Huawei has officially set the date for its next major product event. The company confirmed today that the ‘HarmonyOS 7 | Huawei Mate XT 2 and All-Scenario New Product Launch Event’ will take place on September 7.
As the name implies, the Huawei Mate XT 2 tri-fold phone will be the highlight of the event alongside HarmonyOS 7.
The tri-fold is also expected to get a redesigned hinge that could reduce the visible crease. Huawei may also switch to UFG glass on the screen for improved durability. The device could come in Mystic Black, Auspicious Red, Crimson Purple, and the usual white finish.
Huawei has not confirmed any of these details yet. Still, they would make sense as upgrades to the original Mate XT. The first-generation model featured a 10.2-inch display when fully unfolded and had a body that was just 3.6mm thick at its thinnest point. Despite its high price, the phone reportedly sold more than 400,000 units.
For the Mate XT 2, Huawei will need to keep the phone thin while making the three-hinge design more durable. That will be especially important for a device with such a large folding screen and multiple moving parts.
HarmonyOS 7 will also take center stage
The software could be just as important as the hardware. Huawei officially introduced HarmonyOS 7 in June, and the September event should give us a better look at how it works on a tri-fold phone.
HarmonyOS 7
A device like the Mate XT 2 puts more pressure on the software than a standard foldable. Huawei needs to handle multiple windows, resize apps across three different screen layouts, and make switching between folded and unfolded modes feel seamless.
For now, Huawei has not shared an official specification sheet, so most of the Mate XT 2’s hardware details remain unconfirmed. We won’t have to wait much longer, though.
TECNO is clearly obsessed with ultra‑thin smartphones. We’ve already seen the POVA Slim and the SPARK Slim, and now the CAMON series finally gets its own Slim variant. But this one is fundamentally different from the previous two. Inside and out, it feels like TECNO’s definitive answer to what a slim phone should be. And we’re not kidding—this is easily the most refined TECNO handset we’ve ever laid hands on.
The CAMON Slim comes in a two‑layer box. You start by sliding off the outer sleeve, then lifting the lid to reveal the phone itself. We’ll get to the device in a moment, though, because all the accessories are tucked underneath. Most of them are fairly standard — a SIM ejector tool, a clear case, a 60W charger, and a USB cable. But there’s one item that stands out: the Side Port Sealing Stickers. And that’s something you don’t see every day.
You probably know that when applying a UV adhesive glass screen protector, the buttons and ports are the easiest places for glue to seep into and cause problems. These stickers are designed to seal them off before installation. Such a thoughtful little accessory.
As always, let’s start with its biggest selling point—the thickness. The CAMON Slim is only 6.39mm thick. Combined with the curved display, the frame visually narrows down to less than 4mm. Admittedly, it isn’t the thinnest smartphone in the world, but the first time you hold it, it’s still genuinely impressive.
Making a phone thin is just the foundation of the CAMON Slim. What really sets it apart from its two older brothers is the color design. The one I have here is the Jungle Green version, featuring a crystal-like texture with a beautiful gradient finish. It has plenty of personality without being overly flashy, and it’s easily my favorite color option.
If you prefer something bolder, there are also the New Mondrian and Van Gogh Blue versions. Just from their names and appearances, you can probably tell which masterpieces they pay tribute to.
Beyond the sleek design, the CAMON Slim proves it’s built to last. It boasts both IP68 and IP69 ratings for water and dust resistance, and has also passed U.S. military‑grade drop tests (MIL‑STD‑810H). Audio-wise, it doesn’t just settle for stereo speakers — it also supports Dolby Atmos for a more immersive listening experience.
There’s also an interesting feature hidden inside the camera module: 354 built-in Mini LEDs. Notifications, music playback, and charging can all trigger different lighting effects. Of course, you can also customize your own text or patterns, making it both practical and highly personalized. So if you’ve been looking for another phone with an LED matrix display, here’s a new option.
Display & Camera
The CAMON Slim features a 6.78-inch AMOLED display, with a 144Hz refresh rate. It also supports 2160Hz PWM dimming, making it more comfortable on your eyes during extended use. The bezels aren’t the absolute narrowest, but at least all four sides are evenly sized.
On the back, the CAMON Slim features a 50MP Sony LYT-600 main camera. The other lens that looks like a camera is actually a flicker sensor.
Although it’s a single-camera setup, the image quality from the main camera is quite good for its price. Photos are sharp, colors are accurate. Even when you zoom in to 2×, the image stays surprisingly sharp. It’s perfectly capable of handling everyday photography.
Performance & Battery
Under the hood, the CAMON Slim is powered by the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate — a capable entry‑level chipset that scores around 620,000 points on AnTuTu Lite. It’s not designed to handle graphically intensive games, and expecting it to do so would be a stretch. However, for everyday tasks like web browsing, social media scrolling, video streaming, and light casual gaming, it handles everything with ease — and for most users, that’s more than enough.
Performance isn’t really the issue here — the real drawback is that the Helio G200 Ultimate is a 4G‑only platform. While 5G only truly outshines 4G in download speeds, its absence still leaves a lingering sense of “what if” that’s hard to ignore.
On the software front, HiOS 16 — built on Android 16 — delivers a clean, fluid experience. TECNO is also promising five years of support, including three major Android OS upgrades, which is exceptionally generous for a phone at this price point.
The AI experience is surprisingly competitive, even outperforming some better‑known brands. Not only does the phone include almost every AI feature you’d expect from a modern Android device, but it also lets you freely switch between five major LLMs — with zero regional restrictions. TECNO’s openness here is genuinely impressive and way beyond what I anticipated.
For a phone this slim, fitting in a 5,600mAh battery is nothing short of impressive engineering. In daily use, the battery easily lasted me through a full day with plenty to spare. Charging is also well taken care of, with 60W speeds that are excellent by TECNO’s standards. The only compromise? There’s simply no room for wireless charging — but honestly, that’s a trade‑off most users will be happy to make given the slim profile.
Conclusion
The CAMON Slim is a phone with a crystal‑clear identity: slim, stylish, and built to last. It’s not without compromises — the 4G‑only chipset will be a dealbreaker for some, and the single‑camera setup feels almost unconventional for the CAMON lineage. But then again, this phone was never meant to be everything to everyone.
Its target audience is refreshingly specific: budget‑conscious users who want a phone that feels unobtrusive in daily life without being dull. At the end of the day, a smartphone is just a tool. And sometimes, the best tools are the ones you forget are even there.
Xiaomi has added a new model to its study lamp lineup, the Mijia Vertical Study Lamp 2C. It arrives a few months after the more expensive Mijia Vertical Study Lamp 2, but this version costs less while keeping many of the same lighting features.
The 2C weighs around 8.5kg and uses a base with an 11-degree anti-tipping design on both the front and back. The lamp head is only 28mm thick with touch buttons on the upper post that let you change modes without opening the app. Xiaomi says the lamp also meets national and EU safety standards.
Bright light with a wide coverage area
The lamp produces up to 11,000 lumens of light, enough to cover a room of up to 14 square meters. Its light-emitting surface sits about 1.3 meters above the desk, while the lamp head measures 80 cm long and spreads light evenly across the work area. The wide light source should also help reduce shadows from your hands while reading or writing.
Xiaomi is using a dual-light setup on the Lamp 2C, with the upper and lower lights split roughly in an 8:3 ratio. The upper light produces up to 8,000 lumens, while the lower light adds another 3,000 lumens. Both use diffuse reflection to spread the light instead of shining it directly downward.
The lamp has an Ra98 color rendering rating and a 4000K color temperature. It also has a full-spectrum GFC rating above 0.985, which makes the light similar to natural sunlight. For eye safety, the 2C meets the RG0 blue-light exemption standard. It also has a UGR rating below 13, meaning glare should be kept to a minimum during use.
The Mijia Vertical Study Lamp 2C is now available in China for 1,199 yuan (~ $178). The standard Lamp 2, in comparison, costs 2,349 yuan ($342).
After AnTuTu, the Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 has appeared on Geekbench for the first time in an unannounced iQOO device. The scores come from an iQOO 16 prototype carrying the model number V2606A.
On Geekbench 6.7, the chip scored 3,434 in the single-core test and 9,334 in the multi-core test, but these numbers are far below what you would expect from a new-generation chip. For comparison, the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 inside the iQOO 15 scored 3,649 in single-core and 10,682 in multi-core testing. That means this early result actually trails last year’s chip in both tests.
What’s surprising is that the two prime cores are actually clocked at an impressive 5.01GHz, making it the first smartphone SoC to reach desktop-level clock speeds. Meanwhile, the Dimensity 9600 Pro from MediaTek is capped at 4.55GHz, as shown in another recent Geekbench run.
Beyond the prime cores, the three performance cores run at 4.03GHz, while the three efficiency cores are clocked at 3.74GHz. Graphics duties are handled by the new Adreno 850 GPU.
It’s worth remembering that this benchmark comes from an engineering sample rather than a finished retail device. Early units often run unfinished software and may have less optimized power management, both of which can drag benchmark scores down before launch.
The same chip recently posted a strong AnTuTu result above 4.8 million points, so this low Geekbench score looks more like an early software issue than a sign of weak performance.
Once retail units confirm the real numbers, this chip’s standing will be reflected in our Snapdragon chipset rankings.
Those leaked promo images and the Geekbench listing from earlier this week were right on the money. Sony has now officially unveiled the Xperia 10 VIII at a press conference, and the phone looks almost exactly like the leaks suggested.
Sony is sticking with the same clean, notch-free, and punch-hole-free design it has used for years. The bezels on the sides are fairly slim, while the top and bottom are noticeably thicker than those on most phones in this price range. Up front, there’s a 6.1-inch OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate. Sony says the screen is also 50% brighter than the one on last year’s model.
The device retains the familiar camera shutter button on the right side, while the dual speakers have been updated for what Sony says is fuller sound.
Around the back, the Xperia 10 VIII has a dual-camera setup. It includes a 50MP main camera with a 1/1.56-inch sensor and a 13MP ultra-wide camera.
The battery is also unchanged. The Xperia 10 VIII packs a 5,000mAh cell, and Sony once again claims the phone can last for up to two days on a single charge.
The Same Chip Makes a Return
Inside, things are even more familiar. The Xperia 10 VIII runs on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, paired with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. It ships with Android 16.
The problem is that the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 is the same chip used in the Xperia 10 VII. So while the new phone gets some design and software changes, don’t expect a big jump in performance.
The biggest new feature comes from the software. Sony has added a Point & Pay function that lets you double-press the power button to access payment QR codes and loyalty cards quickly.
The Sony Xperia 10 VIII is priced at 599 Euros (~ USD 698). The phone will launch in Europe starting from mid to late September.
An early Geekbench listing from an unreleased Vivo phone has given us the most detailed look yet at MediaTek’s upcoming flagship chipset.
A Vivo X500 Pro Max test unit (model V2610) has shown up on Geekbench Browser running an unreleased MediaTek processor labeled “MT6995(ENG).” This is widely believed to be the Dimensity 9600 Pro. The entry currently offers the clearest view we have of the CPU layout and maximum clock speeds ahead of MediaTek’s expected September launch.
The Geekbench data points to an eight-core design split into three clusters, with a dual-prime-core setup: two cores that can hit up to 4.55 GHz, three cores peaking at 4.35 GHz, and three cores running at a base of 3.10 GHz. In this particular test the prime cores were limited to just 2.8 GHz, so the scores don’t reflect the chip’s full potential.
The 2+3+3 arrangement matches earlier information from tipster Digital Chat Station, who described two “Canyon” cores (thought to be Arm’s still-unannounced C2-Ultra), three “Gelas-B” cores, and three “Gelas” cores, the same name used for the C1-Pro cores in the Dimensity 9500. If this checks out, it would be the first time MediaTek has used two ultra-large prime cores in a flagship Dimensity chip.
The listing also names the GPU as “Mali-G2-Ultra-NX MC12,” which lines up with previous reports. Arm hasn’t officially announced the G2 series yet, though related hardware has already given some early hints about its performance. Other details from the entry include 11.05 GB of usable RAM (pointing to 12 GB installed) and a “release-keys” signing status that’s typical of pre-production devices.
MediaTek hasn’t confirmed the Dimensity 9600 Pro yet. Earlier leaks suggest it will be built on TSMC’s N2P (2 nm) process. Estimated Geekbench 6 scores for engineering samples are sitting in the 4,200–4,300 single-core and 12,000–12,500 multi-core range, though MediaTek’s pre-launch projections have often been higher than what the final retail chips actually deliver.
Timex has released a new analog watch (TW2Y89300) in the US market. The Expedition Sierra Chronograph is now available on the company’s website for $179. It is a traditional battery-powered quartz watch, offering standard timekeeping and stopwatch functions rather than any connected or smart features.
The watch features a 43mm case made of brass, finished in a brushed silver tone. With a case height of 12.5mm and a lug-to-lug measurement of 52mm, it is a relatively standard size for a modern chronograph, though it might feel a bit large on smaller wrists.
The face is protected by mineral crystal. This is a common material for watches in this price range, providing basic heat and scratch resistance, though it won’t be as durable as the sapphire crystal typically found on more expensive models.
On the dial, Timex went with a straightforward tan color scheme. It uses standard Arabic numerals for the hours and includes a small date window. The chronograph function is displayed across three sub-dials located at the 12, 9, and 6 o’clock positions.
To make the dial easier to read, the main hands and hour markers are coated with luminescent paint for low-light visibility, and the central second hand is painted yellow for a bit of visual contrast.
The watch runs on a standard quartz analog movement powered by an SR920SW battery. The stopwatch function is operated by two standard pushers located above and below the crown, allowing you to start, stop, and reset the timer.
For water resistance, the Expedition Sierra is rated to 100 meters. This means it is fine for surface swimming, snorkeling, or getting caught in the rain, but it is not built for scuba diving. Timex also says that you should not press the chronograph buttons while the watch is wet or submerged.
The model ships with a 20mm tan fabric strap that secures with a basic buckle. According to specs, the strap is designed to fit wrist circumferences between 5.9 and 8.1 inches.
Acemagic has launched the F2A mini PC with Intel Panther Lake processors, offering local AI processing and modern connectivity. It is priced at $1,099 during the preorder period, down from the stated $1,699 regular price, with shipping set to begin on August 31.
The F2A features an Intel Core Ultra X7 358H processor with 16 cores, built on the Intel 18A process and using a hybrid core design. It includes a 50 TOPS NPU for AI workloads, while the CPU, NPU, and integrated graphics together deliver up to 180 TOPS of theoretical AI performance.
For graphics, the F2A relies on an integrated Arc B390 GPU, based on the Xe3 architecture. It includes 12 Xe-cores and supports modern standards like AV1 encoding and decoding, ray tracing, and XeSS upscaling.
Inside the 128 x 128 x 37 mm case, the F2A comes with 32GB of soldered LPDDR5X memory and a 1TB NVMe SSD. It supports up to 4TB of storage through two M.2 2280 slots, with one supporting PCIe 4.0 and the other PCIe 5.0.
For connectivity, the front panel includes a 40Gbps USB4 Type-C port, which Acemagic says supports external GPU (eGPU) expansion for those who need more graphics power than the integrated chips can provide, alongside two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports, and a 3.5mm audio jack.
The rear panel houses an HDMI 2.1 TMDS port, a DisplayPort, dual 2.5Gbps Ethernet jacks, two USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A ports, and a secondary 20Gbps USB-C port that supports 100W power delivery input and DP 1.4. For wireless networking, it includes Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4.
The mini PC can drive up to four displays simultaneously, including an 8K monitor through DisplayPort 2.1. The F2A ships with Windows 11 Pro, though Acemagic says it also supports Linux and Ubuntu.
In related news, Minisforum has recently launched the Elite M2 Air-304 Mini PC with an Intel Core 3 304 processor, dual 2.5GbE LAN, and up to 64GB RAM, while Acemagic has launched the F9A Mini PC with an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor, up to 128GB RAM, and Oculink eGPU support.
Leaked photos have given us a rare peek inside what looks like Apple’s Private Cloud Compute server hardware, and it appears to be running on the company’s own M5 silicon.
Images shared by X user @hsuchingpo show a rack-mount enclosure packed with multiple compute modules. Each module sits on a PCIe-style card with blue ejector latches, clearly designed so technicians can hot-swap them. A service diagram visible in the photos lists 14 numbered board positions, each with its own Apple part number (APN).
A close-up of one module shows a single M5 package under thermal paste, with VRM circuitry along the lower edge of the board and a gold edge connector that plugs into the backplane. The board itself has an Apple-style part-number sticker that reads 631-13397.
A wider shot of the chassis reveals a fully populated server blade. The compute modules are lined up across carrier bars, with each bar holding eight boards. Two of these rows are visible, connected by a central heat-pipe manifold. The service diagram taped inside the lid (listing positions 0 through 13 with unique APNs) points to a modular setup meant for field replacement rather than a fixed, single-board design. It’s possible the full chassis can hold more modules than the two rows shown, or the diagram might not line up perfectly with a symmetrical layout.
While the M5 isn’t as powerful as Apple’s higher-end workstation chips like the M3 Ultra in terms of raw multi-core processing, its higher efficiency means multiple units can be packed densely into one enclosure without major thermal headaches. Apple’s Private Cloud Compute setup relies on device-class silicon instead of traditional server processors, essentially extending the company’s on-device privacy approach to larger-scale AI work in the cloud.
While the photos could be showing an engineering or pre-production configuration, they give us one of the clearest public looks yet at how Apple may be building its secure cloud AI systems.
Honor has launched a new budget phone called Play 20A globally. It comes with a large display and a secondary rear screen. Let’s check out its key specs.
The Play 20A comes with a 6.9-inch IPS screen. The panel features slim bezels and a 90Hz refresh rate, which is standard for current mid-tier and budget devices, offering smoother scrolling than older 60Hz panels.
To support a screen of this size, the phone includes a 6,000mAh battery. Internally, the Play 20A runs on a MediaTek G81 processor. This is an entry-level chipset, which means the phone is built for standard daily tasks like web browsing, messaging, and video streaming rather than demanding applications or intensive gaming.
The device features a secondary display that lets you take selfies with the 13-megapixel main camera. It also shows notifications, call alerts, and media controls for quick access to basic functions.
The device comes with 128GB of internal storage, and you can expand this up to 1TB using a microSD card. For security, the device uses a side-mounted fingerprint sensor built into the frame.
The Play 20A will be available in three colors: Midnight Black, Light Blue, and Starry Purple. The company hasn’t revealed any pricing and availability details yet.
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
Leaked CAD models suggest Samsung is looking at some pretty big design changes for its next Ultra flagship, including a new camera arrangement and possibly even different sizes.
Well-known leaker Sonny Dickson has shared CAD renders that appear to show two slightly different sizes for what was first thought to be the Galaxy S27 Ultra. The side buttons sit in different positions on each model, which has sparked talk that Samsung might offer the Ultra in two sizes, a bit like how Apple does with its differently sized Pro phones. Another possibility is that the smaller one is actually the rumored Galaxy S27 Pro.
The designs also point to a new camera plateau on the back. Some people have noted that it looks quite a bit like the iPhone 17 Pro’s camera island, which would be a clear break from Samsung’s long-standing vertical camera setup. A camera hardware refresh is widely seen as overdue at this point. In particular, the current 3x telephoto, built around a small 1/3.94-inch 10MP sensor, is expected to be dropped. Getting rid of it could free up space inside for bigger batteries and maybe even allow magnets around a Qi2 charging coil.
Earlier leaks also suggest the four-year-old ISOCELL HP2 main sensor could be replaced by something more modern, like a 200MP ISOCELL HPC that might handle 3x–5x zoom as well.
In a follow-up, leaker Ice Universe clarified that the smaller CAD model is actually the Galaxy S27 Pro rather than a second Ultra size. According to him, both the S27 Ultra and S27 Pro would get the new camera plateau design. Of course, this is still unofficial and should be taken with a grain of salt until Samsung confirms anything.
These CAD-based claims give us an early (and still speculative) look at what Samsung might be planning for its 2027 flagships. We’ll have to wait until much closer to the official launch for solid details on the design, cameras, and exact model lineup.
HMD seems to have started rolling out a refreshed version of its entry-level tablet in a new market, complete with some promotional pricing and freebies.
According to an X post by tipster smashx_60, the HMD T21 2nd Edition is now available to buy in Nepal. This follows earlier signs that HMD was working on a new tablet. One thing to note: HMD doesn’t have a dedicated website for Nepal, and the tipster didn’t name a specific retailer, so independent confirmation is still a bit tricky at this point.
The tablet is being offered in two configurations under early-bird pricing. The 4GB RAM + 128GB storage model is listed at रु24,999 (around €140), while the 8GB RAM + 256GB version is priced at रु29,699 (about €166) and is set to become available in September. These are described as introductory prices, so the regular retail price will likely be higher. Anyone who buys during the early-bird window is also said to get three free extras: a screen protector, a mobile stand, and a 16oz travel mug.
Specs-wise, the HMD T21 2nd Edition is pretty much the same as the original T21, with the main upgrades being the addition of an 8GB RAM option and more storage. It has a 10.36″ IPS display with 2K resolution and stylus support. Power comes from a Unisoc T7225 processor, and there’s a microSD card slot for expandable storage.
You also get dual 8MP cameras (front and rear), stereo speakers, a 3.5mm headphone jack, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 5, 4G LTE, and NFC. The battery is 8,200 mAh with 18W wired charging, and it carries an IP52 rating for basic dust and water resistance. It ships with Android 15 out of the box.
In short, the HMD T21 2nd Edition is a light refresh of the previous model. It offers more memory options and a newer software version, but the same core hardware underneath. We’ll probably hear more about wider availability and final pricing once the tablet starts showing up in other markets.
According to Lei, the month will begin with the launch of Xiaomi SkyNomad, a family-focused SUV lineup built on the Kunlun platform. The Xiaomi 18 Fold is confirmed to tag along, too. And while Lei doesn’t mention it, it’s likely that we will also see the Xiaomi Pad 9 Pro Max launching at the same event. The latter two are powered by Xiaomi’s new XRING O3 chip.
The XRING O3 has already made some big claims. It reportedly scored 5.22 million points on AnTuTu, making it the first smartphone chip to cross the 5 million mark. The chip uses a 3nm process and packs 24 billion transistors into a 133mm² design, which is 26% larger than the previous XRING O1.
Its 10-core CPU also scored more than 15,000 points in multi-core testing. And Xiaomi’s new G2-Ultra NX GPU is said to deliver 85% better graphics performance while using 64% less power.
Xiaomi 18 Pro Brings a New Snapdragon Chip
The Xiaomi 18 Pro series will arrive toward the end of September. Its biggest upgrade is expected to be the sixth-generation Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 chip. Unlike O3, the Gen 6 will use a newer 2nm process.
The previous generation used a 3nm process, so the move to 2nm is expected to increase transistor density by around 30%. That could bring better performance, lower power use, and more stable performance during longer periods of heavy use.
XIaomi 18 Fold preorders go live in China
The Xiaomi 18 Pro series is also expected to support 100W wired charging, the N79 5G band, and UWB connectivity.
With the Sky Nomad SUVs, Xiaomi’s first foldable phone, and the Xiaomi 18 Pro series all arriving in the same month, September is sure to be the company’s busiest launch period this year.
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
Baseus has launched the new PicoGo AR11 20,000mAh power bank in China, expanding on the 10,000mAh version introduced earlier this year. It is priced at 299 yuan (around $44) and features two built-in cables alongside standard USB ports, with support for up to 100W fast charging.
In terms of design, the power bank includes an 80cm retractable USB-C cable that uses a constant-force mechanism, which Baseus says is rated to withstand 20,000 pulls.
Next to it is a shorter 25cm fast-charging cable that can be detached and replaced if it wears out over time. Alongside, the device also includes one standard USB-C port and one USB-A port.
The PicoGo AR11 can deliver up to 100W from a single port, which is enough to charge most USB-C laptops at standard speeds. When charging multiple devices at once, the power bank splits the output. If you use the built-in USB-C cable and the standard USB-C port together, they output 65W and 35W, respectively.
If all three outputs are active, the built-in cable stays at 65W, while the remaining ports share 15W. The unit itself recharges at a maximum of 65W, taking about 40 minutes to reach a 50% charge with a compatible wall adapter.
The power bank features an NFC chip that lets you check its battery health, current temperature, and voltage by simply tapping a compatible smartphone against it. To manage heat during high-wattage charging, the device uses a combination of a graphene cooling array and an aerogel insulation layer.
Physically, the power bank weighs 495 grams and comes in a silver finish with rounded edges. Its 73Wh capacity keeps it well under the 100Wh limit set by aviation authorities, meaning it can be taken on commercial flights.
It supports standard charging protocols like USB PD, PPS, and QC, and includes a low-current mode for safely charging smaller devices like wireless earbuds and smartwatches.
Vivo X300e and Xiaomi 17T Pro take different approaches to the flagship smartphone experience. Vivo emphasizes battery endurance, selfie photography, and Snapdragon performance, while Xiaomi pushes camera versatility, display technology, and faster charging. The real question is whether Xiaomi’s broader feature set is worth paying more.
Major Features:
Category
Vivo X300e
Xiaomi 17T Pro
Winner
Build & Protection
Glass body, aluminum frame, IP68/IP69
Gorilla Glass 7i, aluminum frame, IP68
Vivo — stronger water protection
Display
144Hz AMOLED, HDR, 5000-nit peak
144Hz AMOLED, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3500-nit peak
Xiaomi — richer display features
Processor
Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Dimensity 9500
Xiaomi — higher-end overall package
RAM & Storage
Up to 12GB + 512GB
Up to 16GB + 1TB
Xiaomi — more memory and storage
Main Camera
50MP, OIS, 1/1.56″
50MP, OIS, 1/1.31″
Xiaomi — larger sensor
Telephoto
50MP periscope, 3x optical zoom
50MP periscope, 5x optical zoom
Xiaomi — longer optical zoom
Ultrawide
8MP with autofocus
12MP
Xiaomi — higher-resolution ultrawide
Selfie Camera
50MP autofocus, 4K
32MP, 4K HDR10+
Vivo — higher-resolution AF selfie
Video
Up to 4K
Up to 8K, 4K 120fps
Xiaomi — much stronger video
Battery
7200mAh
7000mAh
Vivo — larger capacity
Wired Charging
90W
100W
Xiaomi — faster charging
Wireless Charging
No
50W
Xiaomi — wireless charging support
Reverse Charging
Reverse wired
22.5W reverse wired
Xiaomi — faster reverse charging
Price/Value
Priced around $700 / ₹68,200
Priced around $900 / ₹75,000
Vivo — lower entry price
Overall
Strong battery and selfie package
More complete flagship package
Xiaomi — more versatile overall
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
The Vivo X300e uses a glass front and glass back with an aluminum frame, giving it a premium and refined appearance. Its IP68/IP69 rating provides particularly strong protection against dust and water, making it well suited to users who want durability without compromising on a polished design. Xiaomi uses Gorilla Glass 7i on both sides with an aluminum frame and IP68 protection. The Xiaomi 17T Pro feels more rugged and premium, while the Vivo X300e has a slightly more elegant character.
Both smartphones feature AMOLED displays with a 144Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling, animations and gaming. Vivo offers 1B colors, HDR support and an impressive 5000-nit peak brightness. Xiaomi counters with Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3840Hz PWM dimming and a 3500-nit peak brightness. Xiaomi’s display is therefore more feature-rich for movies and HDR content, while Vivo’s higher peak brightness is particularly appealing for outdoor visibility.
Verdict
Xiaomi wins with its Dolby Vision, HDR10+, advanced PWM dimming and more comprehensive multimedia features.
2. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Vivo X300e is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 and comes with up to 12GB RAM and UFS 4.1 storage. Xiaomi uses the Dimensity 9500 and offers up to 16GB RAM with as much as 1TB storage. Both processors target flagship-level performance and should handle demanding games, multitasking and intensive applications comfortably. Xiaomi has the advantage for users who want maximum memory and storage flexibility.
Vivo packs a larger 7200mAh battery with 90W wired charging and reverse wired charging. Xiaomi uses a 7000mAh battery but supports faster 100W wired charging, 100W PPS, 50W wireless charging and 22.5W reverse wired charging. Vivo should appeal to users prioritizing battery capacity, while Xiaomi’s charging versatility feels considerably more premium.
Verdict
Xiaomi wins because it combines strong battery capacity with faster wired charging, wireless charging and broader memory configurations.
3. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
The Vivo X300e features a 50MP OIS main camera, a 50MP 3x periscope telephoto and an 8MP ultrawide camera with autofocus. Zeiss optics further strengthen its photography credentials. Xiaomi features a larger 50MP main sensor, a 50MP 5x periscope telephoto and a 12MP ultrawide camera. The longer optical zoom and larger primary sensor give Xiaomi a stronger setup for detailed photography, especially at distant subjects. Its Leica lens system also adds to the premium imaging package.
Selfie Camera
Vivo has a 50MP autofocus selfie camera capable of 4K video recording. This is a notable advantage for users who frequently take selfies or record themselves. Xiaomi uses a 32MP front camera with 4K recording and HDR10+ support. Although Xiaomi offers advanced video features, Vivo’s higher-resolution autofocus camera is more appealing for detailed front-facing photography.
Verdict
Xiaomi wins overall thanks to its larger main sensor, 5x optical zoom, stronger ultrawide camera and significantly more advanced video capabilities.
4. Pricing
The Vivo X300e is priced around $700, which is approximately ₹68,200 based on the supplied pricing. The Xiaomi 17T Pro is priced around $900, while its supplied Indian price is approximately ₹75,000. This makes Vivo the more affordable option, although the difference between the supplied Indian prices is relatively modest. Xiaomi therefore targets buyers willing to spend more for a broader flagship feature set, while Vivo offers a more accessible entry point.
The Vivo X300e offers strong value with a Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 processor, 7200mAh battery, 3x periscope camera, Zeiss optics and a 50MP autofocus selfie camera. Xiaomi’s higher price is justified by its stronger camera hardware, Dolby Vision display, 100W charging, 50W wireless charging and higher memory and storage options. The Xiaomi package feels more complete for buyers seeking flagship-level versatility.
Verdict
Vivo wins on value, while Xiaomi justifies its higher price with a broader and more capable feature set.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
5. Conclusion
The Vivo X300e stands out with its 7200mAh battery, 50MP autofocus selfie camera, Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 chipset, Zeiss optics and IP68/IP69 protection. It is particularly attractive for buyers who prioritize battery endurance, selfies and value. The Xiaomi 17T Pro brings a more comprehensive flagship package with Dolby Vision, 3840Hz PWM dimming, Leica optics, a 5x periscope camera, 8K video recording, 100W wired charging, 50W wireless charging and up to 1TB storage.
Verdict
Xiaomi 17T Pro is the better overall smartphone for buyers seeking the strongest combination of camera versatility, display technology, charging and storage. The Vivo X300e remains an excellent alternative for those prioritizing battery capacity, selfie photography and lower pricing. For buyers willing to pay more for broader flagship capabilities, Xiaomi offers the more complete package.
FAQs
1. Which phone is better for gaming? The Xiaomi 17T Pro is better suited to demanding gaming, with its Dimensity 9500 chipset and higher RAM options.
2. Which phone takes better zoom photos? The Xiaomi 17T Pro offers better long-range photography thanks to its 5x optical periscope zoom.
3. Which phone has better battery endurance? The Vivo X300e has the larger battery, making it the stronger choice for users prioritizing maximum capacity.
4. Is the Xiaomi 17T Pro worth its higher price? Yes, for buyers wanting advanced cameras, faster charging, wireless charging and greater storage flexibility.
5. Which phone should you buy overall? Choose Xiaomi 17T Pro for flagship versatility; choose Vivo X300e for lower cost and a larger battery.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
Apple isn’t expected to officially unveil its highly anticipated foldable iPhone Ultra until next month, but luxury customization brand Caviar is already showing off what the device will look like, at least what it will look like wrapped in nearly twenty thousand dollars worth of sterling silver.
Design Details
Caviar has announced Liquid Metal, a new custom chassis designed specifically for the upcoming foldable iPhone Ultra. Joining seven other pre-existing designs on the company’s roster, the Liquid Metal variant replaces the phone’s standard exterior with a custom panel crafted entirely from 925 sterling silver.
According to the company, the design is meant to evoke the look of fluid metal frozen in motion. The silver is shaped into a heavy sculptural relief and finished with a high mirror polish, creating a rippling effect across the back of the device that shifts depending on how the light hits it. The standard Apple logo has also been swapped out for a three-dimensional version, also cast in sterling silver.
Unlike many of Caviar’s previous custom jobs, which often feature excessive jewels, gold filigree, or fragments of meteorites, the Liquid Metal design relies solely on the raw material and its reflective properties. It’s a slightly more modern approach to ultra-luxury tech, leaning closer to a piece of contemporary metal sculpture than a traditional piece of jewelry.
Pricing and Availability
Naturally, this level of customization comes with an exorbitant price tag. The Liquid Metal iPhone Ultra starts at $18,840 for the base 256GB model, and Caviar is limiting production to just 17 pieces worldwide. The device ships in branded packaging that includes a signature 24K gold-plated Caviar key.
While Caviar’s renders and physical mockups give us a very clear look at the dimensions and hinge structure of the upcoming foldable, the underlying hardware remains unconfirmed by Apple. We will have to wait for Apple’s official keynote next month to see the standard, non-silver iteration of the iPhone Ultra.
Tecno Pova 8 Pro and Realme 16x 5G target different segments, with Tecno focusing on performance, display quality and premium features, while Realme emphasizes affordability and battery life. This comparison looks at their design, specifications, cameras, pricing and overall value.
Major Features:
Category
Tecno Pova 8 Pro
Realme 16x 5G
Winner
Display
6.78-inch AMOLED, 144Hz, HDR, 4500 nits peak
6.81-inch IPS LCD, 144Hz, 1200 nits HBM
Tecno — AMOLED and higher brightness
Resolution
1208 × 2644 pixels
720 × 1570 pixels
Tecno — Much sharper panel
Protection
Gorilla Glass 7i, IP68/IP69K
Panda-1681, IP65, MIL-STD-810H
Tecno — Stronger water protection
Performance
Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, up to 12GB RAM
Dimensity 6300, up to 6GB RAM
Tecno — Much faster chipset
Storage
Up to 512GB
Up to 256GB + microSD
Tecno — Higher internal capacity
Main Camera
50MP, OIS, dual-pixel PDAF
50MP, autofocus
Tecno — OIS and better focusing
Secondary Camera
8MP ultrawide
None
Tecno — More versatile setup
Selfie Camera
13MP
8MP
Tecno — Higher resolution
Battery
6500mAh
7000mAh
Realme — Larger capacity
Charging
45W wired, 50W reverse, bypass charging
45W wired, 45W PPS, 7W reverse
Tecno — More charging features
Audio
Stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res
Single loudspeaker
Tecno — Better audio setup
NFC
Yes
No
Tecno — NFC included
Infrared
Yes
No
Tecno — IR blaster included
Connectivity
Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.4
Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.3
Tecno — Newer wireless standards
Software
Android 16, HiOS 16
Android 16, Realme UI 7.0
Tie — Both run Android 16
Price/Value
Priced around $530 / ₹50,000
Priced around $310 / ₹26,000
Realme — Much cheaper
Overall
More powerful and feature-rich
More affordable and battery-focused
Tecno — Superior overall hardware
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
The Tecno Pova 8 Pro offers a more premium and feature-rich design, with IP68/IP69K protection, an in-display fingerprint scanner and a distinctive Matrix display on the rear. The Realme 16x 5G has IP65 protection, MIL-STD-810H compliance and drop resistance, giving it a practical durability advantage. However, Tecno’s combination of stronger water protection and its more unusual rear design makes it feel more distinctive and better equipped for users who want something beyond a conventional smartphone.
Display Quality
The Pova 8 Pro is far ahead in display technology. Its AMOLED panel supports a 144Hz refresh rate, HDR, 1B colors and up to 4500 nits peak brightness. Realme also offers 144Hz, but its IPS LCD panel has a much lower resolution and lower brightness. Tecno therefore delivers deeper blacks, richer colors, better contrast and sharper visuals. For gaming, streaming and everyday multimedia, the AMOLED panel feels substantially more premium and enjoyable.
Tecno wins with its superior AMOLED display, stronger protection and more distinctive design.
4. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Tecno Pova 8 Pro has a major performance advantage with the 4nm MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, Mali-G615 graphics and configurations reaching 12GB RAM and 512GB storage. The Realme 16x 5G uses the 6nm Dimensity 6300 with Mali-G57 graphics and up to 6GB RAM with 256GB storage. Tecno is consequently better suited to demanding games, multitasking and heavier applications. Its newer chipset and higher memory ceiling also make it the more convincing choice for buyers planning to keep the phone for several years.
Battery and Charging
Realme carries a larger 7000mAh battery, giving it an advantage for users who prioritize endurance. Both phones support 45W wired charging, but Tecno adds 50W reverse wired charging and bypass charging. These extras make the Pova 8 Pro more useful for gaming and charging other devices, although Realme remains the better option when maximum battery capacity is the priority.
Tecno wins for performance and charging versatility, while Realme wins battery capacity.
3. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
The Tecno Pova 8 Pro has the more versatile camera system. Its 50MP primary camera includes dual-pixel PDAF and OIS, while an additional 8MP ultrawide camera expands shooting flexibility. The Realme 16x 5G also has a 50MP primary camera with autofocus, but it lacks an ultrawide lens and OIS. Tecno’s setup is therefore better suited to landscapes, group photography and steadier handheld shooting. OIS should also help produce more stable results in lower-light situations and while recording video.
Selfie Camera
Tecno continues its advantage with a 13MP front camera, compared with the 8MP selfie camera on Realme. Both support video recording, but the higher-resolution Tecno camera should offer more detail for selfies and video calls. For users who regularly use the front camera, the Pova 8 Pro feels like the more complete package and offers greater flexibility for casual photography.
Verdict
Tecno wins with OIS, an ultrawide camera and a higher-resolution selfie camera.
2. Pricing
The Tecno Pova 8 Pro is priced around $530 / ₹50,000, while the Realme 16x 5G is priced around $310 / ₹26,000. Realme is therefore considerably cheaper, making it attractive for buyers working with a tighter budget. However, the price gap also reflects a significant difference in hardware. Tecno offers a better AMOLED display, faster chipset, stronger camera setup, higher memory options and additional connectivity and gaming features.
The Pova 8 Pro’s higher price is justified for buyers who want a substantially more capable smartphone rather than simply a large-battery device. Realme offers better budget value, particularly for everyday users who prioritize battery life, expandable storage and basic performance. Its lower asking price makes it easier to recommend for cost-conscious buyers, while Tecno provides stronger value for users who will actually use its additional hardware.
Verdict
Realme wins on affordability and value, while Tecno offers substantially more hardware for the premium.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
1. Conclusion
The Tecno Pova 8 Pro stands out with its AMOLED 144Hz display, rear Matrix display, Dimensity 7400 Ultimate chipset, OIS, ultrawide camera, IP68/IP69K protection, NFC, infrared port and bypass charging. These features give it a considerably more enthusiast-focused character. The Realme 16x 5G counters with a 7000mAh battery, microSD expansion, MIL-STD-810H compliance, drop resistance and a much lower price. It is clearly designed around practicality and affordability rather than maximum specifications.
Verdict
Tecno Pova 8 Pro is the better overall smartphone for buyers prioritizing performance, display quality, cameras and premium features. Realme 16x 5G is the better choice for budget-focused users who mainly want long battery life and everyday reliability. For buyers who can afford the difference, Tecno provides enough additional capability to make the upgrade worthwhile.
1. Which phone is better for gaming? The Tecno Pova 8 Pro is better for gaming thanks to its stronger chipset, higher RAM options and 144Hz AMOLED display.
2. Which phone takes better photos? The Tecno Pova 8 Pro offers better photography flexibility with OIS and an ultrawide camera.
3. Which phone lasts longer on one charge? The Realme 16x 5G has the larger battery, making it better suited to users prioritizing maximum battery endurance.
4. Which phone offers better value for money? The Realme 16x 5G offers stronger value for budget buyers because it costs substantially less while retaining 5G and 45W charging.
5. Which phone should you buy overall? Choose the Tecno Pova 8 Pro for a more powerful, feature-rich experience; choose Realme for lower cost and battery capacity.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
Portronics has expanded its lineup of consumer electronics in India with a new series of LCD writing pads aimed specifically at children. The new Ruffpad series includes three animal-themed models, the Dino 8.5, Teddy 8.5, and PupX 10, designed to give kids a reusable digital canvas for drawing, doodling, and handwriting practice without burning through reams of paper.
Specifications
All three models feature multicolor LCD screens that respond to an included stylus, creating rainbow-colored lines based on pressure. They are built with basic eye protection in mind, utilizing displays that emit no blue light.
Portronics has also included standard quality-of-life features for this hardware category: a one-tap erase button to quickly clear the screen, and a physical screen-lock toggle to prevent accidental deletions when a child is in the middle of a drawing.
The lineup is split by screen size and exterior design. The Ruffpad Dino 8.5 and Teddy 8.5 both feature 8.5-inch displays. The Dino model is housed in a green, dinosaur-shaped chassis and runs on a replaceable CR2016 coin-cell battery.
The Teddy variant adopts a bear-inspired design and steps up to a CR2025 battery. For users who need a bit more room to draw, the Ruffpad PupX 10 offers a larger 10-inch screen. It features a puppy-themed design complete with floppy-ear handles for easier carrying, and also runs on a CR2025 battery.
While the tablets themselves are offline, standalone devices, Portronics is bridging the gap to smartphones with the companion Ruffpad App. Available on iOS and Android, the app allows parents to scan, save, and share their kids’ notes or doodles before the physical screen is wiped clean.
The pricing is positioned firmly in the budget category, making them viable options for travel distractions or basic educational tools. The Ruffpad Dino 8.5 is available for Rs. 499 ($5.21), the Teddy 8.5 for Rs. 599 ($6.26), and the larger PupX 10 for Rs. 749.
All three models come with a 12-month warranty and are available now through the Portronics website, Amazon India, Flipkart, and various offline retail stores.
Realme 16x and Poco M8 Power take different approaches to the budget 5G segment. Realme focuses on durability, a fast 144Hz display and gaming-friendly features, while Poco pushes a larger battery, AMOLED screen and richer hardware. Here’s how the two compare on display, performance, cameras, battery and value.
Major Features:
Category
Realme 16x
Poco M8 Power
Winner
Display
6.81-inch 144Hz IPS LCD, 1200 nits
6.99-inch 120Hz AMOLED, 1800 nits
Poco — AMOLED and sharper resolution
Build
IP65, MIL-STD-810H, drop resistance
IP65
Realme — stronger durability features
Performance
Dimensity 6300, up to 6GB RAM
Snapdragon 4 Gen 4, up to 8GB RAM
Poco — better chipset and RAM options
Storage
Up to 256GB, shared microSD slot
Up to 128GB, dedicated microSD slot
Realme — higher maximum storage
Rear Camera
50MP AF, 1080p up to 60fps
50MP PDAF, 1080p 30fps
Realme — better video capability
Selfie Camera
8MP, 1080p 30fps
8MP, 1080p 30fps
Tie — similar specifications
Speakers
Single loudspeaker
Stereo speakers
Poco — better multimedia audio
Battery
7000mAh
8000mAh
Poco — larger capacity
Charging
45W, 7W reverse, bypass charging
45W, 22.5W reverse
Poco — stronger reverse charging
Connectivity
Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.3, no NFC
Wi-Fi 6, NFC, IR blaster
Poco — broader connectivity
Software Support
Android 16, up to 2 major updates
Android 16, up to 4 major updates
Poco — longer software support
Price / Value
Priced around $300 / ₹26,000
Priced around $250 / ₹25,000
Poco — more features for less
Overall
Rugged design and 144Hz display
AMOLED, bigger battery and richer features
Poco — stronger all-round package
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
The Realme 16x combines a glass front with a plastic frame and back, plus IP65 protection, MIL-STD-810H compliance, drop resistance and an RGB notification light. The Poco M8 Power also carries IP65 protection and adds stereo speakers with an under-display fingerprint sensor. Realme feels more rugged and practical, while Poco has a more premium multimedia-oriented character.
Display Quality
The Realme 16x uses an IPS LCD with a 144Hz refresh rate and up to 1200 nits HBM brightness. Poco takes a significant step ahead with an AMOLED panel, 120Hz refresh rate, 1080p resolution, Gorilla Glass 7i and up to 1800 nits peak brightness. Realme’s higher refresh rate helps scrolling, but Poco’s AMOLED panel delivers deeper blacks, stronger contrast and sharper visuals.
Poco wins the display category with its AMOLED technology, higher resolution, stronger brightness and Gorilla Glass 7i. Realme’s 144Hz panel is smooth, but Poco feels considerably more premium for entertainment and everyday viewing.
2. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Realme 16x uses the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 with up to 6GB RAM, while the Poco M8 Power uses the Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 with up to 8GB RAM. Both offer UFS 2.2 storage, but Poco has a dedicated microSD slot. The Snapdragon platform and additional RAM make Poco better suited to multitasking and sustained everyday use.
Battery and Charging
Realme packs a 7000mAh battery with 45W wired charging, 7W reverse wired charging and bypass charging. Poco goes further with an 8000mAh battery, 45W charging and 22.5W reverse wired charging. Charging speeds are identical, but Poco’s larger battery and stronger reverse charging make it more attractive for heavy users who prioritize endurance.
Poco wins on overall specifications with more RAM, a larger battery, stronger reverse charging and dedicated storage expansion. Realme’s bypass charging is useful for gaming, but Poco offers the broader hardware package.
3. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Both smartphones feature 50MP primary rear cameras with autofocus, but Poco specifies a 26mm equivalent lens, a 1/2.76-inch sensor and PDAF. Realme supports 1080p recording at up to 60fps, giving it an advantage for video flexibility. Poco is limited to 1080p at 30fps, although its PDAF system should help with focusing during everyday photography.
Selfie Camera
Both phones use an 8MP f/2.0 front camera capable of 1080p video at 30fps. Neither offers a higher-resolution selfie sensor or additional front-facing lens. For video calls, basic portraits and social-media selfies, the two should provide broadly similar capabilities, with neither establishing a major hardware advantage.
Verdict
Realme wins narrowly because its main camera supports 1080p recording at 60fps. Poco offers PDAF and more detailed sensor specifications, but Realme provides greater video flexibility.
4. Pricing
The Realme 16x is priced around $300, or approximately ₹26,000, while the Poco M8 Power is priced around $250, or approximately ₹25,000. Poco therefore undercuts Realme on price while offering a larger battery, an AMOLED display, more RAM, and several additional hardware features.
Realme’s higher price can be justified by its 144Hz refresh rate, ruggedness features, bypass charging and 60fps rear video recording. However, Poco offers considerably more display technology and battery capacity while also adding stereo speakers, NFC and an infrared port. Its hardware package feels stronger for buyers prioritizing features per rupee.
Verdict
Poco offers better value for money because its lower stated price comes with an AMOLED display, larger battery, more RAM, stereo speakers and broader connectivity. Realme makes more sense for buyers prioritizing ruggedness and bypass charging.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
5. Conclusion
The Realme 16x differentiates itself with a 144Hz display, MIL-STD-810H compliance, drop resistance, RGB notification light, bypass charging and 60fps rear video recording. The Poco M8 Power counters with AMOLED technology, Gorilla Glass 7i, stereo speakers, NFC, an IR port, dedicated microSD expansion and substantially stronger reverse charging.
Verdict
Poco M8 Power is the stronger overall choice for most buyers, combining a better display, larger battery, more RAM and richer features at a lower stated price. Realme 16x remains appealing for ruggedness, 144Hz smoothness and bypass charging.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
FAQs
1. Which phone is better for gaming, Realme 16x or Poco M8 Power? Poco M8 Power is better for gaming, thanks to its Snapdragon chipset, higher RAM options and larger battery.
2. Does Realme 16x take better photos than Poco M8 Power? Realme 16x has an advantage for video recording, supporting 1080p at 60fps compared with Poco’s 30fps limit.
3. Which phone has better battery life? Poco M8 Power should last longer between charges because its 8000mAh battery exceeds Realme 16x’s 7000mAh capacity.
4. Which phone offers better value for money? Poco M8 Power offers stronger overall value with its AMOLED display, larger battery, stereo speakers and higher RAM options.
5. Should you buy Realme 16x or Poco M8 Power? Choose Poco M8 Power for overall hardware value; Realme 16x suits buyers prioritizing durability and bypass charging.
HMD has launched the Nokia 300 Charge feature phone globally. There’s nothing fancy about it. No smart assistant, no big camera, no touchscreen tricks. What you get instead is a phone built to last as long as possible.
The Nokia 300 Charge packs a 3,700mAh battery, a huge number for a feature phone, with a USB-C port for charging. HMD says the device offers up to 40 days of standby time and 37 hours of continuous talk time.
There’s a neat trick tied to that big battery, too. The phone has a dedicated “Out” button on the side. Press it, and the Nokia 300 Charge switches on 10W reverse charging, so you can top up other compatible devices.
It’s a similar idea to what HMD tried with the Nokia 123 Shield, another rugged, no-frills phone HMD launched with a focus on battery life over features.
On the spec sheet, the Nokia 300 Charge measures 136.6 x 55 x 14.94mm and weighs 138g. It has a 2.4-inch LCD screen running at 320 x 240 resolution, a Unisoc SC6531E chip, and the S30+ operating system, the same chip and software combo found on the Nokia 123 Shield. Meanwhile, RAM and storage sit at just 4MB each.
As for connectivity, the phone only supports 900MHz and 1800MHz bands on 2G networks. That puts it in the same bracket as older Nokia feature phones, though HMD has been steadily adding USB-C ports across the lineup, following the shift it made with the Nokia 6310, 5310, and 230 a couple of years back.
HMD is selling the Nokia 300 Charge in three colors: sandstone, green, and black. Pricing is set at 2,190 Philippine pesos, which works out to roughly $38.
There’s no word yet on when the phone will reach markets beyond the Philippines, but the company already lists the device on its global site, so the wait shouldn’t be long.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
