Europe is making headlines with a groundbreaking deal on artificial intelligence (AI) regulations. This isn’t just any agreement; it’s a first-of-its-kind effort to bring legal oversight to AI technologies, including popular generative AI services like ChatGPT. These technologies are more than just buzzwords; they’re changing our lives, but not without raising some serious concerns.

Europe will be the first continent to draft and pass legislations around AI

After some intense negotiations, the European Union has achieved a tentative political agreement for the Artificial Intelligence Act. This act is a big deal because it’s going to set clear rules for using AI, making the EU the first continent to do so. The agreement was hard-won, with discussions lasting hours and tackling hot-button issues like generative AI and the use of facial recognition by the police.

Artificial Intelligence
Credit: Markus Winkler

What’s interesting is that the details of the law are still a bit hazy. It won’t take effect until 2025 at the earliest, and there’s still some fine-tuning to be done. It looks like Europe is trying to set a global standard with this act, having already taken an early lead in 2021. But with the rapid growth of generative AI, they’ve had to update their plans.

This act isn’t just about making rules; it’s about addressing the risks AI poses, like job loss, privacy invasion, and even threats to human life. The EU is setting a precedent for the world, and other major players like the US, UK, and China are also getting in on the action with their own AI regulation proposals.

One key aspect of the EU’s AI Act is its focus on foundation models, which are the sophisticated systems behind services like ChatGPT. These models, which are based on vast amounts of internet data, can create new content, unlike traditional AI. The act aims to place extra scrutiny on the most advanced models, especially those that pose significant risks.

The debate over AI-powered facial recognition was particularly tricky. European lawmakers wanted a full ban on public use due to privacy concerns, while member countries sought exceptions for serious crimes. A compromise was eventually found, balancing privacy with security needs.

RELATED:

(Via)