iPhone 18 Pro and Galaxy S26 take very different approaches to the compact flagship formula. Apple focuses on the A20 Pro chip, advanced video features and a high-end camera system, while Samsung combines a sharp AMOLED display, versatile cameras, DeX and a lighter everyday design. The comparison matters because both target premium buyers but prioritize different strengths.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The iPhone 18 Pro uses Ceramic Shield 2 on the front with an aluminum frame and glass-based rear, plus IP68 protection rated for immersion up to 6 meters. The Galaxy S26 pairs Gorilla Glass Victus 2 with an aluminum frame and Armor Aluminum 2. Both feel suitably premium, but Apple’s materials and stronger water-resistance rating add extra reassurance.

Display Quality

Both phones feature 6.3-inch 120Hz LTPO-class OLED panels, delivering smooth scrolling and flagship-level contrast. Apple’s Super Retina XDR display adds Dolby Vision, HDR10 and up to 3000 nits peak brightness, while Samsung offers Dynamic AMOLED 2X, HDR10+ and 2600 nits peak brightness. The iPhone’s broader HDR format support gives it an edge for premium video consumption.

Verdict

Apple wins for display versatility and peak brightness, while Samsung remains highly competitive. The iPhone 18 Pro feels better suited to buyers prioritizing HDR video and outdoor visibility.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The iPhone 18 Pro runs Apple’s A20 Pro on a 2nm process with a six-core CPU and seven-core GPU, paired with 12GB RAM. Galaxy S26 uses Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 in selected markets or Exynos 2600 elsewhere, also with 12GB RAM. Apple’s tighter hardware-software integration makes the iPhone particularly compelling for demanding apps and sustained creative workloads.

Battery and Charging

The Galaxy S26 packs a 4300mAh battery with 25W wired and 15W wireless charging, while the iPhone 18 Pro uses a market-dependent 4056mAh or 4288mAh battery. Apple’s MagSafe and Qi2 charging reach 25W, with 50% claimed in 30 minutes. Samsung adds reverse wireless charging, making it more flexible for accessories.

Verdict

Apple takes the performance edge with its A20 Pro, while Samsung offers more charging flexibility. For raw flagship performance and creative workloads, the iPhone 18 Pro feels more compelling.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The iPhone 18 Pro combines a 48MP main camera with 48MP periscope telephoto offering 4x optical zoom and a 48MP ultrawide. Galaxy S26 uses a 50MP main camera, 10MP 3x telephoto and 12MP ultrawide. Samsung supports 8K recording, but Apple’s ProRes RAW, Apple Log 2, Dolby Vision and spatial video make its camera system particularly strong for creators.

Selfie Camera

Apple equips the iPhone 18 Pro with an 18MP multi-aspect ultrawide selfie camera featuring PDAF and advanced 3D sensing. Samsung uses a 12MP autofocus selfie camera with 4K recording and HDR10+ support. The iPhone offers greater flexibility for framing and advanced video workflows, while Samsung’s selfie setup remains well equipped for everyday photography and calls.

Verdict

Apple wins the camera comparison through its higher-resolution secondary sensors, 4x telephoto and extensive professional video tools. Samsung remains versatile, especially with 8K recording.

Pricing

The iPhone 18 Pro is priced around $1,200 / ₹164,900, while the Galaxy S26 is priced around $900 / ₹88,000. That creates a substantial gap, particularly in the Indian market. Both phones target premium buyers, but the Galaxy S26 reaches flagship territory at a considerably lower entry price.

Is the price justified? 

The iPhone’s premium is easier to justify for users who specifically need its A20 Pro performance, advanced camera hardware, ProRes RAW, Apple Log 2, and the MagSafe ecosystem. Galaxy S26 offers a broader mainstream feature set, including DeX, 12GB RAM, 120Hz AMOLED technology and wireless charging at a much lower price.

Verdict

Samsung offers stronger value for money, while Apple targets buyers willing to pay more for advanced performance, imaging and video capabilities. The Galaxy S26 is the more practical premium purchase.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The iPhone 18 Pro stands out with its A20 Pro 2nm chip, 48MP periscope camera, LiDAR scanner, ProRes RAW, Apple Log 2, Dolby Vision video and MagSafe charging. Galaxy S26 counters with Samsung DeX, Wireless DeX, an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, 8K video, reverse wireless charging and up to seven major Android OS updates.

Verdict

iPhone 18 Pro is the overall winner for its stronger performance platform, more advanced camera hardware, and professional video capabilities. Galaxy S26 remains the better value-focused alternative with a broader practical feature set.

FAQs

1. Which phone has better camera zoom?
The iPhone 18 Pro offers a 4x optical periscope telephoto, compared with the Galaxy S26’s 3x optical zoom.

2. Which phone is better for gaming?
The iPhone 18 Pro’s A20 Pro provides powerful flagship performance, while Galaxy S26 performance varies by region and chipset.

3. Which phone charges faster?
Both support 25W wireless charging, while Samsung offers 25W wired charging and Apple supports 50% charging in 15 minutes.

4. Which phone offers more storage options?
The iPhone 18 Pro offers 256GB through 2TB, while Galaxy S26 ranges from 128GB to 512GB.

5. Which phone is better for long-term use?
Galaxy S26 promises up to seven major Android OS updates, while the iPhone benefits from Apple’s established long-term software support.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• iPhone 18 Pro Max vs Galaxy S26 Ultra: Samsung Has a Big Advantage
• Google Pixel 11 vs Xiaomi 17: Specs, Camera, Battery and Price Compared
• Google Pixel 11 Pro vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Which Phone Gives You More Value?

The post iPhone 18 Pro vs Galaxy S26: Specs, Camera, Battery and Price appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung is giving Indian buyers another way to get its latest flagship smartphones. The Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26 Ultra have now joined Samsung’s Certified Re-Newed program. This brings the two devices to Samsung’s official refurbished sales channel at lower prices.

Galaxy S26 series gets refurbished pricing

The Galaxy S26 Certified Re-Newed model with 256GB storage is priced at Rs 74,799, while the 512GB version costs Rs 91,799. The Galaxy S26 Ultra starts at Rs 1,18,999 for 256GB and goes up to Rs 1,35,999 for the 512GB model. Samsung says the refurbished devices can be priced at up to 85% of their original launch prices, with availability and configurations depending on stock.

The company’s renewal process includes inspection, cleaning, refurbishment, and testing. Samsung uses genuine components when replacements are required, while each phone gets a certified battery that meets its quality and performance requirements. The devices are also reset to remove previous user data and updated to the latest available software before sale.

The Galaxy S26 features a 6.3-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a 120Hz refresh rate, an Exynos 2600 chipset, up to 12GB RAM and 512GB storage. Its camera setup includes a 50-megapixel primary camera, a 10-megapixel telephoto camera with 3x optical zoom and a 12-megapixel ultrawide camera, along with a 4,300mAh battery and 25W wired charging.

The Galaxy S26 Ultra steps things up with a 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display featuring a 120Hz refresh rate and built-in Privacy Display. It uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, offers up to 16GB RAM and 1TB storage, and packs a 200-megapixel main camera alongside 50-megapixel periscope and ultrawide cameras and a 10-megapixel telephoto camera. A 5,000mAh battery supports 60W wired and 25W wireless charging.

For daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

The post Samsung brings Galaxy S26 Ultra and S26 to its refurbished program appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google and Samsung are going head-to-head once again with two compact flagship smartphones packed with premium features. The Google Pixel 11 focuses on AI, photography, and battery versatility, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 brings flagship performance, a refined design, and powerful productivity features. So, which one offers the better value for your money? Let’s find out. 

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Google Pixel 11 and Samsung Galaxy S26 both feature premium glass-and-aluminum constructions with IP68 water and dust resistance. The Galaxy S26 feels noticeably slimmer and lighter, making it the more comfortable option for extended everyday use. The Pixel 11, however, offers a more substantial in-hand feel and adds Satellite SOS support.

Display Quality

Both phones feature sharp 6.3-inch OLED displays with smooth 120Hz refresh rates and HDR10+ support. The Pixel 11 delivers higher peak brightness and a slightly sharper resolution, while the Galaxy S26 uses Dynamic LTPO AMOLED technology and offers a higher screen-to-body ratio. Samsung’s panel looks like the more polished choice for immersive viewing.

Verdict

Choose the Galaxy S26 for its slimmer, lighter design and immersive LTPO display. The Pixel 11 remains a strong alternative with excellent brightness, premium protection, and useful satellite connectivity.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 runs Android 17 on Google’s Tensor G6 chipset with 12GB RAM, focusing on AI-driven experiences and long-term software support. The Galaxy S26 offers Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processors depending on the region. Samsung’s hardware should provide stronger raw performance, particularly for demanding games and intensive multitasking.

Battery and Charging

The Pixel 11 features a larger battery and supports faster 30W wired charging, 25W magnetic wireless charging, reverse wired charging, and bypass charging. The Galaxy S26 offers slower wired and wireless charging, although it includes reverse wireless charging. On paper, the Pixel provides the more versatile charging setup.

Verdict

The Galaxy S26 should appeal to users prioritizing maximum performance, while the Pixel 11 offers a more compelling battery and charging package. For balanced everyday usability, Google’s approach feels particularly practical.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Pixel 11 uses a 48MP main camera, 5x optical telephoto lens, and 120-degree ultrawide camera. The Galaxy S26 counters with a 50MP main camera, 3x telephoto, and 12MP ultrawide lens. Pixel’s longer optical zoom gives it an advantage for distant subjects, while Samsung adds 8K video recording and stronger video-oriented features.

Selfie Camera

The Galaxy S26 has a 12MP autofocus selfie camera with 4K video recording, while the Pixel 11 uses a wider 10.5MP front camera. The Pixel may be more useful for group selfies, whereas Samsung’s camera appears better suited for standard portraits and detailed front-facing video.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 looks stronger for zoom photography, while the Galaxy S26 offers greater video flexibility. Users who value versatile photography may prefer Pixel, whereas video creators could lean toward Samsung.

Pricing

The Google Pixel 11 is priced around $900 / ₹90,000, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 is priced around $900 / ₹88,000. Their pricing is extremely close, making features and ecosystem preferences more important than cost alone. The Galaxy S26 offers flagship-level performance and a refined design, while the Pixel focuses on cameras, battery capacity, and charging versatility.

Is the Price Justified?

Both phones justify their premium pricing with flagship displays, powerful chipsets, advanced camera systems, and seven major Android updates. The Galaxy feels like the better value for users seeking maximum performance, while the Pixel’s stronger zoom and battery features help balance its slightly higher Indian price.

Verdict

With only a small price difference, neither phone has a decisive affordability advantage. The Galaxy S26 offers excellent hardware value, while the Pixel 11 justifies its premium through versatility and features.

Conclusion

The Pixel 11 stands out with its 5x optical zoom, larger battery, magnetic wireless charging, Satellite SOS service, and Google’s AI-focused Tensor platform. The Galaxy S26 brings faster flagship-class processing, Samsung DeX, Wireless DeX, Wi-Fi 7, 8K video, and a lighter design. Both receive long-term software support, making them suitable for buyers planning to keep their phone for several years.

The choice ultimately comes down to priorities. Pixel feels better suited to users who value computational photography, battery capacity, and Google-centric software. Samsung is the more compelling all-rounder for raw performance, productivity, and multimedia features.

Verdict

Overall, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is the better choice for most buyers, thanks to its stronger performance, refined display, slimmer design, advanced video features, and productivity tools. The Google Pixel 11 is still worth considering for its superior zoom camera and battery setup, but at a similar price, the Galaxy S26 delivers the more complete flagship experience. 

FAQs

1. Which is better, Pixel 11 or Galaxy S26?

The Galaxy S26 is the better overall choice for most users, offering stronger performance and broader flagship features.

2. Which phone has the better camera?

The Pixel 11 offers better long-range zoom, while the Galaxy S26 provides stronger video capabilities and a versatile overall camera experience.

3. Is the Galaxy S26 faster than the Pixel 11?

Yes, the Galaxy S26 offers stronger raw performance, especially for demanding games, multitasking, and intensive applications.

4. Which phone has better battery life?

The Pixel 11 has a larger battery and more versatile charging options, potentially making it the better choice for heavy users.

5. Which offers better value for money?

The Galaxy S26 offers better overall value for most buyers, while the Pixel 11 provides greater appeal for photography-focused users.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• Google Pixel 11 Pro XL vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max: Which Flagship Truly Wins?
• Pixel 11 Pro vs Galaxy S26 Ultra: Which Premium Phone Should You Buy?
• iQOO Z11 vs Realme 16x 5G: Which Phone Offers Better Value?

The post Google Pixel 11 vs Samsung Galaxy S26: Camera, Performance, Battery Compared appeared first on Gizmochina.

Vivo X300 E and Samsung Galaxy S26 take two very different approaches to the flagship experience. Vivo focuses on powerful hardware with a massive battery, ultra-bright display, and competitive pricing, while Samsung emphasizes premium software support, ecosystem features, and refined performance. Here’s how they compare across design, performance, cameras, battery life, and overall value.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Vivo X300 E and Samsung Galaxy S26 both offer premium glass-and-metal designs with IP68 water and dust resistance. Vivo adds IP69 protection and an infrared blaster, while Samsung features Gorilla Glass Victus 2, an Armor Aluminum 2 frame, wider eSIM support, and Samsung DeX. Both feel premium, but Samsung emphasizes durability while Vivo focuses on extra practicality.

Display Quality

Vivo features a 6.59-inch AMOLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate, 1.5K resolution, HDR, and up to 5,000 nits peak brightness. Samsung offers a 6.3-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X panel with an adaptive 120Hz refresh rate and 2,600 nits peak brightness. Vivo provides a sharper and brighter viewing experience, while Samsung benefits from better power efficiency.

Verdict

The Vivo X300 E delivers a stronger display with higher brightness, resolution, and refresh rate. Samsung remains appealing for users who value durability, adaptive display technology, and its polished software ecosystem.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Vivo X300 E runs on the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 with UFS 4.1 storage, delivering flagship-level speed for gaming and multitasking. The Galaxy S26 uses either the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600, depending on the region, and promises seven major Android updates. Vivo leads in hardware value, while Samsung focuses on long-term software support.

Battery and Charging

Vivo packs a massive 7,200mAh silicon-carbon battery with 90W wired charging and reverse wired charging. Samsung includes a 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired, 15W wireless, and reverse wireless charging. Vivo offers significantly longer battery life, whereas Samsung adds the convenience of wireless charging.

Verdict

The Vivo X300 E stands out with its huge battery and much faster charging. Samsung is the better choice for buyers who prioritize software longevity, wireless charging, and a mature ecosystem.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Both phones feature a 50MP main camera with OIS. Vivo pairs it with a 50MP 3x periscope telephoto and an 8MP ultrawide camera with Zeiss optics. Samsung combines a 10MP telephoto and a 12MP ultrawide while offering 8K video and advanced computational photography. Vivo has stronger zoom hardware, while Samsung excels in video recording.

Selfie Camera

The Vivo X300 E includes a 50MP autofocus selfie camera capable of 4K recording. Samsung uses a 12MP Dual Pixel autofocus camera with 4K HDR video. Vivo captures more detail, while Samsung delivers consistently natural selfies and dependable autofocus.

Verdict

The Vivo X300 E is better for high-resolution selfies and zoom photography. The Galaxy S26 is the stronger option for users who value refined image processing and class-leading video features.

Pricing

The Vivo X300 E is priced around $700 (approximately ₹68,200), while the Samsung Galaxy S26 is priced around $900 (approximately ₹88,000). Vivo offers flagship hardware, a premium display, a massive battery, and fast charging at a considerably lower price. Samsung’s premium mainly covers longer software support, wireless charging, DeX, and ecosystem advantages, making its higher price reasonable for those features.

Verdict

The Vivo X300 E offers better value for money with stronger hardware at a lower price. The Galaxy S26 justifies its premium through software support, ecosystem integration, and productivity features.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The Vivo X300 E impresses with its 144Hz 1.5K AMOLED display, 7,200mAh battery, 90W charging, Zeiss cameras, and aggressive pricing. The Galaxy S26 stands out with seven years of Android updates, Samsung DeX, wireless charging, durable construction, and advanced video capabilities. Each phone excels in different areas depending on buyer priorities.

Verdict

The Vivo X300 E is the better choice for buyers seeking flagship hardware, outstanding battery life, and excellent value. The Galaxy S26 is ideal for users who prioritize long-term software support, ecosystem features, and a refined flagship experience.

FAQs:

1. Which phone is better for gaming?
   The Vivo X300 E is better suited for gaming thanks to its 144Hz display, larger battery, and flagship Snapdragon chipset.
2. Does the Galaxy S26 have a better camera?
   The Galaxy S26 offers stronger video recording, while the Vivo X300 E has an advantage in zoom photography and selfie resolution.
3. Which phone charges faster?
   The Vivo X300 E supports 90W wired charging, making it significantly faster than the Galaxy S26’s 25W charging.
4. Which phone offers better value for money?
   The Vivo X300 E delivers more flagship hardware for a lower price, making it a stronger value-focused option.
5. Which phone should most buyers choose?
   Choose the Vivo X300 E for hardware and battery, or the Galaxy S26 for software support and ecosystem features.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• Samsung Galaxy S27 Ultra vs Galaxy S26 Ultra: Every Leaked Upgrade Compared
• Nothing Phone (4a) vs Vivo Y500: Is the Extra $200 Worth Paying?
• Redmi Note 17 Pro vs OnePlus Nord CE 6: Full Specs, Price & Camera Comparison

The post Vivo X300 E vs Samsung Galaxy S26: Which Flagship Offers Better Value? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Xiaomi 17T Pro and Samsung Galaxy S26 take very different approaches to the flagship smartphone experience. Samsung focuses on refinement, software support, and premium usability, while Xiaomi counters with powerful hardware, faster charging, and a bigger battery. With both competing in the premium segment, this comparison explores which flagship offers the better overall value. 

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Xiaomi 17T Pro and Samsung Galaxy S26 target different types of flagship buyers. Xiaomi focuses on a premium, feature-packed approach with an aluminum frame, Gorilla Glass protection, IP68 certification, and a larger overall presence. It feels like a device built around multimedia consumption, gaming, and long-term endurance.

Samsung takes a more refined route with its Armor Aluminum 2 frame, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection, and compact flagship philosophy. The Galaxy S26 is easier to handle throughout the day and delivers the polished fit and finish that Samsung’s flagship series is known for. Buyers who prefer one-handed usability may naturally lean toward Samsung, while those wanting a more immersive device may appreciate Xiaomi’s approach.

Display Quality

The Xiaomi 17T Pro gains a significant advantage on paper with its large AMOLED panel, 144Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision support, 3840Hz PWM dimming, and an impressive 3500-nit peak brightness rating. The display feels designed for gaming, video streaming, and HDR content.

Samsung’s Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X panel remains excellent, offering adaptive refresh technology, strong color calibration, and flagship-grade outdoor visibility. However, Xiaomi delivers a more ambitious display package overall.

Verdict

Samsung offers a more compact and refined flagship experience, but Xiaomi delivers the stronger display specifications. For entertainment and visual impact, the Xiaomi 17T Pro takes the win.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Xiaomi 17T Pro is powered by the new MediaTek Dimensity 9500 chipset paired with UFS 4.1 storage and configurations reaching up to 1TB. The hardware is clearly designed for heavy multitasking, gaming, and demanding workloads. The 144Hz display further complements its performance-focused nature.

Samsung counters with either the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600, depending on region. Both are flagship-grade processors capable of exceptional performance while benefiting from Samsung’s software optimization and seven years of Android upgrades. Samsung’s long-term software commitment adds meaningful value for users planning to keep their phone for several years.

Battery and Charging

Battery life is where Xiaomi creates a major separation. Its massive 7000mAh battery, 100W wired charging, and 50W wireless charging are flagship-level highlights. Heavy users can comfortably expect significantly longer endurance.

Samsung’s 4300mAh battery, 25W wired charging, and 15W wireless charging remain practical but look conservative beside Xiaomi’s offering.

Verdict

Samsung offers better long-term software support, but Xiaomi dominates in battery capacity, charging technology, and overall hardware value. The Xiaomi 17T Pro wins this section comfortably.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Both phones feature versatile triple-camera systems, but their strengths differ. The Xiaomi 17T Pro combines a 50MP primary sensor with Leica tuning, a dedicated 50MP periscope telephoto camera offering 5x optical zoom, and an ultrawide lens. The inclusion of a true periscope lens gives Xiaomi a meaningful advantage for long-range photography.

Samsung relies on a proven combination of a 50MP main camera, 10MP 3x telephoto lens, and a 12MP ultrawide camera. Samsung’s image processing is traditionally among the best in the Android segment, producing reliable colors, excellent HDR performance, and highly consistent results.

Video capabilities are excellent on both devices, although Xiaomi’s 4K 120fps recording support provides extra flexibility for enthusiasts.

Selfie Camera

Xiaomi includes a 32MP front camera capable of 4K recording and HDR10+ support. Samsung’s 12MP dual-pixel selfie camera focuses more on consistency, autofocus accuracy, and natural skin tones.

Verdict

Samsung may appeal to users who prefer dependable point-and-shoot results, but Xiaomi offers stronger camera hardware, superior zoom capability, and more versatile video features. The Xiaomi 17T Pro holds the edge overall.

Pricing

The Xiaomi 17T Pro is priced around ₹75,000, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 is priced around ₹88,000. Despite carrying a lower price tag, Xiaomi delivers a larger battery, faster charging, a higher-refresh-rate display, more aggressive camera hardware, and larger storage options.

Samsung’s higher price is partly justified by its premium brand positioning, polished software experience, compact flagship design, DeX desktop functionality, and industry-leading software support policy. Buyers looking for longevity and ecosystem integration may find the additional investment worthwhile.

From a pure specifications standpoint, however, Xiaomi offers substantially more hardware for less money. It is the type of pricing strategy that attracts power users who compare features line by line before making a purchase.

Verdict

Samsung justifies its premium through software, ecosystem features, and long-term support. However, Xiaomi delivers noticeably stronger value for money and offers more flagship hardware per rupee spent.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The Xiaomi 17T Pro stands out with its 7000mAh battery, 100W charging, Leica-branded camera system, 5x periscope zoom camera, 144Hz AMOLED display, and 50W wireless charging. It is clearly designed for users who prioritize performance, battery life, and multimedia capabilities.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 distinguishes itself through seven years of Android upgrades, Samsung DeX support, compact flagship ergonomics, strong software optimization, and the mature One UI experience. These advantages may matter more than raw specifications for some buyers.

Both devices represent different interpretations of a modern flagship. Samsung focuses on refinement and longevity, while Xiaomi emphasizes cutting-edge hardware and aggressive value.

Verdict

For most buyers comparing specifications, battery life, charging speed, display quality, and camera hardware, the Xiaomi 17T Pro emerges as the stronger overall package. The Samsung Galaxy S26 remains an excellent choice for users who prioritize software support, ecosystem features, and a compact premium flagship experience, but Xiaomi delivers more value at its asking price.

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More:

• Xiaomi 17T Pro vs OnePlus 15: Don’t Buy Until You Read This Comparison
• Xiaomi 17T vs Nothing Phone (4a) Pro: Full Specs Comparison
• Xiaomi 17T vs OnePlus 15R Comparison: Which Phone Offers Better Value?

The post Xiaomi 17T Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Comparison: Specs, Camera, Battery & Price appeared first on Gizmochina.

Choosing between the Oppo Find X9s and Samsung Galaxy S26 is not as straightforward as comparing a flagship to a compact premium phone. While Samsung focuses on refinement, software longevity, and ecosystem features, Oppo pushes harder on battery capacity, charging speeds, and display specifications. Both phones target premium buyers, but they approach the experience from very different angles.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Oppo Find X9s features a premium glass-and-aluminum construction with IP68/IP69 protection, giving it excellent resistance against dust, water, and even high-pressure water exposure. The device feels modern and robust, with flagship-grade materials throughout. Samsung’s Galaxy S26 also delivers a premium build, combining Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both sides with an Armor Aluminum 2 frame and IP68 certification. Samsung’s design philosophy remains clean and minimalist, making it appealing for users who prefer understated elegance.

Samsung’s compact form factor may feel more manageable for everyday use, while Oppo’s larger design creates a more immersive experience. The choice largely depends on whether portability or screen immersion is the priority.

Display Quality

Oppo takes a clear lead on paper with its 6.59-inch AMOLED display, 120Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision support, 3,600 nits peak brightness, and higher 1256 x 2760 resolution. The panel also supports 1 billion colors and 3840Hz PWM dimming for improved viewing comfort.

Samsung counters with a 6.3-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display featuring adaptive refresh technology, HDR10+, and a peak brightness of 2,600 nits. While the resolution is lower, Samsung’s display tuning remains among the industry’s best for color accuracy and consistency.

Verdict

Oppo offers the more impressive display specifications and stronger durability credentials. Samsung delivers a refined, premium feel with a display that prioritizes balance over raw numbers. For media consumption, Oppo holds the advantage.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Oppo Find X9s is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s chipset paired with UFS 4.1 storage. Combined with 12GB RAM across all variants, it promises flagship-level multitasking and gaming performance. The Immortalis-G925 GPU should handle demanding titles with ease.

Samsung equips the Galaxy S26 with either the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600, depending on region. Both chipsets are built for top-tier performance and are supported by Samsung’s extensive software optimization. Samsung also promises up to seven major Android upgrades, a significant long-term advantage.

In everyday use, both devices should feel exceptionally fast. Samsung may appeal more to buyers who keep their phones for several years, while Oppo focuses on maximizing hardware performance today.

Battery and Charging

Battery life is where Oppo creates significant separation. The Find X9s packs a massive 7,025mAh silicon-carbon battery with 80W wired charging and support for fast PPS charging standards.

Samsung’s Galaxy S26 includes a 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging. Wireless convenience is useful, but the battery capacity and charging speed lag noticeably behind Oppo.

Verdict

Samsung offers stronger software support and ecosystem integration, but Oppo dominates battery life and charging performance. For power users, Oppo provides a more complete hardware package.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Oppo Find X9s features a balanced triple 50MP camera system, consisting of wide, telephoto, and ultrawide sensors. The telephoto lens supports 3x optical zoom, while Hasselblad color tuning aims to deliver more natural and cinematic images. The ability to record 4K video at up to 120fps further enhances its versatility.

Samsung’s Galaxy S26 uses a 50MP main camera alongside a 10MP telephoto and 12MP ultrawide lens. Samsung compensates with excellent image processing, HDR performance, and 8K video recording. Features like Best Face and Horizon Lock add practical value for photography enthusiasts.

Oppo’s camera hardware appears stronger overall, particularly because all three rear cameras use high-resolution sensors. Samsung, however, continues to excel in computational photography and video stabilization.

Selfie Camera

Oppo includes a 32MP front camera capable of 4K recording at up to 60fps. The higher resolution provides greater flexibility for detailed selfies and content creation.

Samsung’s 12MP dual-pixel selfie camera offers reliable autofocus and strong HDR performance. While the resolution is lower, Samsung often delivers excellent skin tones and consistent results.

Verdict

Oppo wins on hardware specifications and overall camera versatility. Samsung remains highly competitive thanks to image processing and advanced video features, but Oppo provides the stronger imaging package on paper.

Pricing

The Oppo Find X9s is priced around $730 (approximately ₹60,000), while the Samsung Galaxy S26 is priced around $900 (approximately ₹88,000). That creates a substantial price gap despite both phones targeting premium buyers.

For the lower asking price, Oppo delivers a larger battery, faster charging, a higher-resolution display, and a triple 50MP camera setup. These are upgrades that users will notice immediately in daily use.

Samsung’s higher price primarily reflects its software commitment, premium ecosystem, DeX desktop mode, wireless charging support, and brand value. Buyers already invested in Samsung products may find these advantages worthwhile.

From a pure specifications perspective, Oppo appears significantly more aggressive. Samsung’s premium becomes easier to justify for users who prioritize long-term software support and ecosystem integration rather than raw hardware value.

Verdict

The Oppo Find X9s offers substantially better value for money. Samsung provides meaningful extras, but Oppo delivers more flagship hardware for considerably less money.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The Oppo Find X9s stands out with its massive 7,025mAh silicon-carbon battery, 80W charging, Dolby Vision display, IP69 certification, and triple 50MP camera system. It is clearly designed for users who want the strongest hardware specifications possible.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 differentiates itself through seven years of Android updates, Samsung DeX support, wireless charging, advanced ecosystem features, and a polished software experience. These advantages may not appear in specification sheets, but they add long-term value.

Both devices represent different interpretations of a modern flagship. Oppo prioritizes performance, endurance, and hardware innovation, while Samsung focuses on refinement, longevity, and software excellence.

Verdict

For most buyers, the Oppo Find X9s is the stronger overall choice. It delivers a better display, significantly better battery life, faster charging, stronger camera hardware, and a much lower price. The Samsung Galaxy S26 remains an excellent premium smartphone, but Oppo offers the more compelling combination of features and value.

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More:

• Moto G37 Power vs Samsung Galaxy M56: Which Mid-Range Smartphone Should You Buy?
• Oppo Find X9s vs Xiaomi 17 Comparison: Specs, Camera, Battery & Price
• Oppo Find X9s vs Vivo X300 FE: Which Compact Flagship Is Actually Worth Buying?

The post Oppo Find X9s vs Samsung Galaxy S26: Full Comparison of Specs, Camera, Battery and Price appeared first on Gizmochina.

Vivo X300 FE and Samsung Galaxy S26 take two very different approaches to the compact flagship formula. Vivo focuses on aggressive hardware with a huge battery, ultra-fast charging, and Zeiss-powered cameras, while Samsung leans toward refinement, software longevity, and a polished premium ecosystem. This comparison breaks down which flagship actually delivers the better overall experience for performance, photography, battery life, and long-term value.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Vivo X300 FE and Samsung Galaxy S26 both target premium compact flagship buyers, but they approach design differently. The Vivo X300 FE focuses on a more camera-centric and feature-heavy experience with IP68/IP69 protection, Zeiss branding, and a slightly bolder premium look. The aluminum frame and glass finish feel flagship-grade, while the larger battery inside gives the phone a more substantial hand feel.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 takes a cleaner and lighter approach with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection and Armor Aluminum 2 construction. Samsung’s design language feels more polished and minimalist, especially for users who prefer a slimmer flagship that is easier to carry daily. The S26 also benefits from Samsung’s software refinement, which complements the premium hardware well.

Display Quality

The Vivo X300 FE offers a sharper 1.5K LTPO AMOLED panel with extremely high peak brightness and advanced PWM dimming, making it more impressive for multimedia and outdoor visibility. Samsung’s Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X panel remains excellent with strong color tuning and smooth animations, but the lower resolution slightly reduces the wow factor beside Vivo’s display.

Verdict

The Vivo X300 FE feels more ambitious with its brighter and sharper display, while the Galaxy S26 delivers a more refined and compact flagship experience. Users focused on multimedia will likely prefer Vivo, whereas Samsung feels more balanced for everyday premium usage.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

Both phones deliver flagship-grade power, but the Samsung Galaxy S26 pushes slightly ahead in raw processing with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 variants, depending on region. One UI 8.5 also remains among the most optimized Android skins, particularly for multitasking and long-term smoothness. Samsung’s promise of seven major Android upgrades further strengthens long-term usability.

The Vivo X300 FE, however, still offers elite-level performance through the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 chipset paired with UFS 4.1 storage. Gaming performance should remain extremely strong, and OriginOS 6 appears highly fluid. Vivo also includes features like bypass charging, which serious gamers will appreciate during longer sessions.

Battery and Charging

Battery life is where the Vivo X300 FE gains a major advantage. The 6500mAh battery, combined with 90W wired and 40W wireless charging, clearly outclasses Samsung’s smaller 4300mAh battery and slower charging speeds. The difference becomes noticeable for power users and heavy travelers.

Samsung still delivers dependable battery optimization, but Vivo feels more future-ready in charging convenience and endurance.

Verdict

Samsung offers stronger long-term software support and slightly more refined flagship performance, but Vivo dominates battery life and charging. For gaming and heavy usage, the X300 FE feels more practical and less restrictive.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Vivo X300 FE delivers a more aggressive camera setup with dual 50MP sensors, Zeiss optics, and an advanced periscope telephoto lens. The optional external zoom lens system also adds a unique photography-focused appeal rarely seen in mainstream flagships. Its 8K recording, strong stabilization, and better telephoto hardware make it particularly attractive for photography enthusiasts.

Samsung’s Galaxy S26 continues the brand’s reliable flagship camera approach with balanced image processing, dependable HDR, and polished video tuning. The ultrawide camera appears stronger than Vivo’s on paper, while Samsung’s software consistency often produces more social-media-ready photos instantly. Features like Best Face and Horizon Lock also improve usability for casual users.

Selfie Camera

The Vivo X300 FE gains a noticeable edge with its 50MP autofocus selfie camera and Zeiss tuning. Selfies should appear sharper and more detailed, especially in daylight and video calls.

Samsung’s 12MP front camera still delivers reliable skin tones and excellent video quality, but it feels comparatively conservative beside Vivo’s more advanced hardware.

Verdict

The Vivo X300 FE feels like the more camera-focused device overall, especially for zoom photography and selfies. Samsung remains safer for users who prefer consistent processing and effortless point-and-shoot performance.

Pricing

The Vivo X300 FE is priced around $950 or ₹80,000, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 is priced around $900 or ₹88,000, depending on the market and storage configuration. Despite being slightly more expensive globally, Vivo actually appears more aggressive in the Indian market because of its larger battery, faster charging system, and stronger camera hardware.

Samsung, however, carries stronger brand value in the premium segment along with better resale potential and longer software support. Buyers who prioritize ecosystem features like Samsung DeX, polished software updates, and reliability over several years may still find the Galaxy S26 worth the higher pricing in India.

The Vivo X300 FE feels like a flagship designed to maximize specifications for the price, while Samsung positions the S26 as a more refined lifestyle flagship experience.

Verdict

The Vivo X300 FE offers better hardware value overall, especially for battery and camera-focused buyers. The Galaxy S26 justifies its pricing through software longevity, ecosystem integration, and a cleaner flagship experience.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The Vivo X300 FE stands out with its massive battery, ultra-fast charging, Zeiss-enhanced camera system, and sharper LTPO display. It feels designed for enthusiasts who want flagship performance without compromising endurance or camera flexibility. Features like bypass charging and optional zoom lenses also help it feel more experimental and feature-packed.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 focuses more on refinement and long-term ownership. Seven years of Android updates, Samsung DeX support, lighter design philosophy, and One UI optimization create a polished flagship experience that appeals to mainstream premium users. Samsung’s ecosystem integration also remains difficult to match for users already invested in Galaxy devices.

Both phones succeed in different ways. Vivo pushes hardware aggressively, while Samsung emphasizes consistency and longevity.

Verdict

Vivo X300 FE is the stronger choice for users prioritizing battery life, charging speed, and camera versatility. The Samsung Galaxy S26 feels better suited for buyers wanting cleaner software, extended software support, and a more mature flagship ecosystem experience.

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More:

• Sony Xperia 1 VIII vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: Which Ultra Flagship Wins in 2026?
• POCO X8 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Pro: Which Phone Should You Actually Buy?
• Vivo X300 FE vs OnePlus 15R: Full Comparison of Specs, Camera, Battery and Price

The post Vivo X300 FE vs Galaxy S26: Which Flagship Should You Actually Buy? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung’s latest flagship lineup, the Galaxy S26 series, is reportedly seeing strong demand during its pre-order phase. An early industry report (via) indicates that the new devices are attracting significant interest from buyers. At the same time, the Galaxy S26 Ultra has received a major industry award at MWC 2026, highlighting the technological advancements introduced with the series.

Galaxy S26 series pre-orders show strong demand

According to telecom industry sources in South Korea, the Galaxy S26 series is performing well in early pre-order sales. Analysts believe the lineup could surpass the record set by the Galaxy S25 series, which recorded approximately 1.3 million units during its reservation period.

While the final figures have not yet been confirmed, several telecom officials noted that the current sales momentum appears stronger than last year’s flagship lineup. Among the available models, the Galaxy S26 Ultra is reportedly attracting the highest share of demand from buyers.

Samsung executives have also hinted at strong early performance. Company representatives revealed that sales of the Galaxy S26 lineup are currently about 15 percent higher than the previous generation, with the Ultra variant accounting for nearly 70 percent of the orders.

Industry observers believe that a mix of factors is contributing to this strong response. Carrier inventories of the Galaxy S25 series have largely been cleared, encouraging upgrades. In addition, premium smartphone buyers appear to be showing strong interest in the new lineup.

Galaxy S26 Ultra wins Best in Show at MWC 2026

Alongside its early market momentum, the Galaxy S26 Ultra has also received recognition at the Global Mobile Awards (GLOMO) during MWC 2026 in Barcelona. The device won the Best in Show award, one of the highest honours presented at the event.

The judging panel highlighted the device’s integration of advanced hardware with One UI 8.5 software and Galaxy AI features designed to simplify daily tasks while maintaining strong privacy protections.

One of the standout technologies is the built-in Privacy Display, which improves screen privacy without compromising visual quality. Judges noted that the device stood out among thousands of products showcased at MWC because it delivers meaningful innovation that users can experience today.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories.

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 series sees strong pre-orders as Galaxy S26 Ultra wins Best in Show at MWC 2026 appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung has officially announced its next Galaxy Unpacked event, confirming that the Galaxy S26 series will debut later this month. The announcement sets the stage for the company’s upcoming flagship lineup, which has been widely discussed through leaks and early teasers. While the event confirmation does not reveal complete specifications, it offers clarity on the launch timeline and highlights what users can expect from Samsung’s next phase of AI-focused smartphones.

Galaxy Unpacked event details and reservation offers

The Galaxy Unpacked event is scheduled for Feb. 25, 2026, in San Francisco and will begin at 10AM PT. Samsung plans to livestream the presentation via its official website and YouTube channel, allowing global audiences to follow the announcements in real time.

Alongside confirming the launch date, Samsung has opened early reservations, allowing interested buyers to register without any purchase commitment. Customers who reserve can receive benefits such as a $30 credit for accessories, potential trade-in savings of up to $900, and a chance to win a $5,000 Samsung.com gift card. Reservations are also expanding beyond Samsung’s website, with retailers like Best Buy and AT&T expected to participate.

The Galaxy S26 lineup is expected to include three models, namely the Galaxy S26, Galaxy S26 Plus, and Galaxy S26 Ultra. Early reports suggest improvements in performance through a newer Snapdragon chipset for select regions, along with faster wireless charging capabilities. The Ultra variant may introduce a new privacy-focused display feature designed to reduce visibility from side angles, though official confirmation is still awaited.

Apart from smartphones, the event could see the launch of the Galaxy Buds 4 series, including standard and Pro versions. Software advancements are also likely to take centre stage, especially with the anticipated rollout of One UI 8.5 and enhanced Galaxy AI features. Samsung appears to be placing significant emphasis on making AI interactions more personalized and seamlessly integrated into everyday usage.

Retail availability for the Galaxy S26 series is expected around March 2026, with pricing likely to remain similar to previous generations. The return of the Unpacked event to late February also aligns with Samsung’s earlier strategy of launching flagship devices ahead of Mobile World Congress, indicating a renewed focus on setting the pace for the year’s smartphone announcements.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories.

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 series to debut at February 25 Unpacked event appeared first on Gizmochina.

Highlights:

• Galaxy S26 series spotted in WPC database with Qi 2.2.1 support
  
• No built-in magnets; magnetic charging needs a compatible case
  
• Wireless charging speeds may reach up to 25W on the Ultra model

Samsung’s upcoming Samsung Galaxy S26 Series has appeared in the database of the Wireless Power Consortium (WPC), confirming new details about its wireless charging features. The listings, first spotted by 9To5Google, reveal that all three models support the latest Qi 2.2.1 standard.

The listings show the Galaxy S26 (SM-K772), Galaxy S26+ (SM-K777), and Galaxy S26 Ultra (SM-K778). While the certification confirms support for Qi 2.2.1, the same standard used by the Google Pixel 10 series, it also highlights an important limitation: no built-in magnetic Qi2 support.

Samsung is using the Base Power Profile (BPP) instead of the Magnetic Power Profile (MPP). This means the phones do not have built-in magnets. As a result, Qi2 magnetic chargers, power banks, and wallets will not attach directly to the phone. Users will need a magnetic protective case to enable proper alignment and attachment.

Despite this, wireless charging speeds are expected to improve. Reports suggest up to 20W wireless charging on the Galaxy S26 and S26+, and up to 25W on the Galaxy S26 Ultra, likely achievable only with compatible magnetic cases.

Samsung is also preparing a new Qi 2.2–2.2-compatible wireless charging puck designed for the S26 series, expected to launch soon.

Overall, the Galaxy S26 lineup focuses on faster wireless charging while keeping magnets optional through accessories.

Read More:

• OpenAI’s First Hardware Device: AI Earbuds, Strategy Shift, and Launch Timeline
• HarmonyOS 6 (API 23 )Developer Beta Is Live: Full Supported Device List Revealed
• No Humans, Just 16 Claude AI Agents Built a Fully Functional C Compiler, Shocking Developers

(via)

The post Galaxy S26 Series Gets Qi 2.2.1 Certification, But Built-In Magnets Are Missing appeared first on Gizmochina.

Multiple country variants of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra have emerged on the Geekbench benchmarking platform. These listings will make many users happy, as they suggest that the S26 Ultra may come with a Snapdragon chip in all markets. On the other hand, the S26 and S26 Plus may ship with either Exynos or Snapdragon, depending on the region.

Galaxy S26 Ultra country variants spotted on Geekbench

Shown above are the different country variants of the Galaxy S26 Ultra. The SM-S948U is for the US, the SM-S9480 is for China, the SM-S948B is for global markets like Europe and India, and the newly spotted SM-S948N is for South Korea. These listings show that the device is powered by a Qualcomm chip, which will reportedly be marketed as the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy.

Meanwhile, the Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26 Plus have also surfaced on Geekbench multiple times. While the US editions have been spotted with the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, variants for Europe and South Korea have appeared with Samsung’s in-house Exynos 2600 SoC. It is still unclear whether the Chinese market will get Snapdragon or Exynos variants.

Samsung’s apparent return to a dual-chip strategy could indicate that the company is testing the waters with the Exynos 2600, which is the industry’s first 2nm mobile chipsets. After facing criticism in previous years over performance consistency and efficiency differences between Exynos and Snapdragon variants, Samsung opted to use Snapdragon across the entire Galaxy S25 series. Bringing Exynos back selectively may allow the company to evaluate real-world performance improvements while gradually rebuilding user confidence, especially if the new 2nm process delivers meaningful gains in power efficiency and thermal performance.

Based on recent industry reports and Samsung’s usual launch cycle, the Galaxy S26 series is expected to debut on February 25, with sales likely starting by March 11. The same event is also expected to see the arrival of the Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories.

(via)

The post Multiple Galaxy S26 Ultra country variants on Geekbench reveal Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, no Exynos 2600 version appeared first on Gizmochina.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 has, for the first time, been spotted on Geekbench. The model that has appeared on the benchmarking platform is the South Korean edition bearing the model number SM-S942N. Here’s a look at the details that have emerged through the Galaxy S26’s Geekbench listing.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Geekbench listing

The Geekbench listing reveals that the Samsung Galaxy S26 heading to South Korea may feature the Exynos 2600. While the chipset’s name is not explicitly mentioned, it can be identified through its part number, S59965.

The benchmark listing further reveals that the Galaxy S26 has 12GB of RAM and runs Android 16, which is likely to feature the One UI 8.5 skin.

Coming back to the chip, the Exynos 2600 is the world’s first 2nm chip with a 10-core CPU architecture, equipped with a prime core operating at 3.8GHz and an Xclipse 960 GPU. The device has scored around 3,000 to 3,300 in the single-core test and 10,450 to 11,370 in the multi-core test.

As far as other specifications are concerned, the Galaxy S26 is expected to feature a 6.32-inch AMOLED FHD+ display with a 120Hz refresh rate and 2,600 nits of peak brightness. Its rear camera setup may comprise a 50-megapixel main camera with OIS, a 12-megapixel ultra-wide lens, and a 10-megapixel telephoto camera with 3x optical zoom. It may feature a 12-megapixel front camera and pack a 4,300mAh battery with 25W charging.

The Galaxy S26 series includes multiple models, such as the S26, S26+, and S26 Ultra. It appears that the base and Plus models may come in Exynos or Snapdragon versions, depending on the region. On the other hand, there is a possibility that the Ultra edition may ship with the Snapdragon chip in all markets.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories.

(via)

The post Galaxy S26 has Exynos 2600, reveals Geekbench listing appeared first on Gizmochina.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 series of smartphones has been consistently appearing on certification and benchmarking platforms over the past few weeks. Reports have revealed that the Galaxy S26 carries the SM-S942 model number, the Galaxy S26 Plus is expected to use the SM-S947 model number, while the SM-S948 model number is associated with the Galaxy S26 Ultra.

While these monikers are not official yet, they appear to align with Samsung’s usual naming convention. In a new development, the Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26 Ultra have surfaced on the Geekbench database, revealing details related to their chipset, RAM, and operating system.

Galaxy S26 Ultra, Galaxy S26 Geekbench listings

The unlocked US variants of the Galaxy S26 Ultra (SM-S948U) and Galaxy S26 (SM-S942U) have been spotted on Geekbench. Both listings confirm that the devices have 12GB of RAM and Android 16, which is likely to have Samsung’s One UI 8.5 skin on top.

Although the chipset name is not explicitly mentioned in the listings, the CPU and GPU metadata indicate that both phones are powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy. The SoC includes two cores working at 4.19GHz, six cores operating at 3.55GHz, and Adreno 840 GPU.

It appears that the chipset that powers the S26 series is slightly underclocked compared to the standard Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, which includes two cores working at up to 4.6GHz, six cores operating at up to 3.62GHz, and Adreno 840 GPU.

Performance-wise, the Galaxy S26 Ultra scored 3,466 points in the single-core test and 11,035 points in the multi-core test on Geekbench 6.5. Meanwhile, the Galaxy S26 recorded a single-core score of 3,378 and a multi-core score of 11,097, suggesting very similar performance between the two models.

The Geekbench listings suggest that the company could be internal testing the S26 series’ performance weeks before official announcement. As per recent reports, Samsung is expected to launch the Galaxy S26 series on February 26. The lineup is said to go on sale globally in March, following the company’s usual flagship release timeline.

Previously, the S26 series was said to include the S26 Edge, but it has been reportedly cancelled due to weak demand for ultra-thin phones. If you are wondering what happened to the Galaxy S26 Pro, which appeared in early leaks, a report dating back to October revealed that this device does not exist.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories.

(via)

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Galaxy S26 spotted on Geekbench, reveals underclocked Snapdragon chip appeared first on Gizmochina.

Last week, Samsung unveiled that its upcoming Exynos 2600 flagship chipset, which will power the upcoming Galaxy S26 and S26 Plus, will arrive without an integrated modem, marking a clear shift in its silicon strategy. To address this change, Samsung has now announced the Exynos Modem 5410, a new standalone connectivity solution designed to work alongside the processor and define how future Galaxy devices stay connected.

Exynos Modem 5410 promises enhanced connectivity

The all-new Exynos Modem 5410 is a standalone modem designed to pair with next-generation flagship processors. Built on a 4nm EUV process, the modem supports 3GPP Release 17 and delivers download speeds of up to 14.79Gbps through combined sub-6GHz and mmWave connectivity.

Its most notable feature is integrated satellite communication, bringing together LTE Direct-to-Cell, NB-IoT NTN, and NR-NTN on a single chip. This allows voice calls, text messaging, location sharing, and even video communication in areas with no terrestrial network coverage.

Beyond speed and coverage, Samsung has focused heavily on security. The modem supports Hybrid Post-Quantum Cryptography, ensuring sensitive data such as device identifiers remain protected against future quantum-based threats. By separating the modem from the main processor, Samsung can also manage heat more effectively while allowing each component to be optimized independently.

The Exynos 2600 is Samsung’s first 2nm flagship processor and is expected to power select Galaxy S26 models. By removing the integrated modem, Samsung has freed up silicon space for the CPU, NPU, and AMD-based GPU, prioritizing performance, efficiency, and advanced on-device AI.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories.

The post Exynos 5410 modem to bring multi-satellite support to the Galaxy S26 lineup appeared first on Gizmochina.

The Galaxy S26 series is at the centre of a developing supply situation that has drawn attention across the industry. A report from South Korea has revealed that Samsung is preparing for high-level discussions with Micron as it aims to secure stable mobile DRAM for its upcoming flagship. With the smartphone’s launch window nearing, rising memory prices and unsettled contracts have triggered a series of urgent developments that set the tone for what follows.

Samsung seeks emergency talks at CES 2026

TM Roh, who heads Samsung’s DX division, is reportedly scheduled to meet Micron CEO Sanjay Mehrotra on the opening day of CES 2026 in Las Vegas. Such meetings are rarely arranged during the event, but the growing strain on LPDDR5X supply appears to have made this one unavoidable.

Industry insiders say the price surge has been unusually steep. LPDDR5X 12GB modules that were trading at around 30 dollars earlier this year have reportedly jumped to nearly 70 dollars by late November, creating uncertainty in Samsung’s negotiations with both its DS division and Micro. The two suppliers have yet to finalize terms for the Galaxy S26, leaving the smartphone unit under pressure as it approaches mass production deadlines.

Several Korean reports note that memory manufacturers prefer quarterly supply agreements during price upswings rather than longer commitments. This has added another layer of difficulty for Samsung’s mobile division, which is already dealing with increased expenditure on application processors. The situation has elevated Micron’s importance in Samsung’s flagship portfolio, especially after the company supplied a large share of mobile DRAM for the Galaxy S25 series.

New DRAM technologies and internal challenges

Samsung’s DS unit is simultaneously advancing its next-generation LPDDR6 technology, expected to offer higher bandwidth and improved efficiency. Early signs suggest the company may showcase it at CES 2026, although commercial deployment could arrive later. Meanwhile, internal adoption of the Exynos 2600 remains limited, further tightening the mobile division’s budget as it negotiates memory procurement.

With the Galaxy S26 set to debut in early 2026, the outcome of TM Roh’s CES meeting may influence how smoothly Samsung can secure DRAM supply for its next flagship. While the company has declined to comment on its memory plans, the urgency around negotiations underscores the broader industry pressure caused by rising demand and limited production capacity.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories.

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 faces memory supply uncertainty as TM Roh plans rare CES meeting appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung’s next-generation Galaxy S26 lineup could face a significant delay, according to recent reports. The company is reportedly experiencing issues with the development and design of its upcoming flagship phones. As a result, the launch may be postponed by nearly two months, shifting from the usual January timeline to March next year. The information comes from Techmaniacs, a German publication that has shared early insights into the state of Samsung’s next premium devices.

Galaxy S26 Ultra reportedly ready, but S26 is not

According to the report, the Galaxy S26 Ultra has already completed its development phase and is ready for production. However, the base Galaxy S26 is still behind schedule, which may be contributing to the expected delay. While this could push the official unveiling, the Ultra model is said to be shaping up as a notable upgrade, particularly in display and performance.

The Galaxy S26 Ultra will reportedly feature a 10-bit display that supports one billion colors, marking a clear improvement over the 8-bit screen used in the Galaxy S25 Ultra. Powering the device will be the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy chipset paired with 12GB RAM. The 5,000mAh battery remains unchanged, but charging speed is set to increase to 60W, allowing an 80% charge in about 30 minutes.

The standard Galaxy S26 is expected to use the Exynos 2600 chipset, a move seen as an effort to strengthen Samsung Semiconductor after recent setbacks in its client base. Although the phone’s design is not yet complete, it is expected to adopt a minimal and refined look once finalised.

With rumours suggesting the cancellation of the Galaxy S26 Edge model, Samsung’s 2025 lineup could instead include the Galaxy S26, S26+, and S26 Ultra variants.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories.

(source)

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 launch could be delayed by two months, here’s why appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung Electronics is reportedly close to finalizing a wide-ranging deal to preload Perplexity AI’s technology on its devices, Bloomberg reports. According to people familiar with the discussions, this deal would see Perplexity’s search features integrated into Samsung’s products, thereby enhancing the South Korean company’s AI capabilities.

Preloading and deeper integration in Galaxy S26 and beyond

The agreement under discussion involves preloading the Perplexity app and assistant on future Samsung devices, with Samsung aiming to make it a default assistant option in the upcoming Galaxy S26 lineup, expected to launch in the first half of 2026. Talks have also touched on integrating Perplexity’s search features directly into Samsung’s web browser, offering a more comprehensive and AI-powered search experience. Additionally, there are plans to incorporate Perplexity’s technology into Samsung’s Bixby virtual assistant. The specific terms and final details, however, have yet to be finalised and may change.

In a further move to deepen their collaboration, Samsung is expected to be among the largest investors in a new funding round for Perplexity, which is reportedly seeking to raise $500 million at a valuation of $14 billion. This partnership could enable Samsung to diversify its reliance away from Alphabet’s Google and embrace a broader mix of AI technologies, similar to the approach Apple has taken.

For Perplexity, this would be its biggest mobile partnership to date, coming after a recent deal with Motorola. Meanwhile, Apple has also reportedly explored working with Perplexity to integrate the AI search engine into Siri as an alternative to Google Search and ChatGPT. The impact of Samsung’s tie-up on these parallel discussions remains to be seen.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories.

(source)

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 may integrate Perplexity AI as a default assistant appeared first on Gizmochina.