Xiaomi has opened crowdfunding for a new smart plug that makes it easy to turn regular appliances into smart ones.
The Xiaomi Smart Socket 4 is listed on Xiaomi Youpin for 49 yuan (around $7), with the campaign running until September 16 at 09:59:59. The regular price will be 59 yuan. It’s a compact plug aimed at people who simply want remote control and energy tracking for older devices around the house.
It connects straight over Wi-Fi 6 (2.4 GHz only), so you don’t need a separate gateway. Combined MU-MIMO and OFDMA tech should keep things stable even when you’ve got a bunch of devices online at once, commands don’t have to sit in a queue. Basically, you can make ordinary appliances respond through your phone instead of walking over to flip a switch.
The socket works with Xiaomi’s HyperOS Smart Connect system and shows up in the Mi Home app. From there you can control it alongside your other devices and set up custom automation scenes that match your daily routine. It also has a high-precision metering chip that gives you clear charts for power use, so you can check daily, weekly, or monthly stats whenever you want.
Timer and countdown functions run locally on the plug itself. That means scheduled tasks keep working even if the internet drops, and power cuts off automatically when the time is up. You can also set the physical button so a double-press starts a countdown and shuts everything off without opening the app.
A few practical upgrades stand out: the body is smaller (52 × 41 × 57.6 mm), so it blocks fewer neighboring outlets on a power strip. It uses the updated Chinese national standard plugs with insulated sleeves for better safety. There’s also protection against overheating, surges, over-current/overload, plus charging safeguards and a child lock. In the app you can set power limits anywhere from 100 W to 2500 W.
I’ve been using Obsbot cameras for quite a while now. Recently, I reviewed their Tiny 3 series, which I absolutely loved for its smooth, robotic tracking, so when Obsbot sent over the new Meet Flip as a review unit, I was eager to see how it fit into their lineup.
I’ve been using this camera for over two weeks now as my primary webcam for work in my home office. Unlike the complex gimbals of the Tiny line, the Meet Flip takes a much simpler approach.
The Meet Flip is a 4K webcam that prioritizes portability and privacy. Its defining feature is right in the name: a hinge that lets you fold the camera lens inward when you aren’t using it. It’s a simple mechanical solution to a modern problem. When the camera is folded, it goes to sleep, and the lens is physically covered.
Here is a realistic look at what it does well, where it falls short, and whether it’s worth adding to your setup.
Design and Build Quality
The first thing you notice about the Meet Flip is its size. It weighs just 37.7 grams, and when folded, it measures roughly 1.6 x 1.8 x 0.7 inches. It is remarkably compact, taking up almost no room on a desk or in a laptop bag if you do need to pack it away. You don’t need a special carrying case; the folding design naturally protects the lens from scratches and dust.
Visually, it’s a very subtle device. It has a matte black finish, a silver hinge in the middle, and a small status light around the lens to let you know when it’s active. It doesn’t draw attention to itself, which I appreciate for a device meant to sit in a professional environment.
The folding mechanism is easily my favorite part of the design. Many webcams come with flimsy plastic privacy sliders that are easy to forget, or magnetic caps that eventually get lost. The Meet Flip makes privacy the default state of storing the device. You open it to turn it on, and you close it to turn it off. It offers a simple, physical reassurance that your camera isn’t watching you when the meeting is over.
Mounting and Setup
The bottom half of the folded device acts as the mount. It has a rubberized interior that rests securely on most laptop screens and standard desktop monitors. There is also a standard 1/4-inch tripod thread on the bottom, which is a helpful addition if you prefer to mount your webcam on a desk stand for a better angle.
However, the mount isn’t perfect. Because of how the hinge operates and where the USB-C port is located on the back of the camera, the mount only opens to a 90-degree angle. Obsbot says that it supports screens up to 20.5mm thick. If you use an older, thicker monitor or a heavily curved display, the Meet Flip might struggle to sit securely. That said, since most of us use at least a modern laptop or a standard flat monitor these days, it really isn’t much of an issue for the average setup.
What it might lack in hinge flexibility, it makes up for with versatile mounting options. The camera’s design and magnetic base allow you to easily switch between standard landscape shooting, portrait shooting (perfect for mobile-centric formats like TikTok or Reels), and even upside-down shooting, with the software automatically adjusting the image orientation to match.
Another minor issue is the included cable. Obsbot includes a USB-C to USB-C cable (along with a USB-A adapter), but the cable itself is quite stiff. Because the cable opening is straight behind the camera, the stiff wire extends directly from the back, requiring more clearance behind your monitor.
Since the camera is so light, this rigid cable can sometimes pull the camera out of place if you bump the wire on your desk. Including a lightweight paracord cable here would have been the best choice, and an L-shaped connector would have been a great option as well to help manage the rear clearance and keep things tidy.
Video Quality
Inside the Meet Flip is a 1/2-inch Sony CMOS sensor that shoots in either 4K at 30 frames per second or 1080p at 60 frames per second. It also features a fairly wide f/1.8 aperture.
For a webcam in this price range, the image quality is very good. In a well-lit room, the 4K image is sharp and detailed. Out of the box, Obsbot’s default color profile looks really natural and punchy as well, which generally looks nice on skin tones and keeps you from looking washed out by harsh monitor light.
It handles lower light situations reasonably well, too. If you are working in a dimly lit home office with only your screen illuminating your face, the f/1.8 aperture and HDR support help keep the image really usable. You will notice some grain and softness in the darker areas of the room, but it is still a noticeable improvement over the standard 720p or 1080p cameras built into most laptops.
Wide (HDR On)Medium (HDR On)Narrow (HDR On)Wide (No HDR)Medium (No HDR)Narrow (No HDR)
The autofocus is handled by a Phase-Detection Auto Focus (PDAF) system, and it works reliably. If you need to hold a document or a product up to the camera, it focuses on the object quickly and shifts back to your face as soon as you lower it. Just remember to keep your hand near the object so the camera knows where to pull focus.
Low Light PerformanceObject Focus
The field of view is also a major plus. The wide angle is excellent, easily accommodating multiple people in the frame if needed. Given how incredibly lightweight the camera is, this flexibility is a huge bonus. It works perfectly whether you’re taking a solo call at your desk or want to showcase a bit more of your background.
Software Features
You can use the Meet Flip right out of the box without installing any software. It works as a standard plug-and-play webcam with Windows and macOS, and it connects easily to Zoom, Teams, OBS, and even the Nintendo Switch 2.
But if you want to adjust the settings, you’ll need to download the Obsbot Center app. Webcam software can sometimes be clunky, but Obsbot’s app is really clean and easy to navigate.
Because the Meet Flip is a stationary camera, its tracking features are entirely digital. The AI Auto Framing feature crops into the 4K image and digitally pans to keep you centered in the frame. It works smoothly and is helpful if you tend to shift around in your chair during long calls. Because it crops the image, you do lose a bit of resolution, but starting from a 4K image means the final result still looks clear on a standard video call.
The software also includes gesture controls, allowing you to hold up your hand to turn the tracking on or off, or make an L shape to zoom.
There are a few extra tools in the app, like a built-in teleprompter that lets you read a script over your screen, and a loop recording feature that lets you play a short video of yourself on repeat. You can also play around with Avatar and Overlay features to further customize your video feed, along with background blur and background replacement options if you want to swap out your real-world environment for an image.
Obsbot also includes a feature called AI Magic Notes for transcribing meetings. You get 120 minutes for free before it requires a subscription.
Audio Performance
The Meet Flip uses a dual-microphone system (one omnidirectional and one directional). Through the software, you can choose between four different audio modes depending on your environment: Directional mode (which focuses specifically on sound coming from directly in front of the camera), Omnidirectional mode (which picks up sound from all around, great if you have multiple people in the room), Pure Audio mode (which keeps the original voice and surrounding sounds), and Smart Omni mode (which balances picking up room audio while intelligently filtering out unwanted background hums). For my room, I prefer the Smart Omni mode, as it provides the most natural balance for my setup.
The built-in noise reduction does a decent job of filtering out steady background sounds, like a fan or the hum of an air conditioner. For everyday use, like joining a morning team meeting or taking a quick call from your desk, the microphones are perfectly adequate. Your voice will come through clearly enough for people to understand you.
However, it still sounds like a webcam microphone. Because the device is so small and sits a couple of feet away from your mouth, the audio lacks the depth and clarity of a dedicated microphone. If you are recording a podcast, doing voiceover work, or presenting to a large audience, you will still want to use a separate USB microphone or a good headset.
The Verdict
The Obsbot Meet Flip is a well-designed device that solves a few practical problems for remote workers. It doesn’t overcomplicate things; it just provides a good image in a very compact package.
If you mostly use a laptop and are happy with its built-in camera, you probably don’t need to spend $119 on this. But if you frequently work from an external monitor with your laptop closed, or if you just want a reliable, unobtrusive camera for your home office that guarantees your privacy when the workday is over, the Meet Flip is a solid option.
OBE has released a new home projector in China, the R3 Ultra Max. It is now listed on JD.com for 3,999 yuan ($596). Rather than focusing solely on pushing resolution limits, the company has built this 1080p model around physical flexibility and integrated audio, attempting to solve common setup issues for standard living rooms.
The R3 Ultra Max features an integrated Z-shaped gimbal with 120-degree vertical tilt and 360-degree horizontal rotation. It supports ceiling projection, while the base-mounted speakers maintain their orientation regardless of the projection angle.
For the display itself, the projector includes a native 1080p LCD panel with 4K input support, 1,800 CVIA lumens of brightness, and a 40,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio. It uses a 5-inch TCL CSOT panel, supports 40 to 150-inch projection sizes, and has a 1.2:1 throw ratio. OBE also rates operating noise at below 26dB.
For audio, the R3 Ultra Max features a 2.1-channel speaker system with two 10W mid/high-frequency drivers and a dedicated 25W subwoofer. It comes with a large 1,070cc acoustic chamber and delivers bass frequencies as low as 43Hz. The setup is designed to offer fuller sound and stronger bass compared to the standard built-in speakers found on most projectors.
Internally, the projector runs on a MediaTek MT9681 processor, 4GB of RAM, and 64GB of storage. The port selection is standard for current-generation displays, featuring two HDMI 2.1 ports (one supporting eARC for external soundbars), a USB-A 3.0 port, and a 3.5mm audio jack. OBE says an input latency of 3ms, which makes it a viable option for casual gaming. Wireless connectivity includes dual-band Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2.
On the software side, it runs OBE’s Super AI OS 2.0. The interface includes standard wireless casting protocols like AirPlay and Miracast, and integrates Tencent’s Hunyuan large language model for voice searches and basic queries. To handle the actual screen calibration, the projector uses a ToF sensor and a CMOS camera to automate keystone correction, focus, screen alignment, and obstacle avoidance.
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
OBE has announced the C5 Pro, a new 1080p projector launching in China that focuses on flexible placement and automated setup. The projector will be available starting September 24th with an introductory price of 1,099 yuan ($164), before shifting to its standard retail price of 1,499 yuan ($223).
The C5 Pro is built around an LCD display system and OBE’s fully enclosed optical engine. The company worked with TCL CSOT to develop a new metal BM high-transmittance panel for the device, which it says improves light transmittance by 20%.
🔌 You’ll NeedIt throws a 40-120 inch image, so a proper projector screen makes the picture noticeably sharper than a bare wall. Check projector screen price on Amazon →
The projector outputs a native 1920 x 1080 resolution with a rated brightness of 600 CVIA lumens and a 3000:1 contrast ratio. It supports HDR content and 4K decoding, and with a 1.2:1 throw ratio, it is designed to project screens ranging from 40 to 120 inches.
From a hardware perspective, the C5 Pro features an integrated U-shaped gimbal stand that allows you to easily adjust the projector to different angles. The flexible design also makes it possible to point the projector directly at the ceiling for a more relaxed viewing setup.
OBE pairs the gimbal with Scheimpflug full-screen clarity technology, which helps maintain consistent sharpness across the entire image, including the edges, when projecting from an angle.
Setup is handled by a dual-module sensor system that pairs a Time-of-Flight (ToF) sensor with a full-color camera. This enables standard smart projector features like automatic keystone correction, autofocus, obstacle avoidance, and wall color adaptation.
Inside, the C5 Pro runs on an MT9-series processor alongside 1GB of RAM and 32GB of internal storage. Connectivity includes dual-band Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.3, an HDMI 2.0 port, and a USB 2.0 port. There is also a dedicated low-latency game mode for connected consoles.
For audio, the OBE C5 Pro features a single 10W speaker, while the gimbal base comes with a touch-controlled night light that can sync with the sound to create dynamic lighting effects. On the software side, the projector runs OBE OS, which offers an ad-free experience during both startup and screen casting.
In related news, Aurzen has recently launched the ZIP Pro tri-fold pocket projector with 1080p resolution and up to 2.5 hours of battery life. Dangbei has also launched the RX10 1080p laser projector with 1,200 CVIA lumens of brightness, a rotating gimbal, and power bank support.
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
Fairphone is working on a new version of its repair-friendly wireless earbuds, and some early photos just gave us the first real look at what’s coming.
Leaked images of the Fairbuds 2 have surfaced, showing a refreshed pair of true wireless earbuds from the sustainability-focused Dutch company. Fairphone released the original Fairbuds back in April 2024 as one of the first truly modular TWS options out there. The follow-up is now lined up for a fourth-quarter 2026 launch (sometime between October and December), and the new shots show it in green and black.
The biggest visual shift is the addition of stems. The first-gen Fairbuds went with a more rounded, stemless design, while the Fairbuds 2 switch to a more conventional stem-style look. The charging case also appears noticeably thicker than before. That extra bulk has people wondering whether Fairphone packed in a bigger battery than the 500 mAh one in the original case, though we still don’t have official numbers.
Exact specs and pricing haven’t been shared yet. What is clear is that Fairphone is sticking to its usual priorities: longevity and repairability. The original Fairbuds stood out because you could replace seven different parts yourself, including the batteries in each earbud and the case, the silicone rings, tips, and even the outer shell of the case, all with just a Phillips screwdriver and a simple prying tool.
The company has said the new model will stay modular, but it hasn’t spelled out exactly which parts will be swappable this time. Given Fairphone’s whole approach, it’s a pretty safe bet that easy battery and part replacement will still be a big part of the pitch.
The original Fairbuds came with titanium-coated 11 mm drivers, active noise cancellation (plus wind-noise reduction), six microphones, Bluetooth 5.3 with multipoint, IP54 water and sweat resistance, and up to 26 hours of total playtime with the case. They also scored really well for repairability, including a rare top mark from iFixit. The Fairbuds 2 should build on that foundation while polishing the design so it appeals to more people.
Fresh high-quality renders of the Galaxy SmartTag 3 just dropped, giving us the best preview yet of Samsung’s upcoming Bluetooth tracker. The images confirm a pretty limited color selection ahead of what looks like a near-term launch.
The SmartTag 3 switches to a compact squircle shape, same vibe as the latest Galaxy Watches and One UI icons. It’s a clear step away from the pill-shaped SmartTag 2. The white version has a light outer frame around a central circular section with a subtle brushed metallic look, separated by a slightly raised border. The black one keeps the same shape but goes fully dark. Both have the Samsung logo right on the central button.
One noticeable change: there’s no built-in cutout or loop for a keyring, carabiner, or strap like the previous models had. Looks like you’ll need an official case or accessory if you want to attach it to something. Reports say Samsung is working on a few options, bumper, silicone, and leather cases, plus a pet-collar mount. On the back you’ll find the usual regulatory marking.
Leaked store listings point to just two colors so far: black (EI-T5900BBEGUS) and white (EI-T5900BWEGUS). Pricing seems to be staying the same as before, $29.99 for a single unit and $99.99 for a four-pack in the US. European pricing has been a bit all over the place in different reports, but it’s still in the same ballpark.
On the tech side, FCC filings confirm Bluetooth Low Energy and Ultra-Wideband for more precise short-range tracking. It’s reportedly around 30 x 30 mm and under 10 mm thick. Expect it to work with Samsung’s Find network, keep the central physical button (handy for finding your phone or triggering Modes & Routines), and offer solid water and dust resistance, probably IP67 or something close. Battery life should stay competitive thanks to the replaceable cell, just like the SmartTag 2.
For Galaxy users, the redesign leans hard into a cleaner look and better ecosystem consistency. The missing attachment point might mean an extra accessory purchase for a lot of people, though. As always with leaks, final specs, availability, and packaging details will only be locked in once Samsung makes it official.
Ugreen’s slim charger lineup has now made its way to the UK. The company’s 100W card-style charger, first launched in China as the Mini Ice GaN charger, is now available in the UK as the Nexode Air Slim 100W. It comes with foldable UK-standard plugs and costs £59.99.
The charger has two USB-C ports and one USB-A port packed into its thin, card-shaped body. Either USB-C port can deliver up to 100W on its own, which is enough for most laptops. The USB-A port supports up to 22.5W. When charging two or three devices at the same time, the first device you connect still gets between 60W and 80W, depending on the setup.
Under the hood
Ugreen is using a new GaN (Gallium Nitride) chip inside the charger and claims it can reach 93% conversion efficiency. Higher efficiency means less energy is wasted as heat, helping the charger stay cooler and allowing Ugreen to keep the body thin.
The foldable plugs are another useful part of the design. UK plugs can take up quite a bit of space, but the Nexode Air Slim 100W’s prongs fold into the charger when they’re not in use. This makes it easier to slip into a laptop sleeve, backpack, or small pocket without the plugs getting caught on other things.
The flat design can also be useful in tight spaces. Unlike a typical bulky charger, the card-shaped body can sit closer to the wall when you’re charging behind furniture or in another cramped spot.
Ugreen has also included the usual safety protections, including safeguards against overvoltage, overcurrent, overheating, and short circuits.
At £59.99, the Nexode Air Slim 100W is priced close to Ugreen’s Nexode Pro 100W charger, which launched in the UK last month. The Nexode Pro has a four-port design and a color display, while the Air Slim focuses on keeping the charger as thin as possible.
Earlier this month, Motorola confirmed that the Edge 70 Neo is coming to India, but the company has yet to reveal its full specifications. The Edge 70 Neo has now shown up on Geekbench, and the listing fills in some of the gaps left by earlier design leaks.
The Motorola Edge 70 Neo scored 723 points in the single-core test and 2,943 points in the multi-core test. The listing identifies the chipset as the QTI SM7635, which translates to Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 in marketing name.
The chipset uses an octa-core CPU setup with four cores clocked at 1.80GHz, three at 2.40GHz, and a prime core reaching 2.50GHz. Graphics and video duties are handled by the Adreno 810 GPU.
The Geekbench listing also shows the phone running on 6GB of RAM and Android 16 OS. The test was performed using Geekbench 7.0.0 on Android AArch64, although final retail performance can vary slightly.
Motorola Edge 70 Neo has the same chip as the Edge 70 Plus
Interestingly, the Edge 70 Neo features the same chipset as the Motorola Edge 70 Plus in its global version. So it could be that the Edge 70 Neo is a rebranded version of the Edge 70 Plus for the Indian market. And this isn’t new for Motorola. It has used a similar technique for some of its past Edge-series phones.
If you want a sense of what this chip actually delivers day-to-day, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3’s benchmark scores give you a good baseline, since it’s the same silicon showing up here. It’s a mid-range chip built for smooth everyday use rather than flagship-tier gaming, so you shouldn’t expect it to compete with pricier silicon on raw power.
Motorola has not yet revealed the Edge 70 Neo’s display, battery, or camera specifications. If the phone is indeed based on the Edge 70 Plus, more details could become clear once Motorola officially announces its India launch.
Vivo confirmed the standard X500’s camera hardware through a Weibo teaser from earlier this month, and now tipster Panda is Bald has gone hands-on with the phone itself. The image reveals several details that Vivo has yet to officially announce, including the chipset, memory, storage, and battery.
The X500 is powered by a Dimensity 9600M running at 4.21GHz across its eight cores. The base configuration comes with 12GB of RAM and 512GB of storage. Vivo also supports virtual memory expansion of up to 24GB and storage expansion of up to 50GB through compression.
What’s notable here is that this is the first mention or on-device confirmation of Dimensity 9600M. The chip is likely based on Dimensity 9500, which was previously rumored to be rebranded for some 2026 flagship.
There’s one more chip
As for the cameras, the X500 uses the same main sensor as the X300 Pro: a Blueprint-branded Sony LYTIA-828 measuring 1/1.28-inch. Vivo says this is the largest main camera sensor it has used on a standard X-series model. The camera also gets Zeiss gimbal-level stabilization with a CIPA 5.5 rating.
The telephoto camera comes from the X500 Pro instead. It uses the Sony LYTIA-610 sensor found in the Pro’s APO telephoto setup, also with a CIPA 5.5 stabilization rating. It can record 4K video at 120fps for slow-motion footage.
Vivo could also offer the standard X500 with dedicated teleconverter support. The compact accessory is designed to extend its telephoto capabilities. Meanwhile, the image processing will be handled by Vivo’s Blueprint V3+ imaging chip.
Keeping the lights on is a 7,500mAh battery, as confirmed in the spec sheet.
Vivo will reveal the X500’s price and availability at the official launch on September 21 at 7 PM. The X500 series will be introduced alongside several other products.
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
Honor says the Magic9 series will feature a 55MP “Agile Eye” front camera with a square-shaped design. It is the first Android phone with a square front-facing camera, which the company says gives the sensor more room to capture a wider frame than the circular and pill-shaped cameras commonly used on phones.
Honor’s teaser also shows the camera switching between vertical and horizontal shots while keeping a wide field of view.
However, the square front camera will not be available across the entire Magic 9 lineup. In the teaser footnote, Honor confirmed the square selfie camera will be exclusive to the Magic 9 Pro Max and the standard Magic 9. More details about the other models should arrive with the full launch.
More about Honor Magic 9 series cameras
The front camera is just one part of Honor’s camera-focused approach to the Magic 9 series. The company has worked with ARRI on the lineup, while the rear camera module houses a triple-camera system with two 200-megapixel ARRI sensors. Honor is also introducing a 500mm teleconverter with the series.
For video, the phones will also get a new ARRI Cinema Mode. Honor is positioning the Magic 9 series as a more complete camera system rather than simply another phone with high-resolution sensors.
Honor Magic 9 series
The Magic 9 Pro Max gets most of the camera hardware and keeps the clean design language seen on previous Magic phones. Honor has reworked the edges, rear panel, and overall shape, while the rear camera module gets a new “Guide’s Eye” design.
On paper, the Pixel 11 and iPhone 17 look like evenly matched rivals. In practice, they make very different trade-offs. The Pixel 11 bets on camera versatility, battery life and Google’s AI-driven experience, while the iPhone 17 leans into raw performance, video and polish. For buyers spending flagship money, choosing between them comes down to which strengths matter most.
The Pixel 11 combines Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both sides with an aluminum frame and IP68 protection. Its design feels familiar but durable, while the ultrasonic fingerprint sensor adds convenient biometric unlocking. The iPhone 17 uses Ceramic Shield 2, an aluminum frame and glass back, with stronger stated water resistance and Face ID.
Both phones look premium, but the iPhone 17 feels slightly more refined thanks to its Ceramic Shield 2 protection and tighter ecosystem integration. The Pixel 11 is more practical for users who prefer fingerprint unlocking and Android’s flexible interface. Neither has a headphone jack, while both feature stereo speakers and modern wireless connectivity. Overall, the Pixel feels more functional, while the iPhone feels more polished.
Both smartphones feature 6.3-inch 120Hz OLED panels with HDR support and 3000-nit peak brightness. The Pixel 11 offers HDR10+ and a 1080p-class resolution, while the iPhone 17 uses a sharper 1206 x 2622 panel with Dolby Vision and an anti-reflective coating. The iPhone also has a higher stated pixel density.
The Pixel’s display should still look excellent for everyday use, streaming and gaming, but the iPhone 17 has the stronger specifications overall. Its sharper panel, Dolby Vision support and anti-reflective treatment make it the more impressive option for multimedia consumption and outdoor viewing.
Verdict
The iPhone 17 wins the display comparison with its sharper panel, Dolby Vision and anti-reflective coating. The Pixel 11 counters with excellent brightness and HDR10+, but Apple’s screen feels more complete.
2. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Pixel 11 runs Android 17 with Google’s Tensor G6, paired with 12GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. Its hardware is clearly designed around AI features and Google’s software optimization. The iPhone 17 uses Apple’s A19 chip with 8GB RAM and NVMe storage, targeting high performance and efficient iOS integration.
Raw specifications do not tell the entire story here. The A19 should have the edge for demanding workloads, gaming and sustained performance, while the Pixel’s additional RAM suits multitasking and AI-driven features. For users prioritizing conventional flagship performance, the iPhone 17 looks stronger. For Google’s AI-centric software experience, the Pixel 11 is arguably more interesting.
Battery and Charging
The Pixel 11 packs a substantially larger 4985mAh battery and supports 30W wired charging, 25W magnetic wireless charging and reverse wired charging. It also includes bypass charging, which can be useful during extended gaming sessions. The iPhone 17 has a smaller 3692mAh battery but supports wired fast charging and 25W MagSafe or Qi2 wireless charging.
Capacity alone does not determine endurance, and Apple’s chip and software efficiency can compensate for its smaller battery. Still, the Pixel 11 offers more charging flexibility and a much larger battery reserve. It is the more practical choice for heavy users who value battery capacity and features.
Verdict
The iPhone 17 wins performance, but the Pixel 11 wins battery hardware and charging flexibility. Overall, the Pixel suits heavy users better, while the iPhone remains stronger for demanding performance.
3. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
The Pixel 11 takes the more versatile approach with a 48MP main camera, 10.8MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, and 13MP ultrawide. Features such as Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR and Best Take add useful computational photography tools. The iPhone 17 pairs a 48MP main camera with a 48MP ultrawide, but lacks a dedicated telephoto lens.
That gives the Pixel 11 a clear advantage for zoom photography and shooting distant subjects. The iPhone 17, however, offers a stronger video package, including Dolby Vision HDR recording and a wider range of supported frame rates. For everyday photography, both should deliver excellent results, but the Pixel 11’s three-camera setup feels more complete.
Selfie Camera
The Pixel 11 uses a 10.5MP ultrawide selfie camera with PDAF and 4K video recording at up to 60fps. The iPhone 17 steps up to an 18MP multi-aspect front camera with PDAF, Dolby Vision HDR, 3D spatial audio and stereo sound recording.
The iPhone 17 is the stronger choice for selfies, video calls and social-media content, particularly for users who frequently record themselves. Its higher-resolution front camera and advanced video features give it greater flexibility. The Pixel 11 remains capable, but Apple’s front-camera system offers a more feature-rich experience for creators and everyday video use.
Verdict
The Pixel 11 wins for rear-camera versatility with its dedicated 5x telephoto, while the iPhone 17 leads for selfies and video. Overall, Pixel is the better pick for photography flexibility.
4. Pricing
The Pixel 11 is priced around $900 or ₹90,000, while the iPhone 17 is priced around $800 or ₹83,000. That gives the iPhone a meaningful price advantage despite offering a premium build, 120Hz OLED display, A19 processor and strong camera hardware.
The Pixel 11 justifies some of its premium through 12GB RAM, a larger battery, a dedicated 5x telephoto camera and 25W magnetic wireless charging. However, those additions may not matter equally to every buyer. The iPhone 17 delivers a broader flagship experience for less money, making it the easier recommendation for value-conscious buyers.
Is the price justified?
The Pixel 11 makes sense for buyers who specifically want Google’s software, AI capabilities, fingerprint unlocking, longer battery capacity and optical zoom. Those features create a distinctive package rather than simply adding higher specifications on paper. It is worthwhile for users who will actually use those advantages.
The iPhone 17 offers stronger conventional performance, a more advanced selfie system and excellent display technology at a lower price. That combination makes it the better value proposition overall. The Pixel’s premium is easier to justify for photography-focused Android users than for shoppers seeking the strongest all-round deal.
Verdict
The iPhone 17 offers better value at its lower price, combining stronger performance and multimedia features. The Pixel 11 earns its premium through zoom, battery capacity and Google’s software advantages.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
5. Conclusion
The Pixel 11 stands out with its Tensor G6 platform, 12GB RAM, 5x optical telephoto camera, ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, large battery, bypass charging and Google-centric AI experience. It is the more distinctive choice for Android users who value photography flexibility and practical power-user features.
The iPhone 17 counters with the A19 chip, Face ID, Ceramic Shield 2, Dolby Vision, an 18MP multi-aspect selfie camera and MagSafe or Qi2 charging. Its combination of performance, display quality and video capabilities makes it the more rounded mainstream flagship. For buyers who prioritize speed and polished content creation, the iPhone has the stronger overall package.
Verdict
The iPhone 17 is the overall winner, thanks to stronger performance, a sharper display, better selfie and video capabilities, and a lower price. The Pixel 11 is the better alternative for zoom photography, battery capacity, and Android flexibility.
FAQs
1. Is Pixel 11 better for photography than iPhone 17? Yes. Its dedicated 5x telephoto makes the Pixel 11 more versatile for zoom and distant subjects.
2. Which phone is faster, Pixel 11 or iPhone 17? The iPhone 17 is faster overall, particularly for demanding apps, gaming and sustained performance.
3. Does Pixel 11 have better battery life than iPhone 17? The Pixel 11 has a much larger battery, making it the stronger choice for heavy users.
4. Which phone offers better value for money? The iPhone 17 offers better value, combining flagship performance and features with a lower starting price.
5. Should you buy Pixel 11 or iPhone 17? Choose Pixel 11 for camera versatility and battery capacity; choose iPhone 17 for performance, video and overall value.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
Vivo is set to launch the X500 series in China on September 21st, and the countdown has come with a steady stream of certification sightings for the global versions. We’re now getting a fresh batch, with all three models turning up on Malaysia’s SIRIM database.
The base Vivo X500, carrying model number V2619, has already been certified on SIRIM, IMDA, and TUV. Joining it now are the X500 Pro Max (model V2610) and X500 Pro (model V2621).
A SIRIM listing doesn’t reveal much about the phones themselves. It’s mainly a regulatory requirement for electronics sold in Malaysia, so the latest filings mostly confirm the model numbers and show that Vivo is preparing the X500 series for the Malaysian market.
Vivo X500 series rundown
Vivo confirmed the X500 series launch date at its Creator Festival event in Yantai, where it also shared some details about the phones’ cameras. The X500 Pro models will be the first to use Vivo’s new BluePrint LightGuard 900 sensor, which is reportedly based on the Sony LYT-910. Vivo says the sensor can deliver up to 17EV of dynamic range.
The Pro models will also support 4K video recording at 240fps for slow-motion footage, along with 4K 120fps HDR video and 10-bit 4:2:2 encoding.
Vivo has also shown what the phones will look like. An official image of the X500 Pro Max shows a large circular camera module on the back, with the rear panel gently sloping around it. The Pro Max comes in black and orange, while official images of the full lineup reveal additional color options for all three models.
Vivo X500 Pro Max
The lineup is also expected to use a 64MP Sony LYT-610 sensor for the telephoto camera. Vivo is reportedly pairing it with CIPA 5.5-rated stabilization and support for a 200mm teleconverter accessory.
As for when you’ll be able to buy one outside China, there’s no word on that yet. Certification runs like this one usually show up weeks before an official global announcement, so expect the pace of these filings to pick up as September 21st gets closer.
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
The OnePlus 16 has been on shaky ground for the Indian market for some time, and a new leak suggests what OnePlus could offer instead. According to tipster Yogesh Brar, the OnePlus 16R could become the brand’s top phone in India next year, followed by the Nord series in the mid-range and the N series at the budget end.
OnePlus 16 alleged render
If the tip is accurate, India may not get a numbered OnePlus flagship next year, breaking from how OnePlus has run things in India for years, when a numbered flagship shipped alongside its R-series counterpart. For those unaware, the R-series traded the top chipset and camera hardware for a bigger battery and a lower price.
OnePlus R-series is usually a rebrand of Chinese models
The R-series itself has followed an interesting path. The OnePlus 12R was based on the China-exclusive OnePlus Ace 3, while the OnePlus 13R followed a similar approach with the OnePlus Ace 5. The pattern changed with the OnePlus 15R, which was based on the OnePlus Ace 6T instead of continuing from the Ace 5 series.
That makes it difficult to predict which China model could become the OnePlus 16R. OnePlus has yet to reveal anything about the Ace 7 series, so there is currently no clear model to link it to.
Meanwhile, the numbered OnePlus 16 is still expected to launch in China. It’s tipped to carry a 9,000mAh battery, the largest yet on a OnePlus flagship, and earlier leaks suggest a price hike over the OnePlus 15 in its home market.
Skipping India would carry more weight this time around, too. OnePlus has already pulled out of North America and Europe, so if it leaves the OnePlus 16 out of India as well, the phone ends up as a China-exclusive device with no major market outside its home turf.
However, those details may not matter much for Indian buyers if the OnePlus 16 remains exclusive to China. Nothing has been confirmed by OnePlus yet. The company has not commented on a possible change to its Indian lineup. Brar has a solid track record with OnePlus leaks, but for now, the leak should be treated with caution.
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
Casio has added a new line of analog watches to its global catalog. The MTP-E735AR series, which appeared on the company’s international website earlier this month, is a set of five quartz watches featuring integrated stainless steel bracelets and patterned dials. The watches are expected to launch in various markets, though Casio has not yet shared official pricing or exact availability details.
Edited (MTP-E735AR-2A2V)
Design Details
The design of the MTP-E735AR incorporates an integrated bracelet, a style where the watch case transitions directly into the metal band. The case is made of stainless steel with a brushed silver-tone finish. It measures 44.5mm lug-to-lug, 37.5mm across, and 8.4mm thick, resulting in a relatively compact and thin profile for everyday wear. The total weight of the watch with the stainless steel band is 89 grams.
For the dial, Casio is using an arabesque-style motif rather than a standard flat or sunburst finish. The swirling pattern covers the entire face and is paired with stylized hour markers. The series includes five color variants: black (MTP-E735AR-1AV), deep blue (2A1V), pale ice blue (2A2V), turquoise blue (2A3V), and white (7AV).
Four of the models use silver-tone hands and indices that match the case hardware. The white-dial variant uses blue hands and markers to maintain legibility against the lighter background.
Internally, the watches rely on a standard Casio quartz movement. They run on an SR920SW battery, which the company states will last for approximately three years before needing a replacement. The movement has an accuracy rating of ±20 seconds per month and includes a traditional three-hand timekeeping setup.
For daily utility, there is a day and date window positioned at the 3 o’clock mark. The day display is bilingual and can be toggled between English and Arabic. The dial is covered by standard mineral glass, and the case has a water resistance rating of 50 meters (5 bar). This rating means the watch can handle brief water exposure or surface swimming, though it is not intended for diving.
While pricing remains unconfirmed, the use of mineral glass and a basic quartz movement indicates that the MTP-E735AR series will likely be positioned as an entry-level option when it reaches retailers later this fall.
Citizen has updated its US storefront to include the Attesa CC4084-83Z, bringing the titanium watch to the US market. The company initially launched the watch in the UK earlier this week alongside the CC4085-81Z. While the CC4084-83Z was missing from the initial US rollout, it is now available to purchase directly from the manufacturer for $2,295.
The Attesa line focuses on autonomous timekeeping and power management. The CC4084-83Z operates on Citizen’s F950 caliber movement, which integrates the company’s Eco-Drive technology. This system charges the watch’s internal battery using ambient light, including standard indoor office lighting and natural sunlight, which eliminates the need for manual charging or physical battery replacements.
For time synchronization, the watch relies on Satellite Wave GPS. Rather than connecting to a smartphone via Bluetooth or receiving local radio tower signals, the watch communicates directly with GPS satellites. This allows the device to detect its location and automatically adjust to the correct local time zone anywhere in the world. The F950 movement also powers a perpetual calendar, dual time zone tracking, and standard chronograph features.
The watch features a 44.6mm case. To offset the weight typical of larger watches, Citizen uses titanium for both the case and the matching link bracelet. The metal is finished in a dark gunmetal color and treated with a Diamond-Like Carbon (DLC) coating to improve everyday scratch resistance.
Visually, the dark gunmetal hardware is paired with a green world-time bezel and a green-and-black dial. The layout includes gold-tone accents, prominent hour markers, and three sub-dials, resulting in a technical, aviation-inspired design.
The watch features an anti-reflective sapphire crystal and offers water resistance up to 100 meters, making it suitable for swimming and showering. Citizen is limiting global production of the CC4084-83Z to 1,500 unnumbered pieces.
Apple has taken a fair amount of flak over the years for how slowly its iPhones charge compared with a lot of Android phones that happily hit 100W or more. The new iPhone 18 Pro and 18 Pro Max finally speed things up a bit, but there’s a familiar catch if you want the full benefit.
Apple says the 18 Pro series can hit 50% in about 15 minutes. That’s roughly a quarter faster than the iPhone 17 Pro, which needed around 20 minutes for the same top-up. A quick five-minute charge is also claimed to give you about six hours of video playback. The improvement comes from higher peak power delivery.
Here’s the catch: you need a charger that supports peak 60W, USB Power Delivery 3.1, and Adjustable Voltage Supply (AVS). Apple’s own 40W Dynamic Power Adapter (which can output up to 60W) plus a compatible USB-C cable will get you those advertised speeds. Higher-wattage MacBook chargers, the 96W or 140W ones, don’t qualify because they lack the adjustable voltage feature. Plenty of popular third-party options over 40W, like some Anker 45W adapters, will still charge the phone, but they usually max out at the previous generation’s roughly 20-minute mark for 50%.
As usual, there’s no power adapter in the box, just a USB-C cable, so if you want the fastest wired speeds you’ll need to buy the Dynamic Power Adapter separately. Wireless charging gets a boost too: with a MagSafe charger and any 35W (or higher) adapter, you can reach 50% in about 30 minutes.
The upcoming foldable iPhone Duo, expected next month, supports the same faster speeds under the exact same conditions, so again you’ll need the right adapter for peak performance. It’s a welcome improvement, but the fact that the brand’s own higher-wattage MacBook chargers are not fully compatible with the 18 Pro series continues that long-running pattern of gating the top experience behind official accessories.
The good news is that Adjustable Voltage Supply isn’t some Apple-only proprietary standard. It’s an open protocol defined by the USB-IF, so any charger or power bank that properly supports PD 3.1 or newer should be able to deliver the peak power.
Creative has launched a new desktop soundbar in China, the Creative B3, which is currently listed on JD.com. The soundbar has a standard retail price of 429 yuan ($64), with an initial launch price set at 339 yuan ($50).
Inside the 420mm-wide unit, the B3 features a four-driver acoustic system. It uses a symmetrical two-way design, pairing two 58mm bass drivers with two 40mm high-frequency drivers. This configuration separates the low and high frequencies to maintain audio clarity during media playback and gaming.
The system is managed by an Actions Semiconductor audio chipset with a 32-bit processing core and a DSP programmed for gaming audio. It has a frequency response range of 20Hz to 20kHz and delivers a peak output of 20W. The power output is divided into 4W for the left and right channels, and 6W for each of the two subwoofer channels.
The soundbar supports Bluetooth 6.0, utilizing a wireless transmission chip designed to reduce audio latency and keep game audio synchronized with on-screen visuals. Alongside the wireless option, the rear panel includes ports for USB-C, optical, and 3.5mm AUX connections.
This allows the B3 to connect to PCs, macOS devices, smartphones, and TVs. It is also compatible with the PlayStation 5 and Nintendo Switch, though it requires users to switch the soundbar to a dedicated console mode for those systems.
For voice communication, Creative included a built-in omnidirectional microphone with noise-reduction capabilities to filter out background noise during multiplayer sessions.
On the front panel, a spherical control unit combines a rotary dial and touch controls. This hub manages power, volume, media playback, and the circular RGB lighting, which can be disabled entirely via a dedicated button. The control dial also allows users to switch between four EQ presets. The B3 measures 420 x 87 x 87.4mm and weighs 1.28kg, fitting under most standard monitors.
Xiaomi is currently taking pre-orders in China for a new desktop monitor, the Redmi Monitor A27U Type-C 120Hz 2027. It costs 1,699 yuan (about $253), making it a relatively affordable option for people who want one screen that can handle both daily work and gaming.
The monitor uses a 27-inch 4K IPS panel with slim bezels on three sides. It has a standard 1500:1 contrast ratio and a typical brightness of 400 nits, which meets the basic DisplayHDR 400 certification.
Instead of sticking to a single refresh rate, it offers a dual-mode setup. For regular desktop use and content creation, it runs at its native 4K resolution at 120Hz. If you want to play games and prefer higher frame rates over resolution, you can switch it to a 1080p mode that runs at 240Hz.
For color, the screen covers 100% of the sRGB gamut and 98% of DCI-P3. Xiaomi says each monitor is calibrated at the factory to ensure an average Delta E of less than 1. If you use a Mac, there is a specific M Mode designed to match Apple‘s Display P3 color output. This should help keep colors looking consistent when you plug in a MacBook or iPad.
To reduce glare from windows or office lights, the screen has an anti-reflective coating that Xiaomi says brings overall reflectance down to 2.6 percent. It also includes standard eye-care features, like DC dimming to prevent screen flickering and a hardware-level blue light filter certified by TÜV Rheinland.
You can connect a laptop to the monitor using a single USB-C cable, which handles video and data while providing up to 90W of power to keep your computer charged. The back of the monitor also includes two HDMI 2.1 ports, one DisplayPort 1.4, two USB 2.0 ports for basic accessories, and a standard headphone jack.
The included stand lets you adjust the height, tilt, and swivel, and you can rotate the screen vertically into portrait mode. The monitor is available for pre-order in China now and comes with a three-year warranty.
Google Pixel 11 Pro and OPPO Find X9 Pro take very different approaches to the premium Android phone. The Pixel focuses on computational photography, clean software, long-term updates, and Google’s custom Tensor platform, while OPPO pushes hardware with a huge battery, faster charging, and an unusually capable 200MP telephoto camera.
This comparison matters because both phones sit around the same flagship price range, yet prioritize different strengths. The Pixel 11 Pro looks more appealing for software longevity and photography, while the Find X9 Pro is built for buyers who want maximum hardware value. The better choice ultimately depends on whether refinement or raw hardware flexibility matters more.
Both phones use premium glass construction with aluminum frames and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection on the front. They also offer IP68 water and dust resistance, while the Find X9 Pro adds IP69 protection for greater resistance to high-pressure water jets. Both feature ultrasonic in-display fingerprint sensors and stereo speakers. The OPPO feels more feature-packed from a durability perspective, although the Pixel’s design remains more understated and cohesive.
The Pixel 11 Pro also offers UWB, which expands its potential for device tracking and ecosystem features. OPPO counters with an infrared port, making the Find X9 Pro more useful as a universal remote. Neither phone has a headphone jack. For everyday flagship use, both are well equipped, but OPPO delivers a slightly broader hardware feature set.
Display Quality
The Pixel 11 Pro has a 6.3-inch LTPO OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and up to 3,600 nits peak brightness. Its higher pixel density should produce exceptionally crisp text and images, while adaptive refresh rates help balance smoothness and efficiency. It is particularly well suited to users who prefer a compact flagship screen.
The Find X9 Pro counters with a larger 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display supporting Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 1 billion colors, and 3,600 nits peak brightness. Its 2,160Hz PWM dimming can also be easier on sensitive eyes. For movies and gaming, OPPO’s larger canvas feels more immersive, while Pixel wins for compact usability.
Verdict
OPPO Find X9 Pro wins the display section for its larger panel, Dolby Vision, richer format support, and high-frequency PWM dimming. Pixel remains preferable for buyers who value a smaller flagship screen.
2. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Pixel 11 Pro uses Google’s Tensor G6, built on a 3nm process, paired with up to 16GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. Its seven-core design is optimized around Google’s software and AI workloads rather than headline specifications alone. The phone should therefore feel particularly well integrated for everyday tasks, photography processing, and Pixel-exclusive AI features.
The Find X9 Pro uses the 3nm Dimensity 9500 with an octa-core CPU, Arm G1-Ultra graphics, up to 16GB RAM, and faster UFS 4.1 storage. On paper, its configuration is more performance-oriented and better suited to demanding gaming and sustained workloads. OPPO has the stronger hardware proposition here, especially for users who prioritize raw performance.
Battery capacity is one of the biggest differences. The Pixel 11 Pro packs a 4,850mAh battery with 30W wired charging and 25W magnetic wireless charging. It also supports reverse wired charging and bypass charging. Google’s software optimization should help, but the charging hardware is conservative for a modern flagship.
OPPO dramatically raises the bar with a 7,500mAh silicon-carbon battery, 80W wired charging, and 50W wireless charging. It also supports 10W reverse wireless charging. The difference is substantial in practical terms, giving the Find X9 Pro much greater endurance potential and faster top-ups. OPPO clearly feels more practical for heavy users.
Verdict
OPPO Find X9 Pro wins comfortably, combining a much larger battery with 80W wired and 50W wireless charging. Pixel’s charging features are useful, but OPPO offers substantially better hardware value.
3. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
The Pixel 11 Pro combines a 50MP main camera, 48MP 5x periscope telephoto, and 48MP ultrawide. Google adds features such as Best Take, Zoom Enhance, Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR, and multi-zone laser autofocus. The long 5x optical zoom is particularly useful for distant subjects and complements Pixel’s computational photography approach.
The Find X9 Pro uses a 50MP f/1.5 main camera, 200MP 3x periscope telephoto, and 50MP ultrawide. Its large telephoto sensor and high resolution give it considerable cropping flexibility, while Hasselblad color calibration and LOG video target enthusiasts. OPPO has the more ambitious camera hardware, but Pixel’s processing could produce more consistently polished results.
Selfie Camera
Google equips the Pixel 11 Pro with a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera featuring PDAF and 4K video recording at up to 60fps. The wider field of view makes it particularly useful for group selfies and video calls, while autofocus should improve consistency compared with fixed-focus alternatives.
OPPO uses a 50MP wide selfie camera with PDAF, a 21mm equivalent field of view, and 4K recording at up to 60fps. It offers strong hardware on paper, while gyro-EIS adds stabilization for video. OPPO’s higher-resolution sensor is appealing, but Pixel’s ultrawide framing gives it greater flexibility. Both are strong selfie systems.
Verdict
The Pixel 11 Pro wins for computational photography and its versatile 5x zoom, while OPPO offers stronger camera hardware. For predictable point-and-shoot results, Pixel has the edge.
4. Pricing
The Pixel 11 Pro is priced around $1,100 or ₹120,000, while the OPPO Find X9 Pro is priced around $1,000 or ₹100,000. That gives OPPO a meaningful price advantage despite offering a larger battery, faster charging, and a 200MP periscope telephoto camera.
The gap becomes more significant when the hardware is considered as a package. Pixel’s premium is easier to understand if long-term software support, Google’s ecosystem, and computational photography are priorities. However, buyers primarily comparing specifications get considerably more hardware from OPPO for less money. On pure hardware value, the Find X9 Pro looks difficult to beat.
Is the price justified?
The Pixel 11 Pro can justify its higher price through seven major Android updates, Google’s software experience, AI features, and camera processing. Those advantages matter to buyers intending to keep a phone for many years rather than upgrading frequently.
The Find X9 Pro offers five major Android updates, which is still substantial, but falls behind Google’s commitment. However, its stronger charging system, enormous battery, premium camera hardware, and broader feature set make its lower price especially compelling. OPPO delivers more physical hardware for the money, while Pixel makes a stronger case through software longevity.
Verdict
The OPPO Find X9 Pro offers better value for money, thanks to its lower price and substantially stronger battery and charging hardware. Pixel earns its premium through software longevity and camera processing.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
5. Conclusion
The Pixel 11 Pro stands out with seven major Android updates, Tensor G6 processing, UWB, satellite SOS, magnetic Qi2.2 wireless charging, and Google’s computational photography features. Its 5x periscope also gives it a different imaging strategy from OPPO’s high-resolution 3x telephoto. It is the more software-focused flagship, designed around Google’s ecosystem and long-term ownership.
The Find X9 Pro answers with a 7,500mAh silicon-carbon battery, 80W wired charging, 50W wireless charging, IP69 protection, an IR blaster, and a 200MP periscope camera. Its hardware package is unusually aggressive for the price. For demanding users, frequent travelers, gamers, and anyone prioritizing endurance, OPPO offers more immediately useful hardware.
Verdict
Overall winner: OPPO Find X9 Pro. Its bigger battery, faster charging, versatile camera hardware, stronger durability, and lower price make it the more compelling all-round flagship. Pixel 11 Pro remains the better choice for long-term software support and computational photography.
FAQs
1. Which phone has the better camera, Pixel 11 Pro or Find X9 Pro? The Pixel 11 Pro offers stronger computational photography, while OPPO provides more ambitious camera hardware and a 200MP telephoto.
2. Is the Pixel 11 Pro faster than the Find X9 Pro? The Find X9 Pro has the stronger performance-focused chipset configuration, making it the better choice for demanding workloads and gaming.
3. Which phone has better battery life? The Find X9 Pro should deliver longer battery life thanks to its significantly larger 7,500mAh battery.
4. Which phone offers better value for money? The Find X9 Pro offers better value with a lower price and a stronger overall hardware package.
5. Should you buy the Pixel 11 Pro or Find X9 Pro? Choose the Pixel for software longevity and Google’s camera processing; choose OPPO for battery, charging, performance, and hardware value.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL and OPPO Find X9 Pro take different approaches to the premium Android phone. Pixel emphasizes computational photography, clean software, and long-term updates, while OPPO pushes hardware with a huge battery, faster charging, and a 200MP telephoto camera. The comparison matters for buyers deciding whether Google’s software experience or OPPO’s hardware advantage is more compelling.
The Pixel 11 Pro XL combines Gorilla Glass Victus 2 with an aluminum frame and an IP68 rating, giving it a familiar premium flagship design. OPPO uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the front, a glass rear, aluminum frame, and stronger IP68/IP69 protection. Both offer ultrasonic fingerprint readers and stereo speakers, but OPPO feels more practically equipped for demanding everyday use.
The Pixel has a slightly larger 6.8-inch LTPO OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and up to 3600 nits peak brightness. OPPO counters with a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display supporting Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, and 2160Hz PWM. Pixel’s higher resolution is appealing, while OPPO’s broader HDR support makes its screen more versatile.
Verdict
OPPO Find X9 Pro edges the display and durability category with IP69 protection, Dolby Vision, and an excellent AMOLED experience. Pixel remains compelling for sharper resolution and Google’s polished display tuning.
2. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Pixel 11 Pro XL uses Google’s Tensor G6, paired with up to 16GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. OPPO uses the Dimensity 9500, also reaching 16GB RAM, with faster UFS 4.1 storage. OPPO’s flagship MediaTek chip looks stronger for demanding performance, while Pixel’s Tensor advantage lies more in Google’s AI-focused software integration.
Battery and Charging
This is where OPPO pulls decisively ahead. Its 7500mAh silicon-carbon battery supports 80W wired and 50W wireless charging, alongside 10W reverse wireless charging. Pixel’s 5115mAh battery supports 45W wired and 25W magnetic wireless charging, plus bypass charging. OPPO offers substantially more endurance and faster charging, making it the more practical choice for heavy users.
OPPO Find X9 Pro wins the specifications and battery section. Its Dimensity 9500, UFS 4.1 storage, massive 7500mAh battery, and faster charging create a stronger hardware package.
3. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Pixel’s triple-camera system pairs a 50MP main camera with a 48MP 5x periscope and 48MP ultrawide. OPPO uses a 50MP main sensor, 200MP 3x periscope, and 50MP ultrawide. Pixel offers greater native telephoto reach, while OPPO’s enormous 200MP telephoto sensor promises stronger detail and cropping flexibility. For versatile zoom photography, both are unusually well equipped.
Selfie Camera
The Pixel features a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera with PDAF and 4K video recording, while OPPO uses a 50MP wide selfie camera with PDAF and 4K recording. Pixel’s wider perspective can suit group shots and framing, but OPPO’s higher-resolution sensor gives it a stronger hardware advantage. Pixel’s image processing could still make the real-world comparison closer.
Verdict
Pixel 11 Pro XL wins for its 5x optical telephoto and established computational photography approach. OPPO is the more exciting hardware package, particularly for users who prioritize detailed zoom and camera versatility.
4. Pricing
The Pixel 11 Pro XL is priced around $1300 or ₹135,000, while the OPPO Find X9 Pro is priced around $1000 or ₹100,000. That creates a significant gap between two premium phones with broadly comparable flagship ambitions. Pixel asks buyers to pay more for Google’s software ecosystem and longer update commitment.
Pixel’s premium is easier to justify for buyers who prioritize seven major Android updates, Google’s AI features, Pixel photography, and a clean Android experience. OPPO offers substantially more battery capacity, faster charging, stronger storage, and an impressive 200MP telephoto for less money. For hardware-focused buyers, OPPO clearly offers better value.
Verdict
OPPO Find X9 Pro is the stronger value choice. Its lower price combined with a larger battery, faster charging, and impressive camera hardware makes the premium paid for Pixel harder to justify.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
5. Conclusion
The Pixel 11 Pro XL stands out with seven major OS updates, Tensor G6, Google’s computational photography, 5x optical zoom, magnetic Qi2.2 charging, UWB, and Satellite SOS. OPPO counters with a 7500mAh silicon-carbon battery, 80W charging, 50W wireless charging, IP69 protection, an infrared port, and a 200MP periscope. Each targets a different definition of a flagship.
Verdict
OPPO Find X9 Pro is the overall winner. It delivers stronger hardware, dramatically better battery endurance, faster charging, excellent cameras, and lower pricing, making it the more complete value-focused flagship.
FAQs
1. Which phone has the better camera, Pixel 11 Pro XL or OPPO Find X9 Pro? The Pixel excels at computational photography, while OPPO offers impressive zoom hardware and greater sensor resolution.
2. Is the OPPO Find X9 Pro faster than Pixel 11 Pro XL? Yes. Its Dimensity 9500 is better suited to demanding gaming and sustained performance.
3. Which phone has better battery life? The OPPO Find X9 Pro should last longer, thanks to its substantially larger 7500mAh battery.
4. Is Pixel 11 Pro XL worth the higher price? It can be for buyers prioritizing Google’s software, AI features, camera processing, and longer update support.
5. Which phone should you buy overall? Choose OPPO for hardware and value; choose Pixel for Google’s software experience and computational photography.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
