Oppo Find X7, Find X7 Ultra launch date, configurations, color options officially confirmed

-

Sep 12, 2026

Casio has added a new line of analog watches to its global catalog. The MTP-E735AR series, which appeared on the company’s international website earlier this month, is a set of five quartz watches featuring integrated stainless steel bracelets and patterned dials. The watches are expected to launch in various markets, though Casio has not yet shared official pricing or exact availability details.

Casio MTP-E735AR watches — Edited (MTP-E735AR-2A2V)

Design Details

The design of the MTP-E735AR incorporates an integrated bracelet, a style where the watch case transitions directly into the metal band. The case is made of stainless steel with a brushed silver-tone finish. It measures 44.5mm lug-to-lug, 37.5mm across, and 8.4mm thick, resulting in a relatively compact and thin profile for everyday wear. The total weight of the watch with the stainless steel band is 89 grams.

For the dial, Casio is using an arabesque-style motif rather than a standard flat or sunburst finish. The swirling pattern covers the entire face and is paired with stylized hour markers. The series includes five color variants: black (MTP-E735AR-1AV), deep blue (2A1V), pale ice blue (2A2V), turquoise blue (2A3V), and white (7AV).

Four of the models use silver-tone hands and indices that match the case hardware. The white-dial variant uses blue hands and markers to maintain legibility against the lighter background.

Internally, the watches rely on a standard Casio quartz movement. They run on an SR920SW battery, which the company states will last for approximately three years before needing a replacement. The movement has an accuracy rating of ±20 seconds per month and includes a traditional three-hand timekeeping setup.

For daily utility, there is a day and date window positioned at the 3 o’clock mark. The day display is bilingual and can be toggled between English and Arabic. The dial is covered by standard mineral glass, and the case has a water resistance rating of 50 meters (5 bar). This rating means the watch can handle brief water exposure or surface swimming, though it is not intended for diving.

While pricing remains unconfirmed, the use of mineral glass and a basic quartz movement indicates that the MTP-E735AR series will likely be positioned as an entry-level option when it reaches retailers later this fall.

In related news, Casio has recently launched three premium G-Steel GST-W1000 watches with a slimmer steel design, alongside two new 90s-inspired Baby-G BG-169 watches in the US.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Casio 1,2,3,4,5)

Citizen brings its GPS-syncing premium Attesa CC4084-83Z watch to the US

By

-

Sep 12, 2026

Citizen has updated its US storefront to include the Attesa CC4084-83Z, bringing the titanium watch to the US market. The company initially launched the watch in the UK earlier this week alongside the CC4085-81Z. While the CC4084-83Z was missing from the initial US rollout, it is now available to purchase directly from the manufacturer for $2,295.

Design Details

The Attesa line focuses on autonomous timekeeping and power management. The CC4084-83Z operates on Citizen’s F950 caliber movement, which integrates the company’s Eco-Drive technology. This system charges the watch’s internal battery using ambient light, including standard indoor office lighting and natural sunlight, which eliminates the need for manual charging or physical battery replacements.

For time synchronization, the watch relies on Satellite Wave GPS. Rather than connecting to a smartphone via Bluetooth or receiving local radio tower signals, the watch communicates directly with GPS satellites. This allows the device to detect its location and automatically adjust to the correct local time zone anywhere in the world. The F950 movement also powers a perpetual calendar, dual time zone tracking, and standard chronograph features.

The watch features a 44.6mm case. To offset the weight typical of larger watches, Citizen uses titanium for both the case and the matching link bracelet. The metal is finished in a dark gunmetal color and treated with a Diamond-Like Carbon (DLC) coating to improve everyday scratch resistance.

Visually, the dark gunmetal hardware is paired with a green world-time bezel and a green-and-black dial. The layout includes gold-tone accents, prominent hour markers, and three sub-dials, resulting in a technical, aviation-inspired design.

The watch features an anti-reflective sapphire crystal and offers water resistance up to 100 meters, making it suitable for swimming and showering. Citizen is limiting global production of the CC4084-83Z to 1,500 unnumbered pieces.

In related news, Citizen has recently launched a rugged Eco-Drive field watch with a military-inspired design.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Citizen)

iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone Duo supports 60W charging; but your 96W MacBook charger is incompatible

By

Check iPhone 18 Pro Price on Amazon

-

Sep 12, 2026

Apple has taken a fair amount of flak over the years for how slowly its iPhones charge compared with a lot of Android phones that happily hit 100W or more. The new iPhone 18 Pro and 18 Pro Max finally speed things up a bit, but there’s a familiar catch if you want the full benefit.

Apple says the 18 Pro series can hit 50% in about 15 minutes. That’s roughly a quarter faster than the iPhone 17 Pro, which needed around 20 minutes for the same top-up. A quick five-minute charge is also claimed to give you about six hours of video playback. The improvement comes from higher peak power delivery.

Also ReadiPhone Duo vs iPhone 18 Pro Max: $2,000 Foldable or Smarter Buy?

Here’s the catch: you need a charger that supports peak 60W, USB Power Delivery 3.1, and Adjustable Voltage Supply (AVS). Apple’s own 40W Dynamic Power Adapter (which can output up to 60W) plus a compatible USB-C cable will get you those advertised speeds. Higher-wattage MacBook chargers, the 96W or 140W ones, don’t qualify because they lack the adjustable voltage feature. Plenty of popular third-party options over 40W, like some Anker 45W adapters, will still charge the phone, but they usually max out at the previous generation’s roughly 20-minute mark for 50%.

As usual, there’s no power adapter in the box, just a USB-C cable, so if you want the fastest wired speeds you’ll need to buy the Dynamic Power Adapter separately. Wireless charging gets a boost too: with a MagSafe charger and any 35W (or higher) adapter, you can reach 50% in about 30 minutes.

🔌 You’ll NeedThere’s no charger in the box, and only Apple’s 60W-capable adapter unlocks the fastest wired speeds. Check Apple 40W Dynamic Power Adapter price on Amazon →

The upcoming foldable iPhone Duo, expected next month, supports the same faster speeds under the exact same conditions, so again you’ll need the right adapter for peak performance. It’s a welcome improvement, but the fact that the brand’s own higher-wattage MacBook chargers are not fully compatible with the 18 Pro series continues that long-running pattern of gating the top experience behind official accessories.

The good news is that Adjustable Voltage Supply isn’t some Apple-only proprietary standard. It’s an open protocol defined by the USB-IF, so any charger or power bank that properly supports PD 3.1 or newer should be able to deliver the peak power.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Creative launches B3 gaming soundbar with 20W peak power, Bluetooth 6.0 & RGB lighting

By

Shop Creative soundbars on Amazon

-

Sep 12, 2026

Creative has launched a new desktop soundbar in China, the Creative B3, which is currently listed on JD.com. The soundbar has a standard retail price of 429 yuan ($64), with an initial launch price set at 339 yuan ($50).

Creative B3 Soundbar Specifications

Inside the 420mm-wide unit, the B3 features a four-driver acoustic system. It uses a symmetrical two-way design, pairing two 58mm bass drivers with two 40mm high-frequency drivers. This configuration separates the low and high frequencies to maintain audio clarity during media playback and gaming.

The system is managed by an Actions Semiconductor audio chipset with a 32-bit processing core and a DSP programmed for gaming audio. It has a frequency response range of 20Hz to 20kHz and delivers a peak output of 20W. The power output is divided into 4W for the left and right channels, and 6W for each of the two subwoofer channels.

The soundbar supports Bluetooth 6.0, utilizing a wireless transmission chip designed to reduce audio latency and keep game audio synchronized with on-screen visuals. Alongside the wireless option, the rear panel includes ports for USB-C, optical, and 3.5mm AUX connections.

This allows the B3 to connect to PCs, macOS devices, smartphones, and TVs. It is also compatible with the PlayStation 5 and Nintendo Switch, though it requires users to switch the soundbar to a dedicated console mode for those systems.

Also ReadThe Best Soundbars of 2026

For voice communication, Creative included a built-in omnidirectional microphone with noise-reduction capabilities to filter out background noise during multiplayer sessions.

On the front panel, a spherical control unit combines a rotary dial and touch controls. This hub manages power, volume, media playback, and the circular RGB lighting, which can be disabled entirely via a dedicated button. The control dial also allows users to switch between four EQ presets. The B3 measures 420 x 87 x 87.4mm and weighs 1.28kg, fitting under most standard monitors.

Also ReadBest Bluetooth speakers in 2026

In related news, check out our roundup of the best soundbars of 2026.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(JD)

Xiaomi launches Redmi A27U 2027 monitor with 4K 120Hz, 90W USB-C & dedicated Apple color mode

By

Shop Redmi monitors on Amazon

-

Sep 12, 2026

Xiaomi is currently taking pre-orders in China for a new desktop monitor, the Redmi Monitor A27U Type-C 120Hz 2027. It costs 1,699 yuan (about $253), making it a relatively affordable option for people who want one screen that can handle both daily work and gaming.

Redmi Monitor A27U 2027 Specifications

The monitor uses a 27-inch 4K IPS panel with slim bezels on three sides. It has a standard 1500:1 contrast ratio and a typical brightness of 400 nits, which meets the basic DisplayHDR 400 certification.

Instead of sticking to a single refresh rate, it offers a dual-mode setup. For regular desktop use and content creation, it runs at its native 4K resolution at 120Hz. If you want to play games and prefer higher frame rates over resolution, you can switch it to a 1080p mode that runs at 240Hz.

For color, the screen covers 100% of the sRGB gamut and 98% of DCI-P3. Xiaomi says each monitor is calibrated at the factory to ensure an average Delta E of less than 1. If you use a Mac, there is a specific M Mode designed to match Apple‘s Display P3 color output. This should help keep colors looking consistent when you plug in a MacBook or iPad.

To reduce glare from windows or office lights, the screen has an anti-reflective coating that Xiaomi says brings overall reflectance down to 2.6 percent. It also includes standard eye-care features, like DC dimming to prevent screen flickering and a hardware-level blue light filter certified by TÜV Rheinland.

Also ReadBest Budget Gaming Monitors Under $200 (2026)

You can connect a laptop to the monitor using a single USB-C cable, which handles video and data while providing up to 90W of power to keep your computer charged. The back of the monitor also includes two HDMI 2.1 ports, one DisplayPort 1.4, two USB 2.0 ports for basic accessories, and a standard headphone jack.

The included stand lets you adjust the height, tilt, and swivel, and you can rotate the screen vertically into portrait mode. The monitor is available for pre-order in China now and comes with a three-year warranty.

In related news, AOC has recently launched a new 49-inch ultrawide curved gaming monitor with a 240Hz QD-OLED panel and 90W USB-C charging. BenQ has also introduced a new 27-inch gaming monitor featuring a 1440p QD-OLED panel with a 240Hz refresh rate.

Also ReadBest budget gaming monitors (August 2026)

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(JD)

Google Pixel 11 Pro vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Which Phone Gives You More Value?

By

-

Sep 12, 2026

Google Pixel 11 Pro and OPPO Find X9 Pro take very different approaches to the premium Android phone. The Pixel focuses on computational photography, clean software, long-term updates, and Google’s custom Tensor platform, while OPPO pushes hardware with a huge battery, faster charging, and an unusually capable 200MP telephoto camera.

This comparison matters because both phones sit around the same flagship price range, yet prioritize different strengths. The Pixel 11 Pro looks more appealing for software longevity and photography, while the Find X9 Pro is built for buyers who want maximum hardware value. The better choice ultimately depends on whether refinement or raw hardware flexibility matters more.

Major Features:

Category	Google Pixel 11 Pro	OPPO Find X9 Pro	Winner
Design & Build	Glass front/back, aluminum frame, IP68	Glass front/back, aluminum frame, IP68/IP69	OPPO — stronger water resistance
Display	6.3-inch LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3600 nits peak	6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 3600 nits peak	OPPO — larger display and broader HDR support
Performance	Tensor G6, 12GB/16GB RAM	Dimensity 9500, 12GB/16GB RAM	OPPO — more powerful hardware configuration
Storage	Up to 1TB, UFS 4.x	Up to 1TB, UFS 4.1	OPPO — UFS 4.1 storage
Main Camera	50MP, f/1.7, OIS	50MP, f/1.5, OIS	OPPO — wider f/1.5 aperture
Telephoto	48MP, 5x optical zoom	200MP, 3x optical zoom	OPPO — higher-resolution telephoto
Ultrawide	48MP, 123°	50MP, 120°	OPPO — higher resolution
Selfie Camera	42MP ultrawide, PDAF	50MP, PDAF	OPPO — higher resolution
Video	Up to 8K at 30fps	Up to 4K at 120fps, Dolby Vision, LOG	Google — 8K recording
Battery	4,850mAh	7,500mAh	OPPO — much larger battery
Wired Charging	30W	80W	OPPO — much faster charging
Wireless Charging	25W magnetic, Qi2.2	50W	OPPO — higher wireless charging speed
Software Support	Android 17, up to 7 major OS updates	Android 16, up to 5 major OS updates	Google — longer software support
Unique Features	UWB, Satellite SOS, bypass charging, Qi2.2	IR port, IP69, reverse wireless charging	Google — more distinctive ecosystem features
Price	Priced around $1,100 / ₹120,000	Priced around $1,000 / ₹100,000	OPPO — lower price
Overall	Better software longevity and 5x zoom	Better battery, charging and hardware value	OPPO — better overall value

Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.

Check OPPO Find X9 Pro Price on Amazon

1. Design and Display

Build and Feel

Both phones use premium glass construction with aluminum frames and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection on the front. They also offer IP68 water and dust resistance, while the Find X9 Pro adds IP69 protection for greater resistance to high-pressure water jets. Both feature ultrasonic in-display fingerprint sensors and stereo speakers. The OPPO feels more feature-packed from a durability perspective, although the Pixel’s design remains more understated and cohesive.

Also ReadOPPO Find X9s Pro vs Pixel 10 Pro: Which One Is Actually Worth It?

The Pixel 11 Pro also offers UWB, which expands its potential for device tracking and ecosystem features. OPPO counters with an infrared port, making the Find X9 Pro more useful as a universal remote. Neither phone has a headphone jack. For everyday flagship use, both are well equipped, but OPPO delivers a slightly broader hardware feature set.

Display Quality

The Pixel 11 Pro has a 6.3-inch LTPO OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and up to 3,600 nits peak brightness. Its higher pixel density should produce exceptionally crisp text and images, while adaptive refresh rates help balance smoothness and efficiency. It is particularly well suited to users who prefer a compact flagship screen.

The Find X9 Pro counters with a larger 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display supporting Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 1 billion colors, and 3,600 nits peak brightness. Its 2,160Hz PWM dimming can also be easier on sensitive eyes. For movies and gaming, OPPO’s larger canvas feels more immersive, while Pixel wins for compact usability.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro wins the display section for its larger panel, Dolby Vision, richer format support, and high-frequency PWM dimming. Pixel remains preferable for buyers who value a smaller flagship screen.

2. Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 Pro uses Google’s Tensor G6, built on a 3nm process, paired with up to 16GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. Its seven-core design is optimized around Google’s software and AI workloads rather than headline specifications alone. The phone should therefore feel particularly well integrated for everyday tasks, photography processing, and Pixel-exclusive AI features.

The Find X9 Pro uses the 3nm Dimensity 9500 with an octa-core CPU, Arm G1-Ultra graphics, up to 16GB RAM, and faster UFS 4.1 storage. On paper, its configuration is more performance-oriented and better suited to demanding gaming and sustained workloads. OPPO has the stronger hardware proposition here, especially for users who prioritize raw performance.

Battery and Charging

Battery capacity is one of the biggest differences. The Pixel 11 Pro packs a 4,850mAh battery with 30W wired charging and 25W magnetic wireless charging. It also supports reverse wired charging and bypass charging. Google’s software optimization should help, but the charging hardware is conservative for a modern flagship.

OPPO dramatically raises the bar with a 7,500mAh silicon-carbon battery, 80W wired charging, and 50W wireless charging. It also supports 10W reverse wireless charging. The difference is substantial in practical terms, giving the Find X9 Pro much greater endurance potential and faster top-ups. OPPO clearly feels more practical for heavy users.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro wins comfortably, combining a much larger battery with 80W wired and 50W wireless charging. Pixel’s charging features are useful, but OPPO offers substantially better hardware value.

3. Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Pixel 11 Pro combines a 50MP main camera, 48MP 5x periscope telephoto, and 48MP ultrawide. Google adds features such as Best Take, Zoom Enhance, Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR, and multi-zone laser autofocus. The long 5x optical zoom is particularly useful for distant subjects and complements Pixel’s computational photography approach.

The Find X9 Pro uses a 50MP f/1.5 main camera, 200MP 3x periscope telephoto, and 50MP ultrawide. Its large telephoto sensor and high resolution give it considerable cropping flexibility, while Hasselblad color calibration and LOG video target enthusiasts. OPPO has the more ambitious camera hardware, but Pixel’s processing could produce more consistently polished results.

Selfie Camera

Google equips the Pixel 11 Pro with a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera featuring PDAF and 4K video recording at up to 60fps. The wider field of view makes it particularly useful for group selfies and video calls, while autofocus should improve consistency compared with fixed-focus alternatives.

OPPO uses a 50MP wide selfie camera with PDAF, a 21mm equivalent field of view, and 4K recording at up to 60fps. It offers strong hardware on paper, while gyro-EIS adds stabilization for video. OPPO’s higher-resolution sensor is appealing, but Pixel’s ultrawide framing gives it greater flexibility. Both are strong selfie systems.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 Pro wins for computational photography and its versatile 5x zoom, while OPPO offers stronger camera hardware. For predictable point-and-shoot results, Pixel has the edge.

4. Pricing

The Pixel 11 Pro is priced around $1,100 or ₹120,000, while the OPPO Find X9 Pro is priced around $1,000 or ₹100,000. That gives OPPO a meaningful price advantage despite offering a larger battery, faster charging, and a 200MP periscope telephoto camera.

Check Google Pixel 11 Pro Price on Amazon

The gap becomes more significant when the hardware is considered as a package. Pixel’s premium is easier to understand if long-term software support, Google’s ecosystem, and computational photography are priorities. However, buyers primarily comparing specifications get considerably more hardware from OPPO for less money. On pure hardware value, the Find X9 Pro looks difficult to beat.

Is the price justified?

The Pixel 11 Pro can justify its higher price through seven major Android updates, Google’s software experience, AI features, and camera processing. Those advantages matter to buyers intending to keep a phone for many years rather than upgrading frequently.

The Find X9 Pro offers five major Android updates, which is still substantial, but falls behind Google’s commitment. However, its stronger charging system, enormous battery, premium camera hardware, and broader feature set make its lower price especially compelling. OPPO delivers more physical hardware for the money, while Pixel makes a stronger case through software longevity.

Verdict

The OPPO Find X9 Pro offers better value for money, thanks to its lower price and substantially stronger battery and charging hardware. Pixel earns its premium through software longevity and camera processing.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

5. Conclusion

The Pixel 11 Pro stands out with seven major Android updates, Tensor G6 processing, UWB, satellite SOS, magnetic Qi2.2 wireless charging, and Google’s computational photography features. Its 5x periscope also gives it a different imaging strategy from OPPO’s high-resolution 3x telephoto. It is the more software-focused flagship, designed around Google’s ecosystem and long-term ownership.

Also ReadPixel 11 Pro XL vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Battery, Camera and Performance Compared

The Find X9 Pro answers with a 7,500mAh silicon-carbon battery, 80W wired charging, 50W wireless charging, IP69 protection, an IR blaster, and a 200MP periscope camera. Its hardware package is unusually aggressive for the price. For demanding users, frequent travelers, gamers, and anyone prioritizing endurance, OPPO offers more immediately useful hardware.

Verdict

Overall winner: OPPO Find X9 Pro. Its bigger battery, faster charging, versatile camera hardware, stronger durability, and lower price make it the more compelling all-round flagship. Pixel 11 Pro remains the better choice for long-term software support and computational photography.

FAQs

1. Which phone has the better camera, Pixel 11 Pro or Find X9 Pro?
The Pixel 11 Pro offers stronger computational photography, while OPPO provides more ambitious camera hardware and a 200MP telephoto.

2. Is the Pixel 11 Pro faster than the Find X9 Pro?
The Find X9 Pro has the stronger performance-focused chipset configuration, making it the better choice for demanding workloads and gaming.

3. Which phone has better battery life?
The Find X9 Pro should deliver longer battery life thanks to its significantly larger 7,500mAh battery.

4. Which phone offers better value for money?
The Find X9 Pro offers better value with a lower price and a stronger overall hardware package.

5. Should you buy the Pixel 11 Pro or Find X9 Pro?
Choose the Pixel for software longevity and Google’s camera processing; choose OPPO for battery, charging, performance, and hardware value.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

Pixel 11 Pro XL vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Battery, Camera and Performance Compared

By

-

Sep 12, 2026

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL and OPPO Find X9 Pro take different approaches to the premium Android phone. Pixel emphasizes computational photography, clean software, and long-term updates, while OPPO pushes hardware with a huge battery, faster charging, and a 200MP telephoto camera. The comparison matters for buyers deciding whether Google’s software experience or OPPO’s hardware advantage is more compelling.

Major Features:

Category	Google Pixel 11 Pro XL	OPPO Find X9 Pro	Winner
Display	6.8-inch LTPO OLED, 120Hz, 3600 nits peak	6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, 3600 nits peak	OPPO — Dolby Vision and broader HDR support
Build & Durability	Gorilla Glass Victus 2, aluminum frame, IP68	Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glass back, aluminum frame, IP68/IP69	OPPO — Stronger IP69 protection
Performance	Tensor G6, up to 16GB RAM, UFS 4.x	Dimensity 9500, up to 16GB RAM, UFS 4.1	OPPO — More performance-focused chipset and storage
Battery	5115mAh	7500mAh silicon-carbon	OPPO — Much larger battery
Charging	45W wired, 25W wireless	80W wired, 50W wireless	OPPO — Faster wired and wireless charging
Main Camera	50MP	50MP	Google — Stronger computational photography
Telephoto	48MP, 5x optical zoom	200MP, 3x optical zoom	Google — Greater native optical reach
Ultrawide	48MP	50MP	OPPO — Higher-resolution ultrawide
Selfie Camera	42MP ultrawide, PDAF	50MP wide, PDAF	OPPO — Higher-resolution selfie sensor
Video	Up to 8K at 30fps	Up to 4K at 120fps	Google — Higher maximum video resolution
Software Updates	Up to 7 major OS updates	Up to 5 major OS updates	Google — Longer update commitment
Unique Features	Qi2.2 magnetic charging, UWB, Satellite SOS	IR port, IP69, 10W reverse wireless charging	Google — More distinctive software and connectivity features
Price	Priced around $1300 / ₹135,000	Priced around $1000 / ₹100,000	OPPO — Lower price for stronger hardware
Overall	Software-focused flagship	Hardware-focused flagship	OPPO — Better overall hardware-to-price balance

Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.

Check OPPO Find X9 Pro Price on Amazon

1. Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Pixel 11 Pro XL combines Gorilla Glass Victus 2 with an aluminum frame and an IP68 rating, giving it a familiar premium flagship design. OPPO uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the front, a glass rear, aluminum frame, and stronger IP68/IP69 protection. Both offer ultrasonic fingerprint readers and stereo speakers, but OPPO feels more practically equipped for demanding everyday use.

Also ReadGoogle Pixel 11 Pro vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Which Phone Gives You More Value?

Display Quality

The Pixel has a slightly larger 6.8-inch LTPO OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and up to 3600 nits peak brightness. OPPO counters with a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display supporting Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, and 2160Hz PWM. Pixel’s higher resolution is appealing, while OPPO’s broader HDR support makes its screen more versatile.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro edges the display and durability category with IP69 protection, Dolby Vision, and an excellent AMOLED experience. Pixel remains compelling for sharper resolution and Google’s polished display tuning.

2. Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 Pro XL uses Google’s Tensor G6, paired with up to 16GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. OPPO uses the Dimensity 9500, also reaching 16GB RAM, with faster UFS 4.1 storage. OPPO’s flagship MediaTek chip looks stronger for demanding performance, while Pixel’s Tensor advantage lies more in Google’s AI-focused software integration.

Battery and Charging

This is where OPPO pulls decisively ahead. Its 7500mAh silicon-carbon battery supports 80W wired and 50W wireless charging, alongside 10W reverse wireless charging. Pixel’s 5115mAh battery supports 45W wired and 25W magnetic wireless charging, plus bypass charging. OPPO offers substantially more endurance and faster charging, making it the more practical choice for heavy users.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro wins the specifications and battery section. Its Dimensity 9500, UFS 4.1 storage, massive 7500mAh battery, and faster charging create a stronger hardware package.

3. Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Pixel’s triple-camera system pairs a 50MP main camera with a 48MP 5x periscope and 48MP ultrawide. OPPO uses a 50MP main sensor, 200MP 3x periscope, and 50MP ultrawide. Pixel offers greater native telephoto reach, while OPPO’s enormous 200MP telephoto sensor promises stronger detail and cropping flexibility. For versatile zoom photography, both are unusually well equipped.

Selfie Camera

The Pixel features a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera with PDAF and 4K video recording, while OPPO uses a 50MP wide selfie camera with PDAF and 4K recording. Pixel’s wider perspective can suit group shots and framing, but OPPO’s higher-resolution sensor gives it a stronger hardware advantage. Pixel’s image processing could still make the real-world comparison closer.

Verdict

Pixel 11 Pro XL wins for its 5x optical telephoto and established computational photography approach. OPPO is the more exciting hardware package, particularly for users who prioritize detailed zoom and camera versatility.

4. Pricing

The Pixel 11 Pro XL is priced around $1300 or ₹135,000, while the OPPO Find X9 Pro is priced around $1000 or ₹100,000. That creates a significant gap between two premium phones with broadly comparable flagship ambitions. Pixel asks buyers to pay more for Google’s software ecosystem and longer update commitment.

Check Pixel 11 Pro XL Price on Amazon

Is the price justified?

Pixel’s premium is easier to justify for buyers who prioritize seven major Android updates, Google’s AI features, Pixel photography, and a clean Android experience. OPPO offers substantially more battery capacity, faster charging, stronger storage, and an impressive 200MP telephoto for less money. For hardware-focused buyers, OPPO clearly offers better value.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro is the stronger value choice. Its lower price combined with a larger battery, faster charging, and impressive camera hardware makes the premium paid for Pixel harder to justify.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

5. Conclusion

The Pixel 11 Pro XL stands out with seven major OS updates, Tensor G6, Google’s computational photography, 5x optical zoom, magnetic Qi2.2 charging, UWB, and Satellite SOS. OPPO counters with a 7500mAh silicon-carbon battery, 80W charging, 50W wireless charging, IP69 protection, an infrared port, and a 200MP periscope. Each targets a different definition of a flagship.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro is the overall winner. It delivers stronger hardware, dramatically better battery endurance, faster charging, excellent cameras, and lower pricing, making it the more complete value-focused flagship.

FAQs

1. Which phone has the better camera, Pixel 11 Pro XL or OPPO Find X9 Pro?
The Pixel excels at computational photography, while OPPO offers impressive zoom hardware and greater sensor resolution.

Also ReadOPPO Find X9 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL: Camera, Performance, Pricing Compared

2. Is the OPPO Find X9 Pro faster than Pixel 11 Pro XL?
Yes. Its Dimensity 9500 is better suited to demanding gaming and sustained performance.

3. Which phone has better battery life?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro should last longer, thanks to its substantially larger 7500mAh battery.

4. Is Pixel 11 Pro XL worth the higher price?
It can be for buyers prioritizing Google’s software, AI features, camera processing, and longer update support.

5. Which phone should you buy overall?
Choose OPPO for hardware and value; choose Pixel for Google’s software experience and computational photography.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

iPhone Duo vs Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate: Apple vs the Wildest Foldable Yet

By

-

Sep 12, 2026

iPhone Duo and Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate are not simply two expensive foldables chasing the same idea. They represent two very different answers to the question of what a folding phone should become. The Duo turns a familiar iPhone into a larger, book-style device, while Huawei takes the concept much further with a tri-fold design that opens into a 10.2-inch tablet-like screen. That makes this comparison especially interesting for buyers who want more than another premium smartphone.

Also ReadiPhone Duo vs iPhone 18 Pro Max: $2,000 Foldable or Smarter Buy?

The choice is also less obvious than the price tags suggest. The iPhone Duo brings Apple’s A20 Pro chip, 120Hz OLED displays, advanced video recording and a tightly integrated iOS experience. Huawei counters with a larger canvas, 16GB RAM, a 5600mAh battery, faster charging and a three-camera system with a dedicated periscope lens. The real question is not which phone has more technology. It is which approach makes more sense when the novelty wears off.

Major Features:

Category	iPhone Duo	Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate	Winner
Design	Titanium frame, Ceramic Shield, IP68, stylus support	Tri-fold design, IP58/IP59, stylus support	Huawei — more innovative tri-fold design
Inner Display	7.6-inch LTPO OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision	10.2-inch LTPO OLED, 90Hz	Huawei — much larger tablet-style canvas
Cover Display	5.4-inch LTPO OLED, 120Hz	6.5-inch LTPO OLED, 120Hz	Huawei — larger external screen
Display Brightness	Up to 3000 nits peak	Not specified	Apple — significantly higher stated peak brightness
Performance	Apple A20 Pro, 12GB RAM	Kirin 9050 Pro, 16GB RAM	Apple — stronger flagship performance platform
Storage	Up to 2TB	Up to 1TB	Apple — offers twice the maximum storage
Main Camera	48MP wide + 48MP ultrawide	50MP wide + 50MP periscope + 40MP ultrawide	Huawei — more versatile triple-camera setup
Optical Zoom	No dedicated telephoto	3.5x periscope telephoto	Huawei — dedicated optical zoom camera
Video	Up to 4K 120fps, Dolby Vision, ProRes, spatial video	Up to 4K 60fps, HDR Vivid	Apple — much stronger video capabilities
Selfie Cameras	Under-display + 12MP cover camera	Dual 8MP cameras	Apple — higher-resolution cover camera
Battery	Li-Ion, fast wired charging	5600mAh silicon-carbon	Huawei — larger battery capacity
Wired Charging	50% in 20 minutes	66W	Huawei — faster charging hardware
Wireless Charging	25W MagSafe/Qi2	50W	Huawei — twice the stated wireless charging speed
Software	iOS 27	HarmonyOS 7.0	Apple — stronger ecosystem and software integration
Connectivity	Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, UWB, satellite features	Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, infrared port	Apple — broader premium connectivity features
Durability	IP68	IP58/IP59	Apple — stronger water and dust resistance
Price	Priced around $2,000 / ₹3,00,000	Priced around $2,800 / ₹2,80,000 based on supplied figures	Apple — stronger overall value proposition

Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.

Check iPhone Duo Price on Amazon

1. Design and Display

Build and Feel

The iPhone Duo feels like Apple’s attempt to make folding technology disappear into a conventional iPhone experience. Its titanium frame, Ceramic Shield protection and IP68 rating give it the sort of premium durability buyers expect from a flagship. More importantly, the hinge and subtle inner crease make the foldable format feel less experimental. Stylus support adds another layer of practicality for notes and creative work.

Huawei takes the bolder route. The Mate XT 2 Ultimate folds in three sections and uses an improved hinge design, while IP58/IP59 protection is a welcome upgrade for such a complex device. Its real appeal, however, is what happens when it opens. Instead of simply becoming a larger phone, it becomes something much closer to a compact tablet. That is the kind of difference that can genuinely change how the device is used.

Display Quality

The iPhone Duo’s 7.6-inch LTPO OLED display is arguably the more polished panel. It supports 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision and up to 3000 nits peak brightness, while the nano-texture and anti-reflective treatment should make the large screen easier to use in bright environments. The 5.4-inch cover display also keeps the 120Hz experience intact.

Huawei’s 10.2-inch LTPO OLED is the spectacle. It offers a 2232 x 3184 resolution, 1 billion colours and 90Hz refresh rate, with a 6.5-inch 120Hz outer display. The lower inner refresh rate is noticeable on paper, but the extra screen real estate is far more consequential for multitasking, documents and video. Huawei wins the size argument; Apple wins the refinement argument.

Verdict

The Mate XT 2 Ultimate has the more exciting display concept, but the iPhone Duo offers the better overall panel experience. Its 120Hz inner screen, higher peak brightness and refined viewing features make it easier to recommend for everyday use.

2. Specifications Including Battery

Performance

Apple’s A20 Pro gives the iPhone Duo the clearest performance advantage on paper. The 2nm chip is paired with 12GB RAM and storage options reaching 2TB. That combination should make demanding games, editing and multitasking feel effortless, while iOS 27 gives Apple greater control over how the foldable hardware and software work together.

Huawei responds with the Kirin 9050 Pro and 16GB RAM, giving the Mate XT 2 Ultimate more memory for its ambitious multitasking setup. That extra RAM makes sense when several apps are being used across the enormous screen. Still, Apple’s chip is the more convincing performance story. Huawei has built the more unusual device, but Apple appears to have built the faster one.

Battery and Charging

Huawei’s 5600mAh silicon-carbon battery is one of the Mate XT 2 Ultimate’s strongest hardware advantages. It supports 66W wired charging, 50W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging. Those numbers matter more here because Huawei is powering a much larger display and a device designed for intensive multitasking.

The iPhone Duo takes a more conservative approach, with wired fast charging and 25W MagSafe/Qi2 wireless charging. Apple’s advantage comes from efficiency and tight hardware-software integration rather than headline charging speeds. For people who regularly top up their phone during busy days, however, Huawei’s charging system is simply more impressive. It feels better matched to the ambition of the device.

Verdict

The iPhone Duo has the stronger performance platform, but Huawei wins battery and charging. For sustained heavy use, the Mate XT 2 Ultimate’s 5600mAh cell and 66W/50W charging setup are hard to ignore.

3. Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The iPhone Duo keeps things relatively simple with two 48MP rear cameras: a main sensor and an ultrawide. That may sound modest next to Huawei’s triple-camera setup, but Apple’s strength is video. The Duo supports 4K recording at up to 120fps, Dolby Vision HDR, ProRes and spatial video, giving it a serious advantage for creators who shoot as much video as they do photos.

Huawei’s hardware is more versatile for photography. Its 50MP main camera has a variable aperture, while a 50MP periscope telephoto provides 3.5x optical zoom and a 40MP ultrawide handles wider scenes. Laser autofocus and a colour-spectrum sensor add further flexibility. For portraits, distant subjects and general photographic experimentation, Huawei has the more interesting toolkit.

Selfie Camera

The iPhone Duo uses an under-display inner selfie camera alongside a 12MP cover camera with autofocus. That makes the internal screen cleaner and keeps the front-facing camera experience consistent with Apple’s broader video focus. It is a particularly sensible solution for a foldable, where a visible camera cutout can become more distracting on a large canvas.

Huawei uses 8MP selfie cameras, including one for the external display. The resolution is considerably lower than the rear cameras, but both support 4K video recording. Huawei’s approach is functional rather than headline-grabbing. For selfies alone, neither phone looks like the main reason to buy it; the rear-camera systems are where this comparison gets genuinely interesting.

Verdict

Huawei wins for camera versatility thanks to its dedicated 3.5x periscope and higher-resolution ultrawide. The iPhone Duo is the better choice for serious video, making the overall camera decision depend heavily on how the phone will be used.

4. Pricing

The iPhone Duo starts at $1,999 for the 256GB model, while higher-storage versions climb significantly further. In India, it is priced around ₹3,00,000. That puts it firmly into luxury-phone territory, but the entry model at least gives buyers access to Apple’s foldable experience without immediately moving into the highest storage tier.

The Mate XT 2 Ultimate is priced around ₹2,80,000, while launch pricing varies significantly by market and configuration. Huawei is asking buyers to pay for something few other phones can offer: a device that genuinely transforms from a phone into a large tablet-style display. That makes the comparison more complicated than simply looking at the price difference.

Is the price justified?

Neither phone is remotely aimed at mainstream value buyers. The iPhone Duo’s premium is easier to defend for users already invested in Apple’s ecosystem, particularly those who value performance, video, software support and a polished foldable experience. It feels like a very expensive iPhone rather than a technology demonstration.

Check Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate Price on Amazon

Huawei’s value proposition is stranger but arguably more exciting. The Mate XT 2 Ultimate combines a huge tri-fold display, 16GB RAM, a large battery, fast wireless charging and a highly versatile camera system. For buyers who will actually use that tablet-sized screen, the hardware premium makes sense. For everyone else, much of that extra technology risks becoming an expensive novelty.

Verdict

The iPhone Duo offers the safer value proposition because its strengths benefit almost every owner. Huawei offers more unusual hardware, but its premium only makes sense if the tri-fold design and tablet-sized display are central to the buying decision.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

5. Conclusion

The iPhone Duo’s biggest strength is how deliberately Apple has approached the foldable format. Its 120Hz displays, A20 Pro chip, advanced video capabilities, nano-texture inner screen and iOS integration make the hardware feel like an extension of the iPhone rather than a completely new category. It also brings a familiar ecosystem advantage that Huawei cannot easily replicate for international buyers.

Also ReadHuawei Pura X Max vs iPhone 17 Pro Max: Is Foldable Finally The Better Choice?

The Mate XT 2 Ultimate is the more ambitious piece of hardware. Its 10.2-inch tri-fold OLED display, optional privacy display, 16GB RAM, 5600mAh silicon-carbon battery, 66W wired charging and 50W wireless charging push the smartphone concept much further. The dedicated 3.5x periscope camera is another meaningful advantage. It is the phone that makes people stop and ask, “How is that even a phone?”

Verdict

The iPhone Duo is the overall winner, but it is far from an easy victory. The Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate is the more ambitious foldable, with a larger tri-fold display, more versatile cameras, bigger battery and faster charging. However, the Duo delivers the stronger all-round smartphone experience with its A20 Pro chip, 120Hz display, advanced video features, IP68 protection, up to 2TB storage and mature iOS ecosystem.

Huawei is the better choice for buyers who prioritise screen size and hardware innovation; the iPhone Duo makes more sense for those who want a premium foldable that feels polished and practical every day.

FAQs

1. Which phone is better for photography, iPhone Duo or Mate XT 2?
Huawei offers more camera versatility, especially for zoom photography, thanks to its dedicated 3.5x periscope telephoto lens.

2. Which phone is faster for demanding apps and gaming?
The iPhone Duo should deliver stronger sustained performance, thanks to Apple’s A20 Pro chip and tight hardware-software optimisation.

3. Which phone charges faster, iPhone Duo or Mate XT 2?
The Mate XT 2 charges faster, supporting 66W wired and 50W wireless charging for quicker top-ups.

4. Is the Mate XT 2 worth its premium price?
It can be, particularly for buyers who will use its tri-fold display, tablet-style multitasking and versatile camera system.

5. Which foldable offers better value for money?
The iPhone Duo offers better overall value, while Huawei makes more sense if its unique tri-fold design is the priority.

Read More:

Nothing OS 5.0 beta rolling out to Phone (4a) Pro, but two upgardes are missing

By

Vicky

-

Sep 12, 2026

The Nothing OS 5.0 Open Beta rollout went live last month, starting with the flagship Phone (3), and is now expanding to Phone (4a) Pro users. The Android 17-based update brings tons of changes across the software, including a redesigned control center, Lucent themes, expanded lock screen customizations, and new AI features.

The Nothing OS 5.0 beta update for the Phone (4a) Pro has been released a week later than the brand promised earlier. It comes with a total download size of 2.73GB. To get the beta update on your phone, you must first sign up for the beta program. We have a step-by-step guide for this you can find on this page.

Also ReadNothing OS 5.0 roundup: Rollout timeline, supported devices, and major upgrades

What upgrades does Nothing OS 5.0 beta offer to Phone (4a) Pro?

Nothing OS 5.0 is one of the biggest upgrades for Nothing phones in recent years. From new icons to building apps with AI, there are plenty of exciting changes packed into this major upgrade. As for the visual changes, there’s a redesigned Control Center with an iOS flavor, a brand-new theme, a separate notification panel, and upgraded status bar icons and animations.

The lock screen and home screen also receive notable upgrades, including wallpaper-adaptive colors for app icons and quick settings tiles, the Away Time and Collector widgets, Glyph Timer, and improved depth effects.

Nothing OS 5.0 strongly focuses on upgrading the AI capabilities on Nothing phones. It brings an upgraded on-voice engine and enables MCP support. There’s a new Smart Selection feature inside Essential Space that automatically groups, sorts, and organizes your scattered photos and screen captures. Plus, an Essential Apps Builder to allow users to build custom apps using text prompts.

Nothing phones finally receive a dedicated Glyph app, allowing users to control custom lighting animations, ringtone schedules, and sounds. The update package also includes several Android 17 core features, including expanded Dark Mode, cross-platform Quick Share, a floating screen recorder, improved privacy indicator, and isolated audio controls.

Two missing upgrades are coming with a stable release

Nothing OS 5.0 introduces two new clock faces: Gooey and Micrographics. “Gooey” features a bold, playful design and is being rolled out to beta devices, but “Micrographics”, which is inspired by mechanical typography, is still undergoing final development, and so it isn’t available to Phone (4a) Pro just yet.

Nothing has confirmed that the refreshed home screen is also under development.

These two unfinished upgrades will ship with the general release starting in October.

We’ll keep you posted with the latest updates on Nothing OS in our Nothing section. You can also join our Telegram channel to receive instant alerts.

iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

By

-

Sep 12, 2026

The foldable phone battle is getting more interesting as Apple and Samsung take very different approaches to large-screen smartphones. The iPhone Duo focuses on Apple’s ecosystem, display quality, and video capabilities, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra pushes multitasking, cameras, and desktop-style productivity. For buyers spending flagship money, the choice is far from straightforward.

Major Features:

Category	iPhone Duo	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra	Winner
Build	Titanium frame, Ceramic Shield, IP68	Armor Aluminum, Gorilla Glass, IP48	Apple — Better protection and more premium materials
Inner Display	7.6-inch OLED, 120Hz, 3000 nits	8-inch AMOLED, 120Hz, 3000 nits	Samsung — Larger display for multitasking
Cover Display	5.4-inch OLED, 120Hz	6.5-inch AMOLED, 120Hz	Samsung — More usable outer screen
Processor	A20 Pro	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5	Apple — Stronger flagship-class silicon
RAM	12GB	Up to 16GB	Samsung — More RAM for demanding multitasking
Storage	Up to 2TB	Up to 1TB	Apple — Offers twice the maximum storage
Rear Cameras	48MP + 48MP	200MP + 50MP + 10MP	Samsung — More versatile triple-camera system
Optical Zoom	Up to 2x optical-quality	3x optical	Samsung — Dedicated telephoto lens
Video	Up to 4K/120fps, Dolby Vision, ProRes	Up to 8K/30fps	Apple — More advanced professional video features
Selfie Cameras	12MP cover + under-display	10MP cover + 10MP inner	Apple — More capable cover camera setup
Battery	Li-Ion, fast charging	5000mAh, 45W	Samsung — Larger specified battery and reverse charging
Wireless Charging	25W MagSafe/Qi2	20W Qi2.2	Apple — Faster wireless charging
Software	iOS 27	Android 17, One UI 9	Samsung — Better multitasking and DeX support
Unique Features	Apple Pencil support, ProRes, MagSafe	Samsung DeX, reverse wireless charging	Samsung — More productivity-focused extras
Price in India	Priced around ₹3,00,000	Priced around ₹1,90,000	Samsung — Much better value for money
Overall	Premium Apple foldable experience	Versatile productivity-focused foldable	Samsung — Better overall hardware and value

Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.

1. Design and Display

Build and Feel

The iPhone Duo combines a titanium frame with Ceramic Shield glass and offers IP68 protection, giving it a more premium and reassuring construction. Samsung uses Armor Aluminum, Gorilla Glass protection and an IP48 rating. The Galaxy is also notably lighter, which makes it easier to carry and handle throughout the day. Apple’s titanium construction feels more luxurious, while Samsung’s design prioritises practicality. The iPhone Duo also supports a stylus, adding another layer of functionality for compatible workflows.

Also ReadiPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8: Apple Finally Takes on Samsung

Display Quality

The iPhone Duo has a 7.6-inch LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED panel with 120Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision and a nano-texture finish. Samsung counters with a larger 8-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display, 120Hz refresh rate and 3000-nit peak brightness. Both offer anti-reflective treatment, but Samsung’s larger canvas is better suited to multitasking and media. Apple’s display should appeal more to users who value colour, HDR and a premium viewing experience.

Verdict

Samsung wins for productivity thanks to its larger inner display and lighter design. The iPhone Duo counters with stronger water resistance, titanium construction, stylus support and an especially polished display experience.

2. Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The iPhone Duo is powered by Apple’s A20 Pro chip, paired with 12GB RAM and storage options reaching 2TB. Samsung uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, with up to 16GB RAM and 1TB storage. Both are designed for demanding apps and multitasking, but Apple’s chip gives the Duo a particularly strong performance foundation. Samsung’s extra RAM and Android flexibility make the Fold 8 Ultra more appealing for heavy multitasking and desktop-style workflows.

Battery and Charging

Samsung packs a 5000mAh battery and supports 45W wired charging, 20W wireless charging, and 4.5W reverse wireless charging. The iPhone Duo’s battery capacity is not specified here, but it supports 50% wired charging in 20 minutes and 25W MagSafe or Qi2 wireless charging. Samsung clearly has the more versatile charging setup. Reverse charging is also useful for powering accessories, giving the Fold a practical advantage for travellers and power users.

Verdict

The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra wins this section with its larger battery, faster wired charging and reverse wireless charging. The iPhone Duo remains compelling for users prioritising Apple’s high-performance silicon.

3. Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The iPhone Duo uses a dual-camera system with 48MP wide and 48MP ultrawide sensors. It supports advanced video recording, including Dolby Vision HDR, ProRes, and spatial video. Samsung goes further with a 200MP main camera, 10MP telephoto with 3x optical zoom, and 50MP ultrawide. It also records up to 8K. Samsung offers considerably more shooting flexibility, particularly for zoom photography. Apple’s advantage is its extensive professional video toolkit, which makes the Duo more attractive to serious video creators.

Selfie Camera

The iPhone Duo has an under-display selfie camera alongside a 12MP cover camera with autofocus. Samsung uses a 10MP inner ultrawide camera and a separate 10MP cover camera. Apple’s cover camera offers a more capable specification and autofocus, while Samsung gives users greater flexibility between the inner and outer screens. For everyday selfies and video calls, the iPhone Duo’s cover camera looks more versatile. Samsung’s dual-camera approach remains useful when switching between folded and unfolded use.

Verdict

Samsung wins for overall camera versatility with its high-resolution main sensor, dedicated telephoto, and 8K recording. The iPhone Duo is the stronger choice for buyers who prioritise advanced professional video features.

4. Pricing

The iPhone Duo is priced around $2,000 or ₹3,00,000, placing it firmly in ultra-premium territory. The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra is priced around $2,100 or ₹1,90,000 based on the supplied pricing. That makes Samsung significantly more affordable in India despite its higher approximate US price. For buyers comparing local value, the difference is substantial. The Fold also offers more RAM options, a larger battery and a more elaborate camera system at its Indian price.

Is the price justified?

The iPhone Duo’s premium can be justified by its titanium build, Apple silicon, advanced display technology, strong video capabilities and integration with the iOS ecosystem. However, the price gap makes Samsung considerably easier to recommend on pure hardware value. The Galaxy combines a bigger display, stronger camera versatility, a larger battery, and DeX support. For buyers focused on features per rupee, Samsung delivers the more convincing package.

Verdict

Samsung is the clear value winner based on the supplied Indian pricing. The iPhone Duo justifies its premium through Apple’s ecosystem, materials, display and video features, but costs considerably more.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

5. Conclusion

The iPhone Duo stands out with its titanium construction, Ceramic Shield protection, IP68 rating, nano-texture foldable display, Apple A20 Pro chip, MagSafe charging and advanced Dolby Vision, ProRes and spatial video capabilities.

Samsung counters with an 8-inch inner screen, 200MP main camera, 3x optical zoom, 8K recording, a 5000mAh battery, reverse wireless charging and Samsung DeX. Its lighter design also improves everyday practicality.

The two phones target different definitions of a premium foldable. Apple focuses on ecosystem polish and creator-friendly features, while Samsung leans harder into productivity, versatility and hardware value.

Also ReadiPhone Duo vs iPhone 18 Pro Max: $2,000 Foldable or Smarter Buy?

Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra is the overall winner. Its larger display, versatile cameras, bigger battery, DeX support and substantially lower Indian price make it the more complete foldable package.

FAQs

1. Is the iPhone Duo better for photography?
Samsung offers greater camera versatility, while the iPhone Duo is better suited to advanced video recording.

2. Which phone is faster for demanding apps?
The iPhone Duo’s A20 Pro delivers excellent performance, while Samsung offers more RAM for intensive multitasking.

3. Which foldable has better battery life?
Samsung has the larger 5000mAh battery and supports 45W wired charging, making it the stronger battery-focused choice.

4. Is the iPhone Duo worth its higher price?
It can be for Apple ecosystem users, but Samsung offers considerably more hardware value at its lower Indian price.

5. Which phone should buyers choose overall?
Samsung is the better all-round choice for buyers seeking productivity, camera versatility and stronger value.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

Xiaomi launches HyperOS 4 global beta program for these devices

By

Vicky

-

Sep 12, 2026

A month after the HyperOS 4 beta program was unveiled in China, it’s finally expanding to the global markets. Xiaomi has already begun the global beta rollout to three phones, with more scheduled to receive it later this month.

Xiaomi will release the HyperOS 4 global beta update to seven smartphones. The beta recruitment is already live for the first round of devices, which includes Xiaomi 17, Xiaomi 17 Ultra, and Xiaomi Leica Leitzphone. Remaining devices will be eligible for the beta program starting September 17th.

Also ReadNothing OS 5.0 roundup: Rollout timeline, supported devices, and major upgrades

First round (already live)

Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Xiaomi 17
Leica Leitzphone powered by Xiaomi

Second round (starting September 17th)

Xiaomi 17T Pro
Xiaomi 17T
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Xiaomi 15

The beta program isn’t being rolled out to all global markets at the same time. It’s currently limited to Global and EEA models, with more regions likely to join in the coming days and weeks.

The number of seats may be limited, so you must submit your application as early as possible. To apply for the beta program, go to Xiaomi Community > ME > Beta testing > Recruiting test and fill in the required details. If your application gets selected, you’ll soon receive a beta OTA update.

It’s important to note that beta builds are prone to bugs and errors. It’s also recommended to back up your important data before upgrading to HyperOS 4 beta. There won’t be easy going back, though. If you wish to roll back to HyperOS 3, you’ll need to flash the device.

Also Read5 new Android features rolling out in September that you need to know about

We’ll keep updating you with the latest details in our Xiaomi section. You can visit the page regularly or join our Telegram channel to stay updated.

Nothing Headphone (1) Pro tipped to launch September 29 with a three-driver setup including xMEMS

By

Also ReadNothing Headphone (a) vs Headphone (1): How the new affordable model compares with the flagship

-

Sep 12, 2026

Nothing is getting ready to step up its audio game with a more premium over-ear pair. The Headphone (1) Pro looks like a clear upgrade from their earlier model, aimed at people who want stronger sound and a few more refined features.

According to Dealabs, these should drop on September 29. It’s expected to be priced at €349 in Europe and $399 in the US. They’re coming in the usual black and white, keeping Nothing’s signature semi-transparent look but stepping it up with an aluminum shell and scratch-resistant glass. An IP52 rating means they can handle a bit of dust and light water, which is nice for everyday use.

The big audio jump is a three-driver setup where different drivers handle different frequency ranges. The high-frequency segment reportedly uses xMEMS, a solid-state micro-speaker system built entirely out of silicon, which is interesting.

The headphones also getting tuning help from Metropolis Studios in London (the same place that works on a lot of proper recording and mastering work), plus Hi-Res Audio certification and LDAC support. There’s a Flat EQ option and some more detailed “recording-grade” sound tools if you like tweaking.

On the noise-cancelling side, ten microphones power adaptive ANC, and there’s a transparency mode when you need to hear what’s going on around you. Connectivity covers Bluetooth 6.1 and a proper 3.5 mm jack (still useful). Battery life is claimed at up to 60 hours, with fast charging support.

Overall it feels like Nothing is trying to position this as a more serious, better-sounding version of their existing over-ears: multi-driver sound, studio input, and solid everyday durability. Nothing themselves haven’t officially confirmed specs yet.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Huawei Smart Screen S7 RGB 4K TVs with 55″/65″/75″ sizes now up for pre-order in China

By

Shop Huawei Smart TVs on Amazon

-

Sep 12, 2026

Huawei just opened pre-orders for its new Smart Screen S7 RGB, a smart TV that puts a big focus on better, more accurate colors. The big claim is upgraded backlight tech that should make everyday viewing look richer and more precise. The 55″ model starts at 3,999 yuan (~€513).

The key upgrade is RGB-MiniLED. Instead of the usual single-color backlight, this setup lets red, green, and blue light shine independently. Pair that with a super-focusing lens and you get less screen halo and cleaner, more accurate colors. Huawei says it covers 105% of the BT.2020 color gamut, about 66% more color richness than regular MiniLED TVs, and offers 94-bit color control precision.

A self-developed light-and-color control chip handles the brightness and color of each LED bead in real time. There’s also an AI color calibration algorithm that aims to keep things looking natural and with more depth. It uses a new high-end LCD panel that boosts brightness by 21%. The more efficient lighting and better packaging help with lower power use and heat management.

Also ReadBest Smart TV in 2026

All three sizes are 4K (3840×2160) on an LCD IPS hard screen. They run a native 120 Hz refresh rate, and with double-refresh tech they can go up to 300 Hz if you plug in a PC, console, or other device that actually outputs a 300 Hz signal. The TVs run HarmonyOS 4.3 with 3 GB of RAM and 64 GB of storage.

Audio depends on the size. The 55″ and 65″ models get two 12.5 W full-range speakers in a simple 2.0 setup at the bottom. The 75″ adds a pair of 12.5 W high-frequency speakers on top of that. All of them support Huawei’s Histen sound processing.

Price and availability:

Also ReadBest Mini-LED and 4K TVs under Rs 70,000 in India

There are three sizes: 55″ for 3,999 yuan (~€513), 65″ for 4,999 yuan (~€641), and 75″ for 6,999 yuan (~€898). Pre-orders are already live in China. The series is currently available exclusively in China.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source: Huawei)

Xiaomi launches Mijia Smart Range Hood 3 Max with 1,700 Pa suction, camera and PM2.5 sensor for smart control

By

Shop Xiaomi Mijia kitchen appliances on Amazon

-

Sep 12, 2026

Xiaomi just dropped a new flagship range hood that’s basically trying to make kitchen smoke a non-issue. The Mijia Smart Range Hood 3 Max is their most capable smoke-handling appliance yet, and it’s built to suck up fumes fast while using AI to react in real time.

Pre-orders are already open in China. The regular price sits at 5,999 yuan (~€770), but with the national subsidy it drops to 4,599 yuan (~€590). Xiaomi is calling it Mijia’s top smoke-purifying model, and the numbers back that up. Compared with the previous generation you get 34.6% more wind speed, an 89% jump in static pressure, and noise intensity cut by 84%.

There’s a four-vortex cyclone that grabs smoke right at the source, a high-speed backward-tilting airflow for those heavy stir-fry moments, and an air curtain that tries to keep the fumes from floating up into your face. Top fan speed hits 17.5 m/s, the highest Mijia has recorded, powered by a 360 W motor and eight “hurricane” suction levels. Max static pressure is 1,700 Pa.

Also ReadThe Best Xiaomi Mijia Gadgets You Can Actually Buy in 2026

A constant air-volume algorithm senses how much resistance the flue is giving and adjusts automatically, so it should still work properly whether you’re on the 1st floor or the 67th.

The smart side is where it gets interesting. A 3MP camera paired with a VLA visual model (trained on more than 100,000 real cooking clips) checks the smoke situation every 0.1 seconds and can change speed within 0.6 seconds. Xiaomi claims over 98% accuracy.

There’s also AI anti-overflow protection: it watches for a pot that’s about to boil over, sounds an alarm, and can even tell a compatible Mi Home cooktop to cut the heat. It keeps an eye on gas and smoke around the clock, has a micron-level PM2.5 sensor with a three-color display, and can push alerts to your phone through the Mi Home app. If it senses you need ventilation, it can turn itself on.

Other practical bits: negative-ion sterilization that Xiaomi says removes 97% of PM2.5 and hits 98% sterilization rates, an oleophobic coating on the impeller plus a smart dry-cleaning mode that doesn’t require taking anything apart, and durability testing equal to 1,680 hours that supports their claim of strong suction lasting ten years. Noise control uses 17 different design tricks and lands at 59 dB(A) on high power.

Also Read7 Unique Xiaomi Smart Home Products You Can Buy in 2026

It launches alongside the new Mijia Timer Gas Stove 3 Max, so Xiaomi is clearly pushing the whole smart-kitchen ecosystem. If you do a lot of high-heat cooking and hate lingering smells or constant filter cleaning, this looks like a big step up in what a connected range hood can do.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source: Xiaomi Youpin)

Lenovo IdeaPad Vibe vs MacBook Neo: Which is the best budget laptop?

By

Rajesh Regmi

-

Sep 11, 2026

Lenovo has put its new IdeaPad Vibe in a very interesting spot. It starts at $699.99, exactly the same price Apple now charges for the MacBook Neo after raising its price from the original $599. With both laptops targeting buyers who want a relatively affordable machine, the similar pricing makes the comparison hard to ignore.

Of course, a spec sheet can’t tell you everything. Keyboard feel, trackpad quality, display tuning, and overall software experience still need to be tested in person. But the specifications already show that Lenovo and Apple are taking very different approaches to the budget laptop market.

Check MacBook Neo Price on Amazon

Check Lenovo IdeaPad Vibe Price on Amazon

1. Same price, different approach

Apple’s pitch with the MacBook Neo was always about restraint. You get a 13-inch Liquid Retina display, an A18 Pro chip borrowed from the iPhone 16 Pro, 8GB of unified memory, and a fanless body that starts at 256GB of storage. No upgrades once you buy it, no configuring your way to more RAM later. What you order is what you live with.

Lenovo’s IdeaPad is more flexible. It comes in 14- and 15-inch sizes, with a choice of AMD Ryzen AI 400 or Snapdragon X chips, and RAM that tops out at 32GB on the AMD side versus the Neo’s fixed 8GB. Storage runs up to 1TB, and Lenovo’s sticking dual SSD slots in there so you can add capacity down the line instead of committing upfront. If you’re the type who keeps a laptop for five years and wants room to grow into it, that alone tips things in Lenovo’s favor.

Also ReadThe Best Windows Laptops for Work and Productivity in 2026

2. More colors, more customization

Apple gave the MacBook Neo a more colorful look than its usual Mac lineup. It comes in Blush, Citrus, Indigo, and Silver, unlike the classic silver and gray finishes on pricer Macs.

Lenovo, meanwhile, offers even more options. It comes in seven Pantone-developed colors including Dreamy Violet and Radiant Coral, and Lenovo also sells interchangeable keycaps separately. It’s a small thing, but it gives the IdeaPad Vibe a more personal look. I

There is one important catch, though. If you want an OLED display, your color choices are limited to Moody Blue and Lowkey Grey. The other finishes come with a 120Hz IPS panel instead.

3. Lenovo wins on ports

The difference in connectivity is much easier to see. The MacBook Neo has two USB-C ports and a 3.5mm headphone jack. And that’s fine if most of your accessories are wireless or USB-C, but if you have peripherals like monitors, SD cards, and other devices, you’ll definitely need a separate adapter.

The IdeaPad Vibe is much more practical here. It has two USB-A ports, two USB-C ports, HDMI, and a microSD card reader, along with Wi-Fi 7 support. The USB ports are limited to 5Gbps, so this isn’t a laptop designed around extremely fast external storage. But for everyday use, having more built-in ports means fewer dongles to carry around.

4. The Neo is lighter, but Lenovo has a bigger battery

Apple still has an advantage when it comes to weight. The MacBook Neo weighs 1.23kg, while the 14-inch IdeaPad Vibe starts at 1.3kg. The Neo also has a 36.5Wh battery, which Apple claims delivers up to 16 hours of video playback.

Lenovo hasn’t published an official battery-life rating yet, but the AMD version can be equipped with a battery as large as 65Wh. That doesn’t automatically mean it will last longer than the Neo, since battery life also depends heavily on the processor and software, but the larger capacity gives Lenovo some room to work with.

The webcams also favor Lenovo. The Neo uses a 1080p FaceTime HD camera without a physical privacy shutter. The IdeaPad Vibe has a 5MP IR camera with a privacy cover and Windows Hello support.

5. Performance is still the big unknown

This is the one area where it’s difficult to conclude without actually testing the laptops. Apple’s A18 Pro is already a known quantity, and the company’s close control over its hardware and software means the Neo’s 8GB of memory doesn’t necessarily tell the whole story. For browsing, writing, streaming, and other everyday tasks, it should be more than capable.

Lenovo’s Ryzen AI 400 and Snapdragon X options are also promising, particularly for users who want more RAM and on-device AI capabilities. With up to 32GB of memory, the IdeaPad Vibe also has a clear advantage for heavier multitasking.

Still, processor performance isn’t something you can judge from core counts and memory numbers alone. Cooling, software optimization, battery settings, and the difference between Windows and macOS all matter.

Apple is also reportedly working on a MacBook Neo successor with an A19 Pro chip and more RAM for next year, so the current Neo is unlikely to remain the company’s entry-level MacBook for long.

6. Which one makes more sense?

The MacBook Neo is still the simpler option. If you’re already using an iPhone and other Apple devices, want a lightweight laptop, and mainly need something for browsing, writing, streaming, and everyday work, the Neo is a no-brainer.

On the other hand, the IdeaPad Vibe is more flexible with more ports, more RAM, more storage options, two SSD slots, larger screen choices, and far more customization. Those things become more useful if you plan to keep the laptop for several years.

The biggest catch is the display and color trade-off. If OLED matters to you, you’ll have to choose between just two IdeaPad Vibe colors. Lenovo’s AMD models are expected to arrive in October, while Snapdragon versions are scheduled for November.

Until both laptops have been properly tested, it’s too early to say which one is faster or better overall. But at the same $699.99 starting price, the IdeaPad Vibe clearly offers more flexibility on paper, while the MacBook Neo keeps things simple. Which approach makes more sense will mostly depend on whether you value Apple’s simpler experience or Lenovo’s upgradeability and wider range of hardware options.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

iPhone Duo vs iPhone 18 Pro Max: $2,000 Foldable or Smarter Buy?

By

-

Sep 11, 2026

iPhone Duo and iPhone 18 Pro Max represent two very different interpretations of Apple’s flagship future. The Duo brings a foldable design, larger internal display, and stronger multitasking potential, while the Pro Max remains focused on conventional smartphone refinement and camera hardware.

Also ReadiPhone Duo vs Pixel 11 Pro Fold: Apple or Google for Your Next Fold?

Both phones share Apple’s A20 Pro chip, iOS 27, 120Hz OLED technology, and premium connectivity. That makes the decision less about raw performance and more about how you’ll actually use the phone. The Duo is designed to change shape around different tasks, whereas the Pro Max prioritizes a familiar experience with fewer compromises. For buyers spending flagship money, the key question is whether to choose flexibility or traditional refinement.

Major Features:

Category	iPhone Duo	iPhone 18 Pro Max	Winner
Design	Foldable titanium design with glass panels and stylus support	Traditional glass-and-aluminum flagship design	Duo — More versatile design
Display	7.6-inch 120Hz LTPO OLED + 5.4-inch cover display	6.9-inch 120Hz LTPO OLED	Duo — Larger, more flexible viewing
Durability	IP68, Ceramic Shield 2, titanium hinge and frame	IP68, Ceramic Shield 2, aluminum frame	18 Pro Max — Simpler conventional build
Performance	A20 Pro, 12GB RAM	A20 Pro, 12GB RAM	Duo — Equal performance
Rear Cameras	Dual 48MP wide + ultrawide	Triple 48MP wide + ultrawide + 4x telephoto	18 Pro Max — More complete camera system
Zoom	No dedicated telephoto camera	100mm periscope telephoto with 4x optical zoom	18 Pro Max — Better zoom capability
Selfie Camera	Under-display camera + 12MP cover camera	18MP autofocus camera	18 Pro Max — Stronger selfie hardware
Video	Up to 4K 120fps, Dolby Vision, ProRes, spatial video	Up to 4K 120fps, Dolby Vision, ProRes RAW, Apple Log 2	18 Pro Max — More advanced pro video features
Battery	Li-Ion, 25W MagSafe/Qi2	Up to 5,567mAh, 25W MagSafe/Qi2	18 Pro Max — Larger battery capacity
Charging	50% in 20 minutes wired	50% in 15 minutes wired	18 Pro Max — Faster wired charging
Multitasking	Large foldable display designed for multitasking	Conventional large-screen interface	Duo — Better productivity potential
Gaming	7.6-inch 120Hz internal display	6.9-inch 120Hz display	Duo — More immersive screen
Entertainment	Larger 7.6-inch OLED when unfolded	6.9-inch OLED	Duo — Bigger viewing area
Portability	Folds into a compact phone	Conventional slab design	Duo — More adaptable form factor
Storage	256GB to 2TB	256GB to 2TB	Duo — Equal storage options
Connectivity	Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, USB-C 3.2 Gen 2	Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, USB-C 3.2 Gen 2	Duo — Similar connectivity
Price	Priced around $2,000 / ₹3,00,000	Priced around $1,300 / ₹1,80,000	18 Pro Max — Better value
Overall	More versatile foldable experience	More balanced flagship package	18 Pro Max — Better cameras and value

Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.

1. Design & display — foldable vs traditional

The iPhone Duo is the more radical design, opening into a 7.6-inch LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED display with 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10 and Dolby Vision. Its Nano Texture finish and anti-reflective coating also make the large screen better suited to reading and productivity.

The iPhone 18 Pro Max counters with a 6.9-inch 120Hz OLED panel that remains simpler and more conventional. It gets Ceramic Shield 2, an anti-reflective coating and the same impressive brightness ratings, making it arguably the safer choice for everyday durability and consistency.

Verdict: iPhone Duo wins for display versatility and sheer screen area, while the Pro Max feels more straightforward and familiar.

2. Performance — same A20 Pro, but different form factors

Both phones use Apple’s A20 Pro chip built on a 2nm process, paired with 12GB RAM and storage options reaching 2TB. On paper, that creates a remarkably even performance battle, with both capable of demanding apps, editing and intensive AI features.

The bigger difference comes from how that performance is used. The Duo’s foldable screen provides more room for multitasking, while the Pro Max offers a conventional interface optimized around a single large display. Neither has an obvious chipset advantage, so everyday speed should be similarly excellent.

Verdict: Tie. The A20 Pro makes both flagships performance powerhouses, with the Duo gaining practical advantages from its foldable format.

3. Cameras — Duo’s flexibility vs Pro Max’s superior camera hardware

The iPhone Duo uses a dual rear-camera system with 48MP wide and 48MP ultrawide sensors. It supports advanced 4K recording, Dolby Vision HDR, ProRes and spatial video, while its foldable design can provide more creative framing flexibility.

The iPhone 18 Pro Max goes further with three 48MP rear cameras, adding a 100mm periscope telephoto with 4x optical zoom and a LiDAR scanner. Its 18MP autofocus selfie camera is also considerably more sophisticated than the Duo’s under-display camera. For serious photography, the Pro Max is the stronger choice.

Verdict: iPhone 18 Pro Max wins because its dedicated telephoto and LiDAR hardware give it a more complete camera system.

4. Battery — important because foldables have different usage patterns

The iPhone Duo’s battery has to power two displays and a larger internal screen, making real-world endurance particularly important. Its wired charging reaches 50% in 20 minutes, while 25W MagSafe and Qi2 wireless charging offer respectable convenience for a foldable flagship.

The iPhone 18 Pro Max has a large battery, with market-dependent capacities listed around 5,391mAh or 5,567mAh. It also reaches 50% in about 15 minutes through wired charging. Its conventional display should make power management more predictable than on the Duo.

Verdict: iPhone 18 Pro Max wins for predictable endurance, while the Duo remains competitive for users who prioritize its larger screen.

5. Multitasking & productivity — major Duo advantage

This is where the iPhone Duo makes the biggest case for itself. Its 7.6-inch internal display provides substantially more workspace for reading documents, browsing, managing multiple apps and editing content. The foldable format can effectively transform a phone into a miniature productivity device.

The Pro Max has plenty of screen real estate for conventional smartphone tasks, but it cannot replicate the Duo’s tablet-like canvas. Its advantage is simplicity: everything works within a familiar slab-style interface without requiring users to adapt to a folding design.

Verdict: iPhone Duo wins easily for productivity, especially for users who frequently multitask, read or work from their phone.

6. Gaming & entertainment — 7.6-inch Duo display vs 6.9-inch Pro Max

The iPhone Duo’s 7.6-inch internal OLED screen is naturally more immersive for games, movies and streaming. Its 120Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision and large viewing area create a more expansive entertainment experience, while stereo speakers complement the bigger canvas.

The iPhone 18 Pro Max still delivers an excellent entertainment experience with its 6.9-inch 120Hz OLED display. It is arguably more convenient for quick gaming sessions because the screen requires no unfolding, while its conventional design also avoids foldable-specific distractions.

Verdict: iPhone Duo wins for immersive gaming and video, although the Pro Max is more convenient for quick, casual sessions.

7. Portability — compact when folded vs conventional slab

The iPhone Duo becomes substantially more compact when folded, making its form factor particularly interesting for pockets and bags. It can also function like a conventional smartphone through its 5.4-inch cover display, then open when a larger workspace is needed.

The iPhone 18 Pro Max takes the familiar approach of remaining a single-screen smartphone at all times. There is no hinge or folding mechanism to manage, which makes the experience simpler and potentially more reassuring for buyers who prefer conventional hardware.

Verdict: iPhone Duo wins for adaptable portability, while the Pro Max remains the better fit for buyers who prefer uncomplicated traditional hardware.

8. Price & value

The iPhone Duo is priced around $2,000 / ₹3,00,000, putting it firmly into luxury territory. That premium buys a foldable display, more versatile form factor and productivity benefits, but those advantages only justify the cost for users who will regularly exploit them.

The iPhone 18 Pro Max is priced around $1,300 / ₹1,80,000, making it dramatically cheaper while offering the same A20 Pro platform, 12GB RAM and a stronger camera system. For most buyers, it delivers considerably more conventional flagship value.

Verdict: iPhone 18 Pro Max wins on value. The Duo’s premium is justified only if its foldable functionality is central to the buying decision.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

9. Who should buy which?

The iPhone Duo makes more sense for buyers who want something genuinely different from a conventional iPhone. Its foldable display, multitasking potential and larger entertainment canvas suit users who read extensively, work on the move or want one device serving both phone and mini-tablet roles.

Also ReadiPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8: Apple Finally Takes on Samsung

The iPhone 18 Pro Max is better suited to buyers prioritizing cameras, battery predictability, gaming performance and traditional flagship usability. Its triple-camera system, periscope zoom and LiDAR give enthusiasts more photographic flexibility without paying the Duo’s substantial premium.

Verdict: Choose iPhone Duo for flexibility and productivity; choose iPhone 18 Pro Max for cameras, value and a more conventional flagship experience.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

Dwarflab launches Draco, a portable smart telescope built for serious astrophotography

By

Check Dwarflab Draco Price on Amazon

-

Sep 11, 2026

Dwarflab has announced the Draco, a new smart telescope that integrates a 90mm aperture and automated tracking into a 5.5 kg (12.1 lbs) unit. The device is designed to simplify deep-sky astrophotography by automating the alignment and capture process, while still offering the hardware necessary for long exposures.

Dwarflab Draco Specifications

The Draco can capture single-frame exposures lasting up to 300 seconds. Standard alt-azimuth telescope mounts often suffer from field rotation during long exposures, which can make stars appear blurred as the sky moves.

To solve this, the Draco physically rotates its CMOS image sensor to keep up with the movement of the sky. Its built-in guide scope monitors tracking and corrects errors in real time. The metal base can also be tilted to switch the telescope into equatorial mode, so there is no need for a separate mounting system.

Optically, the telescope features a folded f/3.8 design with a 340mm focal length. The primary telephoto camera uses a 1/1.3-inch, 50-megapixel sensor. When shooting dim deep-sky targets like galaxies, the system applies 2×2 pixel binning to output 12-megapixel images. This increases the effective pixel size to 2.4µm, which improves light collection and reduces noise.

For brighter targets within the solar system, the Draco uses the sensor’s full 50-megapixel resolution to capture finer details. The telescope also includes a secondary wide-angle camera with a 23.3mm equivalent focal length for capturing wider landscapes and Milky Way shots.

Dwarflab offers the Draco in two configurations. The Standard Edition costs $1,399 and comes with a built-in H+O dual-narrowband filter for capturing emission nebulae, along with an internal ND filter for solar imaging. The app automatically switches to the ND filter when you want to observe the Sun.

If you want more complex narrowband data, the SHO Edition is available for $1,599. This model replaces the internal ND filter with an S+O filter. The system can automatically sequence the two internal filters to capture Sulfur, Hydrogen, and Oxygen data, which the app then combines into standard blue-and-gold SHO images. Solar imaging on the SHO model requires manually attaching an included external ND filter.

The companion app handles key smart telescope functions such as autofocus, plate solving, and live stacking with automatic dark-frame calibration. Pro Mode gives you manual control over exposure and gain, while support for FITS and TIFF exports lets you process raw data using external editing software.

The hardware is powered by a 10,000 mAh battery that provides up to five hours of runtime. It also features active sensor cooling to mitigate thermal noise during long sessions. Pre-orders are currently open on Dwarflab’s website, with shipping estimated in three months.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Dwarflab)

🔌 You’ll Need50MP stacked exposures and FITS/TIFF exports fill storage fast — a high-capacity microSD card keeps sessions running. Check 256GB microSD card price on Amazon →

iPhone 17 series gets more expensive worldwide following iPhone 18 series debut

By

Check iPhone 17 Price on Amazon

-

Sep 11, 2026

Apple has bumped up the prices on a bunch of current iPhone models right after launching its newest ones, which is the opposite of what smartphone brands usually do.

The increases hit the iPhone 17, iPhone 17e, iPhone Air, and iPhone 16. Each one is now $100 more expensive than it was before. In the US, that puts the base iPhone 17 at $899, the iPhone 17e at $699, the iPhone Air at $1,099, and the 128GB iPhone 16 at $799. The new prices are rolling out everywhere these models are still being sold.

Also ReadiPhone 17 vs iPhone 16: Full Comparison, Differences, and Verdict

This is unusual because Apple typically drops the price of last year’s phones once the fresh ones arrive. The current hikes are being tied to an ongoing shortage of memory chips, driven by heavy demand from AI data centers. Apple has already done similar price increases on other products like Macs, iPads, and HomePods because of the same rising component costs.

In India the new starting prices are ₹99,900 for the iPhone 17, ₹1,49,900 for the iPhone Air, ₹79,900 for the iPhone 17e, and ₹89,900 for the iPhone 16. The changes came after Apple announced the iPhone 18 Pro series and the new foldable iPhone Duo, at which point it also pulled the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max from its direct lineup.

The timing shows how tightly supply-chain issues are still squeezing consumer prices, even on phones that have been out for a while. Carrier deals and trade-in offers might still soften the blow for some buyers, but the official list prices going up is a clear break from Apple’s usual playbook and a sign that component costs continue to ripple through the whole smartphone market.

🔌 You’ll NeediPhone 17 ships without a wall adapter, so a 20W USB-C charger is needed for fast charging. Check Apple 20W USB-C charger price on Amazon →

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source: 1, 2)

LG denies claims that its TVs listen to their surroundings and log data even when offline

By

-

Sep 11, 2026

Some pretty serious privacy claims about smart TVs have been floating around, and LG has just pushed back hard.

It started with a long investigation from the YouTube channel Gamers Nexus, made with security researchers, that looked closely at LG smart TVs. The video claimed the sets keep logging and uploading data even when they’re offline or in standby, scan the local Wi-Fi network, pick up audio, and identify other devices on the home network.

Also ReadBest Smart TV in 2026

The researchers said the built-in mic could still capture ambient sound while the TV looked like it was switched off, with that audio stored locally and possibly sent later. They backed it up with packet captures and firmware analysis, and also talked about Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) tech used to identify what’s on screen.

LG responded in a statement to Tom’s Hardware and basically said the main claims aren’t true. According to the company, its TVs only process voice data in two specific situations: when you press and hold the voice button on the remote, or when the far-field voice recognition feature is turned on and it hears the wake word (“Hi LG”).

Outside of those cases, LG says the TVs do not collect or record ambient conversations. Any audio used just for detecting the wake word stays on the device and gets deleted if there’s no match, nothing is sent to LG’s servers.

LG did admit that its smart TVs can scan for other devices on the same local network. It called this a normal feature that lots of smart TVs and connected home products use to handle device connections and content sharing. On the ACR side, the company said it’s an optional setting that needs user consent and can be turned off. Data from ACR isn’t used for advertising unless you specifically allow it.

Also ReadBest Mini-LED and 4K TVs under Rs 70,000 in India

LG stressed that users still control the privacy settings and that security is something they keep monitoring and updating. They didn’t respond to every single secondary claim in the video, but the statement clearly focuses on the biggest privacy worry, continuous eavesdropping, and tries to reassure people that isn’t happening.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source)

Vivo Buds Clip, Watch 6 design, launch date confirmed; X500 Pro Max unboxed

By