Advertisement

Vivo X500 hands-on image reveals new Dimensity 9600M chip

By
Rajesh Regmi
-

Vivo confirmed the standard X500’s camera hardware through a Weibo teaser from earlier this month, and now tipster Panda is Bald has gone hands-on with the phone itself. The image reveals several details that Vivo has yet to officially announce, including the chipset, memory, storage, and battery.

Also ReadVivo X500 series roundup: Specs, leaks, and launch details

The X500 is powered by a Dimensity 9600M running at 4.21GHz across its eight cores. The base configuration comes with 12GB of RAM and 512GB of storage. Vivo also supports virtual memory expansion of up to 24GB and storage expansion of up to 50GB through compression. 

Vivo X500 hands-on

What’s notable here is that this is the first mention or on-device confirmation of Dimensity 9600M. The chip is likely based on Dimensity 9500, which was previously rumored to be rebranded for some 2026 flagship.

There’s one more chip

As for the cameras, the X500 uses the same main sensor as the X300 Pro: a Blueprint-branded Sony LYTIA-828 measuring 1/1.28-inch. Vivo says this is the largest main camera sensor it has used on a standard X-series model. The camera also gets Zeiss gimbal-level stabilization with a CIPA 5.5 rating.

The telephoto camera comes from the X500 Pro instead. It uses the Sony LYTIA-610 sensor found in the Pro’s APO telephoto setup, also with a CIPA 5.5 stabilization rating. It can record 4K video at 120fps for slow-motion footage.

Vivo could also offer the standard X500 with dedicated teleconverter support. The compact accessory is designed to extend its telephoto capabilities. Meanwhile, the image processing will be handled by Vivo’s Blueprint V3+ imaging chip. 

Keeping the lights on is a 7,500mAh battery, as confirmed in the spec sheet.

Also ReadTop 5 Dimensity 9500 phones in 2026

Vivo will reveal the X500’s price and availability at the official launch on September 21 at 7 PM. The X500 series will be introduced alongside several other products.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Source)

Honor Magic 9 series confirmed to feature Android’s first 55MP square selfie camera

By
Rajesh Regmi
-

Honor has already confirmed that the Magic9 series will bring a 500mm teleconverter kit and dual 200-megapixel ARRI cameras on the back. The company today revealed the front camera, and it comes with its own unusual design.

Also ReadBest camera phones with 200MP sensor in 2026

Honor says the Magic9 series will feature a 55MP “Agile Eye” front camera with a square-shaped design. It is the first Android phone with a square front-facing camera, which the company says gives the sensor more room to capture a wider frame than the circular and pill-shaped cameras commonly used on phones.

Honor Magic 9 series 55MP square selfie camera

Honor’s teaser also shows the camera switching between vertical and horizontal shots while keeping a wide field of view. 

However, the square front camera will not be available across the entire Magic 9 lineup. In the teaser footnote, Honor confirmed the square selfie camera will be exclusive to the Magic 9 Pro Max and the standard Magic 9. More details about the other models should arrive with the full launch.

More about Honor Magic 9 series cameras

The front camera is just one part of Honor’s camera-focused approach to the Magic 9 series. The company has worked with ARRI on the lineup, while the rear camera module houses a triple-camera system with two 200-megapixel ARRI sensors. Honor is also introducing a 500mm teleconverter with the series.

For video, the phones will also get a new ARRI Cinema Mode. Honor is positioning the Magic 9 series as a more complete camera system rather than simply another phone with high-resolution sensors.

Honor Magic 9 series pre-reservations
Honor Magic 9 series

The Magic 9 Pro Max gets most of the camera hardware and keeps the clean design language seen on previous Magic phones. Honor has reworked the edges, rear panel, and overall shape, while the rear camera module gets a new “Guide’s Eye” design.

Also ReadGizmoChina’s Best of 2025: Camera Smartphones

According to Honor, that design takes inspiration from the ARRIFLEX 35, one of the cameras that helped establish ARRI’s cinema camera lineup. 

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

Google Pixel 11 vs iPhone 17: Which Flagship Phone Should You Buy?

By
Joane
-

On paper, the Pixel 11 and iPhone 17 look like evenly matched rivals. In practice, they make very different trade-offs. The Pixel 11 bets on camera versatility, battery life and Google’s AI-driven experience, while the iPhone 17 leans into raw performance, video and polish. For buyers spending flagship money, choosing between them comes down to which strengths matter most.

Major Features:

CategoryGoogle Pixel 11iPhone 17Winner
Display6.3-inch OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits peak6.3-inch LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, 3000 nits peakApple — Sharper display, LTPO technology and Dolby Vision
Display ProtectionGorilla Glass Victus 2Ceramic Shield 2, anti-reflective coatingApple — Stronger protection and anti-reflective coating
ProcessorGoogle Tensor G6 (3nm)Apple A19 (3nm)Apple — Stronger flagship performance
RAM12GB8GBGoogle — More RAM for multitasking and AI features
Storage256GB, 512GB, UFS 4.x256GB, 512GB, NVMeGoogle — UFS 4.x storage and more RAM complement its software experience
Rear Cameras48MP + 10.8MP telephoto + 13MP ultrawide48MP + 48MP ultrawideGoogle — Dedicated 5x optical telephoto adds greater versatility
Optical Zoom5xNo dedicated telephotoGoogle — Dedicated optical zoom
VideoUp to 4K 60fps, 10-bit HDRUp to 4K 60fps, Dolby Vision HDRApple — Dolby Vision and advanced video features
Selfie Camera10.5MP ultrawide, PDAF, 4K 60fps18MP multi-aspect, PDAF, Dolby Vision, 4K 60fpsApple — Higher resolution and richer video capabilities
Battery4985mAh3692mAhGoogle — Significantly larger battery capacity
Wired Charging30W50% in 20 minutesGoogle — Higher stated charging power
Wireless Charging25W magnetic, Qi2.225W MagSafe/Qi2Tie — Both support 25W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingReverse wired4.5W reverse wiredGoogle — More charging flexibility with reverse wired charging and bypass charging
BiometricsUltrasonic fingerprint sensorFace IDGoogle — Fingerprint unlocking offers convenient access
Water ResistanceIP68, up to 1.5m for 30 minutesIP68, up to 6m for 30 minutesApple — Higher stated water-resistance depth
ConnectivityWi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 6.0, USB-C 3.2Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, USB-C 2.0Apple — Newer Wi-Fi 7 support
SoftwareAndroid 17, up to 7 major OS updatesiOS 26Google — Explicit seven-generation major OS update commitment
Unique FeaturesPixel AI features, Best Take, Pixel Shift, bypass chargingFace ID, UWB, Dolby Vision, satellite featuresGoogle — More distinctive AI and power-user features
PricePriced around $900 / ₹90,000Priced around $800 / ₹83,000Apple — Lower price with stronger overall performance
OverallCamera versatility, battery and Android flexibilityPerformance, display, video and valueApple — Better all-round package at a lower price
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
PrevNext

1. Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Pixel 11 combines Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both sides with an aluminum frame and IP68 protection. Its design feels familiar but durable, while the ultrasonic fingerprint sensor adds convenient biometric unlocking. The iPhone 17 uses Ceramic Shield 2, an aluminum frame and glass back, with stronger stated water resistance and Face ID.

Both phones look premium, but the iPhone 17 feels slightly more refined thanks to its Ceramic Shield 2 protection and tighter ecosystem integration. The Pixel 11 is more practical for users who prefer fingerprint unlocking and Android’s flexible interface. Neither has a headphone jack, while both feature stereo speakers and modern wireless connectivity. Overall, the Pixel feels more functional, while the iPhone feels more polished.

Also ReadGoogle Pixel 11 Pro XL vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max: Which Flagship Truly Wins?

Display Quality

Both smartphones feature 6.3-inch 120Hz OLED panels with HDR support and 3000-nit peak brightness. The Pixel 11 offers HDR10+ and a 1080p-class resolution, while the iPhone 17 uses a sharper 1206 x 2622 panel with Dolby Vision and an anti-reflective coating. The iPhone also has a higher stated pixel density.

The Pixel’s display should still look excellent for everyday use, streaming and gaming, but the iPhone 17 has the stronger specifications overall. Its sharper panel, Dolby Vision support and anti-reflective treatment make it the more impressive option for multimedia consumption and outdoor viewing.

Verdict

The iPhone 17 wins the display comparison with its sharper panel, Dolby Vision and anti-reflective coating. The Pixel 11 counters with excellent brightness and HDR10+, but Apple’s screen feels more complete.

2. Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 runs Android 17 with Google’s Tensor G6, paired with 12GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. Its hardware is clearly designed around AI features and Google’s software optimization. The iPhone 17 uses Apple’s A19 chip with 8GB RAM and NVMe storage, targeting high performance and efficient iOS integration.

Raw specifications do not tell the entire story here. The A19 should have the edge for demanding workloads, gaming and sustained performance, while the Pixel’s additional RAM suits multitasking and AI-driven features. For users prioritizing conventional flagship performance, the iPhone 17 looks stronger. For Google’s AI-centric software experience, the Pixel 11 is arguably more interesting.

Battery and Charging

The Pixel 11 packs a substantially larger 4985mAh battery and supports 30W wired charging, 25W magnetic wireless charging and reverse wired charging. It also includes bypass charging, which can be useful during extended gaming sessions. The iPhone 17 has a smaller 3692mAh battery but supports wired fast charging and 25W MagSafe or Qi2 wireless charging.

Check Google Pixel 11 Price on Amazon

Capacity alone does not determine endurance, and Apple’s chip and software efficiency can compensate for its smaller battery. Still, the Pixel 11 offers more charging flexibility and a much larger battery reserve. It is the more practical choice for heavy users who value battery capacity and features.

Verdict

The iPhone 17 wins performance, but the Pixel 11 wins battery hardware and charging flexibility. Overall, the Pixel suits heavy users better, while the iPhone remains stronger for demanding performance.

3. Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Pixel 11 takes the more versatile approach with a 48MP main camera, 10.8MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, and 13MP ultrawide. Features such as Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR and Best Take add useful computational photography tools. The iPhone 17 pairs a 48MP main camera with a 48MP ultrawide, but lacks a dedicated telephoto lens.

That gives the Pixel 11 a clear advantage for zoom photography and shooting distant subjects. The iPhone 17, however, offers a stronger video package, including Dolby Vision HDR recording and a wider range of supported frame rates. For everyday photography, both should deliver excellent results, but the Pixel 11’s three-camera setup feels more complete.

Selfie Camera

The Pixel 11 uses a 10.5MP ultrawide selfie camera with PDAF and 4K video recording at up to 60fps. The iPhone 17 steps up to an 18MP multi-aspect front camera with PDAF, Dolby Vision HDR, 3D spatial audio and stereo sound recording.

The iPhone 17 is the stronger choice for selfies, video calls and social-media content, particularly for users who frequently record themselves. Its higher-resolution front camera and advanced video features give it greater flexibility. The Pixel 11 remains capable, but Apple’s front-camera system offers a more feature-rich experience for creators and everyday video use.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 wins for rear-camera versatility with its dedicated 5x telephoto, while the iPhone 17 leads for selfies and video. Overall, Pixel is the better pick for photography flexibility.

4. Pricing

The Pixel 11 is priced around $900 or ₹90,000, while the iPhone 17 is priced around $800 or ₹83,000. That gives the iPhone a meaningful price advantage despite offering a premium build, 120Hz OLED display, A19 processor and strong camera hardware.

Check Apple iPhone 17 Price on Amazon

The Pixel 11 justifies some of its premium through 12GB RAM, a larger battery, a dedicated 5x telephoto camera and 25W magnetic wireless charging. However, those additions may not matter equally to every buyer. The iPhone 17 delivers a broader flagship experience for less money, making it the easier recommendation for value-conscious buyers.

Is the price justified? 

The Pixel 11 makes sense for buyers who specifically want Google’s software, AI capabilities, fingerprint unlocking, longer battery capacity and optical zoom. Those features create a distinctive package rather than simply adding higher specifications on paper. It is worthwhile for users who will actually use those advantages.

The iPhone 17 offers stronger conventional performance, a more advanced selfie system and excellent display technology at a lower price. That combination makes it the better value proposition overall. The Pixel’s premium is easier to justify for photography-focused Android users than for shoppers seeking the strongest all-round deal.

Verdict

The iPhone 17 offers better value at its lower price, combining stronger performance and multimedia features. The Pixel 11 earns its premium through zoom, battery capacity and Google’s software advantages.

Also ReadSamsung Galaxy S26 FE vs Google Pixel 11: Is Pixel Worth $200 More?

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

5. Conclusion

The Pixel 11 stands out with its Tensor G6 platform, 12GB RAM, 5x optical telephoto camera, ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, large battery, bypass charging and Google-centric AI experience. It is the more distinctive choice for Android users who value photography flexibility and practical power-user features.

The iPhone 17 counters with the A19 chip, Face ID, Ceramic Shield 2, Dolby Vision, an 18MP multi-aspect selfie camera and MagSafe or Qi2 charging. Its combination of performance, display quality and video capabilities makes it the more rounded mainstream flagship. For buyers who prioritize speed and polished content creation, the iPhone has the stronger overall package.

Verdict

The iPhone 17 is the overall winner, thanks to stronger performance, a sharper display, better selfie and video capabilities, and a lower price. The Pixel 11 is the better alternative for zoom photography, battery capacity, and Android flexibility.

FAQs

1. Is Pixel 11 better for photography than iPhone 17?
Yes. Its dedicated 5x telephoto makes the Pixel 11 more versatile for zoom and distant subjects.

2. Which phone is faster, Pixel 11 or iPhone 17?
The iPhone 17 is faster overall, particularly for demanding apps, gaming and sustained performance.

3. Does Pixel 11 have better battery life than iPhone 17?
The Pixel 11 has a much larger battery, making it the stronger choice for heavy users.

4. Which phone offers better value for money?
The iPhone 17 offers better value, combining flagship performance and features with a lower starting price.

5. Should you buy Pixel 11 or iPhone 17?
Choose Pixel 11 for camera versatility and battery capacity; choose iPhone 17 for performance, video and overall value.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

Global Vivo X500, X500 Pro, and X500 Pro Max clears SIRIM certification before launch

By
Rajesh Regmi
-

Vivo is set to launch the X500 series in China on September 21st, and the countdown has come with a steady stream of certification sightings for the global versions. We’re now getting a fresh batch, with all three models turning up on Malaysia’s SIRIM database.

Also ReadVivo X500 series roundup: Specs, leaks, and launch details

The base Vivo X500, carrying model number V2619, has already been certified on SIRIM, IMDA, and TUV. Joining it now are the X500 Pro Max (model V2610) and X500 Pro (model V2621).

Vivo X500, X500 Pro, X500 Pro Max SIRIM certification

A SIRIM listing doesn’t reveal much about the phones themselves. It’s mainly a regulatory requirement for electronics sold in Malaysia, so the latest filings mostly confirm the model numbers and show that Vivo is preparing the X500 series for the Malaysian market.

Vivo X500 series rundown 

Vivo confirmed the X500 series launch date at its Creator Festival event in Yantai, where it also shared some details about the phones’ cameras. The X500 Pro models will be the first to use Vivo’s new BluePrint LightGuard 900 sensor, which is reportedly based on the Sony LYT-910. Vivo says the sensor can deliver up to 17EV of dynamic range.

The Pro models will also support 4K video recording at 240fps for slow-motion footage, along with 4K 120fps HDR video and 10-bit 4:2:2 encoding.

Vivo has also shown what the phones will look like. An official image of the X500 Pro Max shows a large circular camera module on the back, with the rear panel gently sloping around it. The Pro Max comes in black and orange, while official images of the full lineup reveal additional color options for all three models.

Vivo X500 Pro Max
Vivo X500 Pro Max

The lineup is also expected to use a 64MP Sony LYT-610 sensor for the telephoto camera. Vivo is reportedly pairing it with CIPA 5.5-rated stabilization and support for a 200mm teleconverter accessory.

Also ReadTop 5 upcoming smartphone launches in September 2026

As for when you’ll be able to buy one outside China, there’s no word on that yet. Certification runs like this one usually show up weeks before an official global announcement, so expect the pace of these filings to pick up as September 21st gets closer.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Via)

OnePlus 16 might not launch in any international market at all

By
Rajesh Regmi
-

The OnePlus 16 has been on shaky ground for the Indian market for some time, and a new leak suggests what OnePlus could offer instead. According to tipster Yogesh Brar, the OnePlus 16R could become the brand’s top phone in India next year, followed by the Nord series in the mid-range and the N series at the budget end.

OnePlus 16 alleged render

If the tip is accurate, India may not get a numbered OnePlus flagship next year, breaking from how OnePlus has run things in India for years, when a numbered flagship shipped alongside its R-series counterpart. For those unaware, the R-series traded the top chipset and camera hardware for a bigger battery and a lower price.

Also ReadBest OnePlus Phones of 2026

OnePlus R-series is usually a rebrand of Chinese models

The R-series itself has followed an interesting path. The OnePlus 12R was based on the China-exclusive OnePlus Ace 3, while the OnePlus 13R followed a similar approach with the OnePlus Ace 5. The pattern changed with the OnePlus 15R, which was based on the OnePlus Ace 6T instead of continuing from the Ace 5 series.

That makes it difficult to predict which China model could become the OnePlus 16R. OnePlus has yet to reveal anything about the Ace 7 series, so there is currently no clear model to link it to.

OnePlus 16 not launching in India

Meanwhile, the numbered OnePlus 16 is still expected to launch in China. It’s tipped to carry a 9,000mAh battery, the largest yet on a OnePlus flagship, and earlier leaks suggest a price hike over the OnePlus 15 in its home market. 

Skipping India would carry more weight this time around, too. OnePlus has already pulled out of North America and Europe, so if it leaves the OnePlus 16 out of India as well, the phone ends up as a China-exclusive device with no major market outside its home turf.

Also ReadTop 5 upcoming smartphone launches in September 2026

However, those details may not matter much for Indian buyers if the OnePlus 16 remains exclusive to China. Nothing has been confirmed by OnePlus yet. The company has not commented on a possible change to its Indian lineup. Brar has a solid track record with OnePlus leaks, but for now, the leak should be treated with caution.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Source)

Casio launches five stylish MTP-E735AR watches with a surprisingly premium look

By
Soumyakanti
-

Casio has added a new line of analog watches to its global catalog. The MTP-E735AR series, which appeared on the company’s international website earlier this month, is a set of five quartz watches featuring integrated stainless steel bracelets and patterned dials. The watches are expected to launch in various markets, though Casio has not yet shared official pricing or exact availability details.

Casio MTP-E735AR watches
Edited (MTP-E735AR-2A2V)

Design Details

The design of the MTP-E735AR incorporates an integrated bracelet, a style where the watch case transitions directly into the metal band. The case is made of stainless steel with a brushed silver-tone finish. It measures 44.5mm lug-to-lug, 37.5mm across, and 8.4mm thick, resulting in a relatively compact and thin profile for everyday wear. The total weight of the watch with the stainless steel band is 89 grams.

Casio MTP-E735AR watches
Casio MTP-E735AR watches

For the dial, Casio is using an arabesque-style motif rather than a standard flat or sunburst finish. The swirling pattern covers the entire face and is paired with stylized hour markers. The series includes five color variants: black (MTP-E735AR-1AV), deep blue (2A1V), pale ice blue (2A2V), turquoise blue (2A3V), and white (7AV).

Casio MTP-E735AR watches
Casio MTP-E735AR watches

Four of the models use silver-tone hands and indices that match the case hardware. The white-dial variant uses blue hands and markers to maintain legibility against the lighter background.

Internally, the watches rely on a standard Casio quartz movement. They run on an SR920SW battery, which the company states will last for approximately three years before needing a replacement. The movement has an accuracy rating of ±20 seconds per month and includes a traditional three-hand timekeeping setup.

For daily utility, there is a day and date window positioned at the 3 o’clock mark. The day display is bilingual and can be toggled between English and Arabic. The dial is covered by standard mineral glass, and the case has a water resistance rating of 50 meters (5 bar). This rating means the watch can handle brief water exposure or surface swimming, though it is not intended for diving.

While pricing remains unconfirmed, the use of mineral glass and a basic quartz movement indicates that the MTP-E735AR series will likely be positioned as an entry-level option when it reaches retailers later this fall.

In related news, Casio has recently launched three premium G-Steel GST-W1000 watches with a slimmer steel design, alongside two new 90s-inspired Baby-G BG-169 watches in the US.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Casio 1,2,3,4,5)

Citizen brings its GPS-syncing premium Attesa CC4084-83Z watch to the US

By
Soumyakanti
-

Citizen has updated its US storefront to include the Attesa CC4084-83Z, bringing the titanium watch to the US market. The company initially launched the watch in the UK earlier this week alongside the CC4085-81Z. While the CC4084-83Z was missing from the initial US rollout, it is now available to purchase directly from the manufacturer for $2,295.

Citizen Attesa CC4084-83Z watch

Design Details

Check Citizen Attesa CC4084-83Z Price on Amazon

The Attesa line focuses on autonomous timekeeping and power management. The CC4084-83Z operates on Citizen’s F950 caliber movement, which integrates the company’s Eco-Drive technology. This system charges the watch’s internal battery using ambient light, including standard indoor office lighting and natural sunlight, which eliminates the need for manual charging or physical battery replacements.

For time synchronization, the watch relies on Satellite Wave GPS. Rather than connecting to a smartphone via Bluetooth or receiving local radio tower signals, the watch communicates directly with GPS satellites. This allows the device to detect its location and automatically adjust to the correct local time zone anywhere in the world. The F950 movement also powers a perpetual calendar, dual time zone tracking, and standard chronograph features.

Citizen Attesa CC4084-83Z watch

The watch features a 44.6mm case. To offset the weight typical of larger watches, Citizen uses titanium for both the case and the matching link bracelet. The metal is finished in a dark gunmetal color and treated with a Diamond-Like Carbon (DLC) coating to improve everyday scratch resistance.

Also ReadBest Titanium Watches Under $500 in 2026

Visually, the dark gunmetal hardware is paired with a green world-time bezel and a green-and-black dial. The layout includes gold-tone accents, prominent hour markers, and three sub-dials, resulting in a technical, aviation-inspired design.

The watch features an anti-reflective sapphire crystal and offers water resistance up to 100 meters, making it suitable for swimming and showering. Citizen is limiting global production of the CC4084-83Z to 1,500 unnumbered pieces.

In related news, Citizen has recently launched a rugged Eco-Drive field watch with a military-inspired design.

Shop Citizen Eco-Drive watches on Amazon

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Citizen)

iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone Duo supports 60W charging; but your 96W MacBook charger is incompatible

By
Debasish
-

Apple has taken a fair amount of flak over the years for how slowly its iPhones charge compared with a lot of Android phones that happily hit 100W or more. The new iPhone 18 Pro and 18 Pro Max finally speed things up a bit, but there’s a familiar catch if you want the full benefit.

Apple says the 18 Pro series can hit 50% in about 15 minutes. That’s roughly a quarter faster than the iPhone 17 Pro, which needed around 20 minutes for the same top-up. A quick five-minute charge is also claimed to give you about six hours of video playback. The improvement comes from higher peak power delivery.

Also ReadiPhone Duo vs iPhone 18 Pro Max: $2,000 Foldable or Smarter Buy?

Here’s the catch: you need a charger that supports peak 60W, USB Power Delivery 3.1, and Adjustable Voltage Supply (AVS). Apple’s own 40W Dynamic Power Adapter (which can output up to 60W) plus a compatible USB-C cable will get you those advertised speeds. Higher-wattage MacBook chargers, the 96W or 140W ones, don’t qualify because they lack the adjustable voltage feature. Plenty of popular third-party options over 40W, like some Anker 45W adapters, will still charge the phone, but they usually max out at the previous generation’s roughly 20-minute mark for 50%.

As usual, there’s no power adapter in the box, just a USB-C cable, so if you want the fastest wired speeds you’ll need to buy the Dynamic Power Adapter separately. Wireless charging gets a boost too: with a MagSafe charger and any 35W (or higher) adapter, you can reach 50% in about 30 minutes.

🔌 You’ll NeedThere’s no charger in the box, and only Apple’s 60W-capable adapter unlocks the fastest wired speeds. Check Apple 40W Dynamic Power Adapter price on Amazon →

The upcoming foldable iPhone Duo, expected next month, supports the same faster speeds under the exact same conditions, so again you’ll need the right adapter for peak performance. It’s a welcome improvement, but the fact that the brand’s own higher-wattage MacBook chargers are not fully compatible with the 18 Pro series continues that long-running pattern of gating the top experience behind official accessories.

Check iPhone 18 Pro Price on Amazon

The good news is that Adjustable Voltage Supply isn’t some Apple-only proprietary standard. It’s an open protocol defined by the USB-IF, so any charger or power bank that properly supports PD 3.1 or newer should be able to deliver the peak power.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Creative launches B3 gaming soundbar with 20W peak power, Bluetooth 6.0 & RGB lighting

By
Soumyakanti
-

Creative has launched a new desktop soundbar in China, the Creative B3, which is currently listed on JD.com. The soundbar has a standard retail price of 429 yuan ($64), with an initial launch price set at 339 yuan ($50).

Creative B3 Soundbar

Creative B3 Soundbar Specifications

Shop Creative soundbars on Amazon

Inside the 420mm-wide unit, the B3 features a four-driver acoustic system. It uses a symmetrical two-way design, pairing two 58mm bass drivers with two 40mm high-frequency drivers. This configuration separates the low and high frequencies to maintain audio clarity during media playback and gaming.

Creative B3 Soundbar

The system is managed by an Actions Semiconductor audio chipset with a 32-bit processing core and a DSP programmed for gaming audio. It has a frequency response range of 20Hz to 20kHz and delivers a peak output of 20W. The power output is divided into 4W for the left and right channels, and 6W for each of the two subwoofer channels.

The soundbar supports Bluetooth 6.0, utilizing a wireless transmission chip designed to reduce audio latency and keep game audio synchronized with on-screen visuals. Alongside the wireless option, the rear panel includes ports for USB-C, optical, and 3.5mm AUX connections.

Creative B3 Soundbar

This allows the B3 to connect to PCs, macOS devices, smartphones, and TVs. It is also compatible with the PlayStation 5 and Nintendo Switch, though it requires users to switch the soundbar to a dedicated console mode for those systems.

Also ReadThe Best Soundbars of 2026

For voice communication, Creative included a built-in omnidirectional microphone with noise-reduction capabilities to filter out background noise during multiplayer sessions.

Creative B3 Soundbar

On the front panel, a spherical control unit combines a rotary dial and touch controls. This hub manages power, volume, media playback, and the circular RGB lighting, which can be disabled entirely via a dedicated button. The control dial also allows users to switch between four EQ presets. The B3 measures 420 x 87 x 87.4mm and weighs 1.28kg, fitting under most standard monitors.

Also ReadBest Bluetooth speakers in 2026

In related news, check out our roundup of the best soundbars of 2026.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(JD)

Xiaomi launches Redmi A27U 2027 monitor with 4K 120Hz, 90W USB-C & dedicated Apple color mode

By
Soumyakanti
-

Xiaomi is currently taking pre-orders in China for a new desktop monitor, the Redmi Monitor A27U Type-C 120Hz 2027. It costs 1,699 yuan (about $253), making it a relatively affordable option for people who want one screen that can handle both daily work and gaming.

Redmi Monitor A27U Type-C 120Hz 2027

Redmi Monitor A27U 2027 Specifications

Shop Redmi monitors on Amazon

The monitor uses a 27-inch 4K IPS panel with slim bezels on three sides. It has a standard 1500:1 contrast ratio and a typical brightness of 400 nits, which meets the basic DisplayHDR 400 certification.

Instead of sticking to a single refresh rate, it offers a dual-mode setup. For regular desktop use and content creation, it runs at its native 4K resolution at 120Hz. If you want to play games and prefer higher frame rates over resolution, you can switch it to a 1080p mode that runs at 240Hz.

Redmi Monitor A27U Type-C 120Hz 2027

For color, the screen covers 100% of the sRGB gamut and 98% of DCI-P3. Xiaomi says each monitor is calibrated at the factory to ensure an average Delta E of less than 1. If you use a Mac, there is a specific M Mode designed to match Apple‘s Display P3 color output. This should help keep colors looking consistent when you plug in a MacBook or iPad.

To reduce glare from windows or office lights, the screen has an anti-reflective coating that Xiaomi says brings overall reflectance down to 2.6 percent. It also includes standard eye-care features, like DC dimming to prevent screen flickering and a hardware-level blue light filter certified by TÜV Rheinland.

Also ReadBest Budget Gaming Monitors Under $200 (2026)

You can connect a laptop to the monitor using a single USB-C cable, which handles video and data while providing up to 90W of power to keep your computer charged. The back of the monitor also includes two HDMI 2.1 ports, one DisplayPort 1.4, two USB 2.0 ports for basic accessories, and a standard headphone jack.

Redmi Monitor A27U Type-C 120Hz 2027

The included stand lets you adjust the height, tilt, and swivel, and you can rotate the screen vertically into portrait mode. The monitor is available for pre-order in China now and comes with a three-year warranty.

In related news, AOC has recently launched a new 49-inch ultrawide curved gaming monitor with a 240Hz QD-OLED panel and 90W USB-C charging. BenQ has also introduced a new 27-inch gaming monitor featuring a 1440p QD-OLED panel with a 240Hz refresh rate.

Also ReadBest budget gaming monitors (August 2026)

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(JD)

Google Pixel 11 Pro vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Which Phone Gives You More Value?

By
Joane
-

Google Pixel 11 Pro and OPPO Find X9 Pro take very different approaches to the premium Android phone. The Pixel focuses on computational photography, clean software, long-term updates, and Google’s custom Tensor platform, while OPPO pushes hardware with a huge battery, faster charging, and an unusually capable 200MP telephoto camera.

This comparison matters because both phones sit around the same flagship price range, yet prioritize different strengths. The Pixel 11 Pro looks more appealing for software longevity and photography, while the Find X9 Pro is built for buyers who want maximum hardware value. The better choice ultimately depends on whether refinement or raw hardware flexibility matters more.

Major Features:

CategoryGoogle Pixel 11 ProOPPO Find X9 ProWinner
Design & BuildGlass front/back, aluminum frame, IP68Glass front/back, aluminum frame, IP68/IP69OPPO — stronger water resistance
Display6.3-inch LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3600 nits peak6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 3600 nits peakOPPO — larger display and broader HDR support
PerformanceTensor G6, 12GB/16GB RAMDimensity 9500, 12GB/16GB RAMOPPO — more powerful hardware configuration
StorageUp to 1TB, UFS 4.xUp to 1TB, UFS 4.1OPPO — UFS 4.1 storage
Main Camera50MP, f/1.7, OIS50MP, f/1.5, OISOPPO — wider f/1.5 aperture
Telephoto48MP, 5x optical zoom200MP, 3x optical zoomOPPO — higher-resolution telephoto
Ultrawide48MP, 123°50MP, 120°OPPO — higher resolution
Selfie Camera42MP ultrawide, PDAF50MP, PDAFOPPO — higher resolution
VideoUp to 8K at 30fpsUp to 4K at 120fps, Dolby Vision, LOGGoogle — 8K recording
Battery4,850mAh7,500mAhOPPO — much larger battery
Wired Charging30W80WOPPO — much faster charging
Wireless Charging25W magnetic, Qi2.250WOPPO — higher wireless charging speed
Software SupportAndroid 17, up to 7 major OS updatesAndroid 16, up to 5 major OS updatesGoogle — longer software support
Unique FeaturesUWB, Satellite SOS, bypass charging, Qi2.2IR port, IP69, reverse wireless chargingGoogle — more distinctive ecosystem features
PricePriced around $1,100 / ₹120,000Priced around $1,000 / ₹100,000OPPO — lower price
OverallBetter software longevity and 5x zoomBetter battery, charging and hardware valueOPPO — better overall value
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
PrevNext

1. Design and Display

Build and Feel

Both phones use premium glass construction with aluminum frames and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection on the front. They also offer IP68 water and dust resistance, while the Find X9 Pro adds IP69 protection for greater resistance to high-pressure water jets. Both feature ultrasonic in-display fingerprint sensors and stereo speakers. The OPPO feels more feature-packed from a durability perspective, although the Pixel’s design remains more understated and cohesive.

Also ReadOPPO Find X9s Pro vs Pixel 10 Pro: Which One Is Actually Worth It?

The Pixel 11 Pro also offers UWB, which expands its potential for device tracking and ecosystem features. OPPO counters with an infrared port, making the Find X9 Pro more useful as a universal remote. Neither phone has a headphone jack. For everyday flagship use, both are well equipped, but OPPO delivers a slightly broader hardware feature set.

Display Quality

The Pixel 11 Pro has a 6.3-inch LTPO OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and up to 3,600 nits peak brightness. Its higher pixel density should produce exceptionally crisp text and images, while adaptive refresh rates help balance smoothness and efficiency. It is particularly well suited to users who prefer a compact flagship screen.

The Find X9 Pro counters with a larger 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display supporting Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 1 billion colors, and 3,600 nits peak brightness. Its 2,160Hz PWM dimming can also be easier on sensitive eyes. For movies and gaming, OPPO’s larger canvas feels more immersive, while Pixel wins for compact usability.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro wins the display section for its larger panel, Dolby Vision, richer format support, and high-frequency PWM dimming. Pixel remains preferable for buyers who value a smaller flagship screen.

2. Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 Pro uses Google’s Tensor G6, built on a 3nm process, paired with up to 16GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. Its seven-core design is optimized around Google’s software and AI workloads rather than headline specifications alone. The phone should therefore feel particularly well integrated for everyday tasks, photography processing, and Pixel-exclusive AI features.

The Find X9 Pro uses the 3nm Dimensity 9500 with an octa-core CPU, Arm G1-Ultra graphics, up to 16GB RAM, and faster UFS 4.1 storage. On paper, its configuration is more performance-oriented and better suited to demanding gaming and sustained workloads. OPPO has the stronger hardware proposition here, especially for users who prioritize raw performance.

Check OPPO Find X9 Pro Price on Amazon

Battery and Charging

Battery capacity is one of the biggest differences. The Pixel 11 Pro packs a 4,850mAh battery with 30W wired charging and 25W magnetic wireless charging. It also supports reverse wired charging and bypass charging. Google’s software optimization should help, but the charging hardware is conservative for a modern flagship.

OPPO dramatically raises the bar with a 7,500mAh silicon-carbon battery, 80W wired charging, and 50W wireless charging. It also supports 10W reverse wireless charging. The difference is substantial in practical terms, giving the Find X9 Pro much greater endurance potential and faster top-ups. OPPO clearly feels more practical for heavy users.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro wins comfortably, combining a much larger battery with 80W wired and 50W wireless charging. Pixel’s charging features are useful, but OPPO offers substantially better hardware value.

3. Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Pixel 11 Pro combines a 50MP main camera, 48MP 5x periscope telephoto, and 48MP ultrawide. Google adds features such as Best Take, Zoom Enhance, Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR, and multi-zone laser autofocus. The long 5x optical zoom is particularly useful for distant subjects and complements Pixel’s computational photography approach.

The Find X9 Pro uses a 50MP f/1.5 main camera, 200MP 3x periscope telephoto, and 50MP ultrawide. Its large telephoto sensor and high resolution give it considerable cropping flexibility, while Hasselblad color calibration and LOG video target enthusiasts. OPPO has the more ambitious camera hardware, but Pixel’s processing could produce more consistently polished results.

Selfie Camera

Google equips the Pixel 11 Pro with a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera featuring PDAF and 4K video recording at up to 60fps. The wider field of view makes it particularly useful for group selfies and video calls, while autofocus should improve consistency compared with fixed-focus alternatives.

OPPO uses a 50MP wide selfie camera with PDAF, a 21mm equivalent field of view, and 4K recording at up to 60fps. It offers strong hardware on paper, while gyro-EIS adds stabilization for video. OPPO’s higher-resolution sensor is appealing, but Pixel’s ultrawide framing gives it greater flexibility. Both are strong selfie systems.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 Pro wins for computational photography and its versatile 5x zoom, while OPPO offers stronger camera hardware. For predictable point-and-shoot results, Pixel has the edge.

4. Pricing

The Pixel 11 Pro is priced around $1,100 or ₹120,000, while the OPPO Find X9 Pro is priced around $1,000 or ₹100,000. That gives OPPO a meaningful price advantage despite offering a larger battery, faster charging, and a 200MP periscope telephoto camera.

Check Google Pixel 11 Pro Price on Amazon

The gap becomes more significant when the hardware is considered as a package. Pixel’s premium is easier to understand if long-term software support, Google’s ecosystem, and computational photography are priorities. However, buyers primarily comparing specifications get considerably more hardware from OPPO for less money. On pure hardware value, the Find X9 Pro looks difficult to beat.

Is the price justified? 

The Pixel 11 Pro can justify its higher price through seven major Android updates, Google’s software experience, AI features, and camera processing. Those advantages matter to buyers intending to keep a phone for many years rather than upgrading frequently.

The Find X9 Pro offers five major Android updates, which is still substantial, but falls behind Google’s commitment. However, its stronger charging system, enormous battery, premium camera hardware, and broader feature set make its lower price especially compelling. OPPO delivers more physical hardware for the money, while Pixel makes a stronger case through software longevity.

Verdict

The OPPO Find X9 Pro offers better value for money, thanks to its lower price and substantially stronger battery and charging hardware. Pixel earns its premium through software longevity and camera processing.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

5. Conclusion

The Pixel 11 Pro stands out with seven major Android updates, Tensor G6 processing, UWB, satellite SOS, magnetic Qi2.2 wireless charging, and Google’s computational photography features. Its 5x periscope also gives it a different imaging strategy from OPPO’s high-resolution 3x telephoto. It is the more software-focused flagship, designed around Google’s ecosystem and long-term ownership.

Also ReadPixel 11 Pro XL vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Battery, Camera and Performance Compared

The Find X9 Pro answers with a 7,500mAh silicon-carbon battery, 80W wired charging, 50W wireless charging, IP69 protection, an IR blaster, and a 200MP periscope camera. Its hardware package is unusually aggressive for the price. For demanding users, frequent travelers, gamers, and anyone prioritizing endurance, OPPO offers more immediately useful hardware.

Verdict

Overall winner: OPPO Find X9 Pro. Its bigger battery, faster charging, versatile camera hardware, stronger durability, and lower price make it the more compelling all-round flagship. Pixel 11 Pro remains the better choice for long-term software support and computational photography.

FAQs

1. Which phone has the better camera, Pixel 11 Pro or Find X9 Pro?
The Pixel 11 Pro offers stronger computational photography, while OPPO provides more ambitious camera hardware and a 200MP telephoto.

2. Is the Pixel 11 Pro faster than the Find X9 Pro?
The Find X9 Pro has the stronger performance-focused chipset configuration, making it the better choice for demanding workloads and gaming.

3. Which phone has better battery life?
The Find X9 Pro should deliver longer battery life thanks to its significantly larger 7,500mAh battery.

4. Which phone offers better value for money?
The Find X9 Pro offers better value with a lower price and a stronger overall hardware package.

5. Should you buy the Pixel 11 Pro or Find X9 Pro?
Choose the Pixel for software longevity and Google’s camera processing; choose OPPO for battery, charging, performance, and hardware value.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

Pixel 11 Pro XL vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Battery, Camera and Performance Compared

By
Joane
-

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL and OPPO Find X9 Pro take different approaches to the premium Android phone. Pixel emphasizes computational photography, clean software, and long-term updates, while OPPO pushes hardware with a huge battery, faster charging, and a 200MP telephoto camera. The comparison matters for buyers deciding whether Google’s software experience or OPPO’s hardware advantage is more compelling.

Major Features:

CategoryGoogle Pixel 11 Pro XLOPPO Find X9 ProWinner
Display6.8-inch LTPO OLED, 120Hz, 3600 nits peak6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, 3600 nits peakOPPO — Dolby Vision and broader HDR support
Build & DurabilityGorilla Glass Victus 2, aluminum frame, IP68Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glass back, aluminum frame, IP68/IP69OPPO — Stronger IP69 protection
PerformanceTensor G6, up to 16GB RAM, UFS 4.xDimensity 9500, up to 16GB RAM, UFS 4.1OPPO — More performance-focused chipset and storage
Battery5115mAh7500mAh silicon-carbonOPPO — Much larger battery
Charging45W wired, 25W wireless80W wired, 50W wirelessOPPO — Faster wired and wireless charging
Main Camera50MP50MPGoogle — Stronger computational photography
Telephoto48MP, 5x optical zoom200MP, 3x optical zoomGoogle — Greater native optical reach
Ultrawide48MP50MPOPPO — Higher-resolution ultrawide
Selfie Camera42MP ultrawide, PDAF50MP wide, PDAFOPPO — Higher-resolution selfie sensor
VideoUp to 8K at 30fpsUp to 4K at 120fpsGoogle — Higher maximum video resolution
Software UpdatesUp to 7 major OS updatesUp to 5 major OS updatesGoogle — Longer update commitment
Unique FeaturesQi2.2 magnetic charging, UWB, Satellite SOSIR port, IP69, 10W reverse wireless chargingGoogle — More distinctive software and connectivity features
PricePriced around $1300 / ₹135,000Priced around $1000 / ₹100,000OPPO — Lower price for stronger hardware
OverallSoftware-focused flagshipHardware-focused flagshipOPPO — Better overall hardware-to-price balance
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
PrevNext

1. Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Pixel 11 Pro XL combines Gorilla Glass Victus 2 with an aluminum frame and an IP68 rating, giving it a familiar premium flagship design. OPPO uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the front, a glass rear, aluminum frame, and stronger IP68/IP69 protection. Both offer ultrasonic fingerprint readers and stereo speakers, but OPPO feels more practically equipped for demanding everyday use.

Also ReadGoogle Pixel 11 Pro vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Which Phone Gives You More Value?

Display Quality

The Pixel has a slightly larger 6.8-inch LTPO OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and up to 3600 nits peak brightness. OPPO counters with a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display supporting Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, and 2160Hz PWM. Pixel’s higher resolution is appealing, while OPPO’s broader HDR support makes its screen more versatile.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro edges the display and durability category with IP69 protection, Dolby Vision, and an excellent AMOLED experience. Pixel remains compelling for sharper resolution and Google’s polished display tuning.

2. Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 Pro XL uses Google’s Tensor G6, paired with up to 16GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. OPPO uses the Dimensity 9500, also reaching 16GB RAM, with faster UFS 4.1 storage. OPPO’s flagship MediaTek chip looks stronger for demanding performance, while Pixel’s Tensor advantage lies more in Google’s AI-focused software integration.

Battery and Charging

This is where OPPO pulls decisively ahead. Its 7500mAh silicon-carbon battery supports 80W wired and 50W wireless charging, alongside 10W reverse wireless charging. Pixel’s 5115mAh battery supports 45W wired and 25W magnetic wireless charging, plus bypass charging. OPPO offers substantially more endurance and faster charging, making it the more practical choice for heavy users.

Check OPPO Find X9 Pro Price on Amazon

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro wins the specifications and battery section. Its Dimensity 9500, UFS 4.1 storage, massive 7500mAh battery, and faster charging create a stronger hardware package.

3. Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Pixel’s triple-camera system pairs a 50MP main camera with a 48MP 5x periscope and 48MP ultrawide. OPPO uses a 50MP main sensor, 200MP 3x periscope, and 50MP ultrawide. Pixel offers greater native telephoto reach, while OPPO’s enormous 200MP telephoto sensor promises stronger detail and cropping flexibility. For versatile zoom photography, both are unusually well equipped.

Selfie Camera

The Pixel features a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera with PDAF and 4K video recording, while OPPO uses a 50MP wide selfie camera with PDAF and 4K recording. Pixel’s wider perspective can suit group shots and framing, but OPPO’s higher-resolution sensor gives it a stronger hardware advantage. Pixel’s image processing could still make the real-world comparison closer.

Verdict

Pixel 11 Pro XL wins for its 5x optical telephoto and established computational photography approach. OPPO is the more exciting hardware package, particularly for users who prioritize detailed zoom and camera versatility.

4. Pricing

The Pixel 11 Pro XL is priced around $1300 or ₹135,000, while the OPPO Find X9 Pro is priced around $1000 or ₹100,000. That creates a significant gap between two premium phones with broadly comparable flagship ambitions. Pixel asks buyers to pay more for Google’s software ecosystem and longer update commitment.

Check Pixel 11 Pro XL Price on Amazon

Is the price justified? 

Pixel’s premium is easier to justify for buyers who prioritize seven major Android updates, Google’s AI features, Pixel photography, and a clean Android experience. OPPO offers substantially more battery capacity, faster charging, stronger storage, and an impressive 200MP telephoto for less money. For hardware-focused buyers, OPPO clearly offers better value.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro is the stronger value choice. Its lower price combined with a larger battery, faster charging, and impressive camera hardware makes the premium paid for Pixel harder to justify.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

5. Conclusion

The Pixel 11 Pro XL stands out with seven major OS updates, Tensor G6, Google’s computational photography, 5x optical zoom, magnetic Qi2.2 charging, UWB, and Satellite SOS. OPPO counters with a 7500mAh silicon-carbon battery, 80W charging, 50W wireless charging, IP69 protection, an infrared port, and a 200MP periscope. Each targets a different definition of a flagship.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro is the overall winner. It delivers stronger hardware, dramatically better battery endurance, faster charging, excellent cameras, and lower pricing, making it the more complete value-focused flagship.

FAQs

1. Which phone has the better camera, Pixel 11 Pro XL or OPPO Find X9 Pro?
The Pixel excels at computational photography, while OPPO offers impressive zoom hardware and greater sensor resolution.

Also ReadOPPO Find X9 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL: Camera, Performance, Pricing Compared

2. Is the OPPO Find X9 Pro faster than Pixel 11 Pro XL?
Yes. Its Dimensity 9500 is better suited to demanding gaming and sustained performance.

3. Which phone has better battery life?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro should last longer, thanks to its substantially larger 7500mAh battery.

4. Is Pixel 11 Pro XL worth the higher price?
It can be for buyers prioritizing Google’s software, AI features, camera processing, and longer update support.

5. Which phone should you buy overall?
Choose OPPO for hardware and value; choose Pixel for Google’s software experience and computational photography.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

iPhone Duo vs Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate: Apple vs the Wildest Foldable Yet

By
Joane
-

iPhone Duo and Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate are not simply two expensive foldables chasing the same idea. They represent two very different answers to the question of what a folding phone should become. The Duo turns a familiar iPhone into a larger, book-style device, while Huawei takes the concept much further with a tri-fold design that opens into a 10.2-inch tablet-like screen. That makes this comparison especially interesting for buyers who want more than another premium smartphone.

Also ReadiPhone Duo vs iPhone 18 Pro Max: $2,000 Foldable or Smarter Buy?

The choice is also less obvious than the price tags suggest. The iPhone Duo brings Apple’s A20 Pro chip, 120Hz OLED displays, advanced video recording and a tightly integrated iOS experience. Huawei counters with a larger canvas, 16GB RAM, a 5600mAh battery, faster charging and a three-camera system with a dedicated periscope lens. The real question is not which phone has more technology. It is which approach makes more sense when the novelty wears off.

Major Features:

CategoryiPhone DuoHuawei Mate XT 2 UltimateWinner
DesignTitanium frame, Ceramic Shield, IP68, stylus supportTri-fold design, IP58/IP59, stylus supportHuawei — more innovative tri-fold design
Inner Display7.6-inch LTPO OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision10.2-inch LTPO OLED, 90HzHuawei — much larger tablet-style canvas
Cover Display5.4-inch LTPO OLED, 120Hz6.5-inch LTPO OLED, 120HzHuawei — larger external screen
Display BrightnessUp to 3000 nits peakNot specifiedApple — significantly higher stated peak brightness
PerformanceApple A20 Pro, 12GB RAMKirin 9050 Pro, 16GB RAMApple — stronger flagship performance platform
StorageUp to 2TBUp to 1TBApple — offers twice the maximum storage
Main Camera48MP wide + 48MP ultrawide50MP wide + 50MP periscope + 40MP ultrawideHuawei — more versatile triple-camera setup
Optical ZoomNo dedicated telephoto3.5x periscope telephotoHuawei — dedicated optical zoom camera
VideoUp to 4K 120fps, Dolby Vision, ProRes, spatial videoUp to 4K 60fps, HDR VividApple — much stronger video capabilities
Selfie CamerasUnder-display + 12MP cover cameraDual 8MP camerasApple — higher-resolution cover camera
BatteryLi-Ion, fast wired charging5600mAh silicon-carbonHuawei — larger battery capacity
Wired Charging50% in 20 minutes66WHuawei — faster charging hardware
Wireless Charging25W MagSafe/Qi250WHuawei — twice the stated wireless charging speed
SoftwareiOS 27HarmonyOS 7.0Apple — stronger ecosystem and software integration
ConnectivityWi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, UWB, satellite featuresWi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, infrared portApple — broader premium connectivity features
DurabilityIP68IP58/IP59Apple — stronger water and dust resistance
PricePriced around $2,000 / ₹3,00,000Priced around $2,800 / ₹2,80,000 based on supplied figuresApple — stronger overall value proposition
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
PrevNext

1. Design and Display

Build and Feel

The iPhone Duo feels like Apple’s attempt to make folding technology disappear into a conventional iPhone experience. Its titanium frame, Ceramic Shield protection and IP68 rating give it the sort of premium durability buyers expect from a flagship. More importantly, the hinge and subtle inner crease make the foldable format feel less experimental. Stylus support adds another layer of practicality for notes and creative work.

Huawei takes the bolder route. The Mate XT 2 Ultimate folds in three sections and uses an improved hinge design, while IP58/IP59 protection is a welcome upgrade for such a complex device. Its real appeal, however, is what happens when it opens. Instead of simply becoming a larger phone, it becomes something much closer to a compact tablet. That is the kind of difference that can genuinely change how the device is used.

Display Quality

The iPhone Duo’s 7.6-inch LTPO OLED display is arguably the more polished panel. It supports 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision and up to 3000 nits peak brightness, while the nano-texture and anti-reflective treatment should make the large screen easier to use in bright environments. The 5.4-inch cover display also keeps the 120Hz experience intact.

Huawei’s 10.2-inch LTPO OLED is the spectacle. It offers a 2232 x 3184 resolution, 1 billion colours and 90Hz refresh rate, with a 6.5-inch 120Hz outer display. The lower inner refresh rate is noticeable on paper, but the extra screen real estate is far more consequential for multitasking, documents and video. Huawei wins the size argument; Apple wins the refinement argument.

Verdict

The Mate XT 2 Ultimate has the more exciting display concept, but the iPhone Duo offers the better overall panel experience. Its 120Hz inner screen, higher peak brightness and refined viewing features make it easier to recommend for everyday use.

2. Specifications Including Battery

Performance

Apple’s A20 Pro gives the iPhone Duo the clearest performance advantage on paper. The 2nm chip is paired with 12GB RAM and storage options reaching 2TB. That combination should make demanding games, editing and multitasking feel effortless, while iOS 27 gives Apple greater control over how the foldable hardware and software work together.

Huawei responds with the Kirin 9050 Pro and 16GB RAM, giving the Mate XT 2 Ultimate more memory for its ambitious multitasking setup. That extra RAM makes sense when several apps are being used across the enormous screen. Still, Apple’s chip is the more convincing performance story. Huawei has built the more unusual device, but Apple appears to have built the faster one.

Battery and Charging

Huawei’s 5600mAh silicon-carbon battery is one of the Mate XT 2 Ultimate’s strongest hardware advantages. It supports 66W wired charging, 50W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging. Those numbers matter more here because Huawei is powering a much larger display and a device designed for intensive multitasking.

The iPhone Duo takes a more conservative approach, with wired fast charging and 25W MagSafe/Qi2 wireless charging. Apple’s advantage comes from efficiency and tight hardware-software integration rather than headline charging speeds. For people who regularly top up their phone during busy days, however, Huawei’s charging system is simply more impressive. It feels better matched to the ambition of the device.

Verdict

The iPhone Duo has the stronger performance platform, but Huawei wins battery and charging. For sustained heavy use, the Mate XT 2 Ultimate’s 5600mAh cell and 66W/50W charging setup are hard to ignore.

3. Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The iPhone Duo keeps things relatively simple with two 48MP rear cameras: a main sensor and an ultrawide. That may sound modest next to Huawei’s triple-camera setup, but Apple’s strength is video. The Duo supports 4K recording at up to 120fps, Dolby Vision HDR, ProRes and spatial video, giving it a serious advantage for creators who shoot as much video as they do photos.

Huawei’s hardware is more versatile for photography. Its 50MP main camera has a variable aperture, while a 50MP periscope telephoto provides 3.5x optical zoom and a 40MP ultrawide handles wider scenes. Laser autofocus and a colour-spectrum sensor add further flexibility. For portraits, distant subjects and general photographic experimentation, Huawei has the more interesting toolkit.

Selfie Camera

The iPhone Duo uses an under-display inner selfie camera alongside a 12MP cover camera with autofocus. That makes the internal screen cleaner and keeps the front-facing camera experience consistent with Apple’s broader video focus. It is a particularly sensible solution for a foldable, where a visible camera cutout can become more distracting on a large canvas.

Huawei uses 8MP selfie cameras, including one for the external display. The resolution is considerably lower than the rear cameras, but both support 4K video recording. Huawei’s approach is functional rather than headline-grabbing. For selfies alone, neither phone looks like the main reason to buy it; the rear-camera systems are where this comparison gets genuinely interesting.

Verdict

Huawei wins for camera versatility thanks to its dedicated 3.5x periscope and higher-resolution ultrawide. The iPhone Duo is the better choice for serious video, making the overall camera decision depend heavily on how the phone will be used.

4. Pricing

The iPhone Duo starts at $1,999 for the 256GB model, while higher-storage versions climb significantly further. In India, it is priced around ₹3,00,000. That puts it firmly into luxury-phone territory, but the entry model at least gives buyers access to Apple’s foldable experience without immediately moving into the highest storage tier.

Check iPhone Duo Price on Amazon

The Mate XT 2 Ultimate is priced around ₹2,80,000, while launch pricing varies significantly by market and configuration. Huawei is asking buyers to pay for something few other phones can offer: a device that genuinely transforms from a phone into a large tablet-style display. That makes the comparison more complicated than simply looking at the price difference.

Is the price justified? 

Neither phone is remotely aimed at mainstream value buyers. The iPhone Duo’s premium is easier to defend for users already invested in Apple’s ecosystem, particularly those who value performance, video, software support and a polished foldable experience. It feels like a very expensive iPhone rather than a technology demonstration.

Check Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate Price on Amazon

Huawei’s value proposition is stranger but arguably more exciting. The Mate XT 2 Ultimate combines a huge tri-fold display, 16GB RAM, a large battery, fast wireless charging and a highly versatile camera system. For buyers who will actually use that tablet-sized screen, the hardware premium makes sense. For everyone else, much of that extra technology risks becoming an expensive novelty.

Verdict

The iPhone Duo offers the safer value proposition because its strengths benefit almost every owner. Huawei offers more unusual hardware, but its premium only makes sense if the tri-fold design and tablet-sized display are central to the buying decision.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

5. Conclusion

The iPhone Duo’s biggest strength is how deliberately Apple has approached the foldable format. Its 120Hz displays, A20 Pro chip, advanced video capabilities, nano-texture inner screen and iOS integration make the hardware feel like an extension of the iPhone rather than a completely new category. It also brings a familiar ecosystem advantage that Huawei cannot easily replicate for international buyers.

Also ReadHuawei Pura X Max vs iPhone 17 Pro Max: Is Foldable Finally The Better Choice?

The Mate XT 2 Ultimate is the more ambitious piece of hardware. Its 10.2-inch tri-fold OLED display, optional privacy display, 16GB RAM, 5600mAh silicon-carbon battery, 66W wired charging and 50W wireless charging push the smartphone concept much further. The dedicated 3.5x periscope camera is another meaningful advantage. It is the phone that makes people stop and ask, “How is that even a phone?”

Verdict

The iPhone Duo is the overall winner, but it is far from an easy victory. The Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate is the more ambitious foldable, with a larger tri-fold display, more versatile cameras, bigger battery and faster charging. However, the Duo delivers the stronger all-round smartphone experience with its A20 Pro chip, 120Hz display, advanced video features, IP68 protection, up to 2TB storage and mature iOS ecosystem.

Huawei is the better choice for buyers who prioritise screen size and hardware innovation; the iPhone Duo makes more sense for those who want a premium foldable that feels polished and practical every day.

FAQs

1. Which phone is better for photography, iPhone Duo or Mate XT 2?
Huawei offers more camera versatility, especially for zoom photography, thanks to its dedicated 3.5x periscope telephoto lens.

2. Which phone is faster for demanding apps and gaming?
The iPhone Duo should deliver stronger sustained performance, thanks to Apple’s A20 Pro chip and tight hardware-software optimisation.

3. Which phone charges faster, iPhone Duo or Mate XT 2?
The Mate XT 2 charges faster, supporting 66W wired and 50W wireless charging for quicker top-ups.

4. Is the Mate XT 2 worth its premium price?
It can be, particularly for buyers who will use its tri-fold display, tablet-style multitasking and versatile camera system.

5. Which foldable offers better value for money?
The iPhone Duo offers better overall value, while Huawei makes more sense if its unique tri-fold design is the priority.

Read More:

Nothing OS 5.0 beta rolling out to Phone (4a) Pro, but two upgardes are missing

By
Vicky
-
Nothing Phone 4a Pro

The Nothing OS 5.0 Open Beta rollout went live last month, starting with the flagship Phone (3), and is now expanding to Phone (4a) Pro users. The Android 17-based update brings tons of changes across the software, including a redesigned control center, Lucent themes, expanded lock screen customizations, and new AI features.

The Nothing OS 5.0 beta update for the Phone (4a) Pro has been released a week later than the brand promised earlier. It comes with a total download size of 2.73GB. To get the beta update on your phone, you must first sign up for the beta program. We have a step-by-step guide for this you can find on this page.

Also ReadNothing OS 5.0 roundup: Rollout timeline, supported devices, and major upgrades

What upgrades does Nothing OS 5.0 beta offer to Phone (4a) Pro?

Nothing OS 5.0 Open Beta for Phone 4a Pro

Nothing OS 5.0 is one of the biggest upgrades for Nothing phones in recent years. From new icons to building apps with AI, there are plenty of exciting changes packed into this major upgrade. As for the visual changes, there’s a redesigned Control Center with an iOS flavor, a brand-new theme, a separate notification panel, and upgraded status bar icons and animations.

The lock screen and home screen also receive notable upgrades, including wallpaper-adaptive colors for app icons and quick settings tiles, the Away Time and Collector widgets, Glyph Timer, and improved depth effects.

Nothing OS 5.0 strongly focuses on upgrading the AI capabilities on Nothing phones. It brings an upgraded on-voice engine and enables MCP support. There’s a new Smart Selection feature inside Essential Space that automatically groups, sorts, and organizes your scattered photos and screen captures. Plus, an Essential Apps Builder to allow users to build custom apps using text prompts.

Nothing phones finally receive a dedicated Glyph app, allowing users to control custom lighting animations, ringtone schedules, and sounds. The update package also includes several Android 17 core features, including expanded Dark Mode, cross-platform Quick Share, a floating screen recorder, improved privacy indicator, and isolated audio controls.

Two missing upgrades are coming with a stable release

Nothing OS 5.0 introduces two new clock faces: Gooey and Micrographics. “Gooey” features a bold, playful design and is being rolled out to beta devices, but “Micrographics”, which is inspired by mechanical typography, is still undergoing final development, and so it isn’t available to Phone (4a) Pro just yet.

Nothing has confirmed that the refreshed home screen is also under development.

These two unfinished upgrades will ship with the general release starting in October.

We’ll keep you posted with the latest updates on Nothing OS in our Nothing section. You can also join our Telegram channel to receive instant alerts.

iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

By
Joane
-

The foldable phone battle is getting more interesting as Apple and Samsung take very different approaches to large-screen smartphones. The iPhone Duo focuses on Apple’s ecosystem, display quality, and video capabilities, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra pushes multitasking, cameras, and desktop-style productivity. For buyers spending flagship money, the choice is far from straightforward.

Major Features:

CategoryiPhone DuoSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 UltraWinner
BuildTitanium frame, Ceramic Shield, IP68Armor Aluminum, Gorilla Glass, IP48Apple — Better protection and more premium materials
Inner Display7.6-inch OLED, 120Hz, 3000 nits8-inch AMOLED, 120Hz, 3000 nitsSamsung — Larger display for multitasking
Cover Display5.4-inch OLED, 120Hz6.5-inch AMOLED, 120HzSamsung — More usable outer screen
ProcessorA20 ProSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Apple — Stronger flagship-class silicon
RAM12GBUp to 16GBSamsung — More RAM for demanding multitasking
StorageUp to 2TBUp to 1TBApple — Offers twice the maximum storage
Rear Cameras48MP + 48MP200MP + 50MP + 10MPSamsung — More versatile triple-camera system
Optical ZoomUp to 2x optical-quality3x opticalSamsung — Dedicated telephoto lens
VideoUp to 4K/120fps, Dolby Vision, ProResUp to 8K/30fpsApple — More advanced professional video features
Selfie Cameras12MP cover + under-display10MP cover + 10MP innerApple — More capable cover camera setup
BatteryLi-Ion, fast charging5000mAh, 45WSamsung — Larger specified battery and reverse charging
Wireless Charging25W MagSafe/Qi220W Qi2.2Apple — Faster wireless charging
SoftwareiOS 27Android 17, One UI 9Samsung — Better multitasking and DeX support
Unique FeaturesApple Pencil support, ProRes, MagSafeSamsung DeX, reverse wireless chargingSamsung — More productivity-focused extras
Price in IndiaPriced around ₹3,00,000Priced around ₹1,90,000Samsung — Much better value for money
OverallPremium Apple foldable experienceVersatile productivity-focused foldableSamsung — Better overall hardware and value
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
PrevNext

1. Design and Display

Build and Feel

The iPhone Duo combines a titanium frame with Ceramic Shield glass and offers IP68 protection, giving it a more premium and reassuring construction. Samsung uses Armor Aluminum, Gorilla Glass protection and an IP48 rating. The Galaxy is also notably lighter, which makes it easier to carry and handle throughout the day. Apple’s titanium construction feels more luxurious, while Samsung’s design prioritises practicality. The iPhone Duo also supports a stylus, adding another layer of functionality for compatible workflows.

Also ReadiPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8: Apple Finally Takes on Samsung

Display Quality

The iPhone Duo has a 7.6-inch LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED panel with 120Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision and a nano-texture finish. Samsung counters with a larger 8-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display, 120Hz refresh rate and 3000-nit peak brightness. Both offer anti-reflective treatment, but Samsung’s larger canvas is better suited to multitasking and media. Apple’s display should appeal more to users who value colour, HDR and a premium viewing experience.

Verdict

Samsung wins for productivity thanks to its larger inner display and lighter design. The iPhone Duo counters with stronger water resistance, titanium construction, stylus support and an especially polished display experience.

2. Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The iPhone Duo is powered by Apple’s A20 Pro chip, paired with 12GB RAM and storage options reaching 2TB. Samsung uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, with up to 16GB RAM and 1TB storage. Both are designed for demanding apps and multitasking, but Apple’s chip gives the Duo a particularly strong performance foundation. Samsung’s extra RAM and Android flexibility make the Fold 8 Ultra more appealing for heavy multitasking and desktop-style workflows.

Battery and Charging

Samsung packs a 5000mAh battery and supports 45W wired charging, 20W wireless charging, and 4.5W reverse wireless charging. The iPhone Duo’s battery capacity is not specified here, but it supports 50% wired charging in 20 minutes and 25W MagSafe or Qi2 wireless charging. Samsung clearly has the more versatile charging setup. Reverse charging is also useful for powering accessories, giving the Fold a practical advantage for travellers and power users.

Verdict

The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra wins this section with its larger battery, faster wired charging and reverse wireless charging. The iPhone Duo remains compelling for users prioritising Apple’s high-performance silicon.

3. Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The iPhone Duo uses a dual-camera system with 48MP wide and 48MP ultrawide sensors. It supports advanced video recording, including Dolby Vision HDR, ProRes, and spatial video. Samsung goes further with a 200MP main camera, 10MP telephoto with 3x optical zoom, and 50MP ultrawide. It also records up to 8K. Samsung offers considerably more shooting flexibility, particularly for zoom photography. Apple’s advantage is its extensive professional video toolkit, which makes the Duo more attractive to serious video creators.

Selfie Camera

The iPhone Duo has an under-display selfie camera alongside a 12MP cover camera with autofocus. Samsung uses a 10MP inner ultrawide camera and a separate 10MP cover camera. Apple’s cover camera offers a more capable specification and autofocus, while Samsung gives users greater flexibility between the inner and outer screens. For everyday selfies and video calls, the iPhone Duo’s cover camera looks more versatile. Samsung’s dual-camera approach remains useful when switching between folded and unfolded use.

Verdict

Samsung wins for overall camera versatility with its high-resolution main sensor, dedicated telephoto, and 8K recording. The iPhone Duo is the stronger choice for buyers who prioritise advanced professional video features.

4. Pricing

The iPhone Duo is priced around $2,000 or ₹3,00,000, placing it firmly in ultra-premium territory. The Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra is priced around $2,100 or ₹1,90,000 based on the supplied pricing. That makes Samsung significantly more affordable in India despite its higher approximate US price. For buyers comparing local value, the difference is substantial. The Fold also offers more RAM options, a larger battery and a more elaborate camera system at its Indian price.

Is the price justified? 

The iPhone Duo’s premium can be justified by its titanium build, Apple silicon, advanced display technology, strong video capabilities and integration with the iOS ecosystem. However, the price gap makes Samsung considerably easier to recommend on pure hardware value. The Galaxy combines a bigger display, stronger camera versatility, a larger battery, and DeX support. For buyers focused on features per rupee, Samsung delivers the more convincing package.

Verdict

Samsung is the clear value winner based on the supplied Indian pricing. The iPhone Duo justifies its premium through Apple’s ecosystem, materials, display and video features, but costs considerably more.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

5. Conclusion

The iPhone Duo stands out with its titanium construction, Ceramic Shield protection, IP68 rating, nano-texture foldable display, Apple A20 Pro chip, MagSafe charging and advanced Dolby Vision, ProRes and spatial video capabilities. 

Samsung counters with an 8-inch inner screen, 200MP main camera, 3x optical zoom, 8K recording, a 5000mAh battery, reverse wireless charging and Samsung DeX. Its lighter design also improves everyday practicality. 

The two phones target different definitions of a premium foldable. Apple focuses on ecosystem polish and creator-friendly features, while Samsung leans harder into productivity, versatility and hardware value.

Also ReadiPhone Duo vs iPhone 18 Pro Max: $2,000 Foldable or Smarter Buy?

Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra is the overall winner. Its larger display, versatile cameras, bigger battery, DeX support and substantially lower Indian price make it the more complete foldable package.

FAQs

1. Is the iPhone Duo better for photography?
Samsung offers greater camera versatility, while the iPhone Duo is better suited to advanced video recording.

2. Which phone is faster for demanding apps?
The iPhone Duo’s A20 Pro delivers excellent performance, while Samsung offers more RAM for intensive multitasking.

3. Which foldable has better battery life?
Samsung has the larger 5000mAh battery and supports 45W wired charging, making it the stronger battery-focused choice.

4. Is the iPhone Duo worth its higher price?
It can be for Apple ecosystem users, but Samsung offers considerably more hardware value at its lower Indian price.

5. Which phone should buyers choose overall?
Samsung is the better all-round choice for buyers seeking productivity, camera versatility and stronger value.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

Xiaomi launches HyperOS 4 global beta program for these devices

By
Vicky
-
Xiaomi HyperOS 4 global beta

A month after the HyperOS 4 beta program was unveiled in China, it’s finally expanding to the global markets. Xiaomi has already begun the global beta rollout to three phones, with more scheduled to receive it later this month.

Xiaomi will release the HyperOS 4 global beta update to seven smartphones. The beta recruitment is already live for the first round of devices, which includes Xiaomi 17, Xiaomi 17 Ultra, and Xiaomi Leica Leitzphone. Remaining devices will be eligible for the beta program starting September 17th.

Also ReadNothing OS 5.0 roundup: Rollout timeline, supported devices, and major upgrades

First round (already live)

  • Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • Xiaomi 17
  • Leica Leitzphone powered by Xiaomi

Second round (starting September 17th)

  • Xiaomi 17T Pro
  • Xiaomi 17T
  • Xiaomi 15 Ultra
  • Xiaomi 15

The beta program isn’t being rolled out to all global markets at the same time. It’s currently limited to Global and EEA models, with more regions likely to join in the coming days and weeks.

Xiaomi HyperOS 4 global beta roadmap

The number of seats may be limited, so you must submit your application as early as possible. To apply for the beta program, go to Xiaomi Community > ME > Beta testing > Recruiting test and fill in the required details. If your application gets selected, you’ll soon receive a beta OTA update.

It’s important to note that beta builds are prone to bugs and errors. It’s also recommended to back up your important data before upgrading to HyperOS 4 beta. There won’t be easy going back, though. If you wish to roll back to HyperOS 3, you’ll need to flash the device.

Also Read5 new Android features rolling out in September that you need to know about

We’ll keep updating you with the latest details in our Xiaomi section. You can visit the page regularly or join our Telegram channel to stay updated.

Nothing Headphone (1) Pro tipped to launch September 29 with a three-driver setup including xMEMS

By
Debasish
-

Nothing is getting ready to step up its audio game with a more premium over-ear pair. The Headphone (1) Pro looks like a clear upgrade from their earlier model, aimed at people who want stronger sound and a few more refined features.

According to Dealabs, these should drop on September 29. It’s expected to be priced at €349 in Europe and $399 in the US. They’re coming in the usual black and white, keeping Nothing’s signature semi-transparent look but stepping it up with an aluminum shell and scratch-resistant glass. An IP52 rating means they can handle a bit of dust and light water, which is nice for everyday use.

Also ReadNothing Headphone (a) vs Headphone (1): How the new affordable model compares with the flagship

The big audio jump is a three-driver setup where different drivers handle different frequency ranges. The high-frequency segment reportedly uses xMEMS, a solid-state micro-speaker system built entirely out of silicon, which is interesting.

The headphones also getting tuning help from Metropolis Studios in London (the same place that works on a lot of proper recording and mastering work), plus Hi-Res Audio certification and LDAC support. There’s a Flat EQ option and some more detailed “recording-grade” sound tools if you like tweaking.

On the noise-cancelling side, ten microphones power adaptive ANC, and there’s a transparency mode when you need to hear what’s going on around you. Connectivity covers Bluetooth 6.1 and a proper 3.5 mm jack (still useful). Battery life is claimed at up to 60 hours, with fast charging support.

Overall it feels like Nothing is trying to position this as a more serious, better-sounding version of their existing over-ears: multi-driver sound, studio input, and solid everyday durability. Nothing themselves haven’t officially confirmed specs yet.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Huawei Smart Screen S7 RGB 4K TVs with 55″/65″/75″ sizes now up for pre-order in China

By
Debasish
-

Huawei just opened pre-orders for its new Smart Screen S7 RGB, a smart TV that puts a big focus on better, more accurate colors. The big claim is upgraded backlight tech that should make everyday viewing look richer and more precise. The 55″ model starts at 3,999 yuan (~€513).

The key upgrade is RGB-MiniLED. Instead of the usual single-color backlight, this setup lets red, green, and blue light shine independently. Pair that with a super-focusing lens and you get less screen halo and cleaner, more accurate colors. Huawei says it covers 105% of the BT.2020 color gamut, about 66% more color richness than regular MiniLED TVs, and offers 94-bit color control precision.

A self-developed light-and-color control chip handles the brightness and color of each LED bead in real time. There’s also an AI color calibration algorithm that aims to keep things looking natural and with more depth. It uses a new high-end LCD panel that boosts brightness by 21%. The more efficient lighting and better packaging help with lower power use and heat management.

Also ReadBest Smart TV in 2026

All three sizes are 4K (3840×2160) on an LCD IPS hard screen. They run a native 120 Hz refresh rate, and with double-refresh tech they can go up to 300 Hz if you plug in a PC, console, or other device that actually outputs a 300 Hz signal. The TVs run HarmonyOS 4.3 with 3 GB of RAM and 64 GB of storage.

Audio depends on the size. The 55″ and 65″ models get two 12.5 W full-range speakers in a simple 2.0 setup at the bottom. The 75″ adds a pair of 12.5 W high-frequency speakers on top of that. All of them support Huawei’s Histen sound processing.

Price and availability:

Also ReadBest Mini-LED and 4K TVs under Rs 70,000 in India

There are three sizes: 55″ for 3,999 yuan (~€513), 65″ for 4,999 yuan (~€641), and 75″ for 6,999 yuan (~€898). Pre-orders are already live in China. The series is currently available exclusively in China.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Shop Huawei Smart TVs on Amazon

(Source: Huawei)

Xiaomi launches Mijia Smart Range Hood 3 Max with 1,700 Pa suction, camera and PM2.5 sensor for smart control

By
Debasish
-

Xiaomi just dropped a new flagship range hood that’s basically trying to make kitchen smoke a non-issue. The Mijia Smart Range Hood 3 Max is their most capable smoke-handling appliance yet, and it’s built to suck up fumes fast while using AI to react in real time.

Pre-orders are already open in China. The regular price sits at 5,999 yuan (~€770), but with the national subsidy it drops to 4,599 yuan (~€590). Xiaomi is calling it Mijia’s top smoke-purifying model, and the numbers back that up. Compared with the previous generation you get 34.6% more wind speed, an 89% jump in static pressure, and noise intensity cut by 84%.

Shop Xiaomi Mijia kitchen appliances on Amazon

There’s a four-vortex cyclone that grabs smoke right at the source, a high-speed backward-tilting airflow for those heavy stir-fry moments, and an air curtain that tries to keep the fumes from floating up into your face. Top fan speed hits 17.5 m/s, the highest Mijia has recorded, powered by a 360 W motor and eight “hurricane” suction levels. Max static pressure is 1,700 Pa.

Also ReadThe Best Xiaomi Mijia Gadgets You Can Actually Buy in 2026

A constant air-volume algorithm senses how much resistance the flue is giving and adjusts automatically, so it should still work properly whether you’re on the 1st floor or the 67th.

The smart side is where it gets interesting. A 3MP camera paired with a VLA visual model (trained on more than 100,000 real cooking clips) checks the smoke situation every 0.1 seconds and can change speed within 0.6 seconds. Xiaomi claims over 98% accuracy.

There’s also AI anti-overflow protection: it watches for a pot that’s about to boil over, sounds an alarm, and can even tell a compatible Mi Home cooktop to cut the heat. It keeps an eye on gas and smoke around the clock, has a micron-level PM2.5 sensor with a three-color display, and can push alerts to your phone through the Mi Home app. If it senses you need ventilation, it can turn itself on.

Other practical bits: negative-ion sterilization that Xiaomi says removes 97% of PM2.5 and hits 98% sterilization rates, an oleophobic coating on the impeller plus a smart dry-cleaning mode that doesn’t require taking anything apart, and durability testing equal to 1,680 hours that supports their claim of strong suction lasting ten years. Noise control uses 17 different design tricks and lands at 59 dB(A) on high power.

Also Read7 Unique Xiaomi Smart Home Products You Can Buy in 2026

It launches alongside the new Mijia Timer Gas Stove 3 Max, so Xiaomi is clearly pushing the whole smart-kitchen ecosystem. If you do a lot of high-heat cooking and hate lingering smells or constant filter cleaning, this looks like a big step up in what a connected range hood can do.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source: Xiaomi Youpin)

Lenovo IdeaPad Vibe vs MacBook Neo: Which is the best budget laptop?

By
Rajesh Regmi
-

Lenovo has put its new IdeaPad Vibe in a very interesting spot. It starts at $699.99, exactly the same price Apple now charges for the MacBook Neo after raising its price from the original $599. With both laptops targeting buyers who want a relatively affordable machine, the similar pricing makes the comparison hard to ignore.

Lenovo IdeaPad Vibe vs Macbook Neo

Of course, a spec sheet can’t tell you everything. Keyboard feel, trackpad quality, display tuning, and overall software experience still need to be tested in person. But the specifications already show that Lenovo and Apple are taking very different approaches to the budget laptop market.

Check MacBook Neo Price on Amazon
PrevNext

1. Same price, different approach

Apple’s pitch with the MacBook Neo was always about restraint. You get a 13-inch Liquid Retina display, an A18 Pro chip borrowed from the iPhone 16 Pro, 8GB of unified memory, and a fanless body that starts at 256GB of storage. No upgrades once you buy it, no configuring your way to more RAM later. What you order is what you live with.

Lenovo’s IdeaPad is more flexible. It comes in 14- and 15-inch sizes, with a choice of AMD Ryzen AI 400 or Snapdragon X chips, and RAM that tops out at 32GB on the AMD side versus the Neo’s fixed 8GB. Storage runs up to 1TB, and Lenovo’s sticking dual SSD slots in there so you can add capacity down the line instead of committing upfront. If you’re the type who keeps a laptop for five years and wants room to grow into it, that alone tips things in Lenovo’s favor.

Also ReadThe Best Windows Laptops for Work and Productivity in 2026
Check Lenovo IdeaPad Vibe Price on Amazon

2. More colors, more customization

Apple gave the MacBook Neo a more colorful look than its usual Mac lineup. It comes in Blush, Citrus, Indigo, and Silver, unlike the classic silver and gray finishes on pricer Macs.

Lenovo, meanwhile, offers even more options. It comes in seven Pantone-developed colors including Dreamy Violet and Radiant Coral, and Lenovo also sells interchangeable keycaps separately. It’s a small thing, but it gives the IdeaPad Vibe a more personal look. I

There is one important catch, though. If you want an OLED display, your color choices are limited to Moody Blue and Lowkey Grey. The other finishes come with a 120Hz IPS panel instead. 

3. Lenovo wins on ports

The difference in connectivity is much easier to see. The MacBook Neo has two USB-C ports and a 3.5mm headphone jack. And that’s fine if most of your accessories are wireless or USB-C, but if you have peripherals like monitors, SD cards, and other devices, you’ll definitely need a separate adapter.

The IdeaPad Vibe is much more practical here. It has two USB-A ports, two USB-C ports, HDMI, and a microSD card reader, along with Wi-Fi 7 support. The USB ports are limited to 5Gbps, so this isn’t a laptop designed around extremely fast external storage. But for everyday use, having more built-in ports means fewer dongles to carry around.

4. The Neo is lighter, but Lenovo has a bigger battery

Apple still has an advantage when it comes to weight. The MacBook Neo weighs 1.23kg, while the 14-inch IdeaPad Vibe starts at 1.3kg. The Neo also has a 36.5Wh battery, which Apple claims delivers up to 16 hours of video playback. 

Lenovo hasn’t published an official battery-life rating yet, but the AMD version can be equipped with a battery as large as 65Wh. That doesn’t automatically mean it will last longer than the Neo, since battery life also depends heavily on the processor and software, but the larger capacity gives Lenovo some room to work with.

The webcams also favor Lenovo. The Neo uses a 1080p FaceTime HD camera without a physical privacy shutter. The IdeaPad Vibe has a 5MP IR camera with a privacy cover and Windows Hello support. 

5. Performance is still the big unknown

This is the one area where it’s difficult to conclude without actually testing the laptops. Apple’s A18 Pro is already a known quantity, and the company’s close control over its hardware and software means the Neo’s 8GB of memory doesn’t necessarily tell the whole story. For browsing, writing, streaming, and other everyday tasks, it should be more than capable.

Lenovo’s Ryzen AI 400 and Snapdragon X options are also promising, particularly for users who want more RAM and on-device AI capabilities. With up to 32GB of memory, the IdeaPad Vibe also has a clear advantage for heavier multitasking.

Still, processor performance isn’t something you can judge from core counts and memory numbers alone. Cooling, software optimization, battery settings, and the difference between Windows and macOS all matter.  

Apple is also reportedly working on a MacBook Neo successor with an A19 Pro chip and more RAM for next year, so the current Neo is unlikely to remain the company’s entry-level MacBook for long.

6. Which one makes more sense?

The MacBook Neo is still the simpler option. If you’re already using an iPhone and other Apple devices, want a lightweight laptop, and mainly need something for browsing, writing, streaming, and everyday work, the Neo is a no-brainer. 

On the other hand, the IdeaPad Vibe is more flexible with more ports, more RAM, more storage options, two SSD slots, larger screen choices, and far more customization. Those things become more useful if you plan to keep the laptop for several years.

The biggest catch is the display and color trade-off. If OLED matters to you, you’ll have to choose between just two IdeaPad Vibe colors. Lenovo’s AMD models are expected to arrive in October, while Snapdragon versions are scheduled for November. 

Until both laptops have been properly tested, it’s too early to say which one is faster or better overall. But at the same $699.99 starting price, the IdeaPad Vibe clearly offers more flexibility on paper, while the MacBook Neo keeps things simple. Which approach makes more sense will mostly depend on whether you value Apple’s simpler experience or Lenovo’s upgradeability and wider range of hardware options.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

1...345...5,263Page 4 of 5,263
Gizmochina
Gizmochina brings you the best of tech from China and around the globe!
© 2025 Gizmochina | All rights reserved | If you buy something via one of our affiliate links, Gizmochina may earn a commission.