Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5: Specs Comparison

    14

    The foldable smartphone niche has been evolving rapidly, and two heavyweights, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5, are at the forefront of this revolution. Both have their unique selling propositions and offer different experiences. In this in-depth analysis, we’ll break down every aspect to see which one comes out on top. The allure of a foldable phone is undeniable. Combining compactness with a large screen real estate is a tech enthusiast’s dream. Motorola and Samsung have approached this dream from their distinct perspectives, grounded in their company histories and vision for the future.

    Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

    Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
    DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHT 170.8 x 74 x 7 mm,
    185 g
    165.1 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm,
    187 g
    DISPLAY 6.9 inches, 1080 x 2640 pixels (Full HD+), AMOLED 6.7 inches, 1080 x 2640 pixels (Full HD+), Foldable AMOLED
    PROCESSOR Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, octa-core 3 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, octa-core 3.36 GHz
    MEMORY 8 GB RAM, 256 GB – 12 GB RAM, 256 GB – 12 GB RAM, 512 GB 8 GB RAM, 256 GB – 8 GB RAM, 512 GB
    SOFTWARE Android 13 Android 13, One UI
    CONNECTIVITY Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, Bluetooth 5.3, GPS Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, Bluetooth 5.3, GPS
    CAMERA Dual 12 + 13 MP, f/1.5 + f/2.2
    Single 32 MP f/2.4 front camera
    Dual 12 + 12 MP, f/1.8 + f/2.2
    10 MP f/2.2 front camera
    BATTERY 3800 mAh, fast charging 30W, wireless charging 5W 3700 mAh, fast charging 25W and wireless charging 15W
    ADDITIONAL FEATURES 5G, dual SIM 5G, dual SIM, IPX8 certification, reverse wireless charging

    Design

    Beginning with design aesthetics, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra harkens back to the days of the original Razr flip phone, giving it a nostalgic yet modern appeal. Measuring 170.8 x 74 x 7 mm and weighing 185g, it’s a device that feels solid in the hand, yet sleek enough to slip into a pocket without fuss. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5, at 165.1 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm and 187g, is a testament to Samsung’s commitment to innovation. Having already released several iterations in their Z series, they have refined the design to near perfection. The slight weight increase gives it a premium feel without being burdensome. From a build perspective, Samsung’s experience in the foldable domain provides them an edge, with a hinge mechanism that feels more robust and a more refined folding experience. Motorola, although not a newcomer, still feels like it’s playing catch-up in this aspect.

    Display

    The quality of a display is paramount, especially when the whole premise of the device is its foldability. Motorola’s Razr 40 Ultra offers a 6.9-inch AMOLED display with a 1080 x 2640 pixel resolution, ensuring vivid colors and sharp contrasts. The deep blacks and rich hues are perfect for media consumption. Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip5, although slightly smaller at 6.7 inches, matches the Razr in terms of resolution. Furthermore, Samsung’s prowess in display technology (they’re one of the leading manufacturers of OLED panels globally) implies not just quality in color reproduction but also durability – an essential factor for foldables.

    Specs & Software

    Diving into the heart of these devices – their performance – we find powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon processors in both. The Razr 40 Ultra is powered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (octa-core, 3 GHz), offering seamless multitasking and gaming experiences. The Z Flip5 has a slight edge, with its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, an octa-core beast clocking at 3.36 GHz. For power users, this slight boost can make a notable difference, especially when running resource-intensive apps or multitasking.

    On the software side, while both devices run Android 13, their experiences diverge considerably due to their overlays. Motorola’s interface is closer to stock Android – minimalistic, efficient, and without bloat. It’s a purist’s delight. Samsung’s One UI, overlaying the Android base, offers a plethora of additional features, customization options, and integrations specific to Samsung’s ecosystem. While this might be overwhelming for some, others might appreciate the added functionalities.

    Camera

    The camera setups on these phones cater to the modern user who demands versatility and quality. The Razr 40 Ultra’s dual 12 MP + 13 MP rear setup, complemented by a 32 MP selfie camera, promises sharp photos with good dynamic range. Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip5 opts for dual 12 MP rear sensors, with a 10 MP front camera. Given Samsung’s legacy in post-processing, camera software, and overall imaging technology, it’s a tough call on which is superior without a hands-on comparison.

    Battery

    Battery life is a concern with high-res, large displays. The Razr 40 Ultra packs a 3800 mAh battery, with 30W fast charging. The Z Flip5 is close with its 3700 mAh battery but offers 25W fast charging and an impressive 15W wireless charging feature. The added IPX8 certification and reverse wireless charging on the Z Flip5 are significant advantages.

    Price

    The decision between Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 boils down to brand loyalty, specific feature preferences, and budget. Both phones are top-tier, innovatively designed, and promise robust performances. Whether you want the nostalgic flair of the Razr or the refined innovation of the Z Flip5, the future of foldables looks bright. Both phones start from about €1200 or $940 in the global market.

    Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5: PRO and CONS

    Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

    PRO

    • IPX8 waterproof
    • Reverse wireless charging
    • Better chipset
    • More compact

    CONS

    • Smaller display

    Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

    PRO

    • Better camera
    • Faster charging
    • Wider display
    • Bigger battery

    CONS

    • Inferior chipset

    RELATED

    Check the latest videos from our YouTube channel and subscribe:

    * Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.