Samsung’s long-rumored tri-fold phone is edging closer to reality, and a new leak gives us a clearer idea of how the company plans to set it apart. Unlike Huawei’s Mate XT or the recently launched Mate XTs, which go for a Z-style layout, Samsung seems to be trying something different with its first triple-folding device.

Shared by leaker @TechHighest on X, official-looking One UI animations show the Galaxy Tri-Fold folding around a central cover display. That means when the device is shut, the usable front screen sits in the middle section instead of on the outermost panel. It’s a departure from expectations, but one that could have some practical benefits—like making it easier to use the main cameras for selfies, since they sit just to the side of the cover screen.

This central positioning could improve ergonomics, letting users hold the folded device by the inactive panels while avoiding smudges on the cover screen. For those wondering, the wireless and reverse wireless charging coil is placed below the camera module, meaning the phone can be used much like a regular bar phone while charging wirelessly or sharing power. It looks like Samsung has put some thought into making the tri-fold practical in everyday use.

The main display size isn’t confirmed, though earlier reports suggest something close to 10 inches when fully unfolded. That would put it in the same ballpark as Huawei’s Mate XTs. Samsung is also expected to keep its traditional Fold lineup going, so the Galaxy Z Fold7 remains an option for buyers who prefer the classic two-panel design.

The leaked One UI animations suggest Samsung isn’t just following Huawei’s lead but carving out its own identity in the tri-fold space. The company has already confirmed that the ‘Galaxy Z TriFold’ will debut before 2026, with a recent leak pointing to an October launch.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source)

Comments