A new budget feature phone from HMD is on its way for people who just want something simple and reliable for calls and basic use. Leaked details suggest it’s an upgraded take on an existing model, focused on practical improvements.
Tipster smashx_60 has shared info on the HMD 102 4G Pro, which builds directly on the regular HMD 102 4G. The main upgrade is dual SIM dual standby with LTE support, so you can keep two lines active with 4G for clearer calls and some basic internet activity. That makes it a bit more flexible for anyone who needs dual-network capability without dealing with a full smartphone.
It keeps the same compact size and comes with IP52 protection against dust and light splashes. Up front there’s a 2-inch LCD with 160×120 resolution. The rear camera gets a small but noticeable bump to 0.3 MP (300,000 pixels), up from the standard model’s 0.08 MP, so it should be relatively better for basic snaps.
Inside, it runs on a Unisoc 8910FF-S processor. Memory gets modest upgrades: RAM goes from 16 MB to 24 MB, and storage doubles from 24 MB to 48 MB. The battery also edges up from 1,000 mAh to 1,200 mAh, which should help with standby and talk time. These changes keep it firmly in the ultra-cheap feature phone category while fixing a few of the base model’s limitations.
Other leaked details mention microSD support, Bluetooth, a 3.5 mm headphone jack, and the S30+ operating system, the usual simple software with an MP3 player and games like Snake. The Pro version looks aimed at markets where tough, long-lasting basic phones are still popular, whether as a secondary device or for older users.
Pricing and exact availability haven’t been confirmed yet since this is still a leak. But the upgrades suggest HMD is slowly improving its low-cost 4G feature phone range to better handle dual-SIM LTE needs in a no-frills package.
Samsung has been one of the best Android brands for offering longer, timely software updates. The brand promises seven years of updates to its newer high-end phones and tablets. Even most mid-range Galaxy phones now come with software support for 6 years, raising the bar when many brands are still offering 5 years of updates to their high-end phones.
Galaxy devices launched in the last year or two should still have a long way before they reach the end of the road. However, many of those launched in 2021 and 2022 are reaching the point where they will stop receiving all kinds of updates, including One UI updates and security patches. Based on the update policy, Sammyfans has prepared a list of such devices. Review it below to find out if you may need an upgrade soon.
Galaxy phones nearing the end of software support
Device
Launch date
End of Android updates
End of security updates
Galaxy Z Fold 3
August 2021
August 2025 (ended)
August 2026
Galaxy Z Flip 3
August 2021
August 2025 (ended)
August 2026
Galaxy S21 FE 5G
January 2022
January 2026 (ended)
January 2027
Galaxy S22
February 2022
February 2026 (ended)
February 2027
Galaxy S22+
February 2022
February 2026 (ended)
February 2027
Galaxy S22 Ultra
February 2022
February 2026 (ended)
February 2027
Galaxy A53 5G
April 2022
April 2026 (ended)
April 2027
Galaxy A14
May 2023
May 2025 (ended)
May 2027
Galaxy Z Fold 4
August 2022
August 2026
August 2027
Galaxy Z Flip 4
August 2022
August 2026
August 2027
Galaxy S23
February 2023
February 2027
February 2028
Galaxy S23+
February 2023
February 2027
February 2028
Galaxy S23 Ultra
February 2023
February 2027
February 2028
Galaxy A54 5G
March 2023
March 2027
March 2028
Samsung doesn’t publish such a list. It’s been prepared after reviewing the official update policy for Galaxy devices. Even when a device reaches the end of its life, users aren’t notified. So, it’s best to keep yourself in check.
Even when a device reaches the end of its life, it continues to work just fine. However, it won’t receive any kind of software updates. Not only do users miss out on the latest features and visual changes, but they also don’t receive fixes to discovered security vulnerabilities via monthly security patches.
The best move is to find a reliable upgrade with long-term software support. You can see the list of Samsung devices that promise seven years of updates or six years of updates to find potential upgrade options.
We’ll update this post regularly with the latest information. You can bookmark the page or join our Telegram channel to never miss an update.
Samsung has updated the official out-of-warranty screen repair prices for its newest foldables, the Galaxy Z Fold 8, Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, and Galaxy Z Flip 8. The numbers give a clearer idea of how much it could cost if something goes wrong with the flexible displays.
Starting with the most expensive repair, a full inner screen module replacement, the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra comes in at $639 (or Rs 59,670). The regular Galaxy Z Fold 8 is $579 (or Rs 54,130) for the same job, while the Galaxy Z Flip 8 is $359 (or Rs 26,760). These are the repairs that cover the more complex folding inner displays.
Outer screen repairs are much cheaper. Replacing the cover display costs $149 on the Fold 8 Ultra, $139 on the standard Fold 8, and $129 on the Flip 8. That makes sense – the outer screens are simpler than the folding panels.
Looking at last year’s prices, there’s a noticeable jump on the Fold side. The Galaxy Z Fold 7’s inner screen repair was listed at $449, which is quite a bit lower than what the Fold 8 models are now charging. Samsung does note that the repair categories are different this year, so it’s not a perfect one-to-one comparison. On the Flip side, the Galaxy Z Flip 7’s inner repair was $249, so the Flip 8’s $359 is a clear step up.
Outer screen prices haven’t moved as much. The Fold 7 outer repair was the same $139 as this year’s Fold 8. The Flip 7 outer repair was $119, only $10 less than the Flip 8’s $129.
Overall, the new pricing shows that while outer displays are still relatively cheap to fix, a damaged inner screen on the premium Fold models can cost almost as much as a mid-range phone. Anyone using a new Galaxy Z Fold 8 or Flip 8 might want to look into something like Samsung Care+, which can bring those out-of-pocket costs down a lot. The official numbers are up on Samsung’s support sites if you want to check them yourself.
Timex has officially launched a trio of new Automatic E Line watches in the US, reviving a classic 1983 dress watch design. The new lineup leans heavily into the current industry trend of retro reissues, utilizing a rounded square case, often referred to by watch enthusiasts as a TV Dial, while upgrading the internals with a standard Japanese automatic movement.
Design Details
The new E Line models feature a 38mm stainless steel case, stepping up slightly in size to meet modern wrist preferences while retaining the original vintage silhouette. The watches measure 45.5mm lug-to-lug with a case thickness of 12.5mm.
Timex is offering three distinct variations for this release: a silver-tone model with a horizontally textured blue dial (TW6A00700), a silver-tone model with a matching silver dial (TW6A00500), and a two-tone stainless steel variant with a silver dial (TW6A00600).
Across all three models, the dial design remains uniform. Timex has opted for a clean layout featuring a horizontal texture, distinct applied hour markers, a basic printed minute track, and a date window positioned at 3 o’clock.
Inside the case, Timex is using the Miyota caliber 8215. This is a well-known, entry-level Japanese automatic movement featuring 21 jewels and a 40-hour power reserve. It operates via the natural motion of the wearer’s wrist, though it can also be hand-wound via the crown. Timex has included an exhibition case back, allowing users to view the mechanical movement in action.
For the hardware, the watches are fitted with a stainless steel bracelet that tapers down to a butterfly deployant clasp, designed to create a seamless look when closed on the wrist.
The dial is protected by a vintage-style flat mineral crystal, and the case carries a water resistance rating of 50 meters, making it suitable for light splashes but not intended for swimming or diving.
Pricing and Availability
The standard silver-tone models are priced at $379, while the two-tone version costs $399. All three are listed on the Timex US website, with two currently available for pre-order and one available for purchase.
Google Pixel 11 Pro XL and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra take very different approaches to the flagship smartphone experience. Google leans into AI, computational photography and a clean Android experience, while Samsung pushes hardware versatility with a powerful Snapdragon chip, S Pen, DeX and a more flexible camera system. With both phones targeting the same premium segment, the real question is not which is more expensive, but which flagship delivers more for the way you use your phone.
The Google Pixel 11 Pro XL uses a glass front and back with an aluminum frame, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 and IP68 protection. Samsung uses Gorilla Armor 2 on the front, Victus 2 on the rear and Armor Aluminum 2. Both deliver a premium flagship feel, but Samsung has a slight edge with its tougher front glass and more advanced anti-reflective treatment.
Display Quality
The Pixel 11 Pro XL features a 6.8-inch LTPO OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, 1344 x 2992 resolution and up to 3600 nits peak brightness. The Galaxy S26 Ultra has a 6.9-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X panel with 1440 x 3120 resolution, 120Hz refresh rate and 2600 nits peak brightness. Samsung also adds DX anti-reflective coating and Privacy Display, making it more versatile for outdoor use and sensitive content.
Samsung wins the display category for its sharper panel, anti-reflective coating and Privacy Display. Pixel offers higher peak brightness, but Galaxy S26 Ultra feels more polished for everyday viewing.
2. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Pixel 11 Pro XL runs Android 17 and is powered by Google’s Tensor G6 chipset, paired with up to 16GB RAM and 1TB storage. The Galaxy S26 Ultra uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 with up to 16GB RAM and 1TB storage. Samsung’s flagship Qualcomm platform has the stronger performance profile for demanding gaming, sustained workloads and intensive multitasking, while Tensor focuses heavily on AI-powered experiences.
Battery and Charging
Pixel packs a 5115mAh battery with 45W wired charging, 25W magnetic Qi2.2 wireless charging, reverse wired charging and bypass charging. Samsung has a 5000mAh battery with faster 60W wired charging, 25W Qi2.2 wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless charging. Pixel has the larger battery, but Samsung’s faster wired charging is more practical when a quick top-up is needed.
Samsung takes the performance category with its Snapdragon chipset and faster wired charging. Pixel counters with a slightly larger battery and bypass charging, making it appealing for users who prioritise endurance and sustained device use.
3. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
The Pixel 11 Pro XL features a 50MP main camera, 48MP 5x periscope telephoto and 48MP ultrawide camera. Samsung offers a more extensive setup with a 200MP main sensor, 10MP 3x telephoto, 50MP 5x periscope and 50MP ultrawide. Samsung therefore provides more focal-length flexibility, while Pixel relies on computational photography features such as Best Take and Zoom Enhance.
Selfie Camera
Pixel has a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera with PDAF and 4K video recording at 30 and 60fps. Samsung uses a 12MP front camera with dual-pixel PDAF and 4K recording at 30 and 60fps. The Pixel’s higher-resolution ultrawide sensor is better suited to detailed selfies and group shots, while Samsung delivers a more conventional front-camera experience with strong video support.
Verdict
Samsung wins overall because its four-camera system offers greater versatility across different focal lengths. Pixel remains more attractive for computational photography and high-resolution ultrawide selfies, especially for users who value Google’s imaging software.
4. Pricing
The Google Pixel 11 Pro XL is priced around $1300 / ₹135,000, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is priced around $1300 / ₹140,000. Their US pricing is almost identical, although Samsung commands a roughly ₹5,000 higher price in India. At this level, both phones compete directly as premium flagship devices with extensive hardware and software features.
Pixel justifies its price through Tensor G6, Android 17, advanced computational photography, a large battery and Google-focused AI features. Samsung offers a broader hardware package with Snapdragon performance, S Pen support, DeX, a more versatile camera system and a sophisticated display. The Galaxy therefore provides more functionality for users who want their phone to cover productivity as well as entertainment.
Verdict
Pixel offers strong value for Google-focused users, but Samsung provides more hardware versatility at almost the same global price. The Galaxy S26 Ultra is easier to justify for power users seeking an all-round flagship.
5. Conclusion
The Pixel 11 Pro XL stands out with Android 17, Tensor G6, Google’s computational photography features, a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera, a 5115mAh battery and magnetic Qi2.2 charging. Samsung counters with S Pen support, Samsung DeX, Privacy Display, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 performance and four rear cameras covering multiple focal lengths.
The Pixel feels better suited to users who prefer Google’s software approach, AI features and photography processing. The Galaxy S26 Ultra is more compelling for power users who want gaming performance, productivity tools, flexible photography and desktop-style capabilities from one device.
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is the stronger all-round flagship thanks to its performance, camera versatility, S Pen, DeX and display features. The Pixel 11 Pro XL remains the better choice for Google-first software and computational photography.
In a recent report, reliable tipster Digital Chat Station shared key details about the iQOO 16’s display, chipset, and design. Now, the tipster has published a new Weibo post revealing more about the phone’s camera setup. While the iQOO 16 is expected to remain focused primarily on performance, it may not be positioned as a camera-centric flagship. Still, the latest leak suggests that iQOO could be giving its upcoming phone a more capable camera system than expected, with all three rear sensors reportedly getting a 50-megapixel resolution.
iQOO 16 camera setup could be a big step up
The new leak by DCS suggests that the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro-powered iQOO 16 is being evaluated with three 50-megapixel rear cameras. The primary sensor reportedly measures 1/1.3-inch and is paired with an f/1.68 aperture, making it the largest and brightest camera in the setup. He has previously claimed that it could feature the OmniVision OV50Q sensor as the primary snapper.
The ultra-wide camera is said to use another 50-megapixel sensor with an f/2.0 aperture. Meanwhile, the periscope telephoto camera reportedly has a 1/1.95-inch 50-megapixel sensor and an f/2.65 aperture. DCS also notes that the lens arrangement appears to follow an inverted design, while the exact telephoto and macro capabilities are still being determined.
iQOO 15
The same source has previously claimed that the iQOO 16 will flaunt a 6.85-inch Samsung-made flat display with 2K resolution and a 165Hz refresh rate. The phone could also pack an 8,500mAh battery with 100W wired charging and wireless charging.
Other rumored specifications include a dedicated display chip, 3D ultrasonic fingerprint recognition, 1115-series symmetrical dual speakers, a 0916-series X-axis linear motor, IP68 and IP69 ratings, USB 3.2 connectivity and an AR coating. The iQOO 16 is expected to arrive in China around the end of September or early October.
The rumor mill has been consistently leaking details about the OnePlus 16, and the latest one points to a major display upgrade. The upcoming flagship is reportedly being developed with a new custom material and circuit design, with the improvements expected to focus on power efficiency, durability, and smoother overall performance.
OnePlus 16 tipped to feature custom X4 display material
According to well-known tipster Digital Chat Station, OnePlus and BOE have jointly developed a new X4 light-emitting material for the OnePlus 16. Internal testing reportedly shows the material outperforming Samsung’s M-series panels across nearly all key metrics, although exact figures have not been disclosed.
The X4 material is said to deliver extremely low power consumption while also doubling the lifespan compared to the previous generation. This improved efficiency could be especially important for a high-refresh-rate flagship, where maintaining smooth performance typically increases power usage. A longer lifespan could also help ensure more consistent brightness and display quality over time.
The OnePlus 16 is also expected to stick with a flat display design while introducing ultra-thin bezels on all four sides. OnePlus has already been working closely with BOE on recent flagship screens, with the OnePlus 15 featuring a 165Hz third-generation Oriental Screen and a custom X3 light-emitting material.
The X4 upgrade reportedly goes beyond just the display material itself. The new material and updated circuit design are said to enable additional smoothness-focused features, along with several high-end display technologies that could push panel performance further. However, key details such as resolution, peak brightness, and the final refresh rate have not yet been revealed.
The OnePlus 16 is also expected to bring major gaming-related improvements. OnePlus China president Li Jie previously confirmed that the company’s three exclusive gaming technologies will receive significant upgrades on the next flagship, including a 185Hz high-refresh-rate display, the Fengchi gaming engine, and e-sports triple-core technology.
As for the launch, the OnePlus 16, which reportedly carries the model number PYB110, has already secured an important certification in China. The flagship is expected to make its debut in October.
Lenovo’s next compact gaming tablet is showing up a bit earlier than expected. Real-world photos of the Legion Y700 Infinite have started circulating online, giving us a proper look at its front and back design just days before the official launch.
The images, shared on Weibo on August 15, show the tablet in what looks like a store setting. It’s finished in a dark blue colour, has clear Legion branding, and looks properly compact when held in landscape. One shot shows the front with Lenovo’s Android interface running, while another reveals a single rear camera with an LED flash next to it.
Lenovo has confirmed the Legion Y700 Infinite will launch in China on August 25. Two of the biggest upgrades over the previous model stand out: an 8.4-inch OLED display and native 5G support. The OLED panel runs at 2,560 x 1,600 resolution, 165 Hz refresh rate, and a 3,400 Hz touch sampling rate, so it should feel smooth and responsive for gaming. Power comes from an overclocked Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, which Lenovo says can hit an AnTuTu score of 4,585,844.
To keep the boosted chip cool, the tablet is expected to use a fairly large 15,000 mm² vapor chamber. Other leaked details fill in the rest of the picture. RAM and storage options are said to start at 12 GB + 256 GB and go up to 24 GB + 1 TB. There’s talk of a 7,470 mAh battery with 68 W charging, an 8 MP front camera, and a 50 MP rear camera. The body is tipped to measure around 6.5 mm thick and weigh about 298 grams, with dual USB-C ports and a fingerprint reader also expected.
Lenovo has also confirmed it will work with accessories like the G9 controller and the CR7 Supreme Cooler Kit, an external semiconductor-based cooling accessory. Pricing and any international plans should become clearer at the August 25 event.
iQOO’s latest official teaser for the Neo11 Ultra is all about the camera. They’ve confirmed a 50MP “ultra-stabilized” large Sony sensor as the main camera. The teaser also mentions “new native light and shadow effects,” which probably points to smarter image processing. Overall, it hints at more realistic depth and contrast.
The Live Photo feature gets a proper upgrade too: higher quality, plus support for stabilization, beautification, and filters. The main camera is paired with an 8MP ultrawide, while selfies are handled by a 16MP front camera. So it’s a simple dual-rear setup on the back, but the brand is clearly focusing on the main camera hardware and the processing improvements.
As proof, the teaser includes three high-resolution images, most likely shot on the main camera, including a night shot. The first photo is a portrait. Only when you zoom in do you notice a bit of overlap on some individual strands of hair. Apart from that, the subject separation looks clean, and the colors and noise control are both impressive. There’s no major over-sharpening anywhere in the frame.
The second shot is outdoors in daylight, and as expected it looks solid. Saturation and texture on the subject are nicely balanced, the kind of photo you’d share without touching it. The third image has a bit more colour punch, but it doesn’t tip into looking oversaturated or dull.
It’s hard to judge the exact colour temperature in the yellow-light areas, but overall it still looks good enough to post as-is. The Live Photo sample also holds up well, with a decent amount of detail visible in the individual frames.
The phone goes on sale on August 18 in China. From the specs that have been floating around (and the earlier official teases), it’s very much a performance-first device. It’s powered by the Dimensity 9500M with an 11-core GPU, plus iQOO’s own Q2 gaming chip for an extra boost in games. The display is a 6.83-inch 2K 144Hz LTPS flat panel using Visionox’s F2 material, and it can hit 1,000 nits full-screen when you max the brightness manually. Touch is handled by a Synopsys S3910V controller.
Timex has just released three new watches in its Quartz E Line, bringing back a design originally introduced in 1983. The defining feature of these new models is the rounded square case, a shape watch enthusiasts often refer to as the TV Dial because of its resemblance to old cathode-ray tube televisions.
Instead of scaling the watch up to fit modern oversized trends, Timex has gone smaller. These new E Line models feature a compact 30mm stainless steel case. It is a straightforward, retro-leaning dress watch that fits into the recent industry shift back toward smaller, more wearable case sizes.
There are three specific models in this release. The base version (TW6A01000) comes in a standard brushed and polished silver-tone stainless steel finish with a light pink sunray dial, and it is priced at $269. For a slight premium at $289, you have two additional options: a full gold-tone version (TW6A00900) and a two-tone silver and gold variant (TW6A00800). Both of the $289 models are paired with a champagne sunray dial.
Inside, the hardware is very standard. The watches run on a basic battery-powered quartz movement, so they will keep accurate time without needing to be wound. The case dimensions are fairly slim, measuring 8.5mm thick with a 36.5mm lug-to-lug distance, meaning they will sit flat against the wrist. The dial is protected by a flat mineral glass crystal and features simple hour markers alongside a basic printed minute track.
For the strap, Timex is using a 10mm stainless steel bracelet that secures with a butterfly deployant clasp. This type of clasp folds inward on both sides, which hides the locking mechanism and makes the bracelet look like one continuous piece of metal when it is closed. According to Timex, the band is adjustable to fit wrist sizes between 5.3 and 7.5 inches.
As for everyday durability, the watches have a 50-meter water resistance rating. That is enough to survive washing your hands, getting caught in the rain, or some very light swimming, but it is not built for snorkeling or diving.
Vivo is apparently preparing a follow-up to last year’s Y31 for the Indian market. Early images and specs that have surfaced point to a phone focused on battery life and durability in the affordable segment. A leaked rear render has also appeared, giving the first look at what the device might look like before its official reveal.
According to the leak, the Vivo Y31T will have a 6.75-inch LCD display with HD+ resolution and peak brightness of 1,250 nits. Power comes from Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset paired with UFS 2.2 storage. Memory options are expected to include 4GB/128GB, 6GB/128GB, and 6GB/256GB. The big highlight is a hefty 7,200 mAh battery with 44W fast charging, which should easily handle all-day use and possibly stretch into a second day for lighter users. Colour options listed so far are Crimson Red, Gold Mist, and Seashore Green.
On the camera side, there’s a 50MP main sensor on the back along with a 2MP secondary unit (mostly decorative), while an 8MP camera handles selfies. The phone is said to measure 8.39 mm thick and carries both IP66 and IP68 ratings for dust and water resistance. Compared with the original Y31, the Y31T brings a slightly larger and brighter screen plus a much bigger battery.
It’s apparently being positioned against phones like the Oppo A6 5G, which suggests a price below ₹30,000. That puts it in the value mid-range category in 2026. Official confirmation and the full details, including software, exact launch date, and final pricing, are still pending.
The leaked package paints the Y31T as a practical daily driver that prioritises longevity and durability. More information should emerge as we get closer to the launch.
The Oppo A7 Pro Max has raised the bar for battery-focused smartphones with its massive 10,000mAh battery, 80W charging and Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 chipset. It also packs a 6.78-inch 1.5K 120Hz OLED display and 50-megapixel cameras, making it an interesting option for users who prioritise endurance. However, the phone is currently limited to China, making alternatives more practical for buyers in other markets.
Oppo A7 Pro Max
If you like the idea of a phone that can last for days but want stronger performance, different camera capabilities or a device that is already available in more markets, there are several alternatives worth considering. Here are five options that offer a different take on the A7 Pro Max formula.
The upcoming Oppo F35 Pro could be particularly interesting because it is expected to follow a similar formula to the A7 Pro Max, with reports pointing to a 10,000mAh battery and Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 chipset. The Motorola Edge 70 Fusion is another option to watch, while last year’s Poco F7, Realme GT 7T and Oppo K13 Turbo Pro remain relevant alternatives with batteries of around 7,000mAh alongside significantly more powerful chipsets. These models offer a better balance between battery endurance and performance, making them worth considering for users who want strong gaming and everyday performance without giving up the benefits of a large battery.
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
Krafton India has announced that Battlegrounds Mobile India (BGMI) Lite is officially in the works and slated for release by the end of 2026. It is a quiet confirmation of something the Indian mobile gaming community has been asking for since the original game was rebranded and brought back post-ban. But the real story here isn’t just that a lighter version of a popular battle royale is launching; it is about why it is happening right now.
For a few years, the standard version of BGMI ran perfectly fine on most mid-range and budget Android devices. However, the smartphone hardware market has hit a strange bottleneck recently. Driven by the mobile industry’s current obsession with integrating expensive AI-specific silicon, combined with a massive surge in global memory and RAM pricing, smartphone manufacturers have been forced to cut corners. The result is that the current crop of budget-tier smartphones actually offers worse raw gaming performance than devices released a couple of years ago.
According to us, this hardware regression makes a Lite version a practical necessity rather than just a portfolio expansion. Before the sweeping 2020 ban on apps with Chinese ties, PUBG Mobile Lite was incredibly popular in India, catering specifically to the massive demographic using entry-level hardware. When Krafton successfully navigated regulatory hurdles to relaunch the main game as BGMI, the Lite counterpart was left behind. At the time, it didn’t seem to matter much because budget phones were getting increasingly capable. That is simply no longer the case.
In its announcement, Krafton kept the specifics light, stating only that the game will arrive by the end of 2026 and aims to make the BGMI experience accessible to an even wider community of players. The company has not yet detailed exactly what graphical compromises, map size reductions, or gameplay tweaks will be made to accommodate lower-end hardware, noting that those specifics will be shared closer to the launch date.
Ultimately, launching BGMI Lite is a straightforward retention strategy. As the cost of entry for decent mobile gaming hardware creeps up, Krafton needs a way to keep its massive Indian player base engaged without relying on them to upgrade their phones. It is a pragmatic response to a smartphone market that has temporarily sacrificed budget gaming performance for AI features and component costs.
In related news, Ayaneo has recently launched the Konkr Pocket Advance retro handheld, featuring PS2 emulation in a compact GBA-inspired design.
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
Xiaomi has reportedly pulled the plug on the Xiaomi 18 Ultra, and you might see the word Ultra disappear from a lot more Chinese flagships next year.
Words for this come from tipster Kartikey Singh on X, who claims that Xiaomi has decided to scrap the Ultra model for its next flagship smartphone series.
As a result, instead of the usual four-way lineup with a camera-focused Ultra at the top, we’ll only get the Xiaomi 18, the Xiaomi 18 Pro, and the Xiaomi 18 Pro Max.
Previous reports point to soaring memory chip prices as the main reason. DRAM and NAND costs have climbed sharply in 2026 on the back of AI demand, and squeezing in Ultra-tier hardware like a 200MP quad-camera system would have pushed the price well past what most buyers would pay. The good news, if you can call it that, is that the Ultra isn’t gone forever.
Xiaomi is expected to bring it back with the Xiaomi 19 Ultra sometime in late 2027 or early 2028, once component costs settle down. Until then, the Xiaomi 18 Pro Max is tipped to be the top-of-the-line model from the brand.
On the other hand, Oppo Find X10 Ultra and Vivo X300 will remain exclusive to China
Xiaomi isn’t alone here. Rising memory costs have reportedly made Oppo and Vivo rethink their own next-generation Ultra phones as well. Their current Ultra models, the Oppo Find X9 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra, made it to global markets this year. But according to Singh, their successors, the Oppo Find X10 Ultra and the Vivo X500 Ultra, might stay limited to China when they launch in the first half of 2027.
Neither company has confirmed that yet, so treat it as an early claim.
At last, Xiaomi scrapped the 18 Ultra, OPPO/Vivo decided not to launch next generation Ultra's in Global markets. Samsungs Ultra might be the only one available globally. All others will jump to Pro Max.
The shower of Pro Max smartphones is coming soon. However, these Pro Max…
If that does happen, Samsung’s Galaxy S27 Ultra would be left as the only true Ultra-branded flagship you can actually buy outside China. Everyone else will compete with their Pro Max model in the flagship segment.
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
Losing your keys used to mean checking every couch cushion, drawer, and jacket pocket in the house. Now, you can clip a small tracker to your keys, bag, or wallet and use your phone to find it.
Apple popularized this category with the AirTag, and we have since seen several makers — smartphone and not — launching their own tracking devices. That market now has a new big name. At the Made by Google event alongside the Pixel 11 series, Google launched its first item tracker, the Pixel Tag. It will go on sale on November 11.
Apple has had the AirTag since 2021 and updated it earlier this year, while Samsung has offered the Galaxy SmartTag2 since 2023. All three do the same basic job, but they work very differently depending on which phone you use.
Here’s a comparison of the Google Pixel Tag, Apple AirTag, and Samsung Galaxy SmartTag2 to help you decide which one makes the most sense for you.
The three trackers are priced almost the same. The Pixel Tag costs $29 for one or $99 for a four-pack, matching the AirTag. The Galaxy SmartTag2 costs $30 for one or $100 for four.
Visually, they look different. AirTag is a small, flat, round disc, closer to the size of a large coin. The Galaxy SmartTag2 is pill-shaped with a large metal ring loop built into one end, so it clips onto keychains without needing a case. The Pixel Tag also uses a pill-shaped, pebble-like body, measuring about 46 x 28 x 5.4mm and weighing under 12 grams, but it has no built-in loop, so you’ll likely need a case or holder to attach it to keys. For now, it comes in just one color called Fog, which is a light gray.
All three use a replaceable CR2032 coin battery, so users can replace the battery when it runs out instead of buying a new tracker.
Google and Apple say their trackers can last more than a year on a single battery with normal use. Samsung claims up to 500 days of battery life in normal mode, or up to 700 days with power-saving mode enabled.
They are also similarly durable. All three have an IP67 rating, meaning they are protected from dust and can survive being submerged in up to about a meter of water for a short time. So a little rain or a wet backpack shouldn’t be a problem.
2. How they find your stuff
Each tracker has its own strength and/or weakness in how they work. All three use two main ways to find your belongings. They can connect directly to your phone when you’re nearby, or use a larger network of other phones to find the tracker when it’s far away.
AirTag
The latest AirTag uses Ultra Wideband (UWB) to help you find a lost item when you’re nearby. Your iPhone can show you which direction to walk and how far away the tracker is. Speaking of which, the Precision Finding on the new AirTag covers 50% more range than the previous generation, thanks to Apple’s second-generation UWB chip.
Apple also made the new AirTag’s speaker louder by 50%, which the company claims can be heard from up to twice as far away. And when you’re too far away for a direct connection, AirTag uses Apple’s Find My network, so that other nearby Apple devices can detect the lost AirTag and anonymously send its location to its owner.
Pixel Tag
The Pixel Tag works similarly, but uses Google’s Android ecosystem. It uses both UWB and Bluetooth Channel Sounding for precision finding, but the exact features you get depend on your phone’s hardware and software.
UWB uses a dedicated ultra-wideband chip to provide more precise distance and directional information, while Bluetooth Channel Sounding uses newer Bluetooth technology to measure distance without requiring UWB hardware. However, Channel Sounding requires a compatible phone running Android 16 or newer with Bluetooth 6.0 or later, while UWB also requires a phone with a UWB chip.
When the tracker is out of direct range, it switches to Google’s Find Hub network, which relies on participating Android devices to detect lost items. Android smartphone pool is much bigger compared to Apple, and such a large network could be a major advantage in crowded places like airports, shopping centers, and city streets. The more Android devices nearby, the better the chance that one of them will detect your lost tracker.
Galaxy SmartTag2
Samsung Galaxy SmartTag 2
Samsung’s Galaxy SmartTag2 also combines Bluetooth and UWB. Samsung claims a Bluetooth range of up to 120 meters under ideal conditions. However, the most accurate UWB tracking only works if your Galaxy phone has a UWB chip. Not every Samsung phone has one, so some cheaper Galaxy A-series phones and certain other models won’t offer the full tracking experience.
For finding lost items from a distance, the SmartTag2 uses Samsung’s SmartThings Find network. Unlike Google’s network, this is limited to Samsung Galaxy devices.
3. The ecosystem problem
This is probably the most important thing to consider before buying any of these trackers. The three trackers don’t work together, and two of them are heavily tied to their own phone brands.
The Galaxy SmartTag2 is the most restrictive. It works with Samsung Galaxy phones and tablets through the SmartThings Find app. If you use a Pixel, OnePlus, or iPhone, you can’t use it as your everyday tracker.
AirTag has a similar limitation on the Apple side. You need an iPhone or iPad for setup and regular tracking. Android phones can scan a lost AirTag using NFC and see the owner’s contact information if Lost Mode is enabled, but Android users don’t get the full tracking experience.
The Pixel Tag is more flexible and works with Android phones running Android 9 or later, although some advanced finding features require newer hardware and software. This gives Google a much wider reach than Samsung. However, it still doesn’t work as a full-featured tracker with iPhones.
So the real choice is fairly simple. AirTag for Apple users, Pixel Tag for most Android users, and SmartTag2 for Samsung Galaxy users.
4. Which one should you buy?
If you use an iPhone, the AirTag is still the obvious choice. Apple’s Find My network is large and well established, while the new UWB chip and louder speaker make it easier to locate the tag when you’re nearby.
If you use a Samsung Galaxy phone, the Galaxy SmartTag2 is a good option. It has excellent battery life and works well within Samsung’s ecosystem. Just remember that the best tracking features depend on your specific Galaxy phone.
For other Android users, the Pixel Tag makes the most sense. It works across a much wider range of Android phones, costs about the same as an AirTag, has an IP67 rating, and uses Google’s Find Hub network, which the company says covers more than a billion devices. However, note that Pixel Tag doesn’t go on sale until November 11, so you will have to wait if you’re willing to get one.
If you want something thinner or designed specifically for wallets, third-party trackers such as the Ugreen FineTrack Slim Duo 2 are also worth considering. But for a simple first-party option, the Pixel Tag fills a gap Android users have had since the AirTag launched in 2021.
Citizen has updated its Rolan watch collection in the United Kingdom with a new color configuration. The new model, officially listed as the AW2113-16X, pairs a brown metal dial with a rose gold-tone stainless steel case and a standard brown leather strap. It is available now directly through Citizen’s UK website for £199.00.
The AW2113-16X joins an established lineup of Rolan variants, expanding a catalog that already includes dial options in blue, mother-of-pearl, salmon, and black. From a hardware perspective, this new release does not alter the physical dimensions of the series.
The case measures 41mm in diameter, placing it in the standard middle ground of modern watch sizing. It features a basic three-hand dial layout, which is protected by a mineral crystal.
The tech driving the watch remains Citizen’s proprietary Eco-Drive movement. Instead of using a traditional replaceable silver-oxide battery, the Eco-Drive system utilizes a specialized solar panel situated beneath the dial to draw power from both natural and artificial light sources.
This energy is stored in an internal rechargeable cell. For the end user, this means the watch can run continuously without requiring routine battery swaps, provided it receives regular exposure to light.
In terms of durability, the official technical specifications list the watch with a water resistance rating of 50 meters, or 5 Bar. This rating means the hardware is sealed well enough to handle surface swimming, rain, and general water exposure, though it is not rated for high-pressure water activities or diving.
When you hear the term Android laptop, it is easy to picture a tablet with a keyboard case attached to it. For a long time, that is exactly what the budget Android computing space offered. You usually had to choose between a low-cost Windows machine that might struggle with basic updates or a Chromebook that relies heavily on an internet connection.
Recently, Primebook sent me their new Primebook 2 Max (2026) to test. Priced at Rs. 27,990, it takes a different approach. Instead of trying to run Windows on entry-level hardware, it uses PrimeOS 3.0, an operating system based on Android 15 but designed to look and function like a traditional desktop. It comes with an integrated AI tool, a 15.6-inch screen, and a MediaTek Helio G99 processor.
I went into this review with moderate expectations. I have used the Helio G99 in budget tablets, where it performs adequately, but a laptop environment is usually more demanding. After using the Primebook 2 Max as my primary computer for the past two weeks, I am really surprised and found it to be a capable machine. It has clear limitations, but it also offers a practical alternative for people who primarily need a device for basic tasks and long battery life. Here is a detailed look at how it holds up in daily use.
The Primebook looks just like any other laptop. It weighs 1.61 kg and is 20mm thick, making it relatively easy to carry around in a backpack. The chassis is made entirely of plastic. It feels reasonably sturdy for the price, without too much creaking when you rest your wrists on it.
The model I tested comes in a matte Chill Grey finish. It looks clean out of the box, but the review unit I received had a bit of a scratch near the logo. I am not so sure about how scratch-proof it is since I use my devices very carefully, but I hope the paint stays like this for a long time.
Now, coming to another part which you might not expect in this price range is the hinge. The laptop can actually open a full 180 degrees, so it can lie completely flat.
However, you can’t open the lid one-handed, as the base lifts off the table when you try, but the small notch at the top makes it easy to open with both hands. That notch also houses a 1440p webcam. The camera quality is good enough for video calls, and it includes a physical privacy shutter, which is a practical addition.
Display
The laptop features a 15.6-inch Full HD (1920 x 1080) IPS LCD screen with a standard 16:9 aspect ratio. For a laptop that costs under Rs. 30,000, the display is decent. It has a matte, anti-glare finish, which I prefer for working because it cuts down on reflections from overhead lights.
The colors (covering 45% of the NTSC color space) are fine for everyday tasks like reading, writing, and watching casual videos. The viewing angles are also good; the screen remains readable even if you look at it from the side. However, if you are watching dark scenes in a movie, you might notice some color banding, which is typical in this price range.
The main limitation is the brightness. The panel maxes out at 250 nits. This is perfectly adequate for indoor use, but if you try to work outside, you will likely struggle to see the screen clearly.
There is a Super Brightness setting in the software that helps slightly, but it is still primarily an indoor display.
Keyboard and Trackpad
The keyboard on the Primebook 2 Max is an absolute delight. It’s a full-sized chiclet keyboard complete with a number pad, which is a massive win for students dealing with spreadsheets. It’s also backlit, a feature that is criminally omitted from many budget laptops.
Because this is an Android-first machine, the function row is populated with a different set of shortcut keys tailored specifically to the OS. I found these incredibly useful for daily tasks, allowing me to quickly manage my system without diving into menus.
The key travel is comfortable, and the typing experience is silent, perfect for quieter environments like libraries or late-night dorm rooms. If you’re coming from a standard Windows keyboard, it might take a day or two to adjust your muscle memory, but once you do, it’s smooth sailing.
The trackpad, however, is a slightly different story. Physically, it’s great. It’s a large, expansive surface area, and my fingers hovered and swiped across it without any physical friction. But in practice, the mouse pointer feels just a bit sluggish. It’s not exactly where I want it to be at the exact right time.
I often found myself having to wait a fraction of a second to click on something because my fingers had already completed the swipe, but the on-screen pointer was playing catch-up. It’s not a total dealbreaker, but it is noticeable. I’m hoping this is just a software quirk that Primebook can patch in a future update, rather than a hardware polling limitation.
The Primebook 2 Max includes a standard set of ports. On the right side, there is a 3.5mm audio jack, a USB-C port (which supports data and OTG), a USB Type-A 2.0 port, and a microSD card slot that can read cards up to 1TB. On the left side, you will find a dedicated USB Type-C port used specifically for charging, along with two more USB Type-A ports.
For wireless connections, it supports dual-band Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 5.1. I had no issues maintaining a stable internet connection or pairing wireless headphones. Because it runs on Android hardware, the laptop also includes a built-in GPS and a gyroscope, which allows certain mobile apps to function as they would on a phone.
There are a couple of omissions to note. The USB-C ports do not support DisplayPort output, meaning you cannot easily connect the laptop to an external monitor using a standard Type-C cable. Also, it lacks a native wireless file-sharing feature like Quick Share.
Performance and Benchmarks
Inside, the laptop runs on a MediaTek Helio G99 processor, paired with 8GB of LPDDR4X RAM and 256GB of UFS 2.2 storage. This is hardware you typically find in mid-range Android tablets.
In practice, the performance is suitable for basic computing. It boots up quickly, and navigating the desktop interface is generally smooth. I was able to use a web browser with several tabs open, type up documents, and listen to music at the same time without much issue.
However, you will notice the hardware limits if you try to push it. If you open more than ten heavy browser tabs or try to run multiple demanding Android apps in the background, the system starts to slow down. The animations become less fluid, and switching between apps takes longer.
The benchmark numbers reflect this experience. In Geekbench 6, it scored 696 in single-core and 1,682 in multi-core. In AnTuTu, it reached a total score of 576,220. Storage speeds are reasonable for the price, with sequential read speeds around 732 MB/s and write speeds around 405 MB/s, which helps apps load relatively quickly.
Graphics performance is where the hardware struggles the most. In the 3DMark Wild Life Extreme test, it scored just 337, averaging about 2 frames per second. This means the laptop is not meant for heavy 3D gaming.
You can play standard Android games like BGMI, Call of Duty, or Subway Surfers, but you will need to keep the graphics settings on low or medium for a smooth experience. The built-in keymapping software is quite helpful here, allowing you to assign keyboard keys to on-screen touch controls.
Software and AI
The software is the most interesting part of this laptop. It runs PrimeOS 3.0, which is based on Android 15 but modified to look and act like a desktop operating system. You get a taskbar, a start menu, and a task manager. You can open apps in resizable windows, snap them to the sides of the screen, and use familiar keyboard shortcuts like Alt+Tab.
Because it is a custom OS, it does not come with the Google Play Store. Instead, you download apps from the Primestore. The store has a good selection of common apps, and there is an option to request apps that are missing.
If you occasionally need to use full Windows or Linux applications, Primebook offers a feature called PrimeX, which is a Cloud PC service. By paying a subscription fee (starting at Rs. 499 per month), you can stream a virtual desktop to the laptop. I tried this on a stable Wi-Fi connection, and it worked well enough for running desktop software.
The OS also includes an AI feature called PrimeAGNT. It is powered by models like Gemini and Qwen and can perform tasks like reading your screen, summarizing text, or changing system settings. It operates on a credit system; the laptop comes with a set amount of free credits, and once you run out, you have to purchase more. It is a neat addition for basic automation, though it feels like a feature that is still evolving.
One notable software limitation is media streaming. The laptop only has Widevine L3 certification. This means that if you watch Netflix or Amazon Prime Video, the stream will be capped at standard definition (480p or 540p). It can play local 1080p video files perfectly fine, but the lack of high-definition streaming for major platforms is a drawback if you watch a lot of movies online.
Sound and Battery Life
The audio comes from dual stereo speakers located on the bottom, with secondary grilles near the keyboard. They get quite loud and are fine for watching YouTube videos or attending online meetings in a quiet room. However, they lack bass, and if you turn the volume up past 80%, the sound begins to distort.
Battery life is easily the laptop’s strongest feature. It has a 60.3Wh battery, and because the mobile processor is quite power-efficient, it lasts a long time. In my daily use, which consisted of web browsing, writing, and watching some videos, I consistently got around 10 to 12 hours of screen-on time. If you use it lightly, you can easily go a couple of days without plugging it in.
Charging, on the other hand, is less convenient. The laptop comes with a proprietary 36W charger, and it takes about two and a half hours to charge from zero to full. It does not support USB Power Delivery (PD) charging, which means you cannot use a standard high-speed Type-C phone or laptop charger to power it up. You have to carry the specific Primebook charger with you.
Verdict
The Primebook 2 Max (2026) is a practical machine that knows its target audience. By combining an Android-based operating system with a traditional laptop form factor, it offers a functional environment for people whose daily tasks revolve around web browsing, document editing, and mobile apps.
It gets the basics right: the screen is comfortable to look at, the keyboard is suitable for typing, and the battery life is excellent. The desktop-style interface of PrimeOS 3.0 makes navigating Android apps much easier than on a standard tablet.
It is not a laptop for power users. However, at Rs. 27,990, it provides a viable option for students or casual users who want a device with a long-lasting battery for basic daily work. If your computing needs are light and you want to avoid the sluggishness of entry-level Windows laptops, the Primebook 2 Max is worth considering.
Minisforum has released the Elite Mini M2 Air-304, a new compact desktop PC that focuses on quiet operation and networking capabilities. It is currently available for preorder starting at $263 for the barebones model, with shipping expected in early September.
The M2 Air-304 is built around the Intel Core 3 304, a processor from Intel‘s Wildcat Lake lineup. It features five cores and five threads, with a maximum turbo frequency of 4.3GHz. This isn’t a machine built for heavy gaming or intensive video editing. Instead, Minisforum is positioning it as a practical option for standard office work, retail point-of-sale systems, and home media setups.
Inside the 0.47-liter case, which measures 112 x 112 x 37.15mm, there is room for up to 64GB of DDR5 memory. While the motherboard supports memory speeds up to 6400 MT/s, the pre-configured models will ship with 5600 MT/s RAM. For storage, the system includes a single M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 NVMe slot, along with a TF card slot for additional storage expansion.
The M2 Air-304 includes two 2.5GbE LAN ports with Intel I226-V controllers, making it suitable for soft routers, network segmentation, and lightweight network nodes. It also supports Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.4.
For connectivity, the front of the device has two USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 ports and a 3.5mm audio jack. The back panel includes a USB4 port that supports 40Gbps data transfer and power delivery, a 10Gbps USB-C port, one standard USB 2.0 port, and two HDMI 2.0 outputs. By using the HDMI and USB4 ports together, the computer can output to three 4K displays simultaneously at 60Hz.
The PC uses a standard blower fan and phase-change material for cooling. In its 15W Silent Mode, the company says it produces about 28.1dB of noise under full load. In the 28W Balanced Mode, that goes up to 32.7dB, keeping CPU temperatures between 72 and 80 degrees Celsius.
The barebones M2 Air-304 is currently discounted to $263 (down from its regular $329 price tag), while a fully configured model with 16GB of RAM and a 500GB SSD is priced at $559.
In related news, Acemagic has recently unveiled the F9A Mini PC with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, up to 128GB RAM, and Oculink eGPU support.
Rising component costs are quietly reshaping the cheap end of the American smartphone market in ways most people didn’t see coming a year ago. The ultra-affordable segment is thinning out fast, leaving fewer choices for buyers on a tight budget.
According to Counterpoint Research, sales of phones under $100 in the US dropped 64% year-over-year in the second quarter of 2026. That put volume in the segment at roughly one-third of what it was a year earlier. The main culprit? Skyrocketing memory chip prices.
Manufacturers have been forced to either raise retail prices or just stop shipping the cheapest models. Memory and storage now eat up a much bigger chunk of the bill of materials on budget phones, so the old rock-bottom price points are getting harder to hit.
Overall US smartphone sales fell 5% in the quarter. The top four brands, Apple, Samsung, Motorola, and Google, only dropped about 4% combined. Everyone else? Their sales plunged 45%. Smaller and niche players that depended on thin margins from low-cost devices are feeling the heat the most. Some, like HMD, had already pulled back or left the US market last year because of weakness in the prepaid channel and tariff uncertainty. Higher memory and storage costs have only made things tougher.
Prepaid smartphone sales themselves were down 11% year-over-year. But inside that shrinking channel, Samsung and Motorola actually gained ground. Samsung’s share of the US prepaid market jumped nine percentage points to 47%, while Motorola picked up four points to hit 32%. Carriers are leaning harder on Samsung’s Galaxy A series and Motorola’s Moto G lineup to keep customers as the cheaper alternatives disappear. With fewer options left, the prepaid space has pretty much narrowed down to these two brands.
The end result: the cheapest phones are becoming harder to find and more expensive. As long as memory costs stay high, that pressure on the budget tier isn’t going away anytime soon.
1MORE has released the AiClip S52, a new pair of open-ear wireless earbuds that integrate AI productivity software. The earphones are currently available in China for a standard price of 698 yuan ($103), with a launch discount bringing them down to 628.2 yuan ($93).
The S52 uses a clip-on form factor that leaves the ear canal open. The earbuds attach using a 0.5mm titanium alloy C-shaped bridge and a four-point support system designed to keep them stable during movement.
To address the sound leakage that typically affects open-ear designs, 1MORE included directional audio transmission technology, which the company says limits leakage to between 10 and 15 decibels. The earbuds are rated IPX5 for water resistance, meaning they can handle sweat and light moisture.
Internally, the earbuds use 11mm composite-diaphragm dynamic drivers. They support standard SBC and AAC codecs, as well as LDAC for higher-resolution audio, and include spatial audio processing.
For connectivity, the S52 adopts the Bluetooth 6.0 standard. This allows for a 10-meter connection range and dual-device multipoint pairing, letting users stay connected to two devices simultaneously with automatic switching.
The earbuds focus on AI-powered software integration through the 1MORE companion app, connecting to models like DeepSeek, Tencent Hunyuan, and Doubao for meeting transcription, summaries, and mind-map generation.
The software also includes a translation tool for face-to-face conversations, supporting simultaneous interpretation across 17 languages. To capture audio for these features and standard phone calls, the earbuds use a four-microphone array with wind-noise reduction.
Battery life is listed at up to 10 hours of playback per charge from the 40mAh batteries in each earbud. The 400mAh USB-C charging case extends the total usage time to 45 hours. Playback, calls, and the voice assistant are managed through standard touch controls on the earbuds, which can be customized in the app.
In related news, QCY has launched the affordable T13 Pro earbuds with 50dB ANC, 13mm drivers, and up to 49 hours of battery life. Edifier has also introduced new wired gaming earbuds featuring Hi-Res Audio and hybrid triple drivers.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
