The Samsung Galaxy S23 series is scheduled to debut through the Galaxy Unpacked event that is scheduled to take place on Feb. 1v. Leaks that have surfaced so far have revealed what the Galaxy S23, S23+, and S23 Ultra will look like. Now, Winfuture.de has published a fresh set of renders of the Galaxy S23 to give a good look at its design and color options.
In the following renders, the Galaxy S23 can be seen in four colors like Phantom Black, Cotton Flower (white), Botanic Green, and Mystic Lilac (pink / purple). The images show that Samsung is not offering an entirely new design for the Galaxy S23. Instead, the Galaxy S23 appears to be a refined version of its predecessor.
The Galaxy S23 does not have a raised camera island like the S22. As can be seen, only the individual protrudes from the rear shell of the device. As per the report, the device will feature a metal frame and a glass back. The frame and the rear shell have the same colors. For a better grip, the S23 has a slight curvature towards the edges.
On the front, the Galaxy S23 can be seen sporting a flat display. The small punch-hole on the screen is said to house a new 12-megapixel selfie camera. The rear camera setup of the phone is expected to include a 50-megapixel main camera, a 12-megapixel ultra-wide lens, and a 10-megapixel telephoto camera. The device will have a 6.1-inch AMOLED FHD+ display that offers a 120Hz refresh rate.
The Galaxy S23 will be powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chip and a 3,700mAh battery with 25W fast charging and wireless charging support. It is expected to come in two configurations, such as 8 GB RAM + 128 GB storage and 8 GB RAM + 256 GB storage.
RELATED:
- Samsung Might Not Launch a Galaxy S24 Plus Next Year
- Samsung Galaxy A54, A34 Official Renders Leak Before Launch
- Samsung Galaxy S23 Unpacked Launch Event Date Officially Confirmed
- Tecno Phantom X2 5G Review – A Brave Attempt to Take on Established Rivals
- Amazfit Pop 2 Review – Budget Watch with AMOLED Screen, Bluetooth Calling
- Motorola X40 Review: Good, but could do better
(Source)