For a long time, smart speakers were mostly used for setting kitchen timers, checking the weather, or casually turning off the lights. While the hardware steadily improved, the voice assistants inside them often struggled with anything beyond basic, rigid commands. This year, however, the landscape has noticeably shifted. The major tech companies have started integrating generative AI and large language models into their audio hardware, making these devices much better at understanding natural conversation.

Apple, Google, Amazon, and Sonos have all updated their lineups for 2026. The focus is no longer just on audio quality, though that remains important. Instead, the updates center on visual intelligence, built-in networking features, and voice assistants that can actually follow a train of thought. If you are looking to update your home audio setup this year, here is a look at the best smart speakers currently available.

Apple HomePod Mini 2

Apple’s original HomePod Mini remained largely unchanged for years, but the new HomePod Mini 2 brings some much-needed updates, primarily through the introduction of Siri AI. Built on Apple’s Foundation Models, the updated assistant is noticeably better at handling conversational requests.

It can recognize up to six different voices in a household and pull context from your personal devices, meaning you can ask it to find a recipe a friend texted you, and it will actually know what you are talking about.

On the hardware side, Apple added a feature called Sound Glow. The flat touch panel on the top of the speaker now illuminates and pulses with colors that match the album artwork of the music you are playing. It is a nice visual touch for a device that otherwise looks very similar to its predecessor.

Audio performance remains solid for its 3.3-inch size, and Apple has added a new home theater feature: if you own the latest Apple TV 4K, you can now link four HomePod mini 2 speakers together for a surround sound setup. It is a logical choice if your home is already built around the Apple ecosystem.

Price: $149

Google Home Speaker

Google has moved away from the Nest Audio branding, consolidating its smart home efforts under the new Google Home Speaker. Priced at $99.99, this device serves as the primary hardware for Google’s Gemini for Home AI.

The main benefit of the Gemini integration is flexibility. You no longer have to speak in strict command formulas. You can give the speaker a multi-step request, or even change your mind in the middle of a sentence (for example, asking it to turn on the living room lights, but then correcting yourself to ask for the kitchen lights instead), and it will understand.

It also retains short-term conversational memory, so you do not have to repeat the wake word for follow-up questions. The speaker itself is wrapped in a 3D-knit fabric made from recycled materials and features an underglow light ring to indicate when it is listening. It also supports Matter and Thread 1.3, allowing it to serve as a central hub for a Google-based smart home.

Price: $99.99

Amazon Echo Studio with Home Camera

Amazon has taken a different approach with the new Echo Studio with Home Camera. It retains the high-end audio hardware of the standard Echo Studio, including a high-excursion woofer, Dolby Atmos support, and room adaptation technology that adjusts the equalizer based on your room’s acoustics. The notable change is the addition of a built-in camera.

This camera gives Alexa visual context. You can hold up a product, like a box of cereal, and ask Alexa to reorder it, or show it a board game and ask for a summary of the rules. It also functions as a basic security camera, allowing you to check in on your room through the Alexa app when you are not home.

Amazon has also confirmed a future update that will let the speaker pair with compatible Fire TVs for video calls. Priced at $249.99, it is a niche device that offers a glimpse of how smart speakers could evolve with visual awareness of their surroundings.

Price: $249.99

Amazon Echo Dot 2026

While the Echo Studio focuses on new camera features, the 2026 Echo Dot is built entirely around household utility. Amazon has added a built-in eero Wi-Fi extender to the device, which can add up to 1,000 square feet of coverage to an existing eero mesh network. It also functions as a smart home hub right out of the box.

Internally, the new Echo Dot runs on Amazon’s custom AZ3 silicon, which includes an AI accelerator designed to process voice commands locally. This helps the speaker filter out background noise and respond to requests a bit faster.

Amazon claims the new model delivers 50% more bass than its predecessor. Priced at $99.99, it is a practical choice for those who want to extend their Wi-Fi coverage while adding smart home controls.

Price: $99.99

Sonos Play

Sonos continues to focus on audio fidelity and multi-room integration with the new Sonos Play. Designed to be a versatile entry point into the Sonos system, the Play functions as both a standard home speaker and a portable Bluetooth speaker. It supports over 100 streaming services directly through the Sonos app, including Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, and Tidal.

While on your home Wi-Fi, it supports Apple AirPlay 2 and Spotify Connect, and it features both Sonos Voice Control and Amazon Alexa for hands-free commands. When you leave your network, it seamlessly switches to Bluetooth 5.3 for offline listening.

It comes with a charging base for everyday indoor use, but you can pick it up and take it outside thanks to its built-in battery, which lasts up to 24 hours. It has an IP67 rating, meaning it is fully dustproof and waterproof, and it even includes a USB-C port that can be used to charge your phone.

The audio is powered by three class-H digital amplifiers and uses Sonos’ Trueplay technology to automatically tune the sound to your environment using its built-in microphones.

It is the most expensive speaker on this list, but it offers a lot of flexibility for people who want one device that works just as well in the living room as it does in the backyard.

Price: $299

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

The post The Best Smart Speakers in 2026 appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google’s Pixel 11 is down to just $699 on Amazon US right now. That’s $200 off the $899 it launched at in August, and it’s the lowest price the phone has hit so far. This isn’t a one-model sale, either. The Pixel 11 Pro, Pro XL, and Pro Fold are all discounted.

The deals run until November 8. All colors get the same price.

The discounted prices

How good are these prices??

Pretty good! Amazon ran Pixel 11 deals during its October Prime event, but those prices were higher than today’s. Back then, the Pixel 11 was $749, the Pro was $849 and the Pro XL was $999. Every one of them is $50 cheaper now, and you don’t need Prime this time.

The Pro Fold is the bigger surprise. It has sat at or near its full $1,899 price since launch, so $250 off is its first real cut.

Which one should you get??

Pixel 11 ($699) is the one most people should buy. You get the same Tensor G6 chip as the Pro phones, a 6.3-inch screen, IP68 water and dust protection, and Google says the battery lasts more than 30 hours. Wired charging gets you to about 55% in 30 minutes. At $699 it undercuts most flagship phones by a wide margin, and remember, it gets the same seven years of updates as the Pro models.

Check the Pixel 11 on Amazon

Pixel 11 Pro ($799) is the best value here. It’s only $100 more than the regular Pixel 11 right now, which is a smaller gap than usual. For that you get the better camera system, with a larger telephoto sensor that pulls in 30% more light, plus Pixel HiLight: the back of the phone glows when your favorite contacts call while it’s lying face down. If you care about photos, this is the one.

Check the Pixel 11 Pro on Amazon

Pixel 11 Pro XL ($949) is the Pro with a bigger 6.8-inch screen. Google rates its zoom at up to 120x, the longest on any Pixel. It also has the largest discount in the sale, at $350 off.

Check the Pixel 11 Pro XL on Amazon

Pixel 11 Pro Fold ($1,649) opens up to an 8-inch screen that’s great for video and split-screen work. Google made the back from a new composite material thats lighter and reportedly much harder to crack, and says the new hinge is three times stronger. It’s still a lot of money, but this is the first time it’s been this cheap.

Check the Pixel 11 Pro Fold on Amazon

Worth knowing

• These are unlocked models. They work with Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, Google Fi and most other US carriers.
• The 256GB Pixel 11 is the smallest storage size Amazon sells. There’s no 128GB model to trade down to.
• With the holidays close, you probably won’t see these prices drop much further before Black Friday for the new series. Prices tend to land at about the same level then.

Prices were checked on October 30, 2026. Amazon prices can change at any time.

Read more

• Top Android Phones With 7 Years of Updates
• Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold keeps most of the last generation, but it’s $100 more expensive
• Google Pixel 11a renders leak, and the price may surprise you

For daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories.

The post Google’s Pixel 11 drops to $699 on Amazon US, and the rest of the lineup is on sale too appeared first on Gizmochina.

OnePlus 16 and Google Pixel 11 appeal to different flagship buyers. One prioritizes high-end performance, an exceptionally fast display, and massive battery capacity, while the other focuses on Google’s software experience, computational photography, and long-term updates. Both are priced around the $900 mark, making the choice less about affordability and more about which features deliver the greatest everyday benefits.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The OnePlus 16 combines Crystal Shield Glass, an aluminum frame, and a choice of glass or glass-fiber reinforced plastic for its rear panel. Its IP68/IP69K rating provides stronger protection against dust and demanding water exposure than the Pixel’s IP68 certification. The Google Pixel 11 uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both sides, paired with an aluminum frame for a familiar premium finish. Both offer ultrasonic fingerprint sensors, but OnePlus provides greater flexibility with physical SIM configurations and eSIM support on compatible variants. The Pixel’s more compact design makes it appealing to buyers who prefer comfortable everyday handling.

Display Quality

The OnePlus 16 features a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED panel with a 185Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, and Ultra HDR support. Its higher refresh rate makes it particularly attractive for competitive gaming and exceptionally fluid scrolling. The Pixel 11 counters with a 6.3-inch OLED display, a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and a higher quoted peak brightness of 3,000 nits. Both screens should deliver vibrant colours, but OnePlus offers more advanced display capabilities, while Google prioritizes brightness and manageable screen size.

Verdict

The OnePlus 16 wins for display technology, refresh rate, and water resistance. The Pixel 11 is better suited to buyers who prefer a smaller screen.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The OnePlus 16 uses Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, built on a 2nm process, paired with an Adreno 850 GPU. Its flagship-oriented hardware, UFS 4.1 storage, and configurations offering up to 16GB of RAM make it the stronger candidate for demanding games, intensive multitasking, and sustained performance workloads. The Google Pixel 11 relies on Google’s Tensor G6 chipset, manufactured using a 3nm process, alongside an IMG graphics processor and up to 12GB of RAM. Tensor’s strengths centre on Google’s AI features and software integration rather than outright gaming performance. Both run Android 17, but Google’s promise of seven major OS updates gives the Pixel a clearly defined long-term support advantage.

Battery and Charging

The OnePlus 16 packs a substantial 9,000mAh silicon-carbon battery, supported by 100W wired and 50W wireless charging. It also offers reverse wireless charging, reverse wired charging, and bypass charging for supported gaming scenarios. The Pixel 11 has a 4,985mAh battery, 30W wired charging, and 25W magnetic wireless charging with Qi2.2 support. OnePlus is considerably better equipped for extended gaming, heavy workloads, and buyers who dislike frequent charging. Google’s magnetic charging ecosystem is convenient, but its slower wired charging and smaller battery make the OnePlus the more compelling option for endurance.

Verdict

The OnePlus 16 wins decisively with its faster chipset, greater memory flexibility, and substantially larger battery. The Pixel 11 stands out for its seven-update commitment.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The OnePlus 16 features a 200MP main camera with optical image stabilisation, a 50MP telephoto camera offering 3x optical zoom, and a 50MP ultrawide camera. Its versatile setup supports 8K recording, 4K video at up to 120fps, Dolby Vision, and LUT previews, giving enthusiasts greater flexibility for photography and video creation. The Google Pixel 11 combines a 48MP stabilised main camera with a 10.8MP telephoto lens offering 5x optical zoom and a 13MP ultrawide camera. Google’s computational photography tools, including Best Take and Pixel Shift, help produce polished images with minimal editing. OnePlus offers more versatile video capabilities and higher-resolution sensors, while the Pixel’s longer optical zoom provides an advantage for distant subjects.

Selfie Camera

The OnePlus 16 features a 50MP ultrawide front camera with autofocus, HDR, and 4K recording at up to 60fps. Its wider framing is particularly useful for group selfies, travel photography, and creators who record themselves regularly. The Pixel 11 uses a 10.5MP ultrawide selfie camera with autofocus and 4K recording at up to 60fps. Although its resolution is lower, Google’s image processing can help maintain natural-looking skin tones, balanced exposure, and consistent results across different lighting conditions. OnePlus offers more hardware flexibility, but Google’s processing remains attractive for users who prefer ready-to-share photos without extensive adjustments.

Verdict

The OnePlus 16 wins for camera hardware, selfie resolution, and video flexibility. The Pixel 11 remains appealing for computational photography and its 5x optical zoom.

Pricing

The OnePlus 16 is priced around $900 (₹86,000), while the Google Pixel 11 is priced around $900 (₹90,000). These approximate prices place both smartphones in the premium flagship segment, where buyers expect strong performance, capable cameras, and dependable everyday usability. The OnePlus 16 offers configurations with up to 16GB of RAM and 1TB of storage, providing more flexibility for users who manage large games, media libraries, or demanding applications. The Pixel 11 offers up to 12GB of RAM and 512GB of storage. Actual retail prices will vary by market, configuration, taxes, and availability, so regional pricing should be checked before purchasing.

Verdict

The OnePlus 16 offers better overall value at its lower approximate INR price, particularly for performance-focused buyers. The Pixel 11 suits those prioritising software support.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The OnePlus 16 distinguishes itself with a 185Hz LTPO AMOLED display, Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 processor, 9,000mAh silicon-carbon battery, and 100W wired charging. Its 200MP primary camera, 3x optical telephoto lens, and extensive video recording options also make it a strong choice for power users and content creators. 

The Google Pixel 11 takes a different approach, combining Google’s Tensor G6 platform with computational photography features, a 5x optical telephoto camera, magnetic Qi2.2 wireless charging, and seven major Android OS updates. Its more compact screen may also suit buyers who prefer a phone that feels less cumbersome during everyday use.

Both deliver premium features, but their priorities differ considerably. OnePlus focuses on raw hardware capability and charging convenience, whereas Google places greater emphasis on software intelligence, photography processing, and long-term support. The deciding factor is whether immediate hardware advantages or sustained software support matters more.

Verdict

The OnePlus 16 is the overall winner for its superior performance potential, expansive battery capacity, faster charging, more advanced display, and versatile camera hardware. The Google Pixel 11 is the better alternative for buyers who prioritise Google’s photography processing, a compact design, and seven major OS updates. At similar prices, OnePlus delivers the more comprehensive hardware package for most power users.

1. Is the OnePlus 16 better than the Google Pixel 11?

Yes, the OnePlus 16 offers stronger hardware, faster charging, and a more advanced display for demanding users.

2. Which phone takes better photos, OnePlus 16 or Pixel 11?

The Pixel 11 excels in computational photography, while the OnePlus 16 offers higher-resolution sensors and more versatile video recording.

3. Which phone is faster for gaming?

The OnePlus 16 is better suited to gaming, thanks to its flagship Snapdragon chipset, Adreno GPU, and 185Hz display.

4. Which phone has better battery life and charging?

The OnePlus 16 has a 9,000mAh battery and 100W wired charging, giving it a substantial advantage in endurance and charging speed.

5. Which phone offers better value for money?

The OnePlus 16 offers better hardware value, while the Pixel 11 appeals to buyers prioritising software support and Google’s photography features.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• OnePlus 16 vs Vivo X500 Pro: 9000mAh Battery vs Zeiss Cameras
• OnePlus 16 vs iPhone 17: The $900 Flagship Battle Is Closer Than You Think
• OnePlus 16 vs Galaxy S26: Bigger Battery or Smarter Flagship?

The post OnePlus 16 vs Google Pixel 11: Which $900 Flagship Is Worth Buying? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Honor Win RT and Google Pixel 10a take very different approaches to the smartphone experience. One prioritizes flagship-class performance, gaming hardware, and exceptional battery endurance, while the other focuses on computational photography, clean Android software, and long-term updates. Both offer capable cameras and premium display technology, but their differences extend well beyond the usual flagship-versus-midrange divide. Choosing between them depends on whether raw hardware power and endurance matter more than photography, software support, and everyday convenience.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Honor Win RT emphasizes durability and performance with IP68/IP69K protection, scratch- and drop-resistant display glass, and a built-in cooling fan. Its dual Nano-SIM configuration also suits users who prefer two physical SIM cards. The Google Pixel 10a combines a Gorilla Glass 7i front, aluminum frame, and plastic back with IP68 protection. Its simpler construction feels more conventional, while the lighter overall design makes everyday handling more comfortable. Honor’s stronger water-jet protection and integrated cooling hardware give it a more specialized, performance-oriented identity.

Display Quality

Honor’s 6.83-inch AMOLED panel offers a 185Hz refresh rate, HDR Vivid, and a claimed 6,000-nit peak brightness, making it particularly appealing for gaming and fast-moving content. The Pixel 10a features a 6.3-inch P-OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and 3,000-nit peak brightness. Google’s screen remains sharp and responsive for everyday use, but Honor delivers a more immersive viewing experience with smoother motion and greater claimed peak brightness.

Verdict

The Honor Win RT wins for display quality, gaming-focused hardware, and rugged protection. The Pixel 10a is the more practical choice for users who prefer a compact, straightforward design.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Honor Win RT runs on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, a flagship 3nm chipset paired with an Adreno 830 GPU. Configurations reach 16GB RAM and 1TB storage, backed by UFS 4.1. Its built-in cooling fan adds a useful advantage during extended gaming sessions. The Pixel 10a uses Google’s Tensor G4, supported by 8GB RAM and UFS 3.1 storage. It handles everyday apps, photography, and AI-assisted features comfortably, but its hardware is less suited to demanding gaming. Honor offers substantially more performance headroom for power users.

Battery and Charging

Honor’s 10,000mAh silicon-carbon battery is the standout feature, supported by 100W wired charging and 27W reverse wired charging. The enormous capacity should provide a considerable endurance advantage, particularly during gaming and travel. The Pixel 10a has a 5,100mAh battery, 30W wired charging, 10W wireless charging, and bypass charging. Wireless charging adds convenience, while bypass charging can help reduce battery stress during supported plugged-in gaming sessions. Nevertheless, Honor’s much larger battery and faster charging make it the stronger option for users who prioritize extended use.

Verdict

The Honor Win RT wins decisively on processing power, storage flexibility, battery capacity, and charging speed. The Pixel 10a counters with wireless charging and a longer software-update commitment.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Honor Win RT combines a 50MP main camera with optical image stabilization and a 12MP autofocus ultrawide camera. It supports 4K recording at up to 60fps, making it versatile for photography and video. The Pixel 10a uses a 48MP stabilized main camera and a 13MP ultrawide sensor. Google’s computational photography features, including Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR, and Best Take, give it an advantage in image processing and convenient photo editing. Although Honor offers a capable camera setup, the Pixel’s software-led approach is more appealing for users who want consistently polished everyday photographs.

Selfie Camera

Honor equips the Win RT with a 50MP front camera capable of recording 4K video at 60fps. That combination is attractive for creators who record detailed selfies, talking-head videos, or social media content. The Pixel 10a has a 13MP ultrawide selfie camera with 4K recording at 30fps and support for HDR and panorama. Its wider perspective suits group selfies, while Google’s image processing helps deliver natural-looking results. Honor has the stronger front-camera specifications, particularly for video flexibility, but the Pixel remains a compelling option for users who value straightforward, dependable photography.

Verdict

The Google Pixel 10a is the better overall photography choice thanks to Google’s computational imaging. The Honor Win RT wins on selfie resolution and front-camera video flexibility.

Pricing

The Honor Win RT is priced around $380 (₹35,000), positioning it as an aggressive option for buyers seeking flagship performance without flagship-level spending. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, 10,000mAh battery, 100W charging, and advanced display make the hardware package particularly compelling. 

The Google Pixel 10a is priced around $500 (₹50,000), placing it approximately $120 (₹15,000) higher. Its appeal rests on Google’s camera processing, clean Android experience, wireless charging, and promised seven major Android OS updates. Honor offers more raw hardware for the money, while Google’s pricing reflects its software and photography strengths.

Is the price justified?

The Honor Win RT offers better hardware value, especially for gamers and heavy users who benefit from its cooling fan, powerful chipset, and enormous battery. The Pixel 10a’s premium is easier to justify for buyers who prioritize photography, wireless charging, and long-term software support. Neither is universally better value, but Honor delivers considerably more performance-oriented hardware at a lower starting price.

Verdict

The Honor Win RT wins on price-to-hardware value, offering substantially stronger performance and battery specifications for less money. The Pixel 10a justifies its premium through software longevity and photography.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The Honor Win RT stands out with its built-in cooling fan, 185Hz AMOLED display, 10,000mAh silicon-carbon battery, and 100W charging. These features make it an unusual proposition for buyers who want gaming-focused performance and extended endurance without spending on a conventional premium flagship. Its IP68/IP69K protection further strengthens its appeal as a durable, high-performance device. 

The Google Pixel 10a takes a different route with Google’s computational photography, a 13MP ultrawide selfie camera, wireless charging, satellite SOS support, and a commitment to seven major Android OS updates. These features make it more attractive to users who value dependable photography and long-term ownership. The Pixel’s cleaner software experience also offers a more straightforward alternative to Honor’s performance-heavy approach. Ultimately, these phones serve different priorities rather than competing on identical strengths.

Verdict

The Honor Win RT is the overall winner for its dramatically stronger chipset, gaming-focused cooling, superior display specifications, enormous battery, faster charging, and lower price. It delivers more hardware for the money and is the better choice for power users. The Google Pixel 10a remains the smarter alternative for buyers who prioritize computational photography, wireless charging, and seven major Android OS updates.

FAQs:

1. Is Honor Win RT better than Google Pixel 10a?

Yes, for gaming, performance, battery life, and hardware value. The Pixel 10a is preferable for photography and long-term software support.

2. Which phone takes better photos, Honor Win RT or Pixel 10a?

The Google Pixel 10a is better suited to computational photography, with Google’s image processing features helping produce polished everyday photos.

3. Which phone is better for gaming?

The Honor Win RT is better for gaming, thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, 185Hz display, and built-in cooling fan.

4. Which phone has better battery life?

The Honor Win RT should last considerably longer, with its 10,000mAh battery offering nearly twice the capacity of the Pixel 10a’s 5,100mAh battery.

5. Is Honor Win RT better value for money than Pixel 10a?

Yes, for hardware-focused buyers. Priced around $380, the Honor Win RT offers stronger performance and faster charging than the $500 Pixel 10a.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• iPhone 18 Pro vs iPhone 16 Pro: Is It Worth Upgrading?
• Honor Win RT vs POCO F8 Pro: One Has a 10,000mAh Battery, But Which Is Better?
• Honor Win RT vs OnePlus 15R: The Battery Battle OnePlus Could Lose

The post Honor Win RT vs Pixel 10a: Honor’s 10000mAh Battery vs Google’s Camera Magic appeared first on Gizmochina.

Seven years of Android updates are no longer limited to Google and Samsung. Motorola, Honor, and Fairphone have joined them, with newer phones promising long-term software support, giving buyers more options to choose from. 

This list covers recent models rather than older phones that still qualify for extended support, such as the Pixel 8 and Galaxy S24. There is also an important detail to keep in mind when comparing them: the seven-year period starts when a phone first goes on sale, not when you buy it. 

Google counts from the Pixel’s first sale through the US Google Store, while Samsung counts from the first sale date. A phone released several months ago will therefore have less support time remaining than a newer model.

Best overall

The Google Pixel 11 starts at $899 and gets seven years of Android OS upgrades, security updates, and Pixel Drops, with support scheduled to continue through August 2033. 

It ships with Android 17, Google’s Tensor G6 chip, and a Titan M3 security chip. Google also promises seven years of spare parts, giving owners the option to replace components such as the battery rather than buy a new phone when the original starts wearing out.

The phone keeps the familiar 6.3-inch design of its predecessor instead of introducing a major redesign. Its software support is another advantage, as Google delivers Android updates and security patches directly without waiting for a carrier or another manufacturer to approve them.

Best big-screen Pixel

The Google Pixel 11 Pro XL starts at $1,299 for the 12GB/256GB model, making it $100 more expensive than the Pixel 10 Pro XL was at launch. Its larger 6.8-inch LTPO OLED display supports a 120Hz refresh rate and has a claimed peak brightness of 3,600 nits. 

It is powered by a 5,115mAh battery with 45W wired charging, while its rear camera system combines a 50MP main sensor with a 48MP telephoto camera. The Pro models also include Wi-Fi 7 and ultra-wideband connectivity.

As you can guess, software support matches the smaller Pixel 11, with updates scheduled through August 2033. That makes the Pro XL worth considering if you want a larger screen without giving up Google’s full update commitment.

Best premium Samsung

Samsung promises seven years of updates on the Galaxy S26 Ultra, making it eligible for OS upgrades until Android 23—security patches follow suit. Samsung also delivers smaller One UI updates between major Android releases.

The phone has a 6.9-inch display, a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, and an S Pen for writing, drawing, and other tasks. Its privacy display mode limits visibility from off-axis viewing angles, adding another feature for people who regularly use their phones in public. The Galaxy S26 Ultra starts at $1,299.

Samsung launched the phone in February, meaning its seven-year support period began roughly six months before the Pixel 11’s. Its support will therefore end around February 2033, earlier than Google’s August 2033 deadline. Our Galaxy S26 vs S26+ vs S26 Ultra breakdown covers the differences between Samsung’s flagship models.

Best Samsung value

Samsung announced the Galaxy S26 FE in August and began selling it in markets in September. It has a 6.7-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, an Exynos 2500 processor, and 8GB of RAM. A 4,900mAh battery supports 45W wired charging.

The phone runs One UI 9 based on Android 17 and qualifies for seven years of OS upgrades and security patches. Samsung has priced it $50 higher than the Galaxy S25 FE in international markets, but it remains a more affordable way to get Samsung’s extended software support than buying the S26 Ultra.

Best budget

At $499, the Google Pixel 10a is the least expensive phone on this list. It went on sale in March and qualifies for seven years of OS upgrades, security updates, and Pixel Drops, much like the Pixel 11. 

The phone has a 6.3-inch Actua display, a 5,100mAh battery, IP68 water and dust resistance, and Gorilla Glass 7i protection. Much of its hardware carries over from the Pixel 9a, so the extended software support is one of the main reasons to consider it.

Its camera performance is less impressive, however. DxOMark’s testing placed the Pixel 10a below the Pixel 8a and iPhone 15. If camera quality is a priority, we recommend going through reviews before making the decision. 

Best flagship outside the US

The Motorola Signature is the company’s first phone with a seven-year update commitment, covering seven Android OS upgrades and seven years of security patches through early 2033. It starts at €999 in Europe and £899 in the UK, although Motorola does not sell it in the US.

Its specifications include a 6.8-inch display, a Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 processor, and a 5,200mAh battery. It also supports fast 90W wired charging and 50W wireless charging. The phone also carries IP68 and IP69 ratings for protection against dust and water, along with a near-stock version of Android.

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 sits below the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 in the Galaxy S26 Ultra. In Motorola’s defense, the price is lower too. 

Best foldable in Europe

The Honor Magic V6 has a 6.52-inch cover display and a 7.95-inch inner screen, giving it a large display for multitasking when unfolded. It runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and packs a 6,660mAh battery. The phone also carries IP68 and IP69 ratings.

In Europe, Honor sells it in a 16GB/512GB configuration for €2,299.99. The UK price is £1,999.99.

What’s interesting in this case is that Honor commits to seven years of software updates for Magic phones sold in the EU and UK. However, support in other markets depends on the region or market. For instance, Malaysia and Singapore get six years of commitment. 

Google and Samsung also have competing foldables—the Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra. You can also see how the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra compares with the Honor Magic V6.

Best for repairs

Fairphone launched the Fairphone Gen 6+ in August for €649, and you can now buy the smartphone officially in the US too. It ships with 12GB of RAM, a Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 processor, plus the modular design of the Fairphone Gen 6. The device boots on Android 16 and comes with a five-year warranty. The company promises software updates until at least 2033.

As is usual for every Fairphone, its main appeal is repairability rather than raw performance. The replaceable components and long warranty may help owners keep the phone for longer, particularly if they prefer fixing individual parts instead of replacing the entire device.

Which one should you buy?

The best choice depends on how much you want to spend and which features matter most. The Google Pixel 11 series has support scheduled through August 2033, giving it the latest end date among the phones listed here. The standard Pixel 11 is the more affordable flagship option, while the $499 Pixel 10a brings the same seven-year update commitment to a lower price, with some compromises in camera performance.

Samsung’s Galaxy S26 Ultra and Galaxy S26 FE also qualify for seven years of updates. The Ultra is better suited to buyers who want the S Pen and Samsung’s premium features, while the FE provides a more affordable entry point.

Outside the US, the Motorola Signature is another premium Android option, and the Honor Magic V6 brings extended support to foldable phones in Europe and the UK. 

Finally, the Fairphone Gen 6+ is the choice for people who want to repair their phones rather than replace them when a component fails. Whichever model you choose, check the actual support end date and local update policy before buying. Seven years of promised updates can mean different amounts of time remaining, depending on when and where you purchase the phone.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

The post Top Android Phones With 7 Years of Updates appeared first on Gizmochina.

Shopping for a foldable phone in 2026 means looking beyond Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold and Z Flip series. Apple has entered the market with the iPhone Duo, Google has updated its Pixel 11 Pro Fold, and Honor’s Magic V6 brings a 6,660mAh battery to its book-style design. Samsung has also split its Fold lineup, giving buyers a choice between the taller Z Fold 8 Ultra and the wider, shorter Galaxy Z Fold 8.

Each phone approaches the foldable experience a little differently. Some prioritize a large inner display and multitasking, while others put more emphasis on battery life, cameras, or a familiar software experience. There is also a considerable difference in what you’ll pay, particularly if you’re considering Apple’s first foldable or Samsung’s top-end model. 

Here are the five foldable phones worth considering in 2026.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra keeps the tall, narrow design Samsung introduced with last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7, now under a new name. Its 8-inch inner display gives users plenty of room for multitasking, while the 6.5-inch cover screen handles everyday tasks without requiring the phone to be unfolded. Both displays support 120Hz refresh rates, and the inner panel reaches 3,000 nits of peak brightness. Samsung has also added an anti-reflective coating to the inner screen.

The phone runs on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and up to 1TB of storage. It ships with Android 17 and One UI 9, bringing Samsung’s software features to the larger folding display.

Camera hardware is another major part of the package. The rear setup includes a 200MP main camera with 2x optical-quality zoom, a 50MP ultra-wide camera that replaces last year’s 12MP sensor, and a 10MP telephoto camera with 3x zoom. Both displays also have their own 10MP selfie cameras.

Samsung has increased battery capacity to 5,000mAh, up from 4,400mAh on the Fold 7, although charging speeds remain at 45W wired and 20W wireless. The phone weighs 215g and measures 4.1mm thick when unfolded and 8.9mm when folded, keeping its weight close to that of its predecessor.

All of this comes at a high price. In the US, the 12GB RAM and 256GB storage version costs $2,099, while the 512GB model is priced at $2,299. Buyers who need more memory and storage can get the 16GB RAM and 1TB version for $2,699, making it the most expensive phone on this list.

The price also makes durability worth considering. The phone is the first large-screen Samsung foldable to fail JerryRigEverything’s durability test, and Samsung’s official screen replacement prices reach $639 if the inner display is damaged. The launch coverage has the remaining specifications.

Those who prefer a wider, shorter design can save some money with Samsung’s standard Galaxy Z Fold 8. It starts at $1,899.99, weighs 201g, and has a 7.6-inch inner display. Its rear camera system uses two 50MP sensors but lacks a dedicated telephoto lens.

Apple iPhone Duo

Apple’s first foldable gives iPhone users a way to move to a larger screen without leaving iOS. The company unveiled the iPhone Duo on September 9, with pre-orders opening on October 16. Sales begin on October 23 in more than 70 countries and regions, followed by another 28 markets on October 30.

Apple has priced the phone close to Samsung’s premium foldables. The 256GB model costs $1,999, the 512GB version costs $2,199, and the 1TB model comes in at $2,599. At the top of the range, the 2TB version costs $3,199. The starting price is $100 below the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and $100 above the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8. 

The iPhone Duo has a 7.6-inch folding OLED display inside and a 5.4-inch OLED screen on the outside. Both support 120Hz ProMotion and reach 3,000 nits of peak brightness. Apple has also used a nano-texture finish on the inner display to reduce glare. Early hands-on reports suggest the matte finish makes the crease difficult to see, while the selfie camera beneath the display is barely noticeable when not in use.

The frame and hinge cover use grade 5 titanium, with Ceramic Shield glass on the front and back. The phone also has an IP68 rating. However, its build comes with a trade-off: at 254g, it is considerably heavier than Samsung’s standard Galaxy Z Fold 8, which weighs 201g. The iPhone Duo measures 11.3mm when closed and 5.2mm when open.

Apple has made a few other choices worth knowing about before buying. Touch ID is built into the side button, with no Face ID support, and the phone uses eSIM exclusively rather than offering a physical SIM tray. Apple Pencil support is also due later this year.

Powering the phone is Apple’s A20 Pro chip, with a six-core CPU, a seven-core GPU, and vapor chamber cooling. The iPhone Duo runs iOS 27 and has two 48MP rear cameras for main and ultra-wide photography. It supports up to 2x optical-quality zoom but does not include a dedicated telephoto camera. A 12MP front camera handles selfies.

Apple has split the battery between the phone’s two halves and rates it for up to 31 hours of video playback on the inner display or up to 44 hours on the outer display. Fast wired charging can bring the battery to around 50 percent in roughly 20 minutes, and MagSafe wireless charging is supported.

The larger screen also brings changes to iOS. Version 27 adds split-screen apps, drag-and-drop between applications, and saved app pairs, making it easier to use two apps together on the folding display.

Honor Magic V6

For anyone who would rather have a larger battery than a thinner spec sheet, the Honor Magic V6 is worth a look. Its global version packs a 6,660mAh silicon-carbon battery, the largest among the book-style foldables covered here. It supports 80W wired charging and 66W wireless charging, while Chinese versions come with even larger 6,850mAh and 7,150mAh batteries.

The phone also has a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chip paired with 16GB of RAM. Its 7.95-inch inner display runs at 2172 x 2352 resolution, while the cover screen measures about 6.5 inches. On the software side, it uses MagicOS 10 based on Android 16.

Honor has made several claims about the phone’s durability, too. The Magic V6 carries IP68 and IP69 ratings, and its hinge uses steel rated at 2,800MPa. According to Honor, the hinge has been tested for 500,000 folds, while the crease is 44 percent shallower than on the previous Magic V5.

Despite the large battery, the phone remains relatively thin. It measures 4.1mm when unfolded and between 8.8mm and 9mm when folded, depending on the version, with weight ranging from 219g to 224g. 

The camera setup includes a 50MP main sensor, a 50MP ultra-wide camera, and a 64MP periscope telephoto camera with 3x optical zoom and CIPA 6.5 stabilization. Both displays have 20MP selfie cameras. 

Availability is the main hurdle for buyers outside China. Honor does not sell the Magic V6 in the US, and prices in other markets are considerably higher than its Chinese starting price of ¥8,999. In the Philippines, it costs ₱119,999, or roughly $2,140, while the price in South Africa is R40,000. Even at those prices, it can be considerably cheaper than Samsung’s top model. Our comparison with the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra puts the price difference at about $800 in Honor’s favor.

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold

Google’s Pixel 11 Pro Fold takes a different approach from Samsung’s foldables, pairing a large folding display with Google’s version of Android and a long software support commitment. It starts at $1,899 for 256GB of storage, which is $100 more than the Pixel 10 Pro Fold’s starting price. The 512GB model costs $2,019, while the 1TB version is priced at $2,249.

Every configuration comes with 16GB of RAM and Google’s Tensor G6 chip. The phone ships with Android 17, and Google promises seven years of operating system updates, security updates, and Pixel Drops. Buyers can choose between Obsidian and Olive color options.

Google has also reduced the phone’s weight and thickness. At 239g, it is lighter than the previous model’s 258g, while its body measures 10.1mm when folded and 5mm when unfolded. The inner display measures 8 inches, and the cover screen is 6.5 inches. Both reach 3,600 nits of peak brightness, which Google says is about 20 percent higher than on the Pixel 10 Pro Fold.

The Pixel 11 Pro Fold retains an IP68 rating, and Google describes its new construction as three times stronger than the previous generation. Battery capacity has gone in the opposite direction, dropping from 5,015mAh to 4,806mAh. Google still quotes more than 24 hours of battery life, with 30W wired charging capable of reaching 50 percent in 30 minutes. Qi2.2 magnetic wireless charging is also supported at up to 25W.

For photography, the phone has a 48MP main camera, a 10.5MP ultra-wide camera and a 10.8MP telephoto camera with 5x optical zoom. Each display also gets a 10MP selfie camera. Google has added HiLight to the Pixel 11 Pro series, a customizable notification light on the back of the phone.

Our Pixel 11 Pro Fold launch piece details the changes from last year’s model. If you’re deciding between Google’s foldable and Samsung’s wider Fold, our Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs Galaxy Z Fold 8 comparison details their specifications, cameras, and prices.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8

Not everyone needs a tablet-sized screen in their pocket. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 folds a regular-sized smartphone in half, making it a more compact alternative to the book-style models on this list. It starts at $1,199.99, which is $100 more than the Galaxy Z Flip 7.

Samsung has made the new model thinner and lighter than any previous Flip. It weighs 180g and measures 6.1mm thick when unfolded, compared with 6.5mm for the Flip 7. The phone has a 6.9-inch inner display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a 4.1-inch cover screen. Its frame uses Armor Aluminum, and it carries an IP48 rating.

The cover screen gets much of the attention in this generation. Gemini can launch supported tasks directly from the smaller display, while Now Brief shows personalized cards. Users can also create custom cards with text prompts, allowing them to tailor the information displayed without opening the phone.

The hardware changes are more modest. The battery remains at 4,300mAh, with 25W wired and 15W wireless charging. Samsung has also kept the same 50MP main camera and 12MP ultra-wide camera from last year’s model.

The processor depends on where you buy the phone. Some markets get the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, while others receive Samsung’s Exynos 2600. The Galaxy Z Flip 8 runs Android 17 with One UI 9, and Samsung lists support for up to seven major OS updates. As with the other recent Samsung phones, there is no charger in the box, and the phone lacks an SD card slot.

The Galaxy Z Flip 8 went up for pre-order in July and began shipping on August 7. If you’re upgrading from a Flip 7, our Flip 8 vs Flip 7 upgrade piece explains what has changed. The Galaxy Z Flip 8 vs Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 comparison is also worth checking if you’re considering a rival flip with a bigger battery and faster charging.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

The post Top 5 Foldable Phones in 2026 appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google has a new fitness tracker in town, called the Fitbit Edge. It has a display, built-in GPS, up to seven days of battery life, and is available to pre-order for $180 through the Google Store and retail partners, with sales beginning on October 27. Each purchase also includes three months of Google Health Premium.

The Fitbit Edge sits between the screenless Fitbit Air and the Pixel Watch 5. At $180, the Edge gives users a display and dedicated workout features without requiring them to buy a full smartwatch.

Design and fitness tracking

The Fitbit Edge has an 11.5mm-thick case made from recycled aluminum. Google says it weighs 45% less than the Apple Watch Series 12 case, while its Hybrid OLED display provides 46% more viewing area than earlier Fitbit trackers. The screen is also readable in direct sunlight. A redesigned physical side button lets users pause workouts without reaching for the touchscreen.

The tracker supports more than 50 exercise modes, with live information tailored to the activity. Runners can follow pace targets, HIIT sessions show heart rate zones, and track workouts display split times. Google has also upgraded the GPS chipset, claiming up to 40% better tracking accuracy than previous generations. You can leave your phone at home and still track your route, while a built-in altimeter records elevation changes during hill sprints and stair workouts.

You don’t always have to remember to start tracking, either. The Fitbit Edge can automatically recognize and log up to 100 activity types.

Health monitoring and battery life

Beyond workouts, the Fitbit Edge includes Google’s Health Guardian features, which monitor changes in health-related measurements over time. These include blood pressure trends, insulin resistance trends, and alerts for unusually high or low heart rates. Google says the features are intended for general wellness rather than diagnosis, and availability depends on the region.

Google Health Premium subscribers also get access to Google Health Coach, which can explain changes in those patterns, adjust fitness plans, and provide context to discuss with a doctor. The tracker also includes an ECG app, though it isn’t available in every country, along with continuous optical heart rate monitoring.

For sleep and recovery tracking, the Edge combines skin temperature readings with sleep-stage and heart rate variability data to calculate a recovery score each morning.

Google rates battery life at up to seven days on a charge. If you’re running low, the company says five minutes on the magnetic charger provides enough power for a full day of use. The tracker is water-resistant to 50 meters, and Google calls it its first repairable fitness tracker, with a modular internal design and replaceable battery.

Colors and Stephen Curry Special Edition

The Fitbit Edge comes in four finishes, each with an Active Band: Obsidian in matte black, Fog in polished silver, Olive in satin pyrite, and Canyon in warm gold. Google also sells separate Active Sport, Performance Loop, Magnet, and Metal Links bands.

Then there’s also a Stephen Curry Special Edition for $219.99. It has a water-repellent, moisture-wicking band in rye tones with a Game Day Orange accent.

The Google Fitbit Edge works with phones running Android 11 or iOS 16.4 and newer, and requires the Google Health app. Google Health Coach requires a Google Health Premium subscription after the included three-month trial expires.

Google has announced US pricing but hasn’t shared prices for other regions yet. If you’re considering other options, our guide to the best fitness bands in 2026 covers some alternatives.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

The post Google Fitbit Edge launches with a display, ECG, and up to seven days of battery life appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google’s new Googlebook laptops are finally showing up in stores around the world. The pitch is pretty appealing: a more versatile laptop that sits somewhere between Android and ChromeOS, with deeper ties to your phone, native Android apps, and a bunch of AI tools baked in.

These machines run Googlebook OS, which is built mostly on Android tech but borrows some desktop foundations from ChromeOS. That means they can run regular Android apps natively instead of stuffing them in a container.

But not every Googlebook is created equal. Google confirmed to Android Authority that if you go for an Intel (x86) model instead of a Qualcomm Snapdragon (ARM) one, you’ll run into some limits. Most Android apps were built for the ARM chips that live in phones.

Google says 96.6% of the top 10,000-plus most-used apps still work fine on the Intel versions, but a handful of more complex apps and games need developer updates to run properly on Intel hardware. There’s no public list of which ones yet. Three of the five launch models use Intel chips; the Dell and HP ones are the ARM-powered Qualcomm versions.

The tight phone-to-laptop features also come with a requirement: Android 17. Things like browsing your phone’s files from the laptop, picking up tasks mid-flow with Continue On, syncing notifications, or streaming your phone’s screen and apps to the laptop just aren’t available on older Android versions. That’s a bit of a bummer, since the seamless continuity is one of the big selling points Google keeps highlighting, and Android 17 isn’t exactly everywhere yet.

Google is still supporting Chromebooks on their own track. Some newer ones might even get a path to Googlebook OS later. In the meantime, the company is leaning hard on the long software support (up to 10 years), the premium builds, and the AI focus.

If you’re deep in the Android ecosystem and want that tighter phone-laptop link, Googlebooks are an interesting step. Just be picky about the processor if you care about specific demanding apps or games, and make sure your phone is on Android 17 if you want the full continuity package.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source; Android Authority)

The post Googlebook’s highlight features require Android 17 on phone, while Intel (x86) versions might struggle to run some apps appeared first on Gizmochina.

According to tech site OVRPlus, which dug into the GSMA IMEI database, four unannounced Google phones have shown up with new model IDs: Pixel 12 (GC0QU), Pixel 12 Pro (GWU59), Pixel 12 Pro XL (G7U1Y), and Pixel 12 Pro Fold (G4D5D). The listings also include display resolutions.

The three regular models only get small adjustments. The base Pixel 12 is listed at 1080 × 2400; that’s 24 pixels shorter vertically than the Pixel 11’s 1080 × 2424. The Pixel 12 Pro drops to 1280 × 2824 (32 pixels less than 1280 × 2856), and the Pixel 12 Pro XL goes to 1344 × 2952 (40 pixels down from 1344 × 2992).

The horizontal counts stay the same, so it looks like a subtle aspect-ratio tweak rather than any big redesign. We still don’t know the final pixel density or screen sizes, so it’s hard to say how much you’ll actually notice day to day.

The bigger change is on the foldable. The Pixel 12 Pro Fold’s inner display is listed at 2296 × 2404, up from the Pixel 11 Pro Fold’s 2076 × 2152. That’s roughly 10–24% more pixels (depending how you calculate it), which should mean higher density and sharper text and images, especially useful when you’re multitasking in split-screen.

The near-square shape stays the same, so Google seems to be refining its current foldable design rather than switching to the wider, more rectangular layouts some rivals use.

Nothing else is in these listings yet, including the outer-display resolution, battery size, or Tensor chip details. Google is expected to announce the Pixel 12 series in August 2027. As always with early database entries, these numbers could still shift before launch, but right now they give a pretty clear signal that the foldable is getting the most attention on the display front.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Via)

The post Google Pixel 12 Pro Fold tipped for a major display upgrade, IMEI listing reveals appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google could soon have a new Fitbit tracker, and this one looks like a successor to the Charge series. It’s called the Fitbit Edge, according to Android Headlines, and it has a small oval display along with the usual fitness-tracking features. The same device also appeared without a name in Google’s Pixel 11 promotional material back in August.

The Edge would join a Fitbit lineup that already includes both screen-equipped and screenless trackers. The Fitbit Air has no display, while the Fitbit Inspire 3 and Charge 6 already offer screens. 

The difference with the Edge is that it could bring some of the Charge series’ features into a newer design, while adding things like built-in GPS and a small selection of Google apps. Google hasn’t released a new Charge since 2023, so the Edge could be the replacement that has been missing from the lineup.

Why is the Fitbit Edge interesting?

There’s another reason the Edge is interesting. It reportedly works with both Android and iOS, just like other Fitbit trackers. The Pixel Watch 5 is different because it runs Wear OS and only works with Android. This is to say, the Edge could give iPhone users a Google wearable with a display without moving up to a smartwatch from another brand.

The screen itself doesn’t turn the Edge into a smaller Pixel Watch. The leaked information says it can show notifications and supports a limited set of apps, including Google Maps, YouTube Music, and Find My Phone. The comparison material also lists media and music controls. There doesn’t appear to be a full app store, so most things beyond those features would still happen on the phone.

For workouts, the Edge has some useful hardware built in. It reportedly includes GPS, an altimeter for elevation tracking, and automatic activity recognition. The device can last up to seven days.

The design is also quite different from the rectangular Charge 6. It has a round, oval display with an elongated button on either side of the body. The band uses a pinch-style release mechanism on the back, and the puck will be available in Obsidian, Olive, and Canyon. The green and orange versions have two-tone frames, with the orange model having a brighter gold-colored edge.

When it could launch and what it might cost

The Fitbit Edge could arrive this month. Android Headlines expects an October launch, although Google hasn’t announced a date yet. 

Pricing is also unconfirmed. The report estimates between $149 and $199, based partly on previous Charge pricing. The Charge 6 launched at $159.95, while the Fitbit Air starts at $99.99, so that range would put the Edge above the basic tracker without getting into Pixel Watch territory.

For daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Source)

The post Fitbit Edge leaks in photos as Google’s screen-equipped tracker that works with iPhone appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google is officially bringing the Fitbit Air to India. Following its initial global announcement earlier this year in May, the screenless fitness tracker will be available starting October 2nd for Rs. 13,999.

Google Fitbit Air Specifications

The Fitbit Air represents a shift away from standard smartwatch design. Instead of a display, the device consists of a compact sensor module or pebble that fits into various interchangeable bands. By removing the screen entirely, Google is targeting those who want to track their health metrics without the distraction of incoming messages, emails, or app notifications buzzing on your wrist. All data collection happens in the background, and you just need to open the companion Google Health app on your smartphone to view your stats.

Because it lacks a display, the Fitbit Air is significantly smaller and lighter than a typical smartwatch. Google is positioning this as a major advantage for sleep tracking, noting that the device is much less obtrusive to wear overnight. If you are already invested in the Google ecosystem, the company even suggests a dual-device approach: wearing a Pixel Watch during the day and switching to the Fitbit Air at night for a more comfortable fit.

Despite the minimal exterior, the hardware includes a standard array of health sensors. The tracker monitors your continuous heart rate, resting heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), and blood oxygen (SpO2) levels.

It also supports irregular heart rhythm (Afib) notifications and detailed sleep stage analysis. Battery life is rated at up to seven days on a single charge. When the battery does run low, a five-minute fast charge gives you enough power for 24 hours of standard use.

Software integration relies on the Google Health app and Google Health Coach. The system supports automatic activity detection, but it also includes a computer vision feature where you can log your workouts simply by taking a photo of gym equipment or a whiteboard routine. Out of the box, the device comes with a three-month trial of Google Health Premium.

You can pick up the Fitbit Air in one of four colors: Obsidian, Berry, Lavender, and Fog. The standard box includes a recycled material Performance Loop band, though you can purchase a sweatproof Active Band or a more traditional Elevated Modern Band separately to match your daily wear.

Availability

Retail availability includes the Google Store, Flipkart, and physical outlets like Croma, Reliance Digital, and Vijay Sales. At launch, if you use an eligible HDFC or ICICI Bank card, you can take advantage of a Rs. 1,000 cashback offer, alongside no-cost EMI options for up to 12 months.

In related news, Casio has recently launched new F-91WF watches in the US with recycled bands and the same iconic design, alongside new AQ-240E models featuring sleek navy and glossy black retro styling.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

The post Google launches the screenless Fitbit Air in India for Rs. 13,999 appeared first on Gizmochina.

The Google Pixel 11a could arrive in spring 2027 with a higher price than the current model. A new report claims the phone may start at $599, up from the Pixel 10a’s $499 launch price.

The report also gives us the first look at the Pixel 11a’s design. It follows the same overall style as the Pixel 9a and Pixel 10a, with a camera module that sits flush with the rear panel. The module is slightly shorter than before, changing from a longer ellipse to a more compact shape, while the flash remains outside it.

Google Pixel 11a looks the same as its predecessor

The phone is said to measure around 153.46 × 72.35 × 9 mm, which is slightly shorter than the Pixel 10a. It could come in Obsidian, Fog, Olive, and Orchid colors.

In July, a leak revealed the Pixel 11a will be powered by the Tensor G6 chip and MediaTek M90 modem. The latest report backs up those details. Unlike the Pixel 10a, which launched with the Tensor G4, the Pixel 11a is expected to use the same Tensor G6 as the Pixel 11 series. 

The phone is also expected to have a 6.3-inch 1080p display with a 60Hz-120Hz adaptive refresh rate. Peak brightness could reach 3,350 nits, while high-brightness mode may reach 2,250 nits.

Rounding out the specs is a 5,100mAh battery, along with the same 48MP main and 13MP ultrawide cameras. The front camera could get an upgrade to a 10.5MP sensor. The Pixel 11a will also ship with Android 17 and receive seven years of OS, feature, and security updates. 

Google has not confirmed the specifications, price, or launch timing, so these details could still change.

For daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Source)

The post Google Pixel 11a renders leak, and the price may surprise you appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google just made the Chromebook decision a little more complicated. After confirming back in May that it was building an Android-based alternative to ChromeOS, Googlebook is now official, available for pre-order, and set to hit stores on October 4. It’s not a rebrand, either. Google has created a new laptop category with its own operating system, hardware, and features, with prices starting at $899.

The interesting part is that Google isn’t replacing the Chromebook with Googlebook. Both lines are staying around, but they are targeting different sets of users. Chromebooks continue to cover the simpler and more affordable side of Google’s laptop lineup, while Googlebook brings Android, higher-end hardware, and deeper Gemini integration into a more premium package.

So, before you think of Googlebook as simply “the new Chromebook,” here’s a closer look at what actually separates the two.

Two OSes, two different approaches

Chromebooks have always followed a simple formula: open a browser, use cloud-based services, and get on with your work. That hasn’t changed, and it’s one reason you can buy a Chromebook for under $200 and hand it to a student without spending much. Android apps are available on Chromebooks too, but they run inside a separate container. As a result, some apps can still feel like phone software adapted to a larger screen.

Googlebook works differently. It runs Googlebook OS, which combines parts of Android and ChromeOS into a single platform instead of keeping Android apps separate from the main system. Google Play apps are designed to work with a keyboard, mouse, trackpad, and resizable windows. So rather than adding Android apps to a ChromeOS laptop, Google has built Android into the laptop’s operating system.

Gemini goes beyond the sidebar

Chromebook Plus already includes Gemini. You can open the sidebar, enter a prompt, get a response, and return to whatever you were doing. It’s useful, but the AI remains a separate part of the interface.

Googlebook puts Gemini into more of the things you do on the laptop. One example is Magic Pointer, developed with Google DeepMind. It turns the cursor into a way to access Gemini features directly.

Point at a date in an email, for example, and Gemini can offer to schedule a meeting. Select two images, and it can merge or compare them. There’s also Create My Widget, which lets you describe the information you want in a dashboard. You could ask for flight details, hotel bookings, and dinner reservations for a trip, and Gemini can put that information together using Gmail, Calendar, and the web.

Google is also using Gemini Nano v3 on the device for tasks such as file search. This means some tasks, including summarizing a document, can be handled on the laptop without sending the file to the cloud first. Google has already used a similar on-device approach on phones such as the OnePlus 13, and Googlebook brings it to the laptop.

Chromebook users can still access Gemini through Chrome, but it doesn’t have the same level of integration with the operating system.

What you can actually buy, and how much it costs

Pre-orders for the first five Googlebooks are now open, with sales starting October 4. Prices range from $899 to $1,299, with each manufacturer offering a slightly different configuration:

• Acer Googlebook 14 — Priced at $899, it’s the cheapest model and the only 2-in-1 in the lineup. It has a 14-inch 2.8K OLED touchscreen, Intel Core Ultra 5 or Ultra 7 processors, and up to 16 hours of claimed battery life.
• ASUS Googlebook 14 — At $1,299, this is the most expensive model. It’s also the lightest at 1.0kg and has the most ports among the five laptops.
• Dell XPS Googlebook — Uses a Snapdragon X Elite processor and shares much of its design with the XPS 13. It has two USB-C ports.
• HP Googlebook — Also comes with a Snapdragon X Elite chip and offers up to 1TB of storage, the highest capacity in the lineup. It supports both face and fingerprint unlock.
• Lenovo Googlebook — Has the largest display at 15.3 inches, with a 2880×1800 OLED panel running at 120Hz. It’s also the only model available in white. Lenovo has added a “Glowbar” light strip to the lid for battery and charging information, along with a dedicated Google key on the keyboard that is expected to provide quick access to Gemini.

All five models come with a 12-month Google AI Pro subscription, 5TB of cloud storage, and three months of YouTube Premium, Photoshop, and CapCut. Google is also promising up to 10 years of system updates, matching the update period already offered with Chromebooks.

The pricing is quite different from the Chromebook lineup. Entry-level Chromebooks start at around $179, while Chromebook Plus models such as the ASUS Chromebook Plus CX34 are closer to $400. Even more expensive Chromebook Plus configurations generally stay below $800.

Googlebook sits in a different price range. With prices starting at $899, it’s positioned alongside premium laptops such as the MacBook Air rather than the budget and mid-range Chromebook market.

So is the Chromebook dead? No.

Google has been clear that Chromebooks and Chromebook Plus aren’t going anywhere. Both will continue to receive up to 10 years of updates, and schools and businesses can keep managing them through the same admin console they already use. Google executive Sameer Samat has also said Googlebook is intended for people who already use Android, rather than specifically targeting MacBook users.

That Android connection does come with some requirements. Cast My Apps and Quick Access, which let you stream phone apps and access files from your phone on the laptop, require an Android phone running Android 17 or later.

iPhone users can’t use those features for now. Google says iPhone support is coming, but it hasn’t announced when it will be available.

For someone who mainly browses the web, needs an affordable and durable laptop, or is buying computers for a classroom, the existing Chromebook lineup still makes sense within Google’s range. Googlebook is for users who want Android to play a bigger role on their laptop, along with deeper Gemini integration and closer connections with their phone.

The two platforms are therefore serving different parts of Google’s laptop lineup rather than one replacing the other. The main difference is that Googlebook starts at $899, while Chromebooks remain available at much lower prices.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

The post Googlebook vs Chromebook: What changes with Google’s Android laptop appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google’s Android-based laptop platform is finally shipping. Four months after confirming it was building an Android-based alternative to the Chromebook, and just days after leaked Lenovo renders gave us an early look, Google and five hardware partners have opened pre-orders for the first Googlebooks. They are available to order now, with sales beginning on October 4.

Acer, ASUS, Dell, HP, and Lenovo each have a model, with prices ranging from $899 to $1,299. The lineup includes everything from a 2-in-1 to a 15.3-inch laptop, giving buyers several hardware options.

Every Googlebook comes with a 12-month Google AI Pro subscription and 5TB of cloud storage. Buyers also get three months of YouTube Premium, Photoshop, and CapCut. Google says Googlebooks will receive system updates for up to 10 years.

Googlebook hardware

The Acer Googlebook 14 is the only 2-in-1 in the launch lineup and starts at $899. Acer has already warned that the launch price could increase if memory shortages continue to raise component costs. It has a 14-inch 2.8K OLED touchscreen, Intel Core Ultra 5 or Ultra 7 processors, and up to 16 hours of claimed battery life.

The ASUS Googlebook 14 costs $1,299. It has the most ports among the launch models and weighs just 1.0kg, making it the lightest option in the lineup.

Dell’s XPS Googlebook uses a Snapdragon X Elite processor and closely follows the design of the XPS 13, including its glow finish. Connectivity is limited to two USB-C ports.

HP also uses the Snapdragon X Elite and offers up to 1TB of storage, which is the largest storage option among the launch models. It also supports both face and fingerprint unlocking.

Lenovo’s Googlebook has the largest display at 15.3 inches and is the only model available in a white finish.

Googlebook OS and Gemini features

Googlebook OS combines elements of Android and ChromeOS, with Gemini built into several parts of the experience. 

One of the main features is Magic Pointer. When you move the cursor over something on the screen, Gemini can offer suggestions based on what you’re viewing. You can then follow up and open a chat window for more help.

Google is also using its smaller on-device Gemini Nano v3 model for file searches. Instead of sending files to the cloud, the model can summarize content locally on the laptop. Google has been using a similar on-device approach on phones such as the OnePlus 13.

Android integration is another major part of Googlebook OS. Users can run Android phone apps directly on the laptop, transfer files and photos between devices without going through the cloud, and continue tasks across devices.

Google executive Sameer Samat has said the platform is primarily aimed at Android users rather than people looking to move away from MacBooks. Google also plans to add iPhone connectivity in the future, although it has not provided a timeline yet.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

The post Googlebook PC launches with Android, Gemini features, and up to 10 years of updates appeared first on Gizmochina.

A small audio company in California just kicked off a US trade investigation that could make life harder for some of the biggest names in tech.

The US International Trade Commission is investigating certain electronic devices that use spatial audio technology. The complaint came from BoomCloud 360, an Encinitas-based firm that specializes in cloud-based sound optimization for movies, games, and music.

BoomCloud claims that products from Apple, Samsung (including its US subsidiary), and Google infringe three of its US patents covering spatial audio processing.

The patents involve techniques like adjusting the gain of spatial versus non-spatial audio, compensating for differences between left and right speakers, dynamically enhancing sound based on the rendering system, and handling crosstalk with spectral defect compensation.

BoomCloud is asking for a limited exclusion order that would block infringing devices from being imported into the US, plus cease-and-desist orders that would restrict sales and distribution inside the country. So far, no specific product models have been named publicly.

The original complaint was filed on August 14, with a supplement on August 31. The ITC voted to open the formal investigation in mid-September 2026. The companies reportedly have 20 days from receiving notice to respond. An administrative law judge will run the evidentiary hearing, and the Commission will eventually decide whether any intellectual property rights have been violated. Opening the probe doesn’t mean the ITC has taken a side on the claims yet.

Apple, Samsung, and Google have already filed separate lawsuits in federal court seeking declarations that their products don’t infringe BoomCloud’s patents. Those parallel cases show the companies are trying to fight the allegations outside the ITC process as well. BoomCloud has also gone after carriers and retailers earlier this year in related patent actions.

If the Commission ultimately finds infringement and grants the remedies BoomCloud wants, smartphones, headphones, and other devices that use the disputed spatial audio features could face import bans and sales restrictions in the US.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source)

The post Apple, Samsung, and Google face potential audio product ban in the US appeared first on Gizmochina.

iPhone 18 Pro and Google Pixel 11 Pro take very different approaches to the premium smartphone experience. Apple focuses on its A20 Pro chip, advanced video tools and a refined display, while Google pushes computational photography, a high-resolution selfie camera and long-term Android support. With both phones targeting the same flagship audience, the choice comes down to performance, cameras, battery, and overall value.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The iPhone 18 Pro combines a Ceramic Shield 2 front with an aluminum frame and Ceramic Shield rear construction, plus IP68 protection rated for immersion up to 6 meters. Its design feels particularly focused on durability and premium materials, while Face ID provides secure biometric authentication. The overall hardware package remains distinctly Apple.

The Pixel 11 Pro uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both sides with an aluminum frame and IP68 protection rated for immersion up to 1.5 meters. Its under-display ultrasonic fingerprint scanner adds flexibility that the iPhone lacks. The Pixel’s biometric approach is arguably more convenient for users who prefer fingerprint unlocking alongside face recognition.

Display Quality

Both phones use 6.3-inch LTPO OLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates, HDR support and adaptive refresh technology. The iPhone reaches 3,000 nits peak brightness and adds Dolby Vision, while Ceramic Shield 2 and an anti-reflective coating strengthen its outdoor usability and protection.

The Pixel 11 Pro counters with a sharper 1280 x 2856 resolution, 497ppi density and up to 3,600 nits peak brightness. Its 2,400-nit HBM rating is also higher than the iPhone’s 1,600 nits. For pure specifications, Google’s panel has the edge, although Apple’s display remains exceptionally polished.

Verdict

Apple feels better for premium build refinement and display protection, while Google offers higher brightness and sharper resolution. The Pixel wins on display specifications; the iPhone delivers the more balanced overall package.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The iPhone 18 Pro is powered by Apple’s A20 Pro, built on a 2nm process, paired with 12GB RAM and NVMe storage. Its six-core CPU and seven-core GPU are designed for demanding apps, gaming and Apple’s increasingly sophisticated on-device workloads. The combination should appeal strongly to performance-focused users seeking sustained flagship-class capability.

The Pixel 11 Pro runs Google’s Tensor G6 on a 3nm process, with 12GB RAM on the 256GB model and 16GB on higher storage configurations. Android 17 and Google’s promise of seven major OS updates add substantial long-term appeal. Tensor emphasizes Google’s AI ecosystem, making the Pixel particularly interesting for software-driven features.

Battery and Charging

The Pixel 11 Pro packs a larger 4,850mAh battery and supports 30W wired charging, reaching 55% in 30 minutes. It also offers 25W magnetic wireless charging, Qi2.2, reverse wired charging and bypass charging. That combination makes the Pixel more flexible for heavy users and gamers who value charging control.

The iPhone 18 Pro uses a market-dependent 4,056mAh or 4,288mAh battery and supports wired charging to 50% in 15 minutes. Its 25W MagSafe/Qi2 wireless charging is similarly competitive, while reverse wired charging adds another practical feature. Apple’s smaller battery capacity does not necessarily indicate weaker real-world endurance.

Verdict

Apple takes the performance-focused approach with the A20 Pro, while Google offers the larger battery and more flexible charging tools. For raw performance, Apple is the stronger choice; for battery capacity and charging versatility, Google stands out.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The iPhone 18 Pro features a 48MP main camera, 48MP 4x periscope telephoto and 48MP ultrawide, backed by sensor-shift stabilization and LiDAR. Its video capabilities are especially extensive, including 4K recording at up to 120fps, Dolby Vision, ProRes RAW and Apple Log 2. It remains exceptionally well-equipped for serious mobile video.

The Pixel 11 Pro combines a 50MP main sensor with a 48MP 5x periscope telephoto and 48MP ultrawide. Google adds Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR, Best Take and Zoom Enhance, while 8K video recording gives it a notable headline feature. Its computational photography approach makes the camera system particularly versatile for still photography.

Selfie Camera

Apple’s 18MP ultrawide selfie camera includes PDAF, Face ID’s SL 3D sensor and advanced video features such as Dolby Vision, ProRes RAW and Apple Log 2. The multi-aspect design also adds flexibility for framing selfies and video. For creators, Apple’s front-camera toolkit is unusually comprehensive.

The Pixel 11 Pro uses a substantially higher-resolution 42MP ultrawide selfie camera with PDAF and a 103-degree field of view. It supports 4K video at 60fps, giving Google a strong advantage for high-resolution front-facing video and group selfies. The Pixel is more specification-heavy, while Apple’s implementation is more creator-oriented.

Verdict

Apple is the stronger choice for professional-grade video and recording tools, while Google offers powerful computational photography and a higher-resolution selfie camera. For overall camera versatility, the iPhone’s video ecosystem gives it the advantage.

Pricing

The iPhone 18 Pro is priced around $1,200 / ₹164,900, placing it firmly in the ultra-premium segment. Its starting configuration includes 256GB storage and 12GB RAM, with options extending to 2TB. Apple’s higher Indian pricing reflects its premium positioning and substantial storage ceiling.

The Pixel 11 Pro is priced around $1,100 / ₹120,000, making it noticeably less expensive in both markets. Google also offers 12GB RAM with 256GB storage, while 16GB RAM becomes available with higher-capacity versions. That makes the Pixel particularly interesting for buyers comparing flagship specifications against upfront cost.

Is the price justified?

The iPhone’s premium can be justified by its A20 Pro platform, extensive professional video capabilities, Ceramic Shield 2, Face ID and mature ecosystem. However, buyers paying the premium are primarily choosing Apple’s platform and specialized features rather than simply getting more hardware for every dollar.

The Pixel 11 Pro delivers a larger battery, brighter display, higher-resolution cameras and seven major Android updates while costing substantially less. On specification-led value, Google’s approach is difficult to overlook. The Pixel therefore makes a more practical proposition for buyers who want flagship hardware without stretching toward Apple’s pricing.

Verdict

Google offers stronger value for money thanks to its lower pricing and competitive flagship specifications. Apple justifies its premium through performance, ecosystem integration and advanced video capabilities.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

iPhone 18 Pro distinguishes itself with the A20 Pro 2nm chipset, Face ID, LiDAR, Ceramic Shield 2, MagSafe/Qi2 charging and an unusually advanced video recording suite. ProRes RAW, Apple Log 2, Dolby Vision and 4K 120fps recording make it especially compelling for creators. Its 2TB storage option also suits demanding professional workflows.

Pixel 11 Pro counters with Tensor G6, seven major Android updates, a 5x periscope camera, 8K video, a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera and Google’s computational photography features. Its 4,850mAh battery, 3,600-nit display and bypass charging add further practical advantages. The lower price also significantly changes the value equation between these flagships.

Verdict

iPhone 18 Pro is the overall winner for its superior performance, professional video capabilities and polished ecosystem. Google Pixel 11 Pro remains the better value choice, especially for photography, battery capacity and long-term Android support.

FAQs

1. Which phone has better gaming performance?
The iPhone 18 Pro should deliver stronger gaming performance thanks to the A20 Pro chipset and Apple’s optimized gaming ecosystem.

2. Which phone takes better zoom photos?
The Pixel 11 Pro offers a 5x optical telephoto lens, while the iPhone 18 Pro provides 4x optical zoom.

3. Which phone charges faster?
The iPhone 18 Pro reaches 50% wired charge in 15 minutes, compared with 55% in 30 minutes for the Pixel 11 Pro.

4. Which phone is cheaper to buy?
The Pixel 11 Pro is significantly cheaper, making it the more affordable entry into this flagship class.

5. Which phone should you buy overall?
The iPhone 18 Pro suits performance and video-focused buyers, while the Pixel 11 Pro makes more sense for value-focused users.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• iPhone 18 Pro Max vs Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1300 Flagship Showdown
• iPhone 18 Pro vs Galaxy S26: Specs, Camera, Battery and Price
• Google Pixel 11 vs OnePlus 15: Specs, Camera, Battery & Price Compared

The post iPhone 18 Pro vs Pixel 11 Pro: Apple or Google’s Better Pro Flagship? appeared first on Gizmochina.

iPhone 18 Pro Max and Google Pixel 11 Pro XL represent two very different approaches to premium smartphones. Apple focuses on performance, video, ecosystem integration and pro-grade hardware, while Google pushes computational photography, AI features and a more flexible Android experience. With both priced around the $1,300 mark, the differences matter when choosing a long-term flagship.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The iPhone 18 Pro Max combines a Ceramic Shield 2 front with an aluminum frame and Ceramic Shield rear construction, plus IP68 protection rated for deeper water immersion. Pixel 11 Pro XL uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both sides with an aluminum frame and also carries IP68 protection. Apple’s construction feels more purpose-built for demanding everyday use, particularly with its upgraded front protection.

Both phones deliver a premium flagship feel, but their design philosophies differ. The iPhone emphasizes durability and a refined hardware ecosystem, while Pixel retains Google’s distinctive styling and familiar Android flagship identity. Ceramic Shield 2 and the stronger water-resistance specification give the iPhone a practical edge for users who prioritize physical protection and longevity.

Display Quality

The iPhone features a 6.9-inch LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED with 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10 and Dolby Vision. Pixel counters with a 6.8-inch LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate and HDR10+, while reaching higher claimed peak brightness. Google’s panel therefore looks particularly compelling for outdoor visibility and HDR content.

Verdict

Apple delivers stronger protection and Dolby Vision support, while Google offers higher claimed peak brightness. The iPhone feels more refined overall, but Pixel remains highly competitive for users prioritizing display brightness.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The iPhone 18 Pro Max runs Apple’s A20 Pro built on a 2nm process, paired with 12GB RAM and NVMe storage. Pixel 11 Pro XL uses Google’s Tensor G6 on 3nm, with up to 16GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. Apple’s silicon remains the more performance-focused approach, while Google emphasizes AI-driven workloads and software integration.

For demanding gaming, sustained performance and professional workloads, the A20 Pro specification suggests a stronger performance-oriented package. Pixel’s Tensor G6 instead makes more sense for users who value Google’s computational photography, AI processing and deeply integrated Android features. The higher RAM options are attractive, but RAM capacity alone does not determine real-world speed.

Battery and Charging

The iPhone offers market-dependent battery capacities, with wired charging reaching 50% in 15 minutes and 25W MagSafe/Qi2 wireless charging. Pixel packs a 5115mAh battery with 45W wired charging, reaching 75% in 30 minutes, alongside 25W magnetic wireless charging, reverse charging and bypass charging.

Verdict

The iPhone targets peak performance and fast charging, while Pixel provides more flexible charging features. For performance-heavy users, Apple has the stronger package; Pixel is more versatile for charging-focused use.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The iPhone uses a triple 48MP setup comprising wide, 4x periscope telephoto and ultrawide cameras. Pixel combines a 50MP main camera with 48MP 5x periscope and 48MP ultrawide lenses. Pixel offers longer native optical reach and a wider ultrawide field, while the iPhone adds LiDAR for depth sensing and advanced imaging workflows.

Video is a major iPhone strength, supporting 4K recording up to 120fps, Dolby Vision, ProRes, ProRes RAW and Apple Log 2. Pixel counters with 8K recording, Ultra-HDR, Pixel Shift, Best Take and Zoom Enhance. For creators prioritizing professional video controls, the iPhone’s toolset is notably more comprehensive and mature.

Selfie Camera

The iPhone uses an 18MP ultrawide selfie camera with PDAF and SL 3D depth sensing, while Pixel offers a 42MP ultrawide camera with PDAF. Both support 4K video, but Apple adds Dolby Vision, ProRes RAW and Apple Log 2 capabilities to its front-camera workflow.

Verdict

Pixel offers stronger native zoom and a higher-resolution selfie camera, but Apple’s video capabilities are significantly broader. The iPhone is the more creator-focused camera package, especially for professional video.

Pricing

The iPhone 18 Pro Max is priced around $1,300 or ₹180,000, while the Pixel 11 Pro XL is priced around $1,300 or ₹135,000. The similar US pricing creates a different value equation in India, where Google’s flagship carries a substantially lower listed price in the supplied figures.

The iPhone’s higher Indian pricing reflects the premium associated with Apple’s flagship positioning, ecosystem and professional-grade capabilities. Pixel’s lower Indian pricing makes its combination of 16GB RAM options, 5x optical zoom, bright display and charging flexibility considerably more accessible. For buyers comparing specifications against upfront cost, Google presents the less expensive proposition.

Is the price justified? 

At roughly the same US price, both phones justify their positioning through different strengths. The iPhone targets users who value performance, video production and Apple’s ecosystem, while Pixel prioritizes AI, photography and Android flexibility.

Verdict

Pixel offers stronger value at the supplied Indian pricing, while iPhone justifies its premium through performance and professional video capabilities. The better value depends heavily on ecosystem and usage priorities.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The iPhone 18 Pro Max stands out with the A20 Pro chip, LiDAR, ProRes RAW, Apple Log 2, Dolby Vision video and extensive professional recording options. Pixel 11 Pro XL counters with Tensor G6, up to 16GB RAM, 5x optical zoom, 8K video, Zoom Enhance, Best Take, bypass charging and a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera.

Apple therefore targets users who want maximum performance and a highly capable video-production tool, while Google offers a broader computational photography and AI-focused experience. Pixel also has an important pricing advantage in the supplied Indian figures, making the decision less straightforward than the specifications alone suggest.

Verdict

Overall winner: iPhone 18 Pro Max. Its A20 Pro performance, professional video capabilities, LiDAR and polished flagship ecosystem give it the more complete premium package, despite Pixel’s stronger value proposition.

FAQs

1. Which phone has the better camera zoom?
The Pixel 11 Pro XL offers 5x optical zoom, compared with 4x on the iPhone 18 Pro Max.

2. Which phone is better for gaming?
The iPhone 18 Pro Max is better suited to demanding gaming thanks to its A20 Pro chipset.

3. Which phone charges faster?
The Pixel 11 Pro XL reaches 75% in 30 minutes, while the iPhone reaches 50% in 15 minutes.

4. Which phone offers more RAM?
The Pixel 11 Pro XL offers up to 16GB RAM, while the iPhone 18 Pro Max comes with 12GB.

5. Which phone is cheaper in India?
The Pixel 11 Pro XL is priced around ₹135,000, making it considerably cheaper than the iPhone 18 Pro Max.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• iPhone 18 Pro vs Galaxy S26: Specs, Camera, Battery and Price
• iPhone 18 Pro Max vs Galaxy S26 Ultra: Samsung Has a Big Advantage
• Google Pixel 11 vs Xiaomi 17: Specs, Camera, Battery and Price Compared

The post iPhone 18 Pro Max vs Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1300 Flagship Showdown appeared first on Gizmochina.

If you look at the back of a modern flagship smartphone, you’ll notice that camera modules have grown significantly. We have moved past the simple megapixel race; today, manufacturers are focusing on larger sensors, better glass, and practical software that actually helps you take better photos.

The line between a dedicated point-and-shoot camera and a smartphone is thinner than ever, making it an excellent time to upgrade if photography is your priority.

Whether you prefer the tactile feel of physical lenses, the reliability of a simple point-and-shoot, or the flexibility of advanced editing software, the current market has something tailored to your workflow. Here is a look at the seven best camera phones available in September 2026.

Vivo X300 Ultra

Vivo has positioned the X300 Ultra as a pocket camera, and the hardware reflects that approach. The phone features three Zeiss-branded cameras on the back, built around a 200MP 35mm main camera using a Sony LYTIA 901 sensor. It also includes a 200MP 85mm gimbal-stabilized periscope telephoto lens for long-range shots and a 50MP 14mm ultra-wide camera.

What makes the X300 Ultra unique is its modular ecosystem. Vivo offers a Professional Imaging Kit that includes a camera grip and two physical Zeiss teleconverter modules: a 200mm lens that provides 8.7x optical zoom at a 200mm equivalent focal length, and a 400mm lens.

It also features Vivo’s Blueprint Original Color Camera technology and a dedicated 5MP spectral sensor for more accurate color reproduction, helping deliver a tactile, traditional photography experience.

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

The Oppo Find X9 Ultra leans heavily into its partnership with Hasselblad. The device features an eco-leather back and a comprehensive six-lens array. The primary setup includes a 200MP main sensor, a 200MP telephoto, and a dedicated 10x optical zoom Hasselblad lens that maintains optical quality up to 20x.

Oppo is using its new LUMO internal optical zoom technology, which helps retain detail by quadrupling the pixel count at the 2x and 6x zoom ranges. The software includes Hasselblad Master Mode, which allows for 8K photo output and includes Original Film profiles designed to replicate classic analog film stocks.

For those who want more physical control, Oppo’s Hasselblad Earth Explorer Kit adds a professional teleconverter, a camera grip, and a 67mm filter adapter ring.

Apple iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max

Apple’s latest upgrades to the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max focus heavily on camera hardware and computational image verification. Both phones feature a new 48MP Fusion Main camera with a mechanical variable aperture. The system uses a rotor mechanism with six laser-cut blades, allowing the aperture to adjust automatically or manually across four preset stops. It can open as wide as f/1.48, helping the camera capture more light in low-light conditions.

The main camera is joined by a 48MP ultra-wide camera with a 120-degree field of view and a 48MP telephoto camera. Together, the three cameras offer up to 8x optical-quality zoom and a 16x overall optical zoom range. On the front, the devices sport an upgraded 18MP TrueDepth camera with an f/1.9 aperture, Autofocus with Focus Pixels, and Center Stage support.

The new 2nm A20 Pro chip handles image and video processing. The phones can record 4K Dolby Vision video at up to 120fps and support algorithm-based audio separation to isolate dialogue from surrounding sounds. Apple has also expanded the native Camera app with manual controls for shutter speed, white balance, and aperture, along with an on-screen histogram.

Apple has also introduced a new system designed to help verify the authenticity of captured images. Pixel data can be cryptographically signed and securely processed using Private Cloud Compute, creating an immutable reference image that is stored alongside the original in the Photos app. The system also integrates SynthID metadata tracking, making it easier to identify subsequent edits or AI-based alterations.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra earns its spot by focusing heavily on low-light performance and practical video upgrades. Samsung has widened the apertures across its camera array, giving the 200MP main sensor an f/1.4 lens and the upgraded 50MP ultrawide an f/1.9 lens.

In practical terms, this allows the hardware to capture much more light naturally, resulting in cleaner photos and improved Nightography video in dim environments without over-relying on software processing. The zoom setup remains highly versatile, featuring a 10MP 3x telephoto and a 50MP 5x periscope lens.

For video shooters, the S26 Ultra is the first Galaxy device to support the Advanced Professional Video (APV) standard, which efficiently compresses high-quality video files so they don’t eat up your storage as quickly.

Combined with upgraded Super Steady stabilization, updated native AI editing tools, and a front-facing camera equipped with a new AI Image Signal Processor for more accurate skin tones in mixed lighting, it is a thoroughly well-rounded tool for mobile photography and filmmaking.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Xiaomi’s ongoing collaboration with Leica continues with the 17 Ultra. The phone retains its distinct circular camera module, housing a quad-camera array. The main camera uses a 1-inch type sensor with a variable aperture, supported by three 50MP lenses for ultra-wide, 3x telephoto, and 5x periscope duties.

The image processing is handled by Xiaomi’s custom Surge chip, which is tuned to deliver Leica’s signature color science and contrast-heavy look with minimal shutter lag. Xiaomi also offers a Photography Kit for this model, which adds a case with a two-stage shutter button, a zoom lever, and a 67mm filter thread, making it feel much more like a traditional point-and-shoot.

Google Pixel 11 Pro and Pro XL

The Pixel 11 Pro series introduces a refined edge-to-edge camera bar that houses significantly upgraded imaging sensors. The primary camera utilizes a new 50MP sensor with OIS, flanked by a 48MP 123-degree ultra-wide lens that includes macro capabilities.

For zoomed shots, Google has redesigned the 48MP 5x telephoto lens, equipping it with a larger sensor that improves light sensitivity by 30% compared to previous generations. The front-facing camera has also seen a major update, now featuring a 42MP sensor with autofocus and a wide 103-degree field of view for better group selfies.

Driving these hardware changes is the new Tensor G6 processor, which features a 50% increase in TPU compute power specifically designed to run Gemini Nano AI models locally and efficiently. This translates to tangible computational photography improvements: Night Sight capture speeds are now up to 4.5 times faster, the digital Pro Res Zoom extends up to 120x, and the device can record 8K video at 24 or 30 fps using Google’s Video Boost processing.

Additionally, the models introduce HiLight, a subtle contextual LED alert system embedded around the rear camera flash. When the phone is placed face down, these customizable glowing patterns can visually signal when Gemini is listening or processing, as well as identify incoming calls from specific contacts using personalized color codes.

Vivo X300 Pro

The Vivo X300 Pro is a strong alternative if you don’t want to step all the way up to the Ultra model. It is the first phone to use the 50MP Sony LYT828 main sensor, and it pairs that with a 50MP ultra-wide and the same 200MP periscope telephoto lens found on the X300 Ultra.

It relies on Vivo’s custom V3+ and VS1 dual imaging chips, which are particularly effective for shooting 4K HDR cinematic portrait videos. The X300 Pro is also compatible with the Zeiss 2.35x telephoto extender kit, allowing users to experiment with physical lens attachments on a slightly more accessible device.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

The post The 7 Best Camera Phones You Can Buy in September 2026 appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google Pixel 11 and Xiaomi 17 take very different approaches to the flagship smartphone formula. Pixel focuses on Google’s software, AI features and long-term support, while Xiaomi pushes hardware with a faster chip, larger battery and more versatile cameras. For buyers spending around $1000/ ₹90,000, the choice comes down to whether software refinement or hardware muscle matters more.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

Both phones combine glass panels with aluminum frames and carry IP68 protection, giving them the durability expected from premium flagships. The Pixel 11 uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2, while the Xiaomi 17 gets Xiaomi Shield Glass globally and Dragon Crystal Glass in China. Both also offer ultrasonic in-display fingerprint scanners. Xiaomi has the more distinctive hardware package, particularly with dual-SIM flexibility and an IR port, while Pixel keeps its feature set cleaner and more Google-focused.

Display Quality

The two phones use 6.3-inch 120Hz OLED-class displays, but Xiaomi offers considerably more display hardware. Its LTPO AMOLED panel supports Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid and HDR10+, reaches 3500 nits peak brightness and has a sharper 1220 x 2656 resolution. Pixel 11 offers HDR10+ and up to 3000 nits peak brightness with a 1080 x 2424 resolution. Xiaomi’s screen is the stronger choice for multimedia and outdoor visibility.

Verdict

Xiaomi 17 wins this section with its sharper LTPO display, higher peak brightness and broader HDR support. Pixel 11 remains excellent, but Xiaomi delivers more impressive display hardware.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Xiaomi 17 has a major performance advantage with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, paired with up to 16GB RAM and UFS 4.1 storage. Pixel 11 uses Google’s Tensor G6 with 12GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. The Tensor platform is designed around Google’s AI and software experiences, but Xiaomi’s newer Snapdragon silicon should be better suited to demanding gaming and sustained performance. For raw power, Xiaomi is the more compelling option.

Battery and Charging

Xiaomi also dominates the battery department. The global model packs a 6330mAh silicon-carbon battery with 100W wired and 50W wireless charging. Pixel 11 has a 4985mAh battery with 30W wired and 25W magnetic wireless charging. Google counters with bypass charging and Qi2.2 support, but Xiaomi’s combination of capacity and charging speed is far more practical for heavy users who want less time connected to a charger.

Verdict

Xiaomi 17 is the clear hardware winner. Its Snapdragon chip, larger battery, faster charging and broader memory configurations make it substantially better equipped for demanding everyday use.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Pixel 11 uses a 48MP main camera, 10.8MP 5x telephoto and 13MP ultrawide, combining optical reach with Google’s computational photography. Xiaomi 17 takes a more hardware-heavy approach with three 50MP sensors, including a larger 1/1.31-inch main sensor and a 2.6x telephoto. Leica optics, laser autofocus and advanced video formats add further versatility. Pixel may have the more established image-processing philosophy, but Xiaomi offers the more capable camera hardware overall.

Selfie Camera

The difference is particularly striking on the front. Pixel 11 has a 10.5MP ultrawide selfie camera with PDAF and supports 4K video at up to 60fps. Xiaomi 17 uses a 50MP wide selfie camera with PDAF, HDR10+ recording and 4K video at 60fps. For detailed selfies, video calls and front-facing content, Xiaomi’s sensor provides more hardware headroom. Pixel’s wider perspective remains useful for group selfies.

Verdict

Xiaomi 17 takes the camera win on hardware and versatility, with three 50MP rear sensors and a 50MP selfie camera. Pixel 11 remains attractive for computational photography fans.

Pricing

The Google Pixel 11 is priced around $900 / ₹90,000, while the Xiaomi 17 is priced around $1,000 / ₹90,000 based on the supplied approximate pricing. That makes the comparison unusual because the stated Indian prices are effectively identical despite Xiaomi offering substantially stronger hardware in several areas. Pixel’s 256GB and 512GB configurations both include 12GB RAM, while Xiaomi offers up to 1TB storage and 16GB RAM.

Is the price justified? 

At around ₹90,000, Pixel 11 can justify its price through Google’s software experience, AI-focused features and promise of up to seven major Android updates. Xiaomi provides stronger specifications for the money, including a larger battery, 100W charging, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and a more advanced camera setup. Unless Pixel-specific software features are the priority, Xiaomi delivers greater hardware value.

Verdict

Xiaomi 17 offers better value at the stated price, delivering considerably more hardware for similar money. Pixel 11 makes more sense for buyers prioritizing Google’s software ecosystem and long-term updates.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The Pixel 11’s biggest strengths are Google’s Tensor G6 platform, long software support, Pixel-focused computational photography and Qi2.2 magnetic wireless charging. Xiaomi 17 counters with Leica-branded optics, a 6330mAh silicon-carbon battery, 100W charging, an IR port, Wi-Fi 7 and up to 1TB storage. Xiaomi also offers a broader 50MP camera system and substantially stronger charging capabilities. Pixel’s seven major OS updates remain a meaningful advantage for long-term ownership, especially for users who value clean Android and Google’s AI ecosystem. 

However, Xiaomi feels like the more complete hardware package, particularly for power users, photographers and gamers. At roughly the same stated Indian price, its advantages are difficult to overlook. Pixel remains the safer pick for software-first buyers, but Xiaomi offers considerably more specification headroom without compromising the flagship essentials.

Verdict

Xiaomi 17 is the overall winner, thanks to its stronger performance, superior display, larger battery, faster charging and more versatile camera hardware. Pixel 11 wins on software longevity, but Xiaomi delivers better overall value.

FAQs

1. Which phone has better camera quality, Pixel 11 or Xiaomi 17?
Xiaomi 17 offers more versatile camera hardware, while Pixel 11 is likely to excel at computational photography.

2. Is Xiaomi 17 faster than Google Pixel 11?
Yes. Xiaomi 17’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 offers stronger raw performance, especially for gaming and demanding apps.

3. Which phone has better battery life?
Xiaomi 17 has the larger battery and significantly faster charging, making it better suited to heavy daily use.

4. Which phone is better for gaming?
Xiaomi 17 is the better gaming choice thanks to its flagship Snapdragon chipset and larger battery.

5. Should you buy Pixel 11 or Xiaomi 17?
Choose Xiaomi 17 for hardware and value; choose Pixel 11 if Google’s software experience and updates matter more.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• Google Pixel 11 vs OnePlus 15: Specs, Camera, Battery & Price Compared
• Google Pixel 11 vs iPhone 17: Which Flagship Phone Should You Buy?
• Google Pixel 11 Pro vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Which Phone Gives You More Value?

The post Google Pixel 11 vs Xiaomi 17: Specs, Camera, Battery and Price Compared appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google Pixel 11 and OnePlus 15 take very different approaches to the flagship-phone formula. Pixel focuses on compact design, Google’s software experience and computational photography, while OnePlus pushes performance, display technology, cameras, and charging much harder. With both priced around the same level, the real question is which phone delivers more for the money.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Pixel 11 keeps things relatively understated with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both sides, an aluminum frame and IP68 protection. Its smaller footprint also makes it a more approachable option for users who prefer a phone that is easier to handle. The ultrasonic fingerprint sensor adds a premium touch to everyday usability.

The OnePlus 15 feels more ambitious, combining Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection with an aluminum frame and IP68/IP69K resistance. It also offers different rear materials depending on the variant. The higher protection rating is useful, while the overall design feels more performance-oriented. For practicality, however, Pixel’s simpler approach has broader appeal.

Display Quality

The Pixel 11 features a 6.3-inch OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+ support and up to 3000 nits peak brightness. Its 1080p resolution is sensible for efficiency, while the display should remain smooth and highly visible outdoors. It is a strong balance rather than a specification-heavy showcase.

The OnePlus 15 goes considerably further with a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display, 165Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision, HDR10+ and HDR Vivid support. Its higher resolution and adaptive technology make it better suited to gaming and media consumption. OnePlus clearly wins the display specification battle, while Pixel remains the easier choice for users wanting a smaller screen.

Verdict

OnePlus 15 wins this section with its larger LTPO AMOLED panel, 165Hz refresh rate and broader HDR support. Pixel 11 remains appealing for users who prioritize a compact, straightforward flagship experience.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 uses Google’s Tensor G6 on a 3nm process, paired with 12GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. It should be particularly well suited to Google’s AI features and tightly integrated software experience. The OnePlus 15, however, uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 with up to 16GB RAM and UFS 4.1 storage.

For demanding gaming, sustained performance and heavier multitasking, the OnePlus 15 has the more convincing hardware package. Its Snapdragon platform is designed for flagship-class workloads, while additional RAM and faster storage options give enthusiasts more headroom. Pixel’s advantage is tighter software integration rather than outright hardware muscle, making OnePlus the more practical performance choice.

Battery and Charging

Battery capacity is one of the biggest differences between these phones. The Pixel 11 packs a 4985mAh battery with 30W wired and 25W wireless charging, plus Qi2.2 magnetic support and bypass charging. That setup is respectable but conservative for a modern flagship at this price.

The OnePlus 15 brings a huge 7300mAh silicon-carbon battery and dramatically faster 120W wired charging. It also supports 50W wireless charging, reverse wireless charging and bypass charging. This combination gives OnePlus a major advantage for heavy users, gamers and frequent travelers. The Pixel’s wireless ecosystem is attractive, but OnePlus is far more practical for endurance and charging speed.

Verdict

OnePlus 15 wins decisively thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, larger battery and 120W charging. Pixel 11 remains compelling for software-focused users, but OnePlus offers substantially stronger hardware value.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Pixel 11 uses a 48MP main camera with OIS, a 10.8MP 5x optical telephoto and a 13MP ultrawide with PDAF. Google also brings features such as Best Take, Ultra HDR, Pixel Shift and advanced autofocus. The hardware is relatively restrained, but Pixel’s computational photography remains an important part of its appeal.

The OnePlus 15 uses three 50MP cameras, including a 3.5x periscope telephoto and a 116-degree ultrawide. It also supports 8K recording, 4K at 120fps, Dolby Vision and LUT functionality. OnePlus offers more versatile camera hardware and stronger video specifications, while Pixel’s 5x telephoto could prove more useful for distant subjects. Overall, OnePlus feels more complete on paper.

Selfie Camera

Pixel 11 has a 10.5MP ultrawide selfie camera with PDAF and 4K video recording at up to 60fps. Its autofocus and wide field of view make it useful for group selfies and video calls. Google also includes HDR and panorama features for a straightforward shooting experience.

The OnePlus 15 steps up to a 32MP autofocus selfie camera with a wider 21mm field of view. It can record 4K video at 60fps and supports HDR video, giving creators considerably more flexibility. While megapixels alone do not guarantee better selfies, OnePlus offers the stronger hardware package. Pixel may still benefit from Google’s image processing, but OnePlus is the more versatile front-camera option.

Verdict

OnePlus 15 wins for camera versatility, higher-resolution sensors and significantly stronger video capabilities. Pixel 11 remains attractive for computational photography, but OnePlus offers the more complete camera system.

Pricing

The Pixel 11 is priced around $900 / ₹90,000, while the OnePlus 15 is also priced around $900 / ₹90,000. That puts both phones directly into flagship territory, making the comparison especially interesting because neither has an obvious price advantage.

At the same asking price, OnePlus provides substantially more hardware. Its 165Hz LTPO display, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, up to 16GB RAM, 7300mAh battery and 120W charging create a notably stronger specification sheet. Pixel counters with its software ecosystem, seven major Android OS updates and Google-specific features, which can matter more to long-term buyers.

Is the price justified? 

The Pixel 11 can justify its price for buyers who specifically value Google’s software experience, long-term updates, computational photography and compact form factor. Its feature set feels carefully balanced rather than designed to win specification charts.

The OnePlus 15 offers more obvious hardware value at the same price. The larger battery, faster charging, flagship Snapdragon chip, higher-refresh display and triple 50MP camera system make the package easier to recommend to performance-focused buyers. Unless Pixel’s software advantages are the priority, OnePlus gives more hardware for the money.

Verdict

At around the same price, OnePlus 15 offers better value for money. Pixel 11 earns its premium through software and Google-specific features, but OnePlus delivers considerably more flagship hardware.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The Pixel 11 stands out with Google’s Tensor G6 platform, seven major Android updates, Pixel-focused photography features, Qi2.2 magnetic wireless charging and a compact OLED design. Its appeal comes from integration rather than chasing maximum specifications, making it particularly attractive to users invested in Google’s software ecosystem.

The OnePlus 15 takes the opposite route with a 165Hz LTPO AMOLED display, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 7300mAh silicon-carbon battery, 120W wired charging, 50W wireless charging, IP68/IP69K protection and three 50MP rear cameras. These features make it a stronger all-round hardware package and especially compelling for demanding users.

Verdict

OnePlus 15 is the overall winner. It delivers superior performance, display technology, battery life, charging and camera versatility at roughly the same price, making it the stronger value-focused flagship.

FAQs

1. Which phone has better camera zoom, Pixel 11 or OnePlus 15?
Pixel 11 offers 5x optical zoom, while OnePlus 15 has 3.5x optical zoom.

2. Which phone is better for gaming, Pixel 11 or OnePlus 15?
OnePlus 15 is better for gaming, thanks to its Snapdragon flagship processor and 165Hz display.

3. Which phone lasts longer on a single charge?
OnePlus 15 should last longer, with its significantly larger 7300mAh battery.

4. Is Pixel 11 worth buying over OnePlus 15?
Yes, if Google’s software experience, camera processing and long-term updates matter more than maximum hardware specifications.

5. Which phone should you buy overall?
OnePlus 15 is the stronger overall choice for buyers prioritizing performance, battery, charging and hardware value.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• Google Pixel 11 vs iPhone 17: Which Flagship Phone Should You Buy?
• Google Pixel 11 Pro vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Which Phone Gives You More Value?
• Pixel 11 Pro XL vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Battery, Camera and Performance Compared

The post Google Pixel 11 vs OnePlus 15: Specs, Camera, Battery & Price Compared appeared first on Gizmochina.

On paper, the Pixel 11 and iPhone 17 look like evenly matched rivals. In practice, they make very different trade-offs. The Pixel 11 bets on camera versatility, battery life and Google’s AI-driven experience, while the iPhone 17 leans into raw performance, video and polish. For buyers spending flagship money, choosing between them comes down to which strengths matter most.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Pixel 11 combines Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both sides with an aluminum frame and IP68 protection. Its design feels familiar but durable, while the ultrasonic fingerprint sensor adds convenient biometric unlocking. The iPhone 17 uses Ceramic Shield 2, an aluminum frame and glass back, with stronger stated water resistance and Face ID.

Both phones look premium, but the iPhone 17 feels slightly more refined thanks to its Ceramic Shield 2 protection and tighter ecosystem integration. The Pixel 11 is more practical for users who prefer fingerprint unlocking and Android’s flexible interface. Neither has a headphone jack, while both feature stereo speakers and modern wireless connectivity. Overall, the Pixel feels more functional, while the iPhone feels more polished.

Display Quality

Both smartphones feature 6.3-inch 120Hz OLED panels with HDR support and 3000-nit peak brightness. The Pixel 11 offers HDR10+ and a 1080p-class resolution, while the iPhone 17 uses a sharper 1206 x 2622 panel with Dolby Vision and an anti-reflective coating. The iPhone also has a higher stated pixel density.

The Pixel’s display should still look excellent for everyday use, streaming and gaming, but the iPhone 17 has the stronger specifications overall. Its sharper panel, Dolby Vision support and anti-reflective treatment make it the more impressive option for multimedia consumption and outdoor viewing.

Verdict

The iPhone 17 wins the display comparison with its sharper panel, Dolby Vision and anti-reflective coating. The Pixel 11 counters with excellent brightness and HDR10+, but Apple’s screen feels more complete.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 runs Android 17 with Google’s Tensor G6, paired with 12GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. Its hardware is clearly designed around AI features and Google’s software optimization. The iPhone 17 uses Apple’s A19 chip with 8GB RAM and NVMe storage, targeting high performance and efficient iOS integration.

Raw specifications do not tell the entire story here. The A19 should have the edge for demanding workloads, gaming and sustained performance, while the Pixel’s additional RAM suits multitasking and AI-driven features. For users prioritizing conventional flagship performance, the iPhone 17 looks stronger. For Google’s AI-centric software experience, the Pixel 11 is arguably more interesting.

Battery and Charging

The Pixel 11 packs a substantially larger 4985mAh battery and supports 30W wired charging, 25W magnetic wireless charging and reverse wired charging. It also includes bypass charging, which can be useful during extended gaming sessions. The iPhone 17 has a smaller 3692mAh battery but supports wired fast charging and 25W MagSafe or Qi2 wireless charging.

Capacity alone does not determine endurance, and Apple’s chip and software efficiency can compensate for its smaller battery. Still, the Pixel 11 offers more charging flexibility and a much larger battery reserve. It is the more practical choice for heavy users who value battery capacity and features.

Verdict

The iPhone 17 wins performance, but the Pixel 11 wins battery hardware and charging flexibility. Overall, the Pixel suits heavy users better, while the iPhone remains stronger for demanding performance.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Pixel 11 takes the more versatile approach with a 48MP main camera, 10.8MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, and 13MP ultrawide. Features such as Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR and Best Take add useful computational photography tools. The iPhone 17 pairs a 48MP main camera with a 48MP ultrawide, but lacks a dedicated telephoto lens.

That gives the Pixel 11 a clear advantage for zoom photography and shooting distant subjects. The iPhone 17, however, offers a stronger video package, including Dolby Vision HDR recording and a wider range of supported frame rates. For everyday photography, both should deliver excellent results, but the Pixel 11’s three-camera setup feels more complete.

Selfie Camera

The Pixel 11 uses a 10.5MP ultrawide selfie camera with PDAF and 4K video recording at up to 60fps. The iPhone 17 steps up to an 18MP multi-aspect front camera with PDAF, Dolby Vision HDR, 3D spatial audio and stereo sound recording.

The iPhone 17 is the stronger choice for selfies, video calls and social-media content, particularly for users who frequently record themselves. Its higher-resolution front camera and advanced video features give it greater flexibility. The Pixel 11 remains capable, but Apple’s front-camera system offers a more feature-rich experience for creators and everyday video use.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 wins for rear-camera versatility with its dedicated 5x telephoto, while the iPhone 17 leads for selfies and video. Overall, Pixel is the better pick for photography flexibility.

Pricing

The Pixel 11 is priced around $900 or ₹90,000, while the iPhone 17 is priced around $800 or ₹83,000. That gives the iPhone a meaningful price advantage despite offering a premium build, 120Hz OLED display, A19 processor and strong camera hardware.

The Pixel 11 justifies some of its premium through 12GB RAM, a larger battery, a dedicated 5x telephoto camera and 25W magnetic wireless charging. However, those additions may not matter equally to every buyer. The iPhone 17 delivers a broader flagship experience for less money, making it the easier recommendation for value-conscious buyers.

Is the price justified? 

The Pixel 11 makes sense for buyers who specifically want Google’s software, AI capabilities, fingerprint unlocking, longer battery capacity and optical zoom. Those features create a distinctive package rather than simply adding higher specifications on paper. It is worthwhile for users who will actually use those advantages.

The iPhone 17 offers stronger conventional performance, a more advanced selfie system and excellent display technology at a lower price. That combination makes it the better value proposition overall. The Pixel’s premium is easier to justify for photography-focused Android users than for shoppers seeking the strongest all-round deal.

Verdict

The iPhone 17 offers better value at its lower price, combining stronger performance and multimedia features. The Pixel 11 earns its premium through zoom, battery capacity and Google’s software advantages.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The Pixel 11 stands out with its Tensor G6 platform, 12GB RAM, 5x optical telephoto camera, ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, large battery, bypass charging and Google-centric AI experience. It is the more distinctive choice for Android users who value photography flexibility and practical power-user features.

The iPhone 17 counters with the A19 chip, Face ID, Ceramic Shield 2, Dolby Vision, an 18MP multi-aspect selfie camera and MagSafe or Qi2 charging. Its combination of performance, display quality and video capabilities makes it the more rounded mainstream flagship. For buyers who prioritize speed and polished content creation, the iPhone has the stronger overall package.

Verdict

The iPhone 17 is the overall winner, thanks to stronger performance, a sharper display, better selfie and video capabilities, and a lower price. The Pixel 11 is the better alternative for zoom photography, battery capacity, and Android flexibility.

FAQs

1. Is Pixel 11 better for photography than iPhone 17?
Yes. Its dedicated 5x telephoto makes the Pixel 11 more versatile for zoom and distant subjects.

2. Which phone is faster, Pixel 11 or iPhone 17?
The iPhone 17 is faster overall, particularly for demanding apps, gaming and sustained performance.

3. Does Pixel 11 have better battery life than iPhone 17?
The Pixel 11 has a much larger battery, making it the stronger choice for heavy users.

4. Which phone offers better value for money?
The iPhone 17 offers better value, combining flagship performance and features with a lower starting price.

5. Should you buy Pixel 11 or iPhone 17?
Choose Pixel 11 for camera versatility and battery capacity; choose iPhone 17 for performance, video and overall value.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• Google Pixel 11 Pro vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Which Phone Gives You More Value?
• Pixel 11 Pro XL vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Battery, Camera and Performance Compared
• iPhone Duo vs Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate: Apple vs the Wildest Foldable Yet

The post Google Pixel 11 vs iPhone 17: Which Flagship Phone Should You Buy? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google Pixel 11 Pro and OPPO Find X9 Pro take very different approaches to the premium Android phone. The Pixel focuses on computational photography, clean software, long-term updates, and Google’s custom Tensor platform, while OPPO pushes hardware with a huge battery, faster charging, and an unusually capable 200MP telephoto camera.

This comparison matters because both phones sit around the same flagship price range, yet prioritize different strengths. The Pixel 11 Pro looks more appealing for software longevity and photography, while the Find X9 Pro is built for buyers who want maximum hardware value. The better choice ultimately depends on whether refinement or raw hardware flexibility matters more.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

Both phones use premium glass construction with aluminum frames and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection on the front. They also offer IP68 water and dust resistance, while the Find X9 Pro adds IP69 protection for greater resistance to high-pressure water jets. Both feature ultrasonic in-display fingerprint sensors and stereo speakers. The OPPO feels more feature-packed from a durability perspective, although the Pixel’s design remains more understated and cohesive.

The Pixel 11 Pro also offers UWB, which expands its potential for device tracking and ecosystem features. OPPO counters with an infrared port, making the Find X9 Pro more useful as a universal remote. Neither phone has a headphone jack. For everyday flagship use, both are well equipped, but OPPO delivers a slightly broader hardware feature set.

Display Quality

The Pixel 11 Pro has a 6.3-inch LTPO OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and up to 3,600 nits peak brightness. Its higher pixel density should produce exceptionally crisp text and images, while adaptive refresh rates help balance smoothness and efficiency. It is particularly well suited to users who prefer a compact flagship screen.

The Find X9 Pro counters with a larger 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display supporting Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 1 billion colors, and 3,600 nits peak brightness. Its 2,160Hz PWM dimming can also be easier on sensitive eyes. For movies and gaming, OPPO’s larger canvas feels more immersive, while Pixel wins for compact usability.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro wins the display section for its larger panel, Dolby Vision, richer format support, and high-frequency PWM dimming. Pixel remains preferable for buyers who value a smaller flagship screen.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 Pro uses Google’s Tensor G6, built on a 3nm process, paired with up to 16GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. Its seven-core design is optimized around Google’s software and AI workloads rather than headline specifications alone. The phone should therefore feel particularly well integrated for everyday tasks, photography processing, and Pixel-exclusive AI features.

The Find X9 Pro uses the 3nm Dimensity 9500 with an octa-core CPU, Arm G1-Ultra graphics, up to 16GB RAM, and faster UFS 4.1 storage. On paper, its configuration is more performance-oriented and better suited to demanding gaming and sustained workloads. OPPO has the stronger hardware proposition here, especially for users who prioritize raw performance.

Battery and Charging

Battery capacity is one of the biggest differences. The Pixel 11 Pro packs a 4,850mAh battery with 30W wired charging and 25W magnetic wireless charging. It also supports reverse wired charging and bypass charging. Google’s software optimization should help, but the charging hardware is conservative for a modern flagship.

OPPO dramatically raises the bar with a 7,500mAh silicon-carbon battery, 80W wired charging, and 50W wireless charging. It also supports 10W reverse wireless charging. The difference is substantial in practical terms, giving the Find X9 Pro much greater endurance potential and faster top-ups. OPPO clearly feels more practical for heavy users.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro wins comfortably, combining a much larger battery with 80W wired and 50W wireless charging. Pixel’s charging features are useful, but OPPO offers substantially better hardware value.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Pixel 11 Pro combines a 50MP main camera, 48MP 5x periscope telephoto, and 48MP ultrawide. Google adds features such as Best Take, Zoom Enhance, Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR, and multi-zone laser autofocus. The long 5x optical zoom is particularly useful for distant subjects and complements Pixel’s computational photography approach.

The Find X9 Pro uses a 50MP f/1.5 main camera, 200MP 3x periscope telephoto, and 50MP ultrawide. Its large telephoto sensor and high resolution give it considerable cropping flexibility, while Hasselblad color calibration and LOG video target enthusiasts. OPPO has the more ambitious camera hardware, but Pixel’s processing could produce more consistently polished results.

Selfie Camera

Google equips the Pixel 11 Pro with a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera featuring PDAF and 4K video recording at up to 60fps. The wider field of view makes it particularly useful for group selfies and video calls, while autofocus should improve consistency compared with fixed-focus alternatives.

OPPO uses a 50MP wide selfie camera with PDAF, a 21mm equivalent field of view, and 4K recording at up to 60fps. It offers strong hardware on paper, while gyro-EIS adds stabilization for video. OPPO’s higher-resolution sensor is appealing, but Pixel’s ultrawide framing gives it greater flexibility. Both are strong selfie systems.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 Pro wins for computational photography and its versatile 5x zoom, while OPPO offers stronger camera hardware. For predictable point-and-shoot results, Pixel has the edge.

Pricing

The Pixel 11 Pro is priced around $1,100 or ₹120,000, while the OPPO Find X9 Pro is priced around $1,000 or ₹100,000. That gives OPPO a meaningful price advantage despite offering a larger battery, faster charging, and a 200MP periscope telephoto camera.

The gap becomes more significant when the hardware is considered as a package. Pixel’s premium is easier to understand if long-term software support, Google’s ecosystem, and computational photography are priorities. However, buyers primarily comparing specifications get considerably more hardware from OPPO for less money. On pure hardware value, the Find X9 Pro looks difficult to beat.

Is the price justified? 

The Pixel 11 Pro can justify its higher price through seven major Android updates, Google’s software experience, AI features, and camera processing. Those advantages matter to buyers intending to keep a phone for many years rather than upgrading frequently.

The Find X9 Pro offers five major Android updates, which is still substantial, but falls behind Google’s commitment. However, its stronger charging system, enormous battery, premium camera hardware, and broader feature set make its lower price especially compelling. OPPO delivers more physical hardware for the money, while Pixel makes a stronger case through software longevity.

Verdict

The OPPO Find X9 Pro offers better value for money, thanks to its lower price and substantially stronger battery and charging hardware. Pixel earns its premium through software longevity and camera processing.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The Pixel 11 Pro stands out with seven major Android updates, Tensor G6 processing, UWB, satellite SOS, magnetic Qi2.2 wireless charging, and Google’s computational photography features. Its 5x periscope also gives it a different imaging strategy from OPPO’s high-resolution 3x telephoto. It is the more software-focused flagship, designed around Google’s ecosystem and long-term ownership.

The Find X9 Pro answers with a 7,500mAh silicon-carbon battery, 80W wired charging, 50W wireless charging, IP69 protection, an IR blaster, and a 200MP periscope camera. Its hardware package is unusually aggressive for the price. For demanding users, frequent travelers, gamers, and anyone prioritizing endurance, OPPO offers more immediately useful hardware.

Verdict

Overall winner: OPPO Find X9 Pro. Its bigger battery, faster charging, versatile camera hardware, stronger durability, and lower price make it the more compelling all-round flagship. Pixel 11 Pro remains the better choice for long-term software support and computational photography.

FAQs

1. Which phone has the better camera, Pixel 11 Pro or Find X9 Pro?
The Pixel 11 Pro offers stronger computational photography, while OPPO provides more ambitious camera hardware and a 200MP telephoto.

2. Is the Pixel 11 Pro faster than the Find X9 Pro?
The Find X9 Pro has the stronger performance-focused chipset configuration, making it the better choice for demanding workloads and gaming.

3. Which phone has better battery life?
The Find X9 Pro should deliver longer battery life thanks to its significantly larger 7,500mAh battery.

4. Which phone offers better value for money?
The Find X9 Pro offers better value with a lower price and a stronger overall hardware package.

5. Should you buy the Pixel 11 Pro or Find X9 Pro?
Choose the Pixel for software longevity and Google’s camera processing; choose OPPO for battery, charging, performance, and hardware value.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• Pixel 11 Pro XL vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Battery, Camera and Performance Compared
• iPhone Duo vs Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate: Apple vs the Wildest Foldable Yet
• iPhone Duo vs iPhone 18 Pro Max: $2,000 Foldable or Smarter Buy?

The post Google Pixel 11 Pro vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Which Phone Gives You More Value? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL and OPPO Find X9 Pro take different approaches to the premium Android phone. Pixel emphasizes computational photography, clean software, and long-term updates, while OPPO pushes hardware with a huge battery, faster charging, and a 200MP telephoto camera. The comparison matters for buyers deciding whether Google’s software experience or OPPO’s hardware advantage is more compelling.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Pixel 11 Pro XL combines Gorilla Glass Victus 2 with an aluminum frame and an IP68 rating, giving it a familiar premium flagship design. OPPO uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the front, a glass rear, aluminum frame, and stronger IP68/IP69 protection. Both offer ultrasonic fingerprint readers and stereo speakers, but OPPO feels more practically equipped for demanding everyday use.

Display Quality

The Pixel has a slightly larger 6.8-inch LTPO OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and up to 3600 nits peak brightness. OPPO counters with a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display supporting Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, and 2160Hz PWM. Pixel’s higher resolution is appealing, while OPPO’s broader HDR support makes its screen more versatile.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro edges the display and durability category with IP69 protection, Dolby Vision, and an excellent AMOLED experience. Pixel remains compelling for sharper resolution and Google’s polished display tuning.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 Pro XL uses Google’s Tensor G6, paired with up to 16GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. OPPO uses the Dimensity 9500, also reaching 16GB RAM, with faster UFS 4.1 storage. OPPO’s flagship MediaTek chip looks stronger for demanding performance, while Pixel’s Tensor advantage lies more in Google’s AI-focused software integration.

Battery and Charging

This is where OPPO pulls decisively ahead. Its 7500mAh silicon-carbon battery supports 80W wired and 50W wireless charging, alongside 10W reverse wireless charging. Pixel’s 5115mAh battery supports 45W wired and 25W magnetic wireless charging, plus bypass charging. OPPO offers substantially more endurance and faster charging, making it the more practical choice for heavy users.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro wins the specifications and battery section. Its Dimensity 9500, UFS 4.1 storage, massive 7500mAh battery, and faster charging create a stronger hardware package.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Pixel’s triple-camera system pairs a 50MP main camera with a 48MP 5x periscope and 48MP ultrawide. OPPO uses a 50MP main sensor, 200MP 3x periscope, and 50MP ultrawide. Pixel offers greater native telephoto reach, while OPPO’s enormous 200MP telephoto sensor promises stronger detail and cropping flexibility. For versatile zoom photography, both are unusually well equipped.

Selfie Camera

The Pixel features a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera with PDAF and 4K video recording, while OPPO uses a 50MP wide selfie camera with PDAF and 4K recording. Pixel’s wider perspective can suit group shots and framing, but OPPO’s higher-resolution sensor gives it a stronger hardware advantage. Pixel’s image processing could still make the real-world comparison closer.

Verdict

Pixel 11 Pro XL wins for its 5x optical telephoto and established computational photography approach. OPPO is the more exciting hardware package, particularly for users who prioritize detailed zoom and camera versatility.

Pricing

The Pixel 11 Pro XL is priced around $1300 or ₹135,000, while the OPPO Find X9 Pro is priced around $1000 or ₹100,000. That creates a significant gap between two premium phones with broadly comparable flagship ambitions. Pixel asks buyers to pay more for Google’s software ecosystem and longer update commitment.

Is the price justified? 

Pixel’s premium is easier to justify for buyers who prioritize seven major Android updates, Google’s AI features, Pixel photography, and a clean Android experience. OPPO offers substantially more battery capacity, faster charging, stronger storage, and an impressive 200MP telephoto for less money. For hardware-focused buyers, OPPO clearly offers better value.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro is the stronger value choice. Its lower price combined with a larger battery, faster charging, and impressive camera hardware makes the premium paid for Pixel harder to justify.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The Pixel 11 Pro XL stands out with seven major OS updates, Tensor G6, Google’s computational photography, 5x optical zoom, magnetic Qi2.2 charging, UWB, and Satellite SOS. OPPO counters with a 7500mAh silicon-carbon battery, 80W charging, 50W wireless charging, IP69 protection, an infrared port, and a 200MP periscope. Each targets a different definition of a flagship.

Verdict

OPPO Find X9 Pro is the overall winner. It delivers stronger hardware, dramatically better battery endurance, faster charging, excellent cameras, and lower pricing, making it the more complete value-focused flagship.

FAQs

1. Which phone has the better camera, Pixel 11 Pro XL or OPPO Find X9 Pro?
The Pixel excels at computational photography, while OPPO offers impressive zoom hardware and greater sensor resolution.

2. Is the OPPO Find X9 Pro faster than Pixel 11 Pro XL?
Yes. Its Dimensity 9500 is better suited to demanding gaming and sustained performance.

3. Which phone has better battery life?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro should last longer, thanks to its substantially larger 7500mAh battery.

4. Is Pixel 11 Pro XL worth the higher price?
It can be for buyers prioritizing Google’s software, AI features, camera processing, and longer update support.

5. Which phone should you buy overall?
Choose OPPO for hardware and value; choose Pixel for Google’s software experience and computational photography.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• iPhone Duo vs Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate: Apple vs the Wildest Foldable Yet
• iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?
• iPhone Duo vs iPhone 18 Pro Max: $2,000 Foldable or Smarter Buy?

The post Pixel 11 Pro XL vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Battery, Camera and Performance Compared appeared first on Gizmochina.

iPhone Duo and Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold represent two very different approaches to the next generation of foldables. Apple’s highly anticipated Duo brings a familiar iPhone experience into a foldable design, while Google’s Pixel 11 Pro Fold focuses on a larger inner screen, versatile cameras, and Android flexibility. For buyers considering premium foldables, this is a particularly interesting head-to-head.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The iPhone Duo takes a distinctly premium approach with a titanium frame, Ceramic Shield 2 glass, and a titanium hinge. It also carries an IP68 rating and supports stylus input. The Pixel 11 Pro Fold uses an aluminum frame, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the rear, and a glass-ceramic cover. Both feel flagship-grade, but Apple’s materials give the Duo a more luxurious character.

The biggest design difference appears when these phones are opened. The Duo has a wide 7.6-inch inner OLED with a subtle crease, while the Pixel offers an even larger 8-inch foldable OLED with a near-square aspect ratio. Both panels run at 120Hz and support HDR, but the Pixel reaches a higher 3600-nit peak brightness. Apple’s anti-reflective, nano-texture treatment should make the Duo particularly pleasant for reading and outdoor use.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 Pro Fold wins for sheer screen real estate, but the iPhone Duo feels like the more refined premium device, particularly for users who value Apple’s materials and display treatment.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The iPhone Duo uses Apple’s A20 Pro chip, built on a 2nm process, paired with 12GB RAM and storage options reaching 2TB. The Pixel 11 Pro Fold runs Google’s Tensor G6 on a 3nm process, with 16GB RAM and up to 1TB storage. Raw performance should favor Apple, while Google’s extra memory suits heavy multitasking.

Battery specifications reveal a more substantial advantage for Google. The Pixel packs a 4806mAh battery, supports 30W wired charging, 25W magnetic wireless charging, and bypass charging. Apple offers wired charging capable of reaching 50% in 20 minutes, alongside 25W MagSafe or Qi2 wireless charging. The Pixel’s bypass charging is a useful addition for demanding users who keep the phone plugged in for extended periods.

Verdict

The iPhone Duo looks stronger for performance, while the Pixel 11 Pro Fold offers the more practical battery package. For demanding multitaskers, Google’s approach feels more flexible.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The iPhone Duo features dual 48MP cameras, combining a wide sensor with a 120-degree ultrawide. Its video capabilities are particularly impressive, including 4K recording up to 120fps, Dolby Vision HDR, ProRes, and spatial video. The Pixel 11 Pro Fold counters with a triple-camera system featuring a 48MP main sensor, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, and 10.5MP ultrawide.

That dedicated telephoto gives the Pixel a clear advantage for zoom photography. Google also adds Pixel-focused features such as Best Take, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, and Zoom Enhance. Apple’s camera setup is less versatile on paper, but its video toolkit is considerably more advanced. For creators, the Duo’s combination of Dolby Vision, ProRes, and high-frame-rate recording is hard to overlook.

Selfie Camera

The Duo includes an under-display selfie camera plus a 12MP cover camera with autofocus, while the Pixel uses 10MP cameras on both the inner and cover displays. The Pixel offers a simpler, consistent setup, but Apple provides more flexibility across its displays.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 Pro Fold wins for photographic versatility and optical zoom, while the iPhone Duo is the stronger choice for serious video recording and content creation.

Pricing

The iPhone Duo is priced around $2,000 or ₹3,00,000, putting it firmly into ultra-premium territory. The Pixel 11 Pro Fold is priced around $1,900 or ₹1,87,000, making Google’s foldable notably more affordable despite offering more RAM and a larger inner display.

That difference matters because both phones target essentially the same luxury segment. The Pixel delivers a triple-camera system, 16GB RAM, 1TB storage, and a larger foldable panel for less money. The Duo, meanwhile, commands a substantial premium for Apple’s ecosystem, design language, software experience, and highly anticipated entry into foldables.

Is the price justified? 

The Duo’s price will make sense primarily for buyers already invested in Apple’s ecosystem or those specifically seeking Apple’s first major foldable experience. The Pixel is easier to justify purely on hardware value.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 Pro Fold offers better value for money, while the iPhone Duo is the more aspirational purchase. Apple’s premium makes sense mainly for buyers who specifically want the iPhone foldable experience.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The iPhone Duo stands out with its titanium construction, Ceramic Shield 2, nano-texture inner display, A20 Pro chip, 2TB storage option, advanced Dolby Vision and ProRes video, and MagSafe/Qi2 charging. It also brings the enormous excitement surrounding Apple’s long-awaited entry into foldables, making it arguably the hottest device in this comparison.

The Pixel 11 Pro Fold answers with an 8-inch inner screen, 16GB RAM, a 5x optical telephoto camera, 4806mAh battery, bypass charging, and up to seven major Android updates. It is the more feature-packed value proposition and arguably the more practical foldable for multitasking and photography. Yet the Duo feels like the more significant product, particularly for existing Apple users.

Verdict

Overall best: iPhone Duo — especially if the priority is the most premium and exciting foldable experience.
Best practical buy: Pixel 11 Pro Fold — it gives you more hardware for considerably less money.

FAQs

1. Which phone is better for everyday use?
The iPhone Duo offers a polished iOS experience, while the Pixel 11 Pro Fold excels at multitasking and Android customization.

2. Which phone is better for photography?
The Pixel 11 Pro Fold has the edge for photography thanks to its dedicated 5x telephoto and computational photography features.

3. Which phone is better for gaming and demanding apps?
The iPhone Duo should have the performance advantage, with the A20 Pro built on a newer 2nm process.

4. Which phone should you buy for longer battery use?
The Pixel 11 Pro Fold has a 4806mAh battery and bypass charging, making it better suited to extended heavy use.

5. Which foldable offers better value for money?
The Pixel 11 Pro Fold offers stronger hardware value, particularly with 16GB RAM, three cameras, and a significantly lower price.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold 8: Apple Finally Takes on Samsung
• Huawei Nova 16 SE vs Redmi Note 17 Pro: Specs, Camera, Battery & Price Compared
• iQOO 16 vs. OnePlus 16 camera specifications emerge: Which one would you choose?

The post iPhone Duo vs Pixel 11 Pro Fold: Apple or Google for Your Next Fold? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google Pixel 11 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro represent two different approaches to the premium smartphone experience. Both offer 6.3-inch 120Hz OLED displays, flagship processors, versatile triple-camera systems, and long-term software support. The Pixel leans into AI, computational photography, and Android flexibility, while the iPhone emphasizes performance, video capabilities, and a tightly integrated ecosystem.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Pixel 11 Pro combines Gorilla Glass Victus 2 with an aluminum frame and carries an IP68 rating. The iPhone 17 Pro uses Ceramic Shield 2 on the front, an aluminum frame, and improved water resistance up to 6 meters. Both feel suitably premium, but the iPhone’s construction feels more refined. The Pixel’s ultrasonic fingerprint sensor is a practical advantage, especially for users who prefer quick biometric unlocking.

Both phones also support advanced connectivity features, including Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, NFC, UWB, and USB-C. The Pixel offers a more conventional Android experience, while the iPhone benefits from Apple’s broader hardware and software integration. For everyday usability, the Pixel’s fingerprint authentication feels more convenient, while the iPhone remains the more cohesive ecosystem choice.

Display Quality

Both phones use 6.3-inch LTPO OLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates. The Pixel reaches a claimed 3,600-nit peak brightness and offers HDR10+, while the iPhone reaches 3,000 nits and adds Dolby Vision alongside HDR10. The Pixel has the sharper panel on paper, but Apple’s anti-reflective coating improves outdoor visibility.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 Pro wins narrowly for display brightness and biometric convenience, while the iPhone 17 Pro counters with excellent protection and stronger ecosystem integration.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 Pro uses Google’s Tensor G6 built on a 3nm process, paired with up to 16GB RAM. The iPhone 17 Pro uses Apple’s A19 Pro chip with 12GB RAM. Raw performance should favor the iPhone, particularly for demanding gaming and sustained workloads, while the Pixel’s hardware is optimized heavily around Google’s AI features and Android software.

The Pixel offers 256GB, 512GB, and 1TB storage options with UFS 4.x, while the iPhone provides the same capacities using NVMe storage. Both support seven major OS updates or extensive software support, but their priorities differ. The iPhone is the stronger choice for maximum processing performance, while Pixel hardware feels more purpose-built around AI-powered features.

Battery and Charging

The Pixel packs a 4,850mAh battery with 30W wired charging and 25W magnetic Qi2.2 wireless charging. The iPhone’s battery capacity varies by SIM configuration, while wired charging reaches 50% in 20 minutes and wireless charging supports up to 25W through MagSafe or Qi2. The Pixel has the larger battery, but Apple’s efficiency could narrow the practical gap.

The Pixel also supports reverse wired charging and bypass charging, giving it useful flexibility for accessories and sustained gaming. The iPhone responds with a more mature charging ecosystem. For charging versatility, the Pixel feels more practical, although neither phone offers class-leading wired charging speeds.

Verdict

The iPhone 17 Pro wins performance, while the Pixel 11 Pro takes the battery and charging versatility advantage. For power users, Apple’s chip is the stronger overall package.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Pixel 11 Pro features a 50MP main camera, 48MP ultrawide, and 48MP periscope telephoto with 5x optical zoom. The iPhone 17 Pro uses 48MP sensors across its main, ultrawide, and telephoto cameras, with 4x optical zoom. Pixel’s 5x telephoto gives it an advantage for distant subjects, while Google’s computational photography tools add features such as Best Take, Zoom Enhance, Pixel Shift, and Ultra-HDR.

The iPhone counters with a much stronger professional video toolkit. It supports 4K recording at up to 120fps, Dolby Vision HDR, ProRes, ProRes RAW, Apple Log 2, and spatial video. The Pixel can record 8K video and offers 10-bit HDR, making it highly capable for everyday shooting. Still, the iPhone is the more compelling option for serious mobile videography.

Selfie Camera

Google equips the Pixel with a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera supporting PDAF and 4K video at 60fps. The iPhone uses an 18MP multi-aspect camera with PDAF, alongside its SL 3D sensor system for Face ID and depth features. Pixel offers substantially higher resolution, while Apple’s system provides sophisticated biometric and video capabilities.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 Pro looks stronger for computational photography and zoom, but the iPhone 17 Pro is the better all-round camera phone, particularly for professional-quality video.

Pricing

The Google Pixel 11 Pro is priced around $1,100 / ₹120,000, while the iPhone 17 Pro is priced around $1,100 / ₹135,000. That makes the Pixel considerably more attractive in the Indian market, despite both sitting in the same premium flagship class internationally.

Both phones provide 256GB as the starting storage option and offer larger 512GB and 1TB configurations. The Pixel also brings 16GB RAM at higher capacities, while the iPhone stays at 12GB. However, Apple’s hardware-software optimization means RAM figures alone do not determine real-world performance.

Is the price justified? 

The Pixel’s lower Indian pricing makes its combination of a bright LTPO display, large battery, 5x telephoto camera, 16GB RAM, and extensive AI features particularly compelling. It delivers a lot of flagship hardware without pushing the price as aggressively.

The iPhone 17 Pro justifies its premium through the A19 Pro chip, advanced video recording, Face ID, MagSafe, and Apple’s wider ecosystem. For buyers already invested in Apple devices, the additional cost can make more sense. For most buyers comparing hardware directly, however, the Pixel offers better value.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 Pro is the clear value winner. Its lower price, larger battery, stronger telephoto specification, and generous memory make the overall package easier to recommend.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The Pixel 11 Pro stands out with its 3,600-nit display, 4,850mAh battery, 5x optical telephoto camera, ultrasonic fingerprint reader, 16GB RAM options, and Google-focused AI features. Its bypass charging and 25W Qi2.2 magnetic wireless charging add practical advantages that appeal to power users.

The iPhone 17 Pro counters with the A19 Pro chip, Face ID, LiDAR, MagSafe, Dolby Vision video, ProRes RAW, Apple Log 2, and spatial video capabilities. These features make it particularly attractive for creators and users already inside Apple’s ecosystem. However, the Pixel delivers a broader mix of hardware advantages for the money.

Verdict

Overall winner: Google Pixel 11 Pro. It offers the better combination of display, battery, zoom photography, AI features, charging flexibility, and value. The iPhone 17 Pro remains the better pick for performance, video, and Apple ecosystem users.

FAQs

1. Which phone is better for gaming, Pixel 11 Pro or iPhone 17 Pro?
The iPhone 17 Pro is better for gaming, thanks to the A19 Pro chip and stronger graphics performance.

2. Which phone takes better zoom photos?
The Pixel 11 Pro offers better zoom flexibility with its 5x optical periscope telephoto camera.

3. Which phone charges faster?
The iPhone 17 Pro reaches 50% in about 20 minutes with compatible wired charging.

4. Which phone is better for battery-heavy users?
The Pixel 11 Pro is better suited to heavy users, thanks to its larger battery and bypass charging support.

5. Which phone is better for long-term value?
The Pixel 11 Pro offers stronger hardware value, while the iPhone can be more valuable within Apple’s ecosystem.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• Samsung Galaxy S26 FE vs Google Pixel 11: Is Pixel Worth $200 More?
• Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs Motorola Razr Fold: Specs, Cameras, Battery and Price Compared
• Google Pixel 11 vs Samsung Galaxy S26: Camera, Performance, Battery Compared

The post Pixel 11 Pro vs iPhone 17 Pro: Which $1,100 Flagship Wins? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google’s Pixel Tablet may have reached the end of its short run. The three-year-old device has started disappearing from Google’s online presence, with some key signs pointing towards its discontinuation. The changes also raise fresh questions about whether Google plans to return to the tablet market with another Pixel-branded device.

Pixel Tablet disappears from Google Store

The Pixel Tablet has been removed from the Google Store, while Google has also taken down the Tablet category from its main navigation menu. A direct link to the tablet’s product page now redirects to the Google Store homepage, making it difficult to find any official trace of the device.

The tablet was already marked out of stock before Google removed its listing completely. Its dedicated accessories remain visible, including the Pixel Tablet Case and Charging Speaker Dock, although most are unavailable. Third-party availability also appears to have dried up, with Amazon showing no stock and Best Buy listing the device as no longer available in new condition.

Google introduced the Pixel Tablet in 2023 as a hybrid device that could work as a conventional Android tablet and a smart home display when placed on its charging speaker dock. It launched at $499 in the US, with the dock sold separately, and became the only tablet in Google’s current hardware lineup.

A successor was reportedly considered, with the Pixel Tablet 2 said to have been planned with upgrades such as a 120Hz display and 4K external display support. However, Google reportedly cancelled those plans over profitability concerns. A possible third-generation model was also said to have been shelved.

Interestingly, Google had promised software updates for the Pixel Tablet through June 2028. While the company has not clearly stated whether that support commitment will change, the removal from its store makes a second-generation model look increasingly unlikely for now. For existing owners, the bigger question is how Google handles support after ending sales.

For daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

The post RIP Pixel Tablet: Google quietly pulls the plug after just three years appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE and Google Pixel 11 take different approaches to the premium Android experience. Samsung focuses on strong all-round hardware and value, while Google leans into cameras and smart features. But with a significant price gap between them, which phone actually offers the better package ?

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE uses a glass front and back with Gorilla Glass Victus+ and an aluminum frame, giving it a familiar premium Galaxy feel. The Pixel 11 also combines glass panels with an aluminum frame, but upgrades to Gorilla Glass Victus 2. Both phones carry IP68 protection, making either suitable for everyday exposure to dust and water.

Display Quality

Samsung uses a Dynamic AMOLED 2X panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and up to 1900 nits HBM brightness. The Pixel 11 counters with a 120Hz OLED display supporting HDR10+ and up to 2000 nits HBM brightness, with a higher peak brightness figure. The Pixel feels slightly more compelling for outdoor visibility, while Samsung offers a larger viewing canvas.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 wins narrowly for display brightness and newer glass protection, but the Galaxy S26 FE remains attractive for users who prefer a larger screen. Samsung’s AMOLED technology also makes it a particularly strong choice for multimedia and everyday scrolling.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Galaxy S26 FE runs Android 17 with Samsung’s Exynos 2500 chipset, Xclipse 950 graphics, and 8GB RAM across its storage options. The Pixel 11 uses Google’s Tensor G6 with 12GB RAM and UFS 4.x storage. Both promise modern flagship-class hardware, but the Pixel’s larger memory allocation gives it a more comfortable specification sheet for multitasking and long-term use.

Battery and Charging

Samsung packs a 4900mAh battery with 45W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, Qi2 compatibility, and reverse wireless charging. The Pixel 11 has a slightly larger 4985mAh battery, although wired charging drops to 30W. It adds 25W magnetic wireless charging, Qi2.2, reverse wired charging, and bypass charging. Samsung feels better for conventional charging speed, while Pixel offers more modern charging flexibility.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 takes the specification advantage with more RAM and a slightly larger battery, while Samsung wins on wired charging speed. For overall flexibility, Pixel’s broader charging features make it the more interesting package.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Galaxy S26 FE features a 50MP main camera with OIS, an 8MP telephoto with 3x optical zoom, and a 12MP ultrawide. The Pixel 11 uses a 48MP main camera, a 10.8MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, and a 13MP ultrawide with autofocus. Samsung offers a strong all-round setup, but Pixel’s longer optical zoom gives it a clear advantage for distant subjects.

Selfie Camera

Samsung equips the Galaxy S26 FE with a 12MP front camera supporting 4K video at up to 60fps, along with gyro-EIS and HDR10+. The Pixel 11 has a 10.5MP ultrawide selfie camera with autofocus and similar 4K recording support. Samsung’s higher resolution looks appealing on paper, while Pixel’s wider perspective and autofocus make it more versatile for group selfies and video calls.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 is the stronger camera phone overall, mainly because of its 5x optical telephoto and more advanced imaging features. Samsung remains competitive, especially with its 8K recording capability and higher-resolution selfie camera.

Pricing

The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE is priced around $700 / ₹70,000, while the Google Pixel 11 is priced around $900 / ₹90,000. That puts the Pixel in a notably higher price bracket, making the Samsung considerably more accessible for buyers who want a premium Android phone without stretching the budget as far.

Is the price justified? 

The Pixel 11 justifies part of its premium with 12GB RAM, a more capable telephoto camera, newer wireless charging support, and several distinctive software and hardware features. However, Samsung delivers a 120Hz AMOLED display, 45W charging, versatile cameras, and DeX support for substantially less. For value-focused buyers, the Galaxy feels easier to recommend.

Verdict

Samsung wins on value, offering a more affordable route to premium features. Pixel’s higher price makes sense mainly for buyers who specifically want its camera capabilities, extra RAM, and Google-focused feature set.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.

Conclusion

The Galaxy S26 FE stands out with Samsung DeX, wireless DeX support, 45W wired charging, 8K video recording, and a balanced triple-camera system. The Pixel 11 counters with satellite SOS, 5x optical zoom, a 12GB RAM configuration, magnetic Qi2.2 charging, bypass charging, and a more advanced connectivity package.

The two phones therefore target slightly different buyers. Samsung feels more practical for users who want strong hardware, faster wired charging, desktop-style DeX functionality, and better value. Pixel is more appealing to photography-focused users and those who value Google’s distinctive software-driven features. The choice ultimately depends on whether price or specialized capabilities matter more.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE is the overall winner because it delivers a stronger value proposition, faster wired charging, versatile hardware, and useful extras at a substantially lower price. The Pixel 11 is better for camera-focused buyers, but Samsung offers the more complete package for most users.

FAQs

Which phone is better for everyday use?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE offers the better balance of features, charging, and price for most everyday users.

Which phone has the better camera?
The Google Pixel 11 has the stronger camera setup, particularly for zoom photography and versatile shooting.

Which phone offers better performance?
The Google Pixel 11 has 12GB RAM and the Tensor G6, giving it a stronger overall hardware configuration.

Which phone has better battery and charging?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE supports faster 45W wired charging, while the Pixel 11 offers more advanced wireless charging.

Which phone is better value for money?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE is better value, offering premium features at a significantly lower starting price.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs Motorola Razr Fold: Specs, Cameras, Battery and Price Compared
• iQOO 16 vs. OnePlus 16 camera specifications emerge: Which one would you choose?
• Vivo X300 E vs OnePlus 15: Which Flagship Smartphone Is Better?

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 FE vs Google Pixel 11: Is Pixel Worth $200 More? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Foldables are no longer just about having a bigger screen in your pocket. The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Motorola Razr Fold take different approaches to the premium foldable experience, with Google focusing on software and smart features while Motorola pushes performance, cameras, charging, and versatility. Here’s how the two compare. 

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold combines a glass-ceramic front, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 back, and aluminum frame with IP68 protection. Motorola Razr Fold uses a similarly premium construction and offers IP48/IP49 water resistance, plus stylus support. Motorola’s added stylus compatibility makes it more versatile for productivity, while Pixel’s higher dust and water protection inspires greater confidence for everyday use.

Display Quality

Pixel 11 Pro Fold features an 8-inch foldable LTPO OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and up to 3,600 nits peak brightness. Its 6.5-inch cover display also reaches 3,600 nits. Razr Fold counters with an 8.1-inch LTPO P-OLED panel, 120Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, and an impressive 6,200 nits peak brightness. Its 6.6-inch cover screen adds 165Hz.

Verdict

Motorola wins on brightness, cover-screen smoothness, and stylus support, while Pixel offers stronger protection. For a more feature-rich display experience, Razr Fold feels like the better overall choice.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 Pro Fold runs Android 17 with Google’s Tensor G6 built on a 3nm process, paired with 16GB RAM and up to 1TB storage. Motorola uses the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, with up to 16GB RAM and 1TB UFS 4.1 storage. The Snapdragon platform gives Razr Fold a more performance-focused edge, particularly for demanding workloads and gaming.

Battery and Charging

Pixel packs a 4,806mAh battery with 30W wired charging, 25W magnetic wireless charging through Qi2.2, PPS support, and bypass charging. Razr Fold has a larger 6,000mAh silicon-carbon lithium-ion battery, 80W wired charging, 50W wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging. Motorola’s charging hardware is clearly more aggressive and better suited to users who frequently need quick top-ups.

Verdict

Razr Fold takes the performance and charging lead with Snapdragon power, a larger battery, and faster charging. Pixel’s newer software and bypass charging remain useful, but Motorola offers the stronger hardware package.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Pixel 11 Pro Fold uses a 48MP main camera with OIS, a 10.8MP 5x optical telephoto camera, and a 10.5MP ultrawide lens with a 127-degree field of view. Features include Best Take, Zoom Enhance, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, and laser autofocus. Razr Fold instead offers three 50MP cameras, including a 3x periscope telephoto and 122-degree ultrawide. Its 8K Dolby Vision recording gives it a major video advantage.

Selfie Camera

Pixel includes 10MP selfie and cover cameras, both supporting 4K video. Razr Fold steps up to a 32MP internal selfie camera and 20MP cover camera, with 4K recording. Motorola therefore offers higher-resolution selfie hardware, while Pixel’s camera processing features can be more appealing for computational photography.

Verdict

Razr Fold delivers stronger camera hardware and more advanced video recording, while Pixel brings useful computational photography tools. For overall versatility, Motorola’s triple-50MP setup feels more compelling.

Pricing

The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is priced around $1,900 / ₹1,87,000, while the Motorola Razr Fold is priced around $1,900 / ₹1,50,000. That makes Motorola considerably cheaper in the Indian market despite offering a Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 chipset, larger battery, faster charging, and a powerful triple-50MP camera system.

Is the Price Justified?

Pixel’s premium is easier to understand for buyers prioritizing Google’s software experience, Android 17, long-term updates, Qi2.2 magnetic charging, and IP68 protection. However, Motorola provides more hardware value for the money, particularly with its brighter displays, stylus support, faster charging, and larger battery.

Verdict

At similar US pricing but a substantially lower Indian price, Razr Fold offers stronger value. Pixel remains attractive for Google’s software ecosystem, but Motorola provides more hardware for the asking price.

Conclusion

The Pixel 11 Pro Fold stands out with Android 17, seven major OS updates, IP68 protection, Tensor G6, Qi2.2 magnetic wireless charging, bypass charging, UWB, Satellite SOS, and Google-focused camera features such as Best Take and Zoom Enhance. Razr Fold counters with stylus support, Dolby Vision displays, a 165Hz cover screen, Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 8K Dolby Vision video, and 80W wired charging.

Verdict

Motorola Razr Fold is the better overall choice, offering stronger performance, cameras, battery life, faster charging, brighter displays, and better value for money. The Pixel 11 Pro Fold makes more sense for buyers who prioritize Google’s software experience and long-term ecosystem features. 

FAQs

1. Which phone is better for photography?
Motorola offers more versatile camera hardware, while Google’s computational photography features can improve everyday shots.

2. Which foldable has better performance?
Motorola delivers stronger raw performance and is better suited for gaming and demanding apps.

3. Which phone has better battery life?
Motorola’s larger battery should provide better endurance, especially for heavy daily use.

4. Which foldable offers better value for money?
Motorola offers better value, particularly with its faster charging, larger battery, and higher-end hardware.

5. Which phone should you buy overall?
Motorola is the stronger all-rounder for buyers prioritizing performance, cameras, charging, and hardware value.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• Google Pixel 11 vs Samsung Galaxy S26: Camera, Performance, Battery Compared
• iQOO 16 vs. OnePlus 16 camera specifications emerge: Which one would you choose?
• Pixel 11 Pro vs Galaxy S26 Ultra: Which Premium Phone Should You Buy?

The post Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs Motorola Razr Fold: Specs, Cameras, Battery and Price Compared appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google and Samsung are going head-to-head once again with two compact flagship smartphones packed with premium features. The Google Pixel 11 focuses on AI, photography, and battery versatility, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 brings flagship performance, a refined design, and powerful productivity features. So, which one offers the better value for your money? Let’s find out. 

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Google Pixel 11 and Samsung Galaxy S26 both feature premium glass-and-aluminum constructions with IP68 water and dust resistance. The Galaxy S26 feels noticeably slimmer and lighter, making it the more comfortable option for extended everyday use. The Pixel 11, however, offers a more substantial in-hand feel and adds Satellite SOS support.

Display Quality

Both phones feature sharp 6.3-inch OLED displays with smooth 120Hz refresh rates and HDR10+ support. The Pixel 11 delivers higher peak brightness and a slightly sharper resolution, while the Galaxy S26 uses Dynamic LTPO AMOLED technology and offers a higher screen-to-body ratio. Samsung’s panel looks like the more polished choice for immersive viewing.

Verdict

Choose the Galaxy S26 for its slimmer, lighter design and immersive LTPO display. The Pixel 11 remains a strong alternative with excellent brightness, premium protection, and useful satellite connectivity.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 runs Android 17 on Google’s Tensor G6 chipset with 12GB RAM, focusing on AI-driven experiences and long-term software support. The Galaxy S26 offers Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processors depending on the region. Samsung’s hardware should provide stronger raw performance, particularly for demanding games and intensive multitasking.

Battery and Charging

The Pixel 11 features a larger battery and supports faster 30W wired charging, 25W magnetic wireless charging, reverse wired charging, and bypass charging. The Galaxy S26 offers slower wired and wireless charging, although it includes reverse wireless charging. On paper, the Pixel provides the more versatile charging setup.

Verdict

The Galaxy S26 should appeal to users prioritizing maximum performance, while the Pixel 11 offers a more compelling battery and charging package. For balanced everyday usability, Google’s approach feels particularly practical.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Pixel 11 uses a 48MP main camera, 5x optical telephoto lens, and 120-degree ultrawide camera. The Galaxy S26 counters with a 50MP main camera, 3x telephoto, and 12MP ultrawide lens. Pixel’s longer optical zoom gives it an advantage for distant subjects, while Samsung adds 8K video recording and stronger video-oriented features.

Selfie Camera

The Galaxy S26 has a 12MP autofocus selfie camera with 4K video recording, while the Pixel 11 uses a wider 10.5MP front camera. The Pixel may be more useful for group selfies, whereas Samsung’s camera appears better suited for standard portraits and detailed front-facing video.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 looks stronger for zoom photography, while the Galaxy S26 offers greater video flexibility. Users who value versatile photography may prefer Pixel, whereas video creators could lean toward Samsung.

Pricing

The Google Pixel 11 is priced around $900 / ₹90,000, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 is priced around $900 / ₹88,000. Their pricing is extremely close, making features and ecosystem preferences more important than cost alone. The Galaxy S26 offers flagship-level performance and a refined design, while the Pixel focuses on cameras, battery capacity, and charging versatility.

Is the Price Justified?

Both phones justify their premium pricing with flagship displays, powerful chipsets, advanced camera systems, and seven major Android updates. The Galaxy feels like the better value for users seeking maximum performance, while the Pixel’s stronger zoom and battery features help balance its slightly higher Indian price.

Verdict

With only a small price difference, neither phone has a decisive affordability advantage. The Galaxy S26 offers excellent hardware value, while the Pixel 11 justifies its premium through versatility and features.

Conclusion

The Pixel 11 stands out with its 5x optical zoom, larger battery, magnetic wireless charging, Satellite SOS service, and Google’s AI-focused Tensor platform. The Galaxy S26 brings faster flagship-class processing, Samsung DeX, Wireless DeX, Wi-Fi 7, 8K video, and a lighter design. Both receive long-term software support, making them suitable for buyers planning to keep their phone for several years.

The choice ultimately comes down to priorities. Pixel feels better suited to users who value computational photography, battery capacity, and Google-centric software. Samsung is the more compelling all-rounder for raw performance, productivity, and multimedia features.

Verdict

Overall, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is the better choice for most buyers, thanks to its stronger performance, refined display, slimmer design, advanced video features, and productivity tools. The Google Pixel 11 is still worth considering for its superior zoom camera and battery setup, but at a similar price, the Galaxy S26 delivers the more complete flagship experience. 

FAQs

1. Which is better, Pixel 11 or Galaxy S26?

The Galaxy S26 is the better overall choice for most users, offering stronger performance and broader flagship features.

2. Which phone has the better camera?

The Pixel 11 offers better long-range zoom, while the Galaxy S26 provides stronger video capabilities and a versatile overall camera experience.

3. Is the Galaxy S26 faster than the Pixel 11?

Yes, the Galaxy S26 offers stronger raw performance, especially for demanding games, multitasking, and intensive applications.

4. Which phone has better battery life?

The Pixel 11 has a larger battery and more versatile charging options, potentially making it the better choice for heavy users.

5. Which offers better value for money?

The Galaxy S26 offers better overall value for most buyers, while the Pixel 11 provides greater appeal for photography-focused users.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• Google Pixel 11 Pro XL vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max: Which Flagship Truly Wins?
• Pixel 11 Pro vs Galaxy S26 Ultra: Which Premium Phone Should You Buy?
• iQOO Z11 vs Realme 16x 5G: Which Phone Offers Better Value?

The post Google Pixel 11 vs Samsung Galaxy S26: Camera, Performance, Battery Compared appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL and iPhone 17 Pro Max represent one of the biggest flagship battles of the year, putting Google’s AI-powered photography and smart software against Apple’s industry-leading performance and professional video tools. Both promise a no-compromise premium experience, but only one can deliver the better overall package. From cameras and battery life to display quality, performance, and value, this comparison reveals which flagship truly deserves the top spot.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

Both phones offer premium glass-and-metal construction with IP68 protection. The Pixel 11 Pro XL uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the front and back, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max features Ceramic Shield protection and an aluminium-based design. Apple’s phone also offers deeper water resistance. The Pixel feels more Android-centric in its hardware approach, while the iPhone’s familiar premium design remains highly polished.

Display Quality

The Pixel 11 Pro XL features a sharp LTPO OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate and an impressive peak brightness of 3,600 nits. The iPhone 17 Pro Max counters with a 120Hz Super Retina XDR OLED display, Dolby Vision and an anti-reflective coating. Both displays should excel outdoors, but the Pixel’s higher peak brightness gives it a slight advantage on paper.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 Pro XL wins slightly for display specifications and brightness, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max offers stronger screen protection and excellent HDR capabilities.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 Pro XL runs Android 17 on Google’s Tensor G6 chipset and promises up to seven major OS updates. The iPhone 17 Pro Max uses Apple’s A19 Pro chip and runs iOS 26. Apple’s hardware traditionally has a stronger edge in sustained performance, demanding games and professional workloads. The Pixel, however, should appeal more to users who value Google’s AI features and Android flexibility.

Battery and Charging

Google equips the Pixel with a larger 5,115mAh battery, 45W wired charging, 25W Qi2.2 magnetic wireless charging and bypass charging. The iPhone supports fast wired charging, 25W MagSafe/Qi2 wireless charging and reverse wired charging. The Pixel’s charging setup looks more versatile, especially for power users who regularly charge while gaming or working.

Verdict

The iPhone 17 Pro Max is the stronger performance-focused flagship, but the Pixel 11 Pro XL offers the more compelling battery capacity and charging package on paper.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Both phones feature versatile triple-camera systems with 48MP-class secondary sensors. The Pixel 11 Pro XL offers a 50MP main camera, 48MP ultrawide and a 48MP 5x periscope telephoto lens, alongside features such as Best Take and Zoom Enhance. The iPhone uses three 48MP cameras, a 4x telephoto lens and a LiDAR scanner. The Pixel appears better suited to flexible photography, while Apple’s system looks especially powerful for professional video.

Selfie Camera

The Pixel packs a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera with autofocus and a wide field of view. The iPhone uses an 18MP multi-aspect front camera with advanced depth sensing and Face ID integration. Pixel’s hardware should offer greater flexibility for group selfies, while Apple’s video-focused front camera features remain attractive for creators.

Verdict

Choose the Pixel 11 Pro XL for versatile photography and longer optical zoom. The iPhone 17 Pro Max is the stronger choice for professional video recording and advanced creative formats.

Pricing

The Google Pixel 11 Pro XL is priced around $1,300 / ₹1,35,000, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max is priced around $1,200 / ₹1,50,000. At these premium prices, both phones sit firmly in the ultra-flagship category. The Pixel offers strong value through its seven-year update promise, versatile cameras, bright display and advanced charging features. The iPhone justifies its price through the A19 Pro’s performance, polished ecosystem and professional-grade video capabilities.

The better value ultimately depends heavily on the preferred operating system and existing ecosystem. Neither is a budget-friendly flagship, but both offer genuinely premium hardware rather than relying solely on branding.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 Pro XL appears to offer better hardware value, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max can justify its premium for users invested in Apple’s ecosystem.

Conclusion

The Pixel 11 Pro XL stands out with its extremely bright display, 5x optical zoom, advanced computational photography tools, seven major Android updates, and versatile charging features. The iPhone 17 Pro Max counters with the powerful A19 Pro chipset, polished iOS experience, LiDAR sensor, and exceptional video capabilities, including ProRes RAW and Apple Log 2. These phones are not simply competing on specifications; they are built around two distinctly different user experiences.

Verdict

Overall, the iPhone 17 Pro Max is the better flagship thanks to its superior performance, professional-grade video capabilities, and polished ecosystem. However, the Pixel 11 Pro XL offers better value for Android users with its brighter display, versatile cameras, larger battery, and faster charging. 

FAQs

1. Which phone is better for photography?
The Pixel offers stronger computational photography and longer optical zoom, making it better for versatile photography.

2. Which phone delivers better performance?
The iPhone 17 Pro Max delivers stronger raw performance for demanding apps, gaming and professional workloads.

3. Which phone has better battery life?
The Pixel has a larger battery and faster charging, though real-world battery performance may vary.

4. Which offers better value for money?
The Pixel 11 Pro XL offers more competitive hardware and features for its approximate price.

5. Which phone is better overall?
The iPhone 17 Pro Max is the better overall flagship, particularly for performance and professional video features.

Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.

Read More:

• Pixel 11 Pro vs Galaxy S26 Ultra: Which Premium Phone Should You Buy?
• Anker 165W vs UGREEN 200W Power Bank: Which 25000mAh Power Bank Should You Buy?
• Light Flip 5G vs Nokia 2660 Flip 4G: Is It Worth Paying 5x More For a Premium Dumb Phone?

The post Google Pixel 11 Pro XL vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max: Which Flagship Truly Wins? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google Pixel 11 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra represent two very different approaches to the ultimate Android flagship. The Pixel brings Google’s AI-driven software experience, advanced camera processing, and a more compact premium design, while Samsung’s Ultra packs in powerful hardware, a larger display, faster charging, versatile cameras, and productivity-focused features. Both are designed for buyers who want the very best, but which one offers the better overall experience, and more importantly, which flagship truly deserves your money? 

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Google Pixel 11 Pro offers a more compact and manageable flagship experience, with a premium glass-and-aluminum construction and IP68 protection. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra also delivers flagship durability but adds Gorilla Armor 2 protection, an anti-reflective coating, and an integrated stylus. The Pixel should feel more comfortable for users who prefer smaller premium phones, while the Samsung is better suited to those wanting a more feature-packed device.

Display Quality

The Pixel 11 Pro features a sharp LTPO OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and impressive peak brightness. The Galaxy S26 Ultra goes further with its larger Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X panel, higher resolution, Privacy Display, and anti-reflective coating. Samsung’s screen feels more immersive for entertainment and productivity.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 Pro is the better choice for users wanting a compact flagship, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra wins with a larger, more advanced display and additional productivity features.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Pixel 11 Pro is powered by Google’s Tensor G6 chipset and runs Android 17 with up to seven major OS updates. The Galaxy S26 Ultra uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset, paired with an Adreno 840 GPU. Both offer generous storage and RAM configurations, but Samsung’s hardware is likely to appeal more to demanding gamers and power users.

Battery and Charging

The Pixel 11 Pro packs a 4,850mAh battery with 30W wired charging, 25W magnetic wireless charging, and reverse wired charging. The Galaxy S26 Ultra has a larger 5,000mAh battery and significantly faster 60W wired charging, alongside 25W wireless and reverse wireless charging. Samsung clearly offers the more convenient charging setup.

Verdict

The Pixel provides strong everyday performance and useful charging features, but the Galaxy S26 Ultra offers more raw power, a slightly larger battery, and considerably faster wired charging.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Pixel 11 Pro uses a triple-camera system with a 50MP primary sensor, 48MP ultrawide camera, and 48MP 5x periscope telephoto lens. The Galaxy S26 Ultra counters with a versatile quad-camera setup, including a 200MP main camera and separate 3x and 5x zoom lenses. Samsung offers greater focal-length flexibility, while Google’s image processing could appeal to photography enthusiasts.

Selfie Camera

Google equips the Pixel with a 42MP ultrawide selfie camera offering a wider field of view and autofocus. The Galaxy uses a 12MP front camera with dual-pixel autofocus and HDR10+ video support. The Pixel’s hardware looks more flexible for group selfies, while Samsung focuses on a more conventional flagship implementation.

Verdict

The Galaxy S26 Ultra offers greater camera versatility, especially across different zoom ranges, but the Pixel 11 Pro remains highly compelling for computational photography and ultrawide selfie capabilities.

Pricing

The Google Pixel 11 Pro is priced around $1,100 / ₹1,20,000, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is priced around $1,300 / ₹1,40,000. The Pixel costs noticeably less while still offering flagship cameras, a premium display, and long-term software support. Its pricing feels more balanced for buyers who do not need Samsung’s larger screen or additional hardware features.

The Galaxy S26 Ultra is more expensive, but its higher price brings a more powerful chipset, advanced display protection, faster charging, a quad-camera system, DeX support, and an integrated stylus. The premium is easier to justify for users who will actually use these extras.

Verdict

The Pixel 11 Pro offers stronger value for most buyers, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra justifies its higher price mainly for power users seeking maximum versatility and productivity.

Conclusion

Google Pixel 11 Pro stands out with Android 17, Tensor-powered AI features, satellite SOS, a high-resolution ultrawide selfie camera, and Google’s photography tools such as Best Take and Zoom Enhance. The Galaxy S26 Ultra counters with an integrated stylus, Samsung DeX, Privacy Display, anti-reflective screen technology, faster charging, and a more versatile quad-camera system.

The Pixel feels like a more focused and practical flagship, especially for users who prefer Google’s clean software and camera processing. However, Samsung offers a more complete hardware package with fewer compromises across performance, display quality, charging, and productivity.

Verdict

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is the better smartphone overall, thanks to its superior performance, larger and more advanced display, faster charging, versatile camera system, and productivity features. However, the Pixel 11 Pro remains the better value choice for users who want a compact flagship and Google’s software experience.

FAQs

1. Which phone offers better value for money?
The Pixel 11 Pro costs less and delivers premium features, making it the better value for most buyers.

2. Which phone has the better camera?
The Galaxy S26 Ultra offers greater camera versatility with its 200MP sensor and dual telephoto system.

3. Which phone performs better for gaming?
The Galaxy S26 Ultra offers stronger raw performance and is better suited for demanding games and intensive tasks.

4. Which phone has better battery and charging?
The Galaxy S26 Ultra has a slightly larger battery and significantly faster 60W wired charging.

5. Which phone is the overall winner?
The Galaxy S26 Ultra is the more complete flagship, while the Pixel 11 Pro remains a strong value-focused alternative.

Read More:

• Anker 165W vs UGREEN 200W Power Bank: Which 25000mAh Power Bank Should You Buy?
• Light Flip 5G vs Nokia 2660 Flip 4G: Is It Worth Paying 5x More For a Premium Dumb Phone?
• Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8: Specs, Camera and Price Compared

The post Pixel 11 Pro vs Galaxy S26 Ultra: Which Premium Phone Should You Buy? appeared first on Gizmochina.

The new Tensor G6 chipset is out, and many of you may be wondering how it compares with Qualcomm’s high-end Snapdragon chips. We recently compared it to the latest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, and the latter was significantly ahead in raw performance. So, we decided to give it another shot, but this time with the Snapdragon 8 Elite.

The Tensor G6 brings significant upgrades to on-device AI processing efficiency, computational photography, and core power management. The CPU gets a unique 7-core architecture featuring newer ARM cores, and the switch to the 3nm node delivers much better power efficiency.

In short, the Tensor G6 isn’t a yearly release with incremental upgrades, but it actually brings significant changes. But the real question here is: can it beat the Snapdragon 8 Elite? Let’s find out.

Let’s begin with the spec sheet.

Tensor G6 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite: Benchmark scores

Geekbench score

On Geekbench 6, the Pixel 11 Pro XL, powered by Tensor G6, achieves a 2,671 score in the single-core test and 6,802 in the multi-core test. In comparison, the Snapdragon 8 Elite-powered Galaxy S25 Plus gets 3008 single-core points, a 12% increase, but the gap becomes a lot wider in the multi-core performance.

The Snapdragon chip gets 9730 multi-core points, a massive 43% higher score than Tensor G6. This means devices powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite should perform much better during heavy workloads, such as processing complex data and handling multiple apps, compared to Tensor G6-powered Pixel 11 series.

AnTuTu score

The AnTuTu benchmark (v11) also shows much stronger numbers for the Snapdragon 8 Elite compared to Tensor G6. The total score is up by over 70% (3.16 million vs 1.85 million). Its breakdown reveals a clearer, more interesting picture.

The Snapdragon 8 Elite gets a 22% higher CPU score, but the GPU score is up by a massive 177% compared to the Tensor G6. That makes one thing absolutely clear: the Snapdragon 8 Elite is a far superior choice for high-end gaming than Tensor G6. The 3DMark test also proves this.

The chip also benefits from 36% higher memory performance and 71% better UX performance, as suggested by the AnTuTu benchmark.

3DMark score

Wild Life Extreme Stress Test

The test measures how well a device maintains its graphical performance and manages heat over an extensive period of demanding 3D sequences. This is a much more precise gaming test than AnTuTu’s GPU test.

On the benchmark, the Tensor G6 achieves an overall score of 3386, while the Snapdragon 8 Elite is far ahead with a score of 6612. That’s a 95% difference, which is massive. The Snapdragon chip also delivers a much higher average FPS (39.48 vs 20.31).

The Snapdragon 8 Elite absolutely outclasses the Tensor G6 across multiple benchmarks. That highlights fundamentally different design philosophies between Google and Qualcomm.

The Snapdragon 8 Elite prioritizes peak performance, heavy sustained loads, and long gaming sessions at a high frame rate. On the other hand, Tensor chips, including the Tensor G4, use a conservative CPU/GPU configuration to keep thermal output and power draw low, and allocate silicon area and power budgets to TPU and ISP for on-device AI workloads and real-time computational photography.

Tensor G6 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite: Differences that matter

One of the major changes to Tensor G6 is the switch to a 7-core CPU. All previous tensor chips have an 8-core CPU. While this may sound like a CPU downgrade, it actually isn’t. The latest chip uses ARM’s newer C1-Ultra and C1-Pro series, which deliver better performance and power efficiency. Plus, increased clock speeds help the Tensor G6 achieve 20% faster web browsing and 15% faster app launches than the Tensor G5.

Despite the increased performance, the Snapdragon 8 Elite still remains a superior choice in CPU performance. It has an 8-core CPU featuring custom Oryon cores running at higher clock speeds.

Google hasn’t commented on why the Tensor G6 has a 7-core CPU. However, industry experts believe it was done to accommodate the massive fifth-generation TPU, which powers the upgraded Gemini Nano on-device AI models on the Pixel 11 series. The Snapdragon 8 Elite relies on a Hexagon NPU, which enables multimodal Gen AI capabilities.

The Tensor G6 features a PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 GPU, which isn’t as powerful as the Adreno 840 on the Snapdragon 8 Elite. The Adreno GPU also utilizes various software enhancements and gaming optimizations to deliver a far superior gaming experience.

Both chips come with a modern, future-proof connectivity stack to offer reliable connectivity, even in crowded areas. In terms of peak 5G download speed, the Tensor G6 is slightly ahead. It offers up to 12 Gbps of peak speed (vs. 10 Gbps on the Snapdragon 8 Elite).

Tensor G6 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite: Which is better for you?

The choice is pretty straightforward.

• Choose Snapdragon 8 Elite: if you prioritize raw power and top-tier gaming performance at higher frame rates.
• Choose Tensor G6: if you prioritize personal AI agents, and Google’s AI-powered features like Magic Eraser, real-time Live Translate, and Google’s computational photography magic.

Best Tensor G6 phones:

• Google Pixel 11
• Google Pixel 11 Pro
• Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
• Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold

Best Snapdragon 8 Elite phones:

• Galaxy S25 Ultra
• Xiaomi 15 Ultra
• OnePlus 13
• Realme GT 7 Pro
• Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro

The post Tensor G6 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite: Benchmark scores, spec sheet, and more appeared first on Gizmochina.

Google’s September Android Drop is bringing a handful of new features designed to make everyday smartphone use a little more convenient. The latest additions cover misplaced belongings, motion sickness, accessibility, and messaging, giving users more ways to get things done without relying on separate apps.

The update includes five notable features across Gemini, Find Hub, Google Messages, and Android itself. Some are already rolling out, while others require newer Android versions or will arrive soon, so here’s a closer look at what Google is bringing to compatible devices.

Gemini can remember where you left things

One of the more practical additions connects Gemini with Find Hub, allowing users to save the location of items that do not have a tracker attached. You can tell Gemini where you put something such as a passport or spare key, optionally add a photo, and later ask where it was stored. The feature is coming to Android 16 and newer in countries where Gemini and Find Hub are supported.

Motion Assist targets motion sickness

Android 17 is getting Motion Assist, which places a moving bubble overlay on the display when you are traveling in a vehicle. The visual cue is designed to reduce the mismatch between what your eyes see on the screen and the movement detected by your body. Users can enable it automatically or through Quick Settings and customise the bubble’s appearance.

Guided vision brings camera-based assistance

Guided vision is designed for blind and low-vision users through Gemini Live. By sharing the phone’s camera, users can receive spoken descriptions of nearby objects, fine print, menus, and other surroundings. Voice guidance can also help position the camera correctly. The feature is coming to Android 9 and newer where Gemini is available.

Google Keep moves into Messages

Google Messages is gaining Google Keep integration, allowing people to create and edit shared notes or lists directly within conversations. It can be useful for coordinating grocery lists, trips, or other plans without switching between apps. The rollout starts now.

Chat themes make conversations more personal

Google Messages also gets Chat themes, letting users give individual conversations different backgrounds and colors. You can use Google’s wallpapers or your own photos, with message bubbles adapting to the chosen design. Chat themes are available now.

For daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

The post 5 new Android features rolling out in September that you need to know about appeared first on Gizmochina.

Let’s be real for a second: for a long time, buying a foldable phone meant making a compromise. You wanted that big, beautiful tablet screen in your pocket, but you had to accept a device that felt like a brick, had sub-par battery life, and featured cameras that belonged on a mid-ranger from three years ago.

In 2026, the foldable landscape has fundamentally shifted. Thanks to the absolute magic of silicon-carbon batteries, next-generation titanium hinges, and the sheer brute force of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and Tensor G6 chips, the compromises are gone. Foldables are now thinner than some standard slab phones, their batteries are pushing past 6,000mAh, and they pack 200MP camera sensors.

If you are finally ready to ditch the traditional smartphone form factor, here is the definitive guide to the best foldable phones you can buy in 2026.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8

Samsung basically invented this category, and with the Galaxy Z Fold 8, they have perfected the mainstream foldable formula. Weighing in at just 201 grams, it’s Samsung’s lightest Z Fold ever, making it feel remarkably normal when closed. They’ve finally tweaked the aspect ratios to what we’ve been begging for, giving us a highly usable 10:16 cover screen that doesn’t feel cramped, and a 4:3 inner display that reaches a blinding 3,000 nits of peak brightness.

It is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and packs a 4,800mAh battery, making it a safe and reliable choice for most people. Samsung also introduced Flex Titanium Technology, which combines a titanium-alloy film with an enhanced plate to seriously reduce the visibility of the crease over time. The device also features dual 50MP sensors and the new My FanCam auto-tracking feature, making it one of the most refined foldable smartphones available.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra

If the standard Fold 8 is the mainstream benchmark, the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra is Samsung bringing its unhinged Ultra philosophy to the folding world. This is for the power users who want absolutely everything without compromise. When unfolded, this thing is an absurdly thin 4.1mm. It features a massive 8-inch main display and bumps the battery up to a 5,000mAh cell.

But the real story here is the camera and productivity suite. Samsung crammed a 200MP primary sensor into this incredibly thin chassis, which actually processes full-resolution HDR imagery, backed by an expanded graphite cooling system so the phone doesn’t melt in your hands.

It also brings the new Gemini Notebook agentic AI features in One UI 9, which can automatically generate meeting recaps and visual summaries, making the Fold 8 Ultra a powerful productivity-focused device.

Oppo Find N6

The Oppo Find N series maintains its wider, passport-like shape, which many users prefer for typing on the cover screen. The Find N6 focuses heavily on camera quality and hinge durability. Using a new 3D-printed titanium hinge, the device manages to keep the inner screen crease very minimal.

The camera system, tuned in partnership with Hasselblad, includes a 200MP main sensor, a 50MP ultra-wide, and a 50MP 3x periscope lens. Oppo also included a large 6,000mAh silicon-carbon battery with 80W wired charging, all within an 8.93mm thick frame.

Honor Magic V6

Honor continues to focus on making foldables as thin as possible. The Magic V6 measures 8.75mm when closed, making it one of the slimmest options currently available. Despite the thin profile, it houses a 6,660mAh battery, which provides excellent longevity.

The displays are quite bright, with the cover screen reaching up to 6,000 nits for HDR content. It features a capable camera setup, including a 64MP periscope lens alongside dual 50MP sensors, and offers software features that integrate surprisingly well with other ecosystems, including basic cross-compatibility with some Apple devices.

Huawei Pura X Max

The Huawei Pura X Max is hard to get in the US, but it is an interesting device if you are looking at international options. In terms of its overall design and book-style form factor, it is actually quite similar to the Galaxy Z Fold 8.

It runs on the Kirin 9030 Pro chip and features a 7.7-inch inner screen paired with a 5.4-inch outer display. It is relatively light at 229g and measures 5.2mm thick when opened. For cameras, it uses a 50MP main sensor with a variable aperture (f/1.4 to f/4.0) to help with natural depth of field, plus a 50MP telephoto and a 12.5MP ultra-wide.

It also packs a 5,300mAh battery with 66W wired charging and supports Huawei‘s M-Pen 3 Mini stylus. The main catch is that it doesn’t come with Google Play Services, which is a dealbreaker for a lot of people, but the physical hardware and updated hinge design are solid.

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold

The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is Google’s latest book-style foldable, focusing heavily on software and everyday usability. It runs on the new Tensor G6 chip and features a redesigned gearless hinge that helps slim down the bezels and reduce the overall weight. For cameras, it uses a 48MP main sensor capable of 30x Super Res Zoom, relying on Google‘s well-known computational photography rather than massive hardware numbers.

A unique addition to the design is the HiLight, a multi-functional LED ring around the camera flash used for color-coded notifications. If you prefer a clean Android interface and practical AI features over having the most extreme hardware specs, it is a very solid choice.

Motorola Razr Fold

Expanding from their popular flip phones, Motorola’s Razr Fold is their entry into the full-sized, book-style foldable market. It uses Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 3 for added drop resistance and measures 4.55mm when open.

The device includes an 8.1-inch inner display and comes in several Pantone-validated colors. Inside, it runs on the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, uses a 6,000mAh battery, and features a triple 50MP camera setup. Motorola is also promising seven years of OS updates for this model, matching Google and Samsung.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

The post The Best Foldable Phones of 2026 appeared first on Gizmochina.

This year’s smartwatch launches were packed into a short period. Samsung and Google introduced their new watches in July and August, while Garmin also released the Fenix 9 series just recently. 

Most of the major changes this year focus on health, fitness, and battery life. Samsung improved its sleep apnea and cardio tracking features, and Google introduced a breathing emergency detector that can contact emergency services automatically. Here are five of the best smartwatches to consider in 2026.

Best for iPhone Users

The Apple Watch Series 11 keeps the familiar design, but Apple has added some useful health features. The biggest addition is hypertension notifications. The watch looks for signs of long-term high blood pressure by analyzing blood vessel responses over 30 days using its optical heart sensor. Apple trained the feature using data from more than 100,000 participants and tested it in a clinical study involving 2,000 people.

Apple also introduced a new sleep score system that looks at sleep duration, sleep stages, and bedtime consistency. You can check the score on the watch or through the Health app.

The Series 11 also supports 5G through a redesigned antenna system. Its fast charging can provide up to eight hours of use after just 15 minutes of charging. Battery life is rated at up to 24 hours with normal use and up to 38 hours in Low Power Mode.

The aluminum models use updated Ion-X glass, which Apple says is twice as scratch-resistant as the previous generation. The watch comes in 42mm and 46mm sizes. Prices start at $399 for the GPS model and $499 for GPS + Cellular.

For iPhone users, the Apple Watch Series 11 is the easiest option to recommend thanks to its close integration with Apple’s apps, notifications, and health features.

Best Rugged Option

The Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 is Samsung’s most rugged smartwatch, built for outdoor activities. It keeps the titanium case from the original Ultra but is 12% thinner. Its 1.52-inch Sapphire Crystal Super AMOLED display can reach 5,000 nits, making it easier to see in direct sunlight.

Samsung launched the Watch Ultra 2 alongside the Galaxy Watch 9. Both watches are powered by Qualcomm’s 3nm Snapdragon Wear Elite chipset. The battery has also grown to 800mAh, which is 35% larger than the battery in the previous Ultra. Samsung has added a Trail Run mode that tracks elevation and terrain during outdoor runs.

The watch uses Samsung’s BioActive sensor system for health tracking. It supports features such as FDA-cleared sleep apnea detection, Heart Health Score, and Daily Cardio Load tracking to help with workout recovery.

The Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 starts at $699 for the LTE version in the US and €749 in Europe. 

Best for Google Users

The Pixel Watch 5 keeps the round design with curved glass that has become a signature of the Pixel Watch series. This year’s model adds deeper Gemini AI integration along with several new health features.

One of the most notable additions is Breathing Emergency Detection, which will launch first in Europe. It monitors for major drops in blood oxygen and can automatically contact emergency services if the wearer becomes unresponsive.

Google also improved the battery life on both versions. The 41mm model has a 332mAh battery and is rated for up to 30 hours with the always-on display enabled. The larger 45mm model has a 465mAh battery and can last up to 40 hours. Both models can charge to 50% in around 15 minutes with the included charging dock.

The 41mm model starts at $399 for Wi-Fi and $499 for LTE. The 45mm version starts at $429 for Wi-Fi and $529 for LTE, making the Pixel Watch 5 more expensive than the previous generation.

Best for Outdoor Adventures

Garmin’s Fenix watches are designed for people who spend a lot of time outdoors, and the Fenix 9 continues that approach. It has a display that can reach 3,000 nits of brightness, satellite messaging support, and much longer battery life than most mainstream smartwatches.

Garmin rates the Fenix 9 for up to 57 days of battery life, depending on the mode you use. The company launched it alongside the Fenix 9 Pro, with the Pro model adding built-in inReach connectivity for two-way satellite messaging without a phone.

The watch has 64GB of storage, enough for around 7,000 offline songs. It also includes TopoActive maps for multiple continents and fitness features such as Training Readiness, Endurance Score, and an ECG app for AFib detection.

Garmin has also added Garmin Epic, which puts several days of activities, photos, and health data into a single timeline. The Fenix 9 starts at $999.99, while the Fenix 9 Pro starts at $1,099.99.

Best Value

The Amazfit Balance 3 is made for people who want a capable smartwatch without spending flagship-level money. It has a 1.5-inch AMOLED display with sapphire crystal glass and can reach up to 3,000 nits of peak brightness.

Amazfit launched the Balance 3 with a 51.4mm case. It is 14.6mm thick and weighs 62 grams in the stainless steel version. A lighter 55-gram titanium version is also planned.

The watch has a 10ATM water resistance rating, and its HybridCharge Energy Intelligence system tracks training load, daily stress, and sleep. It can then use this information to suggest when you should focus on rest and recovery.

Amazfit has not announced global pricing for the Balance 3 yet. The previous Balance 2 launched at $299 in the US and Rs 24,999 in India, which gives us an idea of where the new model could be priced.

Which Smartwatch Should You Buy?

The Apple Watch Series 11 is the best choice for iPhone users who want seamless access to Apple’s apps, notifications, and health features. The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 is a better fit for Android users who want a rugged design, strong health tracking, and a larger battery.

The Google Pixel Watch 5 makes the most sense for Pixel users and anyone who wants Gemini AI features built into their smartwatch. The Garmin Fenix 9 is the better choice for outdoor activities, navigation, and long battery life.

Finally, the Amazfit Balance 3 is a good option for anyone who wants a capable smartwatch without spending as much as they would on a flagship model.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

The post Best Smartwatches of 2026 appeared first on Gizmochina.

Fitness bands have moved well beyond simple step counting. Today’s fitness bands focus on continuous health monitoring, recovery insights, sleep quality, and long battery life, while keeping the design light enough for all-day wear. Here’s a look at some of the standout models currently available.

Google Fitbit Air

Google’s Fitbit Air is one of the lightest trackers available. The body weighs just 5.2 g without the band and is designed for continuous, low-profile wear. It offers up to 7 days of battery life and tracks heart rate, SpO2, skin temperature variation, sleep stages, steps, and activity.

Core metrics work without a subscription through the free Google Health app. A paid Google Health Premium plan unlocks the Gemini-powered Health Coach, adaptive fitness plans, deeper sleep insights, and more personalized guidance. Every Fitbit Air includes three months of Premium free; after that it costs around $9.99 per month or $99.99 per year (it is also included with Google AI Pro and Ultra plans).

The design is minimalist with no display, making it a strong choice for users who prefer a simple band that stays out of the way.

Price: The hardware costs $99.99 or around €95.99 to €99.99.

Hume Band 2.0

The Hume Band 2.0 is another screen-free option focused on longer-term health trends. It claims up to 14 days of battery life and tracks heart rate, HRV, SpO2, skin temperature, sleep stages, activity, and strain/recovery. A notable addition in the 2.0 version is blood pressure trend tracking. The band also generates metrics such as Biological Age and Pace of Aging.

All of these core health metrics and scores are available in the free Hume Health app with no subscription required. An optional Hume Premium plan (around $8.99 per month) adds AI-powered coaching, personalized recommendations, and deeper reports, but the device works fully without it. It’s aimed at users interested in longevity and early health signals rather than traditional sports tracking or notifications.

Price: Available from the official Hume Health store with worldwide shipping for around $249 (one-time purchase; check the official Hume site for current offers).

Xiaomi Smart Band 11 Active

Xiaomi’s affordable Smart Band 11 Active keeps things practical. It features a 1.47” color display and delivers up to 21 days of battery life in light use (around 8 days with more frequent tracking). Health features include all-day heart rate and SpO2 monitoring, stress tracking, and sleep tracking. It supports 50 workout modes and carries a 5ATM water-resistance rating. The metallic finish gives it a slightly more premium look than earlier budget bands while remaining lightweight.

Price: The Xiaomi Smart Band 11 Active is gradually rolling out to early markets in Europe and Asia. It costs PLN 139 (Poland), Php 1,999 (Philippines), and 990,000 VND (Vietnam). Outside these regions, expect a price around €30–€40.

Xiaomi Smart Band 10 and 10 Pro

The standard Smart Band 10 sits in Xiaomi’s mainstream range, while the 10 Pro steps up the experience. The Pro version uses a larger 1.74” AMOLED display that reaches up to 2000 nits peak brightness, making it easy to read outdoors. Battery life reaches up to 21 days in light use. Health tracking covers continuous heart rate, SpO2, stress, sleep (including HRV during sleep on the Pro), and a wide selection of sports modes. The Pro also adds independent GNSS for better outdoor tracking and a more refined build with aluminium or ceramic options.

Price: The standard and pro variants cost about €45 and €65 respectively. Both models are available across global markets including Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia.

Huawei Watch Fit 5 Pro

The Watch Fit 5 Pro leans closer to a lightweight smartwatch while still functioning as a strong fitness band. It features a bright 1.92” AMOLED display and offers up to 10 days of battery life with lighter use (around 7 days with more typical tracking). Huawei’s TruSense system handles continuous heart rate, SpO2, sleep analysis (TruSleep), stress/emotion insights, and more. It also includes an ECG sensor. The design uses a rotating crown and a relatively slim profile, with solid water resistance for swimming and everyday wear.

Price: This one costs approximately €300, £249.99 in the UK, around 549 AUD in Australia. Check Huawei’s official store or authorised retailers for current regional pricing.

WHOOP 5.0 and WHOOP MG

WHOOP takes a different approach from most fitness bands. It relies on a mandatory subscription model. The WHOOP 5.0 delivers up to 14 days of battery life. It continuously tracks heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), respiratory rate, skin temperature, sleep, and recovery. Its Healthspan features estimate physiological age and pace of aging based on long-term data. It’s designed for people who want deep recovery and training insights rather than on-wrist notifications or a bright display.

WHOOP MG delivers over 14 days of battery life, adds medical-grade features including on-demand ECG readings, daily blood pressure insights, and AFib detection.

Price: WHOOP offers three different subscription tiers:

• WHOOP One: Includes WHOOP 5.0 device and features core fitness and sleep tracking for $199 per year.
• WHOOP Peak: Includes WHOOP 5.0, a wireless PowerPack, and offers advanced health and stress monitors for $239 per year.
• WHOOP Life: Includes specialized WHOOP MG hardware to provide medical-grade ECG and blood pressure tracking for $359 per year.

The hardware stops tracking once you cancel your membership.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

The post Best Fitness Bands in 2026 appeared first on Gizmochina.

A little-known Google system app has started showing up in Play Store update lists on a lot of Android phones, leaving some users puzzled by its blank icon.

Android Pulse is an official Google app that’s been quietly pushed to millions of devices. Its Play Store description, which became more visible over the weekend, says it facilitates rule distribution for anomaly detection in critical system resource consumption by the Android operating system and installed applications.

In plain terms, it keeps an eye on whether apps or system processes are using unusually high amounts of resources like RAM, battery, or CPU. By sending out detection rules, it helps spot abnormal behavior that could hurt performance or efficiency. The name “Pulse” basically refers to this ongoing check on the phone’s vital signs.

The app isn’t brand new. Builds have been around since at least March, and the Play Store already lists more than 10 million downloads. It just stayed mostly under the radar until recent updates started making it appear in the available updates section for some people. The listing itself has a blank icon and empty screenshots, which is part of why it caused confusion at first.

Because Android Pulse works as a background system service rather than a regular consumer app, you can’t uninstall it once it’s there. You can disable it the same way you can many other built-in Android components if you really want to, though there’s no obvious reason to do so. It has no user interface and doesn’t need any interaction from you.

Google hasn’t given a detailed public explanation beyond the short Play Store blurb. Reports from reliable outlets covering the sudden appearance confirm it’s a legitimate first-party component meant to help with system health and debugging. If you see Android Pulse in your update queue, it’s safe to install. It’s designed to help keep your phone running smoothly rather than anything to worry about.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source)

The post Google’s Android Pulse app shows up on Play Store with blank icon and screenshots appeared first on Gizmochina.

When you are trying to find which is truly the best flagship phone of the year, you ask specific questions, like which one has the best camera? Which one lasts the longest? And, perhaps most importantly, which phone actually gives you a reason to upgrade?

The questions are the same in 2026 but there’s a new problem sitting around this year. Memory prices have gone up sharply, and so have the prices of smartphones. Xiaomi flat-out said that higher component has pushed the 17 Ultra price, while Samsung has reportedly been dealing with higher RAM costs from its own chip business.

You might have expected phone makers play it safe with the prices. But with the September flagships now out, including the iPhone 18 Pro Max at $1,299 and the Pixel 11 Pro XL at $1,299, clearly prices have gone up. Even so, the top-end hardware here is still priced relatively well, while offering the best of what they can.

So, if you’re already thinking about spending flagship money today, here are the best flagship phones that you can buy right now.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Samsung is known for playing it safe with its flagship phones, and the Galaxy S26 Ultra is no exception. It is built around the same formula we’ve seen in the previous Galaxy Ultras, but that’s not to say nothing is new here. 

It starts at $1,299.99 (Amazon US currently lists the 256GB model at $1,142) and gives you a huge 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a 120Hz refresh rate. There’s Gorilla Armor 2 on top, but the more interesting addition this year is Samsung’s Privacy Display.

These prices are as of 25 Oct 2026, 22:12 IST and are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.

The idea around privacy on a phone’s screen isn’t new. We’ve had privacy-focused tempered glass for years, but Samsung decided to ship it on the phone itself. And that too with exclusive customizations.

Samsung’s privacy screen changes the way the pixels work so the screen becomes much harder to see from the side while staying clear when you’re looking straight at it.

It’s one of those features that sounds like a gimmick until you actually use it. What’s more impressive is that you can even hide a part of the screen, like the notification island or messages.

The S26 Ultra also gets a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chip made specifically for Galaxy phones. Samsung finally increased wired charging to 60W as well, which is a welcome change after years of sticking with 45W.

The battery, however, is still 5,000mAh. That’s the one area where Samsung hasn’t really kept up with some of its Chinese rivals, which are now putting 6,000mAh and even larger batteries into their flagships.

Still, the S26 Ultra is difficult to fault as an overall package. You get the 200MP main camera, multiple zoom options, the S Pen, Samsung DeX, a polished version of Android, and years of software support.

It may not be the most exciting phone in every category, but that’s exactly why it’s such an easy recommendation. It does almost everything well..

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

Oppo has been working with Hasselblad for a while now but the Find X9 Ultra feels like the point where the partnership really starts to show. It has a $1,499 starting price, while Amazon US lists the 512GB model at $1,949 and Amazon India at ₹169,999.

This is also the first time Oppo has brought its Ultra flagship to global markets, and for that money it has gone all-in on the cameras. There’s a 200MP main camera, a 200MP periscope telephoto, another 50MP periscope camera, and a 50MP ultrawide.

That’s a lot of megapixels, but the numbers aren’t really the interesting part. Oppo has worked the cameras into its Hasselblad Master Camera System, aiming for a more consistent look across the different lenses.

At this price, the rest of the phone doesn’t feel like an afterthought either. There’s a 6.82-inch LTPO AMOLED display running at 120Hz, while a massive 7,050mAh battery handles the power requirements. And when you finally do need to charge it, 100W wired charging gets the job done quickly.

The biggest question before spending this much is whether you like ColorOS. It’s perfectly capable, but it can feel a little busier than the software on a Pixel or even a Samsung phone.

Then there’s the $1,499 starting price, while Amazon US lists the 512GB model at $1,949 and Amazon India at ₹169,999. That’s a lot of money, but we also can’t factor out what it is offering in terms of hardware.

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is another pick for camera nerds. Its main camera uses a 1-inch OmniVision sensor with LOFIC technology. It is designed to handle a wider range of brightness in difficult scenes. The 200MP periscope telephoto camera, developed with Leica as part of the companies’ deeper partnership, is another highlight here.

And this isn’t just a case of putting a Leica logo on the back. Leica has been involved in the camera’s development much earlier this time, including the design stage.

You can see where Xiaomi is going with this. The phone should be particularly good when you’re shooting after dark, zooming in on something far away, or dealing with scenes where the lighting is all over the place.

The hardware outside the cameras is flagship-grade too. There’s a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, a 6.9-inch LTPO AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, and a 6,800mAh battery. Charging is rated at 90W wired and 80W wireless. It’s available in the UK for £1,299, and Amazon India lists the 16GB+512GB at ₹139,999.

So, should you buy it? If taking photos is one of the main reasons you’re upgrading, absolutely. If you’re more interested in software, gaming, or the overall ecosystem, there are better choices here.

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL

The Pixel 11 Pro XL is Google’s newest flagship in the market. And unlike other options in this list, it’s not big on camera megapixels or processing power. Pixel phones have mostly been known for software polish and tricks, and the 11 Pro XL is just that. 

The phone starts at $1299 for 256GB and comes with a 6.8-inch QHD+ AMOLED display that can reach 3,600 nits of peak brightness.

Inside is Google’s Tensor G6 chip along with a Titan M3 security chip. The camera setup includes a 50MP main camera, 48MP ultrawide, and 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom.

As usual with a Pixel, the camera experience isn’t just about the hardware. Google’s image processing does a lot of the work, which is why Pixel phones can often produce great photos without asking you to think too much about the settings.

A novel camera feature this year is Magic Capture. It lets you record videos as you usually do, but once you’re finished, the phone presents you with candid images from those past moments. Google is using AI to refine photos, but it’s still a neat trick for everyone who struggles with poses in normal shoots. 

There is one slightly strange change this year. The Pro XL now starts with 12GB of RAM, down from 16GB on last year’s model. That’s not something most people are going to notice in everyday use, but it does show just how much rising memory costs are affecting flagship phones.

What hasn’t changed is Google’s seven-year software support. The Pixel 11 Pro XL is probably the easiest phone on this list to recommend to someone who just wants Android to stay out of the way and work.

iPhone 17 Pro Max

If you’re already deep into Apple’s ecosystem, you probably don’t need much convincing about the iPhone 17 Pro Max. Apple has since replaced it with the iPhone 18 Pro Max, but it’s still a phone worth buying when money isn’t the main concern.

The 17 Pro Max comes with a redesigned aluminum unibody, a vapor chamber for better cooling, and Apple’s A19 Pro chip. The iPhone 18 Pro Max, which replaced it, starts at $1,299 for 256GB and moves to the A20 Pro chip.

The 6.9-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display runs at up to 120Hz with ProMotion and can reach 3,000 nits outdoors. Apple has also added Ceramic Shield 2 and its new N1 wireless chip, along with Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6. Apple has since replaced it with the iPhone 18 Pro Max, which starts at $1,299 for 256GB and brings the A20 Pro chip and up to 45 hours of video playback.

The camera setup has three 48MP cameras covering the main, ultrawide, and telephoto ranges, with up to 8x zoom. Apple also claims up to 39 hours of video playback, which should make this one of the better options here for heavy users. The 18 Pro Max is rated for up to 45 hours.

Charging has finally become a little less painful too. With Apple’s new 40W adapter, the 17 Pro Max can reach 50% in around 20 minutes.

Of course, the biggest reason to buy the iPhone 17 Pro Max, which Amazon US now sells only as Renewed, isn’t any single specification. It’s the ecosystem. If you have a Mac, Apple Watch, AirPods, or other Apple devices, everything simply works together, and that holds true for its successor as well.

Amazon US now sells the 17 Pro Max only as Renewed, and its successor starts at $1,299. That’s still a lot, but if you’re already invested in Apple, the Pro Max is the obvious choice.

Which One Should You Actually Buy?

Here’s the simple version. The Galaxy S26 Ultra is the one we would recommend if you don’t have a specific weakness or preference. It’s the complete package, and features like the S Pen and DeX give it things the competition doesn’t really match.

The Oppo Find X9 Ultra is where I’d look first if the camera is the whole reason you’re upgrading. It isn’t cheap, but Oppo has clearly put a lot of work into making this a serious camera phone.

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra makes more sense if you’re particularly interested in zoom and night photography. Its camera hardware is hard to ignore, although availability could be an issue depending on where you live.

The Pixel 11 Pro XL is the easy choice for people who value clean software and long-term support. It’s also probably the least intimidating phone here if you just want something that works without a much tinkering.

And then there’s the iPhone 17 Pro Max. If you’re already using Apple products, there’s little reason to look elsewhere unless you specifically want Android.

Flagship phones have gotten expensive, and there’s no getting around that. In previous years, at least the price hikes came with real hardware improvements. With the September flagships now out, including the iPhone 18 Pro Max at $1,299 and the Pixel 11 Pro XL at $1,299, prices have indeed gone up, and AI is to blame. So if you’re thinking of getting a new flagship phone, know your requirements and get the one that’s best for you.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Read more

• Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Pixel 10 Pro XL: Which Flagship Is Actually Worth Your Money?
• iPhone 18 Pro vs Galaxy S26 Ultra: Specs, Camera, Battery and Price Compared
• Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17: Specs, Camera, Battery & Performance Compared

The post 6 Best Flagship Phones of 2026 appeared first on Gizmochina.

This is a script we write every year — listing the best mid-range smartphones you can buy. And there’s a reason we come back to it every year. Mid-range has always been the segment where brands trickle down flagship features, performance, and design choices into something that covers what most people actually need day to day, without a hefty price tag. 

This year, though, the story’s a little different. Our usual pattern is to find out the phones that are aggressively priced and offer the best bang for the buck. But 2026 threw a wrench into that formula. 

The global memory chip shortage, driven largely by AI data centers hoovering up DRAM and NAND supply, has pushed component costs up across the board, and mid-range devices have taken a real hit. Samsung reportedly pushed for as much as a 100% price hike on LPDDR5X memory, and brands everywhere from India to Europe have quietly raised prices on phones that used to sit comfortably under $500. 

So this year, mid-range stretches a bit further up the price ladder than it used to, and some of the phones below cost more than you might expect for the category. What hasn’t changed, fortunately, is the value proposition. You can still expect bright OLED screens, big batteries, and reliable cameras. 

Here are the five best mid-range phones you can get in 2026.  

Google Pixel 10a

You know the Pixel formula by now, and Google didn’t mess with it much this year. The Pixel 10a starts at $499 and offers a 6.3-inch OLED display running at 120Hz with a Tensor G4 chip, 8GB of RAM, and a 5,100mAh battery. 

The camera setup keeps the same 48MP main sensor and 13MP ultrawide from last year’s model, and you also get a loyal seven years of OS and security update promise. The brand also launched the Pixel 10a with recycled cobalt, copper, gold, and tungsten making up more than a third of the phone’s weight.

Nothing here will wow you in a spec sheet comparison, and the design is basically a repeat of the 9a. But if you want a phone you can buy once and stop thinking about for years, this is it.

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro

Nothing has never been shy about wanting its phones to look different, and the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is no exception. It swaps the brand’s usual plastic build for an aluminum unibody frame, adds a 6.83-inch AMOLED display that hits 144Hz, and carries over the circular Glyph Matrix from the pricier Phone (3), scaled down to 137 individually addressable LEDs on the back. 

Under the hood, it is powered by a Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chip with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. Nothing is asking $499 for all this. 

The camera experience isn’t as consistently impressive as what you get from Google’s Pixel lineup, and battery life isn’t its strongest point either. Still, if you care about having a phone that feels a little less generic, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is an easy one to recommend.

Samsung Galaxy A57 5G

Samsung’s Galaxy A series has quietly become one of the strongest choices in the mid-range segment, and the Galaxy A57 continues that trend.

The A57 stands out because it feels more expensive than it actually is. Samsung has given it a slim design and a premium-looking glass-and-metal build, while also improving the hardware over the previous-generation A56.

It has a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED Plus display at 120Hz, a 5,000mAh battery with 45W charging, IP68 water and dust resistance, and a 50MP main camera backed by a 12MP ultrawide and 5MP macro lens. 

It is a particularly good choice if you already use Samsung devices. One UI makes you right at home, Samsung’s ecosystem is easy to work with, and the company is offering six years of OS upgrades and security patches. A recent teardown even scored the Galaxy A57 highly for repairability.

The downside is that it isn’t the most exciting phone for gaming. If raw performance is your priority, there are better options in this list.

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion

Motorola’s Edge Fusion lineup has always been about finding the sweet spot between price and features, and the Edge 70 Fusion is just that. It gives you enough hardware that you won’t feel like you’re settling.

The phone packs a 6.7-inch pOLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate, 5200 nits peak brightness, a Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 chip, and a large 5,200mAh battery with 68W fast charging. The camera setup is led by a 50MP main sensor with optical image stabilization, joined by a 13MP ultrawide camera.

Motorola also keeps the Edge 70 Fusion relatively slim and light, and it also has an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance. Its main weakness is software support. 

Motorola has improved in this area, but it still doesn’t match Google’s seven-year commitment or Samsung’s six years of updates. Still, it’s an option you can consider if you want a good screen and battery life for entertainment. 

OnePlus Nord 6

If the Pixel 10a is the sensible choice and the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is the one you buy with your heart, the OnePlus Nord 6 is the phone for people who just want things to be fast.

It is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset, paired with up to 12GB of RAM, giving it considerably more performance headroom than most phones in this price range. 

The phone also has a 6.78-inch AMOLED display with a 165Hz refresh rate, while its 9000mAh battery gives it plenty of endurance. OnePlus supports that battery with 80W fast charging, so even when you do run it down, you don’t have to leave it plugged in for long.

The camera system isn’t the main reason to buy the Nord 6, and its design isn’t as distinctive as Nothing’s either. But that’s fine. OnePlus wants you to spend the money on performance and battery with the Nord 6.

The biggest catch with buying a OnePlus phone in 2026 comes down to availability. Since OnePlus has pulled out of almost every international market except India, the Nord 6 is really only a practical choice if you live there.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

The post 5 Best Mid-Range Phones of 2026 appeared first on Gizmochina.

Smartwatches have improved significantly over the years. They now do far more than count steps and display phone notifications. Modern models can track heart rate throughout the day, record detailed workout data, measure sleep quality, monitor stress, and provide GPS navigation for outdoor activities. Many also include advanced tools such as ECG readings, blood-oxygen monitoring, recovery scores, personalized training plans, and emergency safety features.

The best option depends on the type of exercise you do, the health data you want to monitor, and how often you are willing to charge the device. Some watches focus on detailed training and recovery insights, while others prioritize smartwatch features, comfort, durability, or multi-day battery life.

If you are looking for a good smartwatch to track your fitness, workouts, heart rate, and overall health, these are the best smartwatches you can buy in 2026.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 9

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 9 is the easy recommendation for Android users who want a conventional smartwatch without treating workouts as an afterthought. Available in 40mm and 44mm sizes, it is slim, lightweight, and far less imposing than the company’s rugged Ultra-tier watch.

Its strengths are familiar: continuous heart-rate tracking, sleep monitoring, workout recording, GPS, stress data, blood-oxygen readings, and Samsung’s BioActive sensor platform. But Samsung is leaning harder into interpretation, not just measurement. Features such as Heart Health Score, Daily Cardio Load, Fitness Index, Vitals monitoring, and sleep-based health baselines attempt to turn a sprawling dashboard of numbers into something actionable.

The Watch 9 also offers a bright Super AMOLED display that can reach 3,000 nits, dual-frequency GPS, LTE options, NFC, and up to 32GB of storage. It runs Wear OS 7 with One UI 9 Watch, so it remains useful as an actual smartwatch rather than a fitness tracker with notification spam attached.

Its biggest weakness is battery life. The 44mm model has a 445mAh battery, while the 40mm uses a 390mAh cell, fine for a day or perhaps more, but not Garmin territory. Still, for general workouts, heart-rate tracking, sleep insights, and daily Android life, it is one of the most complete options.

For a wider view of what else is worth buying this year, see our roundup of the best smartwatches of 2026.

Apple Watch Series 11

The Apple Watch Series 11 remains the default choice for iPhone users, and for good reason. It is not the longest-lasting watch here, nor the most rugged, but Apple’s health and safety software remains unusually polished.

This generation adds hypertension notifications, which use long-term optical heart-rate sensor data to look for consistent signs associated with chronic high blood pressure. It also introduces a Sleep Score, combining sleep duration, schedule consistency, awakenings, and sleep stages into one digestible rating. Neither feature replaces medical testing or a clinician, but both could be useful prompts to pay closer attention.

The rest of the package is classic Apple Watch: ECG, irregular-rhythm notifications, blood oxygen tools where available, cycle tracking, noise monitoring, crash detection, fall detection, depth and water-temperature sensors, and a deep catalog of workout modes.

The Series 11 is available in 42mm and 46mm cases, with aluminum and titanium finishes. The aluminum model gets tougher Ion-X glass with a ceramic coating, while the titanium version uses sapphire crystal. Apple rates the battery for up to 24 hours of normal use and up to 38 hours in Low Power Mode. Fast charging can reach up to 80% in around 30 minutes.

Google Pixel Watch 5

The Google Pixel Watch 5 is for Android users who want their smartwatch to be more proactive. It combines fitness tracking with Google’s expanding Gemini AI features, contextual information, and Fitbit-inspired health tools.

The watch comes in 41mm and 45mm sizes and uses a bright 3,000-nit domed AMOLED display. Its dual-frequency GPS is designed to improve route accuracy in dense cities, wooded trails, and other areas where satellite signals can struggle. For runners, cyclists, and hikers, that can matter more than another dozen sports modes.

Fitness features include recovery recommendations based on sleep and heart-rate variability, improved sleep-stage detection, Smart Wake alarms, strength-training guidance, and customized workout plans. Google is also expanding the watch’s role in safety with Breathing Emergency Detection, which uses heart-rate, movement, and barometric data to identify severe oxygen-related emergencies and potentially contact emergency services if the wearer is unresponsive.

Battery life is better than on previous Pixel Watches. The 41mm model is rated for up to 30 hours with the always-on display enabled, while the larger 45mm version can last up to 40 hours

Garmin Venu 4

The Garmin Venu 4 is one of the best choices for people who see fitness tracking as the main event rather than a smartwatch side feature. It is available in 41mm and 45mm sizes and delivers up to 12 days of battery life in smartwatch mode, making it dramatically easier to wear continuously for sleep, recovery, and workout tracking.

Garmin’s health suite is particularly strong. The Venu 4 tracks heart rate, heart-rate variability, Pulse Ox, skin temperature, sleep stages, Body Battery, stress, women’s health metrics, and ECG. The important difference is that Garmin is good at connecting those measurements to training readiness. If sleep quality is poor or recovery is low, Garmin Fitness Coach can adapt workout recommendations rather than simply pushing you to close another activity ring.

The Venu 4 also includes GPS, onboard music, Garmin Pay, Bluetooth calling, smart notifications, a built-in flashlight, and safety-tracking functions. Its software is not as app-heavy as Apple’s or Google’s platforms, but athletes may not care. This is a watch designed for someone who wants reliable heart-rate trends, recovery data, workout plans, and battery life that does not turn every evening into a charging session.

Amazfit Balance 3

The Amazfit Balance 3 targets users who want advanced training metrics without paying flagship smartwatch prices. It features a 1.5-inch AMOLED display, sapphire glass, dual-band GPS, offline maps, Bluetooth calling, 64GB of storage, and up to 21 days of battery life on the titanium version.

Amazfit uses its Hybrid Training System to combine fitness, recovery, and lifestyle data. The system includes BioCharge, LifeLoad, and Training Load metrics. BioCharge estimates current energy and recovery levels. LifeLoad measures daily lifestyle stress. Training Load tracks workout strain.

The Zepp app uses that data to show whether a user should train hard, recover, or adjust their schedule. Weekly Focus and Training Balance tools also help users understand how their workouts are distributed across endurance, strength, and recovery.

The Balance 3 supports more than 180 sports modes. It can recognize 25 strength exercises and eight standard activity movements. It also supports external heart-rate straps, cycling sensors, and running power meters.

Amazfit has added HYROX-specific features, including workout tracking, race simulations, training plans, virtual pacing, and post-race performance analysis. The Balance 3 is a strong choice for runners, gym users, and hybrid athletes who want deeper fitness data and long battery life.

Xiaomi Watch 5

The Xiaomi Watch 5 offers a large battery, Wear OS 6, and a complete set of health and fitness tools. It uses a dual-chip design with a Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 processor and a BES2800 low-power chip. Xiaomi says the watch can last up to six days in regular smart mode and up to 18 days in power-saving mode.

The watch has a 930mAh silicon-carbon battery, a 1.54-inch AMOLED display, sapphire protection, dual-band GPS, NFC, ECG support, and continuous heart-rate and SpO2 monitoring. It also supports more than 150 sports modes and includes offline maps for outdoor training.

Google Gemini is available on the Xiaomi Watch 5, along with Google Wallet, Google Maps, Google Calendar, and the Google Play Store. The watch also supports Xiaomi HyperConnect for smart-home controls and connected-device features.

Xiaomi has also added gesture controls that use EMG, IMU, and PPG sensors. Users can pinch, rub, snap, shake, or rotate their wrist to control functions such as calls, alarms, workouts, camera controls, and media playback.

The Xiaomi Watch 5 is a good option for Android users who want Wear OS features without charging their smartwatch every day.

Amazfit Active 2

The Amazfit Active 2 delivers many key fitness features at a lower price than flagship smartwatches. It has a 1.32-inch AMOLED display, stainless-steel frame, GPS, Bluetooth calling, heart-rate monitoring, SpO2 tracking, stress tracking, temperature sensing, and more than 160 workout modes.

The watch uses the BioTracker 6.0 PPG sensor and includes Zepp Coach training guidance. It can recognize strength-training movements, track running performance, provide virtual pacing, and estimate race achievements.

The Active 2 also offers readiness scores, sleep data, smartphone notifications, music controls, camera controls, and up to 10 days of typical battery life. The premium model includes sapphire glass for added display protection.

The Amazfit Active 2 is a sensible pick for users who want workout tracking, GPS, and heart-rate data without paying for premium smartwatch features they may not use.

Honor Watch 6

The Honor Watch 6 (full review) is built around an idea that many smartwatch owners will find refreshing: not charging every day. Its 980mAh silicon-carbon battery is rated for up to 35 days of use, making it one of the most endurance-focused watches in this group.

It includes over 120 workout modes, dual-band GPS, continuous heart-rate monitoring, SpO2 tracking, stress measurements, sleep analysis, and body-energy estimates. Trail runners get climbing and route-deviation metrics through Honor’s AccuTrack GPS system, while sports such as badminton and football receive more specific performance data.

The 1.46-inch AMOLED display reaches up to 3,000 nits, which should make it easy to read stats during outdoor training. It also has IP69 water and dust resistance, 5ATM water resistance, Bluetooth calling, NFC support in select markets, and gesture controls for managing alarms, calls, and music.

The Honor Watch 6 is less focused on third-party apps than Apple, Google, or Samsung models. But if you prioritize a bright screen, fitness fundamentals, outdoor tracking, and exceptionally long battery life, it is a compelling alternative.

Huawei Watch Fit 5 Pro

The Huawei Watch Fit 5 Pro (full review) focuses on outdoor training and health tracking in a slim, lightweight design. It has a large AMOLED display, built-in GPS, continuous heart-rate monitoring, sleep tracking, blood-oxygen measurements, wrist-temperature tracking, Bluetooth calling, and support for more than 100 workout modes.

Huawei adds several features for more serious activities. The Watch Fit 5 Pro supports trail-running navigation, golf-course maps, ECG alerts, and diving tracking to depths of 40 meters. These tools give it a broader fitness focus than a standard activity tracker, especially for users who run outdoors, play golf, or spend time in the water.

The watch also offers up to 10 days of battery life, which makes it easier to wear overnight for sleep tracking and for multi-day trips without packing a charger. The Huawei Watch Fit 5 Pro is a strong choice for users who want a lighter alternative to a traditional round smartwatch but still need GPS, health tracking, and outdoor sports features.

Oppo Watch X3

The Oppo Watch X3 combines Wear OS 6 with a dual-engine system that moves background tasks to a low-power RTOS platform. Oppo says the approach delivers up to five days of battery life in Smart Mode and up to 16 days in Power Saver Mode.

The smartwatch includes ECG support, continuous heart-rate monitoring, SpO2 tracking, HRV-based stress insights, sleep analysis, dual-band GPS, fall detection, Bluetooth calling, and more than 100 sports modes. It also supports Google apps and services through Wear OS, which gives users access to Google Wallet, Maps, notifications, and third-party apps.

Oppo uses a titanium case and sapphire display protection for a more premium design. The Watch X3 also carries IP69 protection and MIL-STD-810H durability certification. It is a strong option for Android users who want a full Wear OS smartwatch with detailed health tracking and better battery life than most mainstream rivals.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

The post Best Fitness Smartwatches for Tracking Workouts and Heart Rate in 2026 appeared first on Gizmochina.