Advertisement

Timex has released three new iterations of its Waterbury Classic watch in the US market. The updated models introduce a textured dial and a sub-second display, moving away from a standard sweeping second hand. The new lineup includes two leather strap options priced at $189 and a stainless steel bracelet variant for $239.

Timex Waterbury Classic watches

Design Details

All three watches share the exact same physical dimensions and core hardware. They feature a 39mm polished silver-tone stainless steel case. The lug-to-lug distance measures 46mm, and the case height sits at 10mm, making it a mid-sized watch designed to fit wrist circumferences between 150mm and 205mm. The dial is covered by a slightly domed mineral glass crystal.

The watches feature a textured dial with a dedicated seconds sub-dial at 6 o’clock. They use a battery-powered quartz movement with an SR626SW battery and offer 50-meter water resistance, suitable for splashes and light swimming but not snorkeling or diving.

The three models differ primarily in their colorways and strap materials. The first model (TW2Y92100) features a black dial with gold-tone hands and hour markers, paired with a brown leather strap. The second model (TW2Y92000) has a white dial with silver-tone hardware and comes with a black leather strap. Both leather straps are 20mm wide, feature a crocodile grain pattern, and are sourced from the Leather Working Group. They secure with a standard buckle.

The third model (TW2Y91900) shares the black dial and gold-tone accents of the first model but replaces the leather strap with a two-tone stainless steel bracelet. This metal version uses a deployant clasp rather than a standard buckle, which accounts for the higher $239 price tag.

All three of the new Waterbury Classic watches are currently available for purchase directly through the Timex US website.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Timex 1,2,3)

Comments