In a recent development, the United States government took decisive action on Monday by including 43 new entities on its “Entity List,” a measure designed to regulate exports. These entities have been accused of engaging in activities that jeopardize national security, specifically by providing training to Chinese military pilots.

Out of the 43 entities, 31 originate from China, with the remaining entities located in countries such as the United Arab Emirates, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. The US government has stated that this move was made to safeguard its national security interests.

Out of the 31 banned Chinese entities, the spotlight is now on Shanghai Supercomputing Technology Co, an enterprise backed by the Shanghai Supercomputer Centre (SSC) and Chinese supercomputer manufacturer Dawning Information Industry. 

The US administration accused the company of engaging in activities aimed at acquiring US-origin items to support China’s military modernization efforts. This move underscores the administration’s concerns regarding technology transfers that could potentially contribute to China’s military capabilities.

The Bureau of Industry and Security, a division of the US Department of Commerce, stated that the targeted entity has provided assistance to supercomputers within the People’s Republic of China, particularly by offering cloud-based supercomputing capabilities for hypersonics research. The agency emphasized that these activities run counter to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States.

China’s Reaction to the New Sanctions:

The Chinese Foreign Ministry strongly criticized the decision made by the United States. Wang Wenbin, a spokesperson for the ministry, expressed China’s firm opposition to the move and demanded an immediate correction from the US. Wang further accused the US of becoming an extreme and unethical state by baselessly targeting Chinese companies, driven by its desire to maintain military and technological dominance. He emphasized that China will persist in taking necessary measures to firmly protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises.

The comments from the Chinese Foreign Ministry reflect escalating tensions between China and the US, particularly in the realm of technology and national security. This latest rebuke comes as the US has been implementing various restrictions and sanctions on Chinese entities, raising concerns about the potential impact on bilateral trade relations and global technology competition. 

The ongoing conflict highlights the growing struggle for dominance in the military and technological arenas and the implications it holds for both countries and their respective interests. He Weiwen, a senior fellow at the Center for China and Globalization, criticized the recent actions as being rooted in a Cold War mindset and lacking support from market logic and economic principles.

A  mainland-based analyst further said that Shanghai Supercomputer Centre (SSC) holds a crucial position in China’s computing power strategy, serving important roles in national defense, scientific advancement, technological innovation, and economic growth. While the recent US sanctions are anticipated to have some impact on computing power supply in Shanghai and neighboring areas, as well as the sanctioned entity’s collaborations with American companies, the analyst suggested that significant and industry-wide damages akin to those witnessed in China’s semiconductor sector are unlikely. This is due to China’s already established independent innovation capabilities and market competition within its computing center industry.

The country’s ability to sustain independent innovation and foster competitive market dynamics within its computing centers instills confidence in mitigating potential adverse effects caused by the sanctions. The situation underscores the ongoing competition between the US and China in the technological realm and highlights China’s efforts to bolster its self-reliance and maintain stability in critical sectors.

Related:

(via)