Samsung could be preparing a pretty big storage upgrade for its future flagships. The Galaxy S27 Ultra is now being tipped as the first smartphone to ship with UFS 5.0 storage, which, if true, would be a noticeable step forward in raw speed.

The info comes from tipster yeux1122. According to the leak, Samsung is planning to bring UFS 5.0 to at least some models in the Galaxy S27 lineup.

In terms of numbers, UFS 5.0 is said to offer interface speeds of up to 10.8 GB/s. That’s a big jump from what we have right now, and starts getting closer to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe SSD territory, at least on paper. For phones, this could translate to noticeably faster app launches, quicker file transfers, and smoother handling of heavier workloads, especially anything AI-related.

For comparison, the current Galaxy S26 series sticks with UFS 4.1. While the peak speeds are similar to UFS 4.0, Samsung has been improving things in other ways, like adding WriteBooster and tweaking how storage is managed. The company claims those changes already bring noticeable gains in things like file copying and app installs.

With UFS 5.0 though, the jump looks more straightforward. It essentially doubles the theoretical bandwidth, which could matter more as phones start doing more on-device AI processing. Tasks like running generative AI models or handling large media files are only getting heavier, so faster storage can actually make a difference there.

Interestingly, Samsung wasn’t originally expected to move to UFS 5.0 this soon. Earlier timelines pointed to around 2027 or later, with more focus on refining UFS 4.x in the meantime. But with the current push around AI-focused smartphones, it seems plans may have shifted a bit.

The timing does line up in one way. JEDEC finalized the UFS 5.0 standard earlier this year, and memory manufacturers are already working on bringing it to market. So the hardware side of things is starting to fall into place.

If Samsung does manage to pull this off, the S27 Ultra could end up being one of the first devices to really push storage performance forward again. And with how quickly on-device AI processing is evolving, that kind of upgrade might end up being more important than it sounds right now.

(Source: yeux1122)

The post Galaxy S27 Ultra tipped to be the first to use UFS 5.0 storage appeared first on Gizmochina.

A Galaxy S26 Ultra owner has run into a camera issue just days after buying the phone, and what followed sounds more confusing than it should be.

The problem showed up in a post on Samsung’s community forum. According to the user, the camera system doesn’t seem to work properly. Opening the camera app triggers a warning about some features not working, and when trying to switch lenses, it simply says the “lens cannot be used”. For a phone at this price, that’s obviously not a great start.

Naturally, the user took it to a service center. Twice. Both times, the response was the same. Diagnostics didn’t show any hardware fault, and the phone was said to be working as intended.

That might have been the end of it, but the user also shared logs through the Samsung Members app. And this is where things start to feel a bit off.

A moderator on the platform, said to be from the camera team, reviewed those logs and suggested something completely different. According to that response, the ultrawide module could actually be faulty and might need replacing. The advice was to head back to a service center. So now there are two answers. One says everything is fine, the other points to a hardware problem.

It’s not clear what’s causing the mismatch. Maybe the issue doesn’t show up during regular diagnostics. Maybe the logs are picking up something more specific. Hard to say from the outside.

Either way, it puts the user in a difficult spot. Going back to the same service center with a different diagnosis doesn’t always lead anywhere, especially if the earlier checks didn’t find anything.

There’s no official comment from Samsung on this particular case yet. It could just be one isolated incident, but it does raise questions about how consistent the support process is across different channels.

For now, it’s one of those cases where the issue itself is frustrating, but the lack of a clear answer makes it more so.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source)

The post Galaxy S26 Ultra user in limbo as log points to camera hardware issue but service center denies fix appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung doesn’t seem done experimenting with tri-fold phones just yet. A new patent suggests the company could be working on a different take, something that looks a bit more usable day to day.

The concept, referred to as the Galaxy Z TriFold Wide, leans toward a wider form factor. Closed, it would behave more like a regular phone, just slightly wider than usual. Unfold it, and it turns into a larger, tablet-like screen that’s better suited for video and multitasking compared to the first-generation TriFold. That alone makes it feel like a response to one of the bigger complaints around early multi-fold devices, the awkward aspect ratio.

Samsung’s first tri-fold launched at a very high price, somewhere around $2,899, and didn’t stick around for long due to production challenges. Even so, demand didn’t exactly disappear. Limited restocks reportedly sold out quickly, and resale prices went much higher, which says something about the level of interest. So while the first version may not have been practical to produce at scale, it clearly got people’s attention.

The wider approach also lines up with other rumors around Samsung’s foldables. There’s been talk of a Galaxy Z Fold 8 moving in a similar direction, with a more balanced display. If that happens, a wider tri-fold doesn’t feel like a stretch.

Of course, this is still just a patent, and those don’t always turn into real products. But it does give a sense of where Samsung’s thinking is right now.

At the same time, competition in this space is starting to pick up. Huawei has been experimenting with wider-style foldable form factors for a while, and Apple is expected to enter the category by the end of this year.

For Samsung, the challenge is probably less about building something new and more about making it usable and scalable. The idea of a tri-fold phone is already there. The next step is making it feel less experimental and more like something people would actually carry every day. That’s where something like a “Wide” version could make a difference, if it ever makes it past the concept stage.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source)

The post Samsung working on Galaxy Z TriFold Wide: a more practical tri-fold phone appeared first on Gizmochina.

Global smartphone shipments are off to a slower start in 2026. According to IDC’s latest Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker, shipments fell 4.1% year over year in the first quarter to 289.7 million units.

The drop effectively ends a ten-quarter streak of growth that began around mid-2023. And we are all probably aware of the reasons. Supply constraints tied to storage components and rising costs. Both of these are expected to continue putting pressure on the market.

The top two companies still posted growth. Samsung and Apple were the only vendors among the global top five to record year-over-year gains.

The market outlook in Q1, 2026

Samsung returned to the number one spot for the quarter, thanks in part to the demand for the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. Even with a later-than-usual launch, shipments still rose 3.6% compared to last year. 

The company also filled the gap with earlier releases in its midrange A series, which helped stabilize volumes.

Apple followed in second place, with the iPhone 17 series seeing particularly strong demand in China. The company recorded more than 30% growth in the mainland, contributing to a 3.3% increase globally. That said, IDC notes that supply disruptions and weaker channel support in some regions kept that growth in check.

For the rest of the top five, things were a bit more muted. Xiaomi held onto third place despite posting the largest decline among the group. 

Oppo came in fourth, with stronger performance in China offsetting weaker international results. Notably, Oppo’s data now also includes Realme. Vivo rounds out the top five, contributing 7.3% of global smartphone shipments. 

Outside the top tier, there were a few bright spots. Honor, along with Lenovo (through Motorola) and Huawei, all managed to grow. Honor stood out with a 24% year-over-year increase, which IDC says is due to its overseas expansion. 

In China, total shipments reached about 69 million units, down 3.3% from a year ago. Even there, growth from Huawei and Apple wasn’t enough to offset the broader slowdown.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories! 

(Source)

The post Smartphone shipments slip in Q1 2026, while Apple and Samsung continue to grow share appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung Display is facing a significant supply disruption in China this April, according to recent industry reports. All display orders scheduled for the month have reportedly been cancelled, with no fresh stock available for shipment. Distributors are currently relying only on existing inventory, indicating a sudden halt in supply flow.

Sources suggest that there has been internal confirmation of zero stock availability for the April dispatch. While early signs of disruption appeared as shipment delays at the beginning of the month, the situation quickly escalated into complete order cancellations. This specifically affects Distributor Purchase (DP) orders across the region.

The impact is being felt widely among offline distributors, many of whom have been formally notified about the lack of stock. Major distribution partners, including Hanlinhui and Samsung Pengtai, are among those affected. As a result, distributors have entered an inventory depletion phase, with no new stock being added to the supply chain.

Pricing has also started to shift due to tightening supply. Hanlinhui reportedly resumed limited shipping on April 13, but without subsidies. This has led to an approximate price increase of ¥100 (~$15), signaling rising costs and constrained availability.

Samsung Pengtai continues to supply products to JD.com, but it is operating solely on remaining inventory and is unable to secure new stock at this time.

The disruption points to a short-term supply crunch in China’s display market. It may lead to broader price increases and could reflect underlying production or logistics challenges within Samsung Display’s operations.

Read More:

• XChat vs WeChat: Can Elon Musk’s App Really Beat the Super App King of China?
• China’s Unitree Sells Cheapest Humanoid Robots Online with R1 Global Launch
• Samsung Galaxy Watch Users Report Battery Drain Issue After Recent Updates

(via)

The post Samsung Display Crisis: China Supply Suddenly Stops in April appeared first on Gizmochina.

A growing number of Samsung Galaxy Watch users are reporting unusual battery drain across several models. The issue appears to have started after recent software updates. Many users say their smartwatch battery is draining much faster than usual, even though their daily usage habits have not changed.

Affected Devices

The problem has been reported on multiple devices, including the Samsung Galaxy Watch6, Samsung Galaxy Watch7, Samsung Galaxy Watch8, and the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra. Some users claim their battery life has dropped from around four days to just two days after the update.

Suspected Cause

The issue is widely believed to be linked to Google Play Services. This system service handles important tasks such as app syncing, location tracking, and background processes. Reports suggest it may be running abnormally in the background, causing frequent CPU wake-ups and increased power consumption.

User Reports and Behavior

Users on forums like Reddit have described the battery drain as sudden and severe. In some cases, Google Play Services alone is said to consume more than 10% of the battery. Restarting the watch may temporarily reduce this usage, but the problem often returns. Some users have also noticed missing or inaccurate battery usage stats.

Temporary Fixes and Current Status

Basic troubleshooting steps like restarting the watch, clearing the cache, or performing a full reset have been tried by many users. However, these fixes only provide temporary relief and are not reliable.

As of now, there has been no official response from Samsung or Google. The exact cause remains unclear, and users may need to wait for a future software update to fully resolve the issue.

Read More:

• OPPO A6s Pro Launched With 7000mAh Battery, 80W Charging – Full Specs
• XPeng with Huawei Launches the World’s Most Advanced AI Headlights Yet
• XChat vs WeChat: Can Elon Musk’s App Really Beat the Super App King of China?

(via)

The post Samsung Galaxy Watch Users Report Battery Drain Issue After Recent Updates appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung has stretched the One UI 8.5 beta program long enough to make it the longest One UI beta program in the company’s history. While that can be frustrating, it has allowed the brand to release the One UI 8.5 beta to a larger number of Galaxy devices, thus becoming the company’s biggest beta program to date.

The beta program went live in early December 2025, starting with the Galaxy S25 series, and it didn’t expand to other devices for the next three months. That long gap led to rumors that the beta program might remain exclusive to the Galaxy S25 series. But Samsung had other plans.

In mid-March 2026, the One UI 8.5 beta expanded to Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Galaxy Z Flip 7 for the first time. The beta rollout has since expanded to over a dozen Galaxy devices. What surprised us the most is the inclusion of Galaxy A-series phones, which typically don’t receive minor One UI releases. The list also includes three generations of FE phones, for the first time.

As of writing this post, the One UI 8.5 beta program is available for a total of 21 Galaxy devices. Here’s the complete list:

• Galaxy S25 series, S24 series, S23 series
• Galaxy S25 FE, S24 FE, S23 FE
• Galaxy Z Fold 7, Fold 6, Fold 5
• Galaxy Z Flip 6, Flip 6, Flip 5
• Galaxy Tab S11, Tab S11 Ultra
• Galaxy A55, A36, A35

That’s 21 devices in total, more than the total number of Galaxy devices that participated in previous One UI beta programs. The One UI 8.0 beta had about 18 eligible devices, while the One UI 7 beta had only 12. The One UI 6.1 and One UI 6.1.1 beta programs had fewer than 15 eligible devices each.

While it’s good to see Samsung doing the hard work to bring the One UI 8.5 beta to a larger user base, there’s still room for improvement. Samsung could’ve done a better job of expanding the beta, particularly in the first few months. And for the Galaxy S25 series, Samsung appears to be prolonging the beta program, given that recent beta builds have had no critical bugs. It has already received nine One UI 8.5 betas, which is already the biggest any Galaxy device has received so far. Still, looking at new features and upgrades in One UI 8.5, the wait is worth it.

Be sure to visit the Samsung section on this website regularly for the latest One UI updates. Alternatively, you can join our Telegram channel to get instant notifications about the latest software updates and breaking tech news.

The post One UI 8.5 beta is now Samsung’s biggest beta program, and also the longest one appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung looks like it’s leaning more seriously into its own chips for 2027. New reports suggest the company plans to increase the use of Exynos processors in the Galaxy S27 series, mainly to reduce how much it depends on Qualcomm. The reason is pretty straightforward, Snapdragon chips are getting expensive. For the Galaxy S25 lineup, Samsung went all-in on Qualcomm’s flagship chip, which ended up costing the company around 3 trillion won.

If Samsung continues down this path, things don’t really get easier. The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro, expected to power the Galaxy S27 Ultra, is said to move to TSMC’s more expensive 2nm process. That would likely push costs even higher. At that point, Samsung either absorbs the hit, passes it on to buyers, or leans more on its own chips to keep manufacturing costs in check.

So the shift toward Exynos isn’t exactly surprising. That said, real-life performance tests paint a mixed picture of the Exynos 2600. It performs well in some areas, but still trails Snapdragon in power efficiency, thermals, and battery life.

As for the Galaxy S27 series, Samsung is said to be aiming for roughly a 50% split between Snapdragon and Exynos. That’s a noticeable jump, and it suggests the company is more confident this time around.

Of course, this isn’t without some risk. Exynos hasn’t always had the best reputation, especially when compared to Snapdragon in real-world use. That said, recent versions have improved, and Samsung clearly has a strong incentive to keep pushing in that direction.

In a way, this feels like a long-term correction. Relying too heavily on Qualcomm turned out to be expensive, and now Samsung is trying to rebalance things.

How well this works will depend on the power efficiency and stability of the Exynos 2700. If it can hold up in everyday performance, not just benchmarks, Samsung might finally get closer to that balance it’s been aiming for.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source)

The post 50% of the Galaxy S27 series rumored to be powered by the Exynos 2700 appeared first on Gizmochina.

Two very different philosophies collide in the mid-range segment with the Nothing Phone (4a) and Samsung Galaxy A57. One leans into bold design, experimental features, and aggressive pricing, while the other refines the formula with durability, long-term software support, and a polished user experience. This comparison matters because both target users who want near-flagship performance without stepping into ultra-premium pricing. The real question isn’t just about specs, it’s about which approach delivers a better everyday experience and stronger long-term value.

Preview	Product
	Nothing Phone 4a (8GB 256GB Black)	Check Price on Amazon

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Major Features:

Preview	Product
	Samsung Galaxy A57 5G (Awesome Navy, 12GB RAM, 256GB Storage), Agentic AI, Triple Camera with…	Check Price on Amazon

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Design and Display

Build and Feel

Nothing Phone (4a) brings a distinctive transparent-style design with mini-LED Glyph lighting, giving it a futuristic personality that stands out instantly. The glass back and IP64 rating feel decent, but the plastic frame slightly reduces the premium touch. In contrast, Samsung Galaxy A57 leans toward a cleaner, more refined flagship-like aesthetic with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both sides and an aluminum frame. The IP68 rating adds a layer of durability that feels more reliable in daily use. Samsung’s design feels more mature, while Nothing focuses on visual flair and uniqueness.

Display Quality

Nothing Phone (4a) offers a sharper AMOLED panel with higher resolution and extreme peak brightness, making it excellent for HDR and outdoor visibility. The colors feel vibrant and punchy, with strong contrast. Galaxy A57’s Super AMOLED+ panel is slightly less sharp but still delivers consistent brightness and balanced colors. Samsung’s tuning feels more natural, while Nothing’s display feels more dramatic and eye-catching.

Verdict

Samsung wins on durability and premium feel, but Nothing edges ahead in display sharpness and visual excitement.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

Nothing Phone (4a) runs on the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, delivering efficient and stable performance for gaming and multitasking. It handles sustained loads well, making it feel smooth over longer sessions. Galaxy A57 uses the Exynos 1680, which is slightly more powerful on paper, especially in CPU-heavy tasks. However, Exynos chips can sometimes feel less consistent under prolonged stress. Nothing feels more optimized, while Samsung feels more powerful in bursts.

Battery and Charging

Nothing Phone (4a) packs a larger battery (especially in India) and supports faster 50W charging, reaching 50% quickly. It also includes reverse wired charging, adding extra utility. Galaxy A57 sticks with a 5000mAh battery and 45W charging, which is reliable but not class-leading. Samsung focuses more on efficiency, while Nothing prioritizes speed and flexibility.

Verdict

Nothing Phone (4a) wins for better battery versatility and stable performance, though Samsung has a slight edge in raw power.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Nothing Phone (4a) stands out with its versatile triple setup, including a 50MP main sensor and a 3.5x periscope telephoto lens. This adds real zoom capability, which is rare at this price. The ultrawide is decent but not exceptional. Galaxy A57 offers a strong 50MP main sensor with consistent results and a better ultrawide camera, but it lacks a telephoto lens. Samsung focuses on reliability, while Nothing adds flexibility and creativity.

Selfie Camera

Nothing includes a higher-resolution 32MP selfie camera, producing sharper images in good lighting. Samsung’s 12MP front camera, however, supports 4K video and better HDR processing, making it more versatile for video content. Samsung feels more polished for creators, while Nothing leans toward detail.

Verdict

Nothing wins for zoom and versatility, but Samsung delivers more consistent overall camera performance and better video capabilities.

Pricing

Nothing Phone (4a) is priced around ₹32,000 ($450), while the Samsung Galaxy A57 comes in significantly higher at around ₹57,000 ($550). This creates a large gap that immediately affects value perception. Nothing undercuts Samsung heavily while still offering competitive hardware, especially in display, battery, and camera versatility.

Value for Money

Nothing Phone (4a) feels aggressively priced, offering flagship-like features such as a periscope camera and ultra-bright display at a mid-range cost. Galaxy A57 justifies its higher price with better build quality, longer software support, and a more polished overall experience. However, the price difference makes it slightly harder to recommend Samsung unless those extras are essential.

Verdict

Nothing Phone (4a) clearly wins on value, while Samsung Galaxy A57 targets users willing to pay more for refinement and longevity.

Conclusion

Nothing Phone (4a) stands out with its Glyph interface, periscope zoom camera, and ultra-bright display, giving it a bold, feature-rich identity. It feels like a device built to impress and differentiate. Samsung Galaxy A57 focuses on durability, longer software support (up to 6 updates), and a balanced user experience. It feels more dependable and polished over time.

Verdict

Nothing Phone (4a) is the smarter buy for most users due to its aggressive pricing and standout features. Samsung Galaxy A57 suits those who prioritize premium build, software longevity, and consistency. The choice ultimately comes down to excitement versus reliability, and Nothing currently delivers more for the money.

Read More:

• XChat vs WeChat: Can Elon Musk’s App Really Beat the Super App King of China?
• OnePlus Nord 6 vs iQOO 15R – Which One Should You Buy in 2026?
• OnePlus Nord 6 vs OnePlus 15R: Is Paying More Really Worth It?

The post Nothing Phone (4a) vs Samsung Galaxy A57 Full Comparison: Specs, Camera, Price appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung has refreshed its TV lineup for 2026, bringing updates to both its OLED range and The Frame series. The changes focus on display quality, gaming support, design, and smarter software features across different price segments.

OLED models get better processing and gaming support

The OLED lineup includes three series: S95H, S90H, and S85H, with sizes going up to 83 inches. The S95H stands out with a new FloatLayer design that uses a metal bezel and sits flush against the wall, giving it a clean, floating look when mounted.

Samsung has expanded its Art Store integration across these models. It includes more than 5,000 artworks from over 800 artists, with collections from the Museum of Modern Art, Art Institute of Chicago, and Art Basel. There is also a rotating Art Store Streams feature that cycles through 30 artworks every month.

On the display side, the S95H and S90H use Glare Free technology to reduce reflections. The S95H supports OLED HDR Pro, while the S90H uses OLED HDR+ for improved brightness and contrast.

All three series run on the NQ4 AI Gen3 Processor. This powers features like 4K AI Upscaling Pro, Auto HDR Remastering, Color Booster Pro, and AI Motion Enhancer Pro. There is also an AI Customization Mode that adjusts picture settings based on what you are watching.

For gaming, Samsung is pushing higher refresh rates and compatibility. The TVs support Motion Xcelerator up to 165Hz, along with NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro. Audio features include Dolby Atmos, Object Tracking Sound+, Adaptive Sound Pro, Active Voice Amplifier Pro, and Q-Symphony for pairing with Samsung speakers.

The TVs also include Vision AI Companion, which supports voice and conversational features through Bixby, Microsoft Copilot, and Perplexity AI.

The Frame series focuses on design and flexibility

The Frame lineup has also been updated with The Frame Pro and the standard The Frame. The Frame Pro uses a Neo QLED 4K panel, which improves brightness, contrast, and black levels compared to earlier versions.

One key change is the Wireless One Connect Box, which lets you place connected devices up to 30 feet away. The standard model keeps built-in ports but adds a Slim Fit Wall Mount and back stoppers to make cable access easier.

Both models include Glare Free technology and support Motion Xcelerator up to 144Hz. With DLG, the refresh rate can go up to 240Hz when connected to a compatible PC.

Art features remain central here as well. The TVs support the same Art Store library and use Pantone Validated ArtfulColor for accurate color reproduction. Buyers can choose from bezel options like Modern Brown, Modern Teak, Modern White, and Sand Gold Metal, along with third-party frames.

Audio and AI features include Dolby Atmos, Q-Symphony, AI Sound Controller Pro, and AI Soccer Mode.

Software and availability

All models run on One UI Tizen OS, which Samsung says will get up to seven years of updates. The platform includes Samsung TV Plus with more than 2,700 streaming options and Samsung Gaming Hub for cloud gaming.

In terms of pricing, the S95H starts at $2,499.99 and goes up to $6,499.99. The S90H ranges from $1,399.99 to $5,299.99, while the S85H starts at $1,199.99. The Frame Pro is priced between $1,999.99 and $3,999.99. Pricing for the standard The Frame models is yet to be announced. The OLED models are already available, while The Frame Pro is on sale now, and the standard models will arrive later.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Source)

The post Samsung 2026 OLED and The Frame Pro TVs Now Available Globally: What You Need to Know appeared first on Gizmochina.

Highlights:

• Samsung may retain only smartphones and memory chip businesses in China
• Likely exit from home appliances, consumer electronics, and display segments
• Strategy shift driven by strong global chip demand and rising pressure in China

Samsung Electronics is reportedly planning a major restructuring of its China operations as it faces a strategic dilemma: whether to defend its declining market share in China or shift focus toward global competitiveness. Analysts suggest the company may prioritize global markets over continuing intense competition in China.

According to industry reports, Samsung is considering a broad overhaul that would streamline its presence in the country. The company is expected to retain only its mobile (smartphones) and memory (semiconductor chips) businesses, which are seen as its most profitable and globally critical segments. Meanwhile, it may exit or scale down divisions such as home appliances, consumer electronics, and display operations, which are reportedly underperforming.

Samsung is likely to continue prioritizing its semiconductor operations in China, supported by strong global demand for AI chips. The company has significantly increased investment in its Xi’an chip plant, with spending rising 67.5% year-on-year in 2025.

The restructuring may also involve workforce reductions in weaker divisions and operational changes, including outsourcing appliance distribution while retaining manufacturing. Despite its low smartphone market share in China, Samsung is expected to keep its mobile business due to its importance in the global supply chain and ecosystem.

Currently, Samsung maintains operations across semiconductors, consumer electronics, and R&D centers in Beijing and Nanjing, focusing on AI, telecommunications, and smartphones. While the plans are not officially confirmed, analysts believe Samsung is moving toward a leaner, more selective China strategy centered on high-value businesses and global leadership.

Read More:

• Alibaba’s Qwen Dominates Open-Source AI: Nears 1 Billion Downloads
• China’s Unitree Sells Cheapest Humanoid Robots Online with R1 Global Launch
• Samsung Expanding AI Anti-Fraud Feature Beyond Galaxy S26, Foldables Next

(via)

The post Samsung’s Big China Exit? Tech Giant May Keep Only Chips and Phones appeared first on Gizmochina.

Highlights:

• Samsung’s AI anti-fraud feature can detect scam calls in real time
• Powered by on-device Gemini AI, originally from Google Pixel phones
• Global rollout expected, with foldables like Z Fold 8 and Flip 8 likely to get it

Samsung is preparing to expand its new AI-powered anti-fraud feature beyond the Galaxy S26 series, signaling a wider global rollout in the coming months. The feature, currently limited to users in the United States, is designed to detect scam calls in real time and warn users instantly if a conversation appears suspicious.

The technology behind this feature comes from Google and uses an on-device Gemini AI model. This means call content is analyzed directly on the phone, ensuring better privacy since data does not need to be sent to external servers. The system listens for patterns commonly linked to fraud and alerts users during the call itself.

Samsung has integrated this capability into its native Phone app through a collaboration with Google. Interestingly, this AI feature was first introduced on Pixel smartphones before making its way to Samsung’s flagship lineup.

Recent findings from code strings in the Google Phone app (version 217 beta) suggest that Samsung is planning to bring this feature to more devices. These include upcoming foldables such as the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Galaxy Z Flip 8, along with other regional variants across global markets.

The presence of multiple international model numbers strongly indicates that Samsung is aiming for a large-scale rollout. However, one notable absence is the expected global variant of the Flip 8, leaving some uncertainty.

Overall, this move suggests that AI-powered fraud detection could soon become a standard feature across Samsung Galaxy devices worldwide.

Read More:

• Alibaba’s Qwen Dominates Open-Source AI: Nears 1 Billion Downloads
• China’s Unitree Sells Cheapest Humanoid Robots Online with R1 Global Launch
• Keychron K3 Max SE Goes Global at $104.99 – Ultra-Slim QMK Keyboard You Shouldn’t Miss

(via)

The post Samsung Expanding AI Anti-Fraud Feature Beyond Galaxy S26, Foldables Next appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung has launched beta programs for every minor One UI update in recent years, though they were mostly limited to Galaxy foldable phones. One UI 8.5, based on Android 16 QPR2, changes that tradition, as the beta also reaches many other Galaxy devices, including mid-range Galaxy A-series phones.

Review the list below to find out if your Galaxy device is eligible for the One UI 8.5 beta program.

Galaxy devices eligible for One UI 8.5 beta program

• Galaxy S25
• Galaxy S25+
• Galaxy S25 Ultra
• Galaxy S25 FE
• Galaxy S24
• Galaxy S24+
• Galaxy S24 Ultra
• Galaxy S24 FE
• Galaxy S23
• Galaxy S23+
• Galaxy S23 Ultra
• Galaxy Z Fold 7
• Galaxy Z Flip 7
• Galaxy Z Fold 6
• Galaxy Z Flip 6
• Galaxy Z Fold 5
• Galaxy Z Flip 5
• Galaxy A55
• Galaxy A36
• Galaxy A35

Note that the One UI 8.5 beta program is live in six markets, including India, Korea, Germany, Poland, the US, and the UK. So, if you have a Galaxy device that’s on the list and you live in a supported region, you can sign up for the beta program to get early access to the upcoming features and upgrades.

We can expect the list to grow in the coming weeks as more Galaxy devices join the One UI 8.5 beta program. We will update the list when that happens.

Related: Check if your Galaxy device is eligible for One UI 8.5 update

How to get One UI 8.5 beta on your Galaxy device

Keep in mind that beta builds may contain bugs and broken features. If you are okay with that, follow these steps to get the One UI 8.5 beta on your device.

Remember to back up important data for added safety.

1. Open the Samsung Members app on your phone.
2. Make sure you’re signed in to the app with your Samsung account. 
3. Tap on the One UI Beta Program banner. If you don’t see this, the beta program isn’t currently available for your device.
4. Accept the terms and conditions to enroll in the beta program.
5. Go to Settings > Software updates and tap Download and install.
6. Once the download is completed, tap Install now.

We’ll keep updating you with the latest developments related to One UI in our Samsung section. You can visit the section regularly for the latest updates. Or, join our Telegram channel to get instant notifications about the latest software updates and breaking tech news.

The post Samsung One UI 8.5 beta program: Full list of supported devices appeared first on Gizmochina.

We’ve been putting the Samsung Galaxy S26 up against flagships from across the market. If you’re curious, it’s already faced off against the OnePlus 15 and the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro.

Today, we’re comparing the Galaxy S26 with a more recent flagship, the Vivo X300s, which launched just last week in China. Both phones sit in the increasingly competitive “affordable flagship” tier. But the two are very different ideas of how a flagship phone should be in 2026. 

Vivo is about bigger battery, higher megapixel counts, faster charging, while Samsung offers refinement, long-term support, and a more compact form factor. Let’s go through them in detail here. 

Design and size

The Galaxy S26, as you might know, is a relatively compact flagship. At 149.6mm tall and weighing just 167 grams, it’s noticeably smaller and lighter than the Vivo X300s. You can actually use it one-handed without thinking about it.

The Vivo X300s, by comparison, is large, and unapologetic about it. At 162mm tall and 217 grams, it’s closer to what you’d expect from an “ultra” phone. The extra size makes room for its bigger battery and camera system, but it also means you’ll feel it in your pocket.

Both phones use glass and aluminum builds, but Samsung uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both sides and Armor Aluminum 2 for the frame. Meanwhile, Vivo offers IP68/IP69 ratings, which technically give it an edge in ingress protection.

Display

No prize for guessing, Vivo gives you more screen in almost every sense. The X300s has a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED panel with a 144Hz refresh rate, compared to the S26’s 6.3-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display at 120Hz.

On paper, Vivo offers a higher refresh rate, higher resolution (1260 x 2800), and features like 2160Hz PWM dimming and HDR Vivid. But in everyday use, you’re unlikely to notice a major difference between Samsung and Vivo.

Performance

Both phones run flagship chips, but from different ecosystems.

The Vivo X300s uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, built on a 3nm process with a peak clock speed of 4.21GHz. Samsung’s Galaxy S26, meanwhile, uses different chips depending on the region: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 in some markets and Exynos 2600 in others.

On paper, Samsung’s Snapdragon variant is slightly more aggressive, with a 4.74GHz peak core speed. But these are flagship SoCs, so everyday performance will feel smooth on either device.

Where Samsung pulls ahead is software longevity. The S26 promises up to seven major Android updates, compared to five on the Vivo. That’s a meaningful gap if you plan to keep your phone for several years.

Cameras

When it comes to cameras, the Vivo X300s goes all-in on hardware. It features a 200MP main sensor, a 50MP periscope telephoto, and a 50MP ultrawide. It even supports optional external zoom lenses with Zeiss optics.

Samsung, on the other hand, opts for a 50MP main sensor, a 10MP telephoto, and a 12MP ultrawide.

There’s no doubt Vivo has the edge in flexibility. Higher-resolution sensors allow for more cropping, and the periscope lens — plus optional add-ons — suggests it’s built for users who want to experiment with zoom and detail.

Samsung’s advantage lies in predictability. Features like Best Face, strong HDR processing, and consistent video performance make it easier to get reliable results without much effort.

Battery and charging

The Vivo X300s packs a massive 7100mAh battery, significantly larger than the Galaxy S26’s 4300mAh cell.

Charging speeds widen the gap further. Vivo supports 90W wired and 40W wireless charging, while Samsung sticks to 25W wired and 15W wireless. Even with Samsung’s efficiency optimizations, it’s hard to see it competing on endurance or charging time.

The S26 does offer reverse wireless charging and tighter accessory integration, but that doesn’t change the core difference: the Vivo is built to last longer and charge faster.

The bottom line

The Vivo X300s and Galaxy S26 don’t really compete on the same terms, even though they sit in the same category.

The Vivo X300s is all about maximizing hardware — a bigger battery, faster charging, higher-resolution cameras, and a larger, faster display. It’s trying to win on specs.

The Galaxy S26 is more restrained. It focuses on usability, long-term software support, and a compact design that’s increasingly rare among flagship Android phones.

Ultimately, it comes down to what you value more: raw hardware or a more balanced, long-term experience.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

The post Vivo X300s vs Samsung Galaxy S26: Specs vs Longevity appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung India has launched the Bespoke AI WindFree Pro Air Conditioner, bringing smart cooling technology and a sleek design to the Indian market. This latest innovation combines cutting-edge features with an aesthetic focus, designed to seamlessly fit into contemporary homes.

Samsung Bespoke AI WindFree Pro AC Specs

The air conditioner offers a unique 5 Motion Wind system. It allows users to choose from five cooling modes: Max Wind for instant cooling, Surround Wind for an evenly distributed breeze, Long Reach Wind for extended airflow, Down Wind for directed comfort, and WindFree mode for gentle cooling without harsh air blasts. Samsung claims the WindFree mode uses up to 77% less energy compared to traditional cooling modes. The WindFree technology relies on 23,000 micro-holes that gently disperse air across the room to enhance comfort without creating cold drafts.

The AI-powered functionality takes cooling to the next level. The AI Auto Cooling feature analyzes room temperature, humidity, and user patterns to automatically adjust settings. The AI Energy Mode optimizes power efficiency and reduces energy consumption by up to 30%.

The air conditioner integrates with Samsung’s SmartThings app, which lets users control cooling settings, monitor energy consumption, and create schedules. The device also supports voice control through Bixby, Google Assistant, and Alexa, enabling seamless hands-free operation.

The Bespoke AI WindFree Pro AC features a luxurious and modern design. Samsung offers two color options, Essential White and Soapstone Charcoal, to suit different interior styles. The slim, minimalist appearance not only blends into modern homes but also enhances their aesthetic appeal.

To ensure durability and performance, Samsung has equipped the air conditioner with a DuraFin Ultra anti-corrosion coating and a Copper Anti-Bacterial Filter, which helps capture dust and eliminate up to 99% of airborne bacteria. The 3-step Auto Clean function keeps the unit hygienic by automatically drying its Heat Exchanger after use.

The AC delivers powerful performance with a cooling capacity of 4.75 kW. The Twin Compressor reduces noise while maintaining efficiency, and the slim outdoor unit saves space without compromising performance.

Pricing and Availability

The Samsung Bespoke AI WindFree Pro Air Conditioner is available for ₹66,990 on Samsung.com and at select retail stores.

In related news, Xiaomi has recently introduced the Mijia Air Conditioner Energy Saving Pro, focusing on enhanced efficiency and intelligent features.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Samsung)

The post Samsung launches Bespoke AI WindFree Pro AC with 5 Motion Wind & AI cooling appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung just rolled out the Exynos 2600 in late 2025, shipping it in Galaxy S26 devices starting in February. As usual, the rumor mill has now moved to what’s next, and Samsung seems ahead in this journey.

The Exynos 2700 has already surfaced in Geekbench listings months before its expected debut alongside the Galaxy S27 series.

Exynos 2700 on Geekbench way before launch 

The listing reveals a chip carrying the model number S5E9975. On paper, it features a 10-core CPU, but not in the configuration we’re used to seeing. Instead of the standard three-cluster design of Exynos 2600, Samsung seems to be experimenting with a four-cluster layout for the Exynos 2700.

That breakdown includes a single core clocked at 2.30GHz, four cores at 2.40GHz, another single core at 2.78GHz, and four more cores pushing up to 2.88GHz. 

These aren’t peak clock speeds, of course, but the early numbers are still respectable. The chip scores 2,603 in single-core and 10,350 in multi-core on Geekbench 6. Interestingly, the multi-core result closely matches what the current Exynos 2600 can deliver, even without reaching 3GHz clock speeds.

On the graphics side, the chip is paired with what’s listed as an Xclipse 970 GPU. Early GPU benchmarking results show an OpenCL score of 15,618.

The test device itself is equipped with around 12GB of RAM and a newer version of Android. That’s fairly typical for early benchmark sightings.

As you might expect, early benchmark leaks rarely tell the full story. These chips are often tested before final optimizations are in place, and performance can change significantly by the time they are ready for actual devices.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories! 

The post Galaxy S27’s Exynos 2700 appears on Geekbench with a 10-core CPU appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung has begun rolling out its 2026 home audio lineup in the US, bringing a mix of new Wi-Fi speakers under the Music Studio series and updated Q-Series soundbars. The focus this year is on smarter audio tuning and easier integration across multiple devices.

The new soundbar range is headlined by the HW-Q990H, which comes with an 11.1.4 channel setup and supports Dolby Atmos over both HDMI and wireless connections. It also includes dual active subwoofers. Like previous high-end models, it uses SpaceFit Sound Pro to adjust audio based on the room, but now relies on a built-in microphone for more accurate tuning. Features such as Adaptive Sound, Sound Elevation, and Auto Volume are also part of the package, handling content detection, aligning audio with the screen, and keeping volume levels steady.

Below it, the HW-Q900H and HW-Q800H carry over most of the same features, including Dolby Atmos, SpaceFit Sound Pro, Adaptive Sound, AI Dynamic Bass Control, and Auto Volume. The differences mainly come down to channel output and where they sit in the lineup. Samsung is also adding the HW-QS90H, which is designed as a single-unit option. It has a 7.1.2 channel configuration with four built-in woofers, so there is no separate subwoofer. A built-in gyro sensor detects whether it is placed on a table or mounted on a wall and adjusts the sound accordingly.

On the speaker side, the Music Studio 7 is aimed at users who want a single speaker setup. It delivers 3.1.1 channel audio and supports Dolby Atmos in both wired and wireless modes. Samsung has added Pattern Control to manage sound direction and reduce distortion, along with AI Dynamic Bass Control, SpaceFit Sound Pro, and Active Voice Amplifier Pro. It supports Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and Spotify Tap.

The Music Studio 5 is a smaller option built for tighter spaces. It uses waveguide technology to spread sound more evenly and includes AI-based audio processing, Dynamic Bass Control, SpaceFit Sound Pro, and Active Voice Amplifier Pro. Connectivity options remain the same as the larger model.

Both speakers work with Q-Symphony, allowing them to sync with compatible Samsung TVs and soundbars. The feature now supports up to five devices and adjusts audio based on how the speakers are placed.

Samsung is also offering control through its Samsung Sound app, which brings device grouping, playback control, and audio settings into one place.

The Music Studio 5 starts at USD 299.99, while the HW-Q990H is priced at USD 1,999.99. The lineup is now rolling out through Samsung’s website and retail stores, with some models expected to arrive later.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories.

(Source)

The post Samsung 2026 Home Audio Lineup Announced with New Music Studio Speakers and Q-Series Soundbars appeared first on Gizmochina.

After flirting with a tri-fold concept, Samsung is now rumored to be working on a wider foldable, much like the Huawei Pura X. We’ve already seen early CAD renders, and the device has even cleared India’s BIS certification. 

Now, the rumored Galaxy Z Fold 8 Wide has also surfaced in the One UI 9 codebase. Newly discovered graphics reveal an outer display mirroring function, along with a form factor that clearly diverges from Samsung’s current Galaxy Z Fold lineup. 

Dig into the image assets, and you’ll find filenames referencing the codename “H8” which has previously been tied to Samsung’s so-called Wide Fold project.

As for the shape of things to come, previous reports hint at a 4:3 aspect ratio for the internal display. Demo images and animations show an aspect ratio hovering around 1.3:1, which is effectively 4:3 in practice. 

For context, the existing Galaxy Z Fold 8 leans closer to a 1.11:1 ratio, giving it a more square-like profile. 

Now, that’s not to say there won’t be the regular Galaxy Z Fold 8. The Wide is a new addition to the lineup. 

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Wide Specifications

Based on CAD renderings, the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Wide measures 123.9 x 82.2 x 9.8 mm when folded. When opened, it thins down to just 4.9 mm at its slimmest point.

The outer screen is said to be 5.4 inches, while the inner display stretches to 7.6 inches. Under the hood, the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Wide is expected to mirror the standard model. That includes a custom Snapdragon 8-series chip, up to 16GB of RAM, and as much as 1TB of storage.

It’s also expected to come with a 5000mAh battery with support for 45W wired and 25W wireless charging.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source)

The post Galaxy Z Fold 8 Wide leaks again, this time inside One UI 9 appeared first on Gizmochina.

One UI 8.5 debuted with the Galaxy S26 series in February and was expected to begin rolling out to older Galaxy devices in March, but users received a series of beta updates instead. It appears we’re still nowhere near the stable rollout, as the company has reportedly planned a few more beta releases this month.

According to the leaked One UI 8.5 beta timeline shared by a user on X, the Galaxy S25 series will receive at least two more beta updates in April. The Galaxy S24 and Galaxy S23 phones may also receive two beta updates this month, while the Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Galaxy Z Flip 6 may receive one.

Here’s the leaked beta timeline:

• Galaxy S25 series
  • Beta 9: This week
  • Beta 10: Third week of April
  • Stable: Not determined
• Galaxy S24 series
  • Beta 2: April 9, 2026
  • Beta 3: April 20, 2026
• Galaxy Z Fold 6, Flip 6
  • Beta 2: April 9, 2026
• Galaxy S23 series
  • Beta 1: April 9, 2026
  • Beta 2: April 23, 2026

If this leaked beta timeline turns out to be accurate, the stable rollout won’t begin this month. This may certainly disappoint Galaxy S25 owners and would also result in a delayed rollout for other Galaxy devices.

Also read: Here’s the complete list of One UI 8.5 eligible devices

It’s surprising to see Samsung is still stretching the beta phase, given that recent beta builds had no critical bugs. The One UI 8.5 build for the Galaxy S25 appears stable enough for a wider rollout. That could mean Samsung is intentionally delaying the stable rollout.

We’ll update you on this when we have more details to share. You can visit the One UI 8.5 section on Gizmochina in a few days to check for fresh details. Or, if you prefer instant updates, don’t forget to join our Telegram channel.

The post Samsung may not begin One UI 8.5 update rollout anytime soon appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung’s next foldables seem to be moving closer to launch, with a new round of certifications in India giving a clearer picture of what’s coming. The Galaxy Z Fold 8, Z Flip 8, and what appears to be a wider Fold variant have all shown up, along with a new pair of earbuds.

Battery units for these devices recently cleared India’s BIS certification, which usually happens fairly late in the process. The listings include multiple battery model numbers tied to the Fold 8, Flip 8, and the so-called Galaxy Z Wide Fold, though Samsung hasn’t officially confirmed that name yet. The new audio product is expected to be the recently leaked Galaxy Buds Able (model SM-U600).

The Galaxy Z Fold 8 and the wider Fold variant are both expected to move up to 5,000mAh batteries (advertised capacity). That would be a noticeable jump from the 4,400mAh Samsung has stuck with for a while. The Z Flip 8, on the other hand, is rumored to stay closer to its current setup, with a battery around 4,300mAh.

Charging could see a small upgrade too. The Fold 8 and Wide Fold are tipped to support 45W wired charging, while the Flip 8 may continue with 25W, which is more or less what we’ve seen before.

The Wide Fold is probably the most interesting part of this. Leaks suggest it could use a wider 4:3 aspect ratio when unfolded, which might make it feel a bit more like a tablet than the usual Fold design. It’s still early, but it does sound like Samsung is experimenting a little this time.

There were also a few extra battery model numbers listed that don’t clearly match any of the main devices. These could be test units or alternate versions, though it’s hard to say for sure.

With CAD renders already out and certifications now in place, the launch timeline seems to be lining up. Samsung is expected to unveil the new foldables sometime in July 2026. The appearance of the new earbuds in these listings adds to that. Details are still limited, but if they’re showing up here, there’s a good chance they’ll be announced around the same time.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source)

The post Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8 and Wide Fold clear BIS in India appeared first on Gizmochina.

When two phones target completely different price segments yet overlap in features, the comparison becomes more interesting than expected. Samsung Galaxy S26 represents a polished flagship experience focused on performance, longevity, and ecosystem benefits, while Nothing Phone (4a) Pro pushes aggressive hardware and standout design at a more accessible price. For buyers deciding between long-term reliability and feature-packed value, this comparison highlights where each device truly stands and which one makes more sense depending on priorities.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

Samsung Galaxy S26 brings a refined flagship feel with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both sides and an Armor Aluminum 2 frame. The IP68 rating adds strong durability, making it more reliable for long-term use. In contrast, Nothing Phone (4a) Pro leans toward a bold, expressive design with its aluminum unibody and signature mini-LED Glyph interface. However, IP65 protection feels slightly less reassuring. The Nothing device stands out visually, but Samsung feels more premium and durable in hand, especially for users who prioritize longevity over aesthetics.

Display Quality

The Galaxy S26 uses a Dynamic LTPO AMOLED panel with HDR10+ and strong brightness, delivering consistent colors and efficiency. The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro counters with a larger AMOLED display, a higher 144Hz refresh rate, and extremely high peak brightness. It feels more immersive and smoother, especially for content consumption and scrolling. However, Samsung’s tuning often appears more balanced and natural in real-world use.

Verdict

Nothing wins on visual flair and refresh rate, but Samsung offers a more premium build and reliable display tuning.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Galaxy S26 is in a completely different league with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 / Exynos 2600 chips, delivering flagship-level speed, better AI handling, and long-term performance stability. The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro uses Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, which is solid for daily tasks but lacks the raw power for heavy gaming or future-proofing. Over time, Samsung’s performance advantage will feel more noticeable, especially with demanding apps.

Battery and Charging

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro clearly focuses on endurance, offering a larger battery (especially in India) and faster 50W charging. It feels more convenient for heavy users who need quick top-ups. Samsung’s battery is smaller with slower 25W charging, but its efficiency and wireless charging support add flexibility. Reverse wireless charging is also a premium touch missing on Nothing.

Verdict

Samsung dominates performance, while Nothing wins on battery size and charging speed. Overall, Samsung feels more future-proof.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Samsung Galaxy S26 delivers a well-balanced triple camera setup with a reliable 50MP main sensor, a dedicated telephoto lens with OIS, and an ultrawide with strong stabilization. It also supports 8K video and advanced HDR formats, making it more versatile for serious photography and videography. Nothing Phone (4a) Pro impresses with a 50MP periscope lens offering 3.5x zoom, which is rare in this segment, but its ultrawide sensor is weaker and video capabilities are more limited. Samsung’s consistency across lenses feels more polished.

Selfie Camera

Nothing offers a higher-resolution 32MP front camera, which may appeal to selfie-focused users. However, Samsung’s 12MP sensor with autofocus and 4K recording delivers more reliable results, especially in video and low light. It feels more tuned for real-world usage rather than just numbers.

Verdict

Nothing stands out with Periscope Zoom, but Samsung wins overall with better balance, video, and consistency.

Pricing

Samsung Galaxy S26 is priced around ₹88,000 (~$900), clearly targeting the premium flagship segment. Nothing Phone (4a) Pro comes significantly cheaper, making it a more accessible option for mid-range buyers. The price gap is substantial and immediately shapes the buying decision.

Value for Money

Samsung justifies its price with top-tier performance, longer software support (up to 7 years), better durability, and flagship-grade cameras. It feels like a long-term investment. Nothing Phone (4a) Pro, on the other hand, offers strong features like a periscope camera, a large battery, and a unique design at a lower cost, making it an excellent value for budget-conscious users. However, the shorter software support and weaker chipset slightly reduce long-term value.

Verdict

Nothing wins on affordability and value, but Samsung justifies its premium with longevity and flagship experience.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

Samsung Galaxy S26 stands out with Samsung DeX, wireless DeX, flagship chipset, advanced camera system, and long-term software support. It feels like a complete premium ecosystem device. Nothing Phone (4a) Pro differentiates itself with its Glyph lighting system, bold design, larger battery, and periscope zoom, features rarely seen at its price point. It feels more experimental and visually unique.

Verdict

Samsung Galaxy S26 is the better choice for users seeking performance, longevity, and a true flagship experience. Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is ideal for those who want a standout design, strong battery life, and good features at a lower price. The decision ultimately comes down to budget versus long-term value, but Samsung clearly leads in overall refinement and future-proofing.

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More:

• Motorola Edge 70 Fusion vs Redmi Note 15 Pro: One Is Smarter, One Is Stronger , Which Wins?
• Nothing Phone (4a) vs (4a) Pro: What Actually Changed?
• Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Xiaomi 17 Pro: Is Samsung Still Worth Double the Price?

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Nothing 4a Pro: Is the Price Gap Worth It? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Flagship smartphones in 2026 are no longer just about premium branding; they’re about how much value and innovation you actually get for the price. The Samsung Galaxy S26+ and Xiaomi 17 Pro take two very different approaches: one focuses on refinement, long-term reliability, and ecosystem strength, while the other pushes aggressive hardware upgrades at a far lower price. For buyers deciding between a safe premium experience and a feature-packed powerhouse, this comparison highlights where each device truly stands and which one makes more sense depending on usage priorities.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ follows Samsung’s refined flagship design with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both sides and an Armor Aluminum 2 frame, giving it a polished and durable feel. It also offers broader SIM flexibility and DeX support, adding a productivity edge. Meanwhile, the Xiaomi 17 Pro introduces a more experimental approach with Dragon Crystal Glass and a secondary rear display, making it stand out instantly. It feels more futuristic, especially for users who enjoy unique hardware touches.

Display Quality

Samsung delivers a sharper 1440p LTPO AMOLED panel with excellent brightness and color tuning, making it ideal for content consumption. Xiaomi counters with a brighter panel, Dolby Vision support, and extremely high PWM dimming, which is easier on the eyes. The secondary display also adds functional versatility, especially for quick tasks and camera previews.

Verdict

Samsung feels more premium and balanced, but Xiaomi brings innovation and eye comfort. The better choice depends on whether consistency or creativity matters more.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 in key markets, delivering flagship-level speed and efficiency. Samsung’s optimization with One UI and longer software support gives it an edge in longevity and stability. Xiaomi, however, offers slightly higher RAM options and faster storage, which can feel snappier in heavy multitasking and gaming scenarios.

Battery and Charging

This is where Xiaomi clearly pulls ahead. A massive 6300 mAh battery paired with 100W wired and 50W wireless charging makes it one of the fastest and longest-lasting flagships. Samsung’s 4900 mAh battery is reliable but feels conservative, especially with 45W charging. Daily users may notice the difference quickly.

Verdict

Samsung wins in software polish and long-term updates, but Xiaomi dominates raw battery and charging performance. Power users will naturally lean toward Xiaomi.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Samsung sticks with a proven triple-camera setup, delivering consistent results with strong HDR, stable video, and reliable 3x zoom. It excels in color accuracy and video features like HDR10+ and stabilization. Xiaomi pushes boundaries with a 50MP triple system, including a 5x periscope zoom and Leica tuning. The larger sensors and advanced video modes give it a clear advantage in versatility and detail.

Selfie Camera

Samsung’s 12MP selfie camera focuses on natural tones and consistency, while Xiaomi’s 50MP front camera delivers sharper and more detailed selfies. Xiaomi also supports more advanced video features on the front camera, which content creators may appreciate.

Verdict

Samsung is more consistent and predictable, especially for video, but Xiaomi offers superior hardware and flexibility. Those who enjoy experimenting with photography will likely prefer Xiaomi.

Pricing

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is priced around $1100 / ₹120,000, placing it firmly in the ultra-premium category. In contrast, the Xiaomi 17 Pro comes in at approximately $700 / ₹62,000, making it significantly more affordable despite offering higher-end hardware in several areas.

Is the Price Justified?

Samsung justifies its price with long-term software support, brand reliability, and ecosystem features like DeX and UWB integration. However, Xiaomi delivers exceptional value by offering better battery, faster charging, stronger camera hardware, and more RAM at a much lower price. The gap feels difficult to ignore.

Verdict

Samsung is a safe premium investment, but Xiaomi clearly wins on value for money. The pricing difference alone makes Xiaomi a very compelling choice.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

Samsung stands out with its polished ecosystem, extended software support, and productivity-focused features like DeX. It feels like a complete, mature flagship designed for long-term use. Xiaomi, on the other hand, pushes hardware innovation with a secondary display, massive battery, ultra-fast charging, and a more ambitious camera system. It feels more exciting and future-forward.

Verdict

Samsung Galaxy S26+ is ideal for users who prioritize reliability, software longevity, and a refined experience. Xiaomi 17 Pro is the better pick for those who want maximum hardware value, faster charging, and cutting-edge features at a lower price. Overall, Xiaomi offers the more aggressive and value-driven package, while Samsung remains the safer flagship choice.

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More:

• Samsung Galaxy S26 vs S25: Is the Upgrade Bigger Than It Looks?
• Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus vs S25 Plus: What Actually Changed?
• iPhone 17e vs 16e: Same Phone or Worth the Upgrade?

The post Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Xiaomi 17 Pro: Is Samsung Still Worth Double the Price? appeared first on Gizmochina.

The shift from the Samsung Galaxy S25 to the Samsung Galaxy S26 isn’t about dramatic changes, but meaningful refinements in performance, efficiency, and everyday experience. With a newer chipset, slightly larger battery, and updated software, the S26 aims to feel more future-ready, while the S25 continues to hold strong as a well-balanced flagship, making this comparison important for buyers deciding if the upgrade is truly worth it.

Preview	Product
	Samsung Galaxy S26 5G (Black, 12GB RAM, 256GB Storage), AI Phone, Photo Assist, Creative Studio,…	Check Price on Amazon

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Major Upgrades:

Preview	Product
	Samsung Galaxy S25 5G (Navy, 12GB RAM, 256GB Storage)	Check Price on Amazon

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Samsung Galaxy S26 keeps a familiar flagship design but refines durability with Armor Aluminum 2 and the same Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection. The overall in-hand feel remains premium and compact, closely resembling the Samsung Galaxy S25. However, subtle refinements in finish and symmetry make the newer model feel slightly more polished. It’s not a dramatic redesign, but it leans toward a more mature flagship identity.

Display Quality

Both phones offer nearly identical AMOLED panels with a 120Hz refresh rate and 2600 nits peak brightness. The S26 slightly increases screen size, making content feel a bit more immersive without changing resolution. Color tuning and brightness remain top-tier, though improvements here feel iterative rather than transformative.

Verdict

The S26 delivers refinement rather than reinvention. The slightly larger display and improved finish give it a more complete feel, but the S25 still holds up extremely well visually.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The biggest upgrade comes with the new Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 / Exynos 2600 on the S26, delivering noticeable gains in CPU and GPU performance. Compared to the S25’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, multitasking feels smoother, and sustained performance should improve, especially in gaming. The shift toward newer architectures also hints at better efficiency and longevity.

Battery and Charging

Battery capacity increases to 4300mAh on the S26, a meaningful bump over 4000mAh. Charging speeds remain unchanged, which feels conservative, but the efficiency improvements from the new chip should translate into longer real-world usage. Wireless and reverse charging stay identical.

Verdict

The S26 clearly wins in performance and battery life. While charging speeds remain unchanged, the overall experience feels more future-proof and efficient.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

On paper, both phones share identical camera hardware, including the 50MP main, 3x telephoto, and ultrawide lenses. However, the S26 introduces new software features like Horizon Lock, which improves video stability and usability. Image processing is also expected to be more refined thanks to the newer chipset, delivering better dynamic range and consistency.

Selfie Camera

The front camera remains largely unchanged at 12MP, but slight adjustments in focal length and processing can improve framing and skin tones. Video capabilities stay strong with 4K support and HDR enhancements.

Verdict

The upgrade is subtle but meaningful. Hardware remains the same, but smarter processing and new video features give the S26 a slight edge, especially for content creators.

Pricing

The Samsung Galaxy S26 is priced around $900 / ₹88,000, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 sits lower at $800 / ₹75,000. This creates a noticeable price gap for what appears to be incremental upgrades on paper.

Is the price justified?

The S26 justifies its price mainly through performance gains, improved efficiency, and slightly better battery life. However, since design and camera hardware remain similar, the upgrade may feel less compelling for casual users. The S25 still offers flagship-level value at a lower cost, making it a strong alternative.

Verdict

The S26 is worth it for those seeking peak performance and longevity. The S25, however, remains the better value pick for most buyers.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

The S26 focuses on refinement, a new chipset, better efficiency, a slightly larger display, and enhanced video features like Horizon Lock. It also launches with Android 16 and newer One UI, giving it a longer software runway. Meanwhile, the S25 still delivers a balanced flagship experience with minimal compromises.

Verdict

The S26 feels like a “performance-first” upgrade rather than a complete overhaul. It is better suited for power users and long-term buyers who value future-proofing. The S25, however, remains a smart and practical choice, especially for those upgrading from older devices.

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More:

• Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus vs S25 Plus: What Actually Changed?
• iPhone 17e vs 16e: Same Phone or Worth the Upgrade?
• Motorola Edge 70 Fusion vs Nothing Phone (4a): Best Mid-Range Phone 2026?

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 vs S25: Is the Upgrade Bigger Than It Looks? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus arrives as a refinement-focused upgrade over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus, bringing improvements that are subtle on paper but impactful in daily use. While both devices share a similar design and core hardware, the newer model introduces better performance, improved efficiency, and smarter processing. This comparison breaks down the key differences and upgrades that actually matter, helping buyers understand whether the latest generation is worth the extra investment.

Preview	Product
	Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus 5G (Black, 12GB RAM, 256GB Storage), AI Phone, Photo Assist, Creative…	Check Price on Amazon

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Major Upgrades:

Preview	Product
	Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus 5G (12GB RAM + 256GB Storage) Silver Shadow	Check Price on Amazon

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The design language remains largely unchanged, but the Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus brings subtle refinements in finish and frame durability. The upgraded Armor Aluminum 2 and improved glass treatment give it a slightly more premium and polished feel. While the Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus still feels flagship-grade, the newer model comes across as more refined in hand, even if the visual differences are minimal.

Display Quality

Both devices share the same core display specs, but the S26 Plus introduces better panel tuning and slightly higher pixel density. Colors appear more vibrant, and brightness handling feels more controlled in extreme lighting. The improvement isn’t drastic, but side-by-side usage reveals a cleaner, more refined viewing experience on the newer model.

Verdict

No major overhaul, but the S26 Plus delivers small refinements that make the display and build feel more premium overall.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

This is where the biggest upgrade lies. The S26 Plus moves to Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 / Exynos 2600, offering a clear jump in performance over the previous generation chip in the S25 Plus. Expect faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming stability. The difference feels noticeable, especially under heavy usage, making the newer model more future-proof.

Battery and Charging

Battery capacity stays the same, but efficiency improves on the S26 Plus thanks to the newer chipset. Wireless charging also gets a bump (20W vs 15W), which adds real convenience. Daily usage feels slightly longer-lasting, even without a capacity increase.

Verdict

Performance and efficiency upgrades make the S26 Plus a meaningful step forward over the S25 Plus.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Hardware remains identical, but the S26 Plus benefits from improved image processing and new features like Horizon Lock. Photos show better dynamic range and more consistent HDR, especially in tricky lighting. Video stabilization also feels more refined, making footage look smoother.

Selfie Camera

The front camera is mostly unchanged, but software tuning improves color accuracy and HDR handling on the S26 Plus. The difference is subtle but noticeable in portraits and social media shots.

Verdict

No hardware changes, but smarter processing gives the S26 Plus a clear edge in real-world photography.

Pricing

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus comes in at around $1100 (₹120,000), while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus is priced closer to $1000 (₹100,000). The gap reflects the generational upgrade rather than a complete redesign.

Value for Money

The S25 Plus offers excellent value since most core features remain similar. However, the S26 Plus justifies its higher price with meaningful upgrades in performance, efficiency, and software processing. It feels like a smarter long-term investment rather than just a yearly refresh.

Verdict

S25 Plus wins on value, but S26 Plus is better suited for those wanting the latest performance gains.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

The S26 Plus stands out mainly through its new chipset, improved efficiency, faster wireless charging, and enhanced camera processing. These upgrades may seem incremental on paper, but they translate into smoother daily usage and better longevity. The S25 Plus, meanwhile, still delivers a flagship experience with fewer compromises.

Verdict

The S26 Plus is a refinement-focused upgrade, not a redesign. It’s the better choice for performance-focused users, while the S25 Plus remains a strong alternative for those prioritizing value over incremental improvements.

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More:

• iPhone 17e vs 16e: Same Phone or Worth the Upgrade?
• Motorola Edge 70 Fusion vs Nothing Phone (4a): Best Mid-Range Phone 2026?
• Galaxy S26 Plus vs iPhone 17: Value vs Power – Which Should You Pick?

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus vs S25 Plus: What Actually Changed? appeared first on Gizmochina.

A few weeks ago, Samsung unveiled the Galaxy S26 trio, which includes the S26, S26+, and S26 Ultra. At present, there is no clarity on whether there will be a successor to the Galaxy S25 Edge this year, but it appears that the brand could be working on the Galaxy S26 FE. The said device has seemingly appeared on the Geekbench benchmarking platform, hinting at its development.

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE Geekbench listing

A device believed to be the Galaxy S26 FE, carrying the model number SM-S741, has appeared on Geekbench. The listing indicates a deca-core processor configuration with clock speeds reaching up to 3.30GHz, supported by multiple performance and efficiency cores. Details from the source code also point towards the presence of the Xclipse 950 GPU, suggesting that the phone could be powered by Samsung’s Exynos 2500 chipset.

The benchmark entry further reveals that the device is running Android 17 and is paired with around 8GB of RAM. In terms of scores, it has recorded a single-core result of 2,426 and a multi-core score of 8,004, showing a noticeable improvement over the previous generation, especially in multi-core performance.

The appearance of Android 17 on the test unit suggests that the Galaxy S26 FE could be among the early devices to launch with the next version of Android out of the box. At the same time, the use of the Exynos 2500 aligns with Samsung’s approach of positioning the FE model slightly below its flagship counterparts in terms of raw performance.

Earlier expectations hinted at a possible shift to a newer chipset, but this listing indicates that Samsung may continue with a more balanced hardware strategy. It is also worth noting that benchmark results can vary depending on software versions, and this test was conducted on an older Geekbench build, which may influence the scores.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories! 

(via)

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 FE visits Geekbench with Android 17, Exynos 2500 appeared first on Gizmochina.

The flagship battle in 2026 feels more divided than ever, and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus and iPhone 17 sit right at the center of it. Samsung leans into raw hardware, bigger displays, and feature-packed versatility, while Apple focuses on refinement, efficiency, and seamless ecosystem integration. Both aim to deliver a premium experience, but they approach it in completely different ways. For buyers in this segment, understanding these differences matters more than ever, because the better phone isn’t just about specs, it’s about which experience fits everyday use more naturally.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus brings a premium glass-and-aluminum build with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both sides and Samsung’s Armor Aluminum frame, delivering a sturdy yet refined feel. The flat design and symmetrical finish lean toward a modern flagship aesthetic. On the other hand, the iPhone 17 keeps Apple’s signature minimalism with Ceramic Shield 2 and a polished aluminum frame. It feels slightly more compact and easier to handle, with Apple’s finishing often perceived as more “tight” and polished in hand.

Display Quality

Samsung leads with a 6.7-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED panel featuring 1440p resolution and strong brightness levels. It feels sharper and more immersive, especially for media consumption. The iPhone 17 counters with a 6.3-inch Super Retina XDR OLED panel, offering excellent color accuracy and higher peak brightness, making it slightly better outdoors.

Verdict

Samsung offers a bigger, sharper, and more immersive display, while Apple delivers better brightness control and color tuning. For entertainment, Samsung feels more satisfying; for consistency, Apple still holds strong.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Galaxy S26 Plus runs on Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600, depending on region, paired with 12GB RAM. It delivers strong multitasking and gaming performance, especially with higher RAM headroom. The iPhone 17, powered by the A19 chip, continues Apple’s trend of superior efficiency and optimization. Despite having 8GB RAM, it often feels faster in real-world usage due to tighter software integration.

Battery and Charging

Samsung packs a larger 4900mAh battery with faster 45W wired charging and reverse wireless support. It feels more versatile for heavy users. The iPhone 17 has a smaller battery but compensates with excellent optimization and improved wireless charging speeds, including MagSafe.

Verdict

Samsung wins on raw specs, battery size, and charging flexibility. However, Apple’s efficiency keeps it competitive. For power users, Samsung feels more future-proof; for balanced performance, Apple remains reliable.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Galaxy S26 Plus features a triple-camera setup with a dedicated telephoto lens, enabling true optical zoom. This adds versatility for portraits and long-range shots. The iPhone 17 sticks to a dual-camera system but upgrades both sensors to 48MP, producing highly detailed and consistent images. Apple’s processing still feels more natural and predictable in most conditions.

Selfie Camera

Samsung offers a capable 12MP front camera with strong HDR and 4K recording. The iPhone 17 steps ahead with an 18MP ultrawide selfie camera, enhanced by depth sensing and spatial video features, making it more versatile for content creation.

Verdict

Samsung provides more flexibility with zoom and features, while Apple delivers better consistency and video quality. For versatility, Samsung stands out; for reliability and video, Apple still feels more refined.

Pricing

The Galaxy S26 Plus is priced around ₹1,20,000, positioning it firmly in the premium flagship segment. The iPhone 17 comes in at approximately ₹83,000, making it significantly more accessible.

Is the price justified?

Samsung justifies its higher price with a sharper display, larger battery, more RAM, and additional camera hardware. It feels like a “complete flagship package.” However, the iPhone 17 delivers excellent performance, strong cameras, and long-term software support at a much lower cost, making it feel like a smarter buy for most users.

Verdict

The iPhone 17 clearly wins on value for money. Samsung offers more hardware, but Apple delivers a better price-to-performance balance.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

The Galaxy S26 Plus stands out with features like Samsung DeX, higher RAM, a telephoto lens, and a sharper display. It is built for users who want maximum hardware and productivity features. The iPhone 17 focuses on ecosystem strength, satellite connectivity, smoother optimization, and consistent camera performance, making it more lifestyle-oriented.

Verdict

The Galaxy S26 Plus is ideal for power users who want top-tier specs and flexibility. The iPhone 17, however, feels like the more balanced and practical choice for most buyers, offering strong performance, reliability, and better overall value without stretching the budget.

iPhone 17 – better value, performance efficiency, and camera consistency
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus – better for power users needing display, battery, and versatility

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More:

• Galaxy S26 vs OnePlus 15: Is Samsung Still Worth the Extra Price?
• Samsung Galaxy S26 vs iPhone 17e: Which One Makes Sense to Buy?
• Galaxy S26 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Specs, Camera, Battery Compared

The post Galaxy S26 Plus vs iPhone 17: Value vs Power – Which Should You Pick? appeared first on Gizmochina.

The One UI 8.5 beta program was limited to the Galaxy S25 series for months, and just when users were expecting the stable rollout to begin, Samsung started expanding the beta program to more Galaxy devices.

In early March 2026, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Galaxy Z Flip 7 joined the One UI 8.5 beta program, and later that month, the beta expanded to the Galaxy S24 series, Galaxy S25 FE, Galaxy S24 FE, Galaxy Tab S11 series, Galaxy Z Fold 6, and Galaxy Z Flip 6. The list may still be incomplete as more Galaxy devices could get the One UI 8.5 beta in the coming weeks.

These Galaxy devices may receive One UI 8.5 beta soon

• Galaxy S23
• Galaxy S23+
• Galaxy S23 Ultra
• Galaxy Z Fold 5
• Galaxy Z Flip 5

Earlier this week, the first One UI 8.5 beta build for these Galaxy smartphones was spotted (1, 2) on Samsung’s servers, suggesting that the brand could open the One UI 8.5 beta program for them soon.

While opening the beta program would allow more Samsung users to gain early access to the upcoming features and upgrades, it could also result in some delay to the stable rollout.

One UI 8.5 is still based on Android 16, but it uses a newer QPR2 build that brings extra features and enhancements from Google. Plus, the update includes a host of new features and changes from the One UI team, including a fully customizable Quick Settings, allowing you to resize, rearrange, and organize toggles and sliders.

The update also includes updated app icons, featuring a bit of 3D effect, for the first-party apps at least. Further, the lock screen has been updated to automatically adjust the clock and date. It can now show weather visuals based on the current conditions.

A key upgrade in One UI 8.5 is the adoption of a modern floating tab bar UI, a pill-shaped UI element with a frosted color scheme, replacing the traditional plain tab bar at the bottom. The new software introduces “Now Nudge” to proactively suggest actions and information based on the content on the screen. It also introduces some important features, including Partial screen recording, Audio broadcast, Storage share, Failed authentication lock, and Theft protection. You can read more about One UI 8.5 on this page.

Remember to visit the Samsung section on this website regularly for fresh information. If you prefer to receive news as they happen, join our Telegram channel.

The post Samsung may soon release One UI 8.5 beta for these Galaxy devices appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung has only just rolled out the Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro, so seeing something new already wasn’t really expected. But that’s exactly what turned up, quietly, inside the Galaxy Buds app.

Digging through the latest version of the app, there’s a new name listed: “Galaxy Buds Able.” No context around it, no announcement, just a reference sitting there. And it immediately feels a bit… off.

Part of that is the name itself. Samsung’s earbuds have followed a pretty clear pattern so far, Pro, FE, numbered generations. “Able” doesn’t really line up with any of that. It doesn’t sound like a final retail name either. More like something internal that slipped through.

The model number adds to that feeling. It’s listed as SM-U600, which is unusual because every Galaxy Buds model so far has used the SM-R series. That’s been consistent for years, so switching to something entirely different is hard to ignore.

Then there are small inconsistencies in the app itself. In some places it says “Galaxy Buds Able,” in others it just says “Able.” That kind of thing usually points to something that’s still being worked on, not something that’s ready to be shown.

As for what this actually is, there isn’t much to go on yet. The name has led to some guesses around accessibility or hearing-related features. But nothing concrete so far.

Overall, this feels less like a product reveal and more like an early trace of something in development. The kind of thing that shows up in software before it’s fully figured out.

It might turn into a proper product, or it might not. Either way, it’s one of those small leaks that raises more questions than it answers.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source: Android Authority)

The post Samsung Galaxy Buds Able shows up in app, and it’s not quite clear what it is yet appeared first on Gizmochina.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has arrived, and it takes smartphone capabilities to the next level. This flagship device features a massive 6.9-inch AMOLED display, a 200MP camera, and impressive hardware that sets new standards in performance and functionality.

However, choosing between the storage options can feel tricky. The Samsung S26 Ultra 512GB variant stands out as a practical choice for users who need extra space for demanding apps, media, and workflows.

Here’s a detailed look at who should consider upgrading to the 512GB model and why it might be worth the extra $200 compared to the 256GB base variant.

Content Creators

For mobile videographers and photographers, the 512GB tier is practically mandatory. The S26 Ultra’s 200MP sensor, paired with an upgraded f/1.4 aperture, makes it a formidable tool for content creation. Samsung has also optimized the device to capture 4K video at 120fps and 8K video at 30fps, formats that demand massive data throughput and storage capacity.

Shooting a single minute of 8K footage can consume over 600MB of storage. For creators shooting high-resolution B-roll or vlogs on a daily basis, a 256GB drive will reach capacity in a matter of weeks. The 512GB model provides the necessary headroom to store dozens of active projects locally without the constant need to offload files to an external SSD.

Gamers

If you are buying the S26 Ultra for its gaming prowess, the 512GB variant is the logical choice. The mobile gaming landscape has shifted dramatically, with AAA titles like Genshin Impact, Honkai: Star Rail, PUBG Mobile, and Delta Force Mobile requiring 30GB to 50GB of storage each once high-resolution texture packs are downloaded.

Powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, the S26 Ultra is built for sustained, high-fidelity gaming. The 512GB capacity allows you to keep 5 to 10 massive titles installed simultaneously, alongside your daily apps and media. For serious gamers, the base 256GB model will quickly become a bottleneck, leading to the frustration of constantly deleting and redownloading games.

Future Proof Users

For those who view their smartphone as a long-term investment, the 512GB model offers unparalleled peace of mind. Samsung now guarantees 7 years of software and security updates, meaning the S26 Ultra is built to last well into the next decade.

However, long-term usage naturally leads to storage bloat. High-res photos, 4K videos, app caches, and hefty system updates accumulate rapidly. The 512GB tier future-proofs your device, ensuring you won’t be micromanaging your storage or heavily relying on cloud subscriptions three or four years down the line.

Professionals and Frequent Travelers

Enterprise users and professionals who rely on their devices in the field will also find the 512GB model indispensable. If your workflow involves storing large offline assets, such as architectural blueprints, heavy databases, or high-bitrate video presentations, local storage is king.

This is particularly crucial for frequent travelers. In regions with spotty 5G coverage or restricted Wi-Fi, cloud storage is a liability. The 512GB variant ensures seamless, offline access to mission-critical files without tethering you to an external flash drive.

Who Can Skip the 512GB Upgrade?

While the 512GB model is the optimal choice for many, it isn’t strictly necessary for everyone.

If your digital life is firmly rooted in cloud ecosystems like Google One, iCloud, or OneDrive, the 256GB base model will serve you perfectly well. For users whose daily routine consists of web browsing, social media, media streaming, and casual photography, 256GB is more than adequate.

Furthermore, with the S26 Ultra starting at a hefty $1,299, buyers looking to experience flagship features without stretching their budget further can confidently stick to the base model.

Conversely, professional filmmakers and photographers shooting exclusively in RAW formats or mastering 8K workflows should bypass the 512GB model entirely and look toward the 1TB tier. The 1TB variant also unlocks a RAM upgrade to 16GB, providing the necessary memory bandwidth for rendering heavy video files directly on the device.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

The post Who Should Buy the Samsung S26 Ultra 512GB Model? appeared first on Gizmochina.

AN unreleased mid-range phone from Samsung has appeared on Geekbench, giving an early look at its chipset and CPU performance.

The listing, tied to model number SM-A276B, is widely believed to be the Galaxy A27 5G. The core cluster points to a Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset, which is a bit of an interesting choice. It’s not exactly new, and it already showed up in devices like the Galaxy A36 last year.

The unit tested here comes with 6GB RAM and is running Android 16, likely with One UI 8.5 on top, though that part isn’t confirmed yet.

As for performance, the numbers are… modest. The phone scores 777 in single-core and 1,802 in multi-core on Geekbench. That’s actually lower than what the Galaxy A26 managed with its Exynos 1380. Still, this is an early test unit, so there’s always a chance things improve before launch. NanoReview data suggests the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 matches the Exynos 1380 in single-core and slightly outperforms it in multi-core tests.

Battery-wise, leaks suggest Samsung is sticking with a 5,000mAh cell, which isn’t surprising. Samsung already rolled out the Galaxy A37 and A57 recently, so the A27 will likely sit below those as a more accessible option. For reference, the Galaxy A37 runs on the Exynos 1480, while the Galaxy A57 uses the newer Exynos 1680.

At this point, details around the display, cameras, and pricing of the Galaxy A27 are still unclear. If pricing is aggressive enough, it could still make sense for buyers who just want a simple, reliable 5G phone. But looking at the price jump between the Galaxy A57, A37 and their predecessors, it doesn’t look like Samsung will stick to the ₹24,999 pricing of the Galaxy A26 this year.

Don’t miss a thing! Join our Telegram community for instant updates and grab our free daily newsletter for the best tech stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source)

The post Galaxy A27 appears on Geekbench with Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 appeared first on Gizmochina.

Choosing between the Samsung Galaxy S26 and OnePlus 15 isn’t just about specs; it’s about what kind of flagship experience feels right. One focuses on refined balance and long-term reliability, while the other pushes aggressive performance and next-gen hardware. With both targeting premium buyers at different price points, this comparison highlights where each truly stands and which one delivers better real-world value.

Preview	Product
	OnePlus 15 | 12GB+256GB | Infinite Black | India’s First Snapdragon® 8 Elite Gen 5 | 7300mAh…	Check Price on Amazon

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Specs Comparison:

Preview	Product
	Samsung Galaxy S26 5G (Black, 12GB RAM, 256GB Storage), AI Phone, Photo Assist, Creative Studio,…	Check Price on Amazon

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Samsung Galaxy S26 focuses on a compact, refined flagship feel with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 and Armor Aluminum 2, delivering a premium yet practical design. It feels clean, minimal, and engineered for everyday comfort, especially for users who prefer a smaller flagship. The OnePlus 15, in contrast, leans toward a bold and more rugged presence with IP68/IP69K protection and multiple back finishes. It feels more experimental and performance-oriented, which suits power users who like standout hardware.

Display Quality

Samsung offers a 120Hz Dynamic LTPO AMOLED panel with higher peak brightness, giving it an edge in outdoor visibility and HDR consistency. OnePlus counters with a 165Hz LTPO AMOLED display, Dolby Vision, and richer color handling, making it smoother and more immersive for gaming and media. The higher refresh rate feels noticeably fluid in fast interactions.

Verdict

Samsung delivers a more polished and balanced flagship design, while OnePlus feels more aggressive and feature-packed. Those prioritizing comfort and brightness may lean toward Samsung, while display enthusiasts and gamers will likely prefer OnePlus.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

Both phones run on Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (in most regions), delivering top-tier flagship performance. Samsung adds long-term optimization with One UI and promises up to 7 Android updates, making it more future-proof. OnePlus, however, pushes raw performance slightly further with higher RAM options and faster storage, which translates to smoother heavy multitasking and sustained gaming performance. It feels more tuned for speed, while Samsung feels tuned for consistency.

Battery and Charging

This is where the difference becomes dramatic. Samsung sticks with a modest battery and slower charging, focusing on stability and battery health. OnePlus, on the other hand, dominates with a massive battery and extremely fast wired and wireless charging. It changes usage habits entirely, as charging becomes almost negligible in daily routine.

Verdict

Samsung is reliable and long-term focused, but OnePlus clearly wins in performance headroom and battery innovation, offering a more future-ready hardware experience.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Samsung maintains a proven triple-camera setup with reliable color science, strong HDR, and consistent results across scenarios. Its telephoto system delivers stable 3x zoom with refined processing, making it dependable for everyday photography. OnePlus takes a more aggressive approach with three 50MP sensors, including a periscope lens, offering better detail and flexibility. It feels more versatile, especially for zoom and ultra-wide shots, and its tuning leans slightly toward dramatic output.

Selfie Camera

Samsung keeps things simple with a well-optimized 12MP sensor that focuses on natural tones and stability. OnePlus upgrades significantly with a higher-resolution sensor and autofocus, resulting in sharper and more detailed selfies, especially in varied lighting. It feels more modern and content-creator-friendly.

Verdict

Samsung delivers consistency and reliability, while OnePlus offers more hardware power and versatility. Those who prefer predictable results may choose Samsung, but OnePlus clearly appeals to users wanting sharper and more flexible photography.

Pricing

The Samsung Galaxy S26 is priced at around $900 (₹88,000), positioning it firmly as a premium compact flagship. The OnePlus 15 comes in lower at about $800 (₹73,000), while offering more aggressive hardware, especially in battery, charging, and camera specifications. The price gap makes the comparison more interesting than expected.

Is the Price Justified?

Samsung justifies its higher price with long software support, brand value, and a refined user experience that feels stable over time. OnePlus, however, delivers stronger hardware value for the money, packing features that typically belong in higher-priced ultra-flagships. It feels like a performance-focused bargain rather than a traditional premium device.

Verdict

Samsung is priced for reliability and longevity, while OnePlus offers better raw value. For most users, OnePlus feels like the smarter buy unless long-term updates are the top priority.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

Samsung stands out with features like DeX, deep ecosystem integration, and long-term software support, making it ideal for productivity-focused users. It feels like a complete, mature flagship experience. OnePlus, meanwhile, pushes boundaries with ultra-fast charging, a massive battery, a higher refresh rate display, and more aggressive camera hardware. It feels built for users who want cutting-edge performance and less compromise in day-to-day usage.

Verdict

Samsung Galaxy S26 is the safer, more refined flagship with long-term value and polished software. The OnePlus 15, however, is the more exciting and value-driven device, offering superior battery, charging, and overall hardware advantage. For most users, OnePlus emerges as the better all-rounder, while Samsung remains the choice for those prioritizing longevity and ecosystem stability.

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More:

• Samsung Galaxy S26 vs iPhone 17e: Which One Makes Sense to Buy?
• Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Vivo X200T: Which One Should You Actually Buy?
• Galaxy S26 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Specs, Camera, Battery Compared

The post Galaxy S26 vs OnePlus 15: Is Samsung Still Worth the Extra Price? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Choosing between the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the iPhone 17e isn’t just about Android vs iOS anymore; it’s about how much flagship experience you actually need. One pushes boundaries with cutting-edge hardware and features, while the other focuses on delivering a clean, reliable experience at a much lower price. For buyers deciding whether to spend big or stay smart with their budget, this comparison highlights what truly changes, and what doesn’t, when you move up the price ladder.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

Samsung Galaxy S26 leans into a premium yet practical design with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both sides and an Armor Aluminum 2 frame. It feels refined but also engineered for durability, especially with Samsung’s focus on long-term usability. iPhone 17e, on the other hand, uses Ceramic Shield 2 and aluminum, delivering that signature Apple minimalism. It feels slightly more polished in hand, but Samsung’s finish comes across as more rugged and purpose-driven.

Display Quality

Samsung clearly dominates here with a 120Hz LTPO AMOLED panel pushing up to 2600 nits. The brightness and smoothness make everyday use and outdoor visibility noticeably better. The iPhone 17e’s OLED panel is sharp and color-accurate, but the lack of a high refresh rate makes it feel less fluid in comparison. Apple’s tuning is excellent, but Samsung’s display feels more modern and immersive.

Verdict

Galaxy S26 wins for offering a more advanced, smoother, and brighter display, while still maintaining a solid premium build.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Galaxy S26 packs either Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600, both cutting-edge chips with strong multi-core performance and GPU capabilities. It’s clearly built for heavy multitasking and gaming. The iPhone 17e’s A19 chip is highly optimized and efficient, delivering smooth real-world performance, but with only 8GB RAM, it feels slightly less future-proof compared to Samsung’s 12GB setup.

Battery and Charging

Samsung offers a 4300mAh battery with 25W wired charging and reverse wireless support, making it more versatile for daily use. The iPhone 17e’s 4005mAh battery is efficient thanks to iOS, but charging speeds remain average. Apple focuses more on consistency than speed, while Samsung pushes flexibility.

Verdict

Galaxy S26 takes the lead with better raw performance, more RAM, and greater charging versatility, making it feel more future-ready.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Samsung delivers a versatile triple-camera setup with a 50MP main sensor, 3x telephoto, and ultrawide lens. This flexibility makes it more capable across different scenarios, especially zoom and wide shots. The iPhone 17e sticks to a single 48MP camera, which performs excellently in most conditions but lacks the versatility of multiple lenses. Apple’s image processing is refined, but hardware limitations are noticeable.

Selfie Camera

Both phones feature 12MP front cameras with strong video capabilities. Apple adds Face ID and spatial features, making it slightly more advanced for biometrics and video recording. Samsung’s selfie camera is consistent and sharp, but less feature-packed.

Verdict

Galaxy S26 wins for versatility and overall camera system depth, while iPhone 17e remains strong for consistent point-and-shoot photography.

Pricing

The Galaxy S26 is priced around $900 (₹88,000), while the iPhone 17e comes in significantly lower at $600 (₹65,000). This creates a clear gap in positioning. Samsung targets the premium flagship segment, while Apple focuses on delivering a more affordable entry into its ecosystem.

Is the Price Justified?

Samsung justifies its higher price with a better display, more powerful hardware, additional cameras, and extra features like DeX and reverse charging. It feels like a full flagship experience. The iPhone 17e, however, offers strong value for those who want Apple performance and software at a lower cost, even if it compromises on hardware.

Verdict

iPhone 17e wins on value for money, but Galaxy S26 justifies its price with a more complete flagship package.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

The Galaxy S26 stands out with features like Samsung DeX, a high-refresh-rate display, a triple-camera system, and longer software support. It feels designed for power users who want flexibility and cutting-edge hardware. The iPhone 17e focuses on simplicity, offering a clean iOS experience, reliable performance, and ecosystem advantages like Face ID and satellite features.

Verdict

Galaxy S26 is the better overall smartphone for those seeking top-tier specs, versatility, and future-proofing. However, the iPhone 17e remains a smart pick for users who prioritize value, smooth software, and a straightforward flagship experience without paying premium prices.

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More:

• Galaxy S26 vs Galaxy S26: battery life difference between Exynos and Snapdragon is huge
• Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Vivo X200T: Which One Should You Actually Buy?
• Xiaomi Robot Vacuum 6 Max vs Roborock S9 MaxV Ultra: One Cleans Harder, One Cleans Smarter

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 vs iPhone 17e: Which One Makes Sense to Buy? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung has introduced a new approach to managing motion sickness through its Galaxy Buds 4 Pro and the Hearapy app. The solution uses a controlled audio signal instead of medication or physical remedies, targeting the inner ear to reduce symptoms such as dizziness, nausea, and sweating.

Motion sickness affects nearly one-third of people and occurs when the body receives conflicting signals. The balance system in the inner ear detects movement, while the eyes may focus on a stationary object like a phone or book. This mismatch triggers stress responses. Existing solutions have largely relied on medication or acupressure.

Samsung’s method is based on research conducted at Nagoya University in Japan. The study identified that a 100 Hz sine wave can stimulate the vestibular system, which is responsible for balance. In testing, participants who listened to this tone at 80 to 85 dB for 60 seconds reported reduced symptoms during car travel. The effect was observed to last up to two hours.

The Hearapy app delivers this tone through a Galaxy smartphone, with a built-in timer set to 60 seconds and volume calibrated to around 85 dB. For the effect to work, the sound must be played without interference from music or external noise, and both ears must be exposed before travel.

The Galaxy Buds 4 Pro are designed to reproduce this frequency accurately. The earbuds feature a larger mid-bass driver area, increased by nearly 20 percent compared to the previous model, along with an updated two-way speaker system. They support 24-bit/96 kHz audio via Samsung Seamless Codec Ultra High Quality, enabling precise sound output.

The earbuds also include Adaptive Active Noise Cancellation supported by six microphones, which detect ambient noise and generate opposing signals to reduce it. Adaptive EQ further adjusts sound in real time based on fit and surroundings. These features help maintain a stable 100 Hz tone, which is required for the system to work as intended.

You must also check out our best of CES 2025 for all the coolest tech announcements.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Source)

The post Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro Bring New Motion Sickness Solution With Audio Therapy appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung has unveiled the Infinite AI Wine Refrigerator, a premium appliance designed to simplify wine storage and management through advanced AI technology. The refrigerator uses Samsung’s proprietary AI Wine Manager, an intelligent system powered by an AI Vision camera that tracks wine inventory in real time.

Samsung Infinite AI Wine Refrigerator Specs

The AI Vision camera automatically detects when bottles are added or removed. It scans wine labels to log details such as the name, vintage, and grape variety. The system updates any inventory changes automatically and allows users to monitor their collection through the SmartThings app. It also suggests food recipes that pair well with the wines stored.

The refrigerator offers a capacity of up to 101 bottles. It includes a Triple Cooling Zone that allows independent temperature control for different compartments, ranging from 3°C to 18°C. These zones can be adjusted to store wine, cheese, fruits, or other items with customized settings. It also features a Multi Pantry mode that provides additional presets for ham, nuts, and other foods.

Samsung has equipped the unit with a triple-layer UV-blocking glass door, which reduces 92% of ultraviolet rays to protect wine quality and ensure a stable internal temperature. Inside, the refrigerator features premium materials such as black metal finishes, tunnel lighting, and natural wood racks designed to safely and elegantly hold wine bottles.

The unit also supports hands-free operation with an Auto Open Door feature, which activates with a light touch or voice commands via Bixby assistant. The digital inverter compressor ensures low-noise and low-vibration performance, preserving the integrity of delicate wines.

Pricing and Availability

Samsung has priced the Infinite AI Wine Refrigerator at 6,499,000 won ($4,267). It is available now in South Korea through Samsung’s official online store and in retail locations.

In related news, Samsung has recently introduced an 8TB variant of its Samsung 870 EVO SSD, which comes with a 5-year warranty.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Source)

The post Samsung launches Infinite AI Wine Refrigerator with AI tracking & 101-bottle capacity appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung has shifted to a 2nm process node for its latest flagship chipset, the Exynos 2600, while Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 still relies on TSMC’s 3nm node. While Exynos chips have struggled with power efficiency and thermal control in the past, this move to 2nm suggested a significant improvement in that area. Early leaks also pointed to notable efficiency gains compared to the Exynos 2500, leading users to expect comparable power efficiency between the Snapdragon and Exynos variants of the Galaxy S26 and S26+.

Unfortunately, recent performance and battery life tests between the two chips, including one from YouTube channel AndroidAddicts, have dampened those expectations for users outside the US and China, where the Galaxy S26 and S26+ are powered by the Exynos 2600.

In a previous test, the Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600) consumed 40% more power than the OnePlus 15, which is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and a significantly larger battery. However, what makes this Galaxy S26 vs Galaxy S26 comparison more interesting is that nearly all the hardware, apart from the chipset, remains identical. Performance tuning between the Galaxy S26 and the OnePlus 15 is also quite different, which can heavily influence power consumption. In contrast, it should be nearly identical between the two Galaxy S26 variants.

The test from AndroidAddicts was designed to simulate real-world usage rather than measure peak performance. It included a mix of tasks such as phone calls, video recording, Google Maps navigation, video calls, YouTube, and other social media apps.

The result? The Exynos variant lasted 6 hours and 48 minutes, while the Snapdragon variant reached 9 hours and 26 minutes. That’s a substantial gap for two nearly identical versions of the same flagship. It’s also surprising, given that the 2nm node was expected to deliver better efficiency, and disappointing at the same time, especially since most regions are getting the Exynos variant.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

(Source)

The post Galaxy S26 vs Galaxy S26: battery life difference between Exynos and Snapdragon is huge appeared first on Gizmochina.

Choosing between the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo X200T isn’t just about specs; it’s about deciding how much flagship experience is really worth paying for. One represents the absolute peak of premium smartphones with every feature packed in, while the other challenges that idea by offering surprisingly similar power at nearly half the price. For buyers stuck between “best” and “smartest value,” this comparison becomes far more important than it looks.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leans heavily into a premium, ultra-refined identity with Gorilla Armor 2 protection and an aluminum frame that feels engineered for durability and long-term use. The integrated stylus adds a functional edge, making it more than just a flagship; it feels like a productivity tool. On the other hand, the Vivo X200T keeps things sleek and modern, with a lighter, more comfortable in-hand feel and the added advantage of IP69 protection, which quietly makes it more rugged in extreme conditions.

Display Quality

Samsung pushes clarity with a sharper QHD+ panel, anti-reflective coating, and consistent brightness, making outdoor use feel effortless. Vivo counters with insane peak brightness and ultra-high PWM dimming, delivering a more eye-friendly and vibrant viewing experience in harsh lighting.

Verdict

Samsung feels more premium and practical overall, while Vivo’s display feels more aggressive and visually striking.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 inside the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra delivers top-tier flagship power with better sustained performance and optimization, especially for heavy multitasking and gaming. It feels more refined and consistent. The Dimensity 9400+ in the Vivo X200T is no slouch—it’s extremely powerful and efficient—but slightly less polished under long stress loads. Software support also favors Samsung with longer update commitments.

Battery and Charging

Vivo clearly dominates in battery hardware with a massive 6200mAh cell, paired with faster wired and wireless charging. It’s built for endurance and quick top-ups. Samsung focuses more on balanced efficiency, offering reliable battery life but slower charging speeds, which may feel conservative in comparison.

Verdict

Samsung wins in performance consistency and longevity, while Vivo easily takes the lead in battery and charging convenience.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra offers a more versatile quad-camera setup, including high-resolution zoom options and 8K video, making it ideal for users who want flexibility across all focal lengths. Its processing also tends to produce more consistent flagship-grade results. Meanwhile, the Vivo X200T focuses on optical quality with Zeiss tuning, delivering more natural colors and strong portrait performance, though with slightly less zoom versatility.

Selfie Camera

Vivo takes a clear edge with a higher-resolution selfie camera and wider framing, making it more appealing for social content and group shots. Samsung’s front camera is reliable but feels less exciting.

Verdict

Samsung is better for versatility and video, while Vivo feels more refined for portraits and selfies.

Pricing

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra sits at around ₹1,40,000 ($1300), placing it firmly in the ultra-premium category. In contrast, the Vivo X200T comes in at roughly ₹60,000 ($700), making it significantly more accessible while still offering flagship-level specs.

Is the Price Justified?

Samsung justifies its price through long-term software support, premium build, stylus functionality, and a more complete flagship experience. It feels like a device built to last years. Vivo, however, delivers exceptional hardware at nearly half the price, making it feel like a high-performance bargain with very few compromises.

Verdict

Samsung is justified but expensive, while Vivo offers outstanding value for money.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra stands out with its stylus, DeX support, longer software updates, and highly versatile camera system, making it ideal for productivity and power users. The Vivo X200T shines with its massive battery, ultra-fast charging, Zeiss-tuned cameras, and aggressive pricing, targeting users who want flagship performance without overspending.

Verdict

Samsung feels like the complete, no-compromise flagship for those willing to pay a premium. Vivo, however, quietly becomes the smarter choice for most buyers, delivering flagship-level performance and features at a price that feels far more justified.

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More:

• Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17: Specs, Camera, Battery & Performance Compared
• Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs iPhone 17e: Is Paying Double Actually Worth It?
• OnePlus 15T vs iQOO Neo 10 Full Comparison: Specs, Camera, Battery & Price

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Vivo X200T: Which One Should You Actually Buy? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Flagship battles are no longer just about specs: they’re about what actually improves daily use. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 take two very different approaches: one leans into premium features and productivity, while the other focuses on raw value and cutting-edge upgrades. This comparison breaks down which one truly delivers where it matters most.

Preview	Product
	Samsung Galaxy S26 5G (Black, 12GB RAM, 512GB Storage)_with Other Offers	Check Price on Amazon

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Major Features:

Preview	Product
	XIAOMI 17 (12GB/512GB)|50MP Leica Triple Camera|Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5|6.3″ CrystalRes 1-120Hz…	Check Price on Amazon

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leans heavily into a premium, productivity-first design with its Armor aluminum frame, Gorilla Armor protection, and integrated stylus. It feels like a device built for power users who value durability and multitasking. In contrast, the Xiaomi 17 offers a more compact and refined approach, with Dragon Crystal Glass and a cleaner, lighter in-hand feel. The Xiaomi device comes across as more practical for daily comfort, while Samsung prioritizes a bold, feature-rich identity.

Display Quality

Samsung delivers a sharp 1440p LTPO AMOLED panel with excellent brightness and anti-reflective coating, making it highly usable outdoors. Meanwhile, Xiaomi pushes display innovation further with a brighter 3500-nit panel, Dolby Vision, and ultra-high PWM dimming, resulting in better eye comfort and richer HDR visuals. The Xiaomi display feels more modern and aggressive in tuning, while Samsung remains balanced and consistent.

Verdict

Xiaomi 17 wins for display innovation and comfort, but Samsung feels more premium and productivity-focused overall.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, but Samsung’s slightly higher clock speeds and refined One UI optimization give it a marginal edge in sustained performance. It feels more stable under heavy workloads and long gaming sessions. Xiaomi, however, pairs strong hardware with faster UFS 4.1 storage and a lighter HyperOS experience, which often feels quicker in day-to-day use. The difference is subtle, but Samsung leans toward consistency, while Xiaomi feels snappier.

Battery and Charging

Samsung sticks with a 5000mAh battery and relatively modest charging speeds, focusing on reliability. Xiaomi clearly dominates here with a massive 6330–7000mAh battery and 100W wired charging, alongside faster wireless options. The Xiaomi device feels far more future-ready for heavy users who prioritize uptime and speed.

Verdict

Xiaomi 17 clearly wins due to superior battery capacity and significantly faster charging, despite Samsung’s slight performance stability edge.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Samsung takes a clear lead in versatility with its quad-camera system, including a 200MP main sensor and dual telephoto lenses offering true optical zoom flexibility. It feels built for users who want maximum range and consistency across scenarios. Xiaomi, with its Leica-tuned triple 50MP setup, focuses more on color science and cinematic output. While it lacks Samsung’s zoom depth, it delivers more natural tones and better video flexibility with Dolby Vision and LOG recording.

Selfie Camera

Xiaomi stands out with a 50MP selfie camera, offering sharper detail and better flexibility for content creators. Samsung’s 12MP sensor is reliable and well-optimized, but feels conservative in comparison. Xiaomi’s front camera feels more aligned with modern usage trends like vlogging and high-resolution selfies.

Verdict

Samsung wins for zoom and versatility, while Xiaomi appeals more to creators with better color tuning and a stronger selfie camera.

Pricing

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is priced around $1300 (₹1,40,000), placing it firmly in the ultra-premium category. The Xiaomi 17, at approximately $1000 (₹90,000), undercuts it significantly while still offering flagship-level hardware. This price gap creates a clear difference in positioning. Samsung targets those wanting everything regardless of cost, while Xiaomi focuses on delivering maximum value.

Is the price justified?

Samsung justifies its pricing with features like the stylus, DeX support, longer software updates, and superior camera versatility. It feels like a complete ecosystem device. Xiaomi, however, delivers exceptional hardware, better battery, faster charging, brighter display, at a lower price, making it feel like a smarter buy for most users.

Verdict

Xiaomi 17 wins easily in value for money, while Samsung remains a premium, feature-packed investment.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

Samsung differentiates itself with the S Pen, DeX desktop experience, ultra-refined software support, and unmatched camera versatility. It feels like a productivity powerhouse rather than just a smartphone. Xiaomi counters with a massive battery, ultra-fast charging, superior display brightness, and Leica-tuned imaging, making it feel more modern and performance-driven. The Xiaomi device leans into practical daily advantages, while Samsung focuses on long-term utility and ecosystem integration.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is ideal for users who want premium features, productivity tools, and long-term reliability. The Xiaomi 17, however, emerges as the better overall choice for most buyers, offering stronger value, better battery life, and a more advanced display experience at a significantly lower price.

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the specifications provided and is intended for general informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, battery life, and overall experience may vary depending on real-world usage, software updates, and individual preferences.

Read More:

• Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs iPhone 17e: Is Paying Double Actually Worth It?
• OnePlus 15T vs Xiaomi 17: Same Chip, ₹30K ($400) Difference – Is Xiaomi Overpriced?
• Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Pixel 10 Pro XL: Which Flagship Is Actually Worth Your Money?

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17: Specs, Camera, Battery & Performance Compared appeared first on Gizmochina.

Flagship battles aren’t always about which phone is the most powerful, they’re about which one actually makes sense to buy. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra pushes boundaries with top-tier specs and features, while the iPhone 17e takes a smarter, value-focused approach. This comparison isn’t just about performance; it’s about deciding whether cutting-edge hardware is worth paying nearly double, or if a balanced experience delivers the better deal.

Preview	Product
	Samsung Galaxy S26 5G (Black, 12GB RAM, 512GB Storage)_with Other Offers	Check Price on Amazon

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Major Features:

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leans into a premium, ultra-flagship identity with Gorilla Armor 2 protection, an Armor aluminum frame, and the added utility of a built-in stylus. It feels engineered for productivity and durability, especially with enhanced scratch resistance. The iPhone 17e keeps things simpler with Ceramic Shield 2 and aluminum, offering a clean, lightweight experience that feels more approachable. The difference in philosophy is clear—Samsung aims for maximum capability, while Apple focuses on simplicity and ease of use.

Display Quality

Samsung dominates with a 6.9-inch LTPO AMOLED panel, 120Hz refresh rate, and a massive 2600 nits peak brightness. The anti-reflective coating and higher resolution make it ideal for outdoor use and media. The iPhone’s 6.1-inch OLED panel is sharp and color-accurate, but lacks high refresh rate smoothness and brightness headroom. It feels refined but less immersive.

Verdict

Samsung wins clearly with a more advanced, brighter, and smoother display, while also offering extra utility through its stylus.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 inside the Galaxy S26 Ultra delivers top-tier Android performance with powerful Oryon cores and a strong GPU. It is built for heavy multitasking, gaming, and long-term software support with 7 Android updates. The iPhone 17e’s A19 chip is efficient and fast in daily use, especially with iOS optimization, but it targets a more balanced experience rather than raw power. The difference becomes noticeable under sustained heavy workloads.

Battery and Charging

Samsung packs a 5000 mAh battery with 60W wired charging and faster wireless options, making it more suitable for power users. The iPhone 17e’s 4005 mAh battery is paired with slower charging, prioritizing efficiency over speed. It feels dependable, but not aggressive.

Verdict

Samsung takes this round with stronger performance and faster charging, making it better suited for demanding users and future-proofing.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The Galaxy S26 Ultra offers a versatile quad-camera setup with a massive 200MP sensor, dual telephoto lenses (3x and 5x), and a high-resolution ultrawide. This setup provides flexibility across all shooting scenarios, especially zoom and landscape photography. The iPhone 17e sticks to a single 48MP sensor, which delivers consistent and reliable results but lacks versatility. Samsung’s system feels more like a professional toolkit.

Selfie Camera

Both devices feature 12MP front cameras with autofocus, but Apple adds depth sensing and strong video capabilities like Dolby Vision. Samsung counters with HDR10+ and solid autofocus performance. The difference is subtle, but Apple leans slightly toward video quality.

Verdict

Samsung wins overall with its superior camera versatility and zoom capabilities, while Apple remains strong in consistency and video.

Pricing

Price Comparison

The Galaxy S26 Ultra is priced around ₹140,000 ($1300), firmly in ultra-premium territory. The iPhone 17e, at around ₹65,000 ($600), sits in a much more accessible range. The gap is significant, and it directly reflects the difference in hardware and features.

Is the Price Justified?

Samsung justifies its price with cutting-edge display tech, advanced cameras, flagship performance, and productivity features like DeX and stylus support. It feels like a complete powerhouse. The iPhone 17e delivers solid performance, reliable cameras, and iOS ecosystem benefits at a much lower cost, making it a strong value pick for everyday users.

Verdict

The iPhone 17e wins on value for money, while the S26 Ultra justifies its premium with unmatched features.

Conclusion

The Galaxy S26 Ultra stands out with its S Pen, DeX desktop experience, advanced camera system, and ultra-bright display. It is built for users who want maximum capability in a single device. The iPhone 17e focuses on essentials, a smooth iOS experience, strong optimization, satellite features, and a simplified camera system that delivers consistent results.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra stands out as the best overall smartphone, delivering top-tier performance, a superior display, versatile cameras, and advanced features that clearly place it at the top of the flagship segment. It feels like a complete powerhouse built for users who want the absolute best without compromise.

However, the iPhone 17e emerges as the more logical and value-driven choice. It delivers a smooth, reliable flagship-like experience at nearly half the price, making it far more balanced for most users. The real-world difference simply does not match the massive price gap.

Final takeaway:

• Best overall phone: S26 Ultra
• Best logical + value choice: iPhone 17e

Disclaimer: This comparison is based on the provided specifications and is for informational purposes. Actual performance, camera results, and battery life may vary depending on real-world usage and software updates.

Read More:

• Galaxy S26 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Specs, Camera, Battery Compared
• OnePlus 15T vs iPhone 17: Big Battery vs Big Brand
• OnePlus 15T vs Samsung Galaxy S26: The $600 Flagship That Beats a $900 Phone?

The post Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs iPhone 17e: Is Paying Double Actually Worth It? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Flagship smartphones in 2026 are no longer just about specs: they’re about how those specs translate into real-world usage. The Galaxy S26 Ultra and OPPO Find X9 Pro take completely different approaches: one focuses on refinement, ecosystem, and long-term reliability, while the other pushes aggressive hardware with massive battery and cutting-edge features. 

This comparison matters for buyers deciding between a polished all-rounder and a hardware powerhouse that promises more on paper. The real winner depends on whether consistency or raw innovation matters more in daily use.

Preview	Product
	Samsung Galaxy S26 5G (Black, 12GB RAM, 512GB Storage)_with Other Offers	Check Price on Amazon

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Major Features:

Preview	Product
	Oppo Find X9 Pro 5G (Silk White, 16GB RAM, 512GB Storage) with No Cost EMI/Additional Exchange…	Check Price on Amazon

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Galaxy S26 Ultra brings a more refined and durable build with Gorilla Armor 2 protection and an Armor aluminum frame, along with stylus support that adds productivity value. It feels like a device designed for serious, long-term usage. The OPPO Find X9 Pro, with its glass and aluminum build, feels sleek and modern, and the IP68/IP69 rating adds extra durability confidence. OPPO leans toward comfort and smooth aesthetics, while Samsung feels more functional and premium. The inclusion of a stylus subtly gives Samsung an edge for productivity-focused users.

Display Quality

Samsung offers a Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X panel with 1440p resolution, HDR10+, and anti-reflective coating, delivering sharper visuals and better outdoor usability. OPPO counters with a feature-rich LTPO AMOLED display with Dolby Vision and a higher peak brightness of 3600 nits. While OPPO wins in raw brightness and HDR formats, Samsung’s higher resolution and anti-reflective layer make it feel more practical and consistent in real-world viewing.

Verdict

Samsung wins with a sharper, more practical display and added stylus functionality, while OPPO focuses on brightness and features.

Specifications Including Battery

Performance

The Galaxy S26 Ultra is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 with a high-clocked Oryon CPU and Adreno 840 GPU, delivering top-tier flagship performance. The OPPO Find X9 Pro runs on the Dimensity 9500 (3nm), which is also extremely powerful and efficient. Both phones are clearly flagship-level, but Samsung’s chipset and optimization tend to offer more consistent sustained performance. OPPO feels extremely fast, but Samsung feels slightly more stable under heavy workloads.

Battery and Charging

OPPO takes a massive lead with its 7500mAh silicon-carbon battery, offering significantly longer endurance. Charging is also faster with 80W wired and 50W wireless support. Samsung’s 5000mAh battery with 60W charging is solid but clearly more conservative. OPPO’s setup feels built for heavy users, while Samsung focuses on balanced daily usage.

Verdict

Samsung leads in performance stability, but OPPO dominates battery life and charging speed.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Samsung delivers a highly versatile quad-camera setup with a 200MP main sensor, dual telephoto lenses (3x and 5x), and a 50MP ultrawide. This provides more flexibility, especially for zoom ranges and consistent results. OPPO offers a powerful triple setup with a 200MP periscope lens and Hasselblad tuning, focusing more on hardware and color science. OPPO feels more experimental, but Samsung feels more complete and reliable across scenarios.

Selfie Camera

OPPO includes a 50MP selfie camera with autofocus and 4K recording, making it excellent for high-resolution content. Samsung’s 12MP front camera focuses more on balanced output and video stability. OPPO clearly wins on hardware, but Samsung tends to deliver more consistent results.

Verdict

Samsung wins for overall versatility and reliability, while OPPO offers stronger selfie hardware and creative flexibility.

Pricing

The Galaxy S26 Ultra is priced at around $1300 (₹140,000), while the OPPO Find X9 Pro comes in lower at $1200 (₹110,000). This creates a noticeable price gap, with OPPO being the more affordable flagship despite offering aggressive hardware.

Value for Money

OPPO delivers exceptional value with a larger battery, faster charging, and strong camera hardware at a lower price. Samsung, however, justifies its premium with features like stylus support, longer software updates (7 years), and a more complete ecosystem experience. OPPO feels like the better deal on paper, while Samsung feels like a more long-term investment.

Verdict

OPPO wins on value, while Samsung justifies its price with longevity and premium features.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

Samsung stands out with stylus support, DeX, longer software support, and a more refined flagship experience. It feels like a productivity-focused device built for consistency. OPPO, on the other hand, shines with its massive battery, ultra-fast charging, brighter display, and Hasselblad-tuned camera system. It feels more aggressive and innovation-driven.

Verdict

The Galaxy S26 Ultra emerges as the more balanced and versatile flagship, offering better long-term value, productivity features, and consistent performance. The OPPO Find X9 Pro, however, is the better choice for users who prioritize battery life, charging speed, and cutting-edge hardware at a lower price.

Read More:

• OnePlus 15T vs Galaxy S25 FE Full Comparison: Which Offers Better Value?
• OnePlus 15T vs iQOO Neo 10 Full Comparison: Specs, Camera, Battery & Price
• Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Pixel 10 Pro XL: Which Flagship Is Actually Worth Your Money?

The post Galaxy S26 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Pro: Specs, Camera, Battery Compared appeared first on Gizmochina.

Samsung Display has announced a new film technology designed to reduce glare on QD-OLED monitors while improving panel durability. The technology, called QuantumBlack, will be applied across all new QD-OLED monitor panels released by the company this year.

QD-OLED panels are capable of delivering true black levels by switching off individual pixels. However, reflections from ambient light can reduce perceived contrast in real-world conditions. QuantumBlack aims to address this limitation by lowering light reflectance by 20 percent compared to Samsung Display’s previous film. This reduction is expected to improve visibility in darker scenes, particularly in environments with strong lighting.

The change has direct implications for gaming monitors, where contrast and shadow detail are critical. Lower reflections can help maintain clearer separation between objects and backgrounds, which may improve visibility in darker areas of games such as first-person shooters and survival titles.

Alongside optical improvements, Samsung Display says the new film also increases panel durability. Internal testing indicates that surface hardness has been raised from 2H to 3H. A higher hardness rating generally means better resistance to scratches from routine use, including cleaning or incidental contact.

The introduction of QuantumBlack comes as display manufacturers continue to focus on refining QD-OLED technology beyond core image quality. Several monitor brands have already introduced similar anti-reflection positioning under different names. ASUS refers to its implementation as Black Shield, while Gigabyte and MSI use Obsidian Shield and Dark Armor, respectively, to highlight reduced reflectivity in their latest products.

According to data from Omdia, the global self-emissive monitor market is projected to grow from 3.4 million units in 2025 to 7.6 million units by 2030. Samsung Display currently leads this segment with a reported 75 percent market share.

For more daily updates, please visit our News Section.

Stay ahead in tech! Join our Telegram community and sign up for our daily newsletter of top stories!

(Source)

The post Samsung QuantumBlack Solves QD-OLED Monitor Glare With 20 Percent Lower Reflectance appeared first on Gizmochina.