<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Penalty Archives - Gizmochina</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/penalty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/penalty/</link>
	<description>Latest Tech News, Product Reviews and Deals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:51:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Samsung to pay $9.8 million for misleading its smartphone customers</title>
		<link>https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/07/29/samsung-pay-9-million-misleading-phone-customers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Australia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gizmochina.com/?p=473038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="192" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-300x192.jpg?x44794" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-300x192.jpg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-768x490.jpg 768w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-1024x654.jpg 1024w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-696x444.jpg 696w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-1068x682.jpg 1068w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-658x420.jpg 658w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-1920x1226.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p>Samsung Electronics has been facing charges in Australia for apparently misleading its customers regarding one of its features on its Galaxy smartphones. And now, the company will be required to pay millions of US Dollars. For those unaware, the Australian Federal Court Justice Brendan Murphy had ordered the South Korean tech giant to 14 million [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/07/29/samsung-pay-9-million-misleading-phone-customers/">Samsung to pay $9.8 million for misleading its smartphone customers</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="192" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-300x192.jpg?x44794" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-300x192.jpg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-768x490.jpg 768w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-1024x654.jpg 1024w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-696x444.jpg 696w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-1068x682.jpg 1068w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-658x420.jpg 658w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-1920x1226.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/samsung/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Samsung Electronics</a> has been facing charges in Australia for apparently misleading its customers regarding one of its features on its Galaxy smartphones. And now, the company will be required to pay millions of US Dollars.</p>
<figure id="attachment_367636" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-367636" style="width: 3264px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" class="wp-image-367636 size-full" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured.jpg?x44794" alt="Samsung" width="3264" height="2084" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured.jpg 3264w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-300x192.jpg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-768x490.jpg 768w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-1024x654.jpg 1024w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-696x444.jpg 696w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-1068x682.jpg 1068w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-658x420.jpg 658w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Galaxy-S8-Plus-Featured-1920x1226.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 3264px) 100vw, 3264px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-367636" class="wp-caption-text">Galaxy S8+</figcaption></figure>
<p>For those unaware, the Australian Federal Court Justice Brendan Murphy had ordered the South Korean tech giant to 14 million Australian Dollars (roughly 9.8 million US Dollars) within 30 days. Furthermore, the brand will have to pay an additional 140,000 US Dollars for the cost faced by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, which had began the investigation four years ago. The company faced the fine for misleading its smartphone customers regarding the water resistance claims for its Galaxy handsets.</p>
<p>These false claims were made regarding water resistance on seven Galaxy phones that were aired in 9 advertisements between the years 2016 and 2018. The models in these ads includes the Galaxy S7, Galaxy S7 Edge, Galaxy A5 (2017), Galaxy A7 (2017), Galaxy S8, Galaxy S8 Plus, and Galaxy Note 8. As of right now, the smartphone maker  is not disputing these charges and has also agreed to pay the penalty amount as well.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" class="aligncenter wp-image-152954 size-full" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/samsung-logo.jpg?x44794" alt="Samsung" width="594" height="396" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/samsung-logo.jpg 594w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/samsung-logo-300x200.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 594px) 100vw, 594px" /></p>
<p>The reason for the fines are due to Samsung showing its smartphones being using in swimming pools and seawater. However, these models were only water resistant not water proofed and would not have been able to withstand these conditions in real world situations. Furthermore, one scene even showed them charging after being wet, which in reality would&#8217;ve damaged the charging ports of these smartphones.</p>
<p><strong>RELATED:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/07/29/samsung-trademark-450mp-camera-sensor/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Samsung trademark filing indicates the company working on 450MP camera sensor</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/07/29/samsungs-q2-2022-sales-are-strong-however-profits-are-still-declining/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Samsung&#8217;s Q2 2022 sales are &#8220;strong&#8221;, however profits are still declining</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/07/28/samsung-galaxy-buds-2-pro-price-leaked/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro Price leaked, Could Launch in Galaxy Unpacked Event</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/07/26/google-pixel-7-pixel-7-pro-camera-configurations-tipped-will-come-with-samsungs-gn1-main-sensor/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google Pixel 7, Pixel 7 Pro camera configurations tipped, will come with Samsung&#8217;s GN1 main sensor</a></li>
</ul>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="King Smith WR1 Rowing Machine Review: The Most Compact Water Rower" width="696" height="392" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lJn9WAeZ360?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/07/29/samsung-pay-9-million-misleading-phone-customers/">Samsung to pay $9.8 million for misleading its smartphone customers</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google loses antitrust appeal in the EU; needs to pay $2.8 billion fine</title>
		<link>https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/11/11/google-antitrust-appeal-2-8-billion-fine/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 07:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gizmochina.com/?p=424443</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="203" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/google-logo-2-300x203.jpg?x44794" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Google Logo Featured" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/google-logo-2-300x203.jpg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/google-logo-2-622x420.jpg 622w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/google-logo-2.jpg 640w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p>The European Union&#8217;s General Court has ruled that the European Commission was right in fining Google for an antirust breach for which the technology giant was fined 2.42 billion euros, approximately $2.8 billion. A few years ago, in 2017, EU&#8217;s competition watchdog European Commission found that Google had favored its own comparison shopping services and fined the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/11/11/google-antitrust-appeal-2-8-billion-fine/">Google loses antitrust appeal in the EU; needs to pay $2.8 billion fine</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="203" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/google-logo-2-300x203.jpg?x44794" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Google Logo Featured" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/google-logo-2-300x203.jpg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/google-logo-2-622x420.jpg 622w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/google-logo-2.jpg 640w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p>The European Union&#8217;s General Court has ruled that the <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/european-commission">European Commission</a> was right in fining Google for an antirust breach for which the technology giant was fined 2.42 billion euros, approximately $2.8 billion.</p>
<p>A few years ago, in 2017, EU&#8217;s competition watchdog European Commission found that Google had favored its own comparison shopping services and fined the company for breaching antitrust rules. The search engine giant then contested the claims to the second-highest court in the <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/eu">EU</a> and has now lost the appeal.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-357482 aligncenter" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/google-logo-2.jpg?x44794" alt="Google Logo Featured" width="640" height="432" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/google-logo-2.jpg 640w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/google-logo-2-300x203.jpg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/google-logo-2-622x420.jpg 622w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></p>
<p>The court has confirmed that the company will need to pay the fine of 2.42 billion euros. The <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/alphabet">Alphabet</a>-owned company also has an option to appeal this verdict and take the case forward to the EU’s highest court.</p>
<p>In a press release, the court said:<em> &#8220;The General Court finds that, by favoring its own comparison shopping service on its general results pages through more favorable display and positioning, while relegating the results from competing comparison services in those pages by means of ranking algorithms, Google departed from competition on the merits.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>The company said it made changes in 2017 to comply with the commission’s decision. In a statement, the company said: <em>&#8220;Our approach has worked successfully for more than three years, generating billions of clicks for more than 700 comparison shopping services.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>After this <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/antitrust">anti-trust</a> fine in 2017, the commission followed by two other major antitrust penalties against Google, totaling 8.25 billion euros ($9.5 billion), which the company is appealing. The fines are a drop in the bucket for Google&#8217;s parent company which earned $182 billion in revenue just last year.</p>
<p><strong>RELATED: </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/11/11/google-pixelbook-2-not-launching-soon/">Google PixelBook 2 laptop is not getting launched anytime soon</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/11/11/google-pixel-6-face-unlock-support/">Google Pixel 6 series could get Face Unlock support in a future update</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/11/05/google-play-store-third-party-in-app-payments-south-korea/">Google to start allowing third-party in-app payments in South Korea</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/11/07/google-pixel-6-seems-to-have-an-overrated-fast-charging-capability-new-tests-reveal/">Google Pixel 6 seems to have an overrated fast charging capability, new tests reveal</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/11/04/pixel-3a-series-android-12l-compatible-pixel-3-to-get-last-update-in-2022/">Google Pixel 3a series compatible with Android 12L, Pixel 3/3 XL to get one last update in early 2022</a></li>
</ul>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="Hotwav Cyber 7 Review: Cyber Game Style Rugged Phone!" width="696" height="392" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Zi53NaN6DgM?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/11/11/google-antitrust-appeal-2-8-billion-fine/">Google loses antitrust appeal in the EU; needs to pay $2.8 billion fine</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook fined $70 million for deliberate breach during Giphy acquisition probe</title>
		<link>https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/10/22/facebook-giphy-acquisition-probe-fine-cma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 04:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Competition and Markets Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gizmochina.com/?p=420711</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-300x169.jpeg?x44794" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Facebook Logo" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-300x169.jpeg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-768x432.jpeg 768w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-1024x576.jpeg 1024w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-696x392.jpeg 696w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-1068x601.jpeg 1068w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-747x420.jpeg 747w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo.jpeg 1600w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p>Social media giant Facebook has been fined £50 million ($70 million USD) by the Competition and Markets Authority in the UK for purposely concealing information about its Giphy acquisition. The company&#8217;s dealings with Giphy were called out by the UK regulators, leading to CMA launching an antitrust probe. The Competition and Markets Authority had issued an [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/10/22/facebook-giphy-acquisition-probe-fine-cma/">Facebook fined $70 million for deliberate breach during Giphy acquisition probe</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-300x169.jpeg?x44794" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Facebook Logo" loading="lazy" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-300x169.jpeg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-768x432.jpeg 768w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-1024x576.jpeg 1024w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-696x392.jpeg 696w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-1068x601.jpeg 1068w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-747x420.jpeg 747w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo.jpeg 1600w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><p>Social media giant Facebook <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/cma-fines-facebook-over-enforcement-order-breach">has been fined</a> £50 million ($70 million USD) by the Competition and Markets Authority in the UK for purposely concealing information about its Giphy acquisition. The company&#8217;s dealings with Giphy were called out by the UK regulators, leading to CMA launching an antitrust probe.</p>
<p>The Competition and Markets Authority had issued an initial enforcement order to Facebook in June last year as it began its investigation into the <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/acquisition">acquisition</a> deal. The order was aimed to ensure that companies continue to compete as they would in the absence of a merger and it prevents them from integrating further.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" class="size-full wp-image-420242 aligncenter" src="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo.jpeg?x44794" alt="Facebook Logo" width="1600" height="900" srcset="https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo.jpeg 1600w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-300x169.jpeg 300w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-768x432.jpeg 768w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-1024x576.jpeg 1024w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-696x392.jpeg 696w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-1068x601.jpeg 1068w, https://www.gizmochina.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Facebook-Logo-747x420.jpeg 747w" sizes="(max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px" /></p>
<p>As a part of the order, <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/facebook">Facebook</a> is legally required to provide regular updates to show that it is complying with the order. But, CMA says that Facebook &#8220;significantly limited the scope of those updates&#8221; despite repeated warnings.</p>
<p>The regulator also noted that this is the first time a company has been found to have breached an IEO by &#8220;consciously refusing&#8221; to report all the required information. Further, it added that Facebook&#8217;s failure to comply was &#8220;deliberate&#8221; as the <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/social-media">social media</a> company was given multiple warnings.</p>
<p>Joel Bamford, senior director of mergers at the CMA, said: <em>&#8220;We warned Facebook that its refusal to provide us with important information was a breach of the order but, even after losing its appeal in two separate courts, Facebook continued to disregard its legal obligations. This should serve as a warning to any company that thinks it is above the law.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Separately, the CMA has fined Facebook £500,000 for changing its Chief Compliance Officer on two separate occasions without seeking consent first.</p>
<p>A couple of months ago, the CMA said it had provisionally found Facebook&#8217;s purchase of Giphy would harm competition between social media platforms and remove a potential challenger in the display advertising market. It also said that Facebook could be required to unwind the <a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/deal">deal</a>, which is reportedly worth $400 million, and sell off Giphy if its concerns are ultimately confirmed.</p>
<p><strong>RELATED: </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/10/20/facebook-rebrand-new-company-name-soon/">Facebook reportedly planning to rebrand the company with a new name next week</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/10/06/telegram-70-million-new-users-facebook-outage/">Telegram gained more than 70 million new users during the Facebook outage</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/09/21/facebook-announces-battery-powered-portal-go-redesigned-and-smaller-portal-plus-unveiled-too/">Facebook announces battery-powered Portal Go and a redesigned Portal Plus</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/08/09/tiktok-dethrones-facebook-to-emerge-as-the-worlds-most-downloaded-social-media-app/">TikTok dethrones Facebook to emerge as the world’s most downloaded social media app</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/09/09/facebook-and-ray-bans-smart-glasses-dubbed-rayban-stories-launched/">Facebook and Ray-Ban’s smart glasses dubbed Ray-Ban Stories launched</a></li>
</ul>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="HUAWEI Matebook 14s Laptop Review: A step forward in Productivity with Cross Device Collaboration" width="696" height="392" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ni05c0s619Q?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com/2021/10/22/facebook-giphy-acquisition-probe-fine-cma/">Facebook fined $70 million for deliberate breach during Giphy acquisition probe</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gizmochina.com">Gizmochina</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 55/81 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Content Delivery Network Full Site Delivery via cloudflare
Database Caching 6/29 queries in 0.011 seconds using Redis
Fragment Caching 2/3 fragments using Redis

Served from: www.gizmochina.com @ 2026-06-29 22:46:23 by W3 Total Cache
-->