Back in May, Honor unveiled the Honor Play 11 Plus in China, and now it has taken off covers from the Play 11 Pro. It has been quietly listed the Play 11 Pro on its online store in China, revealing the phone’s complete specifications, pricing, and availability. Here’s everything you need to know about this new Play-series phone.
Honor Play 11 Pro specifications and features
Honor Play 11 Pro
The Honor Play 11 Pro features a 6.6-inch 1.5K OLED flat display with a 120Hz refresh rate, a peak brightness of 6,500 nits, a 95 percent screen-to-body ratio, and 3840Hz PWM dimming for improved eye comfort. The phone is equipped with a Dimensity 6500 processor, paired with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage, although it does not support microSD card expansion.
The phone packs a 7,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging while maintaining a slim 7.34mm profile and a weight of 185g. Honor says the battery is designed to retain at least 80 percent of its original capacity after 1,000 charging cycles, translating to around six years of long-term durability. It ships with MagicOS 10-based Android 16.
Honor Play 11 Pro
The camera setup includes an 8-megapixel front camera and a 50-megapixel primary rear camera, while the handset also features an integrated metal frame, IP66 dust and water resistance, and SGS five-star drop resistance certification. Based on its specifications and design, the Honor Play 11 Pro appears to be a rebranded version of the existing Honor X80i.
Honor Play 11 Pro price and availability
The Honor Play 11 Pro is currently available for reservation in China in a single 8GB + 256GB configuration priced at 2,099 Yuan (~$310). It is offered in Moon Silver, Sunrise Gold, and Midnight Black, although the online listing initially shows only the Midnight Black variant for reservations.
For more daily updates, please visit ourNews Section.
Hisense has introduced the N24 (2027 Edition) monitor in China, expanding its lineup of affordable desktop displays. The new monitor is currently available for 499 yuan ($74). It is positioned as a dual-purpose display for standard daily productivity and PC gaming.
Hisense N24 2027 Specifications
The monitor features a 23.8-inch IPS panel with a 1920 x 1080 resolution, a 16:9 aspect ratio, and a 180Hz refresh rate for smoother motion. It also offers wide 178-degree viewing angles, ensuring consistent image quality from different viewing positions.
In terms of image quality, the N24 features an ELED backlight system that outputs a typical brightness of 300 nits alongside a 1500:1 contrast ratio. According to Hisense, the display covers 99% of the sRGB color space and 90% of the DCI-P3 color space. It supports 16.7 million colors, making it capable of handling standard media consumption and basic content creation tasks.
For gaming, the monitor includes AMD FreeSync support, which synchronizes the display’s refresh rate with the graphics card to prevent screen tearing and stuttering. The on-screen display menu also includes specific gaming adjustments, such as variable response times and dark scene enhancement to improve visibility in darker areas of a game.
To address eye strain during prolonged use, Hisense implemented DC dimming and hardware-level low blue light technology. This approach reduces blue light emissions at the hardware level, avoiding the yellow tint that software-based filters typically apply. The monitor carries TÜV Rheinland certifications for both Low Blue Light and Flicker-Free operation.
Physical connectivity is basic, featuring one HDMI port and one VGA port to support both newer and legacy computers. The monitor includes a tool-less quick-release stand that allows for tilt adjustments between -5° and 20°. For users who prefer custom setups, it is compatible with 100 x 100mm VESA mounts.
In related news, TCL has recently launched two new Tandem WOLED gaming monitors featuring up to 4K resolution, a 240Hz refresh rate, and Bang & Olufsen-tuned speakers, alongside an affordable 360Hz gaming monitor equipped with a 1440p Mini LED panel.
For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.
Oppo has shared another teaser for the upcoming A7 Pro Max, revealing more details about its camera hardware ahead of its official debut in China. The latest announcement focuses on the phone’s imaging capabilities while also giving a closer look at its design and official camera samples.
Oppo A7 Pro Max brings the A series’ most advanced camera setup
Oppo A7 Pro Max camera specs
According to Oppo, the A7 Pro Max will feature what it calls the most advanced imaging system in the history of the A series. The smartphone comes with 50-megapixel front and rear cameras, making it one of the few devices in its segment to offer high-resolution sensors on both sides.
The front camera also supports a 100-degree ultra-wide field of view, allowing more people to fit into group selfies. At the back, the phone includes a 50-megapixel primary camera with optical image stabilization, a 2-megapixel monochrome sensor, and a new intelligent flash system designed to improve portraits and low-light photography. Oppo has also published official camera samples that highlight the phone’s daylight and portrait performance.
Oppo A7 Pro Max camera samples
The company has already confirmed several other specifications ahead of launch. The Oppo A7 Pro Max will feature a 6.78-inch 1.5K OLED flat display with a 120Hz refresh rate and will be powered by the Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 processor.
It also becomes Oppo’s first smartphone with a 10,000mAh battery, paired with 80W fast charging. The handset runs ColorOS 16 and has passed Oppo’s 72-month ageing smoothness test, with software optimisations that reduce memory usage during startup and everyday operation.
Oppo has confirmed that the A7 Pro Max will be unveiled in China on August 4 at 2:30 PM local time. The smartphone will be offered in three colour options, including Wind Rider, Orange and Black. It will be available in 8GB+128GB, 12GB+256GB, and 12GB 512GB storage variants. The company has also teased the phone surviving direct exposure to 2,000°C rocket exhaust.
For more daily updates, please visit ourNews Section.
The watch industry in 2026 continues to draw heavily from the past, but you don’t need to spend a fortune to find a well-designed, retro-inspired piece. Recently, two of the most recognizable names in accessible watches, Casio and Timex, released their own distinct takes on the everyday vintage watch.
The Casio A140WE offers a refined update to the classic digital formula, while the END. x Timex 1981 Reissue leans into the analog traditions of mid-century sportswear. Both are solid options for everyday wear, but they take entirely different paths to get there.
Casio has a long history of producing reliable, affordable digital watches, and the new A140WE series (released in June 2026) builds on that foundation with a focus on slightly more premium materials and finishes. Priced at $110 (or $130 for the gold-tone A140WEG-9A), it sits comfortably in the accessible price bracket while offering a noticeable step up in design from the brand’s entry-level resin models.
The biggest design update comes in the case shape. Measuring 39mm by 36.8mm, the A140WE takes the traditional squared-off Casio silhouette and softens the edges. The rounded curves of the chrome-plated resin case make it a bit more versatile, allowing it to blend in easily with everyday clothing rather than looking purely utilitarian.
Casio also updated the dial by placing a sunray finish, available in navy, gray, or light gold, behind the digital LCD. It is a subtle detail, but the way the metallic texture catches the light adds a layer of depth that you don’t typically see on standard digital watches.
The watch is paired with a multi-row stainless steel bracelet featuring a vertical hairline finish, which gives it a clean, cohesive look. Functionally, it offers exactly what you expect from Casio: a stopwatch, daily alarm, auto-calendar, an electro-luminescent backlight, and a very practical seven-year battery life.
2. END. x Timex 1981 Reissue
On the other side of the spectrum is the END. x Timex 1981 Reissue. Priced at $199, this collaboration with the retailer END. moves away from digital utility and focuses instead on the analog aesthetics of classic tennis culture.
The design is centered around a 35mm brushed stainless-steel case. While 35mm might sound small by the standards of the last decade, it aligns well with the current trend of returning to more traditional, compact watch sizes. The smaller footprint makes it unobtrusive on the wrist and comfortable for daily wear.
The watch features a softly octagonal bezel that frames an ice-blue sunray dial. If you look closely, the dial includes a subtle globe etching, alongside applied markers and a standard date window at the 3 o’clock position.
It is a quiet design that doesn’t draw too much attention to itself, fitting the understated aesthetic often associated with tennis apparel. The watch runs on a standard quartz movement and is rated for 50 meters of water resistance, allowing it to handle light swimming while offering a practical advantage over the Casio’s more limited splash resistance.
3. Which One Makes Sense for You?
Choosing between these two watches largely comes down to whether you prefer a digital or analog display, and what kind of design language fits your daily routine.
If you appreciate the straightforward utility of a digital watch but want something that looks a bit more polished than a standard resin Casio, the A140WE is a very practical choice. At $110, it provides a reliable feature set, a long-lasting battery, and a design that feels like a natural evolution of Casio’s classic models.
Alternatively, if you prefer analog watches and like the idea of a smaller, vintage-proportioned case, the END. x Timex 1981 Reissue is a strong contender. The $199 price tag gets you a versatile stainless-steel watch with a well-executed dial design that pairs easily with casual or slightly dressed-up outfits.
Casio has unveiled two new additions to its Standard Collection in Japan, the MTP-1440DJ-1A and MTP-1440DJ-7B. Both analog watches are set to launch later this month and will retail for ¥7,700 (around $49).
Design Details
Both watches use the same case and bracelet design, with the main difference being the dial. The MTP-1440DJ-1A features a black dial with baton-style markers for a cleaner look, while the MTP-1440DJ-7B uses a white dial with large Arabic numerals for improved readability and a more casual appearance.
The watches feature a compact 41 x 36.3 x 8.6 mm case and weigh 92 grams, keeping them relatively lightweight despite their metal bracelet construction. Casio pairs the stainless steel bracelet with a one-touch triple-fold clasp, while the watch case is made from brass and finished with a silver ion-plated coating.
The dial is protected by standard mineral glass. These are standard material compromises at this price tier, keeping manufacturing costs down while maintaining a classic metallic look.
Functionally, both models are simple three-hand analog quartz watches. They feature a dual day and date window located at the 3 o’clock position. The watches are rated for 5 ATM (50 meters) of water resistance, which is sufficient to survive splashes, rain, and brief immersion in water, though they are not intended for swimming.
Internally, the quartz movement runs on a standard battery with an expected lifespan of approximately three years. Both models are currently available for pre-order through Casio’s online store ahead of their official rollout later this month.
New leaks about the Galaxy S26 FE’s camera system have started circulating, giving us an early look at what the next FE model might offer.
Android Authority reports that the Galaxy S26 FE (internal codename “r14”) follows the same naming pattern as the S24 FE (r12) and S25 FE (r13). The main camera is expected to use a 50MP Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3 sensor, the same one found in the S25 FE and S24 FE.
It’s a 1/1.57-inch sensor with 1µm pixels. It has an f/1.8 aperture, a 24mm-equivalent focal length, dual-pixel phase detection autofocus, and optical image stabilization.
The telephoto side relies on an 8MP OmniVision OV08A1 sensor that delivers 3x optical zoom, an f/2.4 aperture, PDAF, and OIS.
Two more 12MP sensors round out the package: a Galaxy Core GC12A2 and a Sony IMX825. It’s not 100% confirmed which one is the ultra-wide and which is the front camera, but looking at recent Samsung phones, the IMX825 (used as the selfie camera on the S25 FE) is the more likely front sensor, while the GC12A2 (previously seen on the Galaxy A37) would handle the ultra-wide. All the cameras support 4K video at 60fps, and the main sensor also adds 8K recording at 30fps.
Beyond the cameras, other rumored specs paint the S26 FE as a solid mid-to-upper-tier option for Galaxy fans. It’s expected to run Samsung’s Exynos 2500 chipset on a 3nm process, pack a 4,900mAh battery with 45W wired charging, and feature a 6.7-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a 120Hz refresh rate.
On pricing and timing, Dealabs points to a possible official reveal around September 1. In Europe, the 128GB model is tipped to start at €799, about €50 more than the previous version. Higher storage options are expected to carry modest bumps as well.
Overall, the leaks suggest Samsung is sticking with proven hardware and refining the performance rather than overhauling the camera system for the S26 FE. The dual-stabilized main and telephoto combo, solid video options, and updated internals should appeal to fans who want flagship-adjacent features without the full flagship price.
Citizen has released two new additions to its Peyten watch lineup in the UK. The new models, the EM1230-54X and the EM1234-53L, are straightforward analog watches that focus on a smaller 30mm form factor and the company’s long-running Eco-Drive power system.
Design Details
In a wearable market currently dominated by smartwatches that require daily charging, Citizen’s Eco-Drive technology offers a different kind of convenience. Instead of a lithium-ion battery that needs to be plugged into a wall, or a standard quartz watch battery that requires a replacement every few years, Eco-Drive uses a specialized solar panel integrated beneath the dial.
This panel absorbs both natural sunlight and artificial indoor light, converting it into energy that is stored in a rechargeable cell. The result is a watch that effectively powers itself in the background as long as it gets regular light exposure.
Both of the new Peyten models share this underlying technology and the exact same 30mm case size, which is quite compact compared to the larger cases often found on modern tech wearables. The differences between the two models come down entirely to materials, dial color, and price.
The EM1230-54X is priced at £249.00. It features a standard silver-tone stainless steel case and a matching link bracelet. The dial is purple, fitted with basic applied markers and a standard three-hand movement, all protected by a mineral crystal.
The second model, the EM1234-53L, costs slightly more at £269.00. For the extra £20, the case and bracelet are swapped to a two-tone stainless steel finish. This version also changes the dial from purple to blue, but otherwise maintains the exact same layout and internal hardware as the silver-tone model.
Both watches secure to the wrist using a fold-over clasp with push buttons. They also share a water resistance rating of 50 meters. This means they can handle basic water exposure and surface swimming, though they aren’t built for diving or high-pressure water sports.
The world’s largest memory maker now thinks the current shortage of DRAM and NAND is going to get worse next year and stick around until at least 2028. Samsung shared the outlook during its second-quarter FY2026 earnings call. It’s another clear sign of just how much artificial intelligence is rewriting the rules in the semiconductor world.
On the call, Samsung executives said several AI labs have already given them medium and long-term demand forecasts so the company can lock in capacity. That visibility is letting Samsung sign multi-year supply deals with big data-centre operators and expand production lines ahead of time. The idea is to smooth out the classic boom-and-bust cycles that have always defined the memory business.
The AI boom has been a mixed bag for Samsung. Its semiconductor division posted record sales and profits in the second quarter, with memory doing most of the heavy lifting. At the same time, the jump in component costs is starting to pinch the company’s own consumer electronics side. Higher memory prices have squeezed margins on Galaxy phones and TVs, so Samsung has raised retail prices. That’s already led to softer demand in those product lines.
Other device makers are feeling the same squeeze. Apple recently hiked prices on several MacBook and iPad models. Nothing had to cancel the CMF Phone 3 Pro and launch it under the Nothing brand to justify the price.
Samsung’s forecast makes it clear this tightness isn’t going away soon. Building new fab capacity takes years, and the fast growth of agentic AI is expected to keep pushing up token consumption, and with it, memory demand. By locking in long-term contracts for a big chunk of its output, Samsung is trying to make its own planning more predictable and bring a bit more stability to the wider market.
Keychron has introduced a new gaming mouse to the Chinese market called the G3 Air. It is priced at 599 yuan ($88) and is now available on JD.com.
Keychron G3 Air Specifications
The G3 Air weighs 43 grams. Instead of using a honeycomb shell with visible holes to reduce weight, Keychron opted for a solid shell made from a composite material containing 30% carbon fiber. The company says this allows the exterior plastic to be just 0.65mm thick while maintaining enough structural strength to prevent creaking or flexing during use. The internal frame also uses a cross-brace design for added rigidity.
In terms of dimensions, the mouse measures 120 x 63 x 38.3mm, which is generally suited for users with small to medium-sized hands. It has a symmetrical shape with a narrower middle section and a wider back, a standard design meant to work with palm, claw, or fingertip grip styles. The exterior has a matte, textured finish for better grip, and the bottom features standard 100% PTFE feet to help it glide smoothly across a mousepad.
Inside, the G3 Air is equipped with a PixArt PAW3950 optical sensor and a Nordic 54L15 controller. The sensor goes up to 30,000 DPI, handles tracking speeds of 750 IPS, and supports 50G acceleration. You can also adjust the lift-off distance between three different settings. For the main left and right clicks, Keychron is using TTC Falcon micro switches, which are rated for a lifespan of 80 million clicks.
For connectivity, the mouse supports both a wired connection and 2.4GHz wireless. Both modes support an 8,000Hz polling rate. To support this, Keychron includes a dedicated 8K wireless receiver that features a small, built-in color display. This screen shows practical, real-time information like the current DPI, polling rate, and the remaining capacity of the mouse’s 200mAh battery.
The G3 Air is available in black and white color options. You can customize the sensor settings, polling rates, and button layouts through Keychron’s desktop software.
One of the biggest promises Samsung made around the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series is actually its folding mechanism, or more specifically, the titanium support structure behind the display panel.
It’s called “Flex Titanium”, and from Samsung’s press materials, it looks like a series of slim titanium bars placed around the crease area to provide additional support as the display is folded and unfolded. The goal is to reduce the visibility of the crease and protect the display as it’s folded and unfolded over a long period of time.
When the phone was first showcased around a week ago, we could see that the crease was almost invisible. That was pretty impressive because the Galaxy Z Fold 7 still had a noticeable crease, while some Chinese foldables like the Oppo Find N6 from earlier this year had already managed to make the crease far less visible.
Ice Universe posted a tweet on July 23, the day after the Galaxy Unpacked event, comparing the crease of four devices: Galaxy Z Fold 7, Z Fold 8, Oppo Find N6, and the Vivo X Fold 6.
The crease on the Z Fold 8 looked the flattest. The Oppo Find N6, sitting right next to the Fold 8, still had a quite visible crease. It appeared that Samsung has finally fixed the problem, and Galaxy Foldables will be the best in this aspect until the next release.
A week later:
The Z Fold 8 series is set to go on sale on August 7 and is currently only in the hands of creators. One of them recently shared two short videos on X comparing brand-new Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra units with the review devices they’ve been using for the past week. The difference in crease visibility is immediately noticeable on both the standard and Ultra models.
The Oppo Find N6 maintained its crease much better after about a week of use. It will be interesting to see how Samsung’s new Flex Titanium technology holds up over the next year before the company unveils its successor.
Obsbot has released the Meet Flip, a $119 compact 4K webcam that relies on a folding mechanism rather than a standard plastic shutter for privacy. After an initial launch in China last month, the camera is now available globally through Obsbot’s website, Amazon, and select retailers.
Obsbot Meet Flip Specifications
The Meet Flip features a folding mechanism. Instead of relying on a sliding plastic shutter or a software-based mute button, the camera lens folds downward into the base. This physical action covers the lens and automatically places the device into sleep mode.
Opening the device wakes it up. The unit weighs 37.7 grams and includes a built-in unibody clip for attaching to laptop screens and external monitors. It also features a standard 1/4-inch thread on the bottom for tripod mounting.
Inside, the Meet Flip uses a 1/2-inch CMOS sensor with an f/1.8 aperture. It shoots in 4K at 30 frames per second or 1080p at 60 frames per second. Obsbot has included phase-detection autofocus (PDAF), which should help the camera lock onto subjects quickly without the focus-hunting effect common in standard webcams. It also supports HDR to balance out tricky lighting, such as sitting in front of a bright window.
For audio, the webcam features a dual-microphone setup with one directional and one omnidirectional mic. It offers four audio modes: directional for voice isolation, dual-directional for two-person conversations, omnidirectional for group settings, and raw stereo output for post-production editing.
Like most modern peripherals, it comes with a suite of software features via the Obsbot Center app. This includes standard auto-framing to keep you in the center of the shot and gesture controls for zooming or tracking. Obsbot is also pushing an AI Magic Notes feature that handles meeting transcripts and summaries across platforms like Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet. However, this is a subscription service; the camera only comes with 120 free minutes to start.
The Meet Flip connects via USB-C and supports integrations with the Elgato Stream Deck and OSC/API protocols. Obsbot says it is plug-and-play compatible with the Nintendo Switch 2 for direct gameplay recording and streaming.
After years of sitting on the sidelines of the high-end wearable market, the company that once helped shape the category looks like it’s gearing up for a comeback. Fresh renders shared by The Mac Observer on July 31 show a device internally called the Moto Watch Ultra, and it’s clearly being positioned as a potential rival to Samsung’s Galaxy Watch Ultra 2.
Motorola’s smartwatch story started more than a decade ago. In September 2014 the original Moto 360 showed up as one of the first widely available Android Wear watches. Its clean circular design got a lot of love and helped make the round smartwatch form factor popular at a time when most rivals were still stuck with square or rectangular faces. More models followed, but as Apple, Samsung, and Google doubled down on premium wearables, Motorola slowly drifted away from the flagship end of the market.
These new leaked images suggest that quieter period might be coming to an end. The Moto Watch Ultra is shown with a solid 46 mm stainless steel case, a circular display framed by a bezel with digital indices, a big rotating crown, and an extra physical side button.
Markings on the back hint at some serious flagship features. It appears to have built-in GPS and LTE, plus IP68 dust and water resistance and a 5 ATM rating (good for up to 50 metres). A large optical sensor array takes up a good chunk of the rear cover, pointing to solid health and fitness tracking. There’s also a four-pin magnetic charging port, which suggests Motorola will go with its own proprietary dock instead of regular wireless charging.
No official specs, software details, battery life numbers, pricing, or launch date have been confirmed yet. Still, the hardware cues make it pretty clear the company wants this one to play at the top of the market rather than just fill a mid-range slot.
If the finished product lives up to the ambition in these early images, Motorola could once again become a real contender in the flagship smartwatch space it helped kick off more than ten years ago.
The Dimensity 9600 is expected to be unveiled in September and is poised to be one of the most significant upgrades in recent years. One of the biggest highlights will be the move to a 2nm node, which alone brings a major boost to performance and efficiency. Plus, a radical new CPU structure would strongly challenge Apple’s historical lead in single-core dominance.
The official debut is still at least a month away, but there have been extensive leaks about Dimensity 9600. So, we already know how big an upgrade this could be over last year’s Dimensity 9500.
Dimensity 9600 vs Dimensity 9500: The upgrades look promising
Note: A recent leak suggested MediaTek may not release the standard Dimensity 9600. It could be released as the Dimensity 9600 Pro, alongside the Dimensity 9600 Pro Max. Since we don’t have solid evidence yet, we’re still going with Dimensity 9600 for this article, but the leak is worth keeping in mind.
The move to a 2nm node
The Dimensity 9600 is almost certain to use TSMC’s latest and most advanced 2nm node. It won’t just be just a standard size reduction, but will mark a major architectural revolution in chip design in over a decade.
TSMC’s 2nm node switches to a completely new structure called GAA (Gate-All-Around), which offers near-perfect control over the flow of power and stops energy leakages that plague 3nm chips. The new node is expected to consume about 25–30% less power.
At the same power level, the Dimensity 9600 would consume much less power than its predecessor. This allows chips to offer higher peak performance, which is why the Dimensity 9600 is rumored to hit nearly 5.0 GHz in peak CPU speed.
Moving beyond the single super core limitation
The Dimensity 9500 and previous MediaTek chips have relied on a single super core for the heavy lifting and smaller cores for everything else. The upcoming Dimensity 9600 reportedly moves to a 2+3+3 design, featuring two super cores. This effectively doubles the chip’s capacity for burst tasks, such as launching heavy apps or processing instant computational photography.
The Dimensity 9600’s CPU cluster could look like:
2 x Cortex-X series super cores (codenamed “Canyon”)
3 x Cortex-A series performance cores (codenamed “Gelas-B”)
3 x Cortex-A series efficiency cores (codenamed “Gelas”)
The Dimensity 9600 Pro is rumored to hit 5.0 GHz in peak CPU speed, while the standard Dimensity 9600 is expected to get a lower-clocked version. However, both versions are expected to feature the same CPU layout.
The new GPU brings essential upgrades
The Dimensity 9600 is expected to offer ARM’s next-generation Immortalis GPU, codenamed “Magni,” with hardware-level frame interpolation, allowing the chip to insert frames at the silicon level rather than through software tricks. This means games running at 60 fps can target 120 fps with better visuals and lower latency than software-based frame interpolation.
Ray tracing capabilities have also reportedly been enhanced to deliver more realistic lighting and shadows, bringing them closer to PC-and console-level experiences.
Major NPU upgrades tag along
The Dimensity 9600 is said to bring major upgrades to NPU architecture, specifically designed to elevate agentic AI capabilities. This could be why OpenAI is rumored to use the same chip in its upcoming agent-focused smartphone.
According to leaks, the Dimensity 9600 will introduce a Dual-NPU design that splits tasks between a high-power NPU for heavy generation and a low-power NPU for always-on listening and context awareness. The new chip is also expected to introduce a Neural Shader Scheduler, which will intelligently decide whether a task is suited for NPU or the GPU, to reduce power draw.
The Dimensity 9600 is also said to add hardware support for Scalable Matrix Extension 2 (SME2), which is expected to significantly accelerate the matrix math used by large language models (LLMs) like Gemini Nano.
If you’re choosing between a premium flagship experience and a feature-packed mid-range contender, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE and Nothing Phone (4b) offer two very different approaches. One focuses on flagship performance, premium cameras, and long-term software support, while the other delivers excellent battery life and value at a lower price. Here’s how they compare across every important category.
Major Features:
Category
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Nothing Phone (4b)
Winner
Build Quality
Gorilla Glass Victus+, aluminum frame, IP68
Glass front, plastic frame/back, IP64
Samsung – Premium build & better durability
Display
6.7-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+
6.77-inch AMOLED, 120Hz
Samsung – LTPO & HDR10+ panel
Peak Brightness
1900 nits
2000 nits
Nothing – Higher peak brightness
Display Protection
Gorilla Glass Victus+
Dragontail Pro Glass
Samsung – Better protection
Processor
Exynos 2400
Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
Samsung – Flagship performance
GPU
Xclipse 940
Adreno 810
Samsung – More powerful graphics
Storage
UFS 4.0
UFS 2.2
Samsung – Much faster storage
RAM & Storage Options
Up to 512GB, 8GB RAM
Up to 256GB, 8GB RAM
Samsung – More storage choices
Software Support
7 Android upgrades
3 Android upgrades
Samsung – Outstanding longevity
Main Camera
50MP OIS
50MP OIS
Samsung – Better image processing
Telephoto Camera
8MP with 3x optical zoom
No
Samsung – Dedicated zoom lens
Ultrawide Camera
12MP
8MP
Samsung – Higher-quality ultrawide
Video Recording
Up to 8K HDR10+
Up to 4K
Samsung – Superior video capabilities
Selfie Camera
12MP, 4K60
16MP, 1080p
Samsung – Better selfie video
Battery
4900mAh
5200mAh Global / 6000mAh India
Nothing – Longer battery life
Wired Charging
45W
33W
Samsung – Faster charging
Wireless Charging
15W + Reverse Wireless
Not supported
Samsung – Wireless convenience
Connectivity
Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4, USB 3.2
Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 6.0, USB 2.0
Samsung – Faster overall connectivity
Extra Features
Samsung DeX, Wireless DeX, Qi2
Notification LED
Samsung – More productivity features
Price
Priced around $650 / ₹50,000
Priced around $420 / ₹35,000
Nothing – Better affordability
Overall Value
Premium flagship experience
Excellent mid-range value
Samsung – Better all-round smartphone
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE delivers a noticeably more premium experience with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both the front and back, an aluminum frame, and an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance. Samsung also adds its Enhanced Armor Aluminum frame, making the device feel more durable for long-term everyday use. The Nothing Phone (4b) follows a different approach with its signature transparent-inspired design, notification LED interface, and plastic frame and back. While it has a distinctive personality, its IP64 rating offers less protection against water and dust. Those looking for durability may naturally lean toward Samsung, while users who enjoy unconventional styling may appreciate Nothing’s unique identity.
Display Quality
Samsung equips the Galaxy S25 FE with a 6.7-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display supporting HDR10+, adaptive 120Hz refresh rate, and up to 1900 nits peak brightness. The LTPO panel also improves power efficiency by dynamically adjusting refresh rates. The Nothing Phone (4b) features a slightly larger 6.77-inch AMOLED display with a fixed 120Hz refresh rate, 480Hz PWM dimming, and up to 2000 nits peak brightness. Although Nothing reaches a higher peak brightness on paper, Samsung’s HDR support, LTPO technology, and overall display calibration create a more refined viewing experience for media consumption.
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE offers a stronger overall package thanks to its premium materials, superior protection, and more advanced display technology, while the Nothing Phone (4b) stands out mainly for its unique design language.
2. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Galaxy S25 FE is powered by Samsung’s Exynos 2400 chipset built on a 4nm process, paired with the Xclipse 940 GPU and fast UFS 4.0 storage. Combined with Android 16 and seven years of major OS upgrades, it delivers flagship-level multitasking, gaming performance, and excellent long-term software support. The Nothing Phone (4b) runs on the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 processor with Adreno 810 graphics and UFS 2.2 storage. It handles everyday tasks smoothly but is designed more for mid-range users than demanding gamers or heavy multitaskers. Samsung’s hardware simply leaves much more performance headroom for future apps and updates.
Battery and Charging
Samsung includes a 4900mAh battery with 45W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, Qi2 compatibility, and reverse wireless charging. Nothing counters with a larger 5200mAh international battery and an impressive 6000mAh Indian variant alongside 33W wired charging and reverse wired charging. Battery life is expected to favor Nothing, particularly in India, while Samsung compensates with faster charging versatility and wireless convenience.
Verdict
Nothing Phone (4b) excels in battery endurance, but the Galaxy S25 FE delivers a far more balanced experience through flagship performance, faster storage, wireless charging support, and industry-leading software longevity.
3. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Samsung equips the Galaxy S25 FE with a versatile triple-camera setup featuring a 50MP primary sensor with OIS, a dedicated 8MP telephoto lens offering 3x optical zoom, and a 12MP ultrawide camera. Video recording extends up to 8K with HDR10+ support, making it a capable device for both photography and videography. The Nothing Phone (4b) includes a 50MP primary camera with OIS and an 8MP ultrawide sensor but lacks a dedicated telephoto camera. It supports 4K video recording and delivers respectable results for everyday photography, though it cannot match Samsung’s flexibility. The additional zoom lens makes a meaningful difference for portraits and distant subjects.
Selfie Camera
Samsung’s 12MP front camera supports 4K recording at up to 60fps with HDR10+, producing detailed and smooth videos. Nothing offers a higher-resolution 16MP selfie camera, but video recording is limited to 1080p. For content creators and video calls, Samsung delivers a noticeably more premium front-camera experience.
Verdict
The Galaxy S25 FE clearly leads in camera versatility, zoom capabilities, video recording quality, and overall imaging performance. Nothing performs well for casual users but targets a different performance segment.
4. Pricing
The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is priced around $650 (₹50,000), placing it firmly in the premium smartphone category. At this price, buyers receive flagship-grade performance, premium materials, wireless charging, Samsung DeX, seven years of Android updates, and a highly capable camera system. The Nothing Phone (4b) is priced around $420 (₹35,000), making it significantly more affordable while still offering a smooth AMOLED display, large battery, clean Nothing OS experience, and respectable everyday performance. The price gap reflects the difference in overall hardware and long-term capabilities rather than branding alone.
Is the Price Justified? Is It Value for Money
Samsung’s pricing is justified for buyers seeking flagship features and long software support. Nothing provides stronger value for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life, clean software, and distinctive design over flagship performance.
Verdict
For maximum value under ₹35,000, the Nothing Phone (4b) is an excellent choice. For users willing to spend more, the Galaxy S25 FE delivers a noticeably richer feature set that justifies its premium pricing.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
5. Conclusion
Galaxy S25 FE distinguishes itself with Samsung DeX, Wireless DeX, Qi2-compatible wireless charging, reverse wireless charging, an LTPO AMOLED display, UFS 4.0 storage, flagship Exynos 2400 performance, IP68 durability, a dedicated telephoto camera, and an exceptional seven years of Android updates. These features make it well-suited for productivity, gaming, photography, and long-term ownership.
Nothing Phone (4b) counters with its signature Glyph-inspired notification LED system, clean Nothing OS 4.1 interface, impressive battery capacity, especially the 6000mAh Indian variant, and a competitive price that appeals to users looking for a fresh software experience without spending flagship money. Each phone targets a different audience rather than competing on identical priorities.
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is the stronger all-around smartphone thanks to its flagship-grade performance, premium build, superior cameras, advanced display, and unmatched software commitment. The Nothing Phone (4b) remains an excellent value-focused alternative with outstanding battery life and distinctive design, making it a smart choice for users who want a capable everyday smartphone at a considerably lower price.
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.
TV speakers still sound thin, even on sets with gorgeous picture quality. Physics is mostly to blame here — TVs keep getting slimmer, and there’s just not enough room inside for drivers big enough to fill a living room with sound. Some brands squeeze in decent audio on their priciest models, but you’re usually paying thousands of dollars just for that.
The cheaper fix is a soundbar, and we have two new contenders in this category. TCL has just announced the Q95K in China with 1420W peak output and 11.1.4-channel audio. Samsung, meanwhile, refreshed its home audio lineup for 2026 after the HW-Q990F won major awards throughout 2025.
TCL Q95KSamsung HW-Q990F
Both offer a full, room-filling home theater setup without stacking separate speakers around your living room. Here is how they compare.
TCL’s Q95K ships as a four-piece system. You get the main bar, a wireless subwoofer, and two wireless rear speakers. Inside, the company packs 22 physical drivers across 12 independent amplifier chips, which TCL says cuts down on crosstalk between channels. The subwoofer uses two opposing 7-inch drivers that are meant to reduce vibration when the bass gets heavy.
The Samsung HW-Q990F takes a similar four-piece approach: a main bar, a subwoofer, and two rear speakers. Samsung redesigned the subwoofer this year, making it smaller and about one pound lighter than the unit that shipped with the older HW-Q990D. The bar itself mixes aluminum with plastic, a change from the nearly all-metal build of last year’s model. Both companies clearly built these systems for wall mounting, and both use a dark, minimal look that avoids fabric mesh covers.
2. Channels, Power, and Audio Formats
The TCL Q95K is the loudest thing on paper, and it’s not even close. It runs an 11.1.4-channel setup with a peak output of 1,420 watts, and TCL says the system covers a frequency range of 30Hz to 20kHz while keeping distortion under 1 percent. TCL partnered with Bang & Olufsen on the tuning, and the pairing comes with a Beosonic app interface that lets you adjust sound profiles from your phone.
Samsung’s HW-Q990F also runs 11.1.4 channels, spread across 16 real speaker channels rather than TCL’s higher driver count. Samsung leans on its own software instead of an outside audio partner, with SpaceFit Sound Pro handling room calibration and an Active Voice Amplifier feature meant to keep dialogue clear at lower volumes.
Both bars support Dolby Atmos and DTS:X, so the format support lines up closely. Where they differ is in the extras: Samsung can also decode Dolby TrueHD and Dolby Digital Plus.
If you own a TV from the same brand as your soundbar, both systems reward you for it. TCL has a T-Chord feature that lets you sync the soundbar with the speakers built into compatible TCL TVs. Samsung’s version, Q-Symphony, does the same thing with recent Samsung TVs, and premium Samsung sets can even send Dolby Atmos audio to the Q990F wirelessly.
3. Connectivity and Gaming Features
For gamers, the TCL Q95K includes three HDMI 2.1 ports with 48Gbps bandwidth, and it passes through 4K video at up to 144Hz along with Variable Refresh Rate and Auto Low Latency Mode. Samsung’s HW-Q990F covers similar ground with two HDMI 2.1 inputs plus an HDMI eARC output, 4K passthrough at 120Hz, and its own VRR support.
For wireless streaming, TCL includes Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth, Apple AirPlay 2, and Spotify Connect. Samsung offers Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.0, AirPlay 2, and a longer list of streaming services that includes Tidal Connect, Amazon Music, and Deezer, plus Amazon Alexa voice control built in.
4. Price and Availability
This is where the two systems pull furthest apart. The TCL Q95K costs 6,999 yuan in China, which works out to roughly $1,034. TCL also sells two step-down models alongside it: the Q85K at around $886 and the Q75K at around $694. The catch, however, is availability. As of now, the Q95K has only launched in China, and TCL has not given a timeline for a US, UK, or other Western release.
The Samsung HW-Q990F, by contrast, is already sold worldwide and was tested at £1,699 / $1,999 / AU$1,999 at launch. That is close to double the price of the TCL Q95K’s Chinese sticker price, though prices for Samsung’s Q-series soundbars, including the older HW-Q990C, tend to drop over time as newer models arrive.
5. Which One Should You Choose?
Right now, this comparison comes with an asterisk. If you live outside China, you cannot buy the TCL Q95K yet, unless you decide to import. That leaves the Samsung HW-Q990F as the only one of the two you can actually order today, and fortunately, reviewers have consistently rated it as one of the best Dolby Atmos soundbars on the market.
If TCL does bring the Q95K to Western markets, the pitch will become more interesting. It offers more physical drivers, a higher peak wattage figure, and a Bang & Olufsen tuning partnership, all at a price well below Samsung’s flagship. That said, Samsung still has the edge in software maturity, format support, streaming service variety, and a long track record of holding the top spot in global soundbar sales.
For now, buyers outside China have one clear option in this matchup. Buyers inside China get a genuinely tempting alternative, and the rest of the world will just have to wait and see if TCL brings the Q95K home.
For more daily updates, please visit ourNews Section.
Choosing between the Redmi Note 17 Pro and the OnePlus Nord CE 6 isn’t as straightforward as their price tags suggest. One focuses on massive battery life and rugged durability, while the other delivers stronger performance, better cameras, and a smoother display. Here’s a detailed comparison to see which smartphone offers the better overall value for your money.
Major Features:
Category
Redmi Note 17 Pro
OnePlus Nord CE 6
Winner
Design & Durability
IP68/IP69, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, 3m drop resistance
IP68/IP69, MIL-STD-810H compliance
Redmi – Better screen protection and drop resistance
Display
6.83-inch AMOLED, 120Hz, 3,500 nits
6.78-inch AMOLED, 144Hz, HDR, 3,600 nits
OnePlus – Smoother refresh rate and HDR support
Processor
Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
OnePlus – Significantly faster chipset
GPU
Adreno
Adreno 810
OnePlus – Better graphics performance
RAM & Storage
Up to 12GB RAM, 512GB, UFS 3.1
Up to 8GB RAM, 256GB, UFS 3.1
Redmi – More RAM and storage options
Software
Android 16, HyperOS 3
Android 16
Redmi – More feature-rich software experience
Rear Camera
50MP + Auxiliary, 1080p video
50MP OIS + Auxiliary, 4K video
OnePlus – OIS and 4K recording
Selfie Camera
8MP
32MP with 4K video
OnePlus – Much better selfies and video
Battery
9,000mAh
8,000mAh (India)
Redmi – Outstanding battery capacity
Charging
67W wired
80W wired, PPS, bypass charging
OnePlus – Faster and more advanced charging
Audio
Stereo speakers
Stereo speakers
Tie – Similar experience
Connectivity
Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, NFC, IR Blaster
Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.2, aptX HD, LHDC 5
OnePlus – Better wireless connectivity
Build Features
Ultrasonic proximity, NFC, IR Blaster
NFC (region dependent), IR Blaster
Redmi – Better sensor implementation
Price / Value
Priced around $235 / ₹22,690
Priced around $330 / ₹30,000
Redmi – Better value for money
Overall Winner
OnePlus – Better overall performance, display, cameras, and charging despite the higher price
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
Both smartphones offer premium durability despite targeting the mid-range segment. The Redmi Note 17 Pro features IP68/IP69 certification, enhanced drop resistance, and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection, making it particularly appealing for users who prioritize ruggedness. The OnePlus Nord CE 6 also carries IP68/IP69 certification alongside MIL-STD-810H compliance, giving it a solid reputation for handling everyday wear. The Redmi feels more focused on long-term durability, while the OnePlus leans toward a refined everyday experience.
Display Quality
The Redmi Note 17 Pro sports a 6.83-inch AMOLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, 3,500 nits peak brightness, and support for 68 billion colors. The OnePlus Nord CE 6 counters with a slightly smaller 6.78-inch AMOLED display offering a faster 144Hz refresh rate, HDR support, one billion colors, and up to 3,600 nits peak brightness. While Redmi delivers vibrant visuals, the Nord CE 6 provides smoother animations and richer HDR content, making it feel more premium during gaming and media consumption.
Verdict
The Redmi Note 17 Pro excels in toughness and screen protection, but the OnePlus Nord CE 6 delivers the more complete display experience with its higher refresh rate, HDR support, and stronger multimedia appeal.
2. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
Performance is where the gap becomes noticeable. The Redmi Note 17 Pro runs on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset paired with up to 12GB RAM and UFS 3.1 storage on higher variants. It comfortably handles daily tasks, streaming, and casual gaming. The OnePlus Nord CE 6 uses the significantly more powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 processor with the newer Adreno 810 GPU, offering faster app launches, better multitasking, and stronger gaming performance. It is also better positioned for future Android updates and demanding applications.
Battery and Charging
Battery life is one of Redmi’s biggest strengths, thanks to its enormous 9,000mAh silicon-carbon battery with 67W fast charging and reverse charging support. The OnePlus Nord CE 6 offers an 8,000mAh battery in India (7,500mAh globally) with quicker 80W charging, bypass charging, and improved PPS support. Redmi lasts longer between charges, while OnePlus spends less time connected to the charger.
Verdict
Choose the Redmi Note 17 Pro for maximum endurance. Choose the OnePlus Nord CE 6 if faster performance and quicker charging matter more than absolute battery capacity.
3. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Both phones feature a 50MP primary camera, but their imaging capabilities differ considerably. The Redmi Note 17 Pro relies on PDAF without optical image stabilization and is limited to 1080p video recording. It captures decent daylight images suitable for social media and everyday photography, but struggles to match higher-end competitors. The OnePlus Nord CE 6 includes optical image stabilization, a color spectrum sensor, and supports 4K video recording with gyro-EIS. Videos appear steadier, and low-light photography benefits from the stabilized sensor, making the camera system noticeably more versatile.
Selfie Camera
The Redmi uses a basic 8MP front camera capable of recording 1080p video. The OnePlus Nord CE 6 offers a much sharper 32MP selfie camera with 4K recording and gyro-EIS, delivering significantly better selfies, video calls, and creator-focused content. Users who frequently use the front camera will appreciate the extra detail and improved stabilization.
Verdict
The OnePlus Nord CE 6 clearly leads in photography and videography. Better stabilization, superior video recording, and a higher-resolution selfie camera make it the stronger choice for content creators and photography enthusiasts.
4. Pricing
The Redmi Note 17 Pro is priced around $235 (₹22,690), making it one of the most affordable smartphones with a massive 9,000mAh battery and premium durability features. The OnePlus Nord CE 6 is priced around $330 (₹30,000), placing it in a higher price bracket while offering a more capable processor, superior cameras, a smoother display, and faster charging. The price difference is noticeable, but both devices target different priorities.
For buyers focused on battery life and overall affordability, the Redmi delivers excellent value without sacrificing everyday usability. The OnePlus Nord CE 6 asks for a higher investment but rewards users with stronger long-term performance, better multimedia capabilities, and a noticeably more capable camera system. The additional cost feels justified for users who want a more balanced smartphone experience rather than simply the biggest battery.
Verdict
The Redmi Note 17 Pro offers outstanding value for budget-conscious buyers, while the OnePlus Nord CE 6 justifies its premium with meaningful upgrades across performance, display, charging, and cameras.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
5. Conclusion
The Redmi Note 17 Pro stands out with its huge 9,000mAh silicon-carbon battery, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection, impressive durability, and aggressive pricing. It is designed for users who value extended battery life and dependable everyday performance above everything else. The OnePlus Nord CE 6 differentiates itself with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 chipset, 144Hz HDR AMOLED display, optical image stabilization, 4K recording on both front and rear cameras, faster 80W charging, and bypass charging. These additions create a more polished flagship-inspired experience.
Verdict
Redmi Note 17 Pro is the better choice for users seeking exceptional battery life and maximum value at a lower price. However, the OnePlus Nord CE 6 is the more complete smartphone overall. Its superior processor, better cameras, smoother display, faster charging, and enhanced multimedia features make it a stronger long-term investment for buyers willing to spend more.
Those prioritizing overall balance and performance will find the OnePlus Nord CE 6 easier to recommend, while battery-focused users will be highly satisfied with the Redmi Note 17 Pro.
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.
OnePlus has finally launched the N6x, which sits below the N6 from earlier this year. It retains many of the specifications of the N6 while costing a little less for the same configuration, which could make the trade-offs worthwhile for some people.
The OnePlus N6x is positioned as an absolute entry-level device with an IPS LCD display and a starting configuration of 4GB+64GB.
The good news is that it still uses the Dimensity 6360 Apex chipset, the same one found in the OnePlus N6. That means you shouldn’t notice any difference in raw performance. As for heat dissipation, the company claims it features the segment’s largest vapor chamber, with an area of 5,300 mm².
Just like the N6, the display has a 720p resolution. However, the typical and peak brightness numbers are a little lower: 700 nits typical, down from 975 on the N6, and 900 nits in HBM mode, down from 1,200. It still refreshes at 120 Hz, so lightweight tasks like scrolling through settings, social media, or the app drawer should feel smooth.
The battery capacity is about what you would expect in this price range in 2026. It’s 7,000 mAh, which is 1,000 mAh smaller than the OnePlus N6. The bigger compromise is charging speed. While the N6 supports 45 W wired charging, the N6x is limited to 15 W. If you’ve gotten used to fast charging and often rely on a quick 20–30% top-up before heading out, 15 W charging will take some getting used to.
Of course, OnePlus is highlighting the upside of the larger battery. The company claims up to 2.5 days of battery life on a single charge.
The camera setup is fairly simple: a 13MP main sensor paired with a 5MP selfie camera. For comparison, the N6 features a higher-resolution 50MP main camera and an 8MP selfie camera.
Price and availability:
The N6x comes in two color options: Burgundy Red and Ice Blue. It will go on sale in India on August 4, 2026.
It comes in two configurations: the 4GB + 64GB variant is priced at ₹18,999, while the 4GB + 128GB variant costs ₹20,999. For comparison, the 4GB + 128GB variant of the N6 is currently priced at ₹22,999 on Amazon.
Redmi Note 17 Pro and Nothing Phone (4a) target very different priorities despite competing in the same segment. Redmi focuses on unmatched battery life, rugged durability, and value, while Nothing aims to deliver a premium software experience, stronger performance, and a far more capable camera system. This comparison breaks down every major category to help determine which smartphone offers the better overall value for your needs.
Major Features:
Category
Redmi Note 17 Pro
Nothing Phone (4a)
Winner
Display
6.83-inch AMOLED, 120Hz, 3,500 nits, Gorilla Glass Victus 2
The Redmi Note 17 Pro focuses on durability with IP68/IP69K dust and water resistance, certified protection against high-pressure water, and impressive drop resistance. Gorilla Glass Victus 2 further strengthens the front, making it a practical option for users who prioritize longevity. The Nothing Phone (4a) follows a more premium-looking approach with a glass back, Gorilla Glass 7i protection, and the signature rear notification LED that gives it a distinctive identity. Its IP64 rating is suitable for everyday splashes but cannot match Redmi’s rugged protection. Those looking for a phone built to withstand demanding conditions may naturally lean toward Redmi, while Nothing feels more stylish and modern.
Display Quality
Both phones feature large AMOLED panels with a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling. Redmi delivers a brighter 3,500-nit peak display with 3,840Hz PWM dimming and Gorilla Glass Victus 2, making it excellent for outdoor use. Nothing counters with a 1-billion-color AMOLED panel, HDR10+, Ultra HDR support, and an even higher advertised 4,500-nit peak brightness for HDR content, producing richer visuals during supported playback. Both displays are sharp, but Nothing’s color accuracy and HDR capabilities create a more premium viewing experience.
Verdict
Redmi Note 17 Pro wins on durability and protection, while Nothing Phone (4a) offers the more refined multimedia display. Users focused on entertainment may appreciate Nothing more, whereas Redmi is the safer choice for long-term reliability.
2. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Redmi Note 17 Pro runs on the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 with Android 16 and HyperOS 3, delivering dependable performance for daily tasks, casual gaming, and multitasking. However, the Nothing Phone (4a) is powered by the newer Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 paired with the Adreno 810 GPU, offering noticeably stronger CPU and graphics performance. It also promises up to three major Android upgrades, adding long-term software value. Faster UFS 3.1 storage is available across most variants on both devices, although Redmi’s base model still uses UFS 2.2.
Battery and Charging
Battery capacity is where Redmi takes a commanding lead with its massive 9,000mAh silicon-carbon battery supported by 67W wired charging and 22.5W reverse wired charging. Nothing uses a 5,080mAh global battery or a 5,400mAh Indian variant with 50W fast charging and 7.5W reverse charging. Redmi easily lasts much longer between charges, making it ideal for heavy users and travelers.
Verdict
Nothing Phone (4a) is clearly the faster smartphone with better long-term software support, but Redmi Note 17 Pro dominates battery endurance by a significant margin. The better choice depends on whether performance or longevity matters more.
3. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Camera hardware separates these two phones dramatically. Redmi Note 17 Pro includes a basic 50MP primary camera with an auxiliary sensor that mainly supports depth information, making it suitable for everyday photography but limited in versatility. Nothing Phone (4a) features a far more capable triple-camera setup consisting of a 50MP primary sensor with OIS, a 50MP periscope telephoto camera offering 3.5x optical zoom, and an 8MP ultrawide camera. It also records 4K video with Dolby Vision HDR, gyro-EIS, and optical stabilization, providing much greater flexibility for photography and videography. The difference is noticeable even before considering zoom performance.
Selfie Camera
Nothing continues its advantage with a high-resolution 32MP front camera compared to Redmi’s 8MP shooter. Selfies capture more detail, while video quality also benefits from improved image processing. Redmi remains adequate for video calls but lacks the refinement expected in this price segment.
Verdict
Nothing Phone (4a) comfortably wins the camera comparison. Its versatile triple-camera system, stabilized video recording, telephoto zoom, and significantly better selfie camera make it a much stronger option for photography enthusiasts.
4. Pricing
The Redmi Note 17 Pro is priced around $235 (₹22,690), placing it firmly in the affordable mid-range category. At this price, buyers receive a premium AMOLED display, exceptional durability, and one of the largest batteries available in any mainstream smartphone. The Nothing Phone (4a) is priced around $450 (₹32,000), making it considerably more expensive. However, the higher price includes a faster Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 processor, a far superior triple-camera system with telephoto zoom, longer software support, and premium software optimization.
The Redmi clearly delivers stronger hardware value for users focused on battery life and ruggedness. Nothing, meanwhile, justifies much of its premium through photography, software experience, and overall performance. Spending more makes sense only if those upgrades are priorities rather than optional extras.
Verdict
For pure value, Redmi Note 17 Pro offers a stronger price-to-performance ratio. Nothing Phone (4a) earns its higher price through flagship-inspired features, but Redmi remains the smarter purchase for budget-conscious buyers.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
5. Conclusion
Redmi Note 17 Pro stands out with its enormous 9,000mAh silicon-carbon battery, IP68/IP69K durability, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, and rugged construction that few competitors can match. It is designed for users who value endurance and reliability over premium imaging. Nothing Phone (4a) takes a different approach by offering a cleaner Android experience with Nothing OS 4.1, guaranteed software upgrades, the signature Glyph-style notification lighting, and a versatile triple-camera system featuring a dedicated periscope zoom lens. Its stronger processor also provides better long-term performance for gaming and demanding applications.
Verdict
The Redmi Note 17 Pro is the better choice for users seeking maximum battery life, outstanding durability, and excellent overall value. The Nothing Phone (4a) is better suited to buyers who prioritize camera quality, software experience, and faster performance over battery capacity.
Overall, Redmi delivers the stronger value proposition, while Nothing provides the more complete premium smartphone experience for those willing to spend more.
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.
Nothing is preparing for a pretty big shift. According to a well-connected industry insider who spoke to Smartprix, the company is repositioning itself as an AI-first brand, with audio and wearable products taking center stage in the coming months.
Nothing Ear (3)
This isn’t going to be a sudden overnight change. It’s expected to roll out in stages. The first wave is reportedly lined up for September, right around the launch of Apple’s iPhone 18 Pro series. Co-founder Carl Pei sees AI-native devices as a real growth opportunity at a time when smartphone margins are getting tighter, and competition is fiercer than ever.
The first phase includes a smartwatch, headphones, earbuds, and speakers
In this first phase, Nothing is preparing launches under both its main brand and the more budget-friendly CMF line. The rumored lineup includes CMF Ear Clip Buds, Nothing Headphones (Gen 2), a Nothing Smartwatch, and CMF Speakers. The speakers would be a brand-new category for them. All of these are expected to keep the transparent-inspired look and distinctive design style that made Nothing stand out in the first place.
Branching into AI-powered audio and wearables could allow Nothing to spread its bets while still leaning on the design identity that first got people talking about its phones. The source suggests these new products will go beyond basic features and include some smarter capabilities, though the exact software details haven’t been shared yet.
Launching in the August–September window would let Nothing show off its new direction before the big autumn product rush. Roadmaps can always change, of course, but this particular insider has a solid track record, which gives the claims some weight. If it plays out as described, the next few months could mark the start of a broader evolution for the company, one where phones stay in the mix, but AI-focused accessories and wearables get a much bigger push.
Nothing has already built a loyal following with its accessible design and community-first approach. Taking that same energy into new categories under an AI-first strategy could help the brand navigate the tough smartphone market while opening up some fresh growth paths. We’ll probably hear more official details as the expected launch window gets closer.
Redmi Note 17 Pro and iQOO Z11 take two very different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. One focuses on unmatched battery life and rugged durability, while the other delivers stronger performance, faster charging, and a more capable camera system. If you’re deciding between these two Android smartphones, this comparison breaks down every major difference to help you find the better fit for your budget and daily needs.
The Redmi Note 17 Pro focuses on durability with IP68/IP69K certification, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection, impressive drop resistance, and manufacturer-rated extended water resistance. It feels like a phone designed for users who prioritize reliability and long-term toughness. The iQOO Z11 also carries IP68/IP69 protection but uses a plastic frame and back with a glass front. While it is well-built, it lacks the additional durability features offered by Redmi. Both phones feature premium AMOLED displays and stereo speakers, giving them a modern flagship-inspired feel.
Display Quality
Each device features a large 6.83-inch AMOLED panel, but the experience differs. The Redmi Note 17 Pro offers a 120Hz refresh rate, 3,500-nit peak brightness, and 3,840Hz PWM dimming for excellent eye comfort. The iQOO Z11 counters with a smoother 144Hz refresh rate, support for one billion colors, HDR, and an even brighter 5,000-nit peak output. The higher refresh rate and richer color reproduction make animations and gaming appear more fluid, while Redmi’s superior PWM dimming may appeal to users sensitive to screen flicker.
The Redmi Note 17 Pro is the stronger choice for durability and display comfort, while the iQOO Z11 delivers a more premium multimedia experience with its brighter, faster display. Users focused on entertainment may prefer iQOO, whereas those seeking long-term resilience will likely appreciate Redmi’s approach.
2. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Redmi Note 17 Pro is powered by the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset paired with up to 12GB RAM and UFS 3.1 storage on higher variants. It delivers dependable everyday performance but is clearly aimed at mainstream users. The iQOO Z11 steps ahead with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 processor, Adreno 810 GPU, and UFS 3.1 storage across all variants. This combination offers noticeably stronger gaming, faster app launches, and better multitasking. Users planning to keep the phone for several years may find the extra performance headroom worthwhile.
Battery and Charging
Battery life is exceptional on both devices, thanks to their massive silicon-carbon batteries. The Redmi Note 17 Pro packs a 9,000mAh battery with 67W fast charging and 22.5W reverse wired charging. The iQOO Z11 slightly increases capacity to 9,020mAh while significantly boosting charging speed to 90W. It also includes bypass charging, helping reduce heat during gaming sessions. Faster charging adds meaningful convenience without compromising the already impressive endurance.
Verdict
The iQOO Z11 wins this category through its superior processor, faster charging, and gaming-focused features. The Redmi Note 17 Pro remains an excellent option for users who prioritize battery longevity over raw performance.
3. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Both smartphones feature a 50MP primary camera with an additional secondary lens, but the hardware and capabilities differ. The Redmi Note 17 Pro relies on PDAF for focusing and supports HDR and panorama photography, with video recording limited to 1080p at 30fps. The iQOO Z11 upgrades to a larger sensor with optical image stabilization, allowing improved low-light performance and steadier photos. It also records 4K video, making it a more versatile camera for content creation. The improvements are practical rather than dramatic, but they become noticeable in challenging lighting conditions.
Selfie Camera
The Redmi Note 17 Pro includes an 8MP front camera capable of 1080p recording, which is adequate for casual video calls and social media. The iQOO Z11 raises the bar with a 32MP selfie camera capable of recording in 4K. Sharper selfies and higher-quality video provide a clear advantage for creators and frequent video callers.
Verdict
The iQOO Z11 comfortably leads the camera department with optical stabilization, 4K recording on both front and rear cameras, and a significantly better selfie sensor. Redmi’s camera is suitable for everyday photography but lacks the versatility offered by its rival.
4. Pricing
Redmi Note 17 Pro is priced around $235 (₹22,690), making it one of the more affordable smartphones in its segment despite offering IP68/IP69K protection, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, a 9,000mAh battery, and an AMOLED display. iQOO Z11 is priced around $300 (₹31,000), placing it in a higher price bracket. That additional investment brings a faster Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 chipset, 144Hz AMOLED display, superior cameras, 90W charging, Wi-Fi 6, and bypass charging.
Is the Price Justified?
The Redmi Note 17 Pro offers exceptional value for buyers seeking maximum battery life and ruggedness without stretching the budget. The iQOO Z11 justifies its premium by delivering meaningful upgrades in performance, cameras, charging speed, and display quality. The higher price feels reasonable because the improvements are noticeable in daily use rather than being limited to specifications alone.
Verdict
Budget-conscious buyers will receive outstanding value from the Redmi Note 17 Pro. Those willing to spend more for a better all-around smartphone experience will find the iQOO Z11 worth the additional cost.
5. Conclusion
Redmi Note 17 Pro stands out with its rugged construction, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection, exceptional durability ratings, and massive 9,000mAh battery, making it particularly appealing for users who prioritize endurance and reliability. The iQOO Z11 distinguishes itself through its Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 processor, smoother 144Hz AMOLED display, 90W fast charging, bypass charging, Wi-Fi 6 connectivity, optical image stabilization, and 32MP 4K selfie camera. Both phones excel in battery life, but they target different priorities. Redmi focuses on toughness and affordability, while iQOO emphasizes performance and a richer multimedia experience.
Verdict
Redmi Note 17 Pro is the better choice for users seeking maximum value, outstanding battery life, and industry-leading durability at a competitive price. The iQOO Z11 is the stronger all-around smartphone thanks to its faster chipset, better cameras, smoother display, and quicker charging. Buyers looking for the most balanced long-term experience should choose the iQOO Z11, while those focused on budget and endurance will be very satisfied with the Redmi Note 17 Pro.
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
