Motorola Edge 50 and Edge 50 Fusion are gorgeous-looking smartphones, packed with solid hardware at a mid-range price. The two phones don’t bring a significant gap in the pricing, but deep within there are significant differences. Here, we’ll dig deeper into the differences and find out how these two Motorola phones stack up against each other..
Motorola Edge 50 vs Edge 50 Fusion: Which offers more value for your money?
Design and durability
Both Motorola phones share a premium design aesthetics with curved displays and rounded corners, giving them a sleek and slim appearance. The front looks almost identical, but the Edge 50’s back appears a bit asymmetrical. The vegan leather finish on both phones adds a premium touch and offers a more comfortable grip than traditional glass backs.
While both have a similar design language, the Edge 50 is a step further when it comes to durability. It’s MIL-STD-810H-certified, making it more resistant to challenging conditions.Additionally, the Edge 50 features an aluminium frame, whereas the Edge 50 Fusion has a plastic frame. Both phones are IP68 certified, though.
Display
Both smartphones have a nearly 6.7-inch pOLED curved screen with a peak brightness of 1600nits, which ensures good outdoor visibility. The Edge 50 boasts a higher refresh rate of 144Hz (120Hz in Latin America), while the Edge 50 Fusion sticks to 120Hz. The Edge 50 also offers a higher resolution, resulting in crisper and detailed content.
The curved screen is a common trait among Edge models and contributes to a slimmer profile, but it can also lead to reflections and accidental touches. That shouldn’t bother much if you’ve used a curved screen before.
Camera
The Edge 50 features a triple-camera setup on the back, which includes a 50MP OIS-enabled primary sensor, a 13MP ultrawide camera, and a 10MP telephoto camera with OIS and 3x optical zoom. The primary camera captures excellent shots that are vibrant and detailed, particularly when there’s sufficient light around. HDR performance is good, effectively showing details in both darker and lighter areas.
The ultrawide camera on the Motorola Edge 50 isn’t a lot impressive. It generally produces too soft images. However, the third one — telephoto camera — makes this an interesting camera setup on a budget phone. We rarely see this on budget phones, which significantly improves the zoom performance.
On the other hand, the Edge 50 Fusion has dual-rear cameras: a 50MP primary shooter and a 13MP ultrawide camera. The photos are quite good for its price, with solid HDR and decent low-light performance. The ultrawide performance is decent, though the shots can sometimes be blurry.
In terms of video, the Edge 50 can shoot 4K videos from all cameras (including the selfie camera), whereas the Edge 50 Fusion supports 4K only from its main camera. The video quality isn’t particularly impressive across all sensors on both phones. The camera app isn’t impressive either. It may take a few seconds to open, and the lens switching also shows noticeable lag.
Performance and Software
Both Motorola phones offer smooth everyday performance, but the Edge 50 has a slight edge in terms of CPU and GPU performance, although the gap isn’t massive. So, you’ll likely experience better performance on the Edge 50 with demanding activities like gaming, video rendering, and multitasking.
Take a look at the benchmark result below.
AnTuTu performance
| Moto Edge 50 | Moto Edge 50 Fusion | |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu score | 722,133 | 631,172 |
| CPU | 250,766 | 211,572 |
| GPU | 162,656 | 130,884 |
| Memory | 150,446 | 134,023 |
| UX | 158,266 | 154,693 |
In AnTuTu benchmarks, the Motorola Edge 50 pulls ahead of the Edge 50 Fusion with a noticeably higher overall score. The Edge 50 delivers better performance across all key areas—CPU, GPU, memory, and UX—indicating it’s the more capable device for multitasking, gaming, and overall responsiveness. The Edge 50, though, isn’t much behind.
Geekbench performance
| Moto Edge 50 | Moto Edge 50 Fusion | |
|---|---|---|
| Single core | 1,080 | 1,016 |
| Multi core | 2,965 | 2,917 |
In Geekbench tests, both the Motorola Edge 50 and Edge 50 Fusion deliver similar results, but the Edge 50 holds a slight advantage. It scores marginally higher in both single-core and multi-core performance.
3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
| Moto Edge 50 | Moto Edge 50 Fusion | |
|---|---|---|
| High score | 825 | 799 |
| Low score | 818 | 793 |
In the 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test, both the Motorola Edge 50 and Edge 50 Fusion show excellent thermal stability, with minimal performance drop under sustained load. The Edge 50 delivers slightly better peak and sustained GPU performance, but the difference is very small.
Motorola promises to offer five major Android updates to the Edge 50 but only three for the Edge 50 Fusion. This means the Edge 50 will receive Android 19 as their final upgrade, but for the Fusion model, Android 17 will be the end of the road. The Edge 50 will also receive an additional year of security updates.
Battery and Charging
Both Motorola phones come with a 5,000mAh battery and 68W fast wired charging. The phones easily last for a day on regular usage, and the fast charger gives you hours of use with just a few minutes of plug-in time.
The key difference is that the Edge 50 also supports 15W wireless charging, lacking on the Edge 50 Fusion.
Motorola Edge 50 vs Edge 50 Fusion: Conclusion
The Motorola Edge 50 and Edge 50 Fusion are both solid mid-range smartphones that deliver excellent value. However, if you want a more premium build, sharper display, better long-term software support, and a more versatile camera setup with telephoto capabilities, the Edge 50 is clearly the better choice. It also offers slightly stronger performance and the added bonus of wireless charging.
However, if you’re looking to save a bit without sacrificing too much, the Edge 50 Fusion still delivers a well-rounded experience with solid performance, attractive design, and good battery life.
| Edge 50 Pro | Edge 50 Fusion | |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | August 2024 | May 2024 |
| Body | 160.8 x 72.4 x 7.8 mm 180 g IP68 rating MIL-STD-810H compliant | 161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mm 175 g IP68 rating |
| Display | 6.67″ pOLED display 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution 120Hz refresh rate HDR10+, 1600 nits (peak) Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | 6.7″ pOLED display 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution 144Hz refresh rate, 120Hz (Latin America only) 1600 nits (peak) Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4nm) | Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (Latin America only) |
| Rear Camera | 50MP (main): OIS, f/1.8, 1/1.56″ 10MP (telephoto): OIS, f/2.0, 3x optical zoom 13MP (ultrawide): f/2.2, 120˚ FOV up to 4K video recording | 50MP (main): OIS, f/1.9, 1/1.4″ 13MP (ultrawide): f/2.2, 120˚ FOV up to 4K video recording |
| Front Camera | 32MP: f/2.4 up to 4K video recording | 32MP: f/2.5 up to 4K video recording |
| Battery | 5,000mAh capacity 68W (wired) 15W (wireless) | 5,000mAh capacity 68W (wired) |
| OS | Android 14 5 Android updates | Android 14 3 Android updates |
| Audio | Stereo speakers | Stereo speakers |
| Connectivity | 5G/4G/3G/2G Wi-Fi 6E Bluetooth 5.2 NFC USB Type-C 2.0 | 5G/4G/3G/2G Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Bluetooth 5.2 NFC USB Type-C 2.0 |
Comments