Advertisement

Xiaomi launches new AI-powered split air conditioner with rapid 15-second cooling

Xiaomi has expanded its home appliance lineup with the release of the Mijia Air Conditioner Powerful Wind Pro. Following the launch of the standard model last month, this upgraded version is now available on Xiaomi Mall in China for an introductory price of 3,299 yuan ($484), compared to its retail price of 4,899 yuan ($719).

Xiaomi Mijia Powerful Wind Pro AC

Mijia Powerful Wind Pro AC Specifications

While technically a 1.5HP+ wall-mounted air conditioner, Xiaomi claims it delivers the output of a bulkier 2HP floor-standing model. Under the hood, it pairs a 13cc dual-cylinder compressor with dual-row pure copper condensers and evaporators. This hardware combination achieves a peak cooling capacity of 6500W and a heating capacity of 8800W, allowing the system to start pushing cold air in 15 seconds or warm air in 30 seconds.

Xiaomi Mijia Powerful Wind Pro AC

Internally, Xiaomi reworked the thermal exchange system to double the condenser’s surface area for heat exchange, which also helps slightly lower the unit’s operating noise. To handle harsh weather, it uses a dynamic refrigerant control system that keeps the air conditioner running steadily in outdoor temperatures ranging from -20°C to 55°C.

The system relies on a 118mm cross-flow fan to distribute up to 1,000 cubic meters of air per hour. Rather than blowing air directly at people, it uses targeted airflow modes to improve comfort in the room. During cooling, the unit pushes cold air toward the ceiling to let it naturally drop, and during heating, it directs warm air down toward the floor.

For energy efficiency, it holds a Level 1 energy efficiency rating with an Annual Performance Factor (APF) of 6.30. By utilizing built-in energy management algorithms, Xiaomi estimates the unit uses about 404kWh less electricity per year than a standard Level 3 model.

Xiaomi Mijia Powerful Wind Pro AC

As expected from a Mijia appliance, the unit ties directly into Xiaomi’s broader smart home ecosystem. It runs on HyperOS and uses a dedicated AI module to handle local processing. You can adjust settings using the companion app, XiaoAI voice controls, or even the dashboard of a connected Xiaomi car before you get home.

Beyond the smart integrations, the system includes standard utility options like self-cleaning for both the indoor and outdoor units, anti-mildew drying, and a child lock.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories! 💡

(Xiaomi Mall)

Oppo Find X9 Ultra users report strange pink tint issue in videos

Oppo’s latest flagship phone, the Find X9 Ultra, is running into an unexpected camera issue just weeks after launch. Some users are reporting that white objects in videos sometimes end up looking pink or magenta, especially when using certain camera modes.

The issue started gaining attention on Chinese social platforms during the May Day holiday. Some users noticed white clouds appearing pink in recorded footage, while others showed examples where buildings, tiles, or clothing suddenly shifted color after switching zoom levels.

One clip circulating online shows the phone displaying a white building normally in the live preview, only for parts of it to turn noticeably pink when moving to 2x zoom. According to users, the problem seems to happen more often on the main and ultra-wide cameras. Switching to the telephoto lens apparently reduces or completely removes the tint in some situations.

People have also tried restarting the phone, but the issue keeps coming back, which points more toward image processing than hardware failure.

Oppo customer service has since acknowledged the problem and confirmed it is a known software bug affecting the Find X9 Ultra. The company says they have already identified the cause, and a fix is planned through an OTA update expected later this month.

The timing is not ideal for Oppo, especially since the Find X9 Ultra was marketed heavily around camera quality and Hasselblad color tuning. The phone launched with a strong focus on professional imaging features, so users spotting obvious color problems this early has naturally raised some concerns online.

To Oppo’s credit, the company seems to have responded fairly quickly. While there is still no broader public statement, customer support is already telling affected users that a software update is on the way.

Software bugs around camera tuning are not exactly rare on new flagship phones, particularly ones using aggressive computational photography.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source)

Xiaomi is putting AI chips in air conditioners to make them more efficient

Coming home to a warm house and waiting for the air conditioner to catch up is a familiar routine. According to Xiaomi president Lu Weibing, that delay usually isn’t a hardware flaw; it is simply a software limitation. Traditional air conditioners operate on fixed cooling curves, meaning they deliver the same level of cooling regardless of the room’s actual conditions or how long you have been inside. To change this, Xiaomi is introducing new appliances that use on-device AI to manage their own settings.

Xiaomi Air Conditioner

The first product in this updated lineup is the Mijia Air Conditioner Strong Wind Pro. Instead of relying solely on a manual temperature input, the unit uses a built-in AI chip paired with a cloud-based model to learn a household’s specific environment and usage patterns.

The practical application here is a balance of energy efficiency and comfort. For instance, the system is designed to recognize when you first arrive home and temporarily increase its cooling power to bring the temperature down quickly. Later, when it is time for sleep, it can automatically lower its output to run more quietly and use less electricity. The goal is to create an appliance that adjusts itself based on context, rather than waiting for manual remote commands.

Xiaomi is applying a similar concept to floor cleaning with the new Mijia Robot Vacuum Mop 6 Max. While basic obstacle avoidance is standard on most modern robot vacuums, they can still struggle with complex room layouts, which often leads to missed spots.

These hardware updates tie into a broader corporate strategy. Earlier this year, Xiaomi committed to investing over $9 billion into AI research over the next three years. While much of the tech industry’s recent focus has been on generative text and chatbots, Xiaomi is trying to integrate AI into standard household hardware.

It is a more grounded approach to the current AI trend. Rather than simply adding a conversational voice assistant to every appliance, the company is using machine learning to handle basic, behind-the-scenes adjustments, such as making sure the living room is cool when you walk in and not wasting power when you are asleep.

In related news, Xiaomi has recently launched the Mijia Refrigerator 400L French-style model with 60-minute automatic ice-making support.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories! 💡

(Source, Via)

Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 vs Dimensity 9400 Plus: Benchmark score, spec sheet, and more

Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 vs Dimensity 9400 Plus

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 is one of the most popular high-end smartphone chipsets right now. It’s packs a custom-designed Oryon CPU, a capable GPU that offers excellent gaming performance and stability, and modern connectivity features. Many of the camera capabilities have been borrowed from the top-tier 8 Elite Gen 5 SoC, which is also a big plus for the 8 Gen 5.

The Dimensity 9400 Plus, on the other hand, is a top-tier flagship chipset, but the fact that it’s priced around the same as Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 phones makes the battle more interesting. Let’s look at the benchmark scores, spec sheet, and crucial differences to figure out how these two flagship chips fare against each other.

Quick verdict:
– Choose Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 if you prioritize CPU performance, robust connectivity with higher 5G download speed and mmWave bands, and a premium ISP pipeline.
– Choose Dimensity 9400 Plus if you prioritize sustained gaming performance, faster Wi-Fi speeds, and longer phone-to-phone Bluetooth connections.

Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 vs Dimensity 9400 Plus: Spec sheet

Snapdragon 8 Gen 5Dimensity 9400 Plus
AnnouncedNovember 2025April 2025
Process node3 nm (TSMC)3 nm (TSMC)
CPU2 × 3.8 GHz (Oryon Gen 3 – Prime)
6 × 3.32 GHz (Oryon Gen 3 – Performance)
1 × 3.73 GHz (Cortex-X925)
3 × 3.3 GHz (Cortex-X4)
4 × 2.4 GHz (Cortex-A720)
GPUAdreno 829
ray tracing support
Snapdragon Elite Gaming features
Arm Immortalis-G925 MP12
ray tracing support
MediaTek HyperEngine Adaptive Gaming Technology
NPUQualcomm Hexagon NPU
Agentic AI support
MediaTek NPU 890
Agentic AI support
MemoryLPDDR5x, up to 4.8 GHzLPDDR5x, up to 5.3 GHz
StorageUFS 4.1UFS 4 + MCQ
CameraQualcomm Spectra triple AI ISP (20-bit)
up to 320MP single camera
up to 108MP single camera with zero shutter lag, 30fps
up to 48MP triple cameras with zero shutter lag, 30fps
up to 4K/120fps video recording
real-time semantic segmentation (limitless)
MediaTek Imagiq 1090 ISP
Up to 320MP single camera
Up to 8K/60fps video recording
real-time semantic segmentation
Full range HDR zoom
Gen-AI Telephoto
ConnectivitySnapdragon X80 5G modem
download speed: up to 10 Gbps
upload speed: up to 3.5 Gbps
Wi-Fi 7 (peak speed: 5.8 Gbps)
Bluetooth 6.0
3GPP Release-17 5G modem
download speed: up to 7 Gbps
Wi-Fi 7 (peak speed: 7.3 Gbps)
Bluetooth 6.0

Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 vs Dimensity 9400 Plus: Benchmark score

Geekbench score

Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 vs Dimensity 9400 Plus - Geekbench score

On Geekbench 6, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 pulls ahead in both single-core and multi-core tests, although the differences aren’t huge. The single-core score is up by 3%, and the multi-core score is 8% higher than that of the Dimensity 9400 Plus.

Snapdragon 8 Gen 5Dimensity 9400 Plus
Single core2,8372,753
Multi core9,3528,590

AnTuTu score

Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 vs Dimensity 9400 Plus - AnTuTu score

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 achieves about a 4% higher AnTuTu score than the Dimensity 9400 Plus. But this doesn’t offer much clarity unless you look at the breakdown of the total AnTuTu score.

Snapdragon 8 Gen 5Dimensity 9400 Plus
AnTuTu score2,961,2362,832,547
CPU914,878853,898
GPU974,4021,012,010
Memory382,729377,443
UX689,228589,197

The Snapdragon chip still maintain an edge over the Dimensity 9400+ in CPU performance with a 7% higher score, but the GPU score favors the Dimensity chip, which gets about a 4% higher score.

Looking at the benchmark scores, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 feels like a more performance-friendly option, but that alone doesn’t tell the complete picture. One should also consider other key metrics, such as camera capabilities and connectivity upgrades, to make an informed decision.

Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 vs Dimensity 9400 Plus: Key differences

CPU, GPU, & NPU

Both chipsets feature an all-big-core CPU design, but differ notably in CPU clusters and peak performance. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 utilizes Qualcomm’s custom-designed Oryon CPU, featuring a ‘2+6’ configuration. This includes two prime cores and six performance cores.

The Dimensity 9400 Plus features a tiered ‘1+3+4’ CPU configuration, consisting of one Cortex-X925 prime core, three Cortex-X4 performance cores, and four Cortex-A720 performance cores. The CPU has a peak frequency of 3.73 GHz, while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 reaches 3.8 GHz. The latter also excels in higher speeds on secondary scores.

For gaming and other graphics-intensive tasks, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 features an Adreno 829 GPU with a full suite of Snapdragon Elite Gaming features, including Snapdragon Adaptive Performance Engine 4.0 and Qualcomm FPS 3.0, further optimizing game performance and power efficiency.

The Dimensity 9400 Plus uses a 12-core Arm Immortalis-G925 GPU, paired with many game-related features, including MediaTek Frame Rate Converter 2.0+ and MediaTek Adaptive Gaming Technology (MAGT) 3.0, to deliver excellent gaming performance and stability. MediaTek says the chip delivers PC-grade ray tracing capabilities.

Turning to AI capabilities, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 features an upgraded Hexagon NPU that delivers 46% faster performance than its predecessor (8 Gen 3). This is the first Qualcomm chip to embed hardware matrix acceleration into the Oryon CPU, enabling the CPU to execute matrix-intensive AI subtasks without offloading everything to the NPU. The 8 Gen 5 also supports contextually-aware agentic AI that can learn and adapt to offer personalized assistance.

The Dimensity chip features the MediaTek NPU 890, which supports new generative and agentic AI models. Specifically, it has full support for the DeepSeek-R1-Distill (1.5B/7B/8B) model with on-device processing.

Camera

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 inherits many of the camera capabilities from the top-tier 8 Elite Gen 5 chip. It includes a 20-bit Triple AI ISP, up to 320MP camera support, and 4K video recording at 120fps. On top of a robust ISP pipeline, the chip uses AI to process data frame by frame in real time for accurate optimizations. The chip also supports real-time tone control, Night Vision 3.0 for low-light environments, and Snapdragon Audio Sense for HDR audio recording without noise.

In contrast, the Dimensity 9400 Plus features an Imagiq 1090 ISP that promises to offer “DSLR-like experience.” It also supports up to 320MP camera resolution and 4K video recording at 120fps, and adds features such as Full-range HDR zoom, Gen-AI Telephoto, and Lightning Snapshot Camera.

Connectivity

While both chipsets offer cutting-edge connectivity features, there are several key differences worth paying attention to. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 supports both sub-6GHz and mmWave bands, but the Dimensity 9400 Plus focuses primarily on sub-6GHz. The official product page doesn’t mention mmWave support.

The Snapdragon chip also has an edge in peak download speed, supporting up to 10Gbps, while the Dimensity 9400 Plus can reach up to 7Gbps on a 5G connection. On Wi-Fi connection, though, the Dimensity chip offer a higher peak speed of 7.3Gbps (vs. 5.8Gbps on the 8 Gen 5).

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 natively integrates Ultra Wideband (UWB) along with AI-powered proximity solutions to help you find lost items. It also integrates many features to improve the connectivity stability and power efficiency. The Dimensity chip also includes many connectivity enhancements, including Triple Band Triple Concurrency and phone-to-phone Bluetooth connections up to 10km.

Sony’s Xperia 1 VIII AI camera demo backfires after overexposed samples go viral

Sony’s newly launched Xperia 1 VIII was supposed to highlight the company’s continued focus on creators and mobile photography. Instead, much of the conversation online this week has ended up revolving around a few badly received demo images.

The Xperia 1 VIII launched on May 13 with flagship hardware, including the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chip, ZEISS-branded cameras, expandable storage, and even a headphone jack — features Sony continues to keep around while most brands have moved on. But shortly after launch, Sony’s official Xperia account on X posted a set of “before and after” images to showcase the phone’s new AI Camera Assistant feature, and things quickly went sideways.

Rather than looking improved, the AI-processed shots appeared massively overexposed. Highlights were blown out, colors looked washed, and in some examples, details nearly disappeared entirely. One portrait sample in particular drew attention because the subject’s face looked almost faded away after processing.

The reaction online was immediate. Nothing CEO Carl Pei reposted the images with the comment, “This must be engagement farming??” Other creators joined in as well, and before long, social media had turned the whole thing into a meme. Users started posting exaggerated “AI enhanced” edits of their own, some reduced to completely white images with sarcastic captions thanking Sony for the upgrade.

Sony later clarified that the AI Camera Assistant is not meant to automatically edit photos after capture. The feature instead suggests different shooting styles and settings based on the scene, including exposure, color tone, lens effects, and bokeh adjustments. Users can then pick one of those styles or ignore them entirely.

The company also shared additional examples afterward that looked considerably more reasonable than the originals.

Whether it was simply a poor marketing example or indeed an engagement farming, the situation ended up overshadowing part of the Xperia 1 VIII launch. Ironically, the phone itself is still receiving fairly positive reactions for its hardware and camera-focused approach.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Sony)

Xiaomi launches Mijia Refrigerator 400L French-style with 60-minute automatic ice-making

Xiaomi has launched a new smart refrigerator in China under its Mijia lineup. The new model is called the Mijia Refrigerator French 400L Automatic Ice Maker, and it is now open for reservations in China.

The biggest highlight is probably the automatic ice-making system. Xiaomi says the fridge can produce ice in about 60 minutes, which should be useful for households that regularly go through a lot of cold drinks or entertain guests often.

There is also a strong focus on hygiene. Xiaomi claims an antibacterial rate of over 99.9%, along with full-area ion purification to help reduce odors and keep food fresher for longer.

Inside, the refrigerator includes a 50L variable temperature compartment that can be adjusted between -1°C and 5°C. That gives a bit more flexibility depending on what you are storing, whether it is seafood, meat, vegetables, or drinks.

The total storage capacity is split into 216L for refrigeration, 50L for the adjustable zone, and 134L for the freezer section. Xiaomi says the layout is designed for families of around four to five people.

The fridge also supports Xiaomi’s HyperOS ecosystem, allowing remote controls and smart home integration. Other details include a quiet 35dB operating noise level and a 10-year compressor warranty.

Design-wise, Xiaomi is going with a softer look this time. The refrigerator comes in an apricot finish and uses a relatively slim body design that should fit more easily into compact kitchens. Xiaomi says it takes up around 0.4 square meters of floor space.

Pricing:

The refrigerator is priced at 2,999 yuan, though China’s national subsidy brings the effective price down to around 2,549 yuan, which puts it in a fairly competitive spot for a feature-heavy mid-range model.

With products like this, Xiaomi continues to push deeper into the smart appliance market beyond phones, wearables, and EVs.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source: Xiaomi Youpin | Via)

Best MagSafe Power Banks for iPhone in 2026: Anker vs Belkin vs Ugreen

If your iPhone battery is running low by lunchtime, or you are the kind of person who forgets to charge, you are not alone. Heavy app use, always-on displays, and the demands of 5G connectivity mean that even the latest iPhones can struggle through a full day. 

A MagSafe power bank is one of the smartest accessories you can have for this problem. It snaps onto the back of your iPhone magnetically, charges it wirelessly, and lets you keep using the phone normally while it tops up.

But the market is crowded. Walk into any electronics store or scroll through Amazon, and you will find dozens of options. So to make your decision easy, we are listing out the best MagSafe power banks for iPhone in 2026 from three of the most reliable brands: Anker, Belkin, and Ugreen. 

1. What Is MagSafe — and What Is Qi2?

Apple

Before jumping into the products, let’s quickly understand the terminology. 

MagSafe is Apple’s magnetic charging system, built into every iPhone from the iPhone 12 onwards. It uses a ring of magnets to snap accessories, including power banks, perfectly into place on the back of the phone. 

Meanwhile, Qi2 is an open standard based on MagSafe, developed by the Wireless Power Consortium. It brings the same magnetic alignment and 15W fast wireless charging to non-Apple devices and accessories. In 2026, Qi2 is the standard to look for on any magnetic power bank, because it guarantees genuine fast charging rather than the slower 7.5W you get from basic wireless chargers.

The newest generation, Qi2.2, pushes speeds even further to 25W, and one of the brands below has been the first to bring this to market.

2. Anker MagGo Power Bank

Anker has been the world’s number one mobile charging brand by retail sales for five consecutive years, and its MagSafe lineup reflects years of refinement.

3. Anker MagGo Power Bank (10K Slim)

Anker MagGo Power Bank (10K Slim)

The Anker MagGo Power Bank (10K Slim) is designed for people who want maximum power without adding bulk. At just 0.58 × 2.78 × 4.09 inches, this 10,000mAh power bank delivers exceptional portability without compromising on power.

It is Qi2-certified, meaning it delivers 15W wireless charging with fast, secure, and efficient power boosts. With 27W USB-C fast charging, an iPhone 15 can reach 60% in just 30 minutes while the power bank itself recharges simultaneously.

One of Anker’s biggest selling points is safety. The MagGo Power Bank is built with an ActiveShield safety system that continuously monitors temperatures over 3 million times daily, maintaining operating temperatures below 104°F. The industry standard, in comparison, is 118.4°F. 

The power bank also has a smart display showing battery percentage and estimated charging times, plus a built-in kickstand for hands-free viewing.

4. Anker Nano Power Bank (5K Slim)

Anker Nano Power Bank (5K Slim)

For those who want something even lighter, the Anker Nano Power Bank could be the one for you. It’s just 0.34 inches thick, weighs 4.3 ounces, and charges iPhones with 15W MagSafe-compatible wireless charging and supports 20W USB-C wired charging. The device recharges itself in under two hours and can charge an iPhone 16 Pro to 25% in 42 minutes.

As for the build, the power bank has a metal frame alongside a skin-friendly back panel. It also sports a USB-C port at the bottom, using which you can get up to 20W charging speeds over a wired connection, and it comes with a USB-C cable in the box.

5. Belkin BoostCharge Pro

Belkin is known for premium build quality and its tight relationship with the Apple ecosystem. Its BoostCharge Pro line is MFi-certified, meaning Apple has approved it to work with iPhones, and every model comes with Belkin’s impressive Connected Equipment Warranty.

6. Belkin BoostCharge Pro Magnetic Power Bank with Qi2 (5K and 10K)

Belkin BoostCharge Pro Magnetic Power Bank with Qi2 (5K and 10K)

Belkin offers the BoostCharge Pro with up to 15W of wireless charging, making it easy to attach to any iPhone with MagSafe support. The 10,000mAh model promises up to 35 hours of additional battery life for smartphones, and the company also offers thinner options with 8,000mAh and 5,000mAh, depending on your needs.

The built-in foldable kickstand lets users switch between pad and stand modes, making it convenient for FaceTime calls, streaming, or multitasking while charging. Weighing 5.3 ounces, the BoostCharge Pro is compact and travel-friendly. Belkin offers the device in multiple colors: Deep Purple, Teal, Pink, and Black, to suit different tastes.

In independent head-to-head recharge testing, the Belkin BoostCharge Pro Power Bank 5K + Stand won in recharging tests, recharging a faded iPhone 16 Pro by 79%, beating the 5K EcoFlow RAPID (70%) and the Ugreen 5,000mAh model (68%).

Every Belkin purchase also comes with a 2-year warranty and a $2,500 Connected Equipment Warranty. Belkin will repair or replace electronic devices damaged by an electrical charge while properly connected to this charger. This level of protection is almost unheard of among power bank manufacturers, making Belkin an easy recommendation for anyone who owns expensive devices.

The BoostCharge Pro is sustainably made with post-consumer recycled materials and comes in 100% plastic-free packaging.

7. Ugreen MagFlow 

Ugreen might be less of a household name than Anker or Belkin, but the company has been a reliable choice for anyone looking for charging accessories, including those of iPhones. 

8. Ugreen MagFlow (10,000mAh, Qi2.2)

Ugreen MagFlow (10,000mAh, Qi2.2)

The Ugreen MagFlow is the world’s first Qi2.2-certified power bank, delivering wireless charging speeds up to 25W.

During real-world testing, the MagFlow was able to charge an iPhone from 20% to 80% twice using Qi2 wireless charging, drawing on its 10,000mAh capacity. 

The MagFlow also features 30W USB-C fast charging with a built-in USB-C cable and a lanyard that helps carry the power bank around. In total, this power bank offers two USB-C wired connections, the built-in cable, and a separate port, in addition to wireless charging. With that, you can charge an iPhone 17 Pro Max, AirPods Pro 3, and Apple Watch Ultra on the go with just one extra cable.

It also has a real-time LED display that shows battery levels, and a 13-layer safety system protects against overheating and overcharging. The built-in cable also doubles as a strap.

The main trade-off with the Ugreen MagFlow is price. It sits at approximately a 20% premium over most alternatives, with a price tag of around $90. 

9. Head-to-Head Comparison

FeatureAnker MagGo Slim (10K)Belkin BoostCharge Pro (10K)Ugreen MagFlow (10K)
Capacity10,000mAh10,000mAh10,000mAh
Wireless Speed15W (Qi2)15W (Qi2)25W (Qi2.2)
Wired Output27W USB-C20W USB-C30W (built-in cable)
Built-in StandYesYesNo (has lanyard)
Smart DisplayYesLED indicatorsYes
Built-in CableNoNoYes
Safety Warranty24-month$2,500 CEWStandard
Best ForSlim carryReliability & designFastest charging
Approx. Price~$65–$80~$89–$99~$85–$95

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Galaxy Tab S12 series could use MediaTek’s Dimensity 9500

Samsung may once again rely on MediaTek for its next flagship tablets. A new report from Android Authority claims references to the Dimensity 9500 have been spotted inside Samsung’s AI Core application, hinting at what could power the upcoming Galaxy Tab S12 lineup.

The chipset appears in the code under model number MT6993, which corresponds to MediaTek’s flagship Dimensity 9500 platform. The code itself does not directly mention the Galaxy Tab S12 series, but based on Samsung’s recent tablet strategy, it is the most likely candidate.

Samsung already shifted away from Qualcomm for some of its premium tablets in recent years. The Galaxy Tab S10 and Tab S11 series used high-end Dimensity chips instead of Snapdragon processors, so the move would not be surprising this time either.

The Dimensity 9500 is built on TSMC’s 3nm process and focuses heavily on AI and power efficiency. It uses an all-big-core CPU setup along with MediaTek’s latest Mali GPU, which should help with gaming and multitasking on larger-screen devices like tablets.

Interestingly, the leak comes from Samsung’s own AI software. The AI Core app reportedly references several on-device AI features expected for the Tab S12 lineup, including AI-generated wallpapers, generative image editing, image expansion, and something called Image Harmonization. That last feature is said to intelligently adjust lighting and colors when placing subjects into different backgrounds, making edits look more natural.

The broader pattern here is Samsung pushing more AI processing directly onto the device instead of relying entirely on cloud servers. That usually means faster performance, lower latency, and fewer privacy concerns since some tasks no longer need internet access.

The Galaxy Tab S12 series is expected to launch later this year, likely around the usual September timeframe. Models like the Tab S12+ and Tab S12 Ultra are expected to return, though full specs are still mostly under wraps.

If this leak turns out to be accurate, Samsung’s next flagship tablets could end up focusing just as much on AI performance as raw hardware power.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source)

Xiaomi’s first Clip-on Earphones tipped with 11mm drivers, LHDC 5.0 and Hi-Res audio

Xiaomi is getting ready to enter the growing open-ear audio segment with its first pair of clip-on wireless earbuds. The company has now officially shared early details ahead of the launch later this month, and the focus seems to be on comfort, lightweight design, and smart features tied into Xiaomi’s ecosystem.

Each side weighs around 5.5 grams, which should make them fairly easy to wear for longer periods without the usual pressure inside the ear canal. Xiaomi says the structure uses memory titanium wire with a biomimetic curved shape to help keep the fit secure while staying comfortable.

Design is clearly a big part of the pitch here. The earbuds feature a glossy finish with what Xiaomi describes as a transparent sound-emitting sphere design and metallic textures around the outer shell. So far, the company has shown Satin Gold and Pearl White color options.

On the audio side, Xiaomi is using an 11mm driver with a metal-coated diaphragm. The earbuds also support LHDC 5.0 and Hi-Res audio certification, which should help with higher-quality wireless playback on supported devices.

Call quality seems to be another area Xiaomi is pushing. The earbuds include a three-microphone setup along with a VPU sensor and AI-based noise reduction. There is also a “reverse sound wave technology” meant to reduce audio leakage, which is usually one of the bigger issues with open-ear designs.

Xiaomi is also adding several AI-focused features, including real-time translation across 21 languages, voice recording, and automatic summaries. Some of those features will likely depend heavily on Xiaomi’s own ecosystem and Xiao AI support.

The company has not confirmed battery life or pricing yet, but the launch is expected sometime later this month. There is also a good chance these earbuds arrive alongside other Xiaomi products, including the Mi Band 10 Pro and Xiaomi 17 Max.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Source: Xiaomi (1), (2), (3)

Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro brings Apple ecosystem support with iPhone control and health sync

Xiaomi is preparing to launch its new wearable, the Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro, in China this month. And the company today confirmed that the tracker will have deeper integration with the Apple ecosystem. 

According to official information, the Smart Band 10 Pro will be compatible with both Apple Inc. devices and Xiaomi phones at the same time. This means users can wear the band while using an iPhone and still get real-time syncing of notifications for calls, text messages, and even WeChat. It also supports quick actions through iPhone shortcuts, including activating Do Not Disturb mode and enabling outdoor cycling tracking.

Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro Apple Ecosystem Support

The device goes beyond basic notification support. It can remotely control an iPhone for taking photos, managing music playback, and even helping users locate their phone. Health and fitness data, such as activity tracking, sleep patterns, and heart rate, can also be automatically synced to Apple Health.

Apart from this, the band will have integration with Xiaomi Auto to offer driving reminders, fatigue alerts, and navigation warnings if a route is missed. It also supports Xiaomi’s Home automation system, allowing users to control smart home devices directly from the wrist. NFC support is included as well, enabling transport cards, access cards, campus cards, and car key simulation, along with offline payments and Alipay “Tap to Pay” functionality.

Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro Specifications

In terms of design, the Smart Band 10 Pro is very lightweight at just 21.6 grams and only 9.7mm thick. It features an aluminum alloy body with a curved display and supports an optional Milanese strap. The device also offers up to 21 days of battery life, depending on usage.

According to previous reports, the Smart Band 10 Pro is said to feature a 1.74-inch AMOLED display and a 380mAh battery, which may last up to 25 days in light use conditions. The wearable has already been spotted in multiple color options, including black, silver, pink, and possibly white, orange, and a ceramic variant. In Brazil, pricing is expected to fall between $150 and $170.

The Smart Band 10 Pro will sit above the standard Smart Band 10 as Xiaomi’s more premium fitness band offering.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories! 💡

Oppo Find X9s price leaks for India, and its expensive than Find X9 with better chip

Oppo Find X9s is soon making its way to the Indian market, and a new leak has now revealed both the expected launch date and pricing details of the phone. Oppo announced the device in China back in April, and the company later confirmed that the device would also arrive in India.

Now, tipster Abhishek Yadav claims that the Oppo Find X9s will launch in India on 21 May 2026 with a price tag of Rs 79,999. The price is for the 12/256GB variant. 

Surprisingly, the standard Find X9 with almost similar hardware and a better processor is available in India for Rs 74,999. Know the difference between the two.

Oppo Find X9s Specifications

For the price, the Oppo Find X9s will bring a 6.59-inch FHD+ OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate. The panel is also supports up to 1,800 nits of high brightness mode and comes protected by Gorilla Glass 7i. All of this fits in a slim 7.99mm body while weighing around 202 grams.

Under the hood, the smartphone runs on MediaTek’s Dimensity 9500s chipset paired with LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.1 storage. For graphics, the device includes the Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU clocked at 1,612 MHz. The Find X9s is also expected to ship with Android 16 out of the box.

In the camera department, Oppo equips the phone with a triple 50MP rear camera setup. The primary sensor comes with OIS support and is paired with an ultrawide camera and a 3x periscope telephoto lens. On the front, the device features a 32MP selfie shooter.

Moreover, the Oppo Find X9s packs a large 7,025mAh battery with support for 80W wired fast charging.

Other expected features include an in-display fingerprint scanner, dual stereo speakers, NFC support, an X-axis linear motor, Bluetooth 6.1, and Wi-Fi 7 compatibility. The smartphone is also tipped to carry IP68 and IP69 ratings for dust and water resistance.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories! 💡

(Source)

iQOO Pad6 Pro supports native 4K gaming in 13 titles on its 4K display

iQOO is starting to reveal more details about the upcoming iQOO Pad6 Pro, and the company is putting a heavy focus on gaming performance ahead of the tablet’s May 20 launch in China.

One of the biggest claims so far is support for 13 native 4K games, which is still relatively uncommon on Android tablets. According to iQOO, some shooting games can run at up to 4K resolution and 144fps in the company’s Monster+ mode, while certain open-world titles support up to 2.7K at 120fps. As always, actual gameplay performance will likely vary depending on the title, but the specs are clearly aimed at mobile gamers who want something beyond standard tablet gaming.

The display itself also looks fairly impressive on paper. The Pad6 Pro features a large 13.2-inch 4K LCD panel with a 144Hz refresh rate, up to 1200 nits brightness, and Dolby Vision support. Between the high resolution and refresh rate alone, the tablet seems positioned somewhere between a gaming device and a portable media machine.

Powering the device is the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset paired with up to 16GB RAM and 512GB storage. iQOO is also highlighting a large internal cooling system to help sustain performance during longer gaming sessions. The company even claims AnTuTu scores exceeding 4.44 million points, although benchmark numbers do not always translate directly into real-world experience.

Battery life could end up being another major selling point here. The Pad6 Pro packs a massive 13,000mAh battery with support for 90W fast charging, which should at least help offset the power demands of a large high-refresh-rate 4K display. Audio also seems to be part of the package, with an 8-speaker setup designed for a more immersive gaming and media experience.

While the hardware shares a lot in common with the Vivo Pad6 Pro, iQOO appears to be marketing this version more aggressively toward gamers and performance-focused users. The tablet will reportedly launch in color options including Crystal Gray and Silver Wing.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Sources: iQOO (1), (2), (3)

Samsung Galaxy M47 runs Geekbench with a Snapdragon chip, Android 16

Samsung is likely working on a new Galaxy M series phone. The upcoming Samsung Galaxy M47 has now surfaced on Geekbench, revealing key hardware details ahead of launch.

The Geekbench listing shows the phone carrying the model number SM-M476B. The benchmark confirms that the device will be powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset. 

Samsung Galaxy M47 Geekbench

The processor configuration includes four performance cores clocked at 2.40GHz and four efficiency cores running at 1.80GHz. Graphics duties are handled by the Adreno 710 GPU.

The listing also reveals that the Galaxy M47 in testing has 8GB of RAM and Android 16 out of the box. In the GPU benchmark, the handset managed an OpenCL score of 2,256, giving an early look at its graphics performance.

Samsung Galaxy M47: What we know so far

This is not the first time the Galaxy M47 has appeared online. An earlier report suggests Samsung had already started internal testing of the device in markets such as India and Nepal. The smartphone had also previously surfaced in the IMEI database, which hinted that development was already underway.

The Galaxy M47 is expected to arrive as the successor to the Samsung Galaxy M44, which debuted in late 2023. Compared to the older model, the new device is likely to bring upgrades in processing power and software support.

Galaxy M44

While Samsung has not officially confirmed the specifications yet, reports suggest the Galaxy M47 could feature a Super AMOLED display, 5G connectivity, and a large battery capacity. 

There are also indications that Samsung may slightly change the positioning of its Galaxy M and Galaxy F series this year. Another upcoming handset, believed to be called the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro, could share similarities with the Galaxy M47.

The Galaxy M47 will succeed the Galaxy M44, which features a 6.58-inch full-HD+ LCD, a 50-megapixel triple rear camera setup, an 8-megapixel selfie camera, and a 5,000mAh battery. With the Galaxy M47 now appearing on Geekbench, more details about Samsung’s next mid-range phone could surface in the coming weeks.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories! 💡

(Via)

iQOO 15T confirmed to pack 8,000mAh battery with 100W charging, 200MP camera

On May 20, iQOO will take the wraps off the iQOO 15T, a performance-focused flagship phone in China. With only a few days remaining until launch, the brand has been steadily confirming key details about the device. Earlier this week, it revealed the display specifications, and now it has confirmed the battery size, charging capabilities, and primary camera details.

iQOO 15T’s battery, charging, and camera details confirmed

The iQOO 15T is equipped with the largest battery in the flagship lineup — an ultra-slim 8,000mAh battery paired with 100W fast charging. It supports Global Direct Drive Power Supply 2.0, which helps reduce heat while gaming and charging simultaneously. The durable high-capacity single-cell battery is designed to deliver all-day battery life, from morning classes to bedtime.

Moving on to the optics, the iQOO 15T will, for the first time on an iQOO flagship phone, feature a 200-megapixel large-sensor super main camera capable of delivering highly detailed shots even when zooming in. It also supports the same CIPA 4.5 professional-grade stabilisation found on Vivo’s imaging flagship phones, along with 4x lossless zoom for clearer shots at both short and long distances. Other features include full focal-length portrait photography and AI-powered imaging tools.

Recent reports have revealed that the iQOO 15T will feature a 50-megapixel ultra-wide lens alongside the primary camera, as well as a 16-megapixel front-facing camera. The device will ship with OriginOS 6-based Android 16.

On the front, the iQOO 15T will feature a 6.82-inch 2K flat display with support for a 144Hz refresh rate. Under the hood, it will be powered by the Dimensity 9500 Monster Edition chipset for improved gaming performance. The inclusion of the self-developed Q3 e-sports chip will enable full-scene ray tracing, super 2K resolution, and 2K + 144fps gaming in select titles. At present, there is no clarity on whether the iQOO 15T will launch in markets outside China.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories! 💡

OnePlus Nord 6 vs Poco F8 Pro Full Comparison: Which Phone Gives More Value for Money?

OnePlus Nord 6 and Poco F8 Pro take two very different approaches to the flagship killer formula. One focuses on massive battery life and ultra-smooth gaming, while the other pushes premium performance, cameras, and flagship-level refinement. With both phones offering powerful Snapdragon chips, advanced AMOLED displays, and aggressive pricing, this comparison breaks down which device actually delivers the better overall experience for the money. 

Major Features:

FeatureOnePlus Nord 6Poco F8 ProWinner
BuildPlastic frame, plastic back, Crystal GuardAluminum frame, glass back, Gorilla Glass 7iPoco – More premium materials and flagship feel
Water ResistanceIP68/IP69K + MIL-STD-810HIP68OnePlus – Better durability and protection
Display6.78-inch AMOLED, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3600 nits6.59-inch AMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, 3500 nitsOnePlus – Higher refresh rate and brighter panel
ChipsetSnapdragon 8s Gen 4Snapdragon 8 ElitePoco – Significantly more powerful flagship chipset
GPUAdreno 825Adreno 830Poco – Better graphics performance
RAM & StorageUp to 512GB + 12GB RAMUp to 512GB + 12GB RAMTie – Similar storage and memory options
Main Camera50MP + 8MP ultrawide50MP + 50MP telephoto + 8MP ultrawidePoco – More versatile triple-camera setup
Video Recording4K 60fps8K 30fpsPoco – Higher-end video capabilities
Selfie Camera32MP with 4K video20MP with 1080p videoOnePlus – Sharper selfies and better front video
SpeakersStereo speakersStereo speakers with Dolby Atmos, Bose tuningPoco – Better multimedia audio setup
BluetoothBluetooth 6.0Bluetooth 5.4OnePlus – Newer Bluetooth standard
Fingerprint SensorOptical in-displayUltrasonic in-displayPoco – Faster and more premium sensor
Battery7500mAh Global / 9000mAh India6210mAhOnePlus – Massive battery advantage
Charging80W wired100W wiredPoco – Faster charging speeds
Reverse Charging6.5W / 27W India22.5WPoco – Better reverse charging output
SoftwareAndroid 16, OxygenOS 16Android 16, HyperOS 3Tie – Both ship with latest Android
PriceApprox ₹39,000 / $460Approx ₹52,000 / $600OnePlus – Much stronger value for money
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.

1. Design and Display

Build and Feel

The OnePlus Nord 6 focuses on durability and practicality with IP68/IP69K protection and MIL-STD-810H certification. Its plastic frame and back help keep the device comfortable during extended gaming or media sessions, though it does not feel as premium in hand. The Poco F8 Pro clearly targets a more flagship-style experience with its aluminum frame, glass back, and Gorilla Glass 7i protection. It feels more polished and refined, especially for users who care about premium materials.

Display Quality

OnePlus pushes harder on refresh rate and brightness with a 165Hz AMOLED panel and impressive peak brightness levels. Animations feel extremely smooth, and gaming responsiveness stands out immediately. Poco counters with Dolby Vision support, richer color depth, and a more balanced flagship-grade viewing experience. While the lower 120Hz refresh rate is noticeable on paper, the overall display tuning feels more cinematic and polished for streaming content.

Verdict

Poco F8 Pro feels more premium overall, while the OnePlus Nord 6 delivers a more aggressive gaming-focused display experience. Users prioritizing smoothness and durability may lean toward OnePlus, but Poco offers the more flagship-like finish.

2. Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Poco F8 Pro takes a clear lead in raw performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and Adreno 830 GPU. Heavy gaming, multitasking, and AI-based processing feel effortless, placing it closer to ultra-premium Android flagships. The OnePlus Nord 6 still performs extremely well with the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, offering smooth real-world usage and efficient thermal handling. It feels optimized for long gaming sessions rather than chasing benchmark numbers.

Battery and Charging

Battery life becomes the Nord 6’s biggest strength, especially with the massive 9000mAh India variant. It can comfortably stretch into two days for moderate users, something very few performance-focused phones can manage. The 80W charging is slower than Poco’s 100W system, but endurance matters more for many buyers. Poco charges significantly faster and still provides reliable all-day usage, though its smaller battery may feel less future-proof for power users.

Verdict

Poco F8 Pro wins outright for flagship-level performance, but the OnePlus Nord 6 stands out with unmatched battery endurance. The choice depends on whether raw power or long-lasting usage matters more.

3. Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Poco F8 Pro delivers a more versatile camera setup with a dedicated 50MP telephoto lens, allowing cleaner portrait shots and better zoom quality. Its larger primary sensor also helps in low-light photography, producing more detailed and balanced images. Video recording is another major advantage, especially with 8K support and stronger slow-motion capabilities. The OnePlus Nord 6 keeps things simpler with a dual-camera setup focused on reliability rather than flexibility. Daylight shots remain sharp and vibrant, and the color tuning feels consistent across most conditions.

Selfie Camera

OnePlus gains an edge for selfie users with its 32MP front camera and 4K recording support. The sharper output and autofocus support help during video calls and social media recording. Poco’s 20MP front camera performs adequately but feels less impressive considering the price difference.

Verdict

Poco F8 Pro offers a stronger rear camera system and more professional versatility, while the OnePlus Nord 6 quietly becomes the better option for selfie-focused users and casual content creators.

4. Pricing

The OnePlus Nord 6 is priced at around ₹39,000, while the Poco F8 Pro reaches roughly ₹52,000. That gap changes the entire comparison because both devices target performance-focused buyers but approach value differently. OnePlus delivers flagship-grade gaming performance, a massive battery, advanced durability ratings, and a high-refresh-rate AMOLED display at a much lower price point. It feels aggressively positioned for buyers wanting maximum hardware without crossing premium flagship territory.

The Poco F8 Pro justifies its higher price through a better chipset, premium materials, stronger cameras, faster charging, and flagship-style finishing touches. It feels closer to ultra-premium Android devices rather than a typical value flagship. Buyers paying extra are clearly getting meaningful upgrades rather than small cosmetic improvements.

Verdict

OnePlus Nord 6 offers stronger value for money overall, especially for gamers and battery-focused users. Poco F8 Pro justifies its premium pricing better for users wanting flagship cameras, build quality, and top-tier performance.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

5. Conclusion

The OnePlus Nord 6 stands out with its unusually massive battery, 165Hz AMOLED display, IP69K durability, and practical gaming-focused approach. It feels designed for buyers who want long endurance and consistently smooth performance without overspending. The Poco F8 Pro, meanwhile, pushes closer to flagship territory with the Snapdragon 8 Elite processor, premium glass-and-metal construction, telephoto camera, Dolby Vision support, and superior multimedia experience.

Both phones target power users, but their priorities are very different. OnePlus focuses on efficiency, endurance, and aggressive value, while Poco emphasizes flagship polish and maximum performance. That difference becomes noticeable in everyday usage rather than just specification sheets.

Verdict

OnePlus Nord 6 is the smarter value-driven choice for most buyers, especially gamers and heavy users who prioritize battery life. The Poco F8 Pro feels more complete and premium overall, making it the better option for users willing to spend extra for flagship-level refinement.

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More:

RedMagic Carbon Fiber Gaming Mouse teased ahead of May 18 launch

RedMagic is preparing a fairly packed launch event on May 18, where the company is expected to introduce both the new RedMagic 11S Pro series and a lightweight carbon fiber gaming mouse aimed at esports users.

The event is scheduled for 15:00 in China, and the new mouse is already being teased with the slogan “Light as a Wing, Swift as the Wind.” From the teaser images released so far, the accessory appears to feature a semi-transparent shell combined with carbon fiber materials, giving it a lightweight but premium-looking design.

RedMagic has not officially confirmed the polling rate yet. However, the older RedMagic 1S Wireless Gaming Mouse from 2024 supported up to 8000Hz polling in wired mode and 4000Hz wirelessly over 2.4G mode. Given that this is a successor launching nearly two years later, similar or improved polling performance would not be surprising.

Details like the exact weight, sensor model, battery size, and pricing are also unknown for now. Still, the company clearly seems to be targeting the higher-end wireless gaming mouse segment rather than casual users.

Unlike the mouse, the company has already shared quite a bit about the RedMagic 11S Pro lineup. The devices are powered by the overclocked Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 “Leading Version” chip, capable of pushing the prime core up to 4.74GHz. The RedMagic 11S Pro+ was even spotted on Geekbench as the first Android phone to cross the 4000-point mark in single-core performance.

Other expected features include a massive 8000mAh battery for extended gaming sessions, a large 6.85-inch 2K AMOLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate, shoulder triggers for gaming, and a “transparent-style” rear design with visible active cooling hardware underneath.

The paired launch of a gaming phone and gaming mouse also reflects RedMagic’s broader push beyond smartphones. Over the past few years, the company has gradually expanded into a wider gaming ecosystem that now includes monitors, cooling accessories, keyboards, and other PC peripherals. The May 18 event looks like another step in that direction.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source: RedMagic)

Motorola Edge 70 Pro vs Poco F8 Pro: One Offers Better Value for Money

Motorola Edge 70 Pro and Poco F8 Pro take two very different approaches to the premium smartphone segment. One focuses on balanced flagship features with strong cameras and battery life, while the other pushes raw performance and gaming power to the next level. With both devices offering high-end displays, fast charging, and premium designs, choosing the right one becomes far more interesting than expected. 

Major Features:

FeatureMotorola Edge 70 ProPoco F8 ProWinner
BuildGorilla Glass 7i front, plastic frame, eco leather backGorilla Glass 7i front, aluminum frame, glass backPoco – More premium frame and glass build
DurabilityIP68/IP69 + MIL-STD-810HIP68Motorola – Better durability protection
Display6.78-inch AMOLED, 144Hz, 5200 nits peak6.59-inch AMOLED, 120Hz, 3500 nits peakMotorola – Smoother refresh rate and brighter panel
HDR SupportHDRDolby Vision, HDR10+Poco – Better multimedia support
ChipsetDimensity 8500 ExtremeSnapdragon 8 ElitePoco – Far stronger flagship performance
GPUMali-G720 MC8Adreno 830Poco – Better gaming power
Storage TypeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1Tie – Same storage standard
Main Camera50MP wide50MP wideTie – Similar primary resolution
Telephoto Camera50MP periscope, 3.5x zoom50MP telephoto, 2.5x zoomMotorola – Better zoom flexibility
Ultrawide Camera50MP ultrawide8MP ultrawideMotorola – Higher quality ultrawide sensor
Video Recording4K up to 120fps8K up to 30fpsPoco – Higher video recording capability
Selfie Camera50MP AF, 4K video20MP, 1080p videoMotorola – Better selfie hardware and video
SpeakersStereo speakers with Dolby AtmosStereo speakers with Dolby Atmos, tuned by BosePoco – Added Bose tuning
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7Tie – Same connectivity level
Fingerprint SensorOptical in-displayUltrasonic in-displayPoco – Faster and more premium sensor
Battery6500mAh6210mAhMotorola – Larger battery capacity
Charging90W wired, wireless, reverse wireless100W wired, reverse wiredMotorola – More versatile charging features
SoftwareAndroid 16, 3 upgradesAndroid 16, HyperOS 3Tie – Both run latest Android
Price₹39,000 / $400₹52,000 / $600Motorola – Better overall value
OverallBalanced flagship experiencePerformance-focused flagshipMotorola – Better value for most users
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.

1. Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Motorola Edge 70 Pro focuses on a slimmer and more comfortable in-hand experience with its eco-leather finish and curved design language. It feels cleaner and more premium during daily usage, especially for users who prefer lighter phones with a softer grip. The IP68/IP69 rating and MIL-STD durability also add an extra layer of confidence for long-term use. Meanwhile, the Poco F8 Pro takes a more flagship-style approach with an aluminum frame and glass back that feels denser and more solid. It looks sharper and more performance-oriented, though the glossy finish may not feel as practical during extended use.

Display Quality

Motorola pushes ahead with a 144Hz AMOLED panel and an impressive 5200 nits peak brightness, making animations feel extremely fluid. The Poco F8 Pro counters with Dolby Vision support, deeper HDR tuning, and richer color reproduction. The panel feels more cinematic, especially while streaming content. Motorola’s display appears more balanced for gaming and smooth scrolling, while Poco’s screen leans toward media enthusiasts.

Verdict

The Motorola Edge 70 Pro feels more refined and ergonomic for daily use, while the Poco F8 Pro delivers a more premium flagship-style presentation. Users focused on comfort and smoother visuals may prefer Motorola, whereas Poco feels better suited for entertainment-heavy usage.

2. Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Poco F8 Pro clearly dominates raw performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset paired with the Adreno 830 GPU. Heavy gaming, sustained multitasking, and demanding AI-driven tasks feel noticeably faster and more future-ready. It carries flagship-level power that comfortably sits above most upper mid-range devices. The Motorola Edge 70 Pro, powered by the Dimensity 8500 Extreme, still performs very well for everyday usage, gaming, and app handling. The optimization appears smoother than expected, and the thermal management feels more controlled during longer sessions.

Battery and Charging

Motorola offers a larger 6500mAh silicon-carbon battery that prioritizes endurance. It comfortably suits users who value all-day reliability without constantly monitoring battery percentage. Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging also add convenience, missing from many rivals. Poco answers with faster 100W charging that fills the battery incredibly quickly. The charging experience feels more flagship-like, especially for power users constantly on the move.

Verdict

The Poco F8 Pro is a stronger performance-focused smartphone and easily appeals to gamers and heavy users. However, the Motorola Edge 70 Pro creates a more balanced experience with longer battery endurance and extra charging flexibility, making it feel more practical for everyday buyers.

3. Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Motorola takes a surprisingly aggressive camera approach with three 50MP sensors, including a periscope telephoto lens and a high-resolution ultrawide camera. The consistency between lenses helps produce more uniform colors and detail across different focal lengths. Photos tend to look cleaner and slightly more natural, especially in daylight. The Poco F8 Pro still performs impressively with its Snapdragon-powered image processing and 8K video recording support. Its primary camera captures strong dynamic range and punchier colors, though the 8MP ultrawide sensor feels weaker compared to Motorola’s setup.

Motorola’s 3.5x periscope zoom also creates more flexibility for portraits and distant subjects. Poco’s camera system feels tuned more toward social-media-friendly output with vibrant contrast and sharper processing.

Selfie Camera

The 50MP autofocus selfie camera on the Motorola Edge 70 Pro comfortably outclasses Poco’s 20MP front sensor. Selfies look more detailed and better suited for video calls and content creation. The ability to record 4K selfie video also gives Motorola a noticeable advantage.

Verdict

The Motorola Edge 70 Pro delivers a more versatile and balanced camera experience overall. Poco performs strongly for video and vibrant processing, but Motorola feels more complete for photography enthusiasts and creators.

4. Pricing

The Motorola Edge 70 Pro is priced at around ₹39,000 ($400), while the Poco F8 Pro sits significantly higher at approximately ₹52,000 ($600). That price difference immediately changes the conversation because both phones target slightly different buyers despite overlapping in several premium features.

Motorola delivers a flagship-style display, strong cameras, massive battery, wireless charging, and premium durability at a noticeably lower price. It feels aggressively positioned for users wanting high-end features without entering ultra-premium territory. Poco justifies its higher price mainly through its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and stronger flagship-grade performance. For hardcore gamers and performance enthusiasts, the additional power may genuinely feel worth paying extra for.

However, the overall value proposition appears more balanced on Motorola’s side. The feature-to-price ratio feels extremely competitive, especially when considering the camera hardware and battery package included at this segment.

Verdict

The Poco F8 Pro justifies its premium mainly through performance. The Motorola Edge 70 Pro, however, delivers stronger overall value for money and feels like the smarter choice for most mainstream buyers.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

5. Conclusion

The Motorola Edge 70 Pro stands out through its balanced flagship experience. The combination of a slimmer eco-leather design, triple 50MP camera setup, periscope zoom lens, larger battery, wireless charging support, and smoother 144Hz display creates a phone that feels polished in multiple areas instead of focusing on only one strength. It feels designed for users wanting versatility without crossing flagship pricing limits.

The Poco F8 Pro focuses heavily on raw performance and premium multimedia capabilities. The Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, Dolby Vision display, 8K recording support, ultrasonic fingerprint scanner, and extremely fast charging make it feel more like a gaming and power-user device. The performance headroom is clearly ahead and gives the phone a stronger long-term processing capability.

Verdict

Poco F8 Pro is the stronger choice for buyers who want maximum flagship performance and top-tier gaming power, but for most users, the Motorola Edge 70 Pro offers far better value for money. It delivers a more balanced overall experience with better cameras, longer battery life, wireless charging, a smoother display, and premium features at a significantly lower price, making it the smarter buy overall. 

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More:

Is a teleconverter worth buying? vivo X300 Ultra Photography Kit Real-World Test

Although I already shared my hands-on experience with the photography kit in the vivo X300 Ultra review, the weather during those days was quite poor, so I didn’t manage to capture many sample shots. Recently, I decided to head out again—into the woods and down to the seaside—to see if I could truly uncover the potential of this kit. When something costs €600, you definitely wouldn’t dare buy it casually without doing your homework first. Hopefully, after reading this article, you’ll have a clearer idea of whether it’s worth the investment.

Unboxing

The first layer of the packaging is the X300 Ultra itself, while the second layer contains all the accessories from the vivo X300 Ultra photography kit.

Actually, the accessories are basically the same as those of the first generation. There’s a tripod collar ring and also a 67mm filter adapter ring. Aside from this new 200mm teleconverter lens, everything else can easily be purchased from the official website. If you really only want the 200mm lens, make sure you check the link here.

Grip Usage Experience

The overall design of the new photography kit is pretty similar to the one from the X200 Ultra, except that the color has changed from black to silver. Once all the accessories are attached to the phone, it really does look quite a bit like a professional camera, right?

The imaging grip allows you to customize the function of every button and dial. Among them, I recommend customizing this function for the Fn key, because if you want to use the teleconverter lens for street photography or birding, this is the only way to quickly activate teleconverter mode.

Speaking of street photography, the 200mm teleconverter is probably the more suitable choice. The 400mm one not only sees farther than you’d imagine, but also feels pretty awkward in the hand. Compared to the grip, I actually prefer holding onto the lens itself. But with the 200mm one, you can just hold the grip normally.

As for things like build quality or compatibility, I already talked about them in the X300 Ultra review, so I won’t repeat them here. Instead, let’s combine it with some photos and talk about the actual user experience.

Astrophotography

If you have a 400mm lens, I’m pretty sure you’ll be interested in the moon.

What do you think about this photo? Isn’t it hard to believe this was taken with a smartphone? Even though it was shot at 1600mm and definitely uses algorithms to enhance image quality, this is still the most natural-looking moon photo I’ve ever seen, with the least amount of obvious AI processing. You can see the craters on the surface, but without excessive sharpening. That’s the charm of an optical telephoto lens.

Maybe you haven’t realized what it means to shoot celestial objects without a tripod: the stabilization on this kit has reached to the next level. Out of the 9 photos I took, only one came out slightly blurry.

Even if you were holding a professional camera, you still wouldn’t be able to capture shots like this without a tripod. But aside from the moon, other celestial bodies are still too far away from Earth. If you really want to get into astrophotography, you’ll still need to buy more professional lenses.

Concert Photography

Ever since vivo started making teleconverter lenses, its phones have included a mode called “Stage”.

In this mode, exposure is lowered, shutter speed is shortened, contrast is increased, and AI enhances every detail of the subject. It’s hard to believe that from 20 meters away, you can clearly capture someone’s hair strands and even the texture of their face, but the X300 Ultra, combined with the teleconverter lens, really does achieve this.

Some people don’t really like AI-enhanced photos, and honestly, neither do I, but if you’re actually at a concert and don’t want to regret your photos after getting home, then I’d still recommend using Stage mode. The AI is basically just bringing back your wrinkles and hair details. I think that’s acceptable.

If you’re outdoors during the daytime, then Auto mode can also produce a very sharp photo. No AI, everything just looks natural.

Wildlife Photography

Wildlife photography has always been a category that demands a lot from photography equipment. But now, you only need to spend 3000 dollars to step into the world of wildlife photography. You just need to walk into the woods, attach the grip and teleconverter lens, and then you’re already a qualified birder.

Well, this combination really can take some very beautiful bird photos. Sharp, clear, and sometimes it can even capture what they’re eating. You should also remember that these were handheld shots. Being able to take photos like these without a tripod proves to some extent just how high the upper limit of the stabilization performance is.

Maybe you’re wondering how much the teleconverter lens improves image quality. Here’s a photo taken without the teleconverter lens. At first glance, it still looks quite clear, but compared to the one shot with the teleconverter attached, there’s still a pretty noticeable gap. Taking excellent wildlife photos also requires some skill, because animals are always moving, making them much harder to photograph than the moon or singers.


First of all, you need to be willing to press the shutter button. Smartphones are not like DSLRs; electronic shutters don’t have a lifespan. So you really need to take a lot of shots before getting a satisfying photo. Secondly, if you want to photograph birds in flight, you still need to mount it on a tripod. And remember to turn off stabilization, because that’s the only way to keep the bird inside your frame.

If I had to point out a weakness, I’d say autofocus. Right now, the X300 Ultra’s bird recognition isn’t very accurate. In about 1/4 of the bird photos, the focus wasn’t actually on the bird itself, which is why I emphasized earlier that you absolutely need to shoot more photos.

There are also two more issues that are neither big nor small. The first is that the higher the magnification, the more obvious the shaking around the edges of the video becomes. This is caused by electronic stabilization, so if you avoid zooming in too much, the issue becomes less noticeable.

The second is that a 400mm focal length is still a bit too short for bird photography. In-Sensor Zoom alone simply can’t save photos taken in low light. So this photography kit can only really serve as an entry-level setup for wildlife photographers. Once the X300 Ultra helps you discover the charm of wildlife photography, then you can move on to buying a dedicated camera and longer telephoto lenses.

Conclusion

I’ve already tested the teleconverter lenses in the three main scenarios they’re designed for: astrophotography, concert photography, and wildlife photography. Looking at the results, concert photography turns out to be the most suitable use case for this kit. vivo clearly understands that its strength lies in portrait shooting, so even in a dim concert venue, it handles capturing the moment remarkably well.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Honor Magic V5: One Clearly Offers More Value

Foldable phones are no longer competing in the same category, and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Honor Magic V5 comparison proves that perfectly. The Razr Ultra targets users who want a compact flip-style flagship with a stylish design, while the Magic V5 focuses on delivering a full-sized foldable experience built for multitasking and productivity. Despite their different form factors, both sit in the same ultra-premium price segment, making this an interesting battle between portability and power.

Major Features:

FeatureMotorola Razr Ultra 2026Honor Magic V5Winner
Form FactorFlip-style foldableBook-style foldableHonor – More versatile for productivity and multitasking
Build QualityAluminum frame, Gorilla Glass CeramicIP58/IP59 protection, stylus supportHonor – Better durability and extra functionality
Main Display7.0-inch LTPO AMOLED, 165Hz7.95-inch LTPO AMOLED, 120HzHonor – Bigger immersive screen experience
Cover Display4-inch LTPO AMOLED, 165Hz6.43-inch OLED, 120HzHonor – Feels like a normal flagship phone when folded
Brightness5000 nits peak5000 nits peakTie – Both are excellent outdoors
PerformanceSnapdragon 8 EliteSnapdragon 8 EliteTie – Flagship-level speed on both
RAM & Storage16GB + 512GBUp to 16GB + 1TBHonor – More storage options
SoftwareAndroid 16Android 15 with 7 upgradesHonor – Better long-term software support
Rear Cameras50MP + 50MP50MP + 64MP telephoto + 50MP ultrawideHonor – More versatile photography setup
Selfie Camera50MPDual 20MPMotorola – Sharper selfies and video calls
Video RecordingUp to 8K, 4K 120fps4K 60fpsMotorola – Better for creators and video enthusiasts
Battery5000mAh5820mAh / 6100mAhHonor – Significantly better endurance
Wired Charging68W66WMotorola – Slightly faster
Wireless Charging30W50WHonor – Faster wireless charging
ConnectivityWi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, IR blasterHonor – More advanced connectivity features
AudioStereo speakers with Dolby AtmosStereo speakers with Hi-Res audioTie – Both deliver premium audio
Approx Price$1500 / ₹143,000$1400 / ₹130,000Honor – Better value for the hardware offered
Overall WinnerPremium compact flip flagshipFull-featured foldable powerhouseHonor Magic V5 – More complete overall package
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.

1. Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 focuses on style, portability, and a premium flip-phone experience. Its aluminum frame, Gorilla Glass Ceramic protection, and compact foldable form make it feel modern and pocket-friendly. The external display is also highly functional, allowing quick app access without opening the phone. The design feels more lifestyle-oriented, especially for users who prioritize compactness and one-handed usability.

The Honor Magic V5 takes a different approach with a book-style foldable design that behaves more like a tablet when unfolded. It adds stronger water resistance, stylus support, and a more productivity-focused layout. The larger inner screen creates a more immersive experience for multitasking and media consumption. The thinner foldable profile also gives it a futuristic edge despite being a larger device overall.

Display Quality

Motorola offers a smoother 165Hz refresh rate on both screens along with Dolby Vision support, making animations and gaming feel extremely fluid. Honor counters with a significantly larger inner display and a more practical cover screen that feels closer to a standard flagship smartphone.

Verdict

The Razr Ultra feels more stylish and compact, while the Magic V5 feels more versatile and productivity-focused. Users wanting a futuristic flip experience may prefer Motorola, but Honor delivers the more complete foldable display setup overall.

2. Specifications Including Battery

Performance

Both phones use the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, so flagship-level speed is guaranteed on either device. The Razr Ultra feels slightly more aggressive with its higher clock speeds and 165Hz refresh rate, creating a very fast and fluid user experience. App launches, gaming, and multitasking feel extremely responsive. Motorola also ships the device with Android 16 out of the box, giving it a slight software freshness advantage.

The Honor Magic V5, however, feels more optimized for productivity. MagicOS is designed around large-screen multitasking, and the bigger foldable canvas helps when using multiple apps simultaneously. Honor also promises up to seven major Android updates, which gives it stronger long-term value.

Battery and Charging

Honor clearly leads in battery capacity with up to 6100mAh on the China model and faster 50W wireless charging. The Razr Ultra still performs impressively for a flip phone with its 5000mAh battery and 68W wired charging, which is unusually strong for this category.

Verdict

Motorola feels faster and more entertainment-focused, while Honor delivers better endurance and long-term practicality. Users prioritizing battery life and multitasking will likely lean toward the Magic V5.

3. Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Motorola Razr Ultra keeps things simple with a dual-camera setup featuring high-resolution wide and ultrawide sensors. Colors are expected to look vibrant thanks to Pantone validation, and the phone supports advanced video recording, including 8K and 4K at high frame rates. The camera system feels optimized for social media creators and quick content capture.

The Honor Magic V5 offers a more versatile flagship camera system with a triple-lens setup that includes a dedicated 64MP periscope telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom. This gives Honor a major advantage for portrait photography and long-range shots. The larger foldable design also helps with hands-free shooting and preview flexibility. While Motorola focuses on video features and vibrant output, Honor aims for a more balanced flagship photography experience overall.

Selfie Camera

Motorola’s 50MP selfie camera is significantly sharper on paper and should appeal more to users who prioritize selfies and video calls. Honor’s dual 20MP selfie cameras are more practical across both displays but less impressive in raw resolution.

Verdict

The Razr Ultra is stronger for selfies and high-end video recording, while the Magic V5 offers a more complete and flexible rear camera system. Photography enthusiasts may find Honor more capable overall.

4. Pricing

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is expected to cost around $1500 or ₹143,000, while the Honor Magic V5 is slightly cheaper at approximately $1400 or ₹130,000. Despite the lower price, Honor includes a larger foldable display, a bigger battery, stylus support, a telephoto camera, faster wireless charging, and longer software support.

Motorola’s pricing is mainly justified by its premium flip-phone engineering, compact foldable design, and extremely polished external display experience. It feels more fashionable and unique compared to traditional foldables. The phone also targets buyers who want flagship performance without carrying a large book-style foldable in their pocket.

Honor appears to offer stronger hardware value overall. The feature-to-price ratio feels more aggressive, especially considering the multitasking advantages and larger display. For buyers focused on specifications and long-term ownership, the Magic V5 may feel like the smarter investment.

Verdict

The Razr Ultra charges extra for style and compact innovation, while the Magic V5 delivers more hardware value for the money. Honor clearly wins on overall value.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

5. Conclusion

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 stands out because of its refined flip-phone form factor, powerful external display, 165Hz refresh rate, and flagship selfie capabilities. It feels like a luxury foldable designed for users who value portability, social media content creation, and stylish everyday usability. The compact design also makes it easier to carry compared to larger foldables.

The Honor Magic V5 focuses more on delivering a complete foldable flagship experience. Its larger inner display, periscope zoom camera, stylus support, larger battery, stronger durability certifications, and longer software support make it feel closer to a productivity powerhouse. The multitasking experience especially feels more practical for power users and professionals.

Verdict

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is the better choice for users wanting a premium flip-style foldable with standout design and entertainment features. The Honor Magic V5 is the stronger all-rounder with better battery life, camera versatility, productivity tools, and overall value. Buyers wanting the most complete foldable experience will likely find the Magic V5 more convincing overall.

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More;

HONOR 600 & 600 Pro Review: Premium? Flagships? Mid-rangers?

The HONOR Number series has occupied an interesting market position over the past few years. It’s not the kind of device where you feel compelled to buy the absolute top-end model, yet it’s equally difficult to point out any major shortcomings. As some users put it, it’s a “premium mid-range all-rounder with a distinct flagship flavor.”

I’ve been using the HONOR 600 and 600 Pro side by side for quite some time now. Honestly, they don’t feel like two completely different phones. Instead, they feel like two different concentrations of the same excellent foundation. One is “more than enough and highly capable,” while the other is “that, plus a few serious upgrades.” Let’s break them down together, so you can clearly see the difference between this regular cup and the large cup.

Design & Build

At first glance, the two phones look nearly identical. But if you look closely, the main physical difference is that the standard model lacks a telephoto lens. If you put the 600, the 600 Pro, and the iPhone 17 Pro side by side, and only look at the camera module… even Apple’s own designers would have to do a double-take. But jokes aside, the biggest design change on this generation of HONOR Number series isn’t the color — it’s the craftsmanship.

The build and finish are identical across both models. They feature a semi-transparent ultra-durable composite fiber back and a matte metal frame. The unit I have on hand is the White colorway. On this model, the texture of the semi-transparent back panel is at its most expressive. In low light, it resembles warm, polished jade. It resists smudges remarkably well, which is especially noticeable on this white finish. After a week of use, the back remains remarkably clean.

Both phones share the same display: a 6.57-inch AMOLED flat screen. And yes, it’s flat — a significant advantage for flat-screen enthusiasts — with extremely slim bezels. Combined with the largest corner radius of any Android device, the front-facing design projects a presence that easily punches above its mid-range class.

The physical dimensions are identical. The only difference is weight. That extra 10 grams in the Pro model is barely noticeable in the hand, but it’s the price you pay for that telephoto lens. In a sense, those 10 grams are the most valuable 10 grams on this entire phone. It’s also worth noting that IP68, IP69, and IP69K water and dust resistance are present on both devices. Whether you’re at the beach or caught in the rain, you won’t have to worry as long as you’re not intentionally submerging it. This level of protection remains rare at this price point.

Display

I’ll admit, I initially dismissed the “8000 nits HDR peak brightness” as marketing speak, reminiscent of the early “hundred-megapixel” craze.
But after using it, I stand corrected. The greatest value of this display isn’t that theoretical peak of 8000 nits — it’s the Sunlight Mode. You won’t notice it indoors, but under direct sunlight at noon, the screen automatically ramps up to another level. According to official data, at 20% APL, it can hit 4000 nits. The simple translation is: while other phones force you to shield the screen with your hand just to see what’s on it, you can continue to browse messages and use navigation without issue.

Both displays share identical specifications: a 120Hz refresh rate, 3840Hz ultra-high frequency PWM dimming, and 1.07 billion colors. After using both the standard and Pro models for a week in low-light nighttime conditions, I can confirm that eye strain is significantly reduced compared to certain flagships with low-frequency PWM dimming. For those who tend to scroll through their phones for a while after turning off the lights, this display offers a distinct, yet often overlooked, advantage.

System & AI

Both phones run MagicOS 10, based on Android 16, and both feature the dedicated AI Button. I find the logic behind this AI button quite clever. It’s not a “press and talk” voice assistant, but rather a contextual trigger. For example, when you’re viewing photos in the gallery, a long press of the AI button directly launches AI Image to Video 2.0 — select a few images, type a description, and generate a 3 to 8-second video. This feature is available on both the standard and Pro models, and the experience is identical.

These AI experiences are the same across both models. Where the gap truly opens is the underlying performance headroom.
The Pro model’s Snapdragon 8 Elite is significantly more powerful than the standard model’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 4. In practical AI terms, this means the Pro generates videos faster, handles multitasking more smoothly, and keeps more apps active in the background. You might not notice it in everyday casual use, but if you’re simultaneously running AI generation, navigation, and background music streaming, the Pro model’s composure becomes apparent.

Performance & Battery Life: Same 7000mAh, Different Ceilings

Both phones pack a 7000mAh battery. That’s an extraordinary number, made even more impressive by the fact that both maintain a 7.8mm thickness. In real-world testing, the standard 600 easily lasts two days on a single charge with light to moderate use. The Pro model, with its more powerful chipset and marginally higher power draw, still comfortably delivers a day and a half to two days of use.
On the charging front:

  • Both support 80W wired fast charging
  • The standard model supports 27W wired reverse charging
  • The Pro model adds 50W wireless charging
    This wireless charging capability has a real impact on usage habits. If you’re accustomed to simply placing your phone on a wireless charging pad, the Pro model will feel significantly more convenient. If that’s not part of your routine, the standard model is perfectly adequate.

Cameras

Earlier, I mentioned that the Pro model’s extra 10 grams over the standard version is the most valuable 10 grams on the entire device. This is why — the periscopic telephoto lens.

The main cameras on both phones are identical. Daytime, nighttime, and low-light shots are highly consistent between the two. The main camera, paired with the AI Night Engine, delivers a very high success rate, especially in low light — as long as you keep the phone reasonably steady, blur is rarely an issue.

But the moment you zoom to mid or long range, the difference becomes immediately apparent. The standard 600 relies on cropping from the main camera beyond roughly 3x, where quality begins to visibly degrade. The 600 Pro adds a 50MP periscopic telephoto lens with excellent stabilization, offering 3.5x optical zoom and up to 120x hybrid zoom.

Here’s a real-world example: from an overpass, I used the Pro model’s 10x zoom to capture the illuminated signage of a distant building. The detail was remarkably sharp — not at all what you’d expect from a mid-range device. So the camera summary is straightforward: the standard HONOR 600 has a very strong main camera, covering 90% of daily shooting scenarios. The HONOR 600 Pro offers the main camera plus a periscopic telephoto, covering 99% of scenarios, and adds a genuinely creative zoom range.

Conclusion

We’ve summarized the strengths of both phones for your reference.
The HONOR 600 series represents a very smart product strategy. It doesn’t cripple the standard version just to make the Pro model look “stronger.”What it trims is primarily the periscopic telephoto lens and wireless charging, with a slightly lower-tier chipset that remains perfectly adequate for most users. The HONOR 600 Pro builds on the standard version by adding: the periscopic telephoto lens, 50W wireless charging, the Snapdragon 8 Elite flagship core, and more responsive AI processing under heavy loads.

Pricing has already been announced for the EU market: the standard 600 is effectively €499.9 after voucher with screen insurance, while the Pro is priced at €799.9 bundled with a tablet or projector. The UK Pro model is priced at £899.99.

So which one should you pick? Go with the HONOR 600 if you prefer a flat display, put battery life above all else, want a dependable primary phone that’ll easily last two to three years without breaking the bank, and don’t rely heavily on telephoto photography.