Motorola is reportedly gearing up for the next version in its Razr lineup. A Motorola phone with model number XT2551 has recently been spotted on India’s BIS portal. This device follows the model number sequence of the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (XT2451), and hence, is expected to be the Razr 60 Ultra.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra bagged the certification earlier than its predecessor
For reference, the predecessor bagged the BIS certification in April 2024, and it went live in India in July 2024. If Motorola keeps up with this pattern, then the Razr 60 Ultra may hit the stores around mid-2025. Details of the device, however, remain scarce, leaving everyone guessing as far as design and specifications are concerned.
The Indian smartphone market has been a bright growth area for Motorola, as the company registered its highest growth last year. According to 91mobiles, the Razr 60 Ultra could hit the shelves in the second quarter of 2025.
According to previous reports, the phone could be powered by the Snapdragon 8s Elite chip, which is said to be similar to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in performance. You can check out the recently leaked benchmark insights of the chipset here.
What else to expect?
For perspective, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra sports a Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset, a 50MP primary camera, and a 50MP 2x telephoto lens. The device features a 4-inch outer display and a 6.9-inch inner display, in only 7.1mm thick, and weighs 189 grams. Compared to the Galaxy Z Flip6, the Razr 50 Ultra is differentiated by a higher screen-to-body ratio for the outer display, which means more space for app content and a premium look.
The Razr 60 Ultra is expected to build on these features with at least marginal improvements in both design and performance. Whether it’s a thinner profile, better battery life, or advanced camera capabilities, Motorola’s next flip phone could be an exciting choice for those seeking a foldable device in 2025. With its BIS certification already in place, the wait for more details on the Razr 60 Ultra might not be too long.
(Via)
Comments