In the highly competitive market for affordable smartphones, two new options from Redmi are worth considering – the Redmi Note 13 Pro and the Redmi Note 13. Both devices offer impressive features at attractive price points. The Redmi Note 13 Pro boasts a larger display, powerful processors, advanced camera technology, and faster charging capabilities. On the other hand, the Redmi Note 13 offers a more budget-friendly option with a slightly smaller display and less advanced specifications.
Let’s dive deeper into the comparison of these two devices.
Specification Table:
Redmi Note 13 Pro vs Redmi Note 13
Table of Contents
Specifications | Redmi Note 13 5G | Redmi Note 13 Pro |
---|---|---|
Display | 6.67-inch FHD+ Super AMOLED, 60/90/120Hz, 1000 nits peak brightness | 6.67-inch 1.5K OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, 1800 nits peak brightness, Dolby Vision, HDR10+ |
CPU & GPU | MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710 GPU |
Memory & Storage | Up to 12GB LPDDR4X RAM, Up to 256GB UFS 2.2 storage, expandable via microSD | Up to 16GB LPDDR5 RAM, Up to 512GB UFS 3.1 storage |
Rear Camera | 100MP main, 2MP depth | 200MP main, 8MP ultra-wide, 2MP macro |
Front Camera | 16MP | 16MP |
Additional Features | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor, 3.5mm audio jack, IP54 rated | In-display fingerprint sensor, 3.5mm audio jack (Pro only), Dolby Atmos, IP54 rated |
Dimensions & Weight | 161.11×74.95×7.6mm, 173.5g | 161.15×74.24×7.98mm, 187g |
Battery & Charging | 5000mAh, 33W fast charging | 5100mAh, 67W fast charging |
Starting Price | 1,199 yuan (approx. USD 164 / Rs. 13,640) | 1,499 yuan (approx. USD 205 / Rs. 17,320) |
Design:
The Redmi Note 13 Pro features a sleek and modern design with slim bezels and a glass back. It also offers dust and water resistance (IP54) for added durability. On the other hand, the Redmi Note 13 has a similar design language but lacks dust and water resistance.
Display:
The Redmi Note 13 Pro takes the lead in the display department with its 6.67-inch 1.5K OLED display. It offers a high refresh rate of 120Hz, ensuring smooth and fluid visuals. The Redmi Note 13, on the other hand, features a 6.67-inch FHD+ Super AMOLED display with upto 120Hz refresh rate.
Specs & Software:
When it comes to processing power, the Redmi Note 13 Pro offers two variants – one with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset and another (Pro+) with the MediaTek Dimensity 7200-Ultra processor. Both variants come with ample RAM and storage options. The Redmi Note 13, on the other hand, is equipped with the MediaTek Dimensity 6080 processor and comes in multiple RAM and storage configurations.
Camera:
In terms of camera technology, the Redmi Note 13 Pro takes a leap forward with its impressive 200MP main camera and a 16MP front camera. It also offers additional lenses for ultra-wide and macro photography. The Redmi Note 13, on the other hand, features a 100MP main camera and a 16MP front camera.
Battery:
Both devices offer decent battery capacities, with the Redmi Note 13 Pro packing a larger 5100mAh battery and the Redmi Note 13 featuring a 5000mAh battery. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro takes the lead in terms of charging speed, offering 67W fast charging compared to the Redmi Note 13’s 33W fast charging.
Price:
In terms of pricing, the Redmi Note 13 Pro is available at various price points, ranging from 1,499 yuan (USD 205) for the 8GB + 128GB variant to 2,099 yuan (USD 287) for the 16GB + 512GB variant. On the other hand, the Redmi Note 13 comes at a more affordable range, starting from 1,199 yuan (USD 164) for the 6GB + 128GB variant to 1,699 yuan (USD 232) for the 12GB + 256GB variant.
Redmi Note 13 Pro vs Redmi Note 13: PROS and CONS
Redmi Note 13 Pro
PROS
- Larger and higher-resolution display
- More powerful processors
- Advanced camera system
- Faster charging capabilities
- Dust and water resistance
- 3.5mm audio jack
CONS
- Higher price range compared to Redmi Note 13
- Slightly heavier
Redmi Note 13
PROS
- More budget-friendly option
- Decent processing power and camera capabilities
- Good battery performance
- 3.5mm audio jack
CONS
- Smaller and lower-resolution display
- Slower charging speed
- Lacks dust and water resistance