Advertisement

Motorola Edge (2024) and Samsung Galaxy A35 are excellent mid-range options with compelling specs and premium experience. The former has a clear advantage in terms of performance, connectivity, and charging speed, while the latter isn’t without its perks. The Galaxy A35 edges out the Motorola Edge (2024) in three important aspects. To make the decision easier, here are four reasons to pick the Edge (2024) over the Galaxy A35 — plus three factors that might make you reconsider.

Motorola Edge (2024) vs Galaxy A35

4 reasons to choose Motorola Edge (2024) over Galaxy A35

1. Better build quality

Both smartphones have a nice, clean look, though there are many differences. The Motorola Edge (2024) has an eco-leather back, which provides a soft, premium touch experience and is easier to hold compared to the glass back on the Galaxy A35. The former also has better drop protection.

The Edge (2024) has an aluminum frame, which not only gives it a premium look and feel but also offers stronger durability than the plastic frame on the Galaxy A35. The device is also more water-friendly, thanks to IP68 rating (vs. IP67 on the Galaxy A35).

2. Smoother and brighter screen

Edge (2024) vs Galaxy A35 display

Both smartphones have the same-size AMOLED screen, but the Motorola phone has a curved screen, whereas the Samsung phone has a flatter one. The resolutions are almost the same. However, the Motorola phone’s screen refreshes more frequently and has a slightly higher peak brightness.

But there’s one thing Galaxy A35 is good at: screen protection. It has Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, which is tougher than Gorilla Glass 3 on the Galaxy A35.

3. More screen time and less charging time

While Motorola Edge (2024) and Galaxy A35 have the same 5,000mAh battery capacity, the former typically lasts about half an hour longer. The Edge (2024) also wins on the charging front. It supports 68W USB-C charging that takes about 40 minutes to reach 100%, whereas the Galaxy A35’s 25W charging takes about an hour and a half. That’s a significant difference if you care about the charging time.

The Motorola Edge (2024) also supports 15W wireless charging, which is lacking on the Galaxy A35. That’s another sweet advantage of getting this Motorola phone.

4. Strong connectivity

Both phones come with essential connectivity features, but the Motorola Edge (2024) has an edge with Wi-Fi 6E support. This adds a 6GHz band, reducing network congestion for faster speeds and lower latency.

Additionally, the Motorola Edge (2024) features a newer USB-C standard, allowing for faster data transfers. On the other hand, the Galaxy A35 brings a newer standard Bluetooth 5.3 connectivity, a slight upgrade over the Edge (2024) ’s Bluetooth 5.2.

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

3 reasons to choose Galaxy A35 over Motorola Edge (2024)

1. Excellent software support

Galaxy A35 software support

Software is one aspect where the Galaxy A35 completely crushes the Motorola Edge (2024). The brand promises four major OS updates and five years of security patches for this Samsung device. On the other hand, the Edge (2024) will only get two OS updates and three years of security patches.

Since both phones were released with Android 14 out of the box, Android 16 would be the last major upgrade for Motorola Edge (2024), whereas the Galaxy A35 will stay relevant for two more years.

2. Better camera quality

The Edge (2024) has a 50MP OIS-enabled primary camera on the back, paired with a 13MP ultrawide shooter (with a 120˚ field of view). The Galaxy A35 also has a 50MP primary camera with OIS, though the remaining sensors are different — one is an 8MP ultrawide camera with a 123˚ field of view and a 5MP macro shooter. For selfies, the Motorola phone has a 32MP sensor whereas the Galaxy device has a 13MP snapper.

The Samsung Galaxy A35 produces better colors and retains more detail than Edge (2024). It also does a better job in low-light conditions. The Motorola phone has a higher-resolution ultrawide camera with autofocus that doubles as a macro camera. The Galaxy A35’s ultrawide camera lacks autofocus, though. Overall, the Galaxy A35 comes at the top as far as the camera is concerned.

3. Performance

The Motorola Edge (2024) is powered by the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, and the Galaxy A35 has the Exynos 1380 at its core. The two devices have similar performance, but if I have to pick one, it would be the Galaxy A35. It has slightly better CPU and GPU performance. 

Take a look at the benchmark score below.

AnTuTu 10:

Edge (2024)Galaxy A35
AnTuTu score599,463604,826
CPU198,077195,605
GPU116,988130,895
Memory132,817124,201
UX151,580154,125

Geekbench 6:

Edge (2024)Galaxy A35
Single core8921,024
Multi core2,7642,940

3DMark:

Edge (2024)Galaxy A35
3DMark Extreme (High)797809
3DMark Extreme (Low)731805

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Motorola Edge (2024) vs Galaxy A35: spec sheet

Motorola Edge (2024)Galaxy A35 5G
Release dateJune 20, 2024March 15, 2024
Dimensions
Weight
159.6 x 72 x 8.1 mm
174 g
161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm
209 g
Display6.6″ P-OLED
1080 x 2400 pixels resolution
144Hz refresh rate, 1300nits (peak)
6.6″ Super AMOLED
1080 x 2340 pixels resolution
120Hz refresh rate, 1000nits (peak)
ProcessorSnapdragon 7s Gen 2Exynos 1380
SoftwareAndroid 14
2 OS upgrades
Android 14
4 OS upgrades
Rear camera50MP (primary) – f/1.8, PDAF, OIS
13MP (ultrawide) – f/2.2, 120° FOV
video:
50MP (primary) – f/1.8, PDAF, OIS
8MP (ultrawide) – f/2.2, 123° FOV
5MP (macro) – f/2.4
video:
Front camera32MP – f/2.4
video:
16MP – f/2.2
video:
Battery
Charging
5,000mAh
68W (wired)
15W (wireless)
5,000mAh
25W (wired)
ConnectivityWi-Fi 6e
Bluetooth 5.2
USB Type-C 3.1
Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth 5.3
USB Type-C 2.0
MiscStereo speakers
under-display fingerprint scanner
Stereo speakers
under-display fingerprint scanner

Popular phone comparisons:
1. Motorola Edge (2024) vs Moto G Stylus 5g (2024)
2. Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs Moto G Power 5G (2024)

Comments