Oppo has officially confirmed that it will unveil the Find X7 series of smartphones at 2:30 pm (local time) on Jan. 8, 2024, in China. In addition, the Find X7 and Find X7 Ultra smartphones are now listed on Oppo China’s online store for reservations. The official listings have confirmed the configurations and color options of both smartphones well ahead of the official announcement.
Oppo Find X7 series launch date
Oppo Find X7
Reports have revealed that the Find X7 will come equipped with the Dimensity 9300 chipset. The official listing reveals that it will come in four configurations, such as 12 GB RAM + 256 GB storage, 16 GB RAM + 256 GB storage, 16 GB RAM + 512 GB storage, and 16 GB RAM + 1 TB storage.
The Find X7 will be available in four shades, such as Starry Sky Black, Sea and Sky, Desert Moon Silver, and Smokey Purple.
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
The Find X7 Ultra is expected to come equipped with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SoC. It will be available in three variants, such as 12 GB RAM + 256 GB storage, 16 GB RAM + 256 GB storage, and 16 GB RAM + 512 GB storage.
Find X7 Ultra: Pine Shadow InkFind X7 Ultra: Sea and SkyFind X7 Ultra: Desert Moon Silver.
When it comes to color options, the Find X7 Ultra will come in choices such as Pine Shadow Ink, Sea and Sky, and Desert Moon Silver.
The Find X7 and Find X7 Ultra have a similar design, with the front featuring a punch-hole display with curved edges and a dual-tone back panel with a massive camera module. The Find X7 has a triple-camera unit, whereas the Find X7 Ultra has a quad-camera system. The Ultra variant will be the world’s first smartphone to feature dual periscope telephoto cameras. In addition, it will also be the first-ever phone to feature the one-inch Sony LYT-900 50-megapixel camera sensor as the primary snapper.
It is said that there will be a third device called the Oppo Find X7 Ultra Satellite Communication Version, which will come with support for two-way satellite communication. The rest of its specs will be identical to the Find X7 Ultra.
Google offers different types of wearables for users with different needs, and the Fitbit Edge and Pixel Watch 3 are good examples. Although both devices combine fitness tracking with health-monitoring capabilities, they serve different purposes. The Fitbit Edge is a dedicated fitness tracker focused on activity monitoring, health insights and extended battery life. The Pixel Watch 3, on the other hand, is a full-fledged smartwatch that combines Fitbit fitness features with Wear OS applications, communication tools and Google services. Here is how the two Google wearables compare.
Design & Build
The Google Fitbit Edge features a slim rectangular design with a 1.34-inch display, a 100% recycled aluminium case and a silicone band. Weighing just 17.7g without the band, it is designed for lightweight, all-day wear, including during sleep and workouts. The Pixel Watch 3 takes a more traditional smartwatch approach with a circular design, an aluminium frame and Gorilla Glass 5 protection. Its 45mm version weighs 37g without the band, making it noticeably heavier than the Edge. Both devices offer 5ATM water resistance and IP68 protection, making them suitable for everyday activities and workouts.
Key Difference: The Fitbit Edge prioritises lightweight comfort and fitness tracking, while the Pixel Watch 3 offers a conventional smartwatch design.
Display
The Fitbit Edge features a 1.34-inch Hybrid OLED colour display with always-on functionality and adjustable brightness. Its rectangular screen provides quick access to workout statistics, health information and everyday activity data. The Pixel Watch 3 features a 1.4-inch circular LTPO AMOLED display with a resolution of 456 × 456 pixels, approximately 320ppi and peak brightness of 2,000 nits. It also supports an adaptive refresh rate of 1–60Hz. The Pixel Watch 3 provides a more detailed viewing experience for notifications, maps and applications, whereas the Edge focuses on making fitness information easy to read at a glance.
Key Difference: The Pixel Watch 3 has a higher-resolution, brighter display with adaptive refresh technology, while the Edge offers a larger viewing area than previous Fitbit trackers.
Battery Life
Battery life is one of the biggest differences between these devices. The Fitbit Edge features a 65mAh rechargeable battery rated for up to seven days of usage. It supports magnetic charging, with a full charge taking approximately 90 minutes. A five-minute charge can also provide up to one day of battery life. The Pixel Watch 3 45mm comes with a considerably larger 420mAh battery but offers up to 24 hours of usage with the always-on display enabled and up to 36 hours in Battery Saver mode. Its larger display and full smartwatch operating system mean users will need to charge it considerably more frequently.
Key Difference: The Fitbit Edge is designed for extended battery endurance, while the Pixel Watch 3 prioritises a broader smartwatch experience at the cost of battery life.
Health Tracking
Both devices offer extensive health-monitoring capabilities, including continuous heart-rate tracking, blood oxygen monitoring, ECG functionality, skin temperature tracking and sleep monitoring. However, their approaches to health insights differ. The Fitbit Edge includes Google Health Guardian features that monitor blood pressure and insulin resistance trends, alongside high and low heart-rate alerts. It also tracks HRV, sleep patterns and menstrual cycles. The Pixel Watch 3 combines Fitbit health tracking with additional sensors, including an electrical skin conductance sensor for body-response tracking. Both offer comprehensive health information, although the Edge places particular emphasis on dedicated wellness monitoring and long-term health trends.
Key Difference: The Edge focuses on additional wellness trends and dedicated health insights, while the Pixel Watch 3 combines health monitoring with a broader range of smartwatch sensors.
GPS & Navigation
Both wearables feature built-in GPS, allowing users to track outdoor workouts without carrying a smartphone. The Fitbit Edge supports GPS and Galileo, with Google’s precision GPS technology offering up to 40% improved tracking accuracy compared with previous Fitbit trackers. It also includes an altimeter for measuring elevation changes during outdoor activities. The Pixel Watch 3 supports GPS, GLONASS and Galileo, with additional satellite systems available in supported regions. More importantly, it offers Google Maps navigation directly from the wrist, making it useful for following directions while walking, running or exploring unfamiliar places.
Key Difference: Both support standalone GPS tracking, but the Pixel Watch 3 offers a more comprehensive navigation experience.
Sports & Training Features
The Fitbit Edge is built around dedicated fitness tracking, supporting more than 50 exercise modes and automatic recognition of up to 100 workouts. It tracks workout metrics, pace, elevation, VO2 Max, Active Zone Minutes, Cardio Load and Readiness Score. The Pixel Watch 3 offers more specialised running tools, including custom workouts, interval training, pace guidance and running-form measurements such as cadence, stride length, vertical oscillation and ground contact time. Both can support regular exercise routines, but their strengths differ. The Edge focuses on broad fitness monitoring, while the Pixel Watch 3 provides more detailed running analysis.
Key Difference: The Edge focuses on everyday fitness and activity tracking, whereas the Pixel Watch 3 offers more specialised running analysis and training tools.
Smart Features
The Pixel Watch 3 has a significant advantage in traditional smartwatch functionality. Running Wear OS 5, it supports Google services and a wider application ecosystem, including Google Wallet, Google Maps, Google Assistant and smartphone notifications. Its built-in microphone and speaker also allow users to handle calls and voice interactions. The Fitbit Edge offers a simpler experience with call and message notifications, quick replies, media controls, alarms, timers and Google Maps. It also supports customisable watch faces and interchangeable bands. While the Edge provides useful everyday conveniences, it does not offer the same full Wear OS experience as the Pixel Watch 3.
Key Difference: The Pixel Watch 3 offers a full smartwatch operating system and broader app support, while the Edge focuses on essential everyday features.
Outdoor Features
Both devices offer features for outdoor activities, including GPS tracking, elevation monitoring and 5ATM water resistance with IP68 protection. The Fitbit Edge combines its lightweight construction with built-in GPS and an altimeter, making it suitable for running, walking, hiking and other fitness activities. Its longer battery life is also useful for people who regularly track outdoor workouts. The Pixel Watch 3 adds a compass, barometer, altimeter and broader satellite positioning support. Combined with Google Maps, these features make it a more versatile companion for outdoor navigation and location-based activities.
Key Difference: The Edge is better suited to lightweight outdoor fitness tracking, while the Pixel Watch 3 offers additional navigation and environmental sensors.
Which One Should You Buy?
Choosing between these Google wearables depends on what you expect from a wrist-worn device. The Fitbit Edge is suitable for people who primarily want to monitor their fitness, sleep, recovery and overall health without charging their wearable every day. Its lightweight design, seven-day battery life and dedicated health features make it a practical everyday fitness companion. The Pixel Watch 3 is better suited to people who want a traditional smartwatch with fitness tracking as an additional capability. Its Wear OS platform, Google services, communication features and advanced running tools make it more versatile for everyday use.
Choose the Fitbit Edge for: Dedicated fitness tracking, lightweight comfort, extended battery life and health-focused monitoring.
Choose the Pixel Watch 3 for: Smartwatch applications, smartphone integration, calls, navigation and advanced running features.
Google Fitbit Edge vs Google Pixel Watch 3: Major Differences
Oppo, Vivo, Xiaomi, and Honor have introduced Android Developer Verification (ADV) in mainland China. The Mobile Intelligent Terminal Ecosystem Alliance announced the move today, saying the four brands will recognize each other’s verification results. That is, developers who complete the process on one platform will not have to repeat it when distributing apps on the other three.
The system is intended to make it easier to identify developers behind apps installed outside official app stores. According to the alliance, China lacks a unified real-name verification system for sideloaded apps, making it difficult to trace malicious, counterfeit, and fraudulent software back to its developers. Such apps can expose users to financial scams, private data leaks, and unwanted purchases.
ADV links each developer’s verified identity to their apps. However, the change should have little effect on people who download apps through official stores. Apps already registered and listed on the four platforms go through verification automatically, so their developers do not need to submit another application.
The difference will become more noticeable when installing APK files from outside those stores. If an app comes from a developer who has not completed identity verification, users will see an “unverified” warning on phones from the four brands. They must confirm the installation manually before proceeding. The alliance acknowledges that the additional step could slow down app distribution.
Here’s Xiaomi ADV verification process
We have gone through the documentation for Xiaomi’s ADV verification process, and it’s more or less similar for all brands.
The company opened ADV submissions on October 21 and set October 31 as the date it would begin checking sideloaded app installations. This means the warning may already be active on Xiaomi devices.
According to Xiaomi, its verification process checks three things: an app’s package name, signing key, and developer verification status. If a sideloaded app changes its package name or signing key, it must go through verification again.
Xiaomi also clarifies that ADV is not a security scan. It only establishes the identity of the developer behind an app. The company will continue running separate virus and malware checks on sideloaded applications. A verified app can still contain malicious code, while an unverified app is not automatically dangerous.
Developers distributing apps outside official stores must register through the Xiaomi HyperOS developer platform. They first complete real-name verification as an individual or company, a process Xiaomi says takes one to three working days. They then upload a signed empty APK and associate it with the app’s package name. The actual app verification is automated and takes effect immediately.
Oppo, Vivo, and Honor have also published developer documentation, although we could not independently confirm their exact rollout dates or submission procedures.
Google is also tightening Android sideloading rules
Google began its rollout on September 30, 2026, in Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. The requirement covers app installations from seven app stores, including Honor App Market, Oppo App Market, V-Appstore, and Xiaomi GetApps. Google plans to expand developer verification to all certified Android devices in 2027.
Google also provides an advanced installation process that lets users install apps from unregistered developers after a 24-hour waiting period. The Chinese alliance’s announcement does not mention a similar option for its ADV system.
Each of the four manufacturers has published its own developer documentation:
The four brands are building a shared verification system, but it remains unclear whether other Chinese smartphone manufacturers will join the initiative.
Colorful has released a new 100W travel charger in China. The iGame Sigil 100W GaN charger goes on sale on JD.com with an introductory price of 129 yuan ($19). It is a standard three-port brick that includes support for the newer PD 3.2 AVS charging protocol, which is particularly relevant for recent high-draw devices like the iPhone 18 Pro.
Colorful iGame Sigil 100W Charger Specs
The charger uses a familiar 2C+1A configuration, meaning it has two USB-C ports and one USB-A port. If you are only using one of the USB-C ports, the charger can output the full 100W, which is enough to run most modern laptops. The USB-A port tops out at 33W when used alone. When you plug in multiple devices, the charger automatically divides the power based on what is connected.
Using both USB-C ports allows for power splits like 65W and 35W, or 45W and 45W. If you use all three ports at the same time, the primary USB-C port provides 65W, while the second USB-C port and the USB-A port share the remaining power at 7.5W each.
The charger supports PD 3.2 AVS (Adaptive Voltage Scaling), which allows it to continuously adjust its output voltage between 9V and 20V based on the connected device’s requirements. This enables charging speeds of up to 54W for the iPhone 18 Pro series. According to Colorful’s test data, it can charge an iPhone 18 Pro to 50% in approximately 15 minutes and 81% in 30 minutes.
Internally, the charger relies on a GaN power management chip from Southchip Semiconductor. It includes active Power Factor Correction (PFC) and is built to handle a wide 100-240V input range. Colorful also used a fully integrated potting process for the build.
This means the internal components are encased in a solid compound with no empty cavities, which helps transfer heat away from the components and makes the charger more resistant to physical vibrations or drops. It also includes standard safety features to prevent overheating, short circuits, and overvoltage.
The iGame Sigil supports common fast-charging protocols like PPS, QC, SCP, and FCP, making it compatible with hardware from Samsung, Xiaomi, Huawei, Vivo, and others. In Colorful’s lab tests, a 30-minute charge brought a 14-inch MacBook Pro M5 to 63% and a Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra to 78%.
The charger is available in three colors: Cloud White, Crimson Red, and Ice Blue.
Timex has launched a new limited-edition variant of its Marlin watch in the US, introducing a California dial to the vintage-inspired line. The Marlin California Dial Limited Edition is priced at $299 and is restricted to a production run of just 200 individually numbered units.
Design Details
The watch comes with a traditional California dial that combines two types of numerals on a single face. The upper half uses Roman numerals for the 10, 11, 1, and 2 o’clock positions, while the lower half features standard Arabic numerals for the 4, 5, 7, and 8 o’clock positions.
Timex separates the two sections with horizontal stick markers at 3, 6, and 9 o’clock. The black dial features gold-tone numerals, while the hands include luminescent material for visibility in low-light conditions.
The physical dimensions of the watch remain identical to the standard 34mm Marlin. The case is polished stainless steel, measuring 34mm across and 13.5mm thick. By modern watch standards, 34mm is quite small, but it matches the 1960s sizing the watch is based on.
It weighs 33.2 grams and uses an 18mm lug width. The crystal covering the dial is domed acrylic. Acrylic is a plastic polymer that scratches more easily than the sapphire glass used on many modern watches, though minor scuffs can usually be polished out with a specialized paste.
The watch is powered by a mechanical hand-wound movement, which means it does not require a battery or feature an automatic rotor. Instead, you need to manually wind the crown to keep it running. It also offers 30-meter water resistance.
In practical terms, this means the watch can handle rain or washing your hands, but it is not sealed for use in the shower or a swimming pool. The watch comes with a brown leather strap that includes quick-release spring bars, making it easy to swap bands without using a tool.
Timex is producing only 200 units of the watch, with the first 100 sold in person at the Windup Watch Fair in New York City. The remaining 100 units, numbered 101 through 200, are now available through the Timex US website. Each watch also features its individual production number engraved on the case back.
iPad Mini 8 (2026) and iPad Pro 11-inch (M4) are designed for two very different types of tablet users. While the iPad Mini focuses on portability, convenient handling and powerful performance in a compact form, the iPad Pro is built for users who need a larger workspace, advanced display technology and professional-grade computing capabilities.
Interestingly, the iPad Mini 8 brings several premium features of its own, including an 8.5-inch OLED display, the A20 Pro chipset, IP67 water and dust resistance and Apple Pencil support. Meanwhile, the M4 iPad Pro retains its appeal through its larger 120Hz Tandem OLED display, powerful M4 processor, Thunderbolt connectivity and professional creative features.
Rather than treating one as an outright winner, this comparison looks at where the two tablets differ, what each one offers and which type of buyer will benefit more from each device.
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
2. Design and Display
Build Quality
The biggest difference between the iPad Mini 8 and iPad Pro 11-inch is their size and portability. The iPad Mini 8 measures 195.3 x 132.6 x 5.4mm and weighs just 255g for the Wi-Fi model, making it considerably easier to carry, hold with one hand and use while travelling. It also features IP67 water and dust resistance, offering additional protection against accidental exposure to water and dust.
In comparison, the iPad Pro M4 measures 249.7 x 177.5 x 5.3mm and weighs 444g. Its larger aluminium construction makes it better suited to desk-based work, drawing and landscape-oriented use, although it is less convenient to hold for extended periods.
Display & Multimedia
The Mini features an 8.5-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display with a resolution of 1512 x 2316 pixels and approximately 325ppi pixel density. It also offers 600 nits of typical brightness and up to 1,200 nits in HDR conditions.
The Pro features a larger 11-inch Ultra Retina Tandem OLED display with 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10 and Dolby Vision support. It reaches 1,000 nits of typical brightness and up to 1,600 nits peak brightness. Its larger screen makes it more comfortable for watching movies, editing content and working across multiple applications.
Verdict
The Mini suits readers, travellers and portability-focused users who prefer a compact OLED tablet. The Pro is more suitable for those who want a larger, brighter and smoother display for creative work, productivity and multimedia.
3. Performance and Software
Processor & UI Smoothness
The iPad Mini 8 is powered by Apple’s A20 Pro chipset built on a 2nm process, while the iPad Pro 11-inch uses the M4 processor. Both are powerful Apple silicon platforms, but they target different computing requirements.
The A20 Pro features a penta-core CPU on the 128GB and 256GB variants, while the 512GB version gets a hexa-core CPU. Its 7-core GPU makes the Mini suitable for demanding applications, gaming, browsing and everyday creative tasks.
The M4, on the other hand, is designed for more demanding professional workloads. Its CPU configuration ranges from 9 cores on the 256GB and 512GB models to 10 cores on the 1TB and 2TB variants. The 10-core GPU also makes it better suited to intensive graphics applications, high-resolution video editing and complex creative projects.
Productivity & Multitasking
Both tablets offer the iPadOS experience, but their screen sizes influence how comfortably applications can be used together. The Mini is better for quick tasks, reading documents, taking notes and working on the move.
The Pro’s larger display provides more room for multitasking, document editing and creative workflows. It also offers 8GB RAM on the 256GB and 512GB variants, increasing to 16GB on the 1TB and 2TB models. The Mini offers 12GB RAM across its storage configurations.
Verdict
The Mini offers powerful performance in a compact package, making it suitable for everyday computing and entertainment. The Pro is better suited to users who regularly edit videos, handle demanding projects or want a larger workspace for professional applications.
4. Battery and Accessories
Battery Life
The iPad Mini 8 packs a 4,900mAh lithium-ion battery, while the iPad Pro M4 features an 8,160mAh lithium-polymer battery. The difference in capacity reflects their different sizes and hardware requirements.
The Mini’s smaller display and compact design make it convenient for reading, browsing and casual entertainment. Meanwhile, the Pro’s larger battery accommodates its bigger display and more demanding hardware. Actual battery endurance will depend on display brightness, applications and usage patterns.
The Mini supports wired charging and can reach 50% charge in approximately 30 minutes. The Pro also supports wired charging, although its charging performance depends on the compatible adapter used.
Stylus, Keyboard & Ecosystem
Both tablets support stylus input, making them useful for handwriting, sketching and creative work. However, the larger display of the Pro gives digital artists and professionals more room to work comfortably.
The Mini is better suited to handwritten notes, quick sketches and portable productivity. Its compact dimensions make it easier to carry between classes, meetings and different locations.
The Pro is more appropriate for users who want a larger tablet workspace, particularly when paired with a compatible keyboard and stylus. Its larger screen makes document editing, typing and creative applications more comfortable.
Verdict
The Mini makes more sense for portable note-taking, reading and casual productivity. The Pro is a better choice for users who want a larger workspace for extended writing, drawing and professional tasks.
5. Camera & Media
Rear and Front Camera
Both tablets feature a 12MP rear camera with an f/1.8 aperture and autofocus, making them suitable for everyday photography, document scanning and capturing occasional videos.
However, the iPad Pro M4 offers additional camera hardware, including a TOF 3D LiDAR scanner for depth sensing and a Quad-LED dual-tone flash. It also supports ProRes video recording at 4K and 1080p, giving it more flexibility for professional video workflows.
The iPad Mini 8 keeps things simpler with its single 12MP rear camera and multi-focus LED flash. It supports HDR and panorama photography, alongside 4K video recording at up to 60fps.
For selfies and video calls, both tablets feature a 12MP ultrawide front camera with a 122-degree field of view. The Mini has an f/2.0 aperture, while the Pro features an f/2.4 aperture. Both support 1080p video recording.
Video & Audio Quality
The iPad Pro has an advantage for professional video work with ProRes recording and its four-speaker audio system. The Mini offers stereo audio using Acoustic Display technology, providing a different multimedia experience in a smaller form factor.
Verdict
The Mini is suitable for video calls, document scanning and casual photography. The Pro is more appealing to content creators and professionals who need LiDAR capabilities, ProRes recording and a more immersive four-speaker setup.
6. Pricing
The iPad Mini 8 (2026) carries an approximate price of $700 (₹83,000), while the iPad Pro 11-inch (M4) costs approximately $1,000 (₹1,00,000). This creates a noticeable price difference, positioning the Mini as the more affordable entry point into Apple’s premium tablet experience.
The Mini’s pricing is particularly interesting because it brings several high-end features, including an OLED display, A20 Pro chipset, IP67 protection and stylus support. Buyers who primarily need a tablet for reading, entertainment, note-taking, browsing and occasional creative work may find it difficult to justify spending more on the Pro.
However, the additional investment in the M4 model brings a larger 120Hz Tandem OLED display, a more capable professional computing platform, Thunderbolt connectivity, four speakers and additional camera capabilities.
Verdict
The Mini is the more sensible purchase for portability-focused buyers who want premium features without spending as much. The Pro makes more financial sense when its additional productivity and creative capabilities will actually be used.
The iPad Mini 8 and iPad Pro M4 have different strengths, making their unique features more important than their overall specifications.
The Mini’s biggest attraction is its compact form factor, weighing just 255g while offering an 8.5-inch OLED display, A20 Pro processing, IP67 protection and stylus support. It is designed for users who want a capable tablet that can easily accompany them everywhere. Its smaller dimensions also make it a convenient option for reading, handwritten notes, casual entertainment and everyday browsing.
The iPad Pro M4 focuses on a more complete computing experience. Its larger 11-inch Tandem OLED display with 120Hz refresh rate, M4 chipset, Thunderbolt connectivity, LiDAR scanner, ProRes video recording and four-speaker system make it better suited to demanding creative and professional work.
Verdict
The iPad Mini 8 is a better fit for students, readers, travellers, casual gamers and people who prefer a lightweight tablet for everyday use. The iPad Pro M4 is more appropriate for designers, digital artists, video editors, professionals and users who want to replace some laptop workflows with an iPad.
Ultimately, the decision comes down to how the tablet will be used. The Mini prioritises convenience and portability, while the Pro prioritises workspace, creative flexibility and productivity. Neither is a direct replacement for the other because they serve distinctly different tablet experiences.
Disclaimer: The specifications, features and pricing mentioned in this comparison are based on the information available at the time of writing. Actual specifications, availability and pricing may vary by market and are subject to change.
One UI 9.5, expected to land with the Galaxy S27 series in early 2027, is already in active internal testing. Recent finds from early builds and app strings (spotted by SammyGuru) highlight two notable changes.
First up, the basic Galaxy AI tools that helped popularize the suite, including Photo Assist, Browsing Assist, Now Brief, and similar features, look like they’ll stay free. But the same leaks suggest they may come with usage limits. Once you hit those limits, you might need to buy credit top-ups or move to a higher tier.
There’s also talk of a new Galaxy AI Premium (sometimes referred to as a Max plan) subscription currently being tested. This would unlock extra capabilities and higher usage allowances. Reported premium features include Gen Video (creating AI videos from photos), Bixby Action (automating tasks across apps), and Daily Briefing, along with expanded limits on the existing tools.
Pricing strings found in the software currently show $4.99 per month or $47.99 per year, though these numbers aren’t final and could easily change. Early access testing is also mentioned, with any payments during that phase reportedly refundable. Availability may start with the S27 series.
Separately, DeX is getting some focused refinements, especially around the Samsung Browser. Instead of just stretching the mobile interface, the browser is being prepared with a more authentic desktop layout when used in DeX. Leaks describe a desktop-style sidebar, support for side-by-side webpage viewing, and an integrated Galaxy AI panel with tools like summarize, translate, read highlights, and ask questions. The goal seems to be making the experience feel closer to a native desktop browser when you’re on a larger screen or external display.
The leak offers an early look at how One UI 9.5 could expand both paid AI options and productivity tools for DeX users.
Apple followed a split launch strategy this year by only launching the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max at the September event. The first-gen foldable phone, iPhone Duo, was also a part of the event, but the standard iPhone 18 didn’t make an appearance.
The iPhone 18 is expected to arrive in early 2027. Some reputed leaksters say it will be priced higher than iPhone 17. So, the real question is: if it’s worth waiting a few months to get the iPhone 18 at higher prices, or get the iPhone 17 right now? Will the upcoming model bring enough solid upgrades to justify a price hike? Let’s find out.
Upgrades coming to iPhone 18
Apple hasn’t said anything about the iPhone 18, but extensive leaks in recent weeks have revealed almost everything about the device, including price hike details.
The iPhone 18 is expected to ship with a 2nm A20 chipset (Pro’s have A20 Pro chips). Of course, the performance is going to be better, but the switch to a 2nm node should bring a greater impact on battery efficiency.
According to Digital Chat Station, a Chinese tipster with a strong track record in Apple leaks, the standard iPhone 18 will switch to Apple’s C2 modem instead of using one made by Qualcomm. The Pro models also use the same modem.
The iPhone 18 will reportedly bring RAM upgrades as well. According to analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, it will come with 9GB of RAM, up from 8GB RAM on the iPhone 17.
Besides these three potential upgrades, there’s one that even beats the iPhone 18 Pro, and that is: a 4430mAh battery on the standard iPhone 18. For comparison, the iPhone 17 has a 3692mAh battery and the iPhone 18 Pro has a 4288mAh battery.
Well, this wouldn’t be the first time seeing a bigger battery on a standard iPhone than on a Pro model, but the 20% bigger battery compared to iPhone 17 is a big deal. This is only a rumor for now, but Apple fans are already sharing their excitement on public forums such as Reddit (1,2).
Other specs will reportedly remain unchanged. So, you may still get a 120Hz 6.3″ LTPO OLED screen, dual 48MP rear camera setup, an 18MP selfie camera with center stage, IP68 rating, and 40W wired charging support.
Price hikes are also coming
The iPhone 18 will reportedly face a price hike on top of already hiked prices of the iPhone 17. It is expected to cost $999 for the base variant with 256GB storage. The iPhone 17 with the same storage is currently priced at $899 after a recent hike of $100.
Is it worth waiting for the iPhone 18?
Based on the leaks and rumors so far, the iPhone 18 would essentially bring upgraded performance and a 20% larger battery. And for that you may have to pay an additional $100. If those upgrades and the price hike sound good, it’s better to wait.
However, if you’re a light user, the iPhone 17 is actually a better choice. The device comfortably lasts a day on normal usage, and doesn’t lag in everyday operations. Plus, you’ll save $100 and won’t have to wait for months to upgrade.
You can read about detailed coverage of iPhone 18 on this page.
Vivo may have an 11,970mAh smartphone battery in mass production, according to a new leak. Weibo tipster Digital Chat Station said today that the “blue” manufacturer is keeping up with the growing trend of larger phone batteries. He did not mention the brand directly, but the color reference points to Vivo.
The tipster claims the largest battery currently in mass production has a rated capacity of 11,970mAh, putting it in the 12,000mAh class. He did not reveal which phone will use the cell, but added that Vivo has an even bigger battery planned for a future device with a larger display.
The claim follows an earlier post from Digital Chat Station in February, when he said Vivo was testing a phone with a single-cell silicon battery with a typical capacity between 11,000mAh and 12,000mAh. That device was still in testing at the time. The latest post suggests the battery may have since progressed to mass production.
The tipster also answered a few questions from readers about Vivo’s upcoming devices. One asked when the company’s next foldable would arrive next year and whether it would use a flagship 2nm processor.
Digital Chat Station says the 2nm chip would not be a problem, but Vivo still needs to settle on the phone’s form factor. The company is reportedly considering either a large foldable or a wider design.
Another reader asked about a flagship phone with a mid-sized display, seemingly referring to iQOO. The tipster replied, “I guess so,” although the brief response does not confirm any specific device or launch plans.
Huawei Pura 90 Plus and Vivo X300 Pro approach flagship smartphone photography and performance differently. While Huawei focuses on premium display technology, a large main camera sensor and versatile charging options, Vivo brings a powerful Dimensity processor, advanced camera hardware and a more feature-rich Android experience. Both target premium buyers, but their differences could make one a considerably better purchase.
Vivo – Android ecosystem and five major OS updates
Chipset
Kirin 9025
Dimensity 9500 (3nm)
Vivo – More powerful flagship chipset
RAM
12GB
Up to 16GB
Vivo – Higher RAM capacity
Storage
256GB, 512GB, 1TB
256GB, 512GB, 1TB
Vivo – Higher RAM on selected variants
Storage Technology
Not specified
Dual UFS 4.1
Vivo – UFS 4.1
Main Camera
50MP, 1-inch sensor, variable aperture, OIS
50MP, 1/1.28-inch sensor, OIS
Huawei – Larger sensor and variable aperture
Telephoto Camera
48MP periscope, 4x optical zoom, OIS
200MP periscope, 3.7x optical zoom, OIS
Vivo – Higher-resolution telephoto
Ultrawide Camera
40MP
50MP with autofocus
Vivo – Higher resolution and autofocus
Camera Features
Laser AF, colour spectrum sensor
Zeiss optics, T* coating, Laser AF, 3D LUT import
Vivo – More specialised camera features
Rear Video
4K, 1080p, HDR Vivid
8K@30fps, 4K@120fps, Dolby Vision HDR
Vivo – More advanced recording
Selfie Camera
13MP with autofocus
50MP with autofocus
Vivo – Higher resolution
Selfie Video
4K, 1080p
4K@60fps, 1080p
Vivo – 4K at 60fps
Loudspeaker
Stereo speakers
Stereo speakers
Tie – Same configuration
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 7
Wi-Fi 7
Tie – Same standard
Bluetooth
6.0
5.4
Huawei – Newer Bluetooth version
NFC
Yes
Yes
Tie – Both support NFC
Infrared
Yes
Yes
Tie – Both include infrared
USB
USB-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG
USB-C 3.2, OTG
Huawei – DisplayPort support
Fingerprint Sensor
Side-mounted
Under-display ultrasonic
Vivo – More advanced sensor placement and technology
Satellite Connectivity
BDS satellite messaging (China only)
Optional satellite connectivity, market dependent
Tie – Both offer satellite features
Battery Capacity
5700mAh
6510mAh (Global), 5440mAh (EU)
Vivo – Larger global battery
Wired Charging
100W
90W
Huawei – Faster charging
Wireless Charging
80W
40W
Huawei – Faster wireless charging
Reverse Charging
18W wired, wireless reverse charging
Wired and wireless reverse charging
Huawei – 18W wired reverse charging
Price
Approx. $730 / ₹73,500
Approx. $1,000 / ₹1,10,000
Huawei – More affordable
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
2. Design and Display
Build and Feel
The Huawei Pura 90 Plus features a glass front protected by Kunlun Glass 2, an aluminum frame and an aluminosilicate glass back. The Vivo X300 Pro combines Armor Glass protection with an aluminum frame and glass back. Both carry IP68/IP69 ratings, offering protection against dust and water. Huawei’s Kunlun Glass 2 adds a distinctive touch, while Vivo’s Armor Glass keeps its construction equally competitive.
Display Quality
Huawei equips the Pura 90 Plus with a 6.8-inch LTPO OLED display featuring a 1276 x 2848 resolution, 120Hz refresh rate and 1440Hz PWM dimming. The Vivo X300 Pro has a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED panel with a 1260 x 2800 resolution, 120Hz refresh rate and 2160Hz PWM dimming. Vivo additionally supports HDR10+, Dolby Vision and a claimed 4500-nit peak brightness, making its display more feature-rich.
Verdict
Vivo X300 Pro takes the display advantage with Dolby Vision, HDR10+ and higher peak brightness. Huawei remains competitive with its high-resolution OLED panel and Kunlun Glass 2 protection.
3. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Huawei Pura 90 Plus runs HarmonyOS 7 and uses the Kirin 9025 chipset, paired with 12GB RAM and up to 1TB storage. Vivo takes a different approach with Android 16, OriginOS 6 and the 3nm MediaTek Dimensity 9500 processor. It also offers up to 16GB RAM and UFS 4.1 storage. Vivo’s newer flagship chipset and higher memory configurations make it the stronger choice on paper for demanding applications and multitasking.
Battery and Charging
Huawei packs a 5700mAh battery with 100W wired charging, 80W wireless charging and 18W reverse wired charging. The Vivo X300 Pro offers a larger 6510mAh silicon-carbon battery in its global configuration, although European markets receive a 5440mAh version. Charging includes 90W wired and 40W wireless support, alongside reverse wireless and reverse wired charging. Vivo’s larger global battery capacity is appealing, while Huawei offers faster wireless charging.
Vivo X300 Pro wins on chipset capability, RAM configurations and global battery capacity. Huawei counters with faster wired and wireless charging, but Vivo offers the more complete hardware package.
4. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
The Huawei Pura 90 Plus features a 50MP one-inch main camera with variable f/1.6–4.0 aperture, a 48MP periscope telephoto camera with 4x optical zoom and a 40MP ultrawide camera. Vivo counters with a 50MP main sensor, a 200MP periscope telephoto camera offering 3.7x optical zoom and a 50MP ultrawide lens. Huawei’s one-inch sensor is a notable advantage, but Vivo’s 200MP telephoto hardware offers greater resolution and dedicated macro capabilities.
Vivo also brings Zeiss optics, T* lens coating and 3D LUT import, adding more specialised photography and image-processing features. Its video capabilities extend to 8K recording at 30fps and 4K at up to 120fps, including 10-bit Log and Dolby Vision HDR. Huawei supports 4K recording with HDR Vivid, gyro-EIS and OIS. Vivo offers a more comprehensive video toolkit, making it particularly attractive to content creators.
Selfie Camera
The Huawei Pura 90 Plus features a 13MP front camera with autofocus, HDR and 4K video recording. Vivo significantly upgrades the front-camera hardware with a 50MP sensor, autofocus and a 20mm wide-angle lens. It also supports 4K recording at 30fps and 60fps. For buyers who regularly capture selfies, record front-facing videos or create social media content, Vivo’s higher-resolution camera and additional recording options make it the more versatile option.
Verdict
Vivo X300 Pro wins the overall camera comparison with its 200MP periscope, Zeiss features, advanced video recording and 50MP selfie camera. Huawei’s one-inch main sensor remains a compelling alternative.
5. Pricing
The Huawei Pura 90 Plus is priced around $730 / ₹73,500, while the Vivo X300 Pro is priced around $1,000 / ₹1,10,000. This creates a substantial price difference between the two smartphones. Huawei is considerably more affordable, making it an interesting option for buyers seeking premium camera hardware, a high-resolution display and fast charging without spending flagship-level Vivo money.
Huawei Pura 90 Plus wins on affordability and value for money. Vivo X300 Pro costs considerably more, but its stronger overall hardware makes the premium worthwhile for demanding flagship buyers.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
The Huawei Pura 90 Plus stands out with its one-inch main camera sensor, Kunlun Glass 2 protection, 4x optical zoom and 80W wireless charging. Its combination of camera hardware and charging technology makes it an interesting alternative in the premium segment. The Vivo X300 Pro distinguishes itself with a 200MP periscope camera, Zeiss optics, 8K video recording, a 50MP selfie camera and a 3nm Dimensity 9500 chipset. Its Android 16 platform and up to 16GB RAM further strengthen its flagship credentials.
Verdict
Vivo X300 Pro is the overall winner. Its superior processing platform, versatile camera system, advanced video capabilities and larger global battery make it the more complete flagship, despite its significantly higher price.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
Huawei‘s upcoming OSTA O1 Pro has surfaced in a new leak. Digital Chat Station shared a photo today showing a phone with a wide, flat display and a centered punch-hole camera, confirming Huawei’s upcoming sub-brand will have a wide smartphone as its first product.
Huawei working on a smartphone sub-brand called Starlight has been in the news for a while. More recent reports suggest the brand will use OSTA as its English name, with the O1 Pro expected to be its first phone. The brand is reportedly set to launch this month.
Huawei hasn’t confirmed either the brand or the phone yet. The front has a flat screen with a centered selfie camera, while the wallpaper’s branding has added to speculation about its identity.
What the OSTA O1 Pro is expected to offer
The OSTA O1 Pro is tipped to have a 6.39-inch 1.5K LTPS display with a flat panel and an unusual 16:9.5 aspect ratio. Its bezels are reportedly around 1.05mm on all four sides.
The new phone is expected to come in three colors: Starry Black, Nebula White, and Starburst Purple. There could also be four memory and storage configurations, starting with 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. The other rumored options are 12GB+512GB, 16GB+512GB, and 16GB+1TB.
For now, the OSTA O1 Pro remains an unannounced device, and Huawei hasn’t confirmed any of the leaked specifications or pricing details. With the OSTA brand reportedly preparing to launch this month, we may not have to wait long to find out how much of the current information turns out to be accurate.
OnePlus Ace 7 Pro is now available to purchase through Giztop, with a starting price of $799. The online retailer offers express and global shipping options, making it available to buyers in different regions. The device combines a high-refresh-rate AMOLED display, Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon processor, a dual rear camera system, and a large-capacity battery.
Specifications and Features
The OnePlus Ace 7 Pro features a 6.78-inch flat AMOLED display with a 1.5K resolution of 2800 × 1272 pixels. It supports a 165Hz refresh rate and a 330Hz touch sampling rate for smooth scrolling, responsive touch controls and gaming. The panel also offers 100% DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage, HDR10+ support and up to 1,800 nits of peak brightness.
Under the hood, the smartphone is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor. It comes with 12GB or 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.1 storage options of up to 1TB. An independent graphics chip and HyperBoost Game Frame Stabilization Engine 2.0 are also included to improve gaming performance and help reduce frame drops during extended gaming sessions.
For photography, the OnePlus Ace 7 Pro features a dual rear camera setup comprising a 200MP Sony IMX906 primary sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS) and a 50MP ultra-wide-angle camera with a 120-degree field of view. On the front, there is a 16MP camera for selfies and video calls.
Battery, Software and Connectivity
The smartphone packs a large 9,000mAh battery with 120W SuperVOOC fast charging support. It also features an in-display fingerprint scanner, dual stereo speakers, an X-axis linear motor and an alert slider.
On the software side, the OnePlus Ace 7 Pro runs ColorOS 17 with Dark Mode 2.0, which brings support for more applications. Connectivity options include dual SIM support, dual 5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, GPS and NFC.
With its 165Hz display, flagship Snapdragon processor, 200MP main camera and 9,000mAh battery, the OnePlus Ace 7 Pro brings together several high-end features.
Apart from the Reno 17 series, the Oppo Pad Air 6 is up for pre-orders on the official Oppo Shop in China. The official listing has completely revealed the tablet’s entire specifications before the launch. Here’s a look at what to expect.
Oppo Pad Air 6 specifications and features
Oppo Pad Air 6
The Oppo Pad Air 6 uses a 12.1-inch LCD panel with a 7:5 aspect ratio and a 2800 x 1980 resolution. Refresh rate options run at 30Hz, 60Hz, 90Hz, and 120Hz, with a stated screen-to-body ratio of 88.5 percent and a pixel density of 284 PPI.
Typical brightness is listed at 600 nits, while peak brightness can reach 900 nits. The panel covers 98 percent DCI-P3 in Vivid mode and 100 percent sRGB in Natural mode, supports 1 billion colors, and carries a DeltaE figure of about 1. Touch sampling goes up to 540Hz, with 240Hz as the default.
Under the hood, the tablet is powered by MediaTek’s Dimensity 7360 Super, an octa-core chip with clocks up to 2.5GHz. Memory is LPDDR5X, storage is UFS 3.1, and the listing offers 8GB+128GB, 8GB+256GB, and 12GB+256GB configurations.
Buyers can choose a Wi-Fi model numbered OPD2613 or a SIM 5G model numbered OPD2614. Expandable storage is listed only for the SIM version. It packs a 10,050mAh battery with support for up to 33W SuperVOOC charging plus UFCS and PPS, along with 13.5W PD over USB Type-C.
Design-wise, the Pad Air 6 measures 266.01 x 192.77 x 6.89mm and weighs about 603 grams. Official colors are Encounter Blue and Starlight Silver, and both also appear as Soft Light editions. Imaging covers an 8-megapixel rear camera and an 8-megapixel front camera, with 1080p recording at 30fps on the rear.
Oppo Pad Air 6
Audio comes from four speakers and two microphones. The tablet runs ColorOS 17, supports face unlock, and skips fingerprint authentication. Connectivity includes Wi-Fi 6, and the cellular model adds satellite positioning systems such as BeiDou, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and QZSS.
On the software side, Oppo is highlighting a refreshed Notes experience with learning and AI tools, plus office features such as multi-screen connectivity, floating windows, and wireless printing. Compared with last year’s Oppo Pad Air 5, the new model keeps a similar 12.1-inch 2.8K 120Hz LCD and 10,050mAh battery recipe while moving to the Dimensity 7360 Super and ColorOS 17.
Oppo Pad Air 6 price and availability
Oppo will launch the Pad Air 6 in China on November 16, 2026, alongside the Reno 17 series and the Watch 5. Pre-orders are already open on the official Oppo Shop, and the company is running reservation promotions that include a low-cost lock-in for a one-year screen protection plan.
Retail pricing has not been published yet. The store page still shows a coming-soon price label, so expect the yuan figures and sale timing to land with the November 16 event. There is no official word yet on a global or India rollout.
Would you pick the Wi-Fi Pad Air 6 for everyday study and media, or are you waiting for the SIM 5G version?
Optoma‘s Photon Life PK31 is a compact 4K UHD home projector that can cast an image up to 150 inches and is currently selling for around $599 in the US. The RGB LED model is aimed at movie nights, streaming, and low-lag gaming without the bulk of a traditional living-room projector. Here is a look at the confirmed specifications and where you can buy it.
Optoma Photon Life PK31 specifications and features
Optoma Photon Life PK31
The Photon Life PK31 uses Texas Instruments DLP technology to deliver a 4K UHD image at 3840 x 2160. Optoma rates brightness at 900 ISO lumens, or 1,600 HK lumens, with a 200,000:1 contrast ratio and support for HDR10 and HLG.
Color coverage is listed at 95 percent of DCI-P3. The light source is an RGB LED system with a life of up to 30,000 hours in eco mode, so there is no lamp to replace during normal use.
Screen sizes run from 60 to 150 inches. The throw ratio is 1.5 to 1.65, which works out to roughly 2.1 to 5.2 meters of distance for that full size range, and a manual 1.1x optical zoom helps fine-tune the picture.
Gamers get Optoma’s Game Mode input-lag figures of 4.6ms at 1080p and 240Hz, 8ms at 1080p and 120Hz, and 16ms at 4K and 60Hz. Manual vertical and horizontal keystone correction covers up to 40 degrees in each direction for uneven placement.
Optoma Photon Life PK31
Connectivity is kept simple with one HDMI 2.0 port, a USB-A output rated at 5V/2A for powering a streaming stick, and a 3.5mm audio jack. A single 5W speaker handles onboard sound, while noise is rated as low as 26dB in eco mode and up to 32dB in bright mode.
The chassis measures 238 x 215 x 117.7mm without the feet, or 238 x 215 x 130mm with them, and net weight is about 2.2kg. That compact footprint makes it easier to move between rooms than Optoma’s larger home models, including the Photon Beam PK52 we reviewed earlier.
There is no built-in smart OS, Wi-Fi, or Bluetooth on the official spec sheet, so a Fire TV Stick, Roku, or similar HDMI dongle is the usual way to stream. The USB-A port can supply power to that stick, letting the whole setup run from a single wall outlet.
Optoma Photon Life PK31 price and availability
The Photon Life PK31 is available now in the US through major retailers, with current street pricing around $599.
In the UK, Optoma listed an MSRP of £699.99 at launch. An India price has not been confirmed, and there is no official word yet on a local rollout. Full specifications remain on Optoma’s US product page for buyers who want to dig deeper.
Would a $599 4K projector with a 150-inch ceiling change your living-room setup, or are you still waiting for a brighter short-throw option?
Oppo has officially confirmed that the Oppo Reno 17 series is set to go official on November 16 in China. The lineup will include the Reno 17 and the Reno 17 Pro, and alongside them the brand will also announce the Pad Air 6 and Watch 5. Ahead of the launch, the new Reno models are available for pre-orders, and the official listings carry images of the phones.
Oppo Reno 17 series’ official images
Oppo Reno 17Oppo Reno 17Oppo Reno 17Oppo Reno 17
Oppo has now filled those China store listings with official product shots, so the design of both phones is no longer a mystery. The company had already teased a cat-like glowing rear effect for the series, and the new renders show how that idea lands on the finished hardware.
The standard Oppo Reno 17 is listed in Encounter Cat, Ice Moon White, and Cocoa Brown. The Oppo Reno 17 Pro is listed in Encounter Cat, First Snow White, and Cocoa Brown. Encounter Cat is the light blue finish with the embossed cat outline on the rear panel, Ice Moon White uses a flowing ripple texture across the back glass, Cocoa Brown is the matte brown option, and First Snow White is the clean white finish reserved for the Pro.
The Pro model is smaller overall, and its front camera cutout is smaller than the one on the standard Reno 17. The white variants also look different in the official shots: First Snow White on the Pro is a clean, smooth white panel, while Ice Moon White on the standard model keeps the textured ripple finish. That split matches the separate color names already shown on Oppo’s China store pages.
Oppo Reno 17, Reno 17 Pro specifications (rumored)
Hardware details remain unofficial for now, though earlier Reno 17 and Reno 17 Pro specs leaks already sketched a clear split between the two. According to our sources, the phones differ on display size, chipset, and battery capacity, while sharing the same memory lineup.
The Oppo Reno 17 is said to feature a 6.59-inch OLED display with 1.5K resolution, powered by the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset. It could pack a large 8,000mAh battery to keep it running through the day.
The Oppo Reno 17 Pro, meanwhile, is tipped to come with a more compact 6.32-inch 1.5K OLED screen and the Dimensity 8550 Super chip. It may carry a 7,200mAh battery. Both phones are expected in 8GB+256GB, 12GB+256GB, and 12GB+512GB configurations.
Those numbers still need Oppo’s confirmation on November 16, but they already point to a larger battery on the standard model and a more compact chassis on the Pro. Oppo previously confirmed a November event for the Reno 17 series, Pad Air 6, and Watch 5, and the new date locks that plan to next week. Which Reno 17 color are you eyeing first?
Qualcomm’s newest flagship chip is called the Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. You need a breath to say it out loud. It is also the one thing the Motorola Signature 27 and the OnePlus 16 have in common.
Everything else is different. The Motorola Signature 27 is set to reach the US in November. The OnePlus 16 is only on sale in China. OnePlus has stopped launching new phones in Europe and North America. You can read all you like about the OnePlus 16. Most of you will not be able to buy one.
The spec sheets point in different directions too. OnePlus fitted the OnePlus 16 with a 9,000mAh-equivalent battery and a screen that runs at 185Hz in games. Motorola gave the Signature 27 a smaller 7,000mAh battery. It also has a 200MP periscope camera and a promise of seven years of OS updates.
Both phones are on the list of devices confirmed for Qualcomm’s new chip. That means speed will not decide this one. The battery, the cameras, the software support, and where you live will. Here is how the two phones compare.
On the chip itself, there is nothing to split them. Qualcomm says the Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 is built on a 2nm process. It claims a 13% CPU gain and a 44% GPU gain over the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Both phones get the same silicon.
OnePlus has built more around it. The OnePlus 16 has a G3 gaming network chip, a P4 display chip, and a T3 touch chip. As a result, multi-finger touch sampling can reach 520Hz, and the gyroscope samples at 800Hz. OnePlus also says the phone held an average of 185fps in Delta Force for three hours in its own testing.
Motorola is not selling the Motorola Signature 27 as a gaming phone. It pairs diamond-infused thermal gel with a new 3D vapor chamber to keep the chip cool. You can get up to 16GB of RAM. RAM Boost can stretch that to 24GB.
If you play competitive shooters, the OnePlus 16 makes the better case. For everything else, the Motorola Signature 27 should feel just as fast.
2. Display
The OnePlus 16 has a flat 6.78-inch BOE X4 OLED panel. It runs at up to 165Hz across the whole system and can reach 185Hz in supported games. We covered the BOE partnership and what it brings earlier. Also, the panel has 450ppi with 100% DCI-P3 coverage, can dim down to 1 nit of brightness, and uses 3,840Hz PWM dimming.
The Motorola Signature 27 has a 6.8-inch Extreme AMOLED Duo, or tandem OLED, display. Thus, Motorola claims the screen can reach up to 12,000 nits of peak brightness. We, however, cannot compare it directly with the 2,000 nits of brightness OnePlus quotes for the whole screen. The screen also supports Dolby Vision, and Audio by Bang & Olufsen handles sound.
3. Cameras
Both phones have a 200-megapixel camera, but they use it for different purposes. Motorola is using the sensor for a periscope telephoto camera, while OnePlus is using it for the main rear camera.
The Motorola Signature 27 pairs its 200MP periscope camera with a 50MP Sony LYTIA L910 main sensor featuring LOFIC technology. Motorola says this helps preserve details in both bright and dark areas of the same image. There is also a dedicated EVS Action Sensor for capturing fast-moving subjects in low light.
The OnePlus 16 has a 200MP main camera with a 1/1.4-inch sensor and optical image stabilization. It also gets a 50MP periscope camera with 3x optical and 6x lossless zoom, alongside a 50-megapixel ultrawide camera with a 116-degree field of view. The front camera is another 50MP unit with autofocus. For video, the phone supports 4K recording at 120fps with Dolby Vision.
On paper, the Motorola has an advantage for long-range photography, while the OnePlus has the higher-resolution main camera. Since the main camera is likely to be the one most people use regularly, this is an important difference. However, independent camera testing for both phones is still limited, so it is too early to draw firm conclusions about overall image quality.
4. Battery and charging
The OnePlus 16 wins in terms of battery. It packs a 9,000mAh dual-cell battery, with each cell rated at a typical capacity of 4,500mAh. Charging supports 100W wired and 50W wireless speeds, with OnePlus claiming a full charge from 1% takes just 52 minutes. The phone also supports 27W wired reverse charging.
OnePlus says the battery will retain at least 80% of its original capacity after five years, which is a useful promise given its large size.
The Motorola Signature 27 has a smaller 7,000mAh battery, with a rated capacity of 6,790mAh. It supports 90W wired and 50W wireless charging. Motorola claims just 12 minutes of wired charging can provide enough power for a full day of use, while a complete wireless charge takes up to 80 minutes. You will need to buy the chargers separately.
Motorola also quotes up to 77 hours of mixed-use battery life. OnePlus, meanwhile, provides individual test figures, including up to 23.8 hours of video playback. These measurements use different testing methods, so they do not tell us which phone will last longer in everyday use. Real-world battery tests will give us a better idea.
5. Design and durability
The Motorola Signature 27 comes in a Pantone Coal Smoke finish, with a warm gray color and a Tactical Weave texture on the back. The front has Gorilla Glass protection, while the phone carries IP68 and IP69 ratings for water and dust resistance. Motorola also says it passed 14 MIL-STD-810H procedures across 16 categories.
The OnePlus 16 comes in three colors: Tomorrow’s Starlight, Mars Red, and Deep Black. The Tomorrow’s Starlight version has an additional interstellar light effect on the back, which can glow for incoming calls, messages, and in-game events. The phone is built with a metal frame and carries IP66, IP68, IP69, and IP69K ratings.
Other hardware features include an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, a dedicated shortcut key, and stereo speakers.
6. Software and updates
Motorola has the advantage in software support. The company promises seven major Android OS updates and up to seven years of security updates for the Signature 27. Meanwhile, OnePlus promises five years of software updates and six years of security updates
Motorola’s software also includes Gemini Intelligence and Motorola Qira. The latter can help users find and recall information across different apps, although it requires a Motorola or Lenovo account and at least 12GB of RAM.
The OnePlus 16 runs ColorOS 17 with OPPO AI features. It can connect to Mac and Windows computers, answer calls from an iPhone, and pair with an Apple Watch.
Price and availability
Availability is probably the biggest difference between the two phones, particularly for buyers outside China.
The Motorola Signature 27 is priced at $1,599 in the US and €1,899 in Europe. However, select retailers and partners in some countries will offer it for a lower price of € 1,399. Sales begin on November 16 across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
The OnePlus 16, meanwhile, went on sale in China on October 31, with prices starting at CNY 5,999 (around $900). OnePlus has not announced international pricing or an overseas release date. For buyers outside China, importing the phone is currently the only realistic option.
7. Which one should you buy?
The Motorola Signature 27 makes more sense if you want longer software support, a 200-megapixel periscope camera, and a phone with a confirmed US release. Its tandem OLED display and durability ratings are also worth considering.
The OnePlus 16 is the better option on paper if battery capacity, charging speeds, and gaming performance matter more to you. Its 9,000mAh battery and 165Hz display give it some clear hardware advantages. The bigger problem is availability, as buyers outside China still have no confirmed international release to look forward to.
8. Motorola Signature 27 vs OnePlus 16: key specs
Motorola Signature 27
OnePlus 16
Chipset
Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
Display
6.8-inch Extreme AMOLED Duo
6.78-inch flat BOE X4 OLED, 1–165Hz
Brightness claim
Up to 12,000 nits
2,000 nits global
Main camera
50MP Sony LYTIA L910
200MP, 1/1.4-inch, OIS
Telephoto
200MP periscope
50MP periscope, 3x optical
Ultrawide
50MP
50MP, 116°
Battery
7,000mAh
9,000mAh equivalent (dual-cell)
Wired charging
90W
100W
Wireless charging
50W
50W
Water and dust rating
IP68 and IP69
IP66, IP68, IP69 and IP69K
Software
Android with Gemini Intelligence and Motorola Qira
Casio is releasing a new set of G-Shock watches in November 2026. Instead of their usual bright colors, these four new models, the DW-6900MTM-8, DW-5600MTM-8, DW-5900MTM-8, and DWE-5600MTM-8, stick to a simple black-and-gray monochromatic color scheme. They are currently listed on Casio’s Japanese website and up for order.
The collection updates three standard G-Shock designs: the 5600, 6900, and 5900. Rather than using the same material all over, Casio mixed matte black and gray resin parts with a few metal details.
For example, the metal band loops have a textured finish, and the glass has a silver coating that makes it slightly reflective. The DW-6900MTM-8 also has a matching metal front button.
The DWE-5600MTM-8 is a bit different from the rest of the group. It features a band made from a mix of materials. The bottom half of the strap is made of stainless steel links, while the top half uses urethane and resin, including one clear resin link. The face of this watch also has a printed gray mesh pattern instead of the silver glass coating.
Inside, these are standard G-Shocks. They come with the usual features: shock resistance, 200-meter water resistance, stopwatches, timers, and LED backlights.
The 5600 and 6900 models have a battery that lasts about five years, while the 5900 model has a 10-year battery and a world time feature.
As for pricing, the DW-5600MTM-8 and DW-5900MTM-8 are priced at ¥15,950 ($100.74). The DW-6900MTM-8 costs ¥17,050 ($107.69), while the DWE-5600MTM-8 with the mixed-material band is priced at ¥28,050 ($177.05).
Xiaomi has released a new desk accessory in China for people who spend their entire day in an office chair. The Mijia Heated Posture Support Cushion is exactly what its name suggests: an ergonomic seat attachment with built-in heating and sensors to track how long you’ve been sitting. It is currently available for an introductory price of 186.65 yuan ($28).
Mijia Heated Posture Support Cushion Specs
The cushion features a one-piece nylon composite frame that has passed 25,000 bending cycle tests for durability and resistance to deformation. It also comes with high-resilience memory foam that provides support for the lower back, hips, and legs.
The design is meant to fill the gap between your lower spine and the back of your chair, which helps distribute your weight more evenly and keeps you sitting upright. To keep the foam from trapping too much body heat during a long workday, the base includes two ventilation holes.
The electronic features are what make it a tech product rather than just a standard piece of office furniture. The cushion includes an infrared sensor that monitors your sitting time.
If you sit continuously for 40 minutes, it sends a reminder to stand up. It sends follow-up alerts at the 90-minute and 120-minute marks. If you get up and leave the chair for more than two minutes, the system resets the timer.
For the heating element, the cushion uses an NTC temperature control system with three adjustable heat settings targeted at the lumbar region. As a safety measure, the heat only stays on for 15 minutes at a time before automatically shutting off, though you can manually turn it back on if you want another session.
Everything is powered by a built-in 1,900mAh battery. This allows the cushion to operate wirelessly, meaning you don’t have to run a cable across your floor to a wall outlet or keep it plugged into your computer. If the battery does die, it also works in a standard wired mode while charging.
In related news, Xiaomi has recently launched the Mijia Smart Waist Massager 2 with dual-sided heating and up to 110 minutes of battery life.
A first beta build of One UI 9.5 has already shown up on Samsung’s servers, and it’s raising hopes that the public beta could start before the end of November instead of the usual December timing.
The build in question is S948BXXU6ZZK3, made for the Galaxy S26 Ultra, and it was spotted on November 4. That’s more than three weeks earlier than the first One UI 8.5 beta firmware last year, which only appeared on November 25. Samsung eventually opened the One UI 8.5 public beta on December 8. With the new build surfacing this early, it looks like internal testing is further ahead this time, so there’s a realistic chance users could get invited sometime in the second half of November.
People have floated windows between roughly November 16 and 24, with a possible Monday start around November 23, though Samsung hasn’t confirmed anything yet. Just because a build is sitting on the servers doesn’t mean the public beta is right around the corner. The company still needs time for more testing, bug fixes, and prep work. Still, the early appearance is being seen as a good sign.
One UI 9.5 is expected to be based on Android 17 and should land in stable form alongside the Galaxy S27 series in early 2027. The beta phase usually kicks off with the current flagship S series (this year the S26 models) in a handful of markets like South Korea, the US, India, the UK, Germany, and Poland. Sign-ups typically happen through the Samsung Members app.
If development keeps moving at this pace, Galaxy owners who like getting early access to interface tweaks and new features could be in for a surprise. There’s a decent chance the first public One UI 9.5 builds arrive before December, giving everyone an early look at the mid-cycle update.
Samsung’s Galaxy S27 has officially received BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards) approval. The listing is for the model number SM-S952B/DS, and this is the first formal regulatory clearance in India for any phone in the upcoming S27 lineup.
The /DS at the end of the model number confirms it’s the dual-SIM version meant for markets like India. BIS filings don’t usually spill a lot of hardware details, but this same model number has already shown up in other databases. An earlier NBD entry linked SM-S952B to a 6.3-inch display, Samsung’s in-house Exynos 2700 chip, 12 GB of RAM, and 256 GB of storage. Separate certifications from China’s 3C authority and UL Solutions also point to 25 W wired charging, the same relatively conservative speeds we’ve seen on recent base Galaxy S models.
This fits Samsung’s usual dual-sourcing approach. The company still likes to mix its own Exynos silicon with Snapdragon chips depending on the region, and the Exynos 2700 is expected to show up in select Asian and European markets.
Regulatory clearances like this typically appear a couple of months before mass production really ramps up. That puts Samsung in a good position to lock in component supply and logistics for an early 2027 launch window, right in line with the usual January or February timing for the Galaxy S series.
The BIS approval doesn’t tell us anything about the cameras, battery size, pricing, or exact availability dates. What it does confirm is that the standard Galaxy S27 is moving through the pre-launch checklist for India on schedule. We should start seeing more listings for the rest of the S27 family in the coming weeks as Samsung gets ready for its next Unpacked event and the usual regional rollouts that follow.
In short, Indian authorities have given the green light, and the regular Galaxy S27 looks like it’s progressing smoothly toward its expected 2027 debut.
Timex is expanding its higher-end Atelier collection today, introducing new colorways and material updates to two of its primary mechanical models: the Marine M1a and the GMT24 M1a.
While Timex is traditionally known for its highly accessible quartz pieces, the Atelier line represents the company’s ongoing push into the premium tool watch category, utilizing Swiss automatic movements and upgraded case constructions.
The updated Marine M1a is a 41mm dive-style watch that now features a deep blue enamel dial paired with a blue ceramic unidirectional bezel insert. The watch utilizes a skeletonized stainless steel case architecture that incorporates a black IP-coated mid-case.
Inside is a Swiss-made Catena SA 100 automatic movement. It operates at 28,800 vibrations per hour, features 29 jewels, and offers a 38-hour power reserve, which is visible through an exhibition case back.
For durability, Timex is using a double-curved sapphire crystal treated with a triple-layer anti-reflective coating. The watch maintains a standard 200-meter water resistance rating, aided by a screw-down crown.
It starts at $950 on a blue NBR (Nitrile Butadiene Rubber) synthetic strap and goes up to $1,050 for the stainless steel bracelet version.
For those who regularly track multiple time zones, Timex has also refreshed the GMT24 M1a. This model drops the case size slightly to 40mm and swaps the black mid-case for a gunmetal IP-coated version.
The dial is black enamel, contrasted by a red and blue 24-hour scale and a dedicated GMT hand for tracking a second time zone alongside a standard date window at 3 o’clock.
The GMT24 is powered by a Swiss-made Landeron 24 GMT automatic movement, which provides a slightly longer 40-hour power reserve. Instead of the double-curved crystal found on the Marine, the GMT24 opts for a raised glass-box sapphire crystal.
Water resistance on this model is capped at 100 meters. The GMT24 M1a is priced at $1,350 on the NBR rubber strap and $1,450 on a stainless steel bracelet.
Both models include Swiss LumiNova on the hands and indices for visibility in the dark. They also feature quick-release spring bars so you can swap straps without tools.
The stainless steel bracelet option comes with a butterfly deployant clasp and self-adjustable links, which means you can resize the bracelet at home without needing a pin pusher or specialized watch tools.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
