Samsung may be stepping back from the ultra-thin smartphone trend sooner than expected. According to recent reports, the company has halted development of a follow-up to the Galaxy S25 Edge. The reason is said to be weak sales and limited consumer interest in the ultra-thin design.
Earlier rumors suggested Samsung was considering replacing the Galaxy S26+ with a refreshed Edge model in 2026. Those plans later shifted to a more cautious wait-and-see approach. Now, sources indicate the project has been scrapped altogether.
The Galaxy S25 Edge focused heavily on achieving an ultra-slim profile. That design choice came with major trade-offs. Battery life from the 3,900mAh unit drew criticism for falling short in day-to-day use.
Another compromise of the slim design is camera versatility. The S25 Edge lacks a telephoto lens, while the iPhone Air only manages to pack a single rear sensor. Taken together, additional lenses, full-day battery life, and better heat dissipation appear to matter more to buyers than an ultra-slim and lightweight design.
According to a report from October, Apple scaled back production of the iPhone Air by one million units. With no strong push from its main rival, Samsung may see little reason to invest further in a niche category with limited demand.
While a larger battery was said to be under consideration for a next-generation Edge model, it remains unclear whether that would have been enough to offer full-day battery life and change buyer sentiment. For now, Samsung is expected to focus on more balanced flagship designs.
The situation points to a broader industry shift. While ultra-thin phones attract attention, consumers continue to prioritize battery life, performance, and overall usability. If current trends hold, 2026 could mark a pause—or an end—to the ultra-thin flagship experiment for both Samsung and Apple.
Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
(Source)
Comments