Xiaomi‘s independent Redmi brand is expected to officially unveil the Redmi Note 9 series on March 12. As usual, the rumour mill will keep buzzing until the device will be officially launched. Recent rumour point to the existence of a minimum of two models – Redmi Note 9 Pro and Redmi Note 9 Pro Max but there is likely a Redmi Note 9 model as well while uncertainty trails the existence of a Redmi Note 9 Pro Max variant. 
Ahead of the launch, a Redmi phone suspected to be the Redmi Note 9 Pro has appeared on FCC’s website. The listing gives us an idea of some of the key specifications of the device including the battery power.
The device appears with the model number M2003J6A1G and is listed to pack a massive 4,920mAh battery. The device is also tipped to bring along fast charging support that maxes out at 30W. The device will run on the latest MIUI 11 ROM based on Android 10. 
The FCC listing didn’t reveal further details but previous GeekBench appearance revealed the Redmi Note 9 Pro will feature a Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G chipset, paired with 6GB of RAM. The device will definitely have other RAM variants.
We expect to get more details of the device as the days roll by.
UPDATE: More details of the Redmi Note 9 Pro has emerged via Twitter from Akshay Aggarwal. The leak shows the Redmi Note 9 Pro will feature a 6.67-inch FHD+ display having a 20:9 aspect ratio and 60Hz refresh rate. The display will adopt a hole-punch selfie camera design with a Samsung GG5 sensor onboard. The camera supports 960fps Slo-mo shoot. The Note 9 Pro will be fired up by a Snapdragon 720G processor paired with a base memory setup of 4GB RAM and 64GB storage.
In addition, the device is said to pack a bigger 5,020mAH battery with 18W fast charge support as against 27W scooped from the FCC listing. For photography, the Redmi Note 9 Pro is expected to feature a Quad camera setup that has a Samsung GM2 main sensor. There is equally an 8MP Wide-angle sensor, a 5MP macro camera and a 2MP depth sensor.
UP NEXT: Alleged Honor 30 5G phone 3C certified
(via)
Comments