Amazfit Pop 3S vs Moto Watch 200: Specs Comparison

    By
    Michele Ingelido
    -
    20

    If you’re in the market for a smartwatch that is not only feature-rich but also comes from a reputable smartphone manufacturer, you might find yourself torn between the Amazfit Pop 3S and the Moto Watch 200. Both of these smartwatches offer an array of features and specifications that cater to a variety of needs. This comparison between the two should help you make an informed decision.

    Huami Amazfit Pop 3S vs Motorola Moto Watch 200

    Huami Amazfit Pop 3S Motorola Moto Watch 200
    DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHT 43.3 x 36.3 x 9.7 mm, 31 grams 46.5 x 38 x 12.3 mm, 45 grams
    DISPLAY 1.43 inches square, 320 x 302p, AMOLED 1.78 inches square, 348 x 442 pixels, AMOLED
    PROCESSOR / /
    MEMORY / /
    SOFTWARE Zepp OS Moto Watch OS
    CONNECTIVITY Bluetooth 5.0, NFC Bluetooth, GPS
    SPORT MODES 60+ 28
    BATTERY 230 mAh, up to 9 days Up to 14 days, 355 mAh
    ADDITIONAL FEATURES GPS, accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 sensor, waterproof 5 ATM GPS, accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 sensor, waterproof 5 ATM

    Design

    The Amazfit Pop 3S and Moto Watch 200 both sport a square design, reminiscent of the Apple Watch. The Motorola smart watch, however, is slightly larger and heavier than the Amazfit Pop 3S. It comes in two color options: Phantom Black and Gold, and features an aluminum case. The Amazfit Pop 3S, on the other hand, is available in three color options: black, pink, and green. Both smartwatches are waterproof up to 5 ATM.

    Display

    Both smartwatches come with AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Motorola Watch 200 has a larger 1.78-inch display with a higher resolution of 348 x 442 pixels, while the Amazfit Pop 3S features a 1.43-inch display with a resolution of 320 x 302 pixels.

    Specs & Software

    The Amazfit Pop 3S runs on Zepp OS, while the Moto Watch 200 operates on Moto Watch OS. Both smartwatches offer Bluetooth connectivity, but the Motorola wearable has the newer Bluetooth 5.3 LE and also includes built-in GPS. The Amazfit Pop 3S supports over 60 sport modes, while the Moto Watch 200 supports 28. However, the Watch 200 boasts a larger 355 mAh battery that can last up to 14 days with regular usage, compared to the Amazfit Pop 3S’s 230 mAh battery that lasts up to 9 days.

    Price and conclusion

    Choosing between the Amazfit Pop 3S and Moto Watch 200 will ultimately depend on your specific needs and preferences. If you prefer a larger display, longer battery life, and built-in GPS, the Watch 200 may be the better choice. However, if you prefer a lighter design and a wider range of sport modes, the Amazfit Pop 3S could be the better option. So, both the Amazfit Pop 3S and Moto Watch 200 offer a range of features that make them competitive choices in the smartwatch market.

    The best choice between the two will depend on your specific needs and preferences. If you prefer a larger display, longer battery life, and built-in GPS, the Moto Watch 200 may be the better choice. However, if you prefer a lighter design and a wider range of sport modes, the Amazfit Pop 3S could be the better option. Unfortunately, we still do not know how much the Motorola Moto Watch 200 will cost, so it is definitely impossible to do a price comparison with its rival. But we know that the Amazfit smart watch debuted in India with a listing price of Rs. 3,999 which roughly translates into about $50.

    Amazfit Pop 3S vs Motorola Moto Watch 200: PRO and CONS

    Amazfit Pop 3S

    PRO

    • Lightweight design
    • Waterproof up to 5 ATM
    • 60+ sport modes
    • SpO2sensor

    CONS

    • Smaller display compared to Moto Watch
    • Lower battery life

    Motorola Moto Watch 200

    PRO

    • Larger display
    • Longer battery life
    • Built-in GPS
    • Bluetooth 5.3 LE

    CONS

    • Heavier than Amazfit Pop 3S
    • Fewer sport modes

    RELATED

    Check the latest videos from our YouTube channel and subscribe: