The OPPO Reno3 and Reno3 Pro will be OPPO’s first mid-range 5G smartphones. While we are excited about both phones, we are actually eager to see how they measure up against each other since they will come with different processors. The Reno3 will be the first phone to be powered by MediaTek’s Dimensity 1000L processor while the Reno3 Pro will come with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 765G. Benchmark app, Master Lu, has released the benchmark results for both phones, giving us a chance to compare the two chipsets.

It is important to mention that other than the processors, the RAM of both phones benchmarked is different. The Reno3 has 12GB of RAM which TENAA doesn’t state but is listed on the JD pre-order page, while the Reno3 Pro has 8GB of RAM. There will also be a 12GB RAM version of the Reno3 Pro and it will be available with 128GB or 256GB of storage.

[envira-gallery id=”296043″]
CPU

For the CPU score, the 2.3GHz Snapdragon 765G wins with a total of 134,320 points as against the 2.2GHz Dimensity 1000L’s 110,392 points. Where it surpasses MediaTek’s processor is in the Multi

GPU

The winner here is MediaTek as the Dimensity 1000L scores 104,188 points against the Snapdragon 765G’s (Adreno 620 GPU) 97,786 points.

Memory Performance

The Reno3 wins here again with 50,392 points, which is no surprise as it has 12GB RAM as against the Reno3 Pro’s 8GB RAM and 40,695 points.

Storage Performance

The winner here again is the Reno3 with 40,695 points. Its read speed 1015MB/s and its write speed is 219MB/s while the Reno3 5G has a read score of 589MB/s and a write speed of 236MB/s. The read speed of the Reno3 is almost twice that of the Pro version which is unusual.

Overall Score

The Snapdragon 765G-powered Reno3 Pro wins with 307,855 points while the Dimensity 1000L is not too far behind with a total score of 305,667 points.

Conclusion

The Snapdragon 765G is the more powerful processor but the Dimensity 1000L is no slouch either and we are most impressed with its GPU score. While these are just prototypes that have been benchmarked, we look forward to real-life comparisons of the final product.

 

(Source)