A high-end Xiaomi device has shown up in benchmark testing. It offers an early look at what is expected to become the next flagship under the Poco brand.
A Xiaomi phone with the model number 26077PC53G has appeared in the Geekbench database. According to tipster Abhishek Yadav, this is the upcoming Poco F9 Ultra. The listing shows it’s powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset paired with an Adreno 840 GPU. In the test it scored 2,980 in single-core and 10,030 in multi-core. The phone is also confirmed to come with 16GB of RAM and run Android 16.
These numbers put it firmly among the current top performers in Android. Previous rumors suggest the Poco F9 Ultra is basically a global rebranded version of the REDMI K100 Pro Max, though with a slightly smaller 8,050mAh battery. The display is expected to be a 6.9″ AMOLED panel with a 1200 × 2608 resolution, 185Hz refresh rate, and peak brightness up to 4,500 nits.
On the camera side, the phone is rumored to pack a 200MP main sensor with optical image stabilization, a 50MP periscope telephoto, a 50MP ultrawide, and a 32MP front camera. These specs line up with the high-end positioning of recent Redmi K-series Pro Max models that usually get adapted for international markets under the Poco name.
No official announcement or pricing details have been shared yet. The Geekbench appearance does confirm that development is well advanced and that the device is already going through performance validation. Once it launches, the Poco F9 Ultra is expected to compete in the premium segment by offering flagship-level processing power, a high-refresh-rate display, and a versatile camera system at a price aimed at people who want strong performance without paying the absolute top flagship rates.
More details should emerge as the phone gets closer to its official reveal.
Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
(Source: Geekbench)
Comments