Oppo has officially confirmed that it will unveil the Find X7 series of smartphones at 2:30 pm (local time) on Jan. 8, 2024, in China. In addition, the Find X7 and Find X7 Ultra smartphones are now listed on Oppo China’s online store for reservations. The official listings have confirmed the configurations and color options of both smartphones well ahead of the official announcement.
Oppo Find X7 series launch date
Oppo Find X7
Reports have revealed that the Find X7 will come equipped with the Dimensity 9300 chipset. The official listing reveals that it will come in four configurations, such as 12 GB RAM + 256 GB storage, 16 GB RAM + 256 GB storage, 16 GB RAM + 512 GB storage, and 16 GB RAM + 1 TB storage.
The Find X7 will be available in four shades, such as Starry Sky Black, Sea and Sky, Desert Moon Silver, and Smokey Purple.
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
The Find X7 Ultra is expected to come equipped with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SoC. It will be available in three variants, such as 12 GB RAM + 256 GB storage, 16 GB RAM + 256 GB storage, and 16 GB RAM + 512 GB storage.
Find X7 Ultra: Pine Shadow InkFind X7 Ultra: Sea and SkyFind X7 Ultra: Desert Moon Silver.
When it comes to color options, the Find X7 Ultra will come in choices such as Pine Shadow Ink, Sea and Sky, and Desert Moon Silver.
The Find X7 and Find X7 Ultra have a similar design, with the front featuring a punch-hole display with curved edges and a dual-tone back panel with a massive camera module. The Find X7 has a triple-camera unit, whereas the Find X7 Ultra has a quad-camera system. The Ultra variant will be the world’s first smartphone to feature dual periscope telephoto cameras. In addition, it will also be the first-ever phone to feature the one-inch Sony LYT-900 50-megapixel camera sensor as the primary snapper.
It is said that there will be a third device called the Oppo Find X7 Ultra Satellite Communication Version, which will come with support for two-way satellite communication. The rest of its specs will be identical to the Find X7 Ultra.
A tipster on X says Samsung has started work on a 17-inch foldable tablet, following up on a leak from the same account in August. The earlier post shared the tablet’s dimensions but didn’t identify the manufacturer. The new post does, although it doesn’t reveal much else.
According to the August leak, the tablet measures 8 inches when folded and expands to 17 inches when opened. The tipster also said Samsung was developing multiple versions and test units, but didn’t share any further details. The latest post is even shorter, simply stating, “Samsung has already started.”
There’s still no word on a launch date, pricing, or the type of display Samsung plans to use. For now, this remains an unconfirmed rumor from a single source.
The idea is not out of character for Samsung. The Galaxy Z TriFold opened to a 10-inch screen. Samsung sold it as a limited run. The last US stock sold out in April. Samsung never pitched it as a mainstream phone. A 17-inch foldable would take that experiment into tablet territory.
Samsung also has fresh sales numbers to point to. Global pre-orders for the Galaxy Z Fold 8, Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Galaxy Z Flip 8 came in 30 percent above the previous generation. Buyers are clearly paying attention to new foldable shapes, which gives Samsung a reason to try larger screens.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
What’s more interesting is that Samsung would not be alone at this size. Apple is reportedly testing a foldable iPad with an 18- to 20-inch screen. The claim comes from a Chinese tipster named Kang, who tied the design to Huawei’s MateBook Fold. Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo suggests a launch in 2028 for Apple’s first foldable iPad. Samsung has given no timing for its own tablet, so it is unclear who would get there first.
For now, you have a company name attached to a screen size and nothing more. Nothing in the leak comes from Samsung. If the tipster shares more, we will keep you posted.
OnePlus Ace 7 and Ace 7 Pro share much of their hardware, including the display, battery capacity and primary camera. However, the Pro model introduces two important upgrades: a more powerful chipset and a dedicated periscope telephoto camera. With a relatively small price difference, the real question is whether these additions justify choosing the Pro or whether the standard Ace 7 already delivers everything most users need.
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
2. Design and Display
Build and Feel
The OnePlus Ace 7 and Ace 7 Pro follow an almost identical design approach, featuring glass backs, aluminum frames and Crystal Shield Glass protection. Both also carry IP68/IP69K ratings, offering strong protection against dust and water. The overall construction and durability experience should therefore be very similar, with neither phone having a significant advantage in everyday handling.
The main difference comes from their cooling systems. The Ace 7 features a built-in cooling fan, while the Ace 7 Pro upgrades to a bi-directional cooling fan. This should help the Pro model manage heat more effectively during demanding gaming sessions. For users who frequently play graphics-intensive games, the upgraded cooling solution is a meaningful improvement rather than just a cosmetic specification.
Display Quality
Both smartphones feature a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display with a 185Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, HDR Vivid and up to 2,000 nits of peak brightness. The 1272 x 2772 resolution also delivers similar sharpness, while 3840Hz PWM dimming provides additional comfort for users sensitive to screen flickering. Neither model offers a meaningful display upgrade over the other.
This means buyers do not need to choose the Pro simply for a better viewing experience. Gaming, scrolling, streaming and everyday navigation should feel equally impressive on both devices. The high refresh rate is particularly attractive for competitive gaming, although compatible content and games are necessary to take full advantage of it.
Verdict
The Pro’s bi-directional cooling fan is the meaningful design upgrade, but the display remains unchanged. Both offer essentially the same premium viewing and durability experience.
3. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The OnePlus Ace 7 runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series chipset, while the Ace 7 Pro upgrades to the standard Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Both use Adreno 840 graphics and offer up to 16GB RAM, with UFS 4.1 storage. Although their CPU configurations are identical on paper, the Pro’s chipset variant offers a different performance positioning.
For everyday applications, multitasking and most demanding games, both smartphones should deliver flagship-level performance. However, the standard Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 gives the Pro an advantage for buyers prioritising maximum processing capability. Combined with its bi-directional cooling fan, the Pro is also better positioned for sustained gaming workloads. The upgrade makes more sense for enthusiasts than ordinary users.
Battery and Charging
Battery capacity remains identical at 9,000mAh on both smartphones, making this one area where the Pro does not introduce a major upgrade. Both support 100W wired charging, along with UFCS, PPS and PD/QC charging standards. Bypass charging is also available, allowing users to power demanding gaming sessions without relying entirely on the battery.
The difference appears in the charging speed, with the Ace 7 reaching 58% in 30 minutes and the Ace 7 Pro reaching 60% in the same period. This is a relatively small improvement and unlikely to influence purchasing decisions. Both phones offer exceptional battery capacity, while the Pro’s cooling hardware adds more value for extended gaming sessions.
Verdict
The Ace 7 Pro has the stronger chipset and upgraded cooling, but battery capacity and charging remain nearly identical. The performance upgrade matters more to serious gamers.
4. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Both smartphones feature a 200MP primary camera with optical image stabilisation, PDAF and support for 8K video recording. This gives the standard Ace 7 a strong foundation for detailed photography, everyday shooting and high-resolution video. However, the secondary camera setup creates the biggest difference between these devices.
The Ace 7 uses an 8MP ultrawide camera, whereas the Ace 7 Pro replaces it with a 50MP periscope telephoto camera offering 3.5x optical zoom and OIS. This is a substantial change in photographic versatility. The Pro is better suited to distant subjects, portraits and zoom photography, while the standard model retains the advantage of dedicated ultrawide shooting. Buyers should consider their photography habits carefully because these cameras serve different purposes.
Selfie Camera
There is no upgrade on the front of either smartphone. Both feature a 16MP selfie camera with an f/2.4 aperture, panorama support and 1080p video recording at 30fps with gyro-EIS. Consequently, users can expect broadly similar hardware capabilities for selfies, video calls and casual front-camera recording.
For everyday social media photography, neither phone has a clear specification advantage. The absence of a higher-resolution selfie sensor or improved video recording capabilities also means the Pro upgrade is primarily focused on rear-camera versatility. Users who frequently record vlogs or prioritise front-camera photography may find the unchanged hardware less exciting than the Pro branding suggests.
Verdict
The Ace 7 Pro is the more versatile camera phone, thanks to its 50MP periscope lens. However, the standard Ace 7 retains an ultrawide camera that the Pro lacks.
5. Pricing
The OnePlus Ace 7 is priced around $660 (approximately ₹63,000), while the OnePlus Ace 7 Pro is priced around $720 (approximately ₹69,000). This creates a $60 difference, or roughly ₹6,000, between the two smartphones. Considering how closely matched their core specifications are, the price gap is relatively modest.
However, the additional spending does not bring a complete hardware overhaul. Both phones retain the same display, battery capacity, primary camera, selfie camera and charging capabilities. The Pro primarily justifies its higher price through the standard Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset, bi-directional cooling and dedicated periscope telephoto camera. These are targeted upgrades rather than improvements across every category.
Verdict
The Ace 7 offers better value for everyday users, while the Ace 7 Pro justifies its premium through specialised gaming and photography upgrades.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
6. Conclusion
The OnePlus Ace 7 and Ace 7 Pro are closely related smartphones, but their differences target two specific audiences. The standard Ace 7 combines a 200MP primary camera, 8MP ultrawide lens, built-in cooling fan and a powerful Snapdragon chipset. It already delivers an attractive package for users seeking flagship-level performance and excellent battery endurance without paying extra for specialised features.
The Ace 7 Pro takes a more enthusiast-focused approach. Its standard Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset, bi-directional cooling fan and 50MP periscope telephoto camera make it better equipped for sustained gaming and zoom photography. However, replacing the ultrawide camera with a telephoto lens involves a genuine trade-off. Buyers should also remember that both phones share the same display, 9,000mAh battery and 100W charging.
Verdict
The OnePlus Ace 7 Pro is the overall winner, offering more meaningful upgrades for just $60 extra. Its superior cooling, stronger chipset and optical zoom make it the better enthusiast phone. However, the standard Ace 7 remains the smarter value purchase for everyday users who do not need those specialised upgrades.
OnePlus Ace 7 vs Ace 7 Pro: 5 Major Differences
1. Processor: The Ace 7 uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series, while the Ace 7 Pro upgrades to the standard Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for stronger flagship performance.
2. Cooling System: The Ace 7 has a built-in cooling fan, whereas the Ace 7 Pro features a bi-directional cooling fan for improved heat management during extended gaming sessions.
3. Rear Cameras: The Ace 7 features a 200MP main camera and an 8MP ultrawide lens. The Ace 7 Pro replaces the ultrawide camera with a 50MP periscope telephoto lens offering 3.5x optical zoom and OIS.
4. Charging Speed: Both have a 9,000mAh battery and 100W wired charging, but the Ace 7 reaches 58% in 30 minutes, compared to 60% on the Pro.
5. Price: The Ace 7 is priced around $660 (₹63,000), while the Ace 7 Pro costs around $720 (₹69,000), making the Pro approximately $60 more expensive.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
Amazon US has the Bose QuietComfort Headphones at just $169, down from a $359 list price. That is a strong deal for commuters and travelers who want light, comfortable headphones with strong noise cancelling.
Is this a good price?
Yes. The QuietComfort Headphones launched at $349 in late 2023, so $169 is less than half the launch price. Against Amazon’s $359 list price, you save $190, or 53%. It is also the lowest price we’ve seen lately, and about 45% below its usual price over that stretch.
Note that Amazon has cut the price before. It sold them for $249 around Black Friday 2023 and $199 around Presidents Day 2026. They returned to $169 during Prime Big Deal Days in October 2026, and this price matches that sale, so there is no reason to hold out for a bigger cut.
Price now
$169
List price
$359
You save
$190 (53%)
Price as of
30 Oct 2026, 17:28 IST
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
What you get
Noise cancelling: Quiet Mode blocks the world, Aware Mode lets it back in, and a Custom Mode in the Bose app sits between the two. This is the main reason to buy these headphones.
Battery: Bose rates them for up to 24 hours with noise cancelling on. A 15-minute charge gives 2.5 hours, which helps if you forget to charge before a flight.
Connections: Multipoint links two devices at once, so you can switch between a laptop and a phone. A headphone jack covers wired use, though Bluetooth 5.1 with only AAC and SBC is dated.
Weight: At 240 g they stay comfortable on long trips. Light weight and gentle clamping are what set these apart from cheaper rivals.
What users usually like and what they didn’t
Like:
Very comfortable and light, with low clamping force.
Noise-canceling ranks among the best in the class.
They fold down, and the box includes a hard case and an audio cable.
Bass-forward sound that most reviewers found punchy.
The Bose app adds EQ and noise-cancelling mode controls.
Didn’t like:
Battery life could be better.
Bluetooth 5.1 is old, and there is no aptX.
Call quality is not a strength.
They can slip off with moderate movement, so they are a poor choice for workouts.
Few new features over the QuietComfort 45 they replaced.
How it compares
Sony WH-CH730N Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones ($128 on Amazon US): Battery life is the case for the Sony WH-CH730N, with up to 50 hours with noise cancelling on. It is a newer budget model, so expect less polish than the Bose.
JBL Live 780NC – Wireless Over-Ear Noise Cancelling Headphones ($139.95 on Amazon US): The JBL Live 780NC packs in more features for the money, according to one review. That same comparison still found the Bose hard to beat if comfort comes first.
Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless Headphones, ANC, 60 Hr Battery ($198 on Amazon US): Choose the Sennheiser Momentum 4 if you hate charging, since it is rated for up to 60 hours. It is an older model now that a newer generation has arrived.
Rival prices on Amazon US as of 30 Oct 2026, 17:29–17:30 IST. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Should you buy it?
Buy them now if you commute or fly often and want comfort and strong noise cancelling at less than half the launch price. Skip them if you want headphones for the gym, take a lot of calls, or need more than 24 hours of battery. The Sony and Sennheiser options last far longer between charges.
OnePlus 16 and OPPO Find X10 take different approaches to flagship smartphone design. While OnePlus focuses on extreme performance, a high-refresh-rate display, and an exceptionally large battery, OPPO puts greater emphasis on camera versatility, display brightness, and a balanced flagship experience. Both phones feature premium hardware, but their differences could make one a considerably better purchase depending on individual priorities.
Glass front and back, aluminum frame or glass-fiber back
Glass front and back, aluminum frame
OnePlus – Better IP69K protection
Water Resistance
IP68/IP69K
IP68/IP69
OnePlus – Higher water-jet resistance
Display Size
6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED
6.59-inch LTPO AMOLED
OnePlus – Larger display
Refresh Rate
185Hz
144Hz
OnePlus – Smoother refresh rate
Peak Brightness
2000 nits HBM
3600 nits peak
OPPO – Higher peak brightness
Resolution
1272 x 2772 pixels
1272 x 2772 pixels
OPPO – Higher pixel density
Processor
Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
Dimensity 9600M
OnePlus – More powerful flagship chipset
GPU
Adreno 850
ARM G1-Ultra
OnePlus – Stronger performance proposition
RAM
Up to 16GB
Up to 16GB
Tie – Same maximum RAM
Storage
Up to 1TB UFS 4.1
Up to 1TB UFS 4.1
Tie – Same storage capacity
Main Camera
200MP, OIS
200MP, OIS
Tie – Similar primary camera specifications
Telephoto Camera
50MP, 3x optical zoom, OIS
200MP periscope, 2.8x optical zoom, OIS
OPPO – Higher-resolution periscope camera
Ultrawide Camera
50MP with autofocus
50MP with autofocus
Tie – Similar camera specifications
Selfie Camera
50MP ultrawide with autofocus
50MP ultrawide with PDAF
Tie – Both support 4K video
Video Recording
Up to 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps
Up to 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps
Tie – Similar video capabilities
Battery
9,000mAh
8,000mAh Global
OnePlus – Larger battery
Wired Charging
100W
80W
OnePlus – Faster charging
Wireless Charging
50W
50W
Tie – Same charging speed
Reverse Charging
Reverse wireless and 5W reverse wired
10W reverse wireless
OPPO – Faster reverse wireless charging
Connectivity
Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0
Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.2
OPPO – Newer Bluetooth version
Special Features
Bypass charging, Dolby Vision, UAV-grade gyro
Hasselblad calibration, satellite connectivity on 1TB model
OPPO – Hasselblad imaging and satellite support
Price/Value
$900 / ₹86,000
$800 / ₹78,500
OPPO – Lower price and advanced zoom camera
Overall
Performance and battery-focused flagship
Camera-focused flagship
OnePlus – Better performance and battery package
Disclaimer: Specs are based on available data. Actual performance may vary. Verify details from official sources before buying.
2. Design and Display
Build and Feel
The OnePlus 16 features a premium glass-and-aluminum construction, with Crystal Shield Glass protection and an option for a glass-fiber reinforced plastic back. Its IP68/IP69K rating provides excellent protection against dust and water, including high-pressure water jets. The OPPO Find X10 also uses a glass-and-aluminum design with Crystal Guard protection and an IP68/IP69 rating. Both phones offer ultrasonic fingerprint scanners, giving them a similarly premium approach to durability and security. However, OnePlus has a slight advantage in water resistance, while OPPO maintains a more understated flagship design.
Display Quality
The OnePlus 16 features a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display with a 185Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision, HDR10+ and HDR Vivid support. Its exceptionally high refresh rate makes it particularly attractive for gaming and fluid navigation. The OPPO Find X10 has a smaller 6.59-inch LTPO AMOLED panel with a 144Hz refresh rate and an impressive 3600-nit peak brightness. Both deliver sharp visuals, but OPPO’s higher peak brightness makes it particularly appealing for outdoor viewing.
Verdict
OnePlus wins for gaming-focused smoothness and durability, while OPPO offers excellent brightness and a more compact viewing experience. Overall, OnePlus takes this round.
3. Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The OnePlus 16 runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, built on a 2nm process, paired with the Adreno 850 GPU. Its powerful CPU configuration makes it the stronger choice for demanding gaming, multitasking and performance-intensive applications. The OPPO Find X10 uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9600M, a 3nm chipset featuring the ARM G1-Ultra GPU. Although it should deliver flagship-level performance, the Snapdragon platform gives OnePlus a more compelling proposition for enthusiasts seeking maximum processing power. Both devices offer up to 16GB RAM and 1TB UFS 4.1 storage, ensuring plenty of room for applications, games and files.
Battery capacity is another major difference. The OnePlus 16 packs a massive 9,000mAh silicon-carbon battery with 100W wired and 50W wireless charging. It also supports reverse wireless charging and bypass charging, making it particularly useful for extended gaming sessions. OPPO offers an 8,000mAh global battery with 80W wired and 50W wireless charging. Its battery capacity is still impressive, but OnePlus provides more endurance potential and faster wired charging.
Verdict
OnePlus clearly wins this category with its more powerful chipset, larger battery and faster wired charging. It is the better option for performance enthusiasts and heavy users.
4. Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Both smartphones feature a 200MP primary camera with a large sensor, f/1.6 aperture and optical image stabilisation. However, their telephoto implementations are quite different. The OnePlus 16 uses a 50MP telephoto camera with 3x optical zoom, while OPPO upgrades the experience with a 200MP periscope telephoto camera offering 2.8x optical zoom and a larger sensor. This gives the Find X10 a significant advantage for capturing detailed zoom photographs. Both phones also feature 50MP ultrawide cameras with autofocus. OPPO further benefits from Hasselblad Color Calibration, while OnePlus offers a laser focus system and colour spectrum sensor. Both support 8K recording, 4K at 120fps and Dolby Vision. However, OPPO’s high-resolution periscope camera makes its camera system more versatile.
Selfie Camera
Both devices feature a 50MP ultrawide front camera with autofocus and 4K video recording at 60fps. The OPPO Find X10 additionally specifies PDAF and a dedicated sensor size, while OnePlus offers HDR and panorama features. Both should deliver detailed selfies and flexible framing.
Verdict
OPPO wins the camera category, primarily because of its 200MP periscope telephoto camera, larger zoom sensor and Hasselblad colour calibration.
5. Pricing
The OnePlus 16 is priced around $900 (₹86,000), making it approximately $100 more expensive than the OPPO Find X10, which is priced around $800 (₹78,500). This difference is particularly interesting because both phones offer premium materials, high-end AMOLED displays, 50MP selfie cameras, wireless charging, and substantial storage configurations. However, their priorities differ considerably. OnePlus justifies its higher asking price with a more powerful Snapdragon chipset, a faster display and a larger battery. OPPO, meanwhile, offers a sophisticated camera setup with a high-resolution periscope lens at a lower starting price.
OPPO wins on value for money, offering a more versatile camera system and premium flagship features while costing approximately $100 less.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, launch timing, and applicable taxes. Always check whether the listed price is for a China unit or a global/international variant when purchasing.
6. Conclusion
The OnePlus 16 stands out with its Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 processor, 185Hz LTPO AMOLED display, 9,000mAh battery, and 100W wired charging. Its IP68/IP69K protection and bypass charging also make it particularly appealing to gamers and power users. The OPPO Find X10 counters with a 200MP periscope telephoto camera, Hasselblad colour calibration, a brighter display and a substantial 8,000mAh battery. Its 3600-nit peak brightness and more affordable pricing further strengthen its appeal. Both phones deliver impressive flagship experiences, but their strengths serve different audiences. OnePlus is clearly designed around performance and endurance, whereas OPPO places greater emphasis on photography and everyday versatility.
Verdict
The OnePlus 16 is the overall winner for its superior processing hardware, faster display, larger battery, and charging capabilities. However, the OPPO Find X10 is the better buy for photography enthusiasts, offering a more advanced zoom camera and better value for money.
Disclaimer: Prices, specifications, and availability may vary by region and retailer. Recommendations in this article are based on editorial opinion, feature-based value, and market positioning at the time of writing. Readers are advised to do their own research before making a purchase.
Early retailer listings have given us the first solid look at how much two of Motorola’s upcoming devices might cost. The company seems to be swinging high with its next proper flagship while keeping a new foldable a bit more approachable.
The Motorola Signature 27 (first shown back in September) has appeared at Portuguese retailer MegaPC. The 12GB + 512GB version is listed at €1,594.90 (around $1,770). That puts it among the priciest regular flagships right now, with only a few specialized camera phones like the Vivo X500 Pro Max sitting higher. Motorola itself hasn’t confirmed any official pricing or release details yet.
To justify that price, the Signature 27 packs the Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, a 1/1.28-inch Sony LYT-910 primary sensor, a 200MP periscope telephoto with 5x optical zoom, a Bang & Olufsen sound system housed inside a metal frame, and a “tactical fabric” rear cover. On the front, it has a 6.8-inch 165 Hz AMOLED display, hiding inside a 7,000 mAh battery.
Sitting alongside it in the listings is the Razr Flex 27, which is expected to be a book-style wide foldable in the same vein as the Apple iPhone Duo or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8. The 12GB + 256GB model is priced at €1,510.90 (about $1,679), with shipping shown for mid-December. Rumors point to it using the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 instead of the higher-end Elite Extreme Gen 6, which would help explain why it undercuts a lot of rival foldables.
The device has also been spotted on the UAE’s TDRA certification database under the model number XT2761-1 (registration ER67054/26, issued October 29), which officially confirms the Motorola Razr Flex 27 name.
Earlier Geekbench listings already pointed to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Android 17, and 12GB RAM. Meanwhile, the European retailer page mentions Pantone Coriander and Pantone Dark Botanical Garden color options. However, it’s worth noting that the same listing incorrectly describes the phone as a clamshell, whereas the Flex is expected to be a wide, book-style foldable.
Huawei could launch several new product in November, even though the company just recently announced the Enjoy 100 series and Pura 90 Plus. According to tipster Smart Pikachu, the Mate X8 foldable is among the upcoming devices, and the leak sheds light on its chipset and camera hardware.
Huawei Mate X8 could get Kirin 9050 Pro
The Mate X8 is tipped to arrive as an 8-inch foldable powered by the Kirin 9050 Pro. We have the same chip in the Mate 90 Pro Max and Mate 90 RS.
The Mate X8 is also tipped to feature a 50MP main camera with ultra-high dynamic range, alongside a 50MP RYYB periscope telephoto camera and a red maple leaf original-color lens. The tipster also mentions telephoto macro photography and slow-motion recording support.
Other parts of the phone have surfaced in earlier leaks. A previous report hints at a 6.5-inch cover display, an 8.15-inch inner screen, and a battery with a capacity exceeding 6,000mAh. The latest tip doesn’t mention these specifications, so they remain unconfirmed.
MatePad Mini 2 and other products may follow
The Mate X8 isn’t the only device Smart Pikachu mentions. Huawei is also reportedly preparing a second-generation MatePad Mini with 5G connectivity and a high-refresh-rate display.
The original MatePad Mini arrived in September 2025 with an 8.8-inch display and support for cellular calls and mobile data. The tipster hasn’t shared the new tablet’s screen size, chipset or expected price, leaving much of its hardware a mystery for now.
Huawei is also said to have a foldable PC and a new pair of headphones in the works. Neither product has been identified by name, and there are no details about their specifications or whether they’ll debut alongside the Mate X8.
The tipster says Huawei still has several flagship and collector’s edition products planned for November. The company hasn’t announced launch dates or prices for any of the rumored devices.
Last year’s Mate X7 debuted on November 26, so a similar launch window for the Mate X8 is possible. However, Huawei has yet to confirm its plans.
At 4.7 millimeters thick and under 450 grams, the Huawei MatePad Pro (2026) is one of the most physically impressive pieces of technology currently available. The PaperMatte OLED display is visually striking, the CNC aluminum chassis feels decidedly premium, and the overall hardware design conveys a genuine sense of forward thinking. In a market where tablets often feel like oversized smartphones, Huawei has crafted something that feels truly engineered.
However, there is a critical caveat for prospective buyers, and it is one that cannot be ignored. The tablet runs HarmonyOS 4.3, which is built on an Android foundation but lacks native Google Services—including the Google Play Store. For users accustomed to a seamless app experience, this omission changes the way the device must be used. The central question, therefore, is whether this is a remarkable piece of hardware that simply requires some patience during setup, or whether the software gap is too substantial to overlook. Having used it as a primary work device for the past week, alongside the Glide Keyboard and the third-generation M-Pencil Pro, here is the full assessment.
Design and Display
The hardware is where Huawei has clearly excelled, and it sets a high bar for the rest of the industry. The 12-inch OLED panel offers a 3K resolution, a 144Hz refresh rate, and a peak brightness of 1600 nits, resulting in a bright, colorful, and exceptionally sharp image. Whether you are watching HDR content, editing photos, or simply reading text, the display remains a pleasure to use in almost any lighting condition. The standout feature, however, is the PaperMatte finish. This anti-glare coating reduces reflections by approximately 30%, making the screen genuinely readable in direct sunlight—a claim that cannot be made for many glossy tablets on the market. It is a practical innovation that solves a real-world problem, rather than a marketing bullet point.
The 4.7mm profile is equally remarkable. The CNC aluminum build feels rigid, with no discernible flex or creaking, giving the device the solidity of a single slab of metal and glass. Despite its slim profile, it never feels fragile, and the weight distribution is well balanced for handheld use. This thinness does come with a trade-off. To achieve such a compact form factor, Huawei had to compromise on battery capacity. The unit packs a 10,400 mAh cell, which drains relatively quickly under heavy use, especially when the screen is set to its maximum refresh rate. It supports 66W fast charging, reaching full capacity in roughly 53 minutes, but it is not the endurance leader among tablets. Users who demand long battery life may find themselves reaching for the charger more often than they would like.
The software experience requires some adjustment, particularly for users outside China. The tablet is powered by the Kirin T93 chipset and runs HarmonyOS 4.3. For basic daily tasks—web browsing, email, and media consumption—performance is smooth and reliable. The interface feels responsive, and the system handles multitasking without noticeable stutter. The ecosystem, however, presents a different challenge. Without native Google Services, users must rely on Huawei’s AppGallery or alternative methods to install everyday applications. The setup is workable, but getting services like Gmail or YouTube to run perfectly requires more time and effort than on an iPad or a standard Android tablet. For some users, this will be a minor inconvenience; for others, it will be a daily frustration. After all, the tablet supporting APK installation has already offered wide possibilities for users, which is definitely better news for overseas users than pre-running the self-built HarmonyOS.
In terms of raw performance, the Kirin chipset is more than capable for everyday work and creative tasks. It handles document editing, note-taking, and drawing applications with ease. Heavy gaming or intensive 4K video editing, however, will not match the top-tier Snapdragon or Apple M-series chips found in competing devices. This is a chip built for productivity, not for pushing the limits of mobile entertainment.
Accessories: A Premium Ecosystem at a Premium Price
The accessories play a significant role in the overall experience, and they are essential to unlocking the tablet’s full potential. The HUAWEI Glide Keyboard features a unique dual-hinge design. Unlike Apple’s Magic Keyboard, which tends to make the iPad top-heavy, this keyboard can be folded into a laptop mode or flipped around for a “studio mode” suited to drawing. The keys offer decent travel, and the trackpad is surprisingly responsive, effectively transforming the tablet into a mini laptop. Typing long documents feels comfortable, and the magnetic attachment is secure.
The third-generation HUAWEI M-Pencil Pro was tested in Huawei’s native GoPaint app, where the hardware and software finally come together. Thanks to the PaperMatte screen, drawing feels remarkably natural, with a slight texture that avoids the slippery sensation of glass. Pressure sensitivity is excellent, and the new squeeze gesture brings up the radial menu instantly, allowing brushes to be switched without breaking focus. For digital artists, this is a genuinely compelling experience that rivals dedicated drawing tablets.
The premium experience does, however, come at a premium price. The keyboard and pencil are sold separately, adding significantly to the overall cost. When you factor in the price of the tablet, the keyboard, and the stylus, the total investment easily surpasses that of a comparable laptop, which makes the software compromises harder to swallow.
The Huawei MatePad Pro (2026) is, first and foremost, a spectacular piece of hardware. It is arguably one of the most beautiful tablets on the market, with a screen, build quality, and accessory set that are genuinely top-tier. The PaperMatte display is a joy to use, and the overall design is a testament to Huawei’s engineering prowess. The deciding factor ultimately comes down to region and app usage. For those already comfortable within the Huawei ecosystem, or for users who specifically need a premium drawing tablet and are willing to find alternative ways to install apps, the hardware is highly rewarding.
For most global users, however, it is a difficult recommendation. At around €1,099 in Europe—before adding the keyboard and pencil—the tablet requires users to adapt their software habits, particularly without native Google support. It is a beautiful device, but it asks for more compromise than most users are accustomed to. If you are willing to navigate the ecosystem, you will be rewarded with one of the best-designed tablets on the market. But for the average consumer, the software gap remains a formidable barrier.
AGIBOT has introduced Worken, a new framework designed to measure how much useful work robots actually complete in real-world environments. The framework aims to provide a different way of evaluating progress in the robotics industry. Instead of focusing on how many robots are manufactured or deployed, Worken looks at their actual productivity, autonomous working time, and the quality of their output.
What Is AGIBOT’s Worken Framework?
The name Worken combines the words Work and Token. The proposed framework focuses on measuring Effective Intelligent Work Hours, giving businesses a way to understand how effectively Physical AI systems perform assigned tasks.
AGIBOT believes that counting deployed robots alone does not provide a complete picture of their usefulness. For example, two factories may operate the same number of robots but achieve very different production results. Robots that work independently for longer periods and consistently complete tasks with minimal human assistance deliver greater productivity.
The same idea can also apply to logistics and service robots. Simply moving around a warehouse or interacting with customers is not enough. These machines must successfully complete their assigned tasks.
How Does Worken Calculate Robot Productivity?
AGIBOT’s proposed formula combines three factors: the number of active robots, their autonomous working hours and their output efficiency ratio.
The first factor counts robots that are actively performing useful tasks rather than machines that have only been manufactured, delivered or installed. The second measures how long robots work independently, excluding waiting periods and continuous human control. The third evaluates completed work against an agreed productivity benchmark.
For example, a manufacturing facility with 10 active robots, six autonomous working hours per robot and an output efficiency ratio of 0.8 would generate 48 Worken.
This approach aims to distinguish between machines that remain powered on and those that consistently deliver acceptable results.
Potential Applications in Manufacturing and Other Industries
Manufacturing could be one of the first areas where Worken becomes useful because production tasks often have clearly defined targets. Businesses could use the framework to monitor robotic productivity, compare similar operations and identify where machines lose productive working time.
It could also help companies evaluate software updates by checking whether robots complete more tasks independently or require less human intervention.
AGIBOT’s existing industrial applications, including material-handling operations at Longcheer, provide potential real-world environments for exploring the framework.
The concept could eventually extend to service robots, where productivity might be measured through completed guidance tasks, customer assistance and successful visitor interactions.
Worken Is Still an Evolving Framework
AGIBOT describes Worken as a developing measurement framework rather than an established universal standard. Its practical usefulness will depend on reliable operational data, clearly defined tasks and suitable performance benchmarks.
It is also not intended to replace other important measures such as safety, reliability, operating costs and output quality. Furthermore, Worken does not represent a universal monetary value for robotic labour.
If developed successfully, the framework could help businesses make better decisions about robotic investments and understand how software and AI improvements increase productivity over time.
Ultimately, AGIBOT’s approach highlights a broader shift in robotics: measuring progress not just by how many robots enter the workplace, but by how much useful work they actually deliver.
Google’s Pixel 11 is down to just $699 on Amazon US right now. That’s $200 off the $899 it launched at in August, and it’s the lowest price the phone has hit so far. This isn’t a one-model sale, either. The Pixel 11 Pro, Pro XL, and Pro Fold are all discounted.
The deals run until November 8. All colors get the same price.
Pretty good! Amazon ran Pixel 11 deals during its October Prime event, but those prices were higher than today’s. Back then, the Pixel 11 was $749, the Pro was $849 and the Pro XL was $999. Every one of them is $50 cheaper now, and you don’t need Prime this time.
The Pro Fold is the bigger surprise. It has sat at or near its full $1,899 price since launch, so $250 off is its first real cut.
Which one should you get??
Pixel 11 ($699) is the one most people should buy. You get the same Tensor G6 chip as the Pro phones, a 6.3-inch screen, IP68 water and dust protection, and Google says the battery lasts more than 30 hours. Wired charging gets you to about 55% in 30 minutes. At $699 it undercuts most flagship phones by a wide margin, and remember, it gets the same seven years of updates as the Pro models.
Pixel 11 Pro ($799) is the best value here. It’s only $100 more than the regular Pixel 11 right now, which is a smaller gap than usual. For that you get the better camera system, with a larger telephoto sensor that pulls in 30% more light, plus Pixel HiLight: the back of the phone glows when your favorite contacts call while it’s lying face down. If you care about photos, this is the one.
Pixel 11 Pro XL ($949) is the Pro with a bigger 6.8-inch screen. Google rates its zoom at up to 120x, the longest on any Pixel. It also has the largest discount in the sale, at $350 off.
Pixel 11 Pro Fold ($1,649) opens up to an 8-inch screen that’s great for video and split-screen work. Google made the back from a new composite material thats lighter and reportedly much harder to crack, and says the new hinge is three times stronger. It’s still a lot of money, but this is the first time it’s been this cheap.
These are unlocked models. They work with Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, Google Fi and most other US carriers.
The 256GB Pixel 11 is the smallest storage size Amazon sells. There’s no 128GB model to trade down to.
With the holidays close, you probably won’t see these prices drop much further before Black Friday for the new series. Prices tend to land at about the same level then.
Prices were checked on October 30, 2026. Amazon prices can change at any time.
Samsung is continuing its habit of making extra-fancy foldables exclusively for the Chinese market. The new Galaxy W27 is basically a more exclusive, dressed-up version of the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, aimed at people who want the top-end hardware with a bit more flair and business-friendly extras.
The design stands out with a dual-tone look and premium golden accents on the frame, hinge, camera module, and lens rings. It also gets the signature “Heart to the World” emblem on the back. Color options are Jihu Blue and Jixia Hong. Build-wise, it uses Advanced Armor Aluminum for the frame, Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 3 on the cover display, and carries an IP48 rating. There’s a side-mounted capacitive fingerprint sensor too.
The screens are an 8-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X main foldable display (2,504 × 2,256, 20.9:18) paired with a 6.5-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X cover screen (2,520 × 1,080, 20:9). Both hit up to 3,000 nits peak brightness and support HDR10+.
Camera setup includes a 200MP primary with OIS, a 50MP ultrawide with autofocus, a 10MP 3x telephoto, and dual 10MP selfie cameras. Everything can shoot 4K at 60fps, while the main and ultrawide go up to 8K at 30fps.
Under the hood sits the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, matched with 16GB of RAM and either 512GB or 1TB of storage. It launches on Android 17 with One UI 9.0 and is promised seven major OS updates, plus Galaxy AI and Samsung DeX support.
Battery is 5,000mAh with 45W wired charging and 20W Qi2.2 wireless. Connectivity covers 5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, UWB, NFC, and Tiantong satellite communication for emergency calls and messages.
Samsung is bundling it in a special collector’s edition box that includes a 45W charger and a Kevlar protective case.
Pricing starts at 18,999 yuan (around $2,850) for the 16GB/512GB model and goes up to 21,999 yuan (around $3,300) for the 1TB version. As usual with the W series, it’s China-only for now.
A slew of new phones are expected to hit the Chinese market in November. Oppo has just confirmed that the Reno 17 lineup will break cover in November. While Vivo hasn’t officially revealed anything, it is expected to unveil the Vivo S70 lineup in the same month. November is also rumored to see the arrival of the Honor 700 series. Reliable tipsters Digital Chat Station and Smart Pikachu have shared interesting details about the lineup.
Honor 700 series to support telephoto extender
According to DCS, the upcoming Honor 700 series will feature a slim-bezel, mid-sized display, a large battery, a built-in rear display, and a Snapdragon processor. The lineup is also expected to include a periscope telephoto camera, while the Honor 700 and 700 Pro will reportedly support a 200mm telephoto extender.
Tipster Smart Pikachu has also teased the Honor 700 series, highlighting its imaging capabilities, long battery life, slim-bezel display, creative rear screen, and support for a telephoto extender. The series is also expected to feature a trendy design and dual Live Photo capabilities for both the front and rear cameras.
Both tipsters have additionally hinted at the involvement of a popular celebrity as the series’ brand ambassador.
According to a recent report, the Honor 700 series will feature a 6.57-inch OLED panel offering 1.5K resolution and ultra-thin bezels on all four sides. On the back, it will have a 1.72-inch display, while its rear camera setup may comprise a 200-megapixel main camera and a 50-megapixel periscope telephoto camera. The periscope camera could be absent on the Honor 700.
Both phones may house batteries with capacities of around 9,000mAh and come in shared colour options such as Cool White, Sky Blue, Azure, and Pink Mist.
Honor has launched the X9e s in the Middle East, and the main reason to look at it is the battery. You get an 8,560mAh cell and 80W wired charging for 1,499 Saudi Riyal (about Rs 38,000), which puts battery life ahead of everything else on the spec sheet.
The phone isn’t a new design. It’s the Honor Turbo 5G under a different name. If you’ve read about that phone, you already know most of what’s here.
Honor packs the said 8,560mAh battery into a body that is 7.76 mm thick and weighs 196 grams. Honor hasn’t said how long a full charge takes at 80W, but claims it offers a 3-day battery life.
Honor is using the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 with an Adreno 810 GPU to power the phone. You get 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, and that’s the only configuration on sale, so there’s no cheaper or larger option to pick. The phone runs MagicOS 10 on top of Android 16.
The front has a 6.79-inch 1.5K AMOLED panel running at 120Hz. It reaches 1,800 nits at peak brightness and has 3,840Hz PWM dimming.
On the back, the two lenses and an LED flash sit inside a round camera module. The main camera is 50MP, and it’s paired with a 5MP ultrawide. The front camera is 16MP.
The X9e s supports Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.2, and NFC. For wired connectivity, you get a USB-C port, but it only runs at USB 2.0 speeds, so moving large files over a cable will be slow. To unlock the phone, you use an optical fingerprint scanner built into the display.
Price and gifts
The 8GB/256GB model costs 1,499 Saudi Riyal (about Rs 38,000) in Dawn Orange, Glacier White or Midnight Black. If you order from Honor’s UAE store, you also get free items worth 298 Saudi Riyal (about Rs 7,500). The bundle includes an Honor coffee cup, one year of accidental damage protection, and one year of battery capacity guarantee service.
Oppo unveiled the Find X10 series on September 22 in China, and October is almost over. Now, the brand is shifting its focus to its next launch event in its home market. Today, Oppo confirmed that the Reno 17 series will be announced in November in China.
Oppo’s November launch details emerge
The Oppo Reno series spokesperson, Zhang Ruoxing, has confirmed that the November launch event will see the arrival of three products: the Reno 17 series, Oppo Pad Air 6, and Watch 5.
The Reno 17 series is now available for reservations in China. At present, there is no information about the number of devices in the lineup, but recent reposts suggest that it will include the Reno 17 and Reno 17 Pro.
The Pro variant is expected to include a 6.32-inch OLED 1.5K 120Hz display, a Dimensity 8500 Super chip, and a 7,000mAh battery. For photography, it may feature a 50-megapixel front camera and a triple rear camera setup comprising a 200-megapixel main camera with gimbal stabilisation, a 50-megapixel ultrawide camera, and a 50-megapixel periscope telephoto camera.
The standard model may feature the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chip, a 7,000mAh battery, and a 50-megapixel triple camera unit. The global lineup, which is also in the works, has a device named the Reno 17F. It is said to have a 6.57-inch OLED display, 12GB of RAM, and 512GB of storage. This device may arrive in China with a different branding.
Official teasers reveal that the Pad Air 6 will feature a brand-new Oppo Notes app and support one-tap file transfer. This will allow users to insert images into notes with a tap, import vlog footage into the CapCut media library with a tap, and quickly place footage by tapping the editing track during editing.
The technical details of the Pad Air 6 and Watch 5 have not surfaced yet in rumors. However, the teaser suggests that the smartwatch will feature a square dial and is also expected to have a SIM slot to offer 5G support.
Oppo introduced the Ultra variant in its Find X series with the Find X7 Ultra back in 2024. While the non-Pro X-series flagships come equipped with Dimensity chipsets, Oppo’s Ultra flagships exclusively feature Snapdragon chips. This may change with the Find X10 Ultra, which is expected to arrive next year.
Oppo Find X10 Ultra Dimensity Edition could be in the works
According to the tipster, the Dimensity 9600 Pro-powered Find X10 Ultra variant is testing the integration of chip-level imaging algorithms. If this comes true, it would mark a major change in Oppo’s chipset strategy for the Ultra series, as the Find X10 Ultra could become its first phone with a Dimensity chip. However, it is advisable to wait for further reports to know the exact chipset that will power the device.
Oppo Find X10 Ultra specifications (rumored)
So far, reports have revealed that the Find X10 Ultra’s rear camera setup will comprise a 200-megapixel LOFIC main sensor on a roughly 1/1.12-inch module, a 200-megapixel periscope telephoto camera, and a 50-megapixel 10x periscope camera that may use Samsung’s GNB or OmniVision’s OV51A. A 100-megapixel square selfie camera and a Samsung HP5 ultrawide camera are also under discussion, along with telephoto macro support.
On the front, it will house a 6.89-inch 2K BOE panel with a 144Hz refresh rate and a battery capacity of around 8,500mAh, with 100W wired and 50W wireless charging. Earlier leaks put its pricing in Find N6 territory, at around 10,000 yuan (~$1,480).
As far as the launch is concerned, the Find X10 Ultra is expected to break cover in the first half of 2027 in China. At present, there is no information about the phone’s global launch.
A $699 tablet outrunning an iPad Pro in a CPU test sounds odd, but that’s what an early Geekbench 7 listing suggests for the iPad mini (2026). Its single-core score of 3,879 is about 8% above the 3,580 posted by the M5 iPad Pro 13. The Pro still wins on multi-core by 53%, with 15,126 points against the mini’s 9,870.
Apple announced the tablet this week with an OLED panel, an IP67 body, and iPadOS 27, and it goes on sale November 6. Pre-orders are open now at $699, €749, and £699.
The Geekbench listing shows the iPad running on A20 Pro with two performance cores clocked at 4.93GHz and three efficiency cores. It is the binned version of the chip available on the 128GB and 256GB model, while the 512GB variant gets the full six-core A20 Pro. Had it been the full A20 Pro on Geekbench, the difference in multi-core between the M5 iPad Pro 13 and the iPad mini (2026) could’ve been a little lower.
That said, the new model is substantially faster than the previous iPad mini. Geekbench posts its single- and multi-core scores at 2529 and 6741 points, which makes the new model over 45% faster in single-core and 35% faster in multi-core.
All in all, the result suggests the iPad mini (2026) should handle everyday tasks such as opening apps and browsing just as quickly as, or quicker than, some more expensive iPads.
The difference could be more noticeable with heavier workloads such as video exports and rendering, where the additional CPU cores in the iPad Air 13 and iPad Pro 13 give them an advantage.
Google has released Android 17 to all eligible Pixel devices, and recently, other Android brands have also begun rolling it out to their devices. Most of them have already announced the complete rollout schedule, which tells you when a particular device gets the update.
If you have an Android device but have yet to receive the Android 17 update, take a look at the rollout schedule below to find out when it’s your time to hit the update button.
[Note: Most Android brands roll out updates in batches, and therefore the availability of an update depends on your region.]
Google Android 17 rollout plan
Google Pixels are usually the first phones to get a taste of the new OS, and all of them receive the update at the same time, unlike other brands which roll out updates in phases.
This year, Google released the Android 17 update on June 16. Here’s a list of Pixel devices that received the update:
Pixel 10, 10 Pro, 10 Pro XL, 10 Pro Fold, 10a
Pixel 9, 9 Pro, 9 Pro XL, 9 Pro Fold, 9a
Pixel 8, 8 Pro, 8a
Pixel 7, 7 Pro, 7a
Pixel 6, 6 Pro, 6a
Pixel Tablet
Pixel Fold
If your Pixel isn’t running Android 17, go to Settings > System and tap Software updates to get the latest update.
Samsung Android 17 (One UI 9) rollout plan
Samsung has not announced the rollout timeline for One UI 9, which is based on Android 17. However, the update has already reached dozens of Galaxy devices.
As of writing this post, nearly all high-end and mid-range Galaxy devices have started to receive the One UI 9 update. Some entry-level devices too have recently begun to receive the major upgrade.
The One UI 9 rollout may be already into the last few phases, but the brand has yet to release rollout timeline, and it now appears there won’t be any. You can visit this page to see which Galaxy devices have received Android 17.
OnePlus Open, OnePlus 13R, OnePlus 12, OnePlus Nord 6, OnePlus Nord CE6, OnePlus Pad 3
December 2026
OnePlus 12R, OnePlus 12R Genshin Impact Edition, OnePlus 11, OnePlus Nord 5, OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite, OnePlus Nord CE5, OnePlus Pad 2, OnePlus Pad Go 2
Q1 2027
OnePlus Nord 4, OnePlus N6, OnePlus N6x, OnePlus N6 Lite, OnePlus Pad Lite
Xiaomi Android 17 (ColorOS 17) rollout schedule
Xiaomi hasn’t announced the global Android 17 rollout schedule for its devices. However, it has announced the timeline for Chinese users, which gives a rough idea about which global devices are eligible for the update and in what order they will likely receive the update.
Here’s the Android 17 rollout schedule for China:
Timeline
Devices
October 15, 2026
Xiaomi: Xiaomi 17 Ultra, Xiaomi 17 Ultra Satellite Edition, Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, Xiaomi 17 Pro, Xiaomi 17, Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Redmi: Redmi K90 Pro Max, Redmi K90 Pro, Redmi K90 Pro Lamborghini Edition, Redmi K90 Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro, Xiaomi Pad 8
Xiaomi: Xiaomi 15 Pro, Xiaomi 15 Pro Titanium Edition, Xiaomi 15 Ultra, Xiaomi 15S Pro, Xiaomi 15, Xiaomi 14 Ultra, Xiaomi MIX Fold 4, Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro, Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro, Xiaomi Pad 7 Max, Xiaomi Pad 7 Redmi: Redmi K80, Redmi K80 Pro Champion Edition, Redmi K70 Extreme Edition, Redmi K70, Redmi Turbo 3, Redmi Turbo 3 Harry Potter Edition, Redmi Pad Pro
November 30, 2026
Xiaomi: Xiaomi MIX Flip, Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro Redmi: Redmi K70 Pro, Redmi Note 15 Pro+, Redmi Note 15, Redmi Pad Pro 5G, Redmi Pad 2 Redmi Pad 2 Explorer Edition, Redmi Pad 2 5G
We’ll update here when the brand announces a global rollout plan.
The global rollout should begin anytime soon as Xiaomi has been testing HyperOS 4 beta on multiple global models for a quite while now.
Oppo Android 17 (ColorOS 17) rollout plan
Oppo has announced the ColorOS 17 rollout plan for its devices. The Android 17-based update offers plenty of exciting features and useful upgrades. You can read more about them on this page.
Here’s the official ColorOS 17 rollout schedule for Oppo devices:
OPPO Find N3, Find N3 Flip, Reno15 Pro Max 5G, Reno15 Pro 5G, Reno15 Pro Mini 5G, Reno15 5G, Reno15 FS 5G, Reno15 F 5G, Reno15c 5G, Reno15 A, Reno14 Pro 5G, Reno14 5G, Reno14 5G Diwali Edition, Reno14 FS 5G, Reno14 F 5G, Reno14 F Dark Side Limited Edition, K14x 5G, K14 5G, K13x 5G, F33 5G, F31 5G, F29 5G
December 2026
OPPO Reno13 Pro 5G, Reno13 5G, Reno13 FS 5G, Reno13 A, Reno13 F 5G, Reno13 F, K13 Turbo Pro 5G, K13 Turbo 5G, K13 5G, Pad 5, Pad 5 Matte Display Edition, Pad 3 Pro, Pad 3, Pad 3 Matte Display Edition
Q1 2027
OPPO Find N2 Flip, Reno12 Pro 5G, Reno12 Pro 5G Manish Malhotra Limited Edition, Reno12 5G, F33 Pro 5G, F31 Pro+ 5G, F31 Pro 5G, F29 Pro 5G, Pad SE, Pad SE Matte Display Edition
Vivo, iQOO Android 17 (OriginOS 7) rollout plan
Vivo has also announced its Android 17 rollout schedule for the eligible Vivo and iQOO devices. The update comes with a new OriginOS 7 skin at the top, bringing plenty of helpful AI features, new features, and enhancements through the system.
Here’s the official rollout timeline:
Timeline
Devices
End of October 2026
Vivo: Vivo X Fold 5, Vivo X300 Ultra, Vivo X300 Pro, Vivo X300, Vivo X300 FE iQOO: iQOO 15
Mid November 2026
Vivo: Vivo X200 Pro, Vivo X200, Vivo X200 FE, Vivo X200T iQOO: iQOO 15R, iQOO 13
Mid December 2026
Vivo: Vivo X Fold 3 Pro, Vivo X100 Pro, Vivo X100, Vivo V70 Elite, Vivo V70, Vivo V70 FE, Vivo V60, Vivo V60e iQOO: iQOO 12, iQOO Neo 10, iQOO Neo 10R
End of December 2026
Vivo: Vivo V50, Vivo V50e
End of January 2027
Vivo: Vivo V40 Pro, Vivo V40, Vivo S2, Vivo S2 FE, Vivo T5 Pro 5G, Vivo T5 5G, Vivo T5x 5G, Vivo T4 Ultra, Vivo T4 Pro, Vivo T4 5G, Vivo T4R 5G, Vivo T3 Ultra, Vivo Y51 Pro 5G iQOO: iQOO Neo9 Pro, iQOO Z11 5G, iQOO Z11x 5G, iQOO Z11xa 5G, iQOO Z10 5G, iQOO Z10R 5G
End of February 2027
Vivo: Vivo V40e, Vivo V30 Pro, Vivo V30, Vivo V30e, Vivo Y400 Pro 5G, Vivo Y400 5G, Vivo Y31 Pro 5G, Vivo T4x 5G iQOO: iQOO Z10x 5G
Realme Android 17 (ColorOS 17) rollout plan
OnePlus isn’t the only one leaving its legacy software and switching to Oppo’s ColorOS 17. Realme is following the same path. It means all Realme devices getting the Android 17 update will receive ColorOS 17 instead of Realme UI 8.
The change applies to upcoming phones as well. Meaning, all upcoming phones will come with Oppo’s software.
Here’s the Android 17 rollout timeline for Realme devices:
While Motorola has improved its rollout pace this year, it still has not published a rollout schedule yet for Android 17. So, you know about it only when it reaches your device.
If you’re waiting for the Android 17 update on your device, it’s worth checking whether your Motorola device is eligible for it. You can check the official list of eligible devices on this page.
The Vivo S70 now has a fuller spec sheet. We previously reported that the Vivo S70 could get a bigger telephoto sensor and support for an attachable teleconverter. A new leak from tipster Digital Chat Station adds the chip, the display, and the rest of the camera setup. Vivo hasn’t confirmed any of it yet.
According to the tipster, the Vivo S70 has a 6.59-inch 1.5K LTPS OLED with a flat screen. That’s the same size and resolution as the Vivo S60, which launched in China in May.
The chip is Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. The Vivo S60 runs the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, so this would be a generational step up. Vivo’s S series has kept the 8s line for its top model, and the S70 Flagship Edition would continue that.
On the front, you get a 50MP selfie camera, which matches the Vivo S60. The back has a 50MP main camera with a large sensor, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 64MP Sony LYT-610 periscope telephoto. The Vivo S60 uses a 50MP periscope with 3x optical zoom, so the telephoto is where the S70 moves up.
A 64MP sensor gives the telephoto more resolution to work with when you crop in. The leak doesn’t say what the optical zoom factor is, so we don’t know yet whether Vivo is keeping the 3x range or changing it.
Teleconverter support
The leak also says the phone supports a 200mm teleconverter. Vivo has offered this kind of accessory on its X series, and theVivo X300 FE was the first FE model to support the 200mm Telephoto Extender Gen 2. If the S70 Flagship Edition gets the same support, it would be the first S series phone with a teleconverter option.
The extender is an optional accessory, so it would likely be an add-on purchase rather than something included in the box. The tipster doesn’t reveal which extender generation the S70 would work with, or what it would cost.
Everything here comes from one tipster, and the specs describe what the leak says the phone has. Vivo hasn’t announced the Vivo S70, its price, or its battery size, and leaked specs can change before launch. Earlier reports pointed to a November launch in China.
The iQOO Neo 12 and OnePlus Ace 7 have a lot in common, perhaps more than you’d expect from two competing gaming phones. Both come with a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chip, a built-in cooling fan, a 9,000mAh battery, 100W charging, and a display that can reach 185Hz. They also launched just a day apart, making a comparison between the two almost inevitable.
But the similarities start to break down once you look beyond those headline specifications. The iQOO Neo 12 has a sharper 2K display and a 1TB storage option, while the OnePlus Ace 7 gets a 200MP main camera and an LTPO panel. Their cooling systems are also different, and there are some interesting differences in weight, water resistance, and gaming features.
So, which one actually gives you more for your money? The iQOO Neo 12 launched in China on October 28, followed by the OnePlus Ace 7 on October 29. Here’s how the two compare, from their displays and performance to battery life, cameras, and everything in between.
1. The two phones are closer in size than you might expect
Neither phone is particularly small, but their dimensions are surprisingly close. The iQOO Neo 12 measures 163.42 x 75.89mm, while the OnePlus Ace 7 comes in at 162.30 x 77.37mm. The OnePlus is a little shorter but around 1.5mm wider.
Depending on the color, the Neo 12 measures somewhere between 8.50mm and 8.67mm, while the OnePlus comes in at 8.50mm to 8.59mm. Likewise, the iQOO Neo 12 weighs between 225g and 229g, compared with 217g to 223g for the OnePlus Ace 7.
The finishes are a little more interesting. OnePlus has an aluminum frame and Oppo Crystal Shield glass on the front. Midnight Black and Glossy White have fiberglass backs, while Tempered Fire gets a glass back with a sandblasted finish and a gradient metal frame.
iQOO has gone with Shadow Black, Frostblade Blue, and Contender. The Contender version has a light effect that changes as you tilt the phone, giving it a different look depending on the viewing angle.
OnePlus has the longer list of water-resistance ratings. The Ace 7 carries IP66, IP68, IP69, and IP69K certifications, while the Neo 12 has IP68 and IP69 ratings. iQOO also says the cooling fan assembly has passed IPX8 and IPX9 tests.
2. Display: 2K resolution or LTPO?
Here’s one of the bigger differences between the two phones. The iQOO Neo 12 has a 6.83-inch AMOLED display with a 3200 x 1440 resolution and 514 PPI. That’s noticeably sharper than the 2772 x 1272 panel on the OnePlus Ace 7, which measures 6.78 inches and has a pixel density of 450 PPI.
In terms of total pixels, the difference is roughly 4.6 million versus 3.5 million. Both panels can reach 185Hz, so neither phone has an advantage in the maximum refresh rate for supported games.
OnePlus does have something iQOO hasn’t confirmed: LTPO technology. The Ace 7’s display can drop to 1Hz and reach 165Hz during regular use, with 185Hz available in games. That gives it more flexibility when the screen doesn’t need to refresh so frequently.
Brightness figures are fairly close, too. iQOO claims 2,200 nits of full-screen peak brightness, while OnePlus lists a 2,000-nit peak and a 1,000-nit default maximum. The OnePlus panel also supports 3840Hz PWM dimming and has TÜV Rheinland Smart Eye Comfort 6.0 certification.
iQOO hasn’t left out eye-care features. The Neo 12 has circularly polarized light 2.0, TÜV Rheinland eye-protection certifications, and a 1-nit sleep screen. The company hasn’t confirmed whether the display supports LTPO, though, so we can’t make a direct comparison of how efficiently the two panels handle lower refresh rates.
If screen sharpness is your priority, the iQOO has the advantage. The OnePlus has a more flexible refresh-rate range, which could help with power consumption during everyday use.
3. Performance and gaming
Both phones have Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, a 3nm chip with two cores clocked at around 4.6GHz and six performance cores. An Adreno 840 GPU handles graphics, while LPDDR5X Ultra memory and UFS 4.1 storage take care of RAM and internal storage.
There’s a small catch with the OnePlus, though. The Ace 7 has the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB), rather than the standard version found in the iQOO Neo 12. OnePlus says both chips share the same architecture. Reports about other phones have described the V Series as a binned version with a smaller GPU, but OnePlus lists the same Adreno 840 name and a 1.2GHz clock.
The gaming chips are another point of difference. iQOO has its Q3 chip, which handles ray tracing, super resolution, and frame interpolation. The company says the Neo 12 can run supported games at 2K resolution and 185fps with all three features enabled.
OnePlus has split those jobs across three chips: the T3 touch chip, G3 network chip and P4 display chip. The T3 reportedly improves touch accuracy by 24%.
The touch sampling numbers make for an interesting comparison. iQOO lists a 5,000Hz instantaneous touch sampling rate and a 500Hz multi-finger rate. OnePlus doesn’t share an instantaneous figure, but its multi-finger rate reaches 520Hz. The Ace 7 also has an 800Hz gyroscope sampling rate in game mode, compared with 500Hz on the Neo 12.
Game support is another area where the two brands are making similar promises. iQOO says more than 50 titles support native 185fps gameplay on the Neo 12, while OnePlus lists nearly 40.
Both companies have also published results from hour-long gaming sessions. OnePlus says the Ace 7 averaged around 184 to 185fps in Delta Force over an hour. iQOO claims the Neo 12 maintained an average of 185fps in Call of Duty: Mobile over the same period.
Those results look good on paper, but the games and testing conditions aren’t identical. We’ll need to see how both phones perform in the same games before drawing any conclusions about which one handles sustained gaming better.
4. Cooling systems
A built-in fan is already a fairly unusual feature on a smartphone, and both companies have put considerable effort into the hardware surrounding it. The two systems aren’t identical, though.
The iQOO Neo 12 has a 17 x 17mm fan with three modes: low noise, intelligent, and high speed. At its highest setting, it can move up to 9,770 cm³ of air per minute. A 3D vapor chamber handles additional heat, with iQOO claiming a 15% improvement in heat dissipation over the Neo 11.
OnePlus has a more complicated arrangement called the Dual-Path Glacier Air-Cooling System. It has two separate airflow paths, with one directing air across a 14-layer fin stack positioned against the chip. The heat exchange area measures 1,264 mm².
The other path sends cool air toward the back cover, so the part of the phone you actually hold doesn’t get as hot. OnePlus says its backward-curved fan blades deliver 40% more airflow at the same noise level. There’s also a 6K vapor chamber, which the company claims improves heat dissipation by another 40%.
Dust is another concern with a fan inside a phone. OnePlus says the Ace 7 has a dust-resistant fan structure that passed a 24-hour test, three times the standard eight-hour test.
The company also claims the chip area stays up to 10 degrees Celsius cooler after an hour of gaming at 185fps with the fan switched on. iQOO hasn’t shared a similar temperature comparison, although it says the Neo 12’s cooling system keeps performance stable under heavy loads.
It’s difficult to say which arrangement works better without testing both phones. OnePlus has shared more details about its cooling hardware, but that doesn’t automatically mean it performs better than iQOO’s setup.
5. Battery and charging
Both phones have a typical battery capacity of 9,000mAh, which is a lot even by current gaming phone standards. The rated capacities are slightly different, though. The iQOO Neo 12 has an 8,820mAh battery rated at 32.90Wh, while the OnePlus Ace 7 has an 8,775mAh battery rated at 32.74Wh.
That’s a small difference, so battery life will probably depend more on the display, software, and cooling system than those extra 45mAh.
The battery technology isn’t the same, either. iQOO has fifth-generation silicon anode technology and claims the battery retains at least 80% of its capacity after 1,150 charging cycles. OnePlus has gone with a silicon-carbon battery with an energy density of 929Wh/L.
As for battery life, the companies have shared some impressive numbers, but their tests aren’t directly comparable. iQOO claims up to 29.9 hours of short-video playback and around 10 hours of gaming at 185fps. OnePlus reports up to 23.98 hours of video playback at 120Hz and 6.82 hours of Peacekeeper Elite at 185fps.
Both support 100W wired charging. OnePlus says its included charger can take the Ace 7 to 58% in 30 minutes, with the fan running and the screen switched off. iQOO hasn’t shared an equivalent charging time.
Bypass charging is available on both phones, so you can play games while connected to a charger without continuously charging the battery. OnePlus also has a dedicated charging chip, which the company says keeps performance steady when the battery level gets low.
The iQOO Neo 12 has one extra charging feature: OTG reverse charging. OnePlus doesn’t list reverse charging for the Ace 7. Neither phone supports wireless charging.
6. Cameras
The OnePlus Ace 7 has the bigger number on its camera specification sheet. Its 200MP main camera has a 1/1.56-inch sensor, an f/1.8 aperture, and OIS. There’s also an 8MP ultra-wide camera with a 112-degree field of view.
The main camera supports 1x, 2x, and 4x zoom, along with up to 20x digital zoom. Video recording goes up to 4K at 120fps or 8K at 30fps, and RAW photo support is included.
The iQOO Neo 12 has a 50MP Sony IMX921 main camera with a 1/1.56-inch sensor, an f/1.88 aperture, and OIS. Its secondary camera is also an 8MP ultra-wide shooter.
The iQOO can record 8K video and has portrait modes at 23mm, 35mm, and 50mm. Both phones have 16MP selfie cameras, with an f/2.45 aperture on the iQOO and f/2.4 on the OnePlus.
Neither phone has a dedicated telephoto camera, so the zoom options rely on the main sensor. The OnePlus Ace 7 Pro does have a telephoto camera, but that’s a separate model.
The 200MP sensor gives OnePlus a resolution advantage, but megapixels alone don’t tell us which phone takes better pictures. Sensor processing and image quality will need a proper camera comparison.
7. Software and connectivity
The iQOO Neo 12 runs OriginOS 7 based on Android 17, while the OnePlus Ace 7 ships with ColorOS 17. Both have their own software extras, although some are more interesting than others.
iQOO has included a PC game emulator that works with its G1 gamepad. The controller is sold separately, but it gives the Neo 12 another option for people who want to play PC games on their phone.
OnePlus has a different kind of extra. The Ace 7 supports connections with Apple devices, including iPhone call and message relay and Apple Watch connectivity through OPPO’s apps. That’s a useful addition if you carry an iPhone or Apple Watch alongside your Android phone.
The rest of the connectivity hardware is largely the same. Both phones have Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, an infrared blaster, dual speakers, and an ultrasonic fingerprint reader. The iQOO Neo 12 also supports face unlock.
Bluetooth audio support is slightly different. iQOO lists LDAC, aptX Lossless, and LHDC 5.0, while OnePlus lists BLE Audio.
8. Memory, storage and price
Both phones start with 12GB of RAM and have a 16GB option, but iQOO gives buyers more storage choices.
The Neo 12 comes in 256GB, 512GB and 1TB configurations. OnePlus has four options: 12GB+256GB, 16GB+256GB, 12GB+512GB and 16GB+512GB. There’s no 1TB version of the Ace 7.
iQOO has also announced the Neo 12’s Chinese pricing. The 12GB+256GB model starts at 4,399 yuan, while the 16GB+256GB version costs 4,799 yuan. The 12GB+512GB model is priced at 5,099 yuan, and the 16GB+512GB version costs 5,499 yuan. The top-end 16GB+1TB model will set buyers back 6,499 yuan.
OnePlus hasn’t included the Ace 7’s pricing in its official specification sheet, so we don’t yet know how the two compare on price.
9. iQOO Neo 12 vs OnePlus Ace 7: Specs compared
iQOO Neo 12
OnePlus Ace 7
Chip
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series
Gaming chips
iQOO Q3
T3 touch, G3 network, P4 display
Cooling
Fan + 3D vapor chamber
Dual-path fan + 14-layer fin stack + 6K vapor chamber
Display
6.83-inch AMOLED, 3200 x 1440, 185Hz
6.78-inch LTPO OLED, 2772 x 1272, 1–165Hz (185Hz in games)
Peak brightness (claimed)
2,200 nits full-screen
2,000 nits
Battery
9,000mAh (8,820mAh rated)
9,000mAh (8,775mAh rated)
Charging
100W wired, OTG reverse
100W wired, 58% in 30 minutes (claimed)
Main camera
50MP Sony IMX921, f/1.88, OIS
200MP, f/1.8, OIS
Ultra-wide
8MP
8MP, 112°
Front camera
16MP, f/2.45
16MP, f/2.4
Storage
256GB / 512GB / 1TB
256GB / 512GB
Water rating
IP68 / IP69
IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K
Size and weight
163.42 x 75.89 x 8.50–8.67mm, 225–229g
162.30 x 77.37 x 8.50–8.59mm, 217–223g
Software
OriginOS 7 (Android 17)
ColorOS 17
Starting price
4,399 yuan
Not listed
10. Which one should you buy?
The iQOO Neo 12 and OnePlus Ace 7 are close enough that there’s no obvious winner based on their headline specifications. The iQOO has a sharper 2K display, a higher claimed full-screen brightness, a 5,000Hz instantaneous touch sampling rate, and a 1TB storage option. It also has the standard Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 rather than the V Series version.
The OnePlus Ace 7 is lighter, has a 200MP main camera with 4K 120fps recording, an LTPO display, and more water-resistance ratings. Its Apple device connectivity features are another small advantage if you already own an iPhone or Apple Watch.
Cooling and battery life could make the comparison more interesting, but we’ll have to test both phones before deciding which one handles long gaming sessions better. Price will also matter, especially since OnePlus hasn’t announced the Ace 7’s cost.
For now, the iQOO Neo 12 has the edge in display resolution and storage, while the OnePlus Ace 7 offers a higher-resolution main camera, a lighter body, and extra connectivity features.
Samsung’s next vanilla flagship is showing up on more safety paperwork. The Galaxy S27 has now cleared UL Solutions (Demko) in Denmark, and the electrical ratings line up with 25W wired charging for a long list of global variants. That matches what China’s 3C filings already hinted at for the base model. Here’s a look at what the newest certifications have revealed.
Galaxy S27 UL Solutions certification details
Galaxy S27
Galaxy S27
Both listings rate the phone at 9V DC and 2.77A, or about 24.93W, which rounds to the familiar 25W marketing figure used on the Galaxy S26. The paperwork covers a wide map of SKUs, including SM-S952U and SM-S952U1 for the US, SM-S952W for Canada, SM-S9520 for China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, Japan codes SC-51H, SM-S952Q, and SM-S952Z, Europe’s SM-S952B and SM-S952B/DS, and SM-S952N for South Korea.
That spread is typical for a global S-series base model, and it suggests Samsung is keeping one charging ceiling across those regions rather than carving out a faster international-only path. The Plus and Ultra tiers have historically sat higher on wired charging, so this Demko pair is really about the standard S27, not a blanket claim for the whole lineup.
Wireless charging is not spelled out here. The S26 offered 15W wireless, and that is still the working assumption for the S27 until more filings appear. Battery size for the vanilla model is also open; recent TÜV paperwork has been clearer on the Pro and Ultra cells than on the base phone.
Samsung is still expected to bring a four-model S27 series early next year, likely in a late-January or early-February window. Privacy-display talk is now stretching beyond the Ultra, and regional chipset splits between Exynos and Snapdragon remain unconfirmed. For now, the Demko pair mainly locks in that the international Galaxy S27 is not jumping past 25W wired charging, the same ceiling the base S models have held for years.
According to him, the OnePlus Ace 7 Pro reached 225% of the OnePlus Ace 6’s sales during its first sales period. He also said the OnePlus 16 and the OnePlus Ace 7 Pro took the top two spots for first-day Android phone sales in 2026. These figures come from OnePlus itself, with no independent data behind them. Li Jie has made similar claims before, such as when the OnePlus Ace 6T beat rival models’ full-day sales within ten minutes.
Li Jie also shared what he heard from shoppers at offline stores. According to him, buyers said they were drawn to the phone’s performance, 185Hz gaming refresh rate, ColorOS 17, and camera system. The latter combines a 200MP main sensor with a periscope telephoto lens. He also described the pricing as very competitive, adding that some discounts are available for a limited time.
The OnePlus Ace 7 Pro runs on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, and OnePlus has added a cooling system to help the chip maintain performance during demanding tasks. The company calls it the industry’s first Dual-Path Glacier Cooling System, with one airflow path cooling the chip directly and another cooling the back cover.
The display is another feature the Ace 7 series shares with the OnePlus 16. All models use the fourth-generation Oriental Screen, a BOE panel with custom X4 luminescent material and an LTPO circuit. OnePlus detailed the display ahead of the OnePlus 16 launch, confirming support for refresh rates of up to 185Hz in supported games and 165Hz across the system.
OnePlus claims the Ace 7 series is the only performance phone in its price range with a system-wide 165Hz refresh rate. Unlike a high refresh rate limited to certain games, this applies to everyday use, including scrolling through menus and navigating the interface.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.