Earlier this week, a report revealed that Apple is working on a slim model for the iPhone 17 series that will replace the Plus variant. While the report outlined many possible specifications of this new phone, it left out details about the camera system. Now, renowned Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has shed some light on this.
According to Kuo, the iPhone 17 Slim will feature just a single rear camera. If this pans out, it would be the first single-camera iPhone in the mainline series since the iPhone 8.
Kuo says Apple will “emphasize innovative form factor design” with the iPhone 17 Slim “rather than competing on hardware specifications.” In simple words, the clear focus seems to be on aesthetics and portability, compared to the standard and Pro models.
The rest of the leak largely confirms previous rumors. The iPhone 17 Slim is expected to have a 6.6-inch display with a 1260×2740 resolution. Under the hood, it will likely house the A19 chip, a step down from the A19 Pro expected in the Pro models. And the notch replacement, the Dynamic Island, will carry over from current iPhones.
However, there are some conflicting details. While earlier reports suggested that the iPhone 17 Slim would have an aluminum frame, Kuo says it will actually use titanium, though with a lower titanium content than that of the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max models.
Kuo leak also diverges regarding the modem. The 17 Slim is rumored to use Qualcomm modems, but he now suggests it will feature Apple’s own in-house 5G chip. If true, we could see it in other iPhone 17 models as well.
Even though we are getting these details from reliable sources, it’s essential to treat them with caution, as details about devices this far out from release are subject to change.
Kuo also shared insights into why Apple is discontinuing the iPhone Plus model. He notes that the iPhone Plus currently accounts for only about 5% to 10% of iPhone shipments, which likely influenced the decision. This move could be a risky gamble for Apple, but it might also prove successful.
(Source)
Comments