The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) is a popular budget-friendly smartphone that offers excellent value for its price. It features a high-quality screen, a good camera setup, and an octa-core processor. The battery lasts more than a day, and most importantly, it brings wireless charging support and a built-in stylus that we typically don’t see in budget phones.
The Galaxy A35 isn’t without its benefits. It’s an excellent mid-range option with longer software support, strong battery backup, and capable cameras. It costs $100 more than the Moto G Stylus 5G. So, is it worth spending the extra $100, or is the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) still the better deal? Here, we break down the differences to help you make a better decision.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy A35: Design and build
Both smartphones have clean, modern aesthetics. The Galaxy A35 has slightly thicker bezels and more rounded corners, which results in a lower screen-to-body ratio compared to the Moto G Stylus 5G. The selfie cutout also takes more space on the Samsung phone.
The Galaxy A35 features Gorilla Glass Victus+ for added protection, while the Moto G Stylus 5G has a vegan leather back, giving it a more premium feel and better resistance to fingerprints compared to the glass back of the Galaxy A35.
Additionally, the Galaxy A35 is IP67-rated for dust and water resistance, whereas the Motorola phone lacks an IP rating. The Samsung phone is also a little heavier and thicker.
On top of everything, the Moto G Stylus 5G has a built-in stylus, which is rare among budget phones. This unlocks a whole new level of creativity and makes the device more senior-friendly. The Galaxy A35 doesn’t have a stylus.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy A35: Display
Both smartphones have flat, high-quality displays with 120Hz refresh rate support and almost the same screen resolutions. However, there are some key differences as well. For instance, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) supports 10-bit color depth, whereas the Galaxy A35 supports 8-bit color depth. This means the Motorola phone can show a wider range of colors for a more immersive viewing experience.
The Motorola phone’s screen is a little bigger, at 6.7 inches (vs. 6.6 inches on the Galaxy A35). Additionally, it has a higher peak brightness for better visibility outdoors.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy A35: Performance and software
The Motorola smartphone has the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset at its heart, whereas the Samsung Galaxy A35 is driven by the in-house Exynos 1380. While both chips use the same CPU cores, those in the Exynos chip run at a higher speed, offering additional performance boost.
The Mali-G68 MP5 GPU inside the Exynos 1380 also performs better than the Adreno 710 GPU inside the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. Here are benchmarking scores to give you a better picture:
AnTuTu v10 score (higher is better):
| Moto G Stylus (2024) | Galaxy A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu score | 554,132 | 602,845 |
| CPU | 197,313 | 198,446 |
| GPU | 94,070 | 136,210 |
| Memory | 118,839 | 111,256 |
| UX | 143,910 | 156,932 |
Geekbench v6 score (higher is better):
| Moto G Stylus (2024) | Galaxy A35 | |
| Single core | 934 | 1,021 |
| Multi core | 2,674 | 2,937 |
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test (higher is better)
| Moto G Stylus (2024) | Galaxy A35 | |
| Best loop score | 2,362 | 2,822 |
| Lowest loop score | 2,351 | 2,779 |
| Stability | 99.6% | 98.6% |
On all three benchmarking platforms that we tested both phones on, the Samsung phone comes at the top.
Overall, the Galaxy A35 offers better performance, but the Moto G Stylus 5G still provides a smooth, lag-free experience for everyday tasks like browsing, messaging, and scrolling through social media feeds.
The software support goes entirely in favor of Samsung, thanks to its impressive update policy. The Galaxy A35 promises four generations of OS updates, whereas the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) will get just one. This has been a long-standing problem with Motorola phones. Newer models, however, do come with extended software support.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy A35: Camera
The Motorola phone’s cameras have been upgraded from its predecessor. The 50MP primary camera now comes with OIS support. While it doesn’t match Google Pixels, the shots are nice and detailed in daylight. However, the low-light performance is just okay-ish.
The Galaxy A35’s primary camera also retains good details and produces share-worthy shots when there’s sufficient light but struggles with low-light shots. It has an 8MP ultrawide camera, while the Motorola phone has a 13MP ultrawide sensor.
The Galaxy A35 also has a 2MP macro shooter, which is just useless. The Motorola phone doesn’t have a dedicated macro camera but instead uses the 13MP ultrawide sensor to achieve good macro shots, which look way better than the Galaxy A35.
Motorola phone takes good selfie photos and videos with its 32MP camera. The Galaxy A32 features an 8MP selfie camera that can also take decent photos and videos. As for the video quality, both smartphones support 4K recording using front and rear cameras.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy A35: Battery and charging
While both phones have the same 5,000mAh battery capacity, the battery backup isn’t the same as it depends on various factors such as chip efficiency, software optimizations, and more. In our case, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) comes at the top with an extra hour of battery life over the Galaxy A35. However, the Samsung phone lasts a little longer when gaming. Both phones comfortably last for at least a day, though.
Additionally, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) supports 30W wired charging, whereas the Galaxy A35 peaks at 25W. However, both take nearly one and a half hours to reach 100%. The Motorola phone also benefits from 15W wireless charging support. The Samsung phone doesn’t let you power it wirelessly.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy A35: Misc
The Samsung phone has better connectivity features. It brings Wi-Fi 6 support for enhanced speed and efficiency. It should also provide better Wi-Fi performance in crowded spaces. The Galaxy A35 also supports a newer Bluetooth standard, which offers better connection stability and data transmission.
Another plus point for the Motorola phone is the 3.5mm headphone jack, which is absent on the Galaxy A35.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy A35: Which one should you buy?
The Motorola phone offers a high-quality display experience, decent camera performance, and slightly better battery life. Its standout features include a built-in stylus, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and wireless charging support—none of which are found on the Galaxy A35.
On the other hand, the Galaxy A35 is more durable with Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ and an IP67 rating. It also delivers faster performance, longer OS updates, and better connectivity with newer Bluetooth and Wi-Fi standards.
If durability and long-term software support are your top priorities, the Galaxy A35 is the better choice. Otherwise, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) offers great value and saves you around $120.
Comments