Oppo has officially confirmed that it will unveil the Find X7 series of smartphones at 2:30 pm (local time) on Jan. 8, 2024, in China. In addition, the Find X7 and Find X7 Ultra smartphones are now listed on Oppo China’s online store for reservations. The official listings have confirmed the configurations and color options of both smartphones well ahead of the official announcement.
Oppo Find X7 series launch date
Oppo Find X7
Reports have revealed that the Find X7 will come equipped with the Dimensity 9300 chipset. The official listing reveals that it will come in four configurations, such as 12 GB RAM + 256 GB storage, 16 GB RAM + 256 GB storage, 16 GB RAM + 512 GB storage, and 16 GB RAM + 1 TB storage.
The Find X7 will be available in four shades, such as Starry Sky Black, Sea and Sky, Desert Moon Silver, and Smokey Purple.
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
The Find X7 Ultra is expected to come equipped with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SoC. It will be available in three variants, such as 12 GB RAM + 256 GB storage, 16 GB RAM + 256 GB storage, and 16 GB RAM + 512 GB storage.
Find X7 Ultra: Pine Shadow InkFind X7 Ultra: Sea and SkyFind X7 Ultra: Desert Moon Silver.
When it comes to color options, the Find X7 Ultra will come in choices such as Pine Shadow Ink, Sea and Sky, and Desert Moon Silver.
The Find X7 and Find X7 Ultra have a similar design, with the front featuring a punch-hole display with curved edges and a dual-tone back panel with a massive camera module. The Find X7 has a triple-camera unit, whereas the Find X7 Ultra has a quad-camera system. The Ultra variant will be the world’s first smartphone to feature dual periscope telephoto cameras. In addition, it will also be the first-ever phone to feature the one-inch Sony LYT-900 50-megapixel camera sensor as the primary snapper.
It is said that there will be a third device called the Oppo Find X7 Ultra Satellite Communication Version, which will come with support for two-way satellite communication. The rest of its specs will be identical to the Find X7 Ultra.
The flagship smartphone battle is becoming increasingly competitive, with Vivo and Xiaomi taking different approaches to premium hardware. The Vivo X500 Pro Max promises an impressive display, a massive battery and versatile Zeiss cameras, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra focuses on advanced imaging, powerful processing and Leica-tuned photography. Both target demanding users, but their differences in camera technology, battery capacity, display quality and pricing make this comparison particularly interesting.
Armor Glass, aluminium frame, glass or glass-fiber back
Glass front, aluminium frame, glass-fiber or silicone polymer back
Xiaomi – Aerospace-grade glass fiber construction
Water Resistance
IP68/IP69, up to 1.5m for 30 minutes
IP68/IP69, up to 6m for 30 minutes
Xiaomi – Better water resistance
Display
6.85-inch LTPO AMOLED, 144Hz
6.9-inch LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz
Vivo – Faster refresh rate
Resolution
1440 x 3168 pixels
1200 x 2608 pixels
Vivo – Higher resolution and pixel density
Peak Brightness
4,400 nits
3,500 nits
Vivo – Higher advertised peak brightness
Protection
Armor Glass
Xiaomi Shield Glass 3.0
Vivo – Premium Armor Glass protection
Operating System
Android 17, OriginOS 7
Android 16, HyperOS 3
Vivo – Newer Android version
Software Updates
Up to 5 major OS updates
Not specified
Vivo – Explicit five-update commitment
Processor
Dimensity 9600 Pro (2nm)
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm)
Tie – Both are flagship-grade chipsets
GPU
Mali-G2-Ultra-NX
Adreno 840
Xiaomi – Strong flagship GPU platform
RAM
Up to 16GB
Up to 16GB
Tie – Same maximum RAM
Storage
Up to 1TB, UFS 4.1
Up to 1TB, UFS 4.1
Tie – Same storage technology and capacity
Main Camera
50MP, 1/1.28-inch, OIS
50MP, 1-inch-type, OIS
Xiaomi – Larger main camera sensor
Telephoto Camera
200MP periscope, 3.5x optical zoom
200MP periscope, 3.2–4.3x continuous optical zoom
Xiaomi – Continuous optical zoom
Ultrawide Camera
50MP, 119-degree FOV, AF
50MP, 115-degree FOV, AF
Vivo – Wider field of view
Camera Features
Zeiss optics, T* coating, laser AF
Leica lenses, zoom ring, TOF 3D sensor
Xiaomi – More specialised imaging hardware
Video Recording
Up to 8K@30fps, 4K@240fps
Up to 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps
Vivo – Higher maximum 4K frame rate
Selfie Camera
50MP, AF
50MP, AF
Tie – Similar front-camera hardware
Selfie Video
4K@60fps
4K@60fps
Tie – Same maximum resolution and frame rate
Battery
7,800mAh (Global)
6,000mAh
Vivo – Significantly larger battery
Wired Charging
90W
90W
Tie – Same charging wattage
Wireless Charging
40W
50W
Xiaomi – Faster wireless charging
Reverse Charging
Reverse wireless and wired
10W wireless, 22.5W wired
Vivo – More flexible reverse charging
Connectivity
Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4/6.0
Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0
Tie – Comparable connectivity
USB
USB-C 3.2
USB-C 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort
Xiaomi – DisplayPort support
Price / Value
Priced around $1,000 / ₹1,00,000
Priced around $1,300 / ₹1,30,000
Vivo – Lower price and stronger overall value
Overall Winner
Better display, battery and value
Better main camera and optical zoom
Vivo – More balanced flagship package
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
2. Design and Display
Build and Feel
The Vivo X500 Pro Max features a premium construction with Armor Glass protection, an aluminum frame and a choice of glass or glass-fiber reinforced plastic on the rear. Its IP68/IP69 certification provides protection against dust and water. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra also delivers a sophisticated design, combining an aluminum frame with a glass front and either a glass-fiber reinforced plastic or silicone polymer back. Its aerospace-grade glass fiber adds another premium touch, while its IP68/IP69 rating supports immersion up to 6 metres. Both phones offer flagship-grade durability, although Xiaomi provides better water resistance on paper. Vivo’s Armor Glass construction, however, gives it a distinctive appeal.
Display Quality
The Vivo X500 Pro Max features a 6.85-inch LTPO AMOLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate, 1440p resolution, Dolby Vision and HDR10+ support. Its advertised 4,400-nit peak brightness also promises excellent outdoor visibility. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra counters with a larger 6.9-inch LTPO AMOLED panel, 68 billion colours, Dolby Vision and HDR10+, alongside 3,500-nit peak brightness. However, its 120Hz refresh rate and 1200p resolution put it behind Vivo in sharpness and smoothness.
Verdict
The Vivo X500 Pro Max wins the display category with its sharper resolution, faster refresh rate and higher advertised peak brightness. Xiaomi remains an excellent alternative.
3. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Vivo X500 Pro Max runs on the 2nm MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro, featuring an octa-core CPU and Mali-G2-Ultra-NX GPU. It offers up to 16GB RAM and 1TB storage with UFS 4.1 technology. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra uses Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, paired with the Adreno 840 GPU, up to 16GB RAM and 1TB UFS 4.1 storage. Both processors belong to the flagship performance category, promising strong gaming, multitasking and AI capabilities. Xiaomi’s Snapdragon platform offers an established high-performance ecosystem, while Vivo’s newer 2nm chipset could deliver efficiency advantages. Software support also differs, with Vivo promising five major Android updates.
Battery and Charging
Battery capacity is another major difference. The Vivo X500 Pro Max packs a 7,800mAh battery in its global version, supported by 90W wired and 40W wireless charging. It also supports reverse wireless and wired charging. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra features a smaller 6,000mAh battery with 90W wired and 50W wireless charging, alongside reverse wired and wireless charging. Vivo clearly has the advantage for users prioritising endurance, while Xiaomi offers faster wireless charging. The larger battery makes Vivo particularly appealing for heavy users who spend extended periods gaming, streaming or travelling without convenient access to a charger.
Verdict
The Vivo X500 Pro Max takes the lead with its larger battery, newer manufacturing process and longer stated software support. Xiaomi offers stronger wireless charging flexibility.
4. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
The Vivo X500 Pro Max features a 50MP main camera with OIS, a 200MP periscope telephoto camera offering 3.5x optical zoom and a 50MP ultrawide lens. Zeiss optics, T* lens coating, laser autofocus and advanced video recording capabilities strengthen its photography package. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra also features a 50MP main camera, but its larger 1-inch-type sensor gives it a notable hardware advantage. Its 200MP periscope camera supports continuous optical zoom between 3.2x and 4.3x, while the 50MP ultrawide camera includes autofocus. Leica lenses, a dedicated zoom ring and a TOF 3D sensor further distinguish its camera system. Xiaomi looks particularly promising for photography enthusiasts seeking greater optical flexibility and sensor versatility.
Selfie Camera
Both smartphones feature 50MP autofocus selfie cameras with 4K video recording, making them well-equipped for video calls, social media content and high-resolution portraits. The Vivo X500 Pro Max offers an f/2.0 aperture and 20mm focal length, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra uses an f/2.2 aperture and 21mm focal length. Vivo supports HDR, whereas Xiaomi additionally includes panorama and gyro-EIS for improved video stability. Neither phone makes a dramatic departure from the other in front-camera hardware. However, Xiaomi’s additional stabilisation features make it slightly more versatile for users who frequently record themselves. Vivo’s wider aperture could also prove useful in challenging lighting conditions.
Verdict
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra gets the camera advantage with its larger main sensor, continuous optical zoom and Leica imaging system. Vivo remains a strong alternative for versatile photography.
5. Pricing
The Vivo X500 Pro Max is priced around $1,000 (₹1,00,000), positioning it as a slightly more affordable flagship. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is priced around $1,300 (₹1,30,000), placing it considerably higher in the premium smartphone segment. The difference is approximately $300 (₹30,000), which is significant for buyers comparing two high-end devices.
Vivo offers an attractive combination of display technology, battery capacity and camera hardware at a lower asking price. Xiaomi, meanwhile, commands a premium for its photography-focused hardware, larger main camera sensor and Leica collaboration. Both target enthusiasts, but their pricing creates distinctly different value propositions.
Verdict
The Vivo X500 Pro Max wins the pricing category with its lower asking price, larger battery, and excellent display. Xiaomi justifies its premium mainly through photography.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
6. Conclusion
The Vivo X500 Pro Max stands out with its 144Hz 1440p display, 7,800mAh global battery, 200MP periscope camera and 90W charging. Its 2nm Dimensity chipset and five major Android updates also strengthen its long-term appeal. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra counters with a 1-inch-type main camera sensor, continuous optical zoom, Leica lenses, a dedicated zoom ring and 50W wireless charging. Its aerospace-grade glass-fiber construction and enhanced water resistance add further distinction.
These unique features make the two phones appealing for different reasons. Xiaomi is clearly positioned as the more photography-centric flagship, while Vivo focuses on delivering a more balanced premium smartphone experience with fewer obvious compromises for everyday users.
Verdict
The Vivo X500 Pro Max is the overall winner for its superior display, significantly larger battery, competitive camera hardware, and lower price. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra remains the better choice for dedicated mobile photographers who prioritise its larger main sensor and Leica imaging capabilities. However, Vivo offers the more complete package for most flagship buyers, combining performance, endurance, display quality and value without compromising significantly on camera versatility.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
Xiaomi has launched the Smart Doorbell 4 Pro Dual Camera Edition in China for 499 yuan ($75), with an introductory price of 439 yuan ($66). It adds a secondary downward-facing camera to monitor packages alongside the main camera.
Xiaomi Smart Doorbell 4 Pro Dual Camera Specifications
The camera array consists of a 5MP primary sensor and a 2MP secondary sensor. Both lenses provide a diagonal field of view of over 150 degrees. The primary camera faces forward to capture people approaching the door and the general porch area, while the secondary camera is angled downward to cover the floor space.
For low-light recording, the device uses 940nm infrared LEDs. These specific infrared lights do not emit a visible red glow, which is intended to prevent the camera from being a nuisance to neighbors in shared apartment corridors.
The doorbell operates on a 9,800mAh battery. According to Xiaomi’s lab tests, this capacity provides about 172 days of use per charge, assuming the device records 20 ten-second, motion-triggered clips daily.
Motion detection relies on dual passive infrared (PIR) sensors that cover a 180-degree horizontal area and can detect movement up to five meters away. You can adjust the detection sensitivity and recording intervals within the Mi Home app.
On the software side, the doorbell features AI recognition for people, packages, and pets, as well as free cloud-based facial recognition. It also supports voice-changing calls, custom voice replies, and an automatic ambient light that turns on when someone approaches at night.
For video storage, the device accepts microSD cards up to 256GB and includes 72 hours of free rolling cloud storage. Data transmission is secured with AES-128 encryption and a dedicated Mi Home security chip.
The doorbell integrates heavily into Xiaomi’s ecosystem. It supports Xiaomi HyperConnect for viewing live feeds on compatible Xiaomi TVs and smart displays, alongside XiaoAI voice commands for checking battery levels or pulling up the camera feed. The hardware mounts via a 3M adhesive pad or screws and includes a tamper alarm that sounds a siren, records video, and sends a phone alert if someone tries to pry it off the wall.
Samsung is reportedly bringing the under-display camera back to its book-style foldables. A tipster on X says the company will unveil a device with the technology next year.
Interestingly, Samsung has included an under-display camera in its foldables since the Z Fold 3, but it switched to a punch-hole cutout on the Z Fold 7 and Z Fold 8 series. Now, just two years after making the switch, the brand is rumored to be bringing the feature back. The timing may be significant.
Apple recently launched the iPhone Duo with an inner selfie camera under the screen, and it seems Samsung wants to show it can do the same.
It’s coming next year. I’m calling it a year ahead of everyone else: Samsung will unveil a device with UDC, major internal changes, and minimal changes to its overall thickness and design. https://t.co/wxJ6XigTAa
The tipster says the device will also get major internal changes. However, its thickness and overall design will reportedly remain largely unchanged, measuring 3.9mm when open and 7.9mm when closed.
Why Samsung walked away from it
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 launched in 2021 with an under-display camera, and every Fold model through the Galaxy Z Fold 6 kept it. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 switched to a regular punch-hole camera in 2025, likely to improve photo quality. The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and the wide Galaxy Z Fold 8 also kept the punch-hole design this year.
Apple’s version has not escaped the same problem. The iPhone Duo’s inner camera takes weaker photos than the outer one, which is why Apple specifically calls it a “FaceTime camera.”
That’s the trade-off for Samsung, too. An under-display camera gives the inner screen a cleaner look without a cutout, but selfie quality takes a hit. The report doesn’t say whether Samsung has found a way to address the problem.
For more daily updates, please visit ourNews Section.
Redmi K80 Pro and OnePlus Ace 7 Pro present an interesting comparison between an older flagship and a much newer performance-focused smartphone. Launched in November 2024, the Redmi is now almost two years old, while the OnePlus brings 2026 flagship hardware. With a considerable difference in their prices, the question is whether the newer OnePlus offers enough improvements to justify an upgrade.
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
2. Design and Display
Build and Feel
The Redmi K80 Pro features a premium glass-and-metal construction with IP68 dust and water resistance. Its understated design, ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, and stereo speakers deliver a conventional flagship experience. Despite being an older model, its build quality remains competitive. The OnePlus Ace 7 Pro takes a more specialised approach with Crystal Shield Glass, an aluminium frame, and IP68/IP69K protection.
OnePlus also incorporates a built-in bi-directional cooling fan, giving the phone a distinctive gaming-oriented identity. Both devices offer premium construction, but the OnePlus provides better water-resistance certification and additional cooling hardware. Redmi, meanwhile, feels more like a traditional all-round flagship. The OnePlus is more appealing to gaming enthusiasts, although its specialised design may not matter much to everyday users.
Display Quality
The Redmi K80 Pro features a 6.67-inch OLED display with 2K resolution, a 120Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision, and HDR10+ support. Its advertised peak brightness reaches 3,200 nits, giving it an advantage for outdoor visibility and HDR content. The OnePlus Ace 7 Pro features a larger 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED panel with 1.5K resolution and an impressive 185Hz refresh rate.
OnePlus also supports HDR10+, HDR Vivid, and 3840Hz PWM dimming. Its adaptive refresh technology offers smoother visuals and better refresh-rate flexibility, particularly during gaming. However, Redmi delivers sharper images and higher advertised peak brightness. The OnePlus display is better suited to competitive gaming, but Redmi remains the stronger option for video streaming and overall visual clarity.
Verdict
Redmi wins on resolution, brightness, and HDR viewing, while OnePlus offers a faster adaptive display. Redmi delivers better overall display quality despite its older hardware.
3. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Redmi K80 Pro runs on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, paired with the Adreno 830 GPU and UFS 4.0 storage. Although almost two years old, this combination remains capable of handling demanding applications, multitasking, and modern mobile games. However, the OnePlus Ace 7 Pro features the newer Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840 GPU, and faster UFS 4.1 storage.
The newer chipset gives OnePlus a clear advantage in processing power and graphics performance. It also features a built-in bi-directional cooling fan designed to manage temperatures during extended gaming sessions. Redmi remains sufficiently powerful for everyday flagship usage, but its older platform cannot match the OnePlus hardware advantage. For users who prioritise demanding games, sustained performance, and longer-term hardware relevance, OnePlus is the more compelling choice.
Battery and Charging
The OnePlus Ace 7 Pro features a massive 9,000mAh silicon-carbon battery, considerably larger than the Redmi K80 Pro’s 6,000mAh unit. This gives OnePlus a substantial advantage for extended gaming, streaming, and heavy daily usage. It supports 100W wired charging, alongside bypass charging, which helps reduce battery stress during supported gaming sessions by supplying power directly to the phone.
Redmi counters with faster 120W wired charging, reaching a full charge in approximately 28 minutes, and adds 50W wireless charging. This makes it more flexible for users who prefer convenient charging options. However, the OnePlus combination of a much larger battery and bypass charging is particularly attractive for heavy users. Redmi charges faster and offers wireless charging, but OnePlus delivers better battery endurance.
Verdict
OnePlus wins with its larger battery, newer chipset, and bypass charging. Redmi offers faster wired and wireless charging, but OnePlus is better suited to heavy users and gamers.
4. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
The Redmi K80 Pro features a triple-camera setup with a 50MP main sensor with OIS, a 50MP telephoto camera offering 2.5x optical zoom, and a 32MP ultrawide lens. This combination provides greater flexibility for portraits, landscapes, and everyday photography. The OnePlus Ace 7 Pro uses a 200MP primary camera with OIS and a 50MP periscope telephoto lens offering 3.5x optical zoom.
The OnePlus offers higher primary-camera resolution and longer optical zoom, potentially benefiting detailed photography and distant subjects. However, the absence of a dedicated ultrawide camera is a significant compromise. Redmi provides a more complete camera system, particularly for users who frequently switch between different photography styles. While OnePlus has impressive individual camera specifications, Redmi offers greater versatility for everyday photography.
For selfies, the Redmi K80 Pro features a 20MP front camera with HDR support, while the OnePlus Ace 7 Pro uses a 16MP sensor with panorama functionality. Redmi also supports 1080p video recording at 60fps, compared with the OnePlus camera’s 30fps limit. These differences give Redmi an advantage in front-camera specifications.
Neither smartphone offers particularly advanced selfie hardware compared with dedicated camera-focused flagships. However, Redmi’s higher-resolution sensor and HDR support make it more appealing for casual selfies, video calls, and social media content. OnePlus concentrates more of its camera hardware on the rear setup, particularly its high-resolution primary sensor and periscope zoom. For users who regularly use the front camera, Redmi is the more practical option.
Verdict
Redmi wins the camera category with its dedicated ultrawide lens, versatile telephoto setup, and better selfie specifications. OnePlus offers impressive zoom capabilities but sacrifices overall versatility.
5. Pricing
The Redmi K80 Pro is priced around $500 (approximately ₹45,000), reflecting its older generation and revised market positioning. Originally launched in China on November 27, 2024, it is now almost two years old. The OnePlus Ace 7 Pro is priced around $770 (approximately ₹69,000), based on its estimated Chinese-market pricing and approximate conversion.
This creates a price difference of approximately $270 (₹24,000). Redmi offers a considerably more affordable entry into flagship hardware, with a high-resolution display, versatile cameras, and wireless charging. OnePlus commands a premium through its newer processor, gaming-focused cooling system, larger battery, and advanced charging features. The price difference is significant, particularly for buyers who do not need the latest performance hardware.
Redmi offers better affordability and value for everyday users, while OnePlus justifies its premium with newer hardware. The choice depends on performance requirements and budget.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
6. Conclusion
The Redmi K80 Pro retains several advantages despite its age. Its 2K OLED display, Dolby Vision support, dedicated ultrawide camera, 50W wireless charging, and ultrasonic fingerprint sensor make it a well-rounded flagship. The OnePlus Ace 7 Pro, however, introduces more specialised hardware, including the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 185Hz LTPO AMOLED display, built-in cooling fan, 9,000mAh battery, and bypass charging.
These differences highlight the generational gap between the two smartphones. Redmi remains attractive for photography, entertainment, and buyers seeking premium features at a lower price. OnePlus is better equipped for demanding games, extended usage, and users who want newer flagship hardware. Although the older Redmi still competes in several categories, the OnePlus offers more meaningful improvements in performance and endurance.
Verdict
OnePlus Ace 7 Pro is the overall winner. Its newer processor, dedicated cooling system, larger battery, and gaming capabilities make it the stronger smartphone in 2026. However, the Redmi K80 Pro remains a sensible alternative for budget-conscious buyers who value camera versatility, display quality, and wireless charging.
At a significantly lower price, Redmi still delivers an impressive flagship experience, but OnePlus is the better choice for those willing to pay extra for newer hardware and stronger long-term performance.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
Indian brand Karbonn is preparing to return to the smartphone market with two new phones in the country. The company has listed both the Karbonn Rebel 5G and Karbonn Rebel Pro on Amazon India, spilling some details. However, neither page reveals the price or launch date yet.
Karbonn last launched the Karbonn X21 in 2021 and has remained quiet on smartphones since then. These two models will show how the brand plans to come back.
How the two Karbonn phones differ
The Karbonn Rebel 5G packs a 7,000mAh battery, while the Rebel Pro has a smaller 6,000mAh unit. In terms of charging, the Pro supports 20W compared to 18W on the Rebel 5G. Both phones come with a charger and a USB Type-C cable in the box, along with a 3.5mm headphone jack.
The displays are similar in size, with both phones settling on HD+ panels. The Rebel 5G has a 6.75-inch screen with a peak brightness of 650 nits, while the Rebel Pro has a slightly smaller 6.7-inch display that reaches 720 nits. The Pro also has a 120Hz refresh rate.
Both models run Android 16, and Karbonn says they come without bloatware or pre-installed third-party apps. You can also expect two years of Android and two years of security patch updates.
Fortunately, you can tell the two phones apart from the looks themselves. The Rebel 5G has a horizontal rectangular camera module, while the Rebel Pro gets a vertically arranged module. Both house the camera sensors and an LED flash.
Karbonn will sell the Rebel 5G in Blue, Gold and Silver. Meanwhile, the Rebel Pro comes in Blue, Burgundy, Gold and Grey.
What is still missing
Karbonn hasn’t revealed the chipset, RAM, storage capacity, or camera resolutions for either phone. Those details will be important in figuring out where the two models sit in the market, particularly with their prices still unknown.
For more daily updates, please visit ourNews Section.
Casio is adding a new set of watches to its lineup this November with the release of the LOV-26A-1 Seasonal Pair Collection. Created in collaboration with graphic artist Verdy and his streetwear label Girls Don’t Cry, the release marks the 30th anniversary of Casio’s annual paired watch series. The two-watch set is priced at ￥38,500 ($244) in Japan, with a wider global release expected soon based on its current listing on Casio’s international website.
Design Details
The hardware is based on two of Casio’s most recognizable digital watch silhouettes. The G-Shock model uses the DW-5600 as its foundation, while the smaller Baby-G is built on the BGD-565 chassis. Both feature a predominantly black resin construction, though Casio notes the G-Shock specifically uses a bio-based resin for its case and band to reduce environmental impact.
Instead of loud, oversized branding, the design changes are relatively subtle. The Girls Don’t Cry logo is printed directly on both watch faces. On the G-Shock’s band, the logo pattern is applied using a glossy black ink that blends into the matte black strap for a monochromatic look.
The Baby-G takes a slightly more visible approach, using matte white ink for the band pattern. Both models also share a distinct physical design quirk: a small, heart-shaped cutout on the band loop.
Casio has customized the LED backlights and the stainless steel case backs for this release. Pressing the illumination button reveals a butterfly graphic on the LCD panel, pink on the G-Shock and green on the Baby-G.
On the reverse side, the watches feature engravings of Verdy’s original characters, with a Devil on the G-Shock and an Angel on the Baby-G. This is a direct nod to the angel and devil motifs that Casio has traditionally used on its Pair Collection models since 1996.
Internally, these operate as standard Casio digital watches. The G-Shock (48.9 x 42.8 x 13.4 mm, 52g) includes 200-meter water resistance and runs for about five years on a CR2016 battery.
The Baby-G (42.1 x 37.9 x 11.3 mm, 30g) is rated for 100-meter water resistance and gets roughly three years from a CR1616 battery. Both include standard features like a 1/100-second stopwatch, a countdown timer, multi-function alarms, and flash alerts.
The set ships in custom packaging consisting of two black pouches that can snap together back-to-back, finished with gold-colored heart zipper charms.
The iPad mini 8 has a 4,900 mAh battery. The figure comes from the EU energy label Apple has published for the tablet. It is 134 mAh smaller than the 5,034 mAh battery in the iPad mini 7.
Apple’s spec sheet also lists the battery in watt-hours. The iPad mini 8 is rated at 18.9 Wh. The iPad mini 7 is rated at 19.3 Wh. That is 0.4 Wh less. It works out to about 2%.
You are not going to notice a 2% difference on its own. A cut this small rarely changes how long a tablet lasts in a day. It’s thinner in its credit. The new iPad mini measures 5.4 mm against 6.3 mm for the iPad mini 7.
As for specs, you get an 8.5-inch OLED display and the A20 Pro chip. The tablet also gets IP67 water and dust resistance. Apple says the A20 Pro is up to 60% faster on the CPU than the A17 Pro in the iPad mini 7.
Pre-orders for the iPad mini are already open, with shipping beginning November 6. The Wi-Fi model starts at $699. That is $200 more than the iPad mini 7 cost at launch in October 2024.
Apple files EU energy labels for tablets sold in the region. They often list battery details that Apple leaves off its product pages. Here, the label gives you the first look at how big the battery is.
RedMagic 12 Pro+ and OnePlus 16 target premium smartphone buyers, but their priorities are noticeably different. Both feature Qualcomm’s latest flagship chipset, high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays and large silicon-carbon batteries. However, one is built around dedicated gaming hardware, while the other offers a more versatile flagship experience. The comparison comes down to whether gaming performance or everyday versatility matters more.
Tie – Both run Android 17 with different interfaces
Connectivity
Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, NFC, IR
Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, NFC, IR
Tie – Similar connectivity
USB
USB 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort
USB 3.2, OTG
RedMagic – Faster specified USB standard
Audio
Stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos, Snapdragon Sound
Stereo speakers, Hi-Res audio
RedMagic – Dolby Atmos support
Price
$1,000 / ₹1,00,000
$900 / ₹86,000
OnePlus – More affordable
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
2. Design and Display
Build and Feel
The RedMagic 12 Pro+ features a glass body with Gorilla Glass 7i protection, an aviation-grade aluminum frame and pressure-sensitive gaming zones with 700Hz touch sensing. Its built-in cooling fan reinforces its gaming-focused identity, making it particularly appealing to enthusiasts. The OnePlus 16 takes a more conventional premium approach with Crystal Shield Glass, an aluminum frame and a choice of glass or glass-fiber reinforced plastic back. It also offers broader SIM flexibility with eSIM support in select configurations. Both phones have IP68/IP69 protection, although the RedMagic additionally lists IPX8 protection alongside its cooling system. The OnePlus feels more suited to mainstream flagship buyers, while RedMagic prioritizes gaming functionality.
Display Quality
Both smartphones feature 185Hz AMOLED displays, delivering exceptionally smooth scrolling, responsive gaming and fluid animations. However, their display technologies differ. The RedMagic 12 Pro+ offers a larger 6.85-inch panel with 1,900 nits of HBM brightness and 5,000 nits peak brightness. The OnePlus 16 features a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display with Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid and Ultra HDR image support. Its 3,840Hz PWM dimming also offers an additional advantage for users sensitive to screen flickering. RedMagic delivers impressive brightness and screen real estate, but OnePlus offers a more comprehensive HDR experience.
Verdict
RedMagic wins on screen size and peak brightness, while OnePlus offers better display versatility with LTPO technology, broader HDR support and high-frequency PWM dimming.
3. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
Both smartphones use the Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 chipset, built on a 2nm process, alongside the Adreno 850 GPU. Their identical CPU configurations suggest comparable raw processing capabilities for demanding applications, multitasking and high-end gaming. However, the RedMagic 12 Pro+ has a dedicated cooling fan designed to manage heat during extended gaming sessions. Its pressure-sensitive gaming zones further improve the experience for competitive players. The OnePlus 16 relies on a conventional flagship design but benefits from OxygenOS 17, which provides a more mainstream software experience. Both offer up to 16GB RAM and 1TB storage, although OnePlus uses standard UFS 4.1 while RedMagic features UFS 4.1 Pro. RedMagic has the more convincing gaming hardware, whereas OnePlus offers a better-rounded everyday package.
Battery and Charging
Battery capacity is impressive on both devices. The OnePlus 16 packs a larger 9,000mAh silicon-carbon battery, compared with the RedMagic 12 Pro+’s 8,400mAh unit. Charging speeds favour RedMagic, with 120W wired and 80W wireless charging. OnePlus offers 100W wired and 50W wireless charging, alongside reverse wireless charging, 5W reverse wired charging and bypass charging. Its support for multiple charging standards, including PPS and UFCS, also adds flexibility. RedMagic should appeal to buyers who prioritise faster charging, while OnePlus offers greater battery capacity and useful charging features. Both are well-equipped for extended use, although actual endurance will depend on gaming intensity and everyday usage.
Verdict
OnePlus wins on battery capacity and charging flexibility, while RedMagic offers faster wired and wireless charging alongside dedicated cooling for demanding gaming sessions.
4. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
The OnePlus 16 has a clear advantage in camera versatility. Its triple-camera system combines a 200MP primary sensor with a 50MP telephoto camera offering 3x optical zoom and a 50MP ultrawide lens. Optical image stabilisation on the primary and telephoto cameras should help capture sharper photos, while laser autofocus and a colour spectrum sensor add useful imaging capabilities. The RedMagic 12 Pro+ takes a simpler approach with a 50MP primary camera featuring OIS and a 50MP autofocus ultrawide sensor. Its auxiliary lens provides additional hardware, but the absence of a dedicated telephoto camera limits its flexibility for distant subjects. Both support 8K video recording at 30fps. However, OnePlus goes further with 4K recording at 120fps, Dolby Vision, HDR and gyro-EIS. For photography enthusiasts, OnePlus is considerably better equipped.
The difference becomes even more noticeable with the front cameras. The RedMagic 12 Pro+ features a 16MP under-display selfie camera, allowing it to maintain a cleaner, uninterrupted screen appearance. However, under-display technology generally involves compromises in image clarity and detail. The OnePlus 16 instead features a 50MP ultrawide selfie camera with autofocus, HDR and panorama support. It also supports 4K video recording at 30fps and 60fps, alongside gyro-EIS and HDR. This makes it considerably more appealing for video calls, group selfies, social media content and vlogging. RedMagic prioritises an immersive gaming display, but OnePlus clearly focuses more on front-camera quality and versatility. For users who frequently capture selfies or record videos, the OnePlus 16 is the more practical choice.
Verdict
OnePlus wins decisively with its 200MP main camera, dedicated telephoto lens, advanced video recording and higher-resolution autofocus selfie camera.
5. Pricing
The RedMagic 12 Pro+ is priced around $1,000 (₹1,00,000), positioning it firmly in the premium flagship segment. The OnePlus 16 is priced around $900 (₹86,000), making it approximately $100 more affordable. Despite the price difference, both smartphones offer the same flagship chipset, 185Hz displays and up to 16GB RAM with 1TB storage.
RedMagic justifies its higher asking price with dedicated gaming hardware, a built-in cooling fan and faster charging technology. OnePlus counters with a more versatile camera system, a larger battery and additional charging capabilities. The difference in pricing makes the OnePlus particularly attractive to buyers who want flagship specifications without paying extra for specialised gaming features.
Verdict
OnePlus offers better overall value for money, combining stronger cameras, a larger battery and flagship performance at a more accessible price.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
6. Conclusion
The RedMagic 12 Pro+ stands out with its built-in cooling fan, 700Hz pressure-sensitive gaming zones, gaming-oriented software and 80W wireless charging. These features make it particularly interesting for competitive mobile gamers who spend extended periods playing demanding titles.
The OnePlus 16 takes a broader approach with a 200MP primary camera, 3x optical zoom, 50MP ultrawide selfie camera, Dolby Vision video recording and a larger 9,000mAh battery. Its LTPO display, wider charging compatibility and more versatile imaging system also make it suitable for different types of users.
Both smartphones deliver excellent flagship performance, but their hardware priorities are fundamentally different. RedMagic is a specialised gaming device, whereas OnePlus offers a more balanced combination of entertainment, photography, productivity and everyday usability.
Verdict
OnePlus 16 is the overall winner. Its superior camera system, larger battery, versatile display and lower price make it the more complete flagship. However, dedicated mobile gamers should consider the RedMagic 12 Pro+ for its built-in cooling fan, gaming controls and faster charging capabilities.
RedMagic 12 Pro+ offers better sustained gaming potential with its built-in cooling fan and pressure-sensitive gaming controls.
2. Which phone takes better photos?
OnePlus 16 offers better camera versatility with its 200MP main sensor, 3x optical zoom and 50MP ultrawide camera.
3. Which phone has better battery life?
OnePlus 16 has a larger 9,000mAh battery, giving it an advantage in potential battery endurance.
4. Is OnePlus 16 worth buying over RedMagic 12 Pro+?
Yes. Its stronger cameras, larger battery and lower price make it a more versatile purchase.
5. Which phone offers better value for money?
OnePlus 16 offers better value for most buyers, while RedMagic suits dedicated mobile gamers.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
I have reviewed quite a few projectors over the years, including portable models and larger 4K home theater projectors. However, the Aurzen ZIP Pro is unlike anything I have used before. While conventional portable projectors are relatively compact, the ZIP Pro takes portability to another level. It is a truly pocket-sized projector that you can easily carry around almost anywhere.
I was already familiar with the original Aurzen ZIP from my earlier coverage, and I knew it was an incredibly compact projector. However, I never had the opportunity to test it myself. Recently, I received the ZIP Pro for review, and I was genuinely surprised by just how small it was. Its unusual tri-fold design makes it even more interesting, and the fact that a projector can comfortably fit inside a pocket is quite remarkable.
To be honest, I was initially skeptical about how useful such a tiny projector could actually be. After all, it is difficult to imagine getting a proper big-screen experience from something this small.
However, after spending around two weeks with the ZIP Pro, my perspective changed quite a bit. I genuinely enjoyed having this little projector around. Its compact design, convenient setup, and surprisingly capable performance made it much more practical than I initially expected.
Of course, it has its limitations, but the overall experience turned out to be quite enjoyable. Let me share what I liked about the Aurzen ZIP Pro and where I think it could have been better.
Design and Build Quality
The Aurzen ZIP Pro retains the distinctive tri-fold design of the original ZIP, which is easily one of its biggest selling points. The projector measures just 115 x 97 x 44 mm when folded, making it compact enough to fit inside a pocket or a small bag.
The upper section features a semi-transparent black finish that gives the projector a premium appearance. I particularly liked this design choice, as it makes the ZIP Pro look quite different from conventional projectors. The overall build quality feels really solid, and the folding mechanism is sturdy enough to hold the projector at different angles.
Aurzen officially lists the weight at 586 grams, although my digital scale showed approximately 593 grams. It is considerably heavier than the original ZIP, which weighs just 280 grams. However, I did not find the additional weight particularly inconvenient, especially considering how compact the device is.
What I liked most about the design is that the folding mechanism also works as an adjustable stand. I could simply place the projector on a table, unfold it, and adjust the projection angle without needing a separate tripod. It also makes ceiling projection incredibly convenient, particularly when watching movies or YouTube videos while lying in bed.
The ZIP Pro also features a small smart touchscreen display for accessing settings, adjusting controls, and checking device information.
Picture Quality and Projection Performance
The Aurzen ZIP Pro uses native 1080p DLP projection technology powered by a Texas Instruments DMD chip, paired with an ultra-slim 10.7 mm optical engine and LED light source.
It delivers 200 lumens of brightness, a 300:1 contrast ratio, and 85% NTSC color gamut coverage.
These are meaningful upgrades over the original ZIP, which features a 720p resolution and 100-lumen brightness.
Picture quality was one of my biggest concerns before testing the projector. Fortunately, the ZIP Pro performed better than I expected, particularly in darker environments.
The projected image looked sharp, with good detail in movies and YouTube videos. Colors appeared reasonably vibrant, while the improved resolution made text and smaller objects noticeably clearer.
Brightness is still limited compared with larger home theater projectors. The picture loses contrast and vibrancy in brightly lit environments, but I found it surprisingly watchable in a semi-dark room. I did not always need complete darkness to enjoy the experience.
The ZIP Pro features a 1.2:1 throw ratio and supports projection distances between 0.5 and 3 meters. Aurzen recommends screen sizes between 50 and 80 inches.
During my testing, I achieved approximately a 60-inch screen from 1.7 meters and a 75-inch screen from 2 meters. The image stayed sharp at both sizes, though the smaller projection felt slightly brighter.
The projector also gets noticeably brighter when connected to an external power source.
The ZIP Pro is not intended to replace a dedicated home theater projector, but its picture quality is impressive considering how compact it is.
Autofocus and Keystone Correction
The ZIP Pro features zero-lag autofocus and four-point keystone correction.
During my testing, the projector typically adjusted focus within approximately one second after I changed its position. The process was quick and reliable, and I rarely needed to make manual adjustments. This made switching between different projection angles much more convenient.
The four-point keystone correction also worked well in most situations. There is also a dedicated button on the touchscreen that allows you to quickly correct the image alignment. If the projected image looks distorted or does not form a proper rectangle, tapping this button automatically adjusts it. I found this particularly useful when changing the projector’s position.
However, when I tilted the projector too far upward toward a wall, I occasionally encountered an Out of Keystone Range warning. This was not something I experienced frequently, but it is worth keeping in mind when positioning the projector at extreme angles.
Ceiling projection also worked really well. I just tilted it upward, and it projected perfectly with no issues.
To be honest, I was quite impressed with how well the autofocus and keystone correction worked together. Combined with the flexible tri-fold design, these features make the ZIP Pro incredibly convenient to set up and use in different locations.
Connectivity, Software and Gaming
The Aurzen ZIP Pro runs a Linux-based screen mirroring system and supports dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.4, AirLink, Miracast, AirPlay P2P, DLNA, and Google Cast.
Aurzen has also added USB-C video input through DisplayPort Alt Mode, which is missing from the original ZIP. This allows compatible laptops, smartphones, and handheld gaming devices to connect directly to the projector.
I primarily used my iPhone for wireless screen mirroring, and the overall experience was smooth. I watched YouTube videos, Instagram Reels, and other content without experiencing any connection issues. The setup was straightforward, and I could easily mirror my phone’s screen without dealing with cables or complicated configurations.
However, there is one limitation worth mentioning. You cannot directly cast content from streaming platforms like Netflix and Hulu through wireless screen mirroring due to DRM restrictions. The good news is that you can still watch content from these platforms by connecting a compatible laptop to the projector through USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode. This is a useful workaround, although it takes away some of the convenience of wireless streaming.
dark roomambient lights on
I also tested the projector’s gaming capabilities. I connected my laptop to the ZIP Pro through its USB-C port using DisplayPort Alt Mode and played Far Cry 4 on the projected screen. The experience was surprisingly smooth, and I did not notice any input lag or latency issues during gameplay. I could comfortably play the game on a much larger screen without running into any problems.
Apart from PC gaming, I also tried playing retro games using emulators on my iPhone. Since I was already mirroring my phone’s screen wirelessly, I could simply launch the games and play using a controller. This turned out to be one of the more enjoyable experiences during my testing. Playing retro games on a large projected screen without connecting additional cables made the whole experience convenient and hassle-free.
The ZIP Pro comes with two USB-C ports, one for charging and S/PDIF audio and another for video input.
The touchscreen interface is useful for basic operations, but typing passwords on such a small display can be frustrating. Fortunately, the AurzenHub companion app offers remote-control functionality, which I found considerably more convenient.
The ZIP Pro features dual 2W stereo speakers, an upgrade over the dual 1W speakers on the original ZIP.
I was not expecting much from the audio system, considering the limited space available inside the projector. However, the speakers turned out to be surprisingly capable.
Dialogue sounded crisp and clear, while vocals and background audio had decent separation. The overall sound quality was noticeably better than my smartphone speakers.
The speakers cannot deliver deep bass or room-filling audio, but they are perfectly adequate for casual movie watching and YouTube playback. I rarely felt the need to connect an external speaker during my testing.
The ZIP Pro also supports Bluetooth 5.4 and simultaneous connections to two Bluetooth headphones. This is a useful addition for watching movies privately with another person.
Battery Life and Charging
The Aurzen ZIP Pro comes with a 10,000mAh battery rated at 38Wh and supports 65W USB-C PD fast charging. This is a substantial upgrade over the original ZIP, which features a 5,000mAh battery and 24W charging.
Aurzen claims up to 2.5 hours of playback in Eco mode, and I am happy to report that the projector actually lives up to this claim. During my testing, I managed to get around 2.5 hours of playback in Eco mode without any issues. Interestingly, I also achieved approximately 2.5 hours of playback in Normal mode, which was a pleasant surprise.
Eco mode reduces brightness to conserve power, but I generally preferred Normal mode for its better picture quality. Considering the projector’s compact size, I found the battery life quite satisfactory, especially since it delivered results that matched the manufacturer’s claims.
Thermals and Fan Noise
The ZIP Pro features an active cooling system, with Aurzen claiming operating noise levels of 24dB in Eco mode, 28dB in Normal mode, and 35dB in Conference mode.
Fan noise was barely noticeable from my usual viewing distance. I could hear it when sitting close to the projector, but it never became particularly distracting during video playback.
The projector does get warm during extended use. In Eco mode, I recorded surface temperatures of approximately 38-40°C, while areas near the ventilation openings reached around 45°C.
The heat was mostly concentrated near the vents, and I did not experience any overheating issues during my testing.
Should You Buy the Aurzen ZIP Pro?
When I first received the Aurzen ZIP Pro, I was quite skeptical about how useful such a tiny projector could actually be. With just 200 lumens of brightness, I was not expecting much in terms of picture quality, and I was not entirely convinced about its practical use cases either.
However, after spending around two weeks with it, my opinion changed quite a bit. I genuinely enjoyed using this little projector, and I started to appreciate what Aurzen was trying to achieve with its unusual design.
What makes the ZIP Pro interesting is not necessarily its specifications, but the convenience it offers. You can literally carry it in your pocket and enjoy a big-screen experience almost anywhere.
I found it particularly enjoyable for bedroom viewing and casual gaming, especially when playing retro games on a larger screen. I can also see it being a great companion for travelers and campers who want some entertainment without carrying a bulky projector.
Of course, pricing is something worth considering. The ZIP Pro is listed at $629.99, with a discounted price of $579.99. At this price, it competes with several portable projectors that offer significantly higher brightness and potentially better picture quality.
However, I do not think those projectors are necessarily direct alternatives. The ZIP Pro stands out because of its pocket-friendly design and the flexibility it offers, something that conventional portable projectors cannot always match.
After using it for two weeks, I think the ZIP Pro makes the most sense for people who prioritize portability and convenience over sheer brightness or picture quality. It is certainly not meant to replace a dedicated home theater projector, but for someone who wants a hassle-free big-screen experience on the go, it is definitely worth considering.
I started this review wondering whether a projector this small could actually be useful, but I ended up enjoying it far more than I expected. The Aurzen ZIP Pro is a rather unique gadget that proves a big-screen experience does not necessarily require a big projector.
Pricing and Availability
You can purchase the Aurzen ZIP Pro from the official Aurzen website for $579.99. It is also available in two bundles: the ZIP Pro + CastPlay Pro Bundle for $649.99 and the ZIP Pro Basquiat Special Edition Bundle for $679.99.
Honor has opened pre-orders for the Honor Win 2 Delta Force Professional League Edition in China. It’s a special version of its Honor Win 2 gaming phone made in collaboration with the Delta Force Professional League.
Although the pre-orders start today, the sale won’t begin until almost a month later, on November 27.
The Delta Force Edition comes in a sole 16/512GB variant; however, the company hasn’t announced the price yet. The phone has a green back panel with Delta Force artwork, while the Honor logo and the Delta Force Fiery Professional League logo sit at the top.
This isn’t Honor’s first collaboration with the tournament. The company previously teased a connection between its Honor WIN gaming laptop and the league, as covered in our earlier report. In July, Honor also announced a Delta Force edition of its WIN H9 gaming laptop.
What the regular Honor Win 2 offers
As for the specs, the device is powered by a 2nm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 chip, with CPU clock speeds reaching 5.01GHz. The phone has a 2K display with a 185Hz refresh rate and 0.93mm bezels. Honor calls it a dual-core Oasis screen, while there’s also a Win Touch chip to handle touch input.
Honor also equips the Win 2 with a dual-fan cooling system to manage heat during gaming. Despite the built-in cooling hardware, the phone carries IP68, IP69, and IP69K ratings for dust and water resistance. Its frame is made of matte metal.
The highlight of the Honor Win 2 is undoubtedly its 10,100mAh battery, which supports 100W wired and 80W wireless charging. Other features include a USB 3.2 port and the WIN energy ring, which supports more than 40 lighting effects for games.
Honor hasn’t revealed how much the Delta Force Professional League Edition will cost. We’ll keep you posted when the company reveals it.
OnePlus has quietly unveiled the OnePlus Buds Pro 4. Listed on the company’s official global website, the new premium earbuds bring upgraded audio capabilities, intelligent noise cancellation, and several AI-powered features. The listing also reveals their design, color options, and battery performance ahead of an official launch announcement.
OnePlus Buds Pro 4 specifications and features
The OnePlus Buds Pro 4 feature a dual-driver acoustic system comprising an 11mm composite woofer and a 6mm planar tweeter, with independent DACs powering each driver. Developed in collaboration with Dynaudio, the setup promises 50% stronger bass output than the previous generation. The earbuds support Hi-Res Audio with LHDC 5.0, offering 24-bit/192kHz audio transmission at up to 1Mbps. Spatial Audio with head tracking and personalized Golden Sound tuning are also included.
Noise cancellation is another major highlight, with OnePlus claiming twice the noise reduction compared to the Buds Pro 3. The adaptive ANC automatically adjusts according to surrounding conditions, while the three microphones and bone-conduction VPU sensor help improve call clarity.
Battery life reaches 53 hours with the charging case and ANC disabled, dropping to 26 hours with ANC enabled using AAC. The earbuds alone offer up to 13 hours of playback without ANC. A 10-minute charge provides up to 14 hours of listening time, and the case supports wireless charging.
The earbuds also carry an IP55 rating, while the charging case is not water-resistant. Other features include AI Live Translation, Dolby-powered Clear Audio Recording, Google Gemini voice access, dual-device connectivity, and Neck Health monitoring. Gaming latency can drop to 39ms with compatible OnePlus phones.
OnePlus Buds Pro 4 price and availability
OnePlus has listed the earbuds in Titanium Shadow and Polar White color options. However, the company has not announced their pricing, official launch date, or the markets where they will be available. It remains unclear whether the new model will reach India, Europe, or other global markets.
Interestingly, the Buds Pro 4 share several hardware and software characteristics with the recently introduced Oppo Enco X4, suggesting that they could be a rebranded version with some differences. The Enco X4 costs 219 euros in Europe. If OnePlus introduces its new earbuds in the region, they could carry similar pricing. More details should emerge once OnePlus officially announces their availability.
Oppo is preparing to introduce a new tablet in its home market. The upcoming Oppo Pad Air 6 has now appeared in a major certification database. Its arrival is also expected to bring a notable connectivity upgrade to the Air series.
Oppo Pad Air 6 5G clears 3C certification
China’s 3C certification database has listed four upcoming Oppo tablets carrying the model numbers OPD2611, OPD2603, OPD2614, and OPD2613. Among these devices, the OPD2614 stands out because its listing explicitly mentions 5G connectivity, making it the likely candidate for the Oppo Pad Air 6 5G. The OPD2611 supports 4G, while the OPD2603 and OPD2613 appear to be Wi-Fi-only models.
The certification also reveals different charging configurations across the four tablets. The OPD2611 and OPD2603 support charging at up to 45W, based on their listed 5-11V/4.1A ratings. Meanwhile, the OPD2614 and OPD2613 are rated for up to 33W charging with a maximum output of 5-11V/3A. The listings mention VCB4JBCH and VCB4HACH power adapters. If the OPD2614 indeed launches as the Pad Air 6 5G, buyers can expect cellular connectivity alongside conventional Wi-Fi access.
Oppo Pad Air 6 launch confirmed for November
Oppo Reno series spokesperson Zhang Ruoxing has confirmed on Weibo that the Pad Air 6 will debut alongside the Reno 17 series in November. The announcement also mentions the upcoming Oppo Watch 5, with all three products featuring in the company’s pre-order campaign.
Oppo has also teased a redesigned Notes app for the new tablet, with one-tap sharing features that let users insert images into notes and transfer vlog footage directly into CapCut’s media library. The feature could make content creation more convenient. However, the company has yet to reveal the tablet’s chipset, display, battery capacity, camera specifications, or pricing.
What are your expectations from the Oppo Pad Air 6 5G? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Logitech has released the MX Master 4 Developer (Special) Edition, a developer-themed version of its flagship mouse with a new look but the same hardware as the standard model.
We covered the MX Master 4 launch earlier, and the Developer (Special) Edition keeps all its hardware and features intact. The changes are limited to the exterior, which gets a developer-inspired design with etched circuit paths and code-style prompts across the shell.
There are a few hidden details, too. Logitech has added Easter eggs referencing computing history and open-source milestones, including a “Hello, World!” inscription on the thumb rest. The right mouse button also carries a Special Edition label styled like a code comment.
Underneath the new design, everything works just like the regular MX Master 4. Its thumb rest houses a haptic panel with feedback for actions such as snapping windows, switching desktops, and adjusting sliders. You can customize the feedback and its intensity through Logi Options+.
Windows 11 users also get native haptic feedback for window management and PowerPoint alignment. However, the feature requires the Windows update released at the end of March 2026, along with a firmware update installed through Options+.
The mouse also includes Logitech’s Actions Ring, which opens a circular menu of shortcuts around the cursor when you press the thumb button. According to Logitech, a 2025 study involving 37 MX Master owners found that the feature reduced mouse movements by up to 63%. The actual benefit will depend on which shortcuts you configure.
For scrolling, the MagSpeed wheel switches between a ratcheted mode and free spinning, with the latter reaching speeds of up to 1,000 lines per second. The 8,000 DPI sensor tracks on most surfaces, including glass at least 4 mm thick. Logitech claims the MX Master 4 offers 70 days of battery on a single charge, and the mouse can pair with up to three devices.
Price and availability
The Logitech MX Master 4 Developer (Special) Edition costs $119.99 in the US, €129.99 in Europe, and £119.99 in the UK. Shipping began on October 30, with availability limited to existing stock.
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
Tipster Digital Chat Station says OnePlus does not plan to update its small-screen phone for now. That means a successor to the OnePlus 15T is not coming soon.
The tipster shared the news in a post today. He did not give a reason or a timeline. He only said you can expect a wide-screen OnePlus phone instead. He didn’t name a model or share any specifications. OnePlus has not commented. Treat this as a tip for now.
The OnePlus 15T remains the compact option
OnePlus’s most recent compact phone is the OnePlus 15T, which debuted in March. It succeeds the OnePlus 13T, which came out last year.
Here, you get a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chip and a 7,500mAh battery. The display measures 6.32 inches, and the phone sits in a body 71.82mm wide and weighs about 194g. OnePlus kept the bezels to 1.1mm on all four sides. That is how the phone stays narrow while keeping the screen size.
The camera on the 15T sits inside a cube-shaped metal module and houses a 50MP main and 50MP 3.5x telephoto lens. The front has a 16MP camera for selfies. Despite its compact size, the phone has a big 7500mAh battery with 100W and 50W wireless charging support.
The phone runs ColorOS 16 on Android 16 in China. It has an IP69K rating and an ultrasonic in-display fingerprint sensor. Connectivity covers Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, and NFC.
Unfortunately, though, the OnePlus 15T did not launch globally and remained China-exclusive. There, it starts at 4,299 yuan (~ $645) for the 12GB RAM and 256GB storage model.
For now, the OnePlus 15T is the only small OnePlus phone on sale, even for users in China. We will update this story when OnePlus confirms any plans.
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
After its debut last Tuesday, the Redmi K100 is on sale in China today. The 12GB+256GB model costs 2,999 yuan (about $444) during a limited-time Double 11 offer.
The phone has a 10,000mAh battery and a 165Hz display. It is also the first standard K-series phone with a dedicated gaming graphics chip called D2.
The Redmi K100 comes in three memory and storage versions. Here are the prices:
Version
Retail price
Double 11 price
National subsidy price
12GB+256GB
3,499 yuan ($518)
2,999 yuan ($444)
2,549.15 yuan ($377)
12GB+512GB
4,099 yuan ($607)
3,499 yuan ($518)
2,999 yuan ($444)
16GB+512GB
4,499 yuan ($666)
3,899 yuan ($577)
3,399 yuan ($503)
The Double 11 offer saves you 500 to 600 yuan off the retail price. Last year’s Redmi K90 started at 2,599 yuan for its 12GB+256GB model. The base K100 now costs 400 yuan more at the Double 11 price.
The national subsidy is a Chinese government program that cuts the price of phones to encourage spending. Buyers get 15 percent off phones priced under 6,000 yuan, up to a maximum of 500 yuan per item. Each buyer can claim it for one item per product category. The 12GB+256GB model gets the full 15% off, which takes it from 2,999 yuan to 2,549.15 yuan. The two higher versions hit the 500 yuan cap.
Redmi K100 Specifications
The Redmi K100 has a 6.83-inch 1.5K flat screen with a 165Hz refresh rate. Peak brightness reaches 3,500 nits. The panel supports full brightness DC dimming and circularly polarized light. It also carries Xiaomi’s Green Mountain Eye Protection 4.0.
Redmi says the screen natively runs more than 40 games at 165 frames per second. The D2 chip adds super-resolution and super-frame at the same time in more than 100 mainstream games.
You get a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, LPDDR5X Ultra RAM, and UFS 4.1 storage. The D2 graphics chip sits alongside the main processor and handles the gaming features. The phone comes in black, snow white, and firefly green colors.
The Redmi K100 has a 10,000mAh Xiaomi Jinshajiang battery with 100W wired charging. You can also charge other devices from the phone at 27W over a wire.
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
A tipster on X says Samsung has started work on a 17-inch foldable tablet, following up on a leak from the same account in August. The earlier post shared the tablet’s dimensions but didn’t identify the manufacturer. The new post does, although it doesn’t reveal much else.
According to the August leak, the tablet measures 8 inches when folded and expands to 17 inches when opened. The tipster also said Samsung was developing multiple versions and test units, but didn’t share any further details. The latest post is even shorter, simply stating, “Samsung has already started.”
There’s still no word on a launch date, pricing, or the type of display Samsung plans to use. For now, this remains an unconfirmed rumor from a single source.
The idea is not out of character for Samsung. The Galaxy Z TriFold opened to a 10-inch screen. Samsung sold it as a limited run. The last US stock sold out in April. Samsung never pitched it as a mainstream phone. A 17-inch foldable would take that experiment into tablet territory.
Samsung also has fresh sales numbers to point to. Global pre-orders for the Galaxy Z Fold 8, Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Galaxy Z Flip 8 came in 30 percent above the previous generation. Buyers are clearly paying attention to new foldable shapes, which gives Samsung a reason to try larger screens.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
What’s more interesting is that Samsung would not be alone at this size. Apple is reportedly testing a foldable iPad with an 18- to 20-inch screen. The claim comes from a Chinese tipster named Kang, who tied the design to Huawei’s MateBook Fold. Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo suggests a launch in 2028 for Apple’s first foldable iPad. Samsung has given no timing for its own tablet, so it is unclear who would get there first.
For now, you have a company name attached to a screen size and nothing more. Nothing in the leak comes from Samsung. If the tipster shares more, we will keep you posted.
OnePlus Ace 7 and Ace 7 Pro share much of their hardware, including the display, battery capacity and primary camera. However, the Pro model introduces two important upgrades: a more powerful chipset and a dedicated periscope telephoto camera. With a relatively small price difference, the real question is whether these additions justify choosing the Pro or whether the standard Ace 7 already delivers everything most users need.
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
2. Design and Display
Build and Feel
The OnePlus Ace 7 and Ace 7 Pro follow an almost identical design approach, featuring glass backs, aluminum frames and Crystal Shield Glass protection. Both also carry IP68/IP69K ratings, offering strong protection against dust and water. The overall construction and durability experience should therefore be very similar, with neither phone having a significant advantage in everyday handling.
The main difference comes from their cooling systems. The Ace 7 features a built-in cooling fan, while the Ace 7 Pro upgrades to a bi-directional cooling fan. This should help the Pro model manage heat more effectively during demanding gaming sessions. For users who frequently play graphics-intensive games, the upgraded cooling solution is a meaningful improvement rather than just a cosmetic specification.
Display Quality
Both smartphones feature a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display with a 185Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, HDR Vivid and up to 2,000 nits of peak brightness. The 1272 x 2772 resolution also delivers similar sharpness, while 3840Hz PWM dimming provides additional comfort for users sensitive to screen flickering. Neither model offers a meaningful display upgrade over the other.
This means buyers do not need to choose the Pro simply for a better viewing experience. Gaming, scrolling, streaming and everyday navigation should feel equally impressive on both devices. The high refresh rate is particularly attractive for competitive gaming, although compatible content and games are necessary to take full advantage of it.
Verdict
The Pro’s bi-directional cooling fan is the meaningful design upgrade, but the display remains unchanged. Both offer essentially the same premium viewing and durability experience.
3. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The OnePlus Ace 7 runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series chipset, while the Ace 7 Pro upgrades to the standard Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Both use Adreno 840 graphics and offer up to 16GB RAM, with UFS 4.1 storage. Although their CPU configurations are identical on paper, the Pro’s chipset variant offers a different performance positioning.
For everyday applications, multitasking and most demanding games, both smartphones should deliver flagship-level performance. However, the standard Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 gives the Pro an advantage for buyers prioritising maximum processing capability. Combined with its bi-directional cooling fan, the Pro is also better positioned for sustained gaming workloads. The upgrade makes more sense for enthusiasts than ordinary users.
Battery and Charging
Battery capacity remains identical at 9,000mAh on both smartphones, making this one area where the Pro does not introduce a major upgrade. Both support 100W wired charging, along with UFCS, PPS and PD/QC charging standards. Bypass charging is also available, allowing users to power demanding gaming sessions without relying entirely on the battery.
The difference appears in the charging speed, with the Ace 7 reaching 58% in 30 minutes and the Ace 7 Pro reaching 60% in the same period. This is a relatively small improvement and unlikely to influence purchasing decisions. Both phones offer exceptional battery capacity, while the Pro’s cooling hardware adds more value for extended gaming sessions.
Verdict
The Ace 7 Pro has the stronger chipset and upgraded cooling, but battery capacity and charging remain nearly identical. The performance upgrade matters more to serious gamers.
4. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Both smartphones feature a 200MP primary camera with optical image stabilisation, PDAF and support for 8K video recording. This gives the standard Ace 7 a strong foundation for detailed photography, everyday shooting and high-resolution video. However, the secondary camera setup creates the biggest difference between these devices.
The Ace 7 uses an 8MP ultrawide camera, whereas the Ace 7 Pro replaces it with a 50MP periscope telephoto camera offering 3.5x optical zoom and OIS. This is a substantial change in photographic versatility. The Pro is better suited to distant subjects, portraits and zoom photography, while the standard model retains the advantage of dedicated ultrawide shooting. Buyers should consider their photography habits carefully because these cameras serve different purposes.
Selfie Camera
There is no upgrade on the front of either smartphone. Both feature a 16MP selfie camera with an f/2.4 aperture, panorama support and 1080p video recording at 30fps with gyro-EIS. Consequently, users can expect broadly similar hardware capabilities for selfies, video calls and casual front-camera recording.
For everyday social media photography, neither phone has a clear specification advantage. The absence of a higher-resolution selfie sensor or improved video recording capabilities also means the Pro upgrade is primarily focused on rear-camera versatility. Users who frequently record vlogs or prioritise front-camera photography may find the unchanged hardware less exciting than the Pro branding suggests.
Verdict
The Ace 7 Pro is the more versatile camera phone, thanks to its 50MP periscope lens. However, the standard Ace 7 retains an ultrawide camera that the Pro lacks.
5. Pricing
The OnePlus Ace 7 is priced around $660 (approximately ₹63,000), while the OnePlus Ace 7 Pro is priced around $720 (approximately ₹69,000). This creates a $60 difference, or roughly ₹6,000, between the two smartphones. Considering how closely matched their core specifications are, the price gap is relatively modest.
However, the additional spending does not bring a complete hardware overhaul. Both phones retain the same display, battery capacity, primary camera, selfie camera and charging capabilities. The Pro primarily justifies its higher price through the standard Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset, bi-directional cooling and dedicated periscope telephoto camera. These are targeted upgrades rather than improvements across every category.
Verdict
The Ace 7 offers better value for everyday users, while the Ace 7 Pro justifies its premium through specialised gaming and photography upgrades.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
6. Conclusion
The OnePlus Ace 7 and Ace 7 Pro are closely related smartphones, but their differences target two specific audiences. The standard Ace 7 combines a 200MP primary camera, 8MP ultrawide lens, built-in cooling fan and a powerful Snapdragon chipset. It already delivers an attractive package for users seeking flagship-level performance and excellent battery endurance without paying extra for specialised features.
The Ace 7 Pro takes a more enthusiast-focused approach. Its standard Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset, bi-directional cooling fan and 50MP periscope telephoto camera make it better equipped for sustained gaming and zoom photography. However, replacing the ultrawide camera with a telephoto lens involves a genuine trade-off. Buyers should also remember that both phones share the same display, 9,000mAh battery and 100W charging.
Verdict
The OnePlus Ace 7 Pro is the overall winner, offering more meaningful upgrades for just $60 extra. Its superior cooling, stronger chipset and optical zoom make it the better enthusiast phone. However, the standard Ace 7 remains the smarter value purchase for everyday users who do not need those specialised upgrades.
OnePlus Ace 7 vs Ace 7 Pro: 5 Major Differences
1. Processor: The Ace 7 uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series, while the Ace 7 Pro upgrades to the standard Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for stronger flagship performance.
2. Cooling System: The Ace 7 has a built-in cooling fan, whereas the Ace 7 Pro features a bi-directional cooling fan for improved heat management during extended gaming sessions.
3. Rear Cameras: The Ace 7 features a 200MP main camera and an 8MP ultrawide lens. The Ace 7 Pro replaces the ultrawide camera with a 50MP periscope telephoto lens offering 3.5x optical zoom and OIS.
4. Charging Speed: Both have a 9,000mAh battery and 100W wired charging, but the Ace 7 reaches 58% in 30 minutes, compared to 60% on the Pro.
5. Price: The Ace 7 is priced around $660 (₹63,000), while the Ace 7 Pro costs around $720 (₹69,000), making the Pro approximately $60 more expensive.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
Amazon US has the Bose QuietComfort Headphones at just $169, down from a $359 list price. That is a strong deal for commuters and travelers who want light, comfortable headphones with strong noise cancelling.
Is this a good price?
Yes. The QuietComfort Headphones launched at $349 in late 2023, so $169 is less than half the launch price. Against Amazon’s $359 list price, you save $190, or 53%. It is also the lowest price we’ve seen lately, and about 45% below its usual price over that stretch.
Note that Amazon has cut the price before. It sold them for $249 around Black Friday 2023 and $199 around Presidents Day 2026. They returned to $169 during Prime Big Deal Days in October 2026, and this price matches that sale, so there is no reason to hold out for a bigger cut.
Price now
$169
List price
$359
You save
$190 (53%)
Price as of
30 Oct 2026, 17:28 IST
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
What you get
Noise cancelling: Quiet Mode blocks the world, Aware Mode lets it back in, and a Custom Mode in the Bose app sits between the two. This is the main reason to buy these headphones.
Battery: Bose rates them for up to 24 hours with noise cancelling on. A 15-minute charge gives 2.5 hours, which helps if you forget to charge before a flight.
Connections: Multipoint links two devices at once, so you can switch between a laptop and a phone. A headphone jack covers wired use, though Bluetooth 5.1 with only AAC and SBC is dated.
Weight: At 240 g they stay comfortable on long trips. Light weight and gentle clamping are what set these apart from cheaper rivals.
What users usually like and what they didn’t
Like:
Very comfortable and light, with low clamping force.
Noise-canceling ranks among the best in the class.
They fold down, and the box includes a hard case and an audio cable.
Bass-forward sound that most reviewers found punchy.
The Bose app adds EQ and noise-cancelling mode controls.
Didn’t like:
Battery life could be better.
Bluetooth 5.1 is old, and there is no aptX.
Call quality is not a strength.
They can slip off with moderate movement, so they are a poor choice for workouts.
Few new features over the QuietComfort 45 they replaced.
How it compares
Sony WH-CH730N Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones ($128 on Amazon US): Battery life is the case for the Sony WH-CH730N, with up to 50 hours with noise cancelling on. It is a newer budget model, so expect less polish than the Bose.
JBL Live 780NC – Wireless Over-Ear Noise Cancelling Headphones ($139.95 on Amazon US): The JBL Live 780NC packs in more features for the money, according to one review. That same comparison still found the Bose hard to beat if comfort comes first.
Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless Headphones, ANC, 60 Hr Battery ($198 on Amazon US): Choose the Sennheiser Momentum 4 if you hate charging, since it is rated for up to 60 hours. It is an older model now that a newer generation has arrived.
Rival prices on Amazon US as of 30 Oct 2026, 17:29–17:30 IST. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Should you buy it?
Buy them now if you commute or fly often and want comfort and strong noise cancelling at less than half the launch price. Skip them if you want headphones for the gym, take a lot of calls, or need more than 24 hours of battery. The Sony and Sennheiser options last far longer between charges.
OnePlus 16 and OPPO Find X10 take different approaches to flagship smartphone design. While OnePlus focuses on extreme performance, a high-refresh-rate display, and an exceptionally large battery, OPPO puts greater emphasis on camera versatility, display brightness, and a balanced flagship experience. Both phones feature premium hardware, but their differences could make one a considerably better purchase depending on individual priorities.
Glass front and back, aluminum frame or glass-fiber back
Glass front and back, aluminum frame
OnePlus – Better IP69K protection
Water Resistance
IP68/IP69K
IP68/IP69
OnePlus – Higher water-jet resistance
Display Size
6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED
6.59-inch LTPO AMOLED
OnePlus – Larger display
Refresh Rate
185Hz
144Hz
OnePlus – Smoother refresh rate
Peak Brightness
2000 nits HBM
3600 nits peak
OPPO – Higher peak brightness
Resolution
1272 x 2772 pixels
1272 x 2772 pixels
OPPO – Higher pixel density
Processor
Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
Dimensity 9600M
OnePlus – More powerful flagship chipset
GPU
Adreno 850
ARM G1-Ultra
OnePlus – Stronger performance proposition
RAM
Up to 16GB
Up to 16GB
Tie – Same maximum RAM
Storage
Up to 1TB UFS 4.1
Up to 1TB UFS 4.1
Tie – Same storage capacity
Main Camera
200MP, OIS
200MP, OIS
Tie – Similar primary camera specifications
Telephoto Camera
50MP, 3x optical zoom, OIS
200MP periscope, 2.8x optical zoom, OIS
OPPO – Higher-resolution periscope camera
Ultrawide Camera
50MP with autofocus
50MP with autofocus
Tie – Similar camera specifications
Selfie Camera
50MP ultrawide with autofocus
50MP ultrawide with PDAF
Tie – Both support 4K video
Video Recording
Up to 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps
Up to 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps
Tie – Similar video capabilities
Battery
9,000mAh
8,000mAh Global
OnePlus – Larger battery
Wired Charging
100W
80W
OnePlus – Faster charging
Wireless Charging
50W
50W
Tie – Same charging speed
Reverse Charging
Reverse wireless and 5W reverse wired
10W reverse wireless
OPPO – Faster reverse wireless charging
Connectivity
Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0
Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.2
OPPO – Newer Bluetooth version
Special Features
Bypass charging, Dolby Vision, UAV-grade gyro
Hasselblad calibration, satellite connectivity on 1TB model
OPPO – Hasselblad imaging and satellite support
Price/Value
$900 / ₹86,000
$800 / ₹78,500
OPPO – Lower price and advanced zoom camera
Overall
Performance and battery-focused flagship
Camera-focused flagship
OnePlus – Better performance and battery package
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
2. Design and Display
Build and Feel
The OnePlus 16 features a premium glass-and-aluminum construction, with Crystal Shield Glass protection and an option for a glass-fiber reinforced plastic back. Its IP68/IP69K rating provides excellent protection against dust and water, including high-pressure water jets. The OPPO Find X10 also uses a glass-and-aluminum design with Crystal Guard protection and an IP68/IP69 rating. Both phones offer ultrasonic fingerprint scanners, giving them a similarly premium approach to durability and security. However, OnePlus has a slight advantage in water resistance, while OPPO maintains a more understated flagship design.
Display Quality
The OnePlus 16 features a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display with a 185Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision, HDR10+ and HDR Vivid support. Its exceptionally high refresh rate makes it particularly attractive for gaming and fluid navigation. The OPPO Find X10 has a smaller 6.59-inch LTPO AMOLED panel with a 144Hz refresh rate and an impressive 3600-nit peak brightness. Both deliver sharp visuals, but OPPO’s higher peak brightness makes it particularly appealing for outdoor viewing.
Verdict
OnePlus wins for gaming-focused smoothness and durability, while OPPO offers excellent brightness and a more compact viewing experience. Overall, OnePlus takes this round.
3. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The OnePlus 16 runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, built on a 2nm process, paired with the Adreno 850 GPU. Its powerful CPU configuration makes it the stronger choice for demanding gaming, multitasking and performance-intensive applications. The OPPO Find X10 uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9600M, a 3nm chipset featuring the ARM G1-Ultra GPU. Although it should deliver flagship-level performance, the Snapdragon platform gives OnePlus a more compelling proposition for enthusiasts seeking maximum processing power. Both devices offer up to 16GB RAM and 1TB UFS 4.1 storage, ensuring plenty of room for applications, games and files.
Battery capacity is another major difference. The OnePlus 16 packs a massive 9,000mAh silicon-carbon battery with 100W wired and 50W wireless charging. It also supports reverse wireless charging and bypass charging, making it particularly useful for extended gaming sessions. OPPO offers an 8,000mAh global battery with 80W wired and 50W wireless charging. Its battery capacity is still impressive, but OnePlus provides more endurance potential and faster wired charging.
Verdict
OnePlus clearly wins this category with its more powerful chipset, larger battery and faster wired charging. It is the better option for performance enthusiasts and heavy users.
4. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Both smartphones feature a 200MP primary camera with a large sensor, f/1.6 aperture and optical image stabilisation. However, their telephoto implementations are quite different. The OnePlus 16 uses a 50MP telephoto camera with 3x optical zoom, while OPPO upgrades the experience with a 200MP periscope telephoto camera offering 2.8x optical zoom and a larger sensor. This gives the Find X10 a significant advantage for capturing detailed zoom photographs. Both phones also feature 50MP ultrawide cameras with autofocus. OPPO further benefits from Hasselblad Color Calibration, while OnePlus offers a laser focus system and colour spectrum sensor. Both support 8K recording, 4K at 120fps and Dolby Vision. However, OPPO’s high-resolution periscope camera makes its camera system more versatile.
Selfie Camera
Both devices feature a 50MP ultrawide front camera with autofocus and 4K video recording at 60fps. The OPPO Find X10 additionally specifies PDAF and a dedicated sensor size, while OnePlus offers HDR and panorama features. Both should deliver detailed selfies and flexible framing.
Verdict
OPPO wins the camera category, primarily because of its 200MP periscope telephoto camera, larger zoom sensor and Hasselblad colour calibration.
5. Pricing
The OnePlus 16 is priced around $900 (₹86,000), making it approximately $100 more expensive than the OPPO Find X10, which is priced around $800 (₹78,500). This difference is particularly interesting because both phones offer premium materials, high-end AMOLED displays, 50MP selfie cameras, wireless charging, and substantial storage configurations. However, their priorities differ considerably. OnePlus justifies its higher asking price with a more powerful Snapdragon chipset, a faster display and a larger battery. OPPO, meanwhile, offers a sophisticated camera setup with a high-resolution periscope lens at a lower starting price.
OPPO wins on value for money, offering a more versatile camera system and premium flagship features while costing approximately $100 less.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
6. Conclusion
The OnePlus 16 stands out with its Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 processor, 185Hz LTPO AMOLED display, 9,000mAh battery, and 100W wired charging. Its IP68/IP69K protection and bypass charging also make it particularly appealing to gamers and power users. The OPPO Find X10 counters with a 200MP periscope telephoto camera, Hasselblad colour calibration, a brighter display and a substantial 8,000mAh battery. Its 3600-nit peak brightness and more affordable pricing further strengthen its appeal. Both phones deliver impressive flagship experiences, but their strengths serve different audiences. OnePlus is clearly designed around performance and endurance, whereas OPPO places greater emphasis on photography and everyday versatility.
Verdict
The OnePlus 16 is the overall winner for its superior processing hardware, faster display, larger battery, and charging capabilities. However, the OPPO Find X10 is the better buy for photography enthusiasts, offering a more advanced zoom camera and better value for money.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
Early retailer listings have given us the first solid look at how much two of Motorola’s upcoming devices might cost. The company seems to be swinging high with its next proper flagship while keeping a new foldable a bit more approachable.
The Motorola Signature 27 (first shown back in September) has appeared at Portuguese retailer MegaPC. The 12GB + 512GB version is listed at €1,594.90 (around $1,770). That puts it among the priciest regular flagships right now, with only a few specialized camera phones like the Vivo X500 Pro Max sitting higher. Motorola itself hasn’t confirmed any official pricing or release details yet.
To justify that price, the Signature 27 packs the Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, a 1/1.28-inch Sony LYT-910 primary sensor, a 200MP periscope telephoto with 5x optical zoom, a Bang & Olufsen sound system housed inside a metal frame, and a “tactical fabric” rear cover. On the front, it has a 6.8-inch 165 Hz AMOLED display, hiding inside a 7,000 mAh battery.
Sitting alongside it in the listings is the Razr Flex 27, which is expected to be a book-style wide foldable in the same vein as the Apple iPhone Duo or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8. The 12GB + 256GB model is priced at €1,510.90 (about $1,679), with shipping shown for mid-December. Rumors point to it using the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 instead of the higher-end Elite Extreme Gen 6, which would help explain why it undercuts a lot of rival foldables.
The device has also been spotted on the UAE’s TDRA certification database under the model number XT2761-1 (registration ER67054/26, issued October 29), which officially confirms the Motorola Razr Flex 27 name.
Earlier Geekbench listings already pointed to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Android 17, and 12GB RAM. Meanwhile, the European retailer page mentions Pantone Coriander and Pantone Dark Botanical Garden color options. However, it’s worth noting that the same listing incorrectly describes the phone as a clamshell, whereas the Flex is expected to be a wide, book-style foldable.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
