Advertisement

Samsung’s next midrange phones are getting expensive. Tipster Sudhanshu Ambhore on X spotted the upcoming Galaxy A57 and Galaxy A37 on a European retail listing, revealing the price of two phones. And yes, it suggests a price hike.

If the leak is accurate, the Galaxy A57 with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage could cost €439. The higher-end model with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage may go up to €539.

The Galaxy A37, meanwhile, is listed at €539 for the 8GB RAM + 128GB variant, while the 8GB RAM + 256GB model could reach €609.

For comparison, Samsung launched the Galaxy A36 and the Galaxy A56 at starting prices of €379 and €479, respectively, for the same storage variants. That means Samsung may be planning a €60 price increase across the board without increasing memory or storage. 

What to expect from the Galaxy A37

According to leaks, the Galaxy A37 could be powered by Samsung’s Exynos 1480 chipset, the same processor used in last year’s Galaxy A55. 

Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Galaxy A37 in certification listing

It will feature a triple rear camera setup, headlined by a 50-megapixel primary sensor with OIS, an 8-megapixel ultra-wide, and a 5-megapixel macro camera. The phone could pack a 5,000mAh battery with 45W charging support.

Some reports also suggest the device could ship with Android 16 and One UI 8.5, though that may depend on its final release date.

What to expect from the Galaxy A57

The Galaxy A57 is expected to sit slightly higher in Samsung’s lineup. It may feature a newer Exynos 1680 processor and a 6.6-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate.

Samsung-Galaxy-A57-Design
Samsung Galaxy A57 in TENAA listing

It’s also said to come with a 5,000mAh battery and 45W charging. Other possible features include IP67 water resistance and stereo speakers.

Samsung has yet to announce the device officially.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Via)

Comments