Gigabyte has announced the AI Top Aero, a one-liter mini PC built around Nvidia’s RTX Spark platform. The company has yet to reveal its pricing and availability details.
Gigabyte AI Top Aero Specifications
The system runs on Nvidia’s RTX Spark N1X Superchip, which pairs a 20-core Nvidia Grace CPU with a Blackwell-architecture RTX GPU. For memory, the computer supports up to 128GB of LPDDR5X unified RAM. Because the memory is unified, the CPU and GPU share the same pool of data.
For AI workloads, this means the GPU can access the entire 128GB capacity. Loading large-parameter AI models requires a significant amount of video memory. In a traditional desktop setup, achieving 128GB of VRAM would require installing several discrete graphics cards, which requires a much larger case and power supply. Storage configurations for the mini PC go up to a 4TB PCIe Gen 5 SSD.
To manage the heat generated by the Grace CPU and Blackwell GPU in a one-liter chassis, Gigabyte is using a custom thermal design. This cooling setup is meant to maintain performance during extended workloads, such as long inference tasks or video rendering, without thermal throttling.
Port selection includes USB Type-C and a 10GbE Ethernet connection, alongside Wi-Fi 7 support. The 10-gigabit Ethernet port is a standard addition for workstations that need to transfer large datasets or video files across a local network.
The AI Top Aero runs Windows and uses Nvidia’s CUDA platform. It is compatible with standard local AI tools, including LM Studio, Ollama, and ComfyUI. It also supports Nvidia’s Nemotron models and the Nvidia Pair protocol, which allows users to split inference tasks across multiple devices on the same network.
Aside from development and creative work, the system functions as a standard Windows gaming PC. The Blackwell GPU supports Nvidia’s DLSS 5 technology for upscaling and rendering in compatible games.
In related news, Asus has recently launched the ProArt GR1X mini PC powered by Nvidia’s RTX Spark superchip.
Casio has listed two new watches on its US and Japan websites, made in partnership with the French clothing brand A.P.C. The watches are variations of the standard Casio AQ-240. They are currently listed as coming soon and are slated to be available for purchase later this month.
Pricing and Design Details
The changes for these specific models are entirely visual. A.P.C. generally focuses on simple clothing, and they brought that same approach to the watch dial. On a normal Casio watch, you usually see text printed around the face to label the buttons and highlight key specifications, like water resistance or alarm features.
For these models, Casio and A.P.C. removed that text from the front and moved the button labels to the metal plate on the back. This leaves the front of the watch looking very plain, showing only the watch hands, the digital screen, and both the Casio and A.P.C. logos. The A.P.C. logo is also stamped on the metal band clasp. On the back, there is an engraving of A.P.C.’s guitar and dagger logo.
There are two color options. The AQ-240EGAC-9A is gold-colored with a gold dial and costs $135. The AQ-240EAC-3A is silver-colored with a dark green dial and costs $110.
Both watches use a resin case that measures 40.9 x 35.8 x 8.1 millimeters. They weigh 51 grams. The bands are made of stainless steel and have a clasp that you can adjust yourself without needing special tools.
As for how they work, they have the exact same features as a regular AQ-240. The watch shows the time using physical hands, while the small digital screen at the bottom shows the seconds and the date.
You can also use the digital screen to check the time in a second time zone, run a basic stopwatch, set a daily alarm, or turn on an hourly chime. The watch has basic water resistance and uses a standard resin glass over the dial.
It runs on a regular SR920W watch battery, which Casio says should last for about three years. The watches come in a special box that includes a small pouch.
MSI is expanding its high-end monitor lineup with the MEG X, a 34-inch ultrawide gaming monitor that integrates a high-refresh-rate QD-OLED panel with on-device AI features and next-generation connectivity. The company has yet to reveal its pricing and availability details.
MSI MEG X Monitor Specifications
The monitor offers a 3440 x 1440-pixel (UWQHD) resolution, a 360Hz refresh rate, and a 0.03ms gray-to-gray response time. It uses Samsung’s 5th-gen QD-OLED panel with Penta Tandem technology.
The five-layer structure improves light efficiency by up to 30%, enabling a peak HDR brightness of 1,300 nits. The display also carries VESA DisplayHDR True Black 500 certification.
The panel adopts an RGB Stripe sub-pixel layout. Previous iterations of QD-OLED displays often exhibited color fringing around text, and this standardized pixel arrangement is intended to improve text clarity for office work and web browsing.
The screen is also coated with a DarkArmor Film, which is designed to reduce the purple tint that can affect QD-OLED black levels in bright rooms, while also increasing the screen’s scratch resistance.
MSI is also integrating on-device AI processing. The MEG X includes a dedicated chip to run several features locally, bypassing the need for background PC software. This includes gaming overlays like AI Crosshair and AI Vision+ for brightening dark areas, as well as an AI Super Resolution upscaler.
The processor also powers the monitor’s SpectrumBar+, an RGB light bar integrated into the bottom bezel. Its AI Gauge feature can detect in-game health and energy bars and display their status through the LED strip.
The monitor also features an AI Care Sensor that detects user presence and automatically activates screen protection features to reduce OLED burn-in. MSI is backing the panel with a three-year warranty that explicitly covers burn-in.
Connectivity aligns with newer hardware standards. The MEG X includes a DisplayPort 2.1a (UHBR20) input, providing 80Gbps of bandwidth. This allows the monitor to run at its native 1440p resolution and 360Hz refresh rate without relying on Display Stream Compression (DSC).
The port selection is rounded out by two HDMI 2.1 ports and a USB-C port capable of 98W power delivery, alongside a built-in KVM switch for managing multiple connected devices.
Anker Soundcore AeroClip 2 and Samsung Galaxy Buds On take different approaches to open-ear listening. Both use a clip-on design that keeps the ear canal open, making them suitable for people who dislike traditional in-ear earbuds. However, their priorities are quite different. Anker focuses on Hi-Res audio, LDAC support, durability and AI-powered features, while Samsung puts more emphasis on smart controls, voice assistance, call clarity and its Galaxy ecosystem.
There is also an interesting trade-off in battery life: Samsung promises longer playback, while Anker offers a higher water-resistance rating and a different set of audio features. Neither is designed to provide traditional active noise cancellation, so the comparison comes down to comfort, sound, convenience, and everyday usability.
Both earbuds feature an open-ear clip-on construction, avoiding the pressure associated with silicone ear tips. However, their fitting mechanisms differ. The AeroClip 2 uses Anker’s GoldenFit C-Bridge design, with each earbud weighing approximately 6.2g. Its flexible structure is designed to maintain a secure fit without sealing the ear canal.
The Galaxy Buds On takes a similar approach with flexible clip-on bands and a joint-based structure. This design aims to keep the earbuds comfortably positioned while allowing users to remain aware of their surroundings.
For everyday use, both designs have an advantage over conventional in-ear earbuds, particularly for people who dislike having something inserted into their ears. Actual comfort will still depend on ear shape and individual fit.
Controls and Usability
Anker provides physical button controls, which can help prevent accidental inputs during movement. Samsung offers more interaction options, including touch-and-hold controls, voice commands and head gestures.
Verdict
Samsung offers greater control flexibility, but Anker’s physical buttons may appeal to users who prefer straightforward operation. Neither has an obvious universal comfort advantage, although the AeroClip 2’s IP57 rating provides better protection against dust and water than Samsung’s IP54 rating.
3. Sound Quality
Driver Performance, Bass, Mids and Highs
The AeroClip 2 features 12mm dual-magnet drivers, while the Galaxy Buds On uses 11.3mm TwinBoost dual dynamic drivers. Both configurations are designed to deliver a fuller listening experience despite the absence of a traditional in-ear seal.
Anker has a particularly interesting advantage on paper with its larger drivers and Hi-Res Audio support. Its LDAC compatibility also gives it an advantage for users with compatible Android devices and high-quality audio sources. This makes the AeroClip 2 an appealing option for listeners who prioritise audio specifications.
Samsung counters with 24-bit/96kHz Hi-Fi audio support and 360 Audio, providing a more feature-rich listening experience within its ecosystem. However, driver size alone does not determine sound quality, and neither product’s specifications establish which has better bass response, vocal separation or treble clarity.
Codec Support and Audio Features
Anker supports LDAC and 3D Spatial Audio, while Samsung offers 360 Audio and its own Galaxy-focused audio features.
Verdict
Anker has the more straightforward advantage for codec flexibility, particularly for LDAC-compatible Android users. Samsung makes a stronger case for people already invested in Galaxy devices. Actual sound quality will ultimately depend on tuning and fit.
4. Noise Cancellation and Ambient Listening
Noise Cancellation Quality
Neither the AeroClip 2 nor the Galaxy Buds On offers conventional active noise cancellation (ANC). This is an important distinction because both products are designed around open-ear listening rather than isolating the listener from surrounding noise.
Anker’s minimal sound leakage technology is intended to reduce how much audio escapes from the earbuds. Samsung also features Sound Leakage Cancellation, which addresses sound escaping from the open-ear design. These technologies should not be confused with ANC, which actively reduces external noise reaching the listener.
Ambient and Call Performance
The open-ear construction naturally allows users to hear surrounding sounds without switching to a dedicated transparency mode. This can be useful while walking, working or listening to audio at home.
For calls, Anker combines four MEMS microphones with two bone-conduction sensors and its AI-powered call technology. Samsung uses three microphones, HD Voice, DNN noise reduction and a jaw-sensing VPU. Both manufacturers are targeting clearer voice pickup, although real-world call quality will depend on background noise and microphone processing.
Anker has the more extensive microphone hardware on paper, while Samsung offers a dedicated combination of voice-processing technologies. Neither should be purchased for noise isolation. For people who want environmental awareness, both designs make sense.
5. Battery and Connectivity
Battery Life and Fast Charging
Samsung takes the lead in battery endurance. The Galaxy Buds On delivers up to 9.5 hours of playback from the earbuds and up to 38 hours with its charging case. The AeroClip 2 offers up to 8 hours independently and 32 hours with the case.
That gives Samsung an additional 1.5 hours of standalone playback and six hours of combined battery life. Anker, however, has a useful fast-charging feature: a 10-minute charge provides up to four hours of playback. Samsung also supports wireless charging, which adds convenience when using a compatible charging pad.
Both earbuds support modern Bluetooth connectivity, with Anker using Bluetooth 6.0 and Samsung featuring Bluetooth 6.2. Anker supports dual-device multipoint connections, allowing users to connect two devices simultaneously. Samsung offers Auto Switch, which is particularly convenient when moving between compatible Galaxy devices.
Samsung also supports LE Audio readiness, Gemini and Bixby integration, voice commands and head gestures.
Verdict
Samsung wins on overall battery endurance and wireless charging, while Anker offers more clearly defined conventional multipoint functionality and faster quick charging. Samsung is particularly attractive for Galaxy users, but Anker is more flexible for people switching between different devices.
6. Pricing
Which Offers Better Value?
The AeroClip 2 has an approximate price of $170, compared with around $230 for the Galaxy Buds On. At these dollar prices, Anker is considerably cheaper, with a $60 difference that makes its LDAC support, IP57 protection, four microphones and fast charging particularly attractive.
However, the Indian price estimates tell a different story. The AeroClip 2 is approximately ₹21,000, while the Galaxy Buds On is around ₹20,000. At these prices, Samsung is marginally cheaper, despite being the more expensive option in the US comparison.
This regional difference changes the buying decision considerably. Anker looks like the better deal at the quoted US prices, but Samsung becomes more competitive in India.
Verdict
Anker offers better value at $170, while Samsung is the more affordable choice at the quoted Indian prices. Actual retail prices, discounts and regional availability should be checked before making a purchase.
The Anker Soundcore AeroClip 2 and Samsung Galaxy Buds On are aimed at similar users, but their strengths make them suitable for different priorities.
Choose the Anker Soundcore AeroClip 2 if audio codec flexibility, water resistance, fast charging and broader device compatibility matter more than ecosystem-specific features. It is also the more attractive purchase at the quoted US price.
Choose the Samsung Galaxy Buds On if longer battery life, Galaxy integration, smart controls, wireless charging and voice assistant features are your priorities. Its lower quoted Indian price also makes it worth considering.
Overall, neither is an outright winner. Anker is the more audio-focused and durability-oriented option, while Samsung is the more connected and convenience-focused alternative. The better purchase depends on which features will actually make a difference in everyday listening.
One important buying consideration is that neither model replaces a conventional ANC-equipped pair of earbuds. Their open-ear designs prioritise comfort and environmental awareness over isolation. That makes them better suited to commuting in quieter environments, office use, walking and casual listening than noisy flights or crowded public transport.
At the same time, the price difference should be judged against regional availability rather than global pricing alone. A substantial discount on either model could easily change which one offers the better overall package.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
Edifier’s audio sub-brand Hecate has introduced the Sona Clip, a new pair of open-ear wireless earbuds set to go on sale in China on November 20. It is priced at 468 yuan ($70) and features a clip-on design that attaches to the outer ear, with a focus on high-resolution audio playback and built-in AI features.
Edifier Hecate Sona Clip Specifications
The physical design of the Sona Clip relies on a C-shaped bridge structure. Inside the bridge is a 0.5mm flexible nickel-titanium memory wire, which Edifier says has been tested to withstand 10,000 bends. The frame sits at a 12-degree angle to help keep the earbuds in place while running or moving.
The earbuds feature adaptive wearing, meaning there is no strict left or right earbud. You can clip either bud to either ear, and they will automatically adjust the audio channels accordingly. They will be sold in four colors: Mist White, Soft Gold, Night Mist Black, and Blackberry Pink.
Because open-ear headphones do not create a seal in the ear canal, they usually lose some bass response and leak sound to the people around you. To compensate, Edifier is using dual-magnetic dynamic drivers paired with a bass compensation algorithm and an independent rear acoustic chamber.
The earbuds also use directional audio technology to aim sound directly into the ear. They support Dolby Audio and use the LDAC codec for high-resolution streaming at up to 24-bit/96kHz.
Edifier is also integrating artificial intelligence into the Sona Clip’s software. The earbuds connect to ByteDance’s Doubao and DeepSeek large language models. By double-tapping the earbud, you can activate an AI assistant to answer questions, summarize meetings, or help with writing and coding.
The software also includes a real-time translation tool that supports 21 languages, which can be used for live conversations or translating text via the companion app.
For connectivity, the Sona Clip uses Bluetooth 6.1 and supports multipoint pairing, allowing you to connect two devices simultaneously. Voice calls are handled by a four-microphone array that uses an algorithm to filter out background noise.
The battery is rated for 11 hours of playback on the earbuds alone, while the charging case brings the total up to 44 hours. They are IP56-rated for dust and water resistance, and you can manage settings like touch controls, EQ modes, and a water-draining function through the Edifier Connect app.
In related news, Edifier has recently launched GT3 gaming earbuds with -50dB hybrid ANC and up to 48 hours of battery life.
Xiaomi’s Redmi Band 4 and Redmi Band 3 share several fundamental features, including a 1.47-inch display, 60Hz refresh rate, 5ATM water resistance and 50 sports modes. However, the newer Redmi Band 4 introduces changes to its exterior design, health-monitoring capabilities and claimed battery endurance.
While both devices target users looking for an affordable fitness tracker with everyday smart features, their differences are worth examining before choosing between them. Here is how the two Redmi bands compare across design, display, battery, health tracking and everyday functionality.
Design & Build
The Redmi Band 4 introduces a refreshed exterior with a metal-textured unibody design, replacing the Redmi Band 3’s high-strength fiber-polymer construction. Its 2.5D curved cover glass also gives the newer model a different front appearance compared with the reinforced glass on its predecessor. Xiaomi has updated the strap design as well, moving from the Redmi Band 3’s conventional TPU strap to a vertically textured design on the Redmi Band 4.
These changes give the newer model a more refined appearance, although both retain a lightweight fitness-band design intended for everyday use. The Redmi Band 3’s TPU strap provides a straightforward and practical approach to daily wear.
Winner: Redmi Band 4 – Refreshed exterior with a curved-glass finish and updated strap design.
Display
Both fitness bands feature a 1.47-inch display with a 60Hz refresh rate, keeping their screen sizes and refresh performance on equal footing. This means users upgrading from the Redmi Band 3 should not expect a larger viewing area or a higher refresh rate with the Redmi Band 4.
The main distinction lies in the display’s protective glass and overall presentation. The Redmi Band 4 uses 2.5D curved glass, while the Redmi Band 3 features reinforced glass. The curved-glass treatment gives the newer model a different appearance, complementing its redesigned exterior. However, neither model establishes a clear advantage in screen size or refresh rate.
Winner: Redmi Band 4 – Curved-glass design gives it a refreshed display appearance.
Battery Life & Charging
Battery endurance is one of the more meaningful improvements in the Redmi Band 4. Xiaomi claims up to 21 days of battery life, compared with up to 18 days for the Redmi Band 3. This represents three additional days of claimed usage, potentially reducing how frequently users need to recharge the newer fitness band.
The Redmi Band 4 also offers approximately eight days of battery life with regular monitoring enabled. This provides a more practical indication of endurance when health-monitoring features are being used more frequently. The Redmi Band 3 features a 300mAh lithium-ion polymer battery and supports charging in less than two hours.
Winner: Redmi Band 4 – Three additional days of claimed maximum battery life.
Health Tracking
Both models cover essential health-monitoring requirements, including heart rate monitoring, blood oxygen tracking and sleep monitoring. These features make them suitable for users who want basic health insights throughout the day without investing in a more expensive smartwatch.
The Redmi Band 4 expands this functionality with all-day stress monitoring and women’s health tracking. These additions give the newer model a broader health-monitoring package, particularly for users interested in tracking stress levels and menstrual health alongside their regular fitness data.
The Redmi Band 3 already provides optical heart rate and blood oxygen sensors, making it a capable starting point for everyday health tracking. However, the additional monitoring features give its successor an advantage.
Winner: Redmi Band 4 – Adds all-day stress monitoring and women’s health tracking.
GPS & Navigation
Neither model establishes a dedicated built-in GPS advantage. The Redmi Band 3 does not include built-in GPS, and the Redmi Band 4’s feature set does not establish a standalone GPS capability either.
Consequently, users looking for independent outdoor route tracking should consider a fitness band with dedicated satellite positioning instead. Both Redmi models are better suited to everyday activity monitoring, step tracking and general fitness use than advanced navigation.
For users who primarily exercise indoors, walk around their neighbourhood or track general daily activity, the absence of a dedicated GPS system may not be a significant limitation.
Winner: Tie – Neither model offers a confirmed built-in GPS advantage.
Sports & Training Features
The Redmi Band 4 and Redmi Band 3 both support 50 sports modes, giving them similar coverage for everyday workouts and recreational fitness activities. Whether users prefer indoor exercise, walking or other supported activities, neither model offers a numerical advantage in the number of available sports modes.
The Redmi Band 4 benefits from its additional stress-monitoring capabilities, which complement its fitness features with broader health insights. However, the core sports-mode selection remains unchanged between the two generations.
For users primarily interested in workout variety, the Redmi Band 3 remains competitive. Those wanting a more comprehensive combination of fitness and health monitoring will find the Redmi Band 4 more appealing.
Winner: Tie – Both offer the same 50 sports modes.
Smart Features & Connectivity
The Redmi Band 3 supports Bluetooth 5.3 BLE and Xiaomi HyperOS, alongside compatibility with Android 8.0 or later and iOS 12.0 or later. Its smart functionality includes notifications and other everyday fitness-band features.
The Redmi Band 4 focuses on practical everyday conveniences, including notifications, alarms, watch faces and WeChat and Alipay QR payments. These payment integrations make it particularly useful for users who regularly use Xiaomi’s supported payment ecosystem.
The two devices approach everyday functionality differently, with the Redmi Band 4 highlighting convenient payment-related features while the Redmi Band 3 provides a clearly defined connectivity specification.
Winner: Redmi Band 4 – Offers integrated WeChat and Alipay QR payment functionality.
Outdoor Features & Water Resistance
Both fitness bands feature 5ATM water resistance, making them suitable for water-related activities within the limits of their respective water-resistance ratings. This gives the Redmi Band 4 no particular advantage over its predecessor for everyday exposure to water or swimming-related use.
Neither model offers a confirmed built-in GPS advantage, so users who regularly participate in outdoor running or cycling and require independent route tracking may need a more advanced wearable.
For general outdoor activity tracking, however, both bands provide a similar foundation through their sports modes, health-monitoring capabilities and water-resistant construction.
Winner: Tie – Both feature 5ATM water resistance and similar outdoor-tracking capabilities.
Which One Should You Buy?
The Redmi Band 4 is the more appealing choice for users who want the newer design, additional health-monitoring features and longer claimed battery endurance. Its all-day stress monitoring, women’s health tracking and updated exterior give it meaningful improvements over the Redmi Band 3.
However, the Redmi Band 3 remains a practical option for users who primarily need heart rate monitoring, blood oxygen tracking, sleep monitoring and 50 sports modes. Its 1.47-inch display and 5ATM water resistance also remain competitive against the newer model.
Final Verdict
If you are planning to buy a new fitness band, the Redmi Band 4 is the better choice thanks to its refreshed design, additional health-monitoring features and longer battery life. However, if you already own the Redmi Band 3, there is little reason to upgrade, as the core experience remains largely unchanged and the improvements are relatively incremental.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
Redmi Band 4 vs Redmi Band 3
Category
Redmi Band 4
Redmi Band 3
Winner
Cover Glass
2.5D Curved Glass
Reinforced Glass
Redmi Band 4 – Curved-glass design
Frame Design
Metal-textured Unibody
High-Strength Fiber Polymer
Redmi Band 4 – Refreshed exterior
Strap Design
Vertically Textured
TPU
Redmi Band 4 – Updated design
Display Size
1.47-inch
1.47-inch
Tie – Same size
Refresh Rate
60Hz
60Hz
Tie – Same refresh rate
Battery Life
Up to 21 days
Up to 18 days
Redmi Band 4 – Longer endurance
Regular Monitoring
Approximately 8 days
—
Redmi Band 4 – Additional usage information
Heart Rate Monitoring
Supported
Optical Sensor
Tie – Both supported
Blood Oxygen Monitoring
Supported
Optical Sensor
Tie – Both supported
Stress Monitoring
All-day
—
Redmi Band 4 – Additional tracking
Sleep Tracking
Supported
Supported
Tie – Both supported
Women’s Health Tracking
Supported
—
Redmi Band 4 – Additional feature
Sports Modes
50
50
Tie – Same number
Water Resistance
5ATM
5ATM
Tie – Same rating
Wireless Connectivity
—
Bluetooth 5.3 BLE
Redmi Band 3 – Defined Bluetooth specification
NFC
Not supported
Supported
Redmi Band 3 – NFC support
Smart Features
Notifications, alarms, watch faces, WeChat and Alipay QR payments
Notifications and smart-band functions
Redmi Band 4 – QR payment features
Built-in GPS
—
No
Tie – No established advantage
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
The spec sheets are quietly becoming regional as a growing number of smartphones are launching with different battery capacities for different markets. We see that quite often with devices launched in China or India hitting international store shelves with relatively smaller battery capacities.
Brands do this for various reasons. In most cases, the difference is driven by strict international shipping regulations, local certification delays, and the extra internal clearance required for global 5G bands. So, buying the exact same phone doesn’t mean you’re getting the same spec as users in other regions.
If you’re planning for an upgrade soon, here are the 5 popular phones sold with different battery capacities depending on where you buy them.
The high-end Oppo Find X10 comes in two battery versions depending on the region. Most of Asia and global markets get the bigger 8,000 mAh version. This includes regions like India, China, UAE, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, and Hong Kong.
There’s also a 7,150 mAh version of the Oppo Find X10 for Australia and European markets, including UK, Germany, France, and Spain.
Oppo hasn’t clarified why it ships the Oppo Find X10 with lesser battery capacities in Australia and European markets. However, some industry reports suggest this was done to comply with regional shipping rules without thickening the chassis.
Australia and Europe enforce a strict 20 Wh per-cell transport threshold. The Oppo Find X10 with 8,000 mAh single-cell exceeds that threshold, and so it comes with a dual-cell design in restricted regions. This design adds extra internal dividers and protection circuitry, and to keep the device thin, brands usually choose to reduce the capacity.
Fortunately, both versions carry the same charging support: 80W wired, 50W wireless, and 10W reverse wireless. You can read the complete specs of the Oppo Find X10 on this page.
The Nothing Phone (4b) is a popular mid-range smartphone. It is also available in multiple battery versions depending on the region. Units sold in India get the maximum 6,000 mAh battery, but other regions get a smaller battery.
The Phone (4b) ships in the UK, Europe, and other global regions with a maximum capacity of 5,200 mAh — 800 mAh less than the Indian unit. The reason: to comply with single-cell shipping limits. However, all regions get the same 33W wired charging and 7.5W reverse wired charging.
You can read the complete specs of the Nothing Phone (4b) on this page.
OnePlus Nord 6 is a solid upper mid-range smartphone that comes with a massive 9,000 mAh battery in India, but other regions get a big cut. In Europe and other global markets, the phone comes with a maximum capacity of 7,500 mAh — that’s a 17% cut and it makes a noticeable difference in total screen-on time.
Brands don’t do it out of choice, but to comply with strict single-cell shipping limits without increasing the phone’s thickness. Even 7,500 mAh is still above the limit for a single-cell. Therefore, the Nord 6 has a dual-cell battery.
The non-Indian OnePlus Nord 6 also compromises on charging speeds. The reverse wired charging is limited to 6.5W, while the Indian model supports much higher 27W speed. The regular wired charging speed, however, is the same 80W for all regions.
You can read the complete OnePlus Nord 6 specs on this page.
Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G is another popular device on the list that is offered in two battery versions. In India and China, the device comes with a massive 9,000 mAh battery, but Europe gets a trimmed version with 8,340 mAh battery.
The difference is not that big when compared to the OnePlus Nord 6, but still the difference impacts the total battery backup. Again, the reason is the same: to comply with the international aviation and European transport laws.
Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G units shipped to India and China have a single-cell battery, while European users get a dual-cell battery (to not exceed the 20 Wh single-cell ceiling). The charging speeds remain the same, though: 67W wired charging and 22.5W reverse wired charging.
You can check out the complete specs of the Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G on this page.
Unlike other phones on the list, the iQOO Z11 5G gets a smaller 7,050 mAh battery in India, while other regions, including China and Malaysia, get a much higher 9,000 mAh capacity — that’s a solid 22% reduction in total capacity for the Indian buyers, and that could make a big difference, especially if you’re a heavy user.
Charging capabilities are also different, and Indian users are making the compromise again. In that region, the iQOO Z11 comes with 44W charging support, while Chinese and Malaysian units offer a whopping 90W fast charging.
The iQOO Z11 also has different designs and chipsets based on which country you purchase it from. It’s better to take a little extra time and understand the difference to make an informed decision. You can check out detailed specs here: iQOO Z11 (India) and iQOO Z11 (China).
If you’re into mechanical keyboards, you might want to check out the new Ultra68 from Dareu, which just launched in China. It’s built with a solid aluminum body, but the real standout is its modular design that lets you physically change the layout of the board. You can actually pop off the function row and swap it out for a small LED screen.
Dareu Ultra68 Keyboard Specifications
Depending on your preference, you can set the board up as a standard 75% layout or size it down to a more compact 68-key footprint. If you decide to remove the Fn key section, you can snap in a 335-LED dot-matrix display instead. It’s a fun addition that lets you show off pixel art, animated GIFs, or scrolling text.
To manage the screen and tweak your RGB lighting, Dareu uses UniHub. It’s a web-based driver that works right in your browser, which is pretty convenient since it saves you from having to download and install dedicated desktop software.
Under the hood, the Ultra68 packs the kind of features you’d expect from a modern gaming keyboard, especially when it comes to adjustable actuation. Dareu is offering two different switch setups. The wired-only version uses the company’s own Luban magnetic switches.
These give you an adjustable actuation range from 0.1mm to 3.5mm, a total travel distance of 3.5mm, a light 35gf actuation force, and a 55gf bottom-out force. If you prefer going wireless, the dual-mode version uses Kailh’s Thunder inductive switches.
When you’re plugged in via cable, both models support a fast 8,000Hz polling rate, which Dareu says brings the latency down to just 0.125ms. They also feature Rapid Trigger support with a fine adjustment precision of 0.01mm, along with a 32KHz full-key scanning rate to make sure your inputs register as quickly as possible.
As for the build itself, it’s put together nicely. You get an aluminum alloy chassis, an FR4 positioning plate, and a gasket-mounted structure. Inside, there are four layers of sound-dampening material to help with acoustics: PORON foam, an IXPE switch pad, a PET layer, and PORON bottom foam. It’s got some heft to it, too, the wired version weighs 1.9kg, while the dual-mode model comes in at 1.7kg.
Interestingly, the two versions handle the modular swapping a bit differently. The wired model uses a ball-bearing mechanism to lock the modules in place, while the dual-mode version relies on magnetic attachments.
The dual-mode version also gives you 2.4GHz wireless connectivity (which runs at a standard 1,000Hz polling rate) and is powered by a built-in 8,000mAh battery. Whichever one you go with, the box includes the keyboard, the expansion module, a manual, a keycap puller, a switch puller, and a USB cable.
Pricing
If you’re looking at pricing and colors, the Ultra68 has a few options. The wired Luban magnetic switch version comes in a sandblasted Metallic Black for 799 yuan (about $120) or a brushed Burgundy for 849 yuan ($127). The dual-mode Kailh Thunder inductive switch version is available in a brushed Metallic Silver finish for 999 yuan ($150).
On November 11, crowdfunding opened for the Mijia Floor Lamp (model MJLD01YL). The regular price is listed at 999 yuan (~$149), but the crowdfunding price is 719 yuan (~$107). The design is deliberately simple: tall, slim, and stable enough that it should sit cleanly in a living room, bedroom, or media setup without drawing too much attention to itself.
What makes it interesting is the dual light system. One source is RGB (custom IC LEDs) and can do the full 16 million colors for pure ambiance. The other uses WRGB high-efficiency LEDs and handles more practical, softer illumination. You can run them separately or together, so you get everything from soft mood lighting to something actually useful for reading or moving around the room.
There are 18 built-in effects in total: 10 static ones (sunset, meditation, reading, night light, and similar fixed looks) and 8 dynamic ones (aurora, flowing light, breathing patterns, etc.). Brightness goes from 1% to 100%, and the color temperature ranges from a very warm 1800K all the way up to 6500K. There’s also a dedicated night-light mode for low-level illumination after dark.
Controls are simple. A circular touch ring at the bottom of the light head lets you tap to turn it on/off, slide for brightness, and long-press to cycle through effects. For full customization, schedules, and scene linking, you’ll use the Mi Home app. It also works with XiaoAI voice commands and slots into Xiaomi’s HyperOS ecosystem so it can talk to other devices.
Specs-wise, it’s rated at 21W, connects over 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, and the base is designed to stay put. Installation is supposed to be straightforward.
This is Xiaomi pushing its smart lighting beyond desk lamps and ceiling fixtures into freestanding ambient lighting. Dual independent sources, lots of color and effect options, and solid app/voice integration make it feel like a flexible atmosphere piece rather than just another smart bulb on a stick. Right now it’s only available through the ongoing crowdfunding campaign on Xiaomi Youpin.
Google‘s first official item tracker, the Pixel Tag, is now available starting November 11. The slim tag works with the Find Hub network to help you locate keys, wallets, and luggage from an Android phone. A single Pixel Tag is priced at $29.99 from the Google Store, while a four-pack is $99.99.
Google Pixel Tag specifications and features
Google Pixel Tag
The Pixel Tag measures 28 x 46.1 x 5.4 mm and weighs 11.8 grams with the battery, or 8.8 grams without it. Google built it from polycarbonate and metal in a single Fog color, slim enough to slip into a wallet. It is rated IP67, so it can handle dust and up to 1 meter of water for 30 minutes.
Setup uses Fast Pair on phones running Android 9 or later. Find Hub can show the tag on a map and, when it is far away, use a crowdsourced network of more than 1 billion Android devices, with end-to-end encrypted location data. Nearby, Ultra Wideband can show visual direction and distance, while Bluetooth Channel Sounding offers distance guidance on compatible phones running Android 16 and Bluetooth 6.0 or later.
You can play a sound from the built-in speaker, and a button on the tag can ring your phone even if it is on silent. The user-replaceable CR2032 battery is rated for over a year, and you can share a tag with up to 10 people. Left Behind alerts are optional, and you can also ring the tag from a Pixel Watch or ask Gemini through Pixel Buds.
Google Pixel Tag price and availability
Google Pixel Tag
A single Pixel Tag is $29.99 and a four-pack is $99.99, starting November 11 from the US Google Store. It was first unveiled in August alongside the Pixel 11 series, and now gives Android users a first-party alternative to the AirTag and Galaxy SmartTag2. It comes in Fog, with a one-year warranty in the US, and joins other Bluetooth trackers such as the Moto Tag 2.
A new Oppo phone is being discussed as the Oppo A7 Ultra, according to tipster Digital Chat Station. The leak points to a launch around December and a massive 12,000mAh battery. Oppo has not confirmed the name, the timing, or the claims.
Oppo A7 Ultra launch window and battery tip
Oppo A7 Ultra
In a Weibo post today, DCS said the Oppo A7 Ultra is expected to be released around December and is being positioned as a 10,000mAh-class phone. The tipster also suggested it may be the model with a horizontal camera matrix and a 12,000mAh cell. The leak did not mention a chipset, display, charging speed, or price.
That description matches the Oppo PNC110, which recently appeared on China’s MIIT network access license with official images. Those photos show a purple 5G phone with a pill-shaped horizontal camera island, two lenses, a flash, and “AI CAMERA SYSTEM” printed on the module. The Oppo logo is placed low on the rear panel.
Oppo A7 Ultra design and A-series context
Oppo A7 Ultra
The official set also includes two side views, one of which shows the volume rocker, the power button, and the raised camera module. The front is a flat screen with a punch-hole selfie camera in the center. The license describes a 5G phone with dual-SIM support.
Earlier reports put the PNC110’s rated capacity at about 11,460mAh to 11,640mAh, so the exact number is still unclear. The typical figure is likely to be marketed at around 12,000mAh, which would make this Oppo’s largest phone battery to date and a step up from the Oppo A7 Pro Max. That model launched in China on August 4 with a 10,000mAh battery and later went on sale outside China.
If the name holds, the A7 Ultra would join the current A7 family, which already includes the Oppo A7 Pro and its 8,000mAh battery. Last year’s Oppo A6 series used 7,000mAh cells on its main models. Until Oppo confirms the name and the rest of the specs, this should be treated as an early leak.
Would a 12,000mAh Oppo A7 Ultra arriving around December interest you, or do you want to see the rest of the specs first? Let us know in the comments below.
Amazon US has the Citizen AW5027-44W Doctor Doom watch at $425, down from its $495 launch price, a $69.29 (14%) saving. It’s worth it if you’re a Doom or Marvel fan who wants a battery-free watch you’ll actually wear.
Citizen launched the AW5027-44W in the US in October 2026 at $495. At $425.71, Amazon is $69.29 below that, or 14% off list price. It’s a modest saving, but a real one on a watch that’s barely a month old.
Citizen hasn’t made an official price cut on this model. This is an Amazon discount, not a markdown from Citizen. It is the lowest price since its launch, but the watch only launched in October, so that window is short.
Price now
$425.71
List price
$495
You save
$69.29 (14%)
Price as of
11 Nov 2026, 1AM EDT
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
What you get
Mask dial: The gray dial builds Doctor Doom’s metal mask up in relief instead of printing it on. This is what you’re paying for, and gold-tone hands keep it from looking like a toy.
Eco-Drive: Citizen’s J810 light-powered quartz runs three hands and a date at 3 o’clock. You never need a battery change.
Daily-wear build: The 42.5mm grey stainless steel case weighs 88g, uses 20mm lugs and is rated to 100m. It’s tough enough for swimming and everyday knocks, though the crystal is mineral, not sapphire.
Collector extras: A textured green leather strap, a Doom logo etched on the case back, a display box and a double-sided coin. That makes it an easy gift.
What users liked and what they didn’t
Liked:
The relief mask dial is the standout, and it reads as more than a printed logo.
Gold hands and green accents keep the theme fairly restrained.
The coin, box, and etched case back suit collectors and gift buyers.
Eco-Drive means no battery swaps.
100 m water resistance makes it practical for daily wear.
Didn’t like:
Mineral crystal scratches more easily than sapphire, which stands out at this price.
Underneath, it’s a plain three-hand quartz watch, so most of the cost is the character design.
Citizen doesn’t say how long the lume lasts.
How it compares
CITIZEN Men’s Eco-Drive Fantastic Four 39mm Super Titanium AW0131-66W ($468.75 on Amazon US): The Fantastic Four model suits smaller wrists. It’s a 39mm limited-edition Marvel Eco-Drive in lighter Super Titanium, and it also comes with a coin.
CITIZEN Men’s Eco-Drive Marvel’s X-Men 42.3mm Stainless Steel AW5007-17W ($281 on Amazon US): X-Men fans get the same recipe here: Eco-Drive, mineral crystal, and a leather strap, in a near-identical 42.3mm steel case. Choose it if the character matters more to you than the mask dial.
CITIZEN Men’s Automatic Tsuyosa 40mm Stainless Steel NJ0151-53Z ($371.25 on Amazon US): If you’d rather have a regular watch than a character piece, the Tsuyosa is the one. It’s a 40mm Citizen with a mechanical automatic movement and a steel bracelet.
Rival prices on Amazon US as of 11 Nov 2026, 1AM EDT. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Should you buy it?
Buy it now if you’re a Doctor Doom or Marvel collector who wants a wearable, battery-free watch or a gift that arrives looking the part. Skip it if you want sapphire, a mechanical movement, or a non-themed design, because that money buys more watches elsewhere.
Oppo has officially confirmed the camera setup on the standard Oppo Reno 17 ahead of its China launch. The vanilla model uses four 50-megapixel cameras and is promoted as a Live Photo-focused phone. It will be unveiled on November 16 at 7 PM China time, alongside the Reno 17 Pro.
Oppo Reno 17 official camera specs
Oppo Reno 17
A new official teaser spells out the hardware on the standard Reno 17. It lists a 50-megapixel ultra-clear main camera, a 50-megapixel periscope telephoto, and a 50-megapixel ultra-wide on the rear, plus a 50-megapixel ultra-wide selfie camera.
That is a shift from the Chinese Reno 16 and Reno 16 Pro, which both launched with a 200-megapixel main camera, a 50-megapixel ultra-wide, and a 50-megapixel periscope on the rear, plus a 50-megapixel front camera. The vanilla Reno 17 moves to four 50-megapixel cameras, compared with the 200-megapixel main on its predecessors.
Oppo says the Reno 17 series includes the Reno 17 and the Reno 17 Pro, and that specifications vary by model. The poster notes that the pictured phone is the Reno 17, and that “ultra-clear four main cameras” means all four cameras use 50-megapixel or higher sensors. This list is therefore for the vanilla Reno 17 only. It is not clear yet whether Oppo will also drop the 200-megapixel primary sensor on the Reno 17 Pro.
Live Photo features and the November 16 launch
On official Weibo today, Oppo framed the series as a Live Photo phone that keeps casual shots sharp across every focal length. It highlighted ultra-clear natural-color Live Photos that reproduce the light and color of the moment, plus 4K long Live Photos that run for six seconds.
A new Live Photo color palette is part of the same tease, and Oppo says a light swipe can produce a ready-to-share look. Official creatives show bluer skies, warmer light, and a cinematic grade.
Oppo locked in the November 16 China event last week, when official images of the Reno 17 and Reno 17 Pro went live. Pricing and any camera differences on the Pro should be confirmed at the event.
Which Reno 17 camera are you most interested in trying first, the 50-megapixel periscope or the ultra-wide selfie camera? Let us know in the comments.
Samsung’s Galaxy W27 and Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra present an unusual comparison. Rather than two competing foldables with substantially different hardware, they represent two regional interpretations of Samsung’s premium foldable flagship. The W27 targets China’s luxury smartphone market, while the Z Fold8 Ultra serves international buyers. Despite their shared hardware, a few exclusive features and regional differences make this comparison interesting.
Did You Know? The Samsung Galaxy W27 belongs to Samsung’s China-exclusive W Series, developed in partnership with China Telecom under the Heart to the World brand. Unlike the globally marketed Galaxy Z Fold series, the W lineup targets China’s premium luxury smartphone segment, bringing exclusive designs, premium packaging and China-specific features such as Tiantong satellite communication. The W27 is therefore more than a regional rename of the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra; it represents Samsung’s luxury-focused approach to the Chinese market.
The Galaxy W27 stands out with a more extravagant design, featuring gold-coloured accents, a textured frame and two distinctive finishes: Jixia Hong and Jihu Blue. Its premium appearance reflects Samsung’s China-exclusive Heart to the World series, giving it a more luxurious identity than the conventional flagship styling of the Z Fold8 Ultra.
The Z Fold8 Ultra takes a comparatively understated approach, prioritising a familiar flagship aesthetic. Both phones feature Advanced Armor Aluminum construction, IP48 protection and Gorilla Glass Ceramic 3 cover protection. The W27 looks more exclusive, but the Z Fold8 Ultra’s traditional styling makes it the more universally appealing option.
Display Quality
There is practically no reason to choose one over the other for display quality. Both feature an 8-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X main display with a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, 3,000-nit peak brightness and HDR10+ support. Their 6.5-inch cover displays also share 120Hz refresh rates and the same resolution.
The Z Fold8 Ultra additionally features LTPO AMOLED technology and an anti-reflective coating in its main display specifications. Both deliver an excellent experience for multitasking, gaming and watching content, although the Ultra has a slight advantage on paper in display technology.
Verdict
The W27 wins on visual exclusivity, while the Z Fold8 Ultra offers a more understated flagship aesthetic. Display performance is virtually identical, making design the primary reason to prefer either model.
3. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
Both foldables use Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy processor and Adreno 840 GPU, making their underlying performance practically identical. However, the W27 simplifies the buying decision with 16GB RAM as standard and 512GB or 1TB storage configurations.
The Z Fold8 Ultra offers greater flexibility, starting with 12GB RAM and 256GB storage, while higher configurations provide up to 16GB RAM and 1TB storage. Both run Android 17 with One UI 9, and the global model offers up to seven major Android upgrades. Neither has a meaningful processing advantage, although the W27’s higher starting memory configuration is appealing.
Battery and Charging
Battery performance is another area where Samsung maintains parity. Both smartphones pack a 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging and 20W wireless charging. Reverse wireless charging is also available, allowing users to power compatible accessories.
Neither device offers a substantial battery advantage, and their charging capabilities should deliver a similar everyday experience. The Z Fold8 Ultra supports Qi2.2 wireless charging, while the W27 also brings 20W wireless charging. Battery capacity and charging speeds are not meaningful reasons to choose the more expensive model.
Verdict
Performance and battery life are essentially tied. The W27 gets an advantage in its minimum RAM configuration, but the Z Fold8 Ultra offers more affordable entry-level configurations without sacrificing processing power.
4. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Samsung equips both foldables with the same triple-camera arrangement: a 200MP primary sensor with OIS, a 50MP ultra-wide camera and a 10MP telephoto camera with OIS and 3x optical zoom. This gives both devices comparable photographic versatility, from detailed everyday shots to wider landscapes and zoom photography.
Video capabilities are similarly impressive, with support for 8K recording at 30fps and 4K recording at up to 120fps. The identical camera hardware means buyers should not expect the W27 to deliver a significant improvement in image quality. Both are well-equipped flagship camera systems, with no meaningful hardware advantage for either model.
Selfie Camera
The front camera hardware is also unchanged. Both smartphones feature a 10MP inner display camera and a separate 10MP cover camera, providing flexibility for video calls, selfies and content creation.
The cover camera is particularly useful for taking selfies with the rear display preview, while the inner camera accommodates video calls when the device is unfolded. Since the camera specifications are identical, choosing the W27 does not bring an additional photography advantage. The Z Fold8 Ultra remains equally capable for everyday selfies and video communication.
Verdict
Neither smartphone wins the camera battle. Their identical 200MP main, 50MP ultra-wide and 10MP telephoto setups deliver essentially the same photographic capabilities, making camera performance irrelevant to the buying decision.
5. Pricing
The Samsung Galaxy W27 starts at ¥18,999 (priced around $2,830) for its 16GB/512GB configuration, while the 16GB/1TB model costs ¥21,999 (priced around $3,275). The Z Fold8 Ultra has a significantly broader lineup, with its entry-level US pricing starting around $2,100. Higher configurations cost more, with the 16GB/1TB version positioned closer to the W27’s premium pricing. This makes the W27 considerably more expensive at the entry level, despite sharing almost all its core hardware with the global model.
Is the price justified?
The W27’s premium pricing reflects its exclusive positioning, distinctive gold-accented design, satellite communication and higher minimum memory configuration. Samsung also bundles premium accessories, including a Kevlar magnetic case and a 45W charger in China. However, these extras do not fundamentally change the smartphone experience.
The Z Fold8 Ultra offers nearly identical hardware at a lower entry price, with broader regional availability and more flexible configurations. For most buyers, paying extra for the W27 is difficult to justify when its biggest advantages are cosmetic and region-specific.
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the clear value-for-money winner. The W27 is a luxury alternative, but its premium price is difficult to justify through hardware differences alone.
The Galaxy W27’s biggest differentiator is its Tiantong satellite communication, supporting satellite calls and messages when conventional mobile networks are unavailable. It also brings exclusive China-market styling, a premium gold-accented finish, 16GB RAM as standard, and a more elaborate retail package.
The Z Fold8 Ultra counters with wider international availability, more storage and memory configurations, and a more practical buying experience outside China. Importantly, the W27’s satellite functionality is tied to China’s Tiantong network and relevant carrier services, so it should not be considered a universal advantage for international buyers.
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the better purchase for most consumers, offering virtually identical flagship hardware, broader availability and better value. The W27 makes sense primarily for buyers who specifically want its exclusive design, China-market positioning and satellite communication features. Ultimately, it is a more luxurious regional alternative rather than a hardware upgrade.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
Redmi is already planning a battery bigger than the one in the Redmi K100. We followed the Redmi K100’s 10,000mAh cell from an August leak to its official confirmation before the phone’s official launch in October. A new leak now says a 12,000mAh cell has finished mass-production planning.
The leak further says the cell is meant for a mid-to-high-end phone. However, it does not name the model.
Another claim in the leak is that the company is working on an even bigger cell. A battery of roughly 13,000mAh to 14,000mAh is said to be under active evaluation. It could go into mass production next year, though it’s written in pencil.
Redmi’s battery push timeline
Redmi has raised its battery ceiling fast. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max launched in January with a 9,000mAh battery. That was the biggest cell on a Redmi phone at the time. The Redmi K100 reached 10,000mAh by October and pairs it with 100W wired charging. A 12,000mAh phone would add 3,000mAh to the Redmi Turbo 5 Max in under a year.
Other phones are already in the queue. Earlier leaks pointed to more than 10,000mAh for the Redmi Turbo 6 Max. An April leak put roughly 10,000mAh in the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max. The new leak does not say whether the 12,000mAh cell belongs to either phone.
AI Altered Image
You can’t tell much else yet. The leak says nothing about charging speed, thickness, weight, or price. For reference, the Redmi K100 starts at about $525 (CNY 3,499). Mass-production planning also comes before a launch. It does not set a date.
Availability is another open question. The Redmi K100 is still China-only and the company has shared no hints of its global release either. The said 12,000mAh Redmi phone could do the same.
Honor’s first wide-screen phone could have a bigger battery than the Huawei Pura X View that started the trend. According to tipster Digital Chat Station (DCS), the upcoming 6.39-inch phone will pack a battery rated at 8,000mAh or higher. The tipster also claims this would be the largest battery in its category.
The leak follows a report from last month in which DCS said Oppo and Honor would lead Android brands into the wide-screen candybar phone market after Huawei introduced the Pura X View.
Same screen size, bigger battery
The Huawei Pura X View has a 6.39-inch OLED display with a 16:9.5 aspect ratio and a 7,000mAh battery. Honor’s phone is tipped to have the same screen size but at least 1,000mAh more battery capacity.
However, fitting a larger battery into a phone this size could affect its dimensions and weight. DCS has not shared either figure, so it remains to be seen how thick the Honor phone will be. For comparison, the Pura X View measures just 6.68mm thick.
The leak also mentions a 200MP triple rear camera system with a large sensor and a periscope lens. DCS has not clarified whether the 200MP sensor will serve as the main camera or the telephoto camera.
Moreover, the leak claims early engineering samples of the phone reportedly run on a Snapdragon processor, although the tipster has not revealed which chip Honor is testing.
Large batteries have also featured in DCS’s recent Honor leaks. The tipster previously claimed the Honor 700 series would come with a 9,000mAh battery and a 200MP main camera.
Honor has made no comments on whether and when it plans to launch a wide-screen phone. The battery, camera, and processor details are based on early engineering samples, so they could change before the device reaches the market.
A new image claims to show dummy models of the iPhone 18 and iPhone Air 2. It follows the X-ray images of the iPhone 18 and iPhone 18e that surfaced earlier this month. This time, the images show the rear designs of both phones.
The models shown in the video appear to be CNC-machined aluminium. The leak does not explain what they are intended for, although they could be moulds used to make protective cases. That would explain why they only show the phones’ outer shapes without any internal details. Apple has not confirmed any of this, so the designs should be treated as unverified.
Starting with the iPhone 18, its dummy model shows a rear design similar to the iPhone 17. There are two cameras arranged vertically inside a pill-shaped module. If the dummy is accurate, Apple will keep the same camera layout for another generation.
The iPhone Air 2, meanwhile, has a more noticeable change. Its dummy model shows a raised camera section similar to the original iPhone Air, but with two camera cut-outs instead of one. There is also a smaller circular cut-out beside them, likely for the LED flash. The current iPhone Air has just one rear camera, so adding a second would be a significant hardware change.
An earlier supply-chain leak claimed Apple was reworking the iPhone Air 2 with a sleeker design. The report also mentioned plans to address some of the biggest complaints about the first model. Adding a second rear camera would tackle one of the common criticisms of the original iPhone Air.
What the X-ray leak said about the battery
The earlier X-ray images also included some battery information. According to their annotations, the iPhone 18 could get a 4,430mAh battery, up from 3,671mAh in the previous model. That’s an increase of around 20%. The images also suggest Apple may remove the physical SIM tray to make room for the larger battery, although the higher capacity likely applies to eSIM-only versions. For reference, Apple’s listed battery capacity for the iPhone 17 is slightly higher at 3,692mAh.
The iPhone 18e is also expected to share the iPhone 18’s internal layout. Its battery could increase from 4,005mAh in the iPhone 17e to 4,430mAh, a roughly 10% jump.
All three phones, including the iPhone Air 2, are expected to arrive in spring 2027. However, dummy models and X-ray scans don’t always reflect the final hardware, so the camera designs and battery capacities could still change before launch. Apple has yet to announce any of these models, and more leaks are likely to surface in the coming months.
Some fresh X-ray images of two unreleased iPhones have started circulating online. The scans, shared by a known leaker, suggest Apple is reusing a lot of the same internal layout across models while making targeted tweaks. The details point to bigger batteries and closer alignment between the regular iPhone and the more affordable “e” model expected around spring 2027.
The images were posted on Baidu Tieba’s Qualcomm forum by Littertree66. They show automated X-ray inspection scans of two devices: one codenamed Taycan (V67 K), which the leaker links to the standard iPhone 18, and another called Nevera (V69), said to be the iPhone 18e. Both phones look nearly identical inside. The north and south logic boards sit in the same spots, the battery footprint matches, and even the MagSafe coils line up.
On the Taycan images, annotations claim that dropping the physical SIM tray opened up space for a larger battery. The bottom speaker and haptic motor also switched from a long, narrow design to a wider one. Together those changes are said to push capacity from a baseline of about 3,671 mAh up to 4,430 mAh, roughly a 20% jump. That baseline is actually a bit lower than the 3,692 mAh Apple lists for the current iPhone 17, so the bigger number would likely apply to eSIM-only versions.
The wide camera module also looks physically smaller than the previous generation, though the sensor resolution is described as unchanged. A part labeled “BG1 Array” sits below the dual rear cameras and is thought to support the second lens.
The Nevera scans claim the iPhone 18e uses the same overall design and also jumps to that same 4,430 mAh battery, a roughly 10% increase from the iPhone 17e’s 4,005 mAh. It shows a single rear “Wide” camera sitting where the standard model has its Super Wide unit, with the leftover space filled by what looks like plastic filler.
Pre-production hardware can change before retail, so the final specs could still shift. Even so, the idea of a shared platform and larger batteries across both models lines up with earlier rumors that the standard and “e” iPhones would get closer.
AOC has released the Agon AG277UXA, a new 27-inch monitor in China that features a dual-mode display. The monitor is designed to run at either a 4K (3840 x 2160) resolution with a 200Hz refresh rate or a 1080p (1920 x 1080) resolution at 400Hz.
AOC Agon AG277UXA Monitor Specifications
To switch between the two modes, AOC has included a dedicated hardware button on the monitor. The display also has settings to change the active viewing area. You can digitally shrink the picture to a 24.5-inch size or use a 4:3 aspect ratio at a 1280 x 960 resolution.
These specific configurations are often used by esports players who prefer a smaller, more centralized field of view. The monitor uses a Fast IPS panel with a 1ms gray-to-gray response time and a 0.3ms MPRT, alongside custom overdrive tuning meant to reduce motion blur and ghosting.
For color and brightness, the AG277UXA covers 95% of the DCI-P3 gamut and supports 10-bit color. It has a peak brightness of 450 nits and carries DisplayHDR 400 certification. The displays are factory-calibrated to a Delta E of less than 1.
The screen surface uses a three-layer treatment: a standard anti-glare coating, an anti-reflection layer to cut down on ambient light interference, and an oleophobic anti-fingerprint coating to make wiping away dust and smudges easier.
The port selection includes one DisplayPort 2.1 connection with 54Gbps of bandwidth, two HDMI 2.1 ports, and a USB-C port. The USB-C port supports video input but only provides 15W of power delivery, which can charge smaller accessories like a phone but will not power a laptop.
The monitor also features a built-in KVM switch for controlling two computers with one mouse and keyboard, a three-port USB-A hub, and a built-in headphone hook.
The included stand adjusts for height, tilt, swivel, and pivot. On the back of the monitor, there is an RGB lighting array that integrates natively with Windows 11 Dynamic Lighting, meaning you can sync the lights with other hardware without downloading extra software.
Pricing and Availability
The AG277UXA is currently available in China with a standard retail price of 2,999 yuan ($450) and an initial launch price of 2,199 yuan ($330).
Timex is tapping into 1970s nostalgia with its latest release, a limited-edition watch commemorating the 50th anniversary of the original Rocky film. The Rocky 50th Anniversary Timex Viscount 1976 revives a specific design from the same year the movie debuted, pairing vintage aesthetics with modern automatic internals.
From a hardware perspective, the watch leans heavily into its retro roots. It features a 38mm stainless-steel case, a size that aligns well with current trends favoring smaller, more traditional wristwatches over the oversized models of the past decade. The case construction mixes circular brushing with polished edges and a polished bezel.
On the front, there’s a heavily textured dial punctuated by gold-tone hour markers, matching hands, and a standard date window at the 3 o’clock position. Timex also opted for a vintage-style domed acrylic crystal, a design choice that adds period-accurate distortion and character, though buyers should note that acrylic is naturally more prone to scratches than modern sapphire glass.
The movie tie-in is handled directly. There is a prominent gold-tone Rocky 50th-anniversary logo stamped on the dial. On the reverse side, an exhibition case back displays a second anniversary logo alongside an engraved unique edition number, confirming this will be a limited production run. The watch ships with a fully brushed stainless-steel bracelet equipped with quick-release spring bars for tool-less strap swapping.
Inside, Timex is using a Miyota 8215 automatic movement. It’s a familiar, reliable Japanese workhorse caliber that relies on the movement of the wearer’s wrist to stay wound, offering a standard 40-hour power reserve.
It’s not a high-end luxury movement, but it fits perfectly within Timex’s usual wheelhouse of accessible, durable timepieces, and you can see the mechanics operating through the rear display window.
Pricing and Availability
Timex hasn’t officially listed the watch on its storefront, and the company hasn’t disclosed pricing or the exact number of units that will be produced. Given the Miyota movement and standard stainless steel construction, it will likely sit in the brand’s mid-tier pricing bracket, but franchise fans and watch collectors will have to wait for the final retail details to drop.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
