wins $20 million appeal over patent dispute for its Chrome tech appeared first on Gizmochina.

Apple has recently been dealing with another legal dispute regarding the technology it offers. The latest one is another patent infringement case, which might affect the sale of its Apple Watch series in the US. So here are all the details.

The Cupertino based giant is no stranger with patent disputes. However, the latest battle has started off against the iPhone maker and could possibly even lead to the ban of the Apple Watch Series 6 and newer models in the US. The company is being sued by Masimo, which is a brand that medical grade products. As per the new lawsuit, the company is suing Apple for breaking five of its pulse oximeters, which is used on the Watch’s blood oxygen monitoring feature on its Watch Series 6 and later models.

Just yesterday, a judge in the US International Trade Commission (ITC) ruled that Apple did break one of Masimo’s pulse oximeter patents. Meaning, the company wasn’t guilty on infringing on the other four patents. So now, the US ITC will decide if it will ban the import of Apple Watch models that can monitor blood oxygen levels of its users. According to Masimo CEO Joe Kiani ““We are happy that the judge recognized Apple’s infringement of Masimo’s pulse oximetry technology and took this critical first step toward accountability.”

The senior official further added that “Today’s decision should help restore fairness in the market. Apple has similarly infringed on other companies’ technologies, and we believe today’s ruling exposes Apple as a company that takes other companies’ innovations and repackages them.” On the other hand, Apple responded by stating that “We respectfully disagree with today’s decision and look forward to a full review by the Commission.”

RELATED:

• Apple working on custom MicroLED tech that may debut on the Apple Watch
• Apple Issues Second macOS Ventura Beta Rapid Security Response Update
• Apple To Start Transitioning Away From Qualcomm Modem Chips Next Year

(Via)

The post Apple Watch may face a ban in the US over its Blood Oxygen tracking feature appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung is facing another legal battle over alleged patent violation. The company has been sued by a patent troll over the use of an algorithm that predicts the remaining battery life on its Android smartphones.

The South Korean tech giant is being sued by a company called K. Mizra LLC. For those unaware, a patent troll is basically a term used to describe an entity that acquires and collects patents. Rather than using the technology described in the patents, these companies generate revenue by using “aggressive” litigation and legal battles based on patents. Now, K. Mirzra claims that Samsung infringed on its patent that is related to smartphone battery technology.

The lawsuit was filed against the South Korean company on May 20 in the Dusseldorf Regional Court in Germany. As per the accusation, K. Mizra’s “battery runtime prediction as implemented in Samsung devices using younger versions of the Android OS infringes the German designation of its patent EP 2 174 201 B1.” In other words, the company infringed on a patent that describes an algorithm that can analyze users’ behaviors to predict the remaining battery life of the smartphone.

This also enables the handset to showcase a more precise battery life estimate as well. Thus, K. Mizra claims that this Android based feature on Samsung Galaxy devices are based on the inventions covered in its patents. It remains to be seen how the patent dispute plays out. So stick around for more updates as we will be provide more updates if there are any notable developments with this case.

RELATED:

• Samsung’s first 5G smartphone demoted to quarterly updates
• Samsung Wireless Charger+ trademark filing spotted on EUIPO website
• Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra concept video showcases 200MP camera module
• Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4, Z Flip, Watch 5 series launch date, color variants tipped

The post Samsung faces lawsuit over algorithm that predicts remaining battery life on phones appeared first on Gizmochina.

Canadian smartphone manufacturer BlackBerry has sold its legacy patents covering mobile technologies to Catapult IP Innovations Inc. for $600 million. The company has disclosed that the sale consists of all its non-core patent assets.

According to a report by AppleInsider, this move from BlackBerry may spell trouble for other smartphone companies like Apple who may be subject to patent trolling in the future.

The concern arises as the Cupertino-based giant has been sued multiple times in the past for alleged BlackBerry patent infringements and the patents are now being sold to Catapult IP Innovations Inc. which could be considered a nonpracticing entity (NPE).

For those unaware, a patent troll is a derogatory term used to describe a business that utilizes patents and the court system to earn money. In other words, the company may use the patents it acquired from the deal with BlackBerry to demand royalties or outright sue other smartphone manufacturers for patent infringement.

BlackBerry will get $450 million dollars in cash, a promissory note for $150 million as well as the license for using the patents. In return, Catapult IP Innovations Inc. will acquire BlackBerry’s patents related to mobile devices, messaging, and wireless networking IPs. BlackBerry specifically says that the sale will not affect customers using its products or services.

The company says the deal will need to satisfy all regulatory conditions under the Hart–Scott–Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act in the United States and the Investment Canada Act, which could take up to 210 days.

RELATED:

• Samsung faces another lawsuit from a European Patent Troll
• BlackBerry 5G phone with keyboard confirmed to launch this year
• BlackBerry has officially ended support for all of its classic smartphones

(Source)

The post Patent troll acquires $600 million worth of patents from BlackBerry appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung Electronics has just been hit with a new lawsuit. The legal dispute is allegedly over a patent infringement in the US. This lawsuit was filed by a European patent troll.

According to a BusinessKorea report, the lawsuit was filed by the Dublin based Scramoge Technology, which is a non practicing entity (NPE). The firm filed a patent infringement against the South Korean tech giant with the US District Court in Texas earlier this month. Scramoge Technology alleged that the brand has launched new products using its wireless charging technology without permission. This news arrives after the NPE purchased 123 patents related to wireless charging from LG Innotek back in 2021.

For those unaware, a patent troll is a derogatory term used to describe a business that utilize patents and the court system to earn money. In other words, the company is using the patents it acquired from LG Innotek to sue Samsung. It had previously filed a similar lawsuit against the South Korean brand back in April 2021, and another one back August 2021. Those legal disputes were over the alleged infringement of the company’s newly launched Galaxy Z Flip3 and Galaxy Z Fold3 foldable phones.

Now, Scramoge Technology is stating that Samsung infringed on seven of its wireless charging patents, which included short range communication antenna solutions as well. Furthermore, the NPE has also filed for damages as it claims that the known consumer electronics maker caused damages to its business by selling its patented products in the US. As of right now, industry insiders believe that Samsung might face a difficult legal battle considering Scramoge Technology’s parent company is Atlantic IP Services, which is apparently known for being an infamous patent troll group.

RELATED:

• Samsung’s new security chip adds a fingerprint scanner to payment cards
• Google Pixel Notepad foldable smartphone to cost significantly lower than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
• Samsung Unpacked event, Google Foldable details, End of OnePlus 6T support, and more from Last Week

The post Samsung faces another lawsuit from a European Patent Troll appeared first on Gizmochina.

A couple of months ago, in July this year, Nokia had filed a few patent-related lawsuits against OPPO. Now, as a retaliation, the Chinese company has filed several patents infringement lawsuits against Nokia in China and Europe.

The patents involved in the lawsuit are all 5G standard essential patents. With the commercialization of 5G technology, the essential patent licensing rates between patent owners and smartphone makers have been rising.

Nokia, the Finnish company that just settled the patent dispute with Daimler, is pushing ahead to enter the 5G field. It intends to take advantage of the patent war with OPPO to lay the groundwork for 5G standard-essential patent fees.

Over the last ten years, Nokia has sued several different companies but this is likely the first time in the last decade to file a counter sued for patent infringement. This is due to a lack of high-quality assets or the lack of courage to confront Nokia head-on.

In July this year, Nokia filed dozens of patent infringement lawsuits against OPPO in about nine countries, including India, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. While the reason behind this move hasn’t been announced, it’s likely that the companies failed to reach an agreement for the 5G patent license.

Ever since Nokia stopped making mobile phones (HMD Global has licensed Nokia brand for smartphones), the patent license fees play an important role for the Finland-based company. It is trying to find a foothold in the telecom equipment market and with Huawei facing several issues, there’s a greater chance for Nokia to get a majority of contracts.

Nokia has adopted the strategy of aggressive litigation to collect the licensing fees. Before OPPO, the company had filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Lenovo in the US, Brazil, India, Germany, and others. It lasted for more than a year and was settled by the companies earlier this year in April.

It will be interesting to see how this legal dispute ends. While there’s a high possibility of both the companies reached an agreement, the battle between the patent holder and license holder for using it could form new rules for the companies.

RELATED: 

• OPPO ColorOS 12 based on Android 12 confirmed to launch in September
• OPPO foldable phone rumored to launch soon with an LTPO display
• OPPO K3 gets access to ColorOS 11 (Android 11) stable update in India
• Vivo and OPPO phones with Dimensity 810 are likely to launch in September  

The post OPPO files 5G patent infringement lawsuits against Nokia in China and Europe appeared first on Gizmochina.

Back in January 2020, we had reported on Apple being accused of stealing Health Monitoring technology for its smartwatch. Now, this lawsuit battle has been waging for nearly two years with no end in sight.According to a Bloomberg report, the Cupertino based giant has denied Masimo’s accusations of stealing its trade secrets for the Apple Watch. Masimo CEO, Joe Kiani, has stated that “I’ve been through three major litigations,” but he believes that the known smartphone maker is taking this battle to another level. He further added that the company is “refusing to even play by the rules set by the court.” Meanwhile, Masimo, a signal processing technology maker for health care monitors, accused the brand of stealing its trade secrets through the hiring of one of its former executives.

The legal battle has been stalled for nearly two years, as the iPhone maker challenges the validity of the patent and disputes over access to information. Kiani said that these delays had prompted him to file a complaint with the International Trade Commission (ITC) to block the imports of the Watch Series 6 as well. For those unaware, Apple had hired Masimo’s chief technology officer, Marcelo Lamego, at Cercacor (Masimo’s subsidiary) and had allegedly filed new patents under his own name that were previously filed by Masimo.

Furthermore, Kiani also stated that Apple’s CEO Tim Cook might have been personally involved in the hiring of the Cercacor executive as well. Kiani added that “Patents began publishing with Marcelo Lamego as inventor. He had patented things, some of the things we had done 20 years ago and were in our products. This was worse than we thought. That’s when we first sued Apple.”

RELATED:

• Apple iPhone X survives an 11,000 feet fall from a plane unscathed
• Apple Watch Series 7 rumored to arrive in larger 41mm and 45mm sizes
• Samsung Exynos 2200 with AMD mRDNA GPU beats Apple A14 in benchmarks

The post Apple denies stealing trade secrets, while Masimo CEO accuses Tim Cook appeared first on Gizmochina.

Huawei Technologies, the China-based tech giant and the leading telecommunications equipment manufacturer, and the U.S.-based Verizon Communications have agreed to settle the lawsuits alleging patent infringement.

The settlement for the two lawsuits, details of which remain confidential, comes days after trial for one of them opened. Huawei and Verizon filed joint motions to dismiss both cases and Verizon’s counterclaims late on Sunday in two U.S. courts in Texas.

In a statement, Verizon said it was “happy with the settlement reached with Huawei involving patent lawsuits. While terms of the settlement are not being disclosed, our team did an outstanding job bringing this protracted matter to a close.” On the other hand, Huawei said in a statement it was “pleased that Verizon and Huawei reached an agreement that ends the companies’ patent litigation.”

For those who are unaware, in February last year, Huawei sued Verizon alleging that the network operator used a dozen Huawei patents without authorization in areas such as computer networking, download security, and video communications. It was seeking an unspecified amount of compensation and royalty payments.

A year prior to that, Huawei told Verizon it should pay licensing fees for use of more than 230 Huawei patents and was seeking more than $1 billion.

Huawei has been caught up in the middle of the US-China trade war and the company has been included in United States’ Entity List for more than two years now. It basically bans the company from doing business with American firms or using its technologies.

RELATED: 

• Huawei is reportedly working on a smartphone with 90W fast charging
• Huawei Band 6 Review: An excellent Smart Band with Spo2 tracking
• Huawei quietly discontinues the 12GB RAM variants of PORSCHE DESIGN HUAWEI Mate40 RS

The post Huawei and Verizon agrees to settle patent infringement lawsuits appeared first on Gizmochina.

Nokia is one of the early players in the mobile phone industry and thus, the Finland-based company holds multiple patents that it licenses to other companies. To protect its intellectual property, it sues those who use the patented work without permission.

In line with that, Nokia has now sued the Chinese smartphone company OPPO for patent infringement in four countries — England, France, Germany, and India.

As per the report, OPPO has refused to renew the licensing agreement that allows the use of certain patents. Nokia had signed the agreement with the Chinese company back in the year 2018. It appears that Nokia is using the same legal teams that won the previous patent enforcement campaign against Lenovo and Daimler.

In its official statement, Nokia said that there have been negotiations between the two companies, but OPPO decided to go on its own and rejected all offers. It says: “We have been negotiating the renewal of our patent licensing agreement with Oppo but unfortunately they have rejected our fair and reasonable offers. Litigation is always our last resort and we have offered to enter into independent and neutral arbitration to amicably resolve the matter. We still believe this would be the most constructive way forward.”

On the other hand, OPPO says that Nokia’s action in the matter is “shocking” and has accused the Finnish company of dishonouring the patent licensing under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms.

It’s noteworthy that the issue is not related to the Nokia’s OZO Audio Technology which OPPO has been using on several of its smartphones, including the Find X series and the Reno series. The exact patents of Nokia that OPPO is infringing has not been disclosed.

RELATED: 

• Nokia unveils the BH-805 Noise Cancelling TWS Earbuds in Europe priced at €99.99
• Nokia tipped to launch a new flagship smartphone in China before November 11
• OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G price in India emerge through unboxing video
• Huawei files lawsuit against Verizon in the US over patent infringement

The post Nokia sues Chinese smartphone maker OPPO for patent infringement appeared first on Gizmochina.

Huawei Technologies has filed a lawsuit against Verizon Communications. The smartphone and telecommunications equipment maker has sued the US carrier over allegedly infringing on its patents, with the jury selection beginning today (7th July 2021).

According to a Reuters report, the Chinese tech giant had initially filed the lawsuit against Verizon back in February 2020. These were filed in two US District Courts in Texas and alleged that Verizon used the brand’s patents without its authorization in multiple areas. This includes computer networking, download security, and video communications. Huawei is currently seeking an unknown amount for compensation along with royalty payments as well.

Notably, the US telecom operator had called this lawsuit as “nothing more than a PR stunt” and a “sneak attack on our company and the entire tech ecosystem.” Furthermore, the carrier also filed counterclaims against Huawei, stating that the Chinese company had also violated Verizon’s patents as well. The smartphone maker had added last year that it “is simply asking that Verizon respect Huawei’s investment in research and development by either paying for the use of our patents, or refraining from using them.”

At the moment, the company has denied to further comment on this matter. Meanwhile, the news arrives amid growing trade and political tensions between the US and China. The jury selection process has begun in the Eastern District of Texas that is regarding a small number of patents related to optical transport networks. The other Texas lawsuit is related to wireless patents and is set for an October trial.

RELATED:

• Huawei HiSilicon signs chip supply chain deal with a Chinese firm
• Huawei Band 6 Indian pricing revealed on Amazon prior to launch
• Huawei unveils a slew of new flagship products for the Asia-Pacific market
• Upcoming smartphones in July 2021: OnePlus, Huawei, Poco, Samsung, & more

The post Huawei files lawsuit against Verizon in the US over patent infringement appeared first on Gizmochina.

Apple has just been hit with another lawsuit earlier this week. XR Communications filed a lawsuit against the company alleging that a number of its products infringed on its MIMO wireless technology patent.

The firm filed a complaint with the US District Court for the Western District of Texas (Via AppleInsider) against the Cupertino based giant for infringing on a single patent granted in 2020. In the lawsuit, a number of products were mentioned, including the iPhone 6s and higher, every iPad model from the first generation, iPad Air and iPad mini 2, all Mac models launched since 2016, and the Apple TV 4K. XR Communication cited the infringement of US Patent No. 10,715,235 for ‘Directed wireless communication.’

While the technology cited in the lawsuit is specific, the system described in the complaint is used by a large number of manufacturers in the market that offer devices with Wi-Fi capabilities. The patent in question was developed by now defunct WiFi infrastructure specialist Vivato Technologies, which was founded back in 2000. While the iPhone maker already owns a number of patents related to MIMO communications and related technologies, XR Communications lawsuit, filing as Vivato, is seeking damages for past and ongoing royalty, court fees, and injunctive relief in its case.

RELATED:

• Apple iPhone crosses 100 million yuan in sales within a second on JD.com
• Apple Watch Series 7 tipped to feature blood glucose and body temperature sensors
• Beats Studio Buds launched with fewer Apple features but better Android support for $150
• United Kingdom starts investigation of Apple and Google’s duopoly in mobile ecosystem
• Apple iPhone crosses 100 million yuan in sales within a second on JD.com

The post Apple iPhone 6S and later models infringed on MIMO wireless tech patent: Lawsuit appeared first on Gizmochina.

Apple and Qualcomm are facing a lawsuit as both companies are accused of patent infringement. The lawsuit targets certain 5G technologies that are used by both companies, which infringes on an RF calibration patent.

According to an AppleInsider report, lawsuit was filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Texas last week. It alleges that a handful of the chip makers 5G wireless transceivers infringe on its patent. Similarly, it further adds that the iPhone 12 series from the Cupertino based giant uses these infringing transceiver technology, as the lineup incorporates Qualcomm’s 5G modems.

To be specific, the lawsuit targets Qualcomm’s SMR526, SDR865, and SDX55M as the infringing products. The party suing both tech giants is Red Rock, who owns these patents. The lawsuit also alleges that both Apple and Qualcomm had prior knowledge of the existing patent, and the lawsuit alleged that Qualcomm had received notices of the existence of the patent at least three times between the years 2008 and 2011.

Furthermore, the lawsuit states that the actions taken by the iPhone maker and Qualcomm “have been, and continue to be, committed in a knowing willful, and egregious manner and constitute willful infringement of” the intellectual property. At the moment, the complaint seeks a jury trial and a long list of prayers for relief, including enjoinments barring Apple and Qualcomm from infringing on the patent, along with royalty payment and even cover for damages as well.

RELATED:

• Apple iPhone 12 tops the chart in global Top 10 best selling smartphones list for January 2021
• Apple iPhone SE 2022 to feature 4.7 inch LCD panel, 2023 model to sport 6.1 inch punch hole display: Leak
• TSMC secures 5nm & 6nm orders from Qualcomm, new chips to launch in H2 2021: Tipster

The post Apple and Qualcomm face lawsuit over patent infringement on 5G chips appeared first on Gizmochina.

Earlier this week, Samsung Display filed another lawsuit against JOLED, a Japanese display maker, in the US. The former has alleged that the latter has violated and infringed upon its patented technology.

According to TheElec report, the US subsidiary of Samsung Display, Intellectual Keystone Technology (IKT) has filed a second lawsuit against JOLED and Asus in the US District Court for the Western District of Texas. For those unaware, IKT was founded by the South Korean display maker back in 2013 and provides patents related to organic light emitting diode (OLED) panels, lamps, encapsulations, and more, including for liquid crystal display (LCD) panels as well.

Editor’s Pick: Microsoft is working on a laptop display that can automatically adjust its viewing angle to meet the users’ gaze

As per the lawsuit, IKT claimed that the OLED panels manufactured by JOLED and supplied to Asus violated three of its patents. These patents were related to electronic device and manufacturing method for the wiring board and electrical optical devices, emission device, and another one within the emission device category. Previously, Samsung Display had filed a lawsuit back on January 8 in the same court, regarding violation of patents regarding its TFT array board and OLED devices.

Notably, the lawsuits also arrive as retaliation towards JOLED’s patent lawsuits that against Samsung Electronics and Samsung Display. Back then, JOLED claimed that Samsung Display had violated six of its patents that were used in over 40 smartphone models, including the Galaxy S5, Galaxy Note 4, Galaxy Fold, Galaxy Z Flip, and many more.

UP NEXT: Apple shifts some production from iPhone 12 mini to iPhone 12 Pro to meet high demand: Report

The post Samsung Display files two lawsuits against JOLED over patent infringement appeared first on Gizmochina.

Apple is facing another lawsuit. This time, the company is being sued over infringement of wireless communications patents through its iPhones and other products that feature cellular connectivity.

According to an Apple Insider report, the complaint was filed with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas earlier this week. The lawsuit alleges that the Cupertino based giant knowingly infringed on five pieces of intellectual property owned by Delaware-based Neo Wireless, LLC. The patents were for some of the underlying systems that are related to wireless communications, the frequency bands, and other mobile networking technologies.

Editor’s Pick: Anker Soundcore Liberty Air 2 Pro launched with ANC, 26 hour battery life, and wireless charging

The lawsuit is technically targetting the way that the iPhones use multiple cellular networks. This includes both 4G LTE and 5G networkings. The complaint states that “To utilize LTE or 4G and NR or 5G networks, the iPhone is manufactured to comply with wireless standards, such as the 3GPP standards, that ensure compatibility of wireless devices and wireless networks.”

While it is not specifically mentioned, the lawsuit is also targetting the Apple Watch and iPad, as these products are presumed to fall under the claims of the infringement as the company’s other cellular enabled gadgets. At the moment, the complaint is asking for a jury trial and demands that the company pay for the damages, cost and other expenses related to the infringement of the patents. This also includes paying their attorney fees and ongoing royalties as well.

UP NEXT: OPPO Reno5 Pro 5G pre order poster, pricing, and specifications leaked for India

The post Apple sued over infringement of wireless communications patents appeared first on Gizmochina.

Philips has moved the Delhi High Court to prevent Xiaomi, and its other related businesses in India, from manufacturing and selling certain smartphones that infringe on its patented technology.

For those unaware, the Chinese tech giant has allegedly infringed on technology patents that were owned by Philips, the known consumer electronics maker, who is now seeking to restrain the former from manufacturing, assembling, importing, selling, offering for sale, advertising and selling on third party websites that include any UMTS enhancement (HSPA, HSPA+) and LTE technologies, which infringe on Philips’ patents, as per a LiveMint report.

Editor’s Pick: Xiaomi M2007J17I listed as Mi 10i; Is it rebadged Mi 10T Lite or Redmi Note9 Pro 5G for India?

At the moment, the court has directed Xiaomi and other defendants to maintain their bank accounts operated in India, with a balance of 1,000 crores (roughly 136 million US Dollars). According to the court order passed on 27th November 2020, “It is made clear that the defendants are bound by the statement given by their counsel. The defendants shall file the details of the bank accounts operated in India where the amount of ₹1,000 crore is being maintained, on or before 2 December 2020.”

The next date of hearing for the matter is on 18th January 2021. Philips also sought an ad-interim order of injunction be granted directing the Central Board of Excise and Customs to issue instructions to custom authorities at every port in India. In other words, the company is seeking to stop the import of Xiaomi smartphones, especially those that infringe on its patented technology.

UP NEXT: A 60 foot “Gundam” robot is unveiled in Japan to help invigorate tourism hit by COVID-19

The post Philips moves HC in India to stop Xiaomi from selling phones that infringe on its patent appeared first on Gizmochina.

On Wednesday (26th August 2020), the UK Supreme Court unanimously dismissed appeals from Chinese tech giants, Huawei and ZTE. The appeals were regarding patent disputes over mobile data technology with Unwired Planet International and Conversant Wireless.

For those unaware, Unwired filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Huawei for 5 UK patents, that Unwired had acquired from Ericsson and were essential in mobile telecommunications. Previously, the English court found two of the patents valid and essential, and now, the following trial found that Unwired’s license terms were valid and were enforceable.

Editor’s Pick: Redmi 9 with 6.53-inch display, Helio G35, 13MP dual cameras, 5,000mAh battery launched for Rs. 8,999 (~$121)

Similarly, the second appeal was brought to court by Conversant against Huawei and ZTE. Allegedly, both Chinese vendors had infringed on four of its UK patents. These were acquired from Nokia and were related to LTE standards used in 4G smartphones for downloading and sending data. At the moment, Huawei and ZTE have argued that the UK courts did not have jurisdiction to determine the validity of foreign patents.

However, the trial judge has ruled against the two companies, stating that the court had jurisdiction under an international patent framework agreed by the mobile industry. Thus, both appeals were unanimously dismissed earlier this week by the Supreme Court. The move is said to “help level the playing field when small companies are trying to license SEP portfolios to global giants with seemingly limitless litigation resources.”

UP NEXT: Entire specs of realme 7 Pro leak: Snapdragon 720G, AMOLED display, 64MP Sony IMX682 & more

The post Huawei and ZTE patent appeals dismissed by UK Supreme Court appeared first on Gizmochina.

Earlier this week, the United States International Trade Commission announced that it is launching an investigation regarding an alleged infringement of Maxwell patents by Apple products. Despite hitting a 2 trillion US Dollar in market value, the company is still facing various lawsuits and allegations.

For those unaware, Maxwell is a Japanese company that makes consumer electronics products. It had filed a lawsuit against the Cupertino based giant earlier this year and even filed a complaint with the ITC. Maxwell sought for ITC to issue an exclusion order along with a cease and desist order as well. This would essentially prohibit Apple from importing devices that carry infringed technology into the US.

Editor’s Pick: OnePlus TV U1 55-inch Review: Beautiful Design, Vibrant 4K Screen makes it an Excellent Buy under ₹50,000

The ITC has since responded to the complaint and announced that it will be starting an investigation to find out if Apple products do infringe on the Japanese company’s patents and intellectual properties. According to a notice published by the ITC, ” “mobile devices, tablets, smartwatches, and laptop computers sold under the Apple brand name” will also fall under the investigation, which will test over 10 separate patent infringement claims from Maxwell.

UP NEXT: Apple and Google may face trouble as startups seek probe on their in-app purchase system

The post Apple is being investigated by USITC over patent dispute appeared first on Gizmochina.

Xiaomi is facing another patent infringement lawsuit. This time in Germany as HEVC Advance Licensors brings the Chinese tech giant to Düsseldorf Regional Court. The company was recently sued in India after InterDigital alleged it had infringed on three of its H.265/HEVC Indian patents.

HEVC advanced announced earlier this week that patent owners in HEVC Advance HEVC/H.265 Patent Pool has filed patent infringement lawsuits in the Düsseldorf Regional Court against Xiaomi and Vestel Germany, a known European consumer electronics manufacturer. They have accused Xiaomi of infringing on HEVC/H.265 digital video coding standard.

Editor’s Pick: Dell XPS 17 launched in India, features 10th Gen Intel Core i7 and Bezel less Display

According to the Cision report, the complaints have alleged that Vestel sells television and set top boxes in Germany which use HEVC/H.265 technology, while Xiaomi offers smartphone products with the same standards as well. It remains to be seen what stance the Chinese smartphone manufacturer takes regarding this accusation. Notably, HEVC Advance also announced that it recently settled another similar dispute in Düsseldorf Regional Court with a different firm. So, we will have to wait and see how the situation develops.

UP NEXT: Oppo Power Bank 2 launched in India, features 10,000mAh battery pack and fast charging

The post Xiaomi faces Patent Infringement charges in Germany by HEVC Advance Licensors appeared first on Gizmochina.

Nokia seeks to block the US imports for Lenovo computers after it allegedly found that the latter had infringed on multiple patents. the USITC (International Trade Commission) has launched an investigation into the matter, which will have Lenovo’s laptops, tablets, and even desktops being blocked from being imported.

According to fresh reports (1,2), Nokia has alleged that Lenovo has violated section 337 of the Tariff Act and has claimed that the latter’s IdeaPad, ThinkPad, and Flex series of laptops have infringed on five patents around the H.264 video compression standard. Thus, Nokia is looking to block the imports of Lenovo computers to the US. Within the next 45 days, the ITC will set a target date for completing its investigation regarding the accusation.

Editor’s Pick: [Update] Xiaomi Mi 10 Extreme Commemorative Edition to debut on August 11, 55W wireless charging expected

Notably, the complaint arrives a year after multiple “unsuccessful attempts to license Lenovo to the standard essential claims of Nokias H.264 portfolio,” according to the official filing. The infringement is said to be across multiple different platforms including tablets and desktops, although, the investigation is still in its early stages and we will have to wait for official results of the ITC investigation. So stay tuned.

UP NEXT: Apple launches new 27-inch iMac powered by Intel 10th generation processors

The post Nokia aims to block US imports of Lenovo computers, ITC to investigate patent infringement allegations appeared first on Gizmochina.

InterDigital, a US-based mobile and video Research & Development company, has sued China-based Xiaomi in the Indian market for allegedly copying its patented technology. The company has not filed one but two patent infringement actions against Xiaomi.

One complaint involves infringement of five of InterDigital’s cellular 3G and 4G Indian patents and the other complaint involves infringement of three of InterDigital’s H.265/HEVC Indian patents.

It appears that the legal action is being taken after years of negotiations. With the case filed in the Delhi High Court, the company is seeking compensatory and punitive damages for alleged infringement of its Indian patents.

The firm has also sought injunctive relief from the court to prevent further infringement of its patents unless Xiaomi decides to take a license on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms set by the court.

EDITOR’S PICK: India smartphone market declined by 48% in Q2 2020, Realme slipped to the fifth position

In a statement, InterDigital CEO William J. Merritt said: “Wireless and video standards play the important role of eliminating barriers to entry, enabling new companies – like Xiaomi – to enter the market and have success despite having made no investment in previous wireless research activities.”

Xiaomi is currently the largest smartphone brand in the Indian market and has captured around 29 percent of the market share. It is followed by Samsung, which regained the second position in India with 26 percent market share, inching close to take the pole position in the Indian smartphone market.

UP NEXT: Juho Sarvikas now VP of HMD Global North America; Nokia 8.3 5G to get U.S. launch this autumn

The post Xiaomi gets sued by InterDigital in India for alleged patent infringement appeared first on Gizmochina.

Koss, the known headphones maker, is suing Apple for a number of patent infringements regarding its wireless headphones technology. The former has accused the Cupertino based giant on infringing on 5 of its patents, regarding wireless headphones and their operation.

According to a report from PatentlyApple, Koss has met up with Apple four times to discuss the allegations. Although, the latter has yet to admit to the infringement. The lawsuit against Apple might not be the only one, as Koss hinted at other possible firms that have infringed on its technology as well. The lawsuit reads “Apple and others are reaping enormous benefits due to John C. Koss’s vision, and Koss Corporation’s commitment to that vision, for more than six decades.”

Editor’s Pick: OnePlus Nord vs Realme X50 5G vs OPPO Find X2 Lite: Specs Comparison

Koss is suing Apple mainly around its Striva range of headphones. Apparently, the “whole listening ecosystems having been built around the techniques Koss conceived of over a decade ago.” Meaning, Apple saw great success in the hearables market at the expense of Koss and its technology. The company said that “Apple is liable to Koss in an amount that compensates it for such infringement, which by law cannot be less than a reasonable royalty.”

Koss met up with the smartphone giant four times over the course of over two and a half years period, including multiple email exchanges. The hearables brand also “provided Apple with claim charts identifying how Apple infringed certain of Koss’s patents, including each of the Patents-in-Suit.” Unfortunately, Apple has yet to make a public statement regarding the matter. So stay tuned for more updates.

UP NEXT: TSMC witnesses record-breaking rise; briefly becomes the world’s 10th most valuable company

The post Apple is being sued by Koss for infringing on wireless headphone technology appeared first on Gizmochina.

With the US cracking down hard on Huawei and pressurizing the company on multiple fronts, it seems that the smartphone vendor has started to fight back and is targetting multiple brands like HP, Verizon, and even Cisco with patent infringement.

A few recent changes in the US Government’s FRAND agreements (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) have enabled Huawei to sue the aforementioned companies. In other words, the amendments have made it easier for Huawei to target these companies. The Chinese tech giant’s response to the US sanctions against starts from patent infringement claims Verizon for its own technology and products that it had acquired from Cisco and Hewlett-Packard.

Editor’s Pick: World’s First 120W fast charging unveiled by iQOO; First 120W iQOO phone could be coming in August

At the moment, Huawei is demanding royalty payments for hundreds of patents. Notably, sources claimed that this event might also be leveraged by the Chinese company to compel court discovery on Verizon’s and its suppliers’ confidential information. In simplers terms, Huawei would be able to gain in-depth access to its competitor’s products and technology.

The turn of events was unexpected, to say the least, as the US Government, in particular, did not consider that Huwaei would turn the US patent law against American companies. Additionally, this could also lead to further harm to local companies in the near future as well. So stay tuned as we will be providing more updates on the matter.

UP NEXT: New US regulation banning Huawei and others could affect over 800 Japanese companies

(Via:1,2)

The post Huawei begins counterattack, files patent infringement against Verizon, HP and Cisco appeared first on Gizmochina.

Huawei, the known smartphone maker, is being sued by Cedar Lane Technologies. The latter had filed a lawsuit earlier this week for patent infringement and claims that Huawei infringed on their image processing patents and even used these patented methods in their systems and devices.

According to Cedar Lane Technologies, the Chinese tech giant has infringed on multiple different patents including JPEG compression, scene recognition, electro-luminescent devices, image processing systems, VR camera, and more. Cedar Lane alleged that the smartphone maker has infringed one particular patent on a variety of its products such as smartphones like the Mate Xs, Mate X, Mate 20, Mate 20 Pro, Honor View 10, Honor 8 and even tablets like the MediaPad M5, MediaPad M6, and MediaPad T5.”

Editor’s Pick: Huawei TNN-AN00 phone’s specifications leaked; Could it be Huawei Enjoy 20s?

Cedar Lane said that these products have been “made, used, sold, imported, and offered for sale by Defendant.” The infringement from Huawei revolves around one particular patent, namely 527 patent, which covers “[a] method for interfacing analog/digital converting means and JPEG compression means, said JPEG compression means having a built-in memory device, comprising the steps of: sequentially reading a predetermined number of image lines from the image data output of said analog/digital converting means.”

The plaintiff claimed that since Huawei utilized this image conversion method, it infringes on its patents. Cedar Lane has also stated that it had “employees internally test and use these Exemplary Products.” In other words, Huawei had knowledge about the patent but still created products, which was grounds for this infringement suit.

UP NEXT: Xiaomi crowdfunds 8H Smart Mattress in China for a starting price of 4,599 yuan ($657)

(Via)

The post Huawei is facing a lawsuit regarding Image Processing patents appeared first on Gizmochina.

Sharp Corporation has recently filed a damage lawsuit for patent infringement against a major smartphone manufacturer. The company is suing Oppo, the Chinese tech giant, in the Taiwan Intellectual Property Court.

For those unaware, Sharp Corporation is a Japanese multinational brand that designs and manufactures electronic products. The company recently filed a lawsuit against Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd on 1st April 2020. According to the lawsuit, Sharp has alleged that Oppo smartphones that are sold in Taiwan infringe on one of its LTE patents.

Editor’s Pick: OnePlus releases OxygenOS Open Beta 6 for OnePlus 6 / 6T with March 2020 security patch and more

In other words, this is related to the communications technologies that are implemented in smartphones. Sharp considers its intellectual property as a major resource for its business development, so this violation is being dealt with immediately.

As of right now, Sharp Corporation’s wireless communications standard patent portfolio includes more than 6,000 patents across 50 countries. And seeing its actions, it is clear that they will take necessary actions to protect their intellectual property. This is still in early stages so any developments regarding this case should arrive soon after. So stay tuned as updates will be provided when available.

UP NEXT: Xiaomi rolls out PatchWall 3.0 update to all the Mi TVs running Android TV in India

(Source,Via)

The post Oppo sued by Sharp for Patent Infringement Damages in Taiwan appeared first on Gizmochina.

Huawei is officially joining the OIN (Open Invention Network), the largest patent production group which will arrive as a shock to many. On the one side, the Chinese tech giant has been accused of stealing trade secrets from the US, while at the same time the company made $6 billion in patent royalties since 2001 from US based companies alone.

For those unaware, OIN is a major patent non-aggression community. Its mission is to enable Linux, its related software and programmers to develop and monetize the Linux and open source software. The primary focus of this being able to monitize without having face issues regarding patent infringement and lawsuits. This is done by practicing patent non-aggression in core Linux and its open source technology. In simpler terms, companies in the group cross license the Linux System to one another without the need for a royalty fee.

Now, with Huawei joining the group, the impacts could be huge. This is due to the Chinese brand holding a massive portfolio of IP Information and communications technology (ICT) patents. According to OIN CEO, Keith Bergelt, he “appreciates Huawei joining OIN and supporting patent non-aggression in the core of Linux and adjacent open-source software.”

Editor’s Pick: The Mi Fan Festival 2020 Sale Featuring Great Discounts, Big Coupons and Unmissable Deals Kicks Off on Gearbest

A little known fact about Huawei which is generally unknown is that the company is one of the top contributors to the Linux Kernel. It is also a Platinum member of the Linux Foundation through its other key open source projects. This move is being appreciated since it portrays Huawei’s strong support for open source and open collaboration. Meaning, shared patents, and technology that benefits all.

Huawei’s Head of Global Intellectual Property, Jianxin Ding, stated that “Huawei is committed to offering the highest quality ICT and smart devices.” He mentioned that supporting the non-aggression patent in Linux will showcase the company’s commitment to innovation. Furthermore, Jianxin also said that the company is always open to working with both US based and non-US based firms.

UP NEXT: Apple patents reveal an iPhone that can used underwater, another shows automatic screen adjustment

(Via)

The post Huawei joins the OIN, the largest open source patent protection group appeared first on Gizmochina.

Apple and Broadcom have been ordered by a jury to pay $1.1 billion to the California Institute of Technology for infringing the university’s patents. The jury has ruled that Apple must pay Caltech $837.8 million and Broadcom must pay $270.2 million.

However, Apple said that it is planning to appeal the ruling but has refused to say anything else about this. In a statement, Broadcom said that “we disagree with the factual and legal bases for the verdict and intend to appeal.”

In a statement, CalTech said: “We are pleased the jury found that Apple and Broadcom infringed Caltech patents. As a non-profit institution of higher education, Caltech is committed to protecting its intellectual property in furtherance of its mission to expand human knowledge and benefit society through research integrated with education.”

EDITOR’S PICK: Opinion: If Poco X2 turns out to be a rebranded Redmi K30, I’ll be disappointed

The case was filed in federal court in Los Angeles in 2016, in which the California-based research university alleged that Broadcom Wi-Fi chips used in hundreds of millions of Apple devices infringed patents relating to data transmission technology.

The technology relates to Wi-Fi chips Apple used in its iPhones, iPads, Macs and other devices from the year 2010 to 2017. Apple argued that it shouldn’t have been involved in the lawsuit — which was filed in 2016 — because it’s using off-the-shelf Broadcom chips, like many other handset makers.

Apple argued that “Broadcom manufactures the accused chips, while Apple is merely an indirect downstream party whose products incorporate the accused chips.” However, the jury disagreed with this argument.

Broadcom is a major Apple supplier, deriving about a fifth of its sales from the Cupertino-based company in its fiscal 2019. Last week, the company revealed that it had signed deals to sell as much as $15 billion worth of chips to Apple.

UP NEXT: Apple made nearly $1 billion a day in revenue in the last fiscal quarter

The post CalTech wins $1.1 billion patent infringement case against Apple and Broadcom appeared first on Gizmochina.

Remember the story of Coolpad’s lawsuit against Xiaomi for patent infringement? We all thought the case was dead since Coolpad’s CEO hinted that it was just to draw awareness to respecting intellectual property.  Apparently, it isn’t dead as Coolpad through its subsidiary Yulong Computer Technology has reportedly filed a case before a Shenzhen court. The company released a publication announcing its lawsuit, making bare some details about it.

The publication highlighted that Coolpad discovered the unspecified violations and informed Xiaomi back in January and we brought you that report. It also claimed that Xiaomi was observed to have continued producing smartphones that violated its intellectual property. As a result, the company is formally applying to have the case heard by a court in Shenzhen.

The company is demanding a ban on the specific Xiaomi phones which infringes on the said patent. Now, the phones that could get banned include the Mi Mix, Redmi Note 4X, Mi 6, Mi Max 2, Mi Note 3, Redmi Note 5, Redmi 5 Plus and Mi 5X.  Coolpad is also seeking compensation from Xiaomi for economic losses. If you care to know, the disputed patent is called “Method for Implementing Call Record Interface System of Multi-Mode Mobile Communication Terminal” with patent number ZL200610034036.7.

Read also: Coolpad CEO Claims Xiaomi Violated Over 200 of Its Patents & Lawsuit Is To Create Awareness

Reports indicate that Xiaomi is yet to receive the court papers. However, it is interesting to note the closeness of this suit to Xiaomi’s planned IPO which could see the company raise as much as $10 billion. It is likely that the case will be settled out of court in other to forestall any negative publicity it might elicit.

(source)

The post Coolpad Wants Eight Xiaomi Phones, Including Mi Mix 2 Banned For Patent Infringement appeared first on Gizmochina.

We recently brought you a report that Coolpad had filed a patent infringement lawsuit against three companies of which Xiaomi was one of them. The lawsuit was filed at the Guangdong Province Intermediate People’s Court but a date is yet to be slated for hearing on the matter. Xiaomi has now issued an official response to the alleged patent infringement. 

Xiaomi responded to a request for comment by Sina science and technology and in the response, the tech giant claimed that it is yet to be served the court papers as they had also seen it on the internet. The tech giant also stated that the details of the patent infringement are not clear. Also, Xiaomi also disclosed that it holds several patent agreements with Microsoft, Nokia, and other patent holders. In addition to that, the company hinted that it is also increasing its Research & Development effort with investments in that regard. Xiaomi recently opened a new R&D center in Shenzhen, Mainland China.

Read Also: Coolpad Takes Xiaomi To Court Over Patent Infringement

In the said lawsuit filed by Yulong Computer Communications Technology (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd, a subsidiary of the Coolpad Group, Yulong claims Xiaomi and other co-accused produced, promised to sell and sold products that infringed on three of its patents with patent numbers; ZL200610034034.3, ZL201210250264.8, and ZL201210064396.7. The three patents are said to relate to app icon management, notifications, and system UI. As expected, the company seeks to stop the sales of the products infringing on its patents and also seeks compensation for the losses it suffered.

(source)

The post Xiaomi Responds To Coolpad’s Patent Infringement Case: No Official Notice Received appeared first on Gizmochina.

Following a High Court of England ruling against Huawei a few days ago, the table has turned for the phone manufacturer. A Chinese court has awarded Huawei Technologies a sum of $11.60 million (¥80 million) to be paid by Samsung.

According to a report by Quanzhou Evening News, the fine is the result of a ruling in a patent infringement case filed by Huawei against Samsung over a smartphone patent held by the former’s mobile division (Huawei Device Co. Ltd). The law suit was filed in May and is just one of several in China and the US. It is reported that Samsung also countersued Huawei in China for patent infringement.

The suit was filed against Samsung China Investment Co. Limited and two other units in Huzhou and Tianjin. It also includes two electronic companies involved in the manufacturing of more than a score of Samsung devices said to infringe on the patent. One of the devices is the Galaxy S7 released in 2016.

READ MORE: New Huawei Phone Shows Upon TENAA With HD Display, 4GB RAM and Nougat

A Huawei spokesman said the court’s decision is welcomed while Samsung says it will respond after reviewing the ruling. The court has ordered all five firms involved to stop the infringement. However, only the three Samsung firms will pay the fine.

Huawei itself risks a ban in the UK if it doesn’t pay Unwired Planet International royalties for the 4G patents it uses in its devices.

(Source)

The post Samsung Ordered to Pay Huawei $11.6 Million By Chinese Court Over Patent Case appeared first on Gizmochina.

AMD says all four companies used visual processing infringing on its concepts for unified graphic shaders and parallel graphics pipelines. If AMD’s allegations turn out to be true, we could see a product ban placed on items manufactured by the affected companies. USITC says that the list of respondents includes LG Electronics USA, LG Electronics Korea, and LG Electronics MobileComm USA; Mediatek Inc. Taiwan, Mediatek USA; and Sigma Designs Inc. CA.

READ MORE: Rumor: Major manufacturers Giving Up on Helio X30, May Spell Doom for Mediatek

An official statement by USITC says “The USITC will make a final determination in the investigation at the earliest practicable time. Within 45 days after institution of the investigation, the USITC will set a target date for completing the investigation. USITC remedial orders in section 337 cases are effective when issued and become final 60 days after issuance unless disapproved for policy reasons by the U.S. Trade Representative within that 60-day period”.

(Source)

The post US International Trade Commission Investigates Mediatek in AMD Patent Infringement Allegation appeared first on Gizmochina.

New returnee, Nokia is already making waves in the smartphone sector but its not what you think. We are yet to see the expected Nokia Android-powered smartphone but the company is in the news because it recently filed multiple lawsuits against Apple. According to reports, Nokia and Alcatel-Lucent have jointly instituted a major legal battle with rival company, Apple. This has seen the company filing lawsuits in Germany and the US on grounds of infringement of 32 of their patents by Apple.

A statement issued by Nokia reveals the patents include several technologies ranging from display, user interface, software, antenna, chipsets, to video coding. The lawsuits filed in the US were done in a federal court in East Texas which has a long history of favoring patent owners. No details on the lawsuit filed in Germany was given. But the The US lawsuit , on the other hand, includes 10 patents with most of them originating from Nokia, while at least one originated from Lucent Technologies. Make no mistake, Alcatel-Lucent was acquired by Nokia last year.

This isn’t the first time Nokia and Apple are getting into legal battle with each other as both companies had fought major legal battles between 2009 and 2011. The lawsuits back then spanned the globe but were seeming settled in 2011 with both parties reaching a settlement in 2011 that saw Nokia raking in hundreds of millons of Euros. Both parties are back in the trenches, though, as Nokia said in a statement today that Apple refused to license “other of its patented inventions which are used by many of Apple’s products.” Perhaps those patented inventions were not offered as part of the 2011 agreement.

Read Also: HMD Global Oy Officially Unveiled As the New Home of Nokia-Branded Phones

The Nokia lawsuit lists infringement by virtually every version of iPhone, including the latest iPhone 7 down to iPhone 3GS. The iPad Pro and every version of iPad Air and iPad Mini, as well as the Apple Watch, Apple TV, and services like Find My iPhone and Find my iPad were also listed to have infringed on Nokia’s patent rights. Even the acclaimed Apple Siri featured in iOS 10 is said to have infringed on a patent it acquired from Alcatel-Lucent.

On its own part, Apple has also filed an antitrust lawsuit against Nokia in a federal court in San Jose, accusing the Finnish company of distributing its patent to so-called “patent trolls”, better known as patent assertion companies (PAE). The massive patent distribution to PAE is in order “to maximize the aggregate royalties that can be extracted from product companies,” Apple lawyers allege. One of the alleged PAE is Acacia Research Corp., which won a $22.1 million verdict against Apple in June.

Read More: Nokia Z2 Plus with 4GB RAM Spotted on Geekbench

This is not doubt going to be a long legal battle between both companies but note that it isn’t going to affect the release of the much expected Nokia Android phone which would herald the return of the Nokia brand into the smartphone market. Nokia has already sold its mobile phone business to Finnish company HMD Global Oy and all is going on as planned.

source

The post Nokia Sues Apple Big Time! appeared first on Gizmochina.

While it is being sued by Qualcomm for patent infringement, Meizu seems to be trying to get its own pound of flesh unfortunately not from Qualcomm. The Chinese company has accused fellow Chinese rivals OPPO, Xiaomi and Smartisan of infringing on its mBack patent.

If you don’t know, Meizu mBack was coined from the word “I’m Back” and refers to the specialized home button that eliminated the for a separate back button on the phone, all integrated into the home button. The Meizu mBack offers four operations which users can implement for faster and more comfortable use of their Meizu smartphone. The mBack button functions as a fingerprint scanner to unlock the phone, also unlocks apps and takes you back to previous page when tapped. In addition, it takes you to the home page from any page on the pone and when pressed for long, it locks the phone.

Meizu patented this design sometime back in China and has since being using it on successive Meizu smartphones. However, the company is accusing fellow Chinese phonemaker Smartisan of using its patented design without consent. Smartisan just released its Smartisan M1 and M1L smartphones in China and just like the iPhone 7, the phone has a round home button but in function the home key is similar to Meizu mBack.

Read More: Meizu Also Developing a Foldable Display, Patent Filing Reveals

Meizu VP has come all out via a couple of Weibo posts to claim this is an infringement of its mBack patent and even went as far as accusing Xiaomi, OPPO and a few others of infringing on its patent. Perhaps we’ll be seeing a couple of law suits very soon and would keep an eye on this. The companies mentioned are yet to respond.

The post Meizu Accuses Xiaomi, OPPO & Smartisan of mBack Patent Infringement appeared first on Gizmochina.